1

2

ORBIT

ADVERTISING RATES We invite advertisers to use ORBIT to reach Astro-Philatelic enthusiasts worldwide. If readers have

a commercial source they think they would like others to benefit from please let the firm know of

us:. Rates are: Full page Display - £24 Half Page - £12 Quarter

Page £6 One eighth of a page - £4. Camera ready copy required with remittance by the above stated copy deadline for inclusion in

our next edition.

© Copyright 2009 The Astro Space Stamp Society. No article contained herein may be reproduced without

prior permission of the Author and the Society.

Editorial

Copy Deadline for the June 2009 issue is May 14th by which time all material intended for publication should

be with the Editor.

ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES Members in UK—£15

in Europe (EU and non-EU) - €30

Elsewhere - $45 equivalent

Juniors (under 18) £6.50

ASSS website at URL:

www.asss.utvinternet.com/

ISSN 0953 1599 THE JOURNAL OF THE ASTRO SPACE

STAMP SOCIETY Issue No 81 March 2009

Patron:

Cosmonaut Georgi Grechko, Hero of the Soviet Union

COMMITTEE

Chair : Margaret Morris, 55 Canniesburn Drive, Bearsden, Glasgow

G61 1RX (E-mail: MMorris671@aol.com)

Hon. Secretary: Brian J.Lockyer, 21, Exford Close,Weston-Super-Mare,

Somerset BS23 4RE

(E-mail : brian.lockyer@tesco.net)

Compiler of Checklist / Hon Treasurer / Postal Packet Organiser

Harvey Duncan,16, Begg Avenue, Falkirk, Scotland FK1 5DL

(E-mail: duncan1975@btinternet.com)

Orbit : Editor Jeff Dugdale, Glebe Cottage, Speymouth, Mosstodloch, Moray.

Scotland IV32 7LE (E-mail: jefforbited@aol.com)

Webmaster Derek Clarke, 36 Cherryfield Road, Walkington,

Dublin 12 (E-mail: dclarke@utvinternet.com)

Postal Auction Organiser: David Saunders, 42 Burnet Road, Bradwell,

Great Yarmouth. NR31 8SL.

Overseas Representatives:

Australia: Charles Bromser, 37 Bridport Street, Melbourne 3205. Germany:Jurgen P. Esders, An der Apostelkirche 10, 10783 Berlin

Eire:Derek Clarke, 36 Cherryfield Rd, Walkinstown. Dublin 12. France: Jean-Louis Lafon, 23 Rue de Mercantour, 78310 Maurepas

Netherlands: Bart Beimers, NJ Haismasrt 7, 9061 BV Gierkerk Russia: Mikhail Vorobyov, 31-12 Krupskaya Str, Kostroma

United States: Dr Ben Ramkissoon, 3011 White Oak Lane, Oak Brook, Il 60521 USA

Life Members: UK - Harvey Duncan, George Spiteri, Ian Ridpath, Margaret Morris, Michael Packham, Dr W.R. Withey, Paul Uppington,

Jillian Wood. Derek Clarke (Eire,) Charles Bromser (Australia.) Tom Baughn (U.S.A.,) Ross Smith (Australia,)

Vincent Leung Wing Sing (Hong Kong.) Mohammed K.Safdar (Saudi Arabia)

Did I say “Copernicus”….Sorry, actually I meant…

In my Editorial for the January issue I referred to the 400th anniversary of major discoveries by

Copernicus. This was a lapse of concentration—I should have said Galileo, of course—sorry.

This year’s Europa theme—Astronomy : see back page—is partly inspired by this year being 400 on

from when the great Italian scientist whom Einstein referred to as “The Father

of Modern Science” built his first telescopes

(shown in this 1983

Italian issue) and used them to observe the

Moon, Jupiter and Venus.

So later in the year in

addition to new material on Copernicus which I have asked Polish Orbit reader Stan Wekka to write we will

of course be celebrating the achievements of the great Italian with an article written by John Beenen

some years ago being refreshed with some new

philatelic illustrations.

This year is also the 400th anniversary of the publication of "Astronomia Nova", in which Kepler

published results of his ten-year long investigation of the motion of Mars. Look out for stamps and cancels

for that as well.

3

ORBIT

FROM ATOM TO NUCLEAR POWERED SPACECRAFT PART 4: NUCLEAR ENERGY Part 1 by John Beenen

The first nuclear reactor (pile) (401, the first nuclear reactor

in Chicago,

CP-1) During WW II

and directed by Enrico Fermi

( 1 9 0 1 - 1 9 5 4 ,

Italy 2001) and Leo Sz i la rd

(1898-1964) the first controlled

chain reaction by fission of uranium nuclei was

carried out in the USA.

On December 2nd 1942 the event took place in an unused squash

room in the cellars of the sports

stadium of the University of Chicago. In fact, this first nuclear

reactor CP-1 (Chicago Pile 1) was little more than a pile of blocks of 4000 tons of

graphite, packed in 45.000 stones in which 19.00 holes were drilled for 40 tons of uranium oxide pallets. The

graphite served as ‘moderator’, slowing down of the

neutron radiation. By removing a plank from the pile of blocks, the ‘zip’, coated with a neutron absorbing

cadmium the reactor was made critical. At that point exactly the right amount of neutrons was set free to

keep the amount of nuclear fissions constant, thus

regulating the chain reaction.

At 3:25 sharp (Chicago time) the scientist George Weil (1908-1995) removed the cadmium-coated control rod

and started the first controlled nuclear reaction. The reactor still was very primitive. The CP-1 possessed a

kind of cooling but no protection. However, in three

ways some security was provided : any emitted neutron-containing air could be sucked away by a surrounding

balloon. A second cadmium rod was placed in such a position that by means of a rope and one blow of an

axe it would fall into the reactor and a third team was

in place with cadmium-containing water to pour it into the reactor in case of an emergency.

But still because of the danger of the process getting

out of hand the experiments had to be cut off after 28

minutes at a power of 200 Watt. Later, more secret, experiments, however, showed that in such a way it

would be well possible to create the more easily fissionable plutonium-239 (239Pu) from the uranium.

The programme fell under the

direction of the physicist Samuel K.Al l ison (1900-1965), and

amongst others supporting were the brilliant mathematician Arthur

Compton (1892-1962) (402,

Arthur Compton, Guyana 2001) . Walter Zinn (1906-2000) - and

Herbert Anderson (1914-1988) supervised the construction.

Natural nuclear reactor

(403. Gabon) It is

interesting that is in Oklo, Gabon a

natura l nuc lear

reactor exists. (See photo at http://

www.ans.org/pi/np/oklo) and diagram

below). This reactor,

discovered in 1972, was formed about two milliard years ago when ground water came into contact with

an uran ium- r i ch material, by which the

water acts as a neutron moderator.

The water evaporates

as the reaction proceeds, by which

the react ion is damped and the fear

o f m e l t - d o w n

decreases. The source is an interesting object for study to look after the effect over the time of radioactive side

-products.

To the first commercial nuclear reactors In March 1943 the Chicago CP-1 was dismantled and transferred to a new location in Argonne Forest, about

40 km southwest of the city. After the making of a protection against radiation the reactor continued its

life as CP-2.

Next to it in Los Alamos, New Mexico, a separate

investigation was carried out. (404. President Truman, USA, Y1514) On August 1st 1946 President Truman

signed the ‘Atomic Energy Act’ (McMahon Act) by which the responsibility for the reactors came

under control of the American

government. In the same year the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) was

founded. Already at that time nuclear waste was considered as an important

problem. Walter Zinn became the

4

ORBIT

manager of Argonne National Labs However, as well

Argonne labs as Oak Ridge were located relatively close to inhabited areas the resistance against the presence

of the reactors grew rapidly and in 1949 they were relocated to Arco, Idaho, where the National Reactor

Testing Station was stationed.

In May 1949 at that location the construction of the

Argonne Experimental Breeding Reactor (ERB-1) was started, its construction was finished in April 1951. On

December 20th 1951 this reaction supplied the first nuclear electrical energy about 45 kW, four lamps of

150 W beingconnected and lighted. This became the

first reactor by which generally usable energy could be generated. Originally the reactor was called OP-4 or,

more popular, ZIP (Zinn’s Infernal Pile). Actually the production of energy was not the main goal as the

reactor first was meant for scientific experiments. In

such a reactor uranium-235 ‘burns’ and uranium-238 is transformed into plutonium.

The next reactor, the Materials Testing Reactor (MTR)

became critical on March 31st 1952 and achieved full power of 30.000 kW some weeks later. Another reactor

was built for use on submarines and came in use in

1953. This became the prototype for the first submarine driven by nuclear energy, the Nautilus on

March 30th 1953.

Many new reactors were under construction by now

such as the Borax III, a small, relatively cheap reactor based upon light-water by which the uranium core was

chilled in an open swimming-pool like tank. For the first time in the States from July 17th 1955 this reactor

served a complete town with energy, Arco in Idaho.

But the Americans were not the first, as the Soviets had already built their first commercial reactor at June 27th

1954 in Obninsk, Kaluga Oblast.

Other commercial reactors followed, for example in 1956 at Calder Hall in England and Shippingport,

Pennsylvania (December 2nd 1957), a reactor with a

power of 60 MW which was in service until 1982. In the sixties the number of reactors grew rapidly but as

men became conscious of the fact that they also could be very dangerous the interest for the generation of

this kind of energy decreased after that time.

In 1957 the International Energy Agency (IAEA) was

founded with its HQ in Vienna as part of the United Nations with the aim to promote the peaceful use of

nuclear energy and to oppose the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Atoms for Peace (405. Atoms for Peace, USA 1955, Y597) In a speech

on December 8th 1953 before the General Assembly of

the United Nations President Eisenhower explained that the peaceful use of nuclear energy was not a dream for

the future but that this

possibi l i ty a lready existed then and that

this greatest of all destructive powers

could be developed as

an advantage to all mankind. However, the

same speech showed the destructive capability of the United States and sent a message to the Soviet Union

about American power. Because of a huge PR campaign around it, since than this speech became

known as the ‘Atoms for Peace’ programme.

(406. Plows for Guns)

It resulted in the project ‘Plows ha re ’ u s i ng

nuclear explosions for

peaceful applications such as mining, large earth

displacements, harbour and channel construction,

garden building, tunnel c o n s t r u c t i o n e t c .

Ironically enough in 1958

this programme was offered to the 2nd

International Meeting for the Peaceful Application

of Nuclear Energy in Geneva by Edward Teller, one of

the inventors of the H-bomb.

However, not everybody agreed with this programme as many feared that it would lead to nuclear

proliferation as in the Acheson-Lilienthal Report of

March 16th 1946 it was stated that the pursuit of atomic energy and the pursuit of the atomic bombs were in

large part interchangeable and interdependent.

Before this President Truman had already started thinking about peaceful applications of atomic energy.

In a famous speech to Congress on October 3rd 1945 to

he said: “The hope of civilization lies in international arrangements looking, if possible, to the renunciation of the use and development of the atomic bomb, and directing and encouraging the use of atomic energy and all future scientific information toward peaceful and humanitarian ends”.

This statement lead finally to the Atomic Energy Act of 1946 as mentioned above.

The first PNE (Peaceful Nuclear Explosions) test ‘Gnome’ of 3,1 kiloton took place on December 10th

1961 in a salt bed southeast of Carslbad, New Mexico

at a depth of 361 m.

The object of this test was to see if steam could be generated to produce electricity. Also the use of useful

radioactive isotopes and their recovery was studied.

5

ORBIT

The test was only very partially successful, as

unintentionally, radioactive steam was vented while the press was watching.

The project ‘Sedan’, the second of the Plowshare-tests

with a strength of 104 kiloton displaced more than 12

million tons of soil and resulted in a radioactive cloud that rose to an altitude of nearly 4 km and a crater of

400 m in diameter and a depth of 100 m was formed. The radioactive dust plume headed northeast and then

towards the Mississippi River.

In spite of this result consideration was given to

digging a second Panama Canal ‘Panatomic Channel’ in this way, but the plans were cancelled after too much

opposition. Over the next year 26 more nuclear explosions were conducted.

The last three experiments each with a power of 30 kilotons, ‘Rio Blanco’, were carried out on May 17th

1973 on the test location at Colorado. The tests were done at a depth of 2 km and had the purpose to

investigate the collecting of gas. However, both location and gas became radioactive.

The Plowshare tests were officially stopped in 1977 when funds ended. The costs for the whole programme

were estimated at $ 770 million.

Atoms in Space The use of engines based upon nuclear propulsion was raised for the first time in 1946 when the American Air

Force started the ‘Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft’ project (NEPA). It became a reality when the Atomic Energy Committee joined the discussion within

the framework of the Lexington project and it was assigned to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Between 1949 and 1953 much investigation was done

for a compact design of a reactor, protection against

radiation and choice of materials. Besides application in air planes under the name NTR (Nuclear Thermal

Rocket) also the use in rockets was investigated. Within the ROVER project – a general name for the

investigation of nuclear propulsion – different reactor

were constructed and tested.

(407. Nerva) In 1961 the ‘Nuclear Engines for Rocket Vehicle Application’ (NERVA) took over the work of

Rover and started to construct a test based on this

principle. The experiments were carried out in Nevada, Jackass Fields, about 160 km west of Las Vegas. The

experiments bear names such as: KIWI, Phoebus, Peewee en Nuclear Furnace.

In the first place the rockets were meant for longer

flights to Mars, at that time planned for 1981, or

further into the solar system. Finally, a rocket was built with a thermal energy of 4000 Megawatt, two times as

powerful as the

largest based on chemicals. The NERVA

-2 was not small with its length of 43,69 m,

a diameter of 10,55 m

and a full weight of 178.321 kg.

However, after the

A m e r i c a n s h a d reached the Moon and

env i r o nme n t a l i s t s

protested against more launchings the

attention for such propulsion systems

decreased and on January 5th 1973 President Nixon

cancelled all subventions for this project.

(408. RTG model) During the development of the nuclear rocket,

however, another apparatus was developed, the RTG (Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator) which would

lead to great successes in space travel.

The RTG used the heat developed by radioactive decay

of specific isotopes and transferred it in electrical energy using the ‘Seebeck-effect’ named after Thomas

Seebeck, (1770-1837), an Estonian physicist who

discovered that in some metals an electrical current is developed when they are exposed to a difference in

temperature. Today this effect also is used in thermocouples. Hence, RTG’s are no nuclear reactors.

For an RTG different isotopes can be used which have to fulfil certain requirements. The decay time may not

be too short, enough heat must be developed, compared to its mass the maximum amount of energy

must be generated, the isotope itself and eventually also its decay products may not cause too much

radiation by preference only the, less penetrating,

alpha radiation.

The Americans preferred plutonium 238 (238Pu) with a half life time 87,7 year. Some Russian types use

strontium 90 (90Sr) for application on earth such as

6

ORBIT

remote lighthouses and beacons for navigation.

Unfortunately in such cases protection cannot carried out properly and in some cases the radioactive sources

had been stolen.

The first launched RTG went into space on June 29th

1961, the SNAP-3 (Systems Nuclear Auxiliary Power Program) in the Transit 4A satellite. Afterwards also

some ships and weather stations were supplied with such kind of atomic propulsion. SNAP-10A was

launched on April 3rd 1965 and became the first nuclear ionic engine in space.

(409. Pioneer, USA 1975, WB 31)

After that this kind of propulsion was often

used especially in

missions deep into our solar system and

beyond such as: Pioneer 10 and 11, Voyager 1 and 2, Galileo, Ulysses,

Cassini-Huygens and New Horizons.

RTG’s also delivered the energy for the Viking bases on

Mars and scientific experiments on the Moon for the Apollo’s 12 to 17 (SNAP 27). Also the Nimbus

(weather), Transit (espionage) and LES (Lincoln Experimental Satellite, communication) satellites used

RTG’s.

There was considerable resistance against the use of

RTG’s because in the event of a failure radioactivity could enter into the atmosphere. Principally RTG’s lose

their power slowly by radioactive decay, but for

instance after 25 year still 80% of the original power is available. The energy efficiency of the apparatus is

very low and is below 10% (3-7%). Newer types with a better yield are under construction.

Naturally the apparatus is designed in such a way that

they can resist an untidy return and this has proved to

be correct. Still the chance is not zero and after a failed launch of Transit 5BN3 on April 21st 1964 some

radioactivity was recorded at the fall site (Madagascar).

Moreover, it has to be remembered that 238Pu is more

than 275 times more toxic than the better known 239Pu from nuclear reactors. Fortunately it nearly only

releases alpha radiation which penetrates very little even through the skin. However if inhaled it can cause

great damage. 238Pu is not suitable for nuclear bombs as its decay time is too quick and also develops too

much heat for such an application.

Also with Soviet satellites some accidents occurred with

comparable reactors, such as on November 16th 1996 with Mars 96, where debris was spread over a large

area in the neighbourhood of Chile.

Accidents with Nuclear Reactors (410. Chernobyl, Ukraine 1996; 411. 20 years after Chernobyl, Belarus 2006)

On March 28th 1979 a major accident happened at a

nuclear reactor at Harrisburg, on Three Miles Island,

Pennsylvania. The disaster was caused by the loss of cooling liquid from the core by a mechanical defect

followed by a human failure. Therefore the core was superheated which caused an almost totally

uncontrolled reaction of the core a so-called ‘melt-

down’. In the long run it transpired that nobody was hurt or exposed to nuclear radiation but this accident

fed the concern by the general public about the safety of nuclear energy and led to much better safety

measurements in nuclear power plants. Unfortunately other accidents in nuclear power plants are known to

have had victims.

In the first place let us consider the accident which took place at Chernobyl, Ukraine,

on April 26th 1986 (on the day I write this it is exactly 20 years ago).

Because such type of reactors are only slightly

protected large amounts of radiation were blown into

the atmosphere (2-4.1018 Bq). A surface area of 200.000 km2 was contaminated for a prolonged time

with especially 137cesium (and also 131I , 134Ce) and the fire men and inhabitants (of the city of Pripyat) were

exposed to such an amount of radiation that the

consequences still are felt today.

Even levels of radiation of 16 Gy are found. Estimations of the final amount of victims are very

variable: between 3 and 56 persons were killed immediately, 9,000 to 90,000 died or will die at the

causes and 6.6 million of people have been exposed to

such levels of radiation that they will possibly experience its consequences or have already

experienced it. 336,000 have been temporarily evacuated. It is estimated that the amount of radiation

which was released was amount 300 times higher than

from the bomb on Hiroshima. About 60% came down on Belarussian territory, but the increase in

radioactivity was even noticeable in the eastern part of North-America.

About the cause of the accident two theories exist. The first put the guilt completely at the workers in the

7

ORBIT

plant. The other mentions fractures or weak sports in

the control rods also as a possible cause. In any case it is clear that the personnel did not know all weak spots

of the reactor and that the management and the crew was not well trained for the job. Also some safety

systems were switched off.

The following cases are somewhat lesser known.

One of the first nuclear accidents happened on December 12th 1952 and caused a partial melt-down of

the Chalk River plant by Ottawa in Canada because of accidental removing of four control rods. Although

millions of litres of radioactive water ran into the plant

there were no known casualties.

An accident occurred in England (October 7th 1957) when by a fire in a graphite controlled reactor at

Windscale north Liverpool, later renamed Sellafield,

an area of about 500 km2 was contaminated.

In Greifswald in Eastern-Germany in 1976 also nearly a melt-down happened by the failure of a safety system

in a fire.

In Goiânia, Brazil on September 18th 1987 244 persons

were contaminated when a 137cesium source from an apparatus for cancer therapy was sold as scrap. Four

persons were killed.

And on September 30th 1999 an uncontrolled chain

reaction took place in a Japanese reactor at Tokaimura by which large amounts of radioactive gas

were emitted. 39 persons were directly exposed to a high level of radiation and some wounded men were

counted.

(412. Model of an atom

(helium), Korea 1962, Y266; 413. Reaction vessel,

Germany 1964, Y311, 414. Model of an atom, Korea

1995)

As a principle two types of

reactors are known: Fission reactors and Fusion reactors. All 442 commercial reactors throughout the

world are fission reactors, which can be subdivided according their operation characteristics:

Thermal reactors

Thermal reactors use a moderator (retardant) to slow down the generated neutrons in such a way

that they are able to create a further fission Fast reactors

Fast reactors need no moderation. All first reactors

(a.o. EBR-1) were of this type, but also for safety reasons subsequent reactors were constructed of

the first type. Still at least 20 fast reactors were built afterwards.

Sub-critical reactors Sub-critical reactors use an external source for their

neutrons instead of a chain reaction. This concept,

however, is still in a theoretical state.

Hence, thermal reactors are by far the most prevalent and can be subdivided further according their way of

moderations:

1. Light water type (LWR, BWR, PWR, SSTAR)

8

ORBIT

2. Graphite moderated (Magnox, AGR, HTGR, RBMK,

PBMR) 3. Heavy water moderated (SGHWR, CANDU)

The most usual are the PWR-type reactors. Such reactors are cooled and moderated by water under

pressure. They are considered as the most safe and

reliable reactors, although the Harrisburg reactor was of this type.

BWR-type reactors generally are also very reliable,

although the boiling water causes more corrosion of construction parts and the reactor needs more

maintenance and protection.

The reactor of the heavy water type such as the

Canadian Candu-type are very efficient as the exhausted uranium can be changed during production.

In general uranium needs to be replaced after some

time, not because the material is exhausted, but because at the reaction substances are formed which

poison the fuel rods, i.e. scavenge the generated neutrons to such an extent that the reaction stops.

Canada has delivered such reactors to China, India, Pakistan, Rumania and South Korea.

The RMBK reactors are of Russian design but, certainly after the Chernobyl disaster, are not considered

sufficiently reliable anymore. They show some similarity to the Canadian Candu-reactors, are cooled with water

and possess a graphite moderation. In Eastern Europe,

however, some of such reactor are still in operation although the demands have been raised considerably.

( 4 1 5 . U r a n i u m

occurrences, Canada

1980,744) Gas cooled reactors of

the type GCR are found mainly in Great

Britain. They also possess a moderation

by graphite and are

cooled with carbon dioxide. The older types called Magnox, have been

decommissioned. Other types are less popular.

Most thermal reactors use light enriched uranium and

some work with a mixture of plutonium and uranium. The latter chemical normally is mined in dayshifts in

some countries such as: United States, Australia, Kazakhstan, Canada, South-Africa, Namibia and Russia.

The raw ore is milled and the uranium component, uranium oxide, is chemically separated. This powder is

called ‘yellow cake’. To enrich it, it is transferred into

uranium hexafluoride.

Standard 238uranium contains less than 1% of the more easy fissionable 235uranium. To be useful in nuclear

reactors it has to be enriched, that is, the contents of 235uranium have to be raised until about 4%. That

takes place in gas diffusion factories with the help of

gas centrifuges. For the use in weapons the enrichment has to be much higher to over 90%. The enriched

material is pressed into small pallets which are put into rods, which are closed.

These rods are the so-called ‘fuel rods’. As said, they serve for a couple of weeks until too many side-

products have been formed. Than the rods have to be replaced. Used fuel rods mostly are stored under water.

After a couple of decades they have become so ineffective that they can be stored under dry conditions

in steel of concrete containers.

Regeneration of the rods looks attractive but is

economically not very profitable as the collection of polonium from the rods results in an amount of 17

times more high radio active waste. Nuclear Fusion Reactors (416. Model Nuclear Fusion) As a

matter of fact it would be much more advantageous to replace the

nuclear fission reactors by nuclear fusion reactors.

In nuclear fusion two light nuclei are

brought together to form one,

heavier, (helium) nucleus. In such a process a gigantic amount of energy is generated: 1 kg fusion fuel (a mix

of deuterium and tritium) gives the same amount of energy of 10 million kgs of coal.

In fact the process of feeding our Sun is a nuclear fusion process and the hydrogen (H) bomb is partly a

kind of nuclear fusion.

(417. Sir George Thomson, Guinea 2001)

The first patent for a nuclear fusion

reactor is from 1946 in name of Englishman Sir George Paget

Thomson (1892-1975) and South-African born Moses Blackman (1908-

1983).

Nuclear fusion is much more safe than nuclear fission

as the process does not cause a chain reaction and stops immediately when the right conditions are not

exactly maintained. Moreover, the reaction product is a

very small quantity of non-dangerous helium. Only applied tritium (atomic weight 3, half life time 12 years)

could lead to dangerous consequences. The necessary tritium is produced at the spot from lithium, a raw

material present on earth in sufficient quantities. This also counts for the necessary deuterium present in sea

water in a quantity of 33 mg per litre. This amount

mixed with an equal quantity of tritium can supply an amount of energy comparable to 360 litre of petrol.

9

ORBIT

The wall of the reaction vessel is radiated with neutrons

through which it becomes radioactive. However, the right choice of the wall material can keep this

radioactivity as low as possible. In practice the radioactivity of such material will be so low after 50 to

100 years that recycling would be possible. In any case

a fusion reactor does not produce long living radio active waste and as such is a very attractive alternative

for fission reactors.

The most well-known design of an experimental fusion reactor is the Tokomah Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) in

the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) which

was used for experiments from 1982 to 1997.

(418. Igor Tamm, St.Vincent & Grenadines 2001, 419. Andrei Sakharov, Komi)

The principle of the Tokomah reactor was outlined in

1950 by the Russians Igor Y.Tamm (1895-1971) and Andrei Sakharov (1921-1989) of the Kurchatov Institute

in Moscow. A cloud of plasma consisting of deuterium and tritium is confined in a double toroid of a magnetic

field by which the cloud of an extremely high

temperature does not touch the wall of the reaction vessel.

Principally two types of fusion reactors have been

developed: the ‘Magnetic Confinement’ and the ‘Inertial

Confinement’ reactors.

Both principles take care that the plasma cloud of an extreme high temperature (150 million degrees Kelvin)

does not touch the wall of the vessel as no material on earth will resist such high temperatures.

The magnetic confinement reactor therefore captures the cloud in an magnetic field. The inertial confinement

reactor is designed in such a way that the energy density necessary for the reaction (100.000 per

nanosecond) is pressed into a small quantity of plasma

at such a speed (10-11 to 10-9 second) that the plasma has no time to move.

(420. Shiva, India) Such type of reactors use multiple

lasers known as ‘Shiva’ (the Indian God with several arms, read lasers)

and ‘Nova’ and are mounted in the

Lawrence Livermore Laboratories in Livermore California, part of the

American Department of Energy (DOE), the University of California

and the National Laboratory in Los

Alamos.

(421. Coulomb, France

1961, M1351) The fusion of the

d e u t e r i u m - t r i t i u m mixture requires an

e x t r e m e h i g h

t e m p e r a t u r e . Theoretically this high

temperature can be explained by Coulomb’s Law: “The magnitude of the electrostatic force between two point charges is directly proportional to the magnitudes of each charge and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the charges”. According to this law the particles first have to pass an

electrical repulsion before nuclear forces are able to fuse the particles. This requires the said extremely high

temperatures, if the temperature is the only

determining factor in the process. For a 1:1 mix of the said gases this threshold is about 45 million degrees

Kelvin.

In 1993 the experimental TFTR reactor had already delivered a reasonable amount of energy enough for

3000 homes. After that the project was transferred to

ITER begun in 1989 by Presidents Regan and Gorbachov and aims for a process for a long term

energy generation. In such a way that it must be able to generate an amount of energy of at least 500 MW

for 10 minutes, ten times more than necessary for the

generation of the heat fusion plasma.

Next to the International Space Station (ISS) at this moment ITER is considered as the largest scientific

programme The project is a collboration of several

countries: USA, Russian Federation, EU, Japan, China, South-Korea, India, Brazil, and Switzerland. The costs

of construction are 4,7 billon Euro over ten years. As a location for the reactor in 2005 the South-French

Cadarache in Saint-Paul-lès-Durance, somewhat north of Aix-en Provence, was chosen.

It is expected that after ITER a prototype of an electricity power plant can be build named: DEMO with

a power of 1000 MW.

Experimental fusion reactors such as JET (Joint

European Torus) (torus is a magnetic ring in thee shape of a doughnut) at Oxford in Great Britain, the

largest fusion experiment in the world and TEXTOR in Jülich, Germany, are part of the ITER project. Textor is

a cooperation of three partners: Germany, Belgium

and The Netherlands.

422. CERN, Spain 2004; 423.

CERN, Switzerland; 424. CERN, Switzerland 2004)

More fundamental research on the behaviour of matter

10

ORBIT ORBIT

is carried out in the well-respected institute CERN

(Centre Européen pour la Recherche Nucleaire) founded in 1954 and settled in the neighbourhood of

Geneva. This institute also is responsible for the

protocols (http://) and the language (html) for the World Wide Web (www).

It is clear that nuclear fusion gives the answer to all

energy problems in future. But, because of large

technical problems with the handling of the hot plasma cloud and the material choice of the reaction

vessel the experiments still have not delivered an efficient process.

It may be expected that in future all technical issues

will be resolved one after another but unfortunately

nuclear fusion is not a short term solution for our present energy problems. The quickest scenario

works with a minimum expectation of 40 years before the first commercial nuclear fusion reactor will be

operational.

Next to hot nuclear fusion from time to time

publications appear about ‘cold fusion’. That would be a very advantageous step as handling of the very hot

plasma cloud could be abandoned. Unfortunately until

today is has not been proved with enough scientific evidence that fusion of nuclei at room temperature is

possible although the original discoverers in 1989 Martin Fleischman (1927, University of Southampton)

and Stanley Pons (1943, University of Utah) still are convinced that this is possible. Thus, it could be

possible that Coulomb’s Law could be circumnavigated

in one way or another. It would be a scientific break-through, however, laboratories working on hot nuclear

fusion shall not be happy with such a development.

Advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power (4 2 5 . Ru the r f o r d ,

Canada 1971, Y455) All around the world

nuclear power is used

today as a form of energy generat ion.

Some countries, however, consider the dangers that great that they abstain from this form of energy

generation. With so many recent oil related political problems the call for nuclear energy is increasing even

in those countries.

By the way, even in those countries who abstain from

their own nuclear energy generation often of such kind of energy is imported. In The Netherlands, where the

use of own nuclear energy is very limited, 8% of its energy consumption is imported nuclear energy, mostly

from France.

Still it cannot be denied that the generation of nuclear

energy causes some serious environmental problems such as:

Risks for major accidents, radio-activity! What do we do with nuclear waste?

With side-products such as plutonium bombs can be

made (proliferation) Very high construction costs for a power plant

Very high maintenance costs Safety problems, radiation is dangerous!

High costs for dismantling

On the other side significant advantages can be noted in comparison with conventional power plants:

No, or very little emission of greenhouse gases (CO2) No air pollution with other gases such as: carbon

monoxide (CO), sulphur oxides (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), dust particles etc.

Little solid waste

Low fuel costs Large fuel reserves

It is difficult to draw a definite conclusion as for every

element one can find supporters or opponents. It is a

fact that supporters often present nuclear energy as a form of cheap, clean energy, denying the problems of

the storage of nuclear waste, which is to me one of the largest problems of the use of nuclear energy, thus a

problem not to be neglected.

It is obvious that opponents use exactly this point to

attack this form of energy as this kind of waste will be present on earth for a very long time and storage, even

locating deep into the earth is not completely without danger because of instability of rock strata.

Hence, the discussion will last and will go on until all fission processes are replaced by fusion, but that will not

be for a hundred years !!!

In the next part of his feature John Beenen

discusses Nuclear reactors in The Space Age

11

ORBIT

Christopher Wren—Astronomer Our Chair Margaret Morris details aspects of the life of Christopher Wren (recently honoured with a beautiful British issue) which perhaps are less well known.

Most people know of Wren as an architect, especially famous for his work

in redesigning the City of London after the Great Fire of 1666. However, it is a

fact that his earlier years were spent in the pursuit of astronomy and this allows

us to include him in a philatelic

Astronomy collection.

Born in 1632 in East Knoyle, Wiltshire, he was the son of a well-connected

clergyman who later became Dean of

Windsor. Wren entered Wadham College, Oxford, in 1646, took his first degree in 1650 and in 1653 became

a Fellow of All Souls. While at Oxford, he

distinguished himself in geometry and applied

mathematics. He seems

to have been gifted in other ways and has been

credited with a number of inventions as well as

m e c h a n i c a l

improvements to, for example, magnets and

pendulums. He also constructed a universal sundial and made maps of the

Moon, Mars and Saturn. He was interested in building techniques – which would prove most useful to him in

his later career. In 1657 Wren became Professor of

Astronomy at Gresham College and in 1660 was elected Savilian Professor of Astronomy at Oxford. In the 1713

edition of “Principia”, Newton spoke highly of him as a geometrician so you can see that he was recognised by

his contemporaries to be a gifted person.

He was a man of his time and his life was shaped by

the Civil War, the outbreak of Plague and of course the Great Fire of London. Following the restoration of the

monarchy, Wren had been appointed by Charles II as

Assistant Surveyor-General of the Royal Works. In this capacity he designed buildings for the universities of

Cambridge and Oxford. In 1665 he went to France to study architecture and was inspired by the domes he

found there. On his return he produced plans for the repair of old St. Paul’s Cathedral which was then in a

state of decay. However these plans were overtaken

by the Great Fire of London which presented Wren with his opportunity to shine as an architect. Although it

destroyed the lives and livelihoods of so many

unfortunates, the Fire marked a special moment in the history of London.

On 13 May 2008 Royal Mail issued a beautiful set

featuring Cathedrals. Six individual stamps illustrated

cathedrals in different parts of the United Kingdom but an associated miniature sheet (above) was devoted to

four views of St. Paul’s Cathedral to commemorate the tercentenary of its completion. Together this block of

four provides us with a superb interior view of Wren’s

masterpiece. An image of the great man himself, from the Closterman portrait held by the Royal Society,

appears at the left hand side of the sheet. It is nice to see this particular portrait instead of the more familiar

one by Kneller which is in the National Portrait Gallery. I think the arrangement of the hands in the Closterman

portrait is particularly pleasing and of course it includes

an image of St. Paul’s.

Associated special cancellations for this issue include one

depicting Wren himself, one

featuring dividers and a number with the great dome of

St. Paul’s. Royal Mail, as usual, issued other money-

making “goodies” such as a Medal Cover and the “Press

Sheet” which contains 16

Miniature Sheets.

12

ORBIT

If you are inspired to form a modest Wren display, you

will find that, looking a little further back, there are earlier related cancellations. Also, you might like to

include stamps depicting a few of the buildings which Wren designed – notably, of course, the old Royal

Observatory at Greenwich which brought together his

skills as astronomer and architect. The Great Fire of London is commemorated on a stamp of St. Helena and

other stamps depict various of Wren’s churches. He also designed the monument which stands at the spot

where the Fire started. It is interesting that the great cathedral was to survive

a later fire of London in

the shape of the Blitz and a number of stamps

commemorate this. St. Paul’s of course appears

on many of the issues

for the wedding of Prince Charles and Lady

D i a n a S p e n c e r . Kensington Palace can

also be included, as well as Hampton Court for

which Wren designed

an extension. You might also consider including stamps depicting some of his famous contemporaries and his

Special cancels for the British Cathedrals issue and right linking Copernicus and Wren, and the Christopher Wren School. Far right cancel illustrating the Old Royal Observatory

Special cancel showing dome of St Paul’s against wartime sky

patron, Charles II, founder of the Royal Society. As

with any other aspect of thematic philately, it depends on how widely you wish to cast your net.

Several astronomers have appeared on banknotes and

Wren is no exception. However, the outlay is rather

higher than for the modest £1 Bank of England note issued in honour of Newton. Wren appears on a £50

Bank of England note! This handsome item features on the back the Closterman portrait, the ground plan

of St. Paul’s and a London view with the great cathedral towering up into a sky in

which the constellations Cepheus and

Andromeda are delineated and named.

If you are interested in peripherals,

there are various medals and

medallions honouring Wren. As already mentioned, Royal Mail and

Royal Mint produced a medallic first day cover for the special issue of 13

May 2008. I have a postcard from t he A l de r P l a ne t a r i um a nd

As t ronomica l Museum wh i ch

illustrates “Two interesting pieces of the seventy in the Tomlinson

13

ORBIT

Collection acquired in 1936. The quadrant here

illustrated was made by Christopher Wren, famous English architect, in the late 17th century”. He gets

everywhere! You could include other postcards of his portrait or buildings.

A more recent commemoration took the form of a Cinderella

stamp produced for the opening of East Knoyle Post Office on 5

August 2006. Strictly speaking, it should mark the re-opening as

this post office had closed in

2004. Due to the special efforts of the local people, a completely

new community shop and post office came into being and a fund-raising cover was

produced. An article about the background to this issue

(“A Cinderella Rides Out” by Bernard Pearson) appeared in Gibbons Stamp Monthly for October 2006.

Wren was reputed to be a rather small and quiet man.

However his achievements speak for themselves. He was knighted in 1673 and elected President of the Royal

Society in 1681. Following a long and active life, in

1723 Wren became ill following a journey to London and died at his home in St. James’s Street at the great

age (for those days) of 91. He was buried in the crypt of his masterpiece – St. Paul’s Cathedral.

Old Postcard showing two items from Adler Planetarium museum — the upper item is Wren’s quadrant.

The stunning display of the British Cathedral silver-coloured stamps within the 2008 Royal Mail presentation pack which also included the quartet of colourful stamps for Wren’s St Paul’s, illustrated on page 11 : surely some of the most beautiful GB stamps ever !?

14

ORBIT

Statue for Spacedog Laika Report by Bert van Eijck

Without much ceremonial show officials of the Air and

Space Medical Institute in Moscow, Russia, unveiled a bronze statue for a dog in front of their building.

However this was not just ‘a dog’, but the most famous one on Earth, even if it died over fifty years ago. This

was the spacedog Laika, picked up from the street,

trained in the Institute, launched into space by rocket and who died there as the first living creature from our

planet.

Laika was a Siberian Pomeranian and was chosen for a glorious moment of the Sovjet regime. For it was state

leader Nikita Krushchev himself who summoned Sergej

Pavlovitsj Korolev, chief rocket designer and father of the first Earth satellite Sputnik, to his office in the

Kremlin. Korolev was ordered to create a spectacular space event for the 40th anniversary of the Russian

Revolution in November 1957. This secret meeting at

the Kremlin took place only three days after the successful launch of Sputnik-1 on October 4, 1957.

Now we know the Sovjet leaders got their triumph, for

within a month, on November 3, 1957 Sputnik-2 climbed into space with on board doggy Laika. The

female animal had metal ties on her body to help her

maintain balance and to protect the measuring apparatus. These ties we can see on the statue of Laika

(see picture).

The Soviet scientists understood from the outset that

the dog was to die inside Sputnik-2 through a lack of

oxygen. It was said at that time Laika had survived for

ten days in space, but now we know better : she died just six hours after launching because of overheating

as the cooler inside the cabin broke down and Laika suffocated. Sputnik-2 made 2370 orbits around Earth

before burning in the atmosphere on April 14, 1958.

The ‘first living creature in space’

even it was a dog, was of course a sensation at that time. It was after

Sputnik-1 another scoop of the Russians. A lot of countries issued

stamps for Sputnik-2 with Laika;

most of these countries were affiliated with the Soviet Union,

like those in Eastern Europe. Laika was honoured on about thirty

stamps and ten stamp sheets/

blocks, not to mention of the many special postal cancellations, postal stationary and first day covers.

This indeed is a collection on itself. (Poland 1964 shown) In the late fifties Laika was proclaimed as a pioneer for

coming manned space flights. Now we believe this was

not the case : it was for sure a political stunt. Pioneers for Sovjet cosmonauts and later American astronauts

are the Russian dogs Bjelka (=squirrel) and Strjelka (little arrow), and the chimps Ham and Enos. These

Yuri Gagarin and John Glenn.

Since then about 500 men and woman from Earth

have gone into space. And there are more to come, first in the International Space Station, perhaps later in

a base on our moon, and in the far future on a colony at our neighbouring planet Mars. But, I very much

doubt if we will witness that event in our life times.

Laika before launch on Sputnik 2—3.11.57 Bjelka and Strjelka after their journey in Sputnik 5

15

ORBIT

From Bert van Eijck

Look at the pictures with this

article. What do you see?

At first glance one sees a non-used USA Aerogramme, issued in

1978, with 22c postage imprinted

and the text NASA Space Shuttle, all printed in blue. Just below this

y o u w i l l n o t i c e “ E S A +logo+Spacelab”, all printed in

red colour.

Sorry, you say? You have not

seen this before? You might like this in your collection, either in

your exhibition ‘USA in Space’ or

‘Europe in Space’? For this seems to be a gem?

Forget it, it’s just a fraud, a fraud

in philately.

This is one of the tricks a German

dealer in philately used in the ‘80’s to sell more astro material to

his customers. Many of them

believed these aerogrammes with extra text were

official, issued by the United States Postal Services (USPS) and therefore a very nice collector’s item. At

that time I believed it too. I do not know how much I paid for that item, but be sure it was a lot more than

for the plain aerogramme.

After suspicious rose, I asked a philatelic pen friend in

USA to send to my home address in the Netherlands – the old one at Planetenlaan 228 in Groningen – the

NASA/ESA aerogramme. Just to see what happened.

Nothing happened! That is, the aerogramme, not a

perfect example of nice cancelling as you can see, came along the normal postal way to my home

address. USPS only “saw” the 22c imprinted USA, and

disregard the red ESA marks. Because this had nothing to do with the instruction to send the aerogramme to

the sender. So, it was not forbidden to print something else on the aerogramme. And therefore this was not

punishable.

And to make sure: do not take this NASA/ESA

aerogramme into your exhibit, unless you mention it as a fraud. Otherwise the jury will punish you for having

fraudulent material in your collection!

May I recommend ?

I received the large

coffee-table style book from my wife as

a surprise Christmas present and what a

delight it is ! writes your Editor. Translated from the original French this handsome 2006 book* by Laurent Lemerle devotes two colourful

pages to a myriad of thematic subjects starting with A History of Mankind (with 25 sub divisions) through

Discoveries, Inventions and Manufacturing (13 divisions

including The Conquest of Space) to Nature (12 divisions).

In all Lemerle illustrates over 3,500 stamps in full

colour introducing each chapter with a brief prologue explaining its context. For those of you who wonder

what other thematicists do, this book is a must and an

inspiration to those who might take up the hobby. Buy it ! *ISBN 0-8109-5519-9 (Cf Amazon website : around £18)

16

ORBIT

Un-manned Satellites on Postage Stamps : 29 By Guest Contributors Don Hillger and Garry Toth

A version of this article first appeared in The Astrophile for ?

This is the twenty-ninth in a series of articles about un-manned satellites on postage stamps. This article features the French FR-1 satellite. FR-1 was successfully launched on 6 December 1965. FR-1 was developed by CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales) but was launched at Vandenberg AFB in California into a near-circular orbit at 750 km. The spacecraft carried two experiments. One was involved with VLF (very low frequency) signals, and the other was to measure the electron density concentration in the magnetosphere and ionosphere. The FR-1 spacecraft consisted of two truncated octagonal pyramids, joined at their bases to an octagonal body about 68 cm across and covered with solar cells. A magnetic field antenna extended from the top of the spacecraft on top of a supporting tube, and an electron density probe extended downward from the base. Four relatively-short telemetry antennas extended diagonally upward from near the top of the spacecraft body. Four 2 m long electric field antenna booms extended radially outward from the body. Nearly all the postage stamps showing FR-1 do a nice job of depicting the spacecraft and its features. Apparently the design was well-publicized, since the various stamp designers drew very similar images of FR-1. As with the A-1 satellite featured in the previous installment in this series of articles, the stamps showing FR-1 were issued primarily by France and its former colonies. Most of the stamps were issued in 1966 and 1967, with a few more from 1971 through 1973. The last items known to show FR-1 are a stamp and a miniature sheet (Scott 587 and 588a) issued by Burundi in 1981.

A checklist of postal items showing FR-1-series

satellites (http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/hillger/FR-1.htm) is available on the Website

developed by the authors for the un-manned

satellites featured in this series of articles (http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/hillger/satellites.htm).

E-mail correspondence is welcome. Don Hillger can be reached at hillger@cira.colostate.edu and Garry

Toth at garry_toth@hotmail.com.

17

ORBIT

18

ORBIT

Flight STS-98 Commander Kenneth Cockrell Pilot Mark Polansky MS Robert Curbeam MS Marsha Ivins MS Thomas Jones KSC Launch Date 7.2.01 EFB Landing 20.2.01 Purpose / Dock with ISS Main Payload Destiny Lab

Shuttle Story : 2001 STS -98, -102, -100, -104, -105, - 108

The ISS’s Destiny

STS-98 was flown to the International Space Station by Atlantis to deliver to the station the Destiny Laboratory Module. Allmission objectives were completed and the shuttle re-entered and landed safely at East Edwards Airport on February 20, after twelve days in space, six of which were spent docked to the ISS. STS-98 occurred while the first

station crew was aboard the new space station.

The Destiny module was to be the primary operating facility for U.S. research payloads aboard the ISS. It was berthed to the Unity module and activated over a period of five days became NASA's first permanent operating orbital research station since Skylab was vacated in February 1974. The Boeing Company began construction of the 16 ton (14.5 imp.t), state-of-the art research laboratory in 1995 at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Destiny was shipped to the Kennedy Space Center in Florida in 1998, and was turned over to NASA for pre-

launch preparations in August 2000.

Astronauts work inside the pressurized facility to conduct research in numerous scientific fields. Scientists throughout the world would use the results to enhance their studies in medicine, engineering, biotechnology, physics, materials science, and Earth science.

The aluminum U.S. laboratory module is 28 feet (8.5 m) long and 14 feet (4.3 m) wide. It comprises three cylindrical sections and two endcones that contain the hatch openings through which astronauts enter and exit

the module. The aft port of Destiny is connected to the forward port of the Unity node, and the forward port of Destiny is connected to the aft port of the Harmony module. A 20-inch (510 mm)-diameter window is located on one side of the centre module segment.

Each of the two berthing ports on Destiny contains a hatch with a window. Both hatches are normally open, and remain open unless a situation arises requiring a module to be isolated. The hatches can be opened or closed from either side. The hatches have a pressure interlock feature, which prevents the hatch from being opened if there is a

negative pressure across the hatch.

Destiny, shown above being installed, has a 20-inch (510 mm) optically pure, telescope-quality glass window located in an open rack bay used primarily for Earth science observations. Station crewmembers use very high quality video and still cameras at the window to record Earth's changing landscapes. A window shutter protects the window from potential micrometeoroid and orbital debris strikes during the life of the ISS. The crew

manually opens the shutter to use the window.

Imagery captured from Destiny's window has given geologists and meteorologists the chance t o s t u d y f l o o d s , avalanches, fires and ocean events such as

plankton blooms in a way never seen before, as well as given international scientists the opportunity to study features such as glaciers, coral reefs, urban growth and wild fires.

19

ORBIT

Flight STS-102 Commander James Wetherbee Pilot James Kelly MS Andrew Thomas MS Paul Richards MS James Voss up MS Susan Helms up MS Yuri Usachev up MS Bill Shepherd down MS Yuri Gidzenko down MS Sergei Krikalev down KSC Launch Date 8.3.01 KSC Landing 21.3.01 Purpose / ISS Crew Rotation Main Payload MPLM

STS-102 was a mission to the ISS flown byDiscovery and

launched from Kennedy Space Center, its primary objectives being re-supplying the Station and rotating the Expedition 1 and

Expedition 2 crews.

STS-102 was the eighth shuttle mission to visit the International

Space Station and served as a crew rotation flight. Discovery delivered the Expedition Two crew to the station and returned the

Expedition One crew to Earth. The primary cargo for the mission was the Leonardo Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM), with six

racks for the U.S.Destiny Laboratory Module which had been delivered and installed onto the station during STS-98. The STS-

102 crew temporarily connected Leonardo to the International

Space Station in order to unload its contents.

There were also two EVAs ("spacewalks") conducted to complete assembly operations. Mission Objectives for the first spacewalk

was for astronauts Susan Helms and Jim Voss to move the shuttle

docking port to make room for the MPLM and attach the Lab Cradle Assembly to the top of the lab. The assembly was to be

used on STS-100 when the Canadarm2 Space Station Remote Manipulator System (SSRMS) was attached to the station. On the

second spacewalk, astronauts Andy Thomas and Paul Richards

attached an External Stowage Platform and a coolant pump to the outside of the Destiny module. A Multi-Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) is a large pressurized container used on Space Shuttle missions to transfer cargo to and from the ISS. It is carried in the cargo bay of the Space Shuttle and berthed to the Unity or Harmony module, where supplies are offloaded and finished experiments and waste are loaded. The MPLM is then reberthed in the Shuttle for return to Earth.

The modules are provided to NASA under contract by the Italian Space Agency (ASI). Three MPLMs were built and delivered to NASA and have names chosen by the ASI to denote some of the great talents in Italian history: Leonardo, Raffaello, and Donatello. While built by ASI, the modules are owned by NASA. In exchange for building the MPLMs, ASI receives access to U.S. research time on the ISS.

The MPLM was originally designed for Space Station Freedom. Initially, it was to be built by Boeing, but in 1992, the Italians announced that they would build a "Mini-Pressurized Logistics Module," able to carry 4500 kg of cargo. After the 1993 redesign, the length was doubled and it was

renamed the "Multi-Purpose Logistics Module." Each empty MPLM is approximately 21 feet (6.4 m) long, 15 feet (4.6 m) in diameter, weighs 4.5 tons, and can deliver up to 10 tons of cargo to the ISS.

In the mission patch design the names of the rotating crew are shown in the bottom section with the swirling ribbons around the craft indicating the crew rotation. The 1 and 2 in the number 102 also signify the numbers of the first ISS expedition crews. Shown mated below the station is the Italian-built Multi-Purpose Logistics Module Leonardo which was to be attached by the crew during the mission. Note the Italian flag above right of the name “Voss”.

The Multi-Purpose Logistics Module in the cargo bay of Discovery on March 10, 2001

20

ORBIT

Flight STS-100 Commander Kent Rominger Pilot Jeffrey Ashby MS Chris Hadfield MS John Phillips MS Scott Parazynski MS Umberto Guidoni MS Yuri Lonchakov KSC Launch Date 19.4.01 EAFB Landing 1.5.01 Purpose / Servicing ISS Main Payload Canadarm2

STS-100 was a mission to the ISS flown by Endeavour to install the ISS Canadarm2 robotic arm. The highest priority objectives of the flight were the installation, activation and checkout of the Canadarm2 robotic arm on the station. The operation of the arm is critical to the capability to continue assembly of the ISS and was also necessary to attach a new airlock to the station on the subsequent shuttle flight, mission STS-104. A final component of the Canadarm is the Mobile Base System (MBS), installed onboard the station during the June 2002 STS-111 flight.

Other major objectives for Endeavour’s mission were to berth the Raffaello logistics module to the station, activate it, transfer cargo between Raffaello and the station, and reberth Raffaello in the shuttle's payload bay. Raffaello is the second of three Italian Space Agency-developed Multi-Purpose Logistics Module that were launched to the station. The Leonardo module was launched and returned on the previous shuttle flight, STS-102, in March.

Remaining objectives included the transfer of other equipment to the station such as an Ultra-High Frequency communications antenna and a spare electronics component to be attached to the exterior during space walks. Finally, the transfer of supplies and water for use aboard the station, the transfer of experiments and experiment racks to the complex, and the transfer of items for return to Earth from the station to the shuttle were among the objectives.

Endeavour also to boosted the station's altitude and perform a flyaround survey of the complex, including recording views of the station with an IMAX cargo bay camera. All objectives were completed without incident, and re-entry and landing happened uneventfully on May 1.

During this mission, astronaut Chris Hadfield (left) made the first spacewalk by a Canadian. The Mobile Servicing System (MSS), better known by its primary component Canadarm2, is a robotic system and associated equipment on the ISS which plays a key role in station assembly and

maintenance: moving equipment and supplies around the station, supporting astronauts working in space, and servicing instruments and other payloads attached to the space station. Astronauts receive specialized training to enable

them to perform these functions with the various systems.

The MSS is composed of the actual arm called Space Station Remote Manipulator (SSRMS), the

Mobile Remote Servicer Base System (MBS) and the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator (SPDM also known as Dextre or Canada hand). The system can move along rails on the Integrated Truss Structure on top of the US provided Mobi le Transporter cart which hosts the MRS Base System.

The MSS was designed and manufactured by MDA Space Missions (previously called MD Robotics; previously called SPAR Aerospace) for the Canadian Space Agency's contribution to the International Space Station.

Astronaut Stephen K. Robinson anchored to the end of Canadarm2 during STS-114 (July 2005)

21

ORBIT

Flight STS-104 Commander Steven Lindsey Pilot Charles Hobaugh MS Janet Kavandi MS Michael Gernhardt MS James Reilly KSC Launch Date 12.7.01 KSC Landing 24.7.01 Purpose / ISS Servicing Main Payload Quest Airlock

The Quest airlock consists of two segments, the "Equipment lock" that stores spacesuits and equipment, and the "Crew Lock" from which astronauts can exit into space. It was derived from the Space Shuttle airlock, although it was significantly modified to waste less atmospheric gas when used. It has mountings for four high-pressure gas tanks, two containing oxygen and two containing nitrogen, which provides for atmospheric replenishment to the American side of the space station, most specifically for the gas lost after a hatch opening during a space walk.

STS-104 was a mission to the ISS flown by Atlantis. Its primary

objectives were to install the Quest Joint Airlock and help perform

maintenance on the Station. It was successful and returned to Earth without incident, after a successful docking, equipment

installation and three spacewalks.

The primary purpose of the flight was to deliver and install the Quest airlock. The Joint Airlock is a pressurized flight element

consisting of two cylindrical chambers attached end-to-end by a

connecting bulkhead and hatch. Once installed and activated, the ISS airlock became the primary path for International Space Station

space walk entry and departure for U.S. spacesuits, which are known as Extravehicular Mobility Units, or EMUs. In addition, the

Joint Airlock is designed to support the Russian Orlan spacesuit for

EVA activity.

The Joint Airlock is 20 ft (6.1 m) long, 13 ft (4.0 m) in diameter and weighs 6.5 short tons (5.9 metric tons). It was built at the Marshall

Space Flight Center (MSFC) by the Space Station Prime Contractor

Boeing. The ISS-airlock has two main components: a crew airlock and an equipment airlock for storing EVA gear and EVA preflight

preps. STS-104 also carries a spacelab pallet with four High Pressure Gas Assembly containers that were attached to the

exterior of the airlock.

Mission Specialists Michael Gernhardt and James Reilly conducted

three space walks while Space Shuttle Atlantis was docked to the International Space Station. They spent a total of 16 hours and 30

minutes outside. During the first space walk, Gernhardt and Reilly assisted in the installation of the airlock, attaching it to the

starboard CBM of Unity. During the second and third excursions,

they focused on the external outfitting of the Quest airlock with four High Pressure Gas Tanks, handrails and other vital equipment.

The third spacewalk was conducted from Quest itself. The Quest Joint Airlock (above right), previously known as the Joint Airlock Module, is the primary airlock for the ISS. Quest was designed to host spacewalks with both EMU and Orlan spacesuits. Before Quest was attached, Russian spacewalks using Orlan suits could only be done from the Zvezda service module and American spacewalks using EMUs were only

possible when a Space Shuttle was docked. The arrival of Pirs on September 16, 2001 was to provide another airlock from which Orlan spacewalks can be conducted.

Mission 7A, as noted on the orbit tail in the mission patch design was to install the Joint Airlock, which can be seen stored inside the payload bay along with four high pressure gas tanks. The Astronaut symbol and US flag dominate the design.

22

ORBIT

Flight STS-105 Commander Scott Horowitz Pilot Frederick Sturckow MS Daniel Barry MS Patrick Forrester MS Frank Culbertson up MS Mikhail Turin up MS Vladimir Dezhurov up MS Yuri Usachev down MS James Voss down MS Susan Helms down KSC Launch Date 19.5.00 KSC Landing 29.5.00 Purpose / ISS Servicing & Main Payload Crew Rotation

STS-105 was a mission by Discovery to the ISS launched from

Kennedy Space Center, Florida, August 10, 2001. This mission would prove to be Discovery's final mission until STS-114, due to

the fact that it was grounded for a refit, and then all Shuttles were grounded in the wake of the Columbia disaster.

The main purpose of STS-105 was the rotation of the ISS crew and the delivery of supplies utilizing the Italian-built Leonardo on its second flight The crew also performed two spacewalks and conducted scientific experiments. The MLPM contained additional scientific racks, equipment and supplies.

Aboard Leonardo were six Resupply Stowage Racks, four Resupply Stowage Platforms, and two new scientific experiment racks for the station's U.S. laboratory Destiny. The two new science racks (EXPRESS Racks 4 and 5) added further science capability to the station. EXPRESS stands for Expedite the Processing of Experiments to the Space Station. EXPRESS Rack 4 weighs 1,175 pounds (533 kg) and EXPRESS Rack 5 weighs 1,200 pounds (544 kg).

The Resupply Stowage Racks and Resupply Stowage Platforms were filled

with Cargo Transfer Bags that contain equipment and supplies for the station. The six Resuppply Stowage Racks contained almost 3,200 pounds (1451 kg) of cargo and the four Resupply Stowage Platforms contained about 1,200 pounds (544 kg) of cargo, not including the weight of the Cargo Transfer Bags, the foam packing around the cargo or the straps and fences that held the bags in place.

Another payload onboard is the Materials International Space Station Experiments (MISSE). This project was a NASA/Langley Research Center-managed cooperative endeavour to fly materials and other types of space exposure experiments on the space station. The objective was to develop early, low-cost, non-intrusive opportunities to conduct critical space exposure tests of space materials and components planned for use on future spacecraft. Johnson Space Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, Glenn Research Center, the Materials Laboratory at the Air Force Research Laboratory and Boeing Phantom Works were participants with Langley in the project. The MISSE experiments were the first externally mounted experiments conducted on the ISS. The experiments were in four Passive Experiment Containers (PECs) that were initially developed and used for an experiment on Mir in 1996 during the Shuttle-Mir Program. The PECs were transported to Mir on STS-76. After an 18-month exposure in space,

they were retrieved on STS-86. PECs are suitcase-like containers for transporting experiments via the space shuttle to and from an orbiting spacecraft. Once on orbit and clamped to the host spacecraft, the PECs

As with STS-102, the STS-105 mission patch symbolises the exchange of the Expedition 2 and 3 crews with three gold stars above the Astronaut Office symbol and two below it relating to the “up” and “down” teams. The exchanging crew names appear in the bottom section of the patch.

are opened and serve as racks to expose experiments to the space environment.

Other payloads onboard were part of the Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops Flight Facility Shuttle Small Payloads Project. The SSPP system utilizes payload carrier systems such as

the Hitchhiker, Getaway Specials and Space Experiment Modules to provide a low cost scientific research environment. SSPP payloads on STS-105 include the Hitchhiker payload Simplesat, The Cell Growth in Microgravity GAS Canister (G-708), the Microgravity Smoldering Combustion experimet (MSC), and the Hitchiker Experiment Advancing Technology Space Experiment Module-10 payload).

23

ORBIT

Flight STS-108 Commander Dominic Gorie Pilot Mark Kelly MS Linda Godwin MS Daniel Tani MS Yuri Onufrienko up MS Carl Walz up MS Daniel Bursch up MS Frank Culbertson down MS Mikhail Turin down MS Vladimir Dezhurov down KSC Launch Date 8.9.00 KSC Landing 20.9.00 Purpose / ISS Servicing Main Payload Crew Rotation

STS-108 was a mission to the ISS flown by Endeavour to deliver

supplies to and help maintain the Station. This was the first mission after the 9/11 attacks.

STS-108 was the 12th shuttle flight to visit the Statio n and the first since the installation of the Russian airlock called Pirs on the station. Endeavour delivered the Expedition Four crew to the orbital outpost. The Expedition Three crew returned to Earth on Endeavour.

While at the station, the crew conducted one spacewalk and attached the Raffaello Multi-Purpose Logistics Module to the station so that about 2.7 metric tons (3 tons) of equipment and supplies could be unloaded. The crew later returned Raffaello to Endeavour's payload bay for the trip home. The hatches were opened between Endeavour and the ISS Destiny Laboratory at 5:42 p.m. EST Dec. 7, enabling the ten crew members to greet one another. The Expedition 3 crew officially ended their 117-day residency on board the International Space Station Dec. 8 as their custom Soyuz seatliners were transferred to Endeavour for the return trip home. The transfer of the Expedition 4 seatliners to the Soyuz return vehicle attached to the station marked the official exchange of crews.

Endeavour Pilot Mark Kelly and Mission Specialist Linda Godwin used the shuttle's robotic arm to lift the Raffaello Multi-Purpose Logistics Module from the shuttle payload bay and attach it to a berth on the station's Unity node. The crews began unloading supplies the same day.

EVA: 4 hours, 12 minutes -- Endeavour astronauts Linda Godwin and Dan Tani completed a four-hour, 12-minute spacewalk to install insulation on mechanisms that rotate the International Space Station's main solar arrays. The two spacewalkers stopped at a stowage bin to retrieve a

cover that had been removed from a station antenna during an earlier flight, and after its return to Earth, may be reused. Godwin and Tani also performed a "getahead;" task, positioning two switches on the station's exterior to be installed on a future shuttle mission, STS-110. The spacewalk completed a record year with 18 spacewalks conducted: 12 originating from the shuttle and six from the station.

Mission managers extended Endeavour's flight to a duration of 12 days to allow Endeavour's crew to assist with additional maintenance tasks on the station, including work on a treadmill and replacing a failed compressor in one of the air conditioners in the Zvezda Service Module.

The astronauts and cosmonauts completed the transfer of more than 5,000 pounds of supplies and material from Endeavour's mid-deck and the Raffaello Multi-Purpose Logistics Module to the station. Then the crew packed up the Raffaello module with items bound for a return trip to Earth.

“UF-1” indicates that this was the first designated Utilisation Flight. Once again the design of the mission patch symbolises the crew exchange with the three stars on the right and the three on the left relating to the arriving and departing ISS Russian/American crews.

ISS Configuration Post STS 105, the previous mission

24

ORBIT

Dr Fritz D. Kessler of Leverkusen in Germany, who has previously contributed two lengthy learned articles to these pages (e.g. on Calendar reform in 2006) now offers you what he says is his final great piece of research— he is 88 – the relevance of which to science is self evident. That stamps can tell stories is a known statement. Less well known is the fact that philately also gives us

information about measuring, e.g. the invention of the "hodometer". The

oldest "model" of a hodo - , odo- or

mileometer meter is

shown on a 1953 stamp of the People's Republic of China, pointing to the period

of the first emperors of China, third century BC. On a

one-axle-wheeled-vehicle a counter is mounted which measures the distance by

the rotations of the wheel. Simpler in its construction

is the odometer, (shown on a Greek stamp of 2006)

invented about one

hundred years later by Heron of Alexandria (Old

Greek Technique).

The "taximeter" precisely drawn and described by M.P.

Vitruvius (10 AD) in his work "De Architectura", Vol.IX was already in use when M.V. Agrippa, who was of

the same age, ordered the first road map to be drawn for the Roman Empire. Distances on Roman Roads were measured in miles.

An example is a beautiful stamp from Spain in 1984

from showing the nun Egeria on her

way to the "Holy Land" riding a

donkey. According to

t h e s t a m p descr ipt ion she

passes a milestone of the "Via Hispania", built by the "Legio Hispania IX".

The Roman basic measure, the "old-Roman" mile was

the equivalent of 1000 (mille) double paces or to 479m, which was in force until the first meter-

convention. This distance, however varied according to the law of the country.

Mileometers existed

also at the time of August d. Starken

(1670-1733), elector of Saxony and King of

Poland. Responsible for

the construction of these mileometers was

his architect Adam Friedrich Zürner (1679 -

1742). Zürcher defined the new measurement the distance travelled by the single rotation of the wheel

with a radius of 3,53 m the "Rute" (c. 10-14 ft). In this

way and by decree of the ruler of the country the roads of Saxony were now 'measured'. Beautiful and ornate

postal mileometer were erected, also for the distance of a quarter and half a mile, as seen on this 1984 set of

the DDR.

Distinctly recognisable on separate geodetic pillars even

information on hourly distances was given.

It seems suitable to mention here another, modern

odometer depicted on the 2004 Indian block of stamps:

see more about this below, some pages on. This mileometer was used at the Great Indian Triangulation

at the end of the 19th century. Although a little hidden it gives relevant information for today's use of road

construction and land survey.

The closer investigation of a French

stamp, issued on the occasion of the 10th Congress for weights and

measures 1954 in Paris should also be of interest: Behind a globe an

angel-like figure is measuring with

dividers the quadrant of a meridian. Fascinating is the text which reads:

"A tout les temps - à tout les

Measuring and Surveying on Stamps by guest contributor Fritz Kressler

as shown on this 1971 stamp of the former DDR

25

ORBIT

peuples" (for all times and for

all peoples), so the allegory is actual ly signifying the

"système metrique". The phrase was coined by A.C. Condorcet (1743-1793) who

was then President of the French National Assembly in

1792. On the occasion of the bicentenary of the French

Revolution in 1989 he is portrayed on a block of four

stamps.

The picture of the "Globe" on the stamp of 10th

Congress for weights and measures was, first of all, to be a reminder of the Greek philosopher Parmenides (6th cent. BC) and his statement "the earth is a

sphere". This was taken up and confirmed by Eratosthenes (3rd cent. BC) in his calculation of the

earth being a sphere.

In pursuing this topic we find that the French stamp is

similar to the one of Argentina in 1948. On the

occasion of the Pan-American Congress for Cartography Argentina chose a stamp depicting a

globe with dividers above a map! Another stamp at the event of this congress makes the leap into modern

times quite clear: The mythological "Hero" Atlas carries the firmament on his shoulders, actually the "earth" is

a sphere. France however, wanted to express

something else with the stamp mentioned above: Not man is the measure of all things, he through whom the

whole jumble of different measurements like span, hand's breadth, yard, foot, etc. were invented, the

Earth but is the foundation on which the allegoric

figure measures with the dividers exactly that part of the quadrant of the meridian as defined by the

National Assembly (see above).

At this point too, the Greek philosopher Hipparchos of Nizäa (2nd cent. BC) needs to be mentioned. A stamp

issued by Greece in 1965

reminds us of his "discovery" of latitudes and longitudes,

which he named "Meridians" and the "Equator" to boot.

The stamp shows the co-

ordinates by means of the

"armillarsphere" (astronomic instrument used for

measuring spheres =Gr.-sphaira).

"From both, surveying in antiquity and astronomy, trigonometry came into existence." (Bertelsmann Lex.)

The Dutchman Wilibrord Snell van Rojen, lat. Snellius

(1591-1626) carried out the first survey between Alkmaar and Leiden by means of the base-line and

trigonometry. Since the time of Eratosthenes nineteen centuries before, the survey between Malvoisine and

Amiens (1669/79) by the French astronomer and geodesist J. Picard (1620-1682) was the foundation of

a first exact and modern fixing of the circumference of

the earth at 39,800 km. His work was completed in 1689 by the director of the Paris observatory J.D. Cassini (1625-1712). His son and successor C.F. Cassini caused in 1744 the great survey of France to be done

by means of trigonometry and so first ordnance map of

France was made. J.D. Cassini is depicted in a

set called "Important Persons" who visited the

twin-islands of St. Pierre et Miquelon (stamp shown issued in 1968)

onthe NE coast of Canada. With wig and compass he is characterised as a

contemporary of Newton and geodesist as well. With his final definition of the Mars Parallax (21.07.1678),

Cassini most probably wanted to find out with these

calculations the radius of earth. Almost at the same time, in 1672, the calculation of the Mars parallax was

done by J. Richer (1630-1696) in Peru, which was such an important matter for the astronomers.

The measuring of sections of the meridian arc, i.e. the connecting line between the two poles received new

impetus because of the controversy between the two astronomers Isaac Newton (1643-1727) and Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695), concerning Newton's theory gravity (1678) and the flattening of the earth.

To settle the dispute once and for all the "Academie Royale de Sciences" sent two expeditions to measure

the length of a meridian degree close to the Equator

and near the Arctic Circle. The theory was proven correct.

Of the two expeditions one group under the leadership

of Pierre Moreau de Maupertuis (1698 1759) together

with A. Celsius (1701-1744)) went from 1736 till 1737

Monaco 1987 and Netherlands 1928

26

ORBIT

to Lapland. On the 250th anniversary (1986) Finland

marked this event by a special stamp issue.

The other expeditionary group were to measure the

length of a degree of meridian at the equator in the

highlands of Quito (or "the Lands of the Equator"). Ecuador (1936) commemorated this second expedition

arranged by The Royal Academy of Sciences at the bicentenary with a special issue showing the portraits

of C. M. La Condamine (1701-1774), P. Bouguer (1698-1758) and L. Godin (1704-1760) and a map extract

shown on block 126.

In 1986, the 250th anniversary of this geodesic mission

in Ecuador was celebrated with the issue of three stamp values, i.e. the portraits of P. V. Maldonado (1704–1748) and C. M. La Condamine and the Equator

monument. The "Monumento de la Linea Ecuatorial" can be found on issues of 1949, 1953 and 1998.

France as the actual organiser of these difficult expeditions honoured both, Maupertuis and Condamine

with a special issue in 1986. Their portraits in front of a globe remind us of the surveys of parts of 1°

Longitude.

The few geodisists found on stamp images were

exactly those who were epoch-making and of influence far beyond the boundaries of their home countries.

Croatia for example drew in 1943 the attention on Ruder Boskovic (1711-1787). The stamp portrays him

as astronomer and rightly so, because he founded the observatory of Bergamo. Employed by the former papal

states he surveyed the distance between Rimini and

Rome which included the difficult crossing of the Apennines between the years 1751-1753. He died

shortly before the introduction of the Metric System.

Yugoslavia honoured the Slovene Juri Vega (or Georg Baron of Vega (1754-1802) for surveying the East Alps.

On his 200th birthday (1954) he is portrayed on the

stamp set of "Famous Persons". and by Slovenia in 1994.

Less well known in his own country, but famous for his

surveys in the alpine regions is the Tyrolese Peter Anich (1723-1766). He surveyed and mapped the whole of

the Tyrol. On the 1966 Austrian memorial stamp one can see the globes he made himself. The terrestrial

together with the celestial globe are kept in the museum of Innsbruck.

Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) one of the most famous mathematicians of 18th century made an essential

contribution to this topic in 1735 with his work "Principes de la Trigonometrie". The French title could

refer to his activity in Petersburg where he took on the

department for Geography in 1735. (DDR 1983) The two friends C. F. Gauß (1777-1855) and F.W. Bessel (1784-1846), the one famous as mathematician the other as astronomer, made important contributions

towards practical surveying in the kingdom of Hanover, Prussia respectively. In a collection "Den müßt ihr

kennen" Gauß's survey activity is connected with the

"master of arithmetic" Adam Riese (1492-1559), not because of their real importance but because both of

them having had to earn their living by geodetic work. (DDR 1977 and W.Germany 1984 & 1959)

The Struve family was as important to the Russians as were The Cassinis in the fields of Geodesy and

Astronomy. Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve (1793-1864) for instance, was the spiritual Father of surveying

the 52nd parallel between Greenwich and Warsaw,

which was only finalised in 1863/4. (USSR 1964)

Parallel to the measuring of grade lines "triangulation-survey" became almost a race between various

countries. On the initiative of Cassini France was the first country having produced a map of her territory on

a scale 1:86 4000. In England major-general William Roy (1726-1790) started in 1783 the so-called "Principal Triangulation of Great Britain", (Perier), not fully utilised

until 1858.

Especially well depicted on the Indian stamps (shown above on page 24) is the "Great Indian Survey" of 1804 under Colonel W. Lambton on the occasion of its

bicentenary: "The foundation of future topographical surveys". Lambton and his Indian surveyors managed

to survey the distance of over 1000 km from Cape Comorin to Mt Everest. The triptych suggests the

triangulation network with underlying odometer and

sextant.

Another bicentenary, "200 years Hydrography", was celebrated by Norway 1985 with a stamp showing

sextant and a hydrographic map.

27

ORBIT

Unique by way of content is Austria’s 1967

commemorative on the occasion of 150 years of the land register, i.e. the empire of Austria concluded in

1817 the cartographic registration of all her provinces, 50 years after the death of Peter Anich (q.v.). The

Michel-catalogue remarks of this unique special issue:

"The monument was erected at the northern end of the base route Wien-Neustadt for the calculation of

basic or flat rates" (Trigonometric Point). Cyprus celebrated 1979 the centenary of land

registration by Lord H.H. Kitchener (1850-1916): his portrait next to the map of Cyprus being divided into

grid squares. The two end points of the base line are

still marked today as 'Trigonometric Points' (TP) and are especially well secured.

Triangulation network because of the "Conversion to

the Metric System of Weights and Measures" is seen

best on the stamp of the East-African-Community (founded 1967), Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda, on

which the geodisist instructs with a sextant his assistant, who with the rod marks the point of the next

triangle.

Further stamps "from around the world" illustrate the

art of survey…… Uruguay 1991 announces "160 Years Direction of

Topography", the image showing sextant and surveyor's rod, Thailand's issue presents itself in

similar fashion in 1991 and North Korea 1992 (not

shown) depicts a survey troupe with orders of land-surveying.

Switzerland, one of the homes of trigonometry,

presents two stamps of that kind: one in 1998 (right) shows a TP in the high mountains (graphic diagram),

the other an ensemble on the topic;

a Turkish stamp of 1970 shows a TP

and, once more a 1975 Swiss stamp on which a

geodisist is seen against the background of mountainous contour lines.

By the same idea Czechoslovakia shows contour lines

on a stamp with a cheerful surveyors' team in front of

it.

Nautical geodesy was an understood matter of fact by

the great discoverers like J. Cook (1728-1779) or R. Fitzroy (1805-1916), Captain of the "Beagle". Stamps,

however, concerning this topic are very rare indeed!

One example of survey by ship is given by Hungary.

On the 150th anniversary of his death (but issued in 1995) Hungary produced a stamp with the image of

the surveyor Pál Vásárhely (1795-1846) on a ship.

On a larger scale air survey was done as seen on Finish stamps (150 years land survey in 1962) or on

the 1992 one of Turkish-Cyprus with a TP.

As was done during the "National Week of Cartography" the Republic of Gabon issued also a

stamp for the "Year of Cartography in Africa" in 1986

showing a satellite over Gabon being part of Africa.

The next part of his feature Dr Kessler explains the process of

Going Metric

28

ORBIT

ASTEROIDS Some Bits and Pieces

New ASSS Airmail Etiquette Above is a reproduction of Alec Bartos’ specially commissioned design for ASSS use in 2009, the 40th anniversary of the landing of Apollo XI. For full details see page 34 of Orbit for January. If you wish to order some copies for your own use please email Alec in Romania at alec.bartos@gmail.com.

Is there a Chandra Stamp ?

Bert van Eijck writes to ask if there is portrait stamp for 1983 Nobel prize winner Subrahmanyan Chandrasekar (1910-95) the astrophysicist whose

named is connected with STS-93, the “Chandra” Mission : see Orbit for January page 19. Bert is aware of this I n d i a n s t a m p f o r S am an t a Chandrasekar (1835-1904) who was known as “the greatest naked eye astronomer”. On the stamp we see stars and a so-called Gola Yantra which he used for measuring planetary positions. Bert wonders if there is a family connection between the two men ?

Ad Astra Journal Published by A.I.A.

The first edition (November 2008) of this new full colour journal has been produced by our newly formed sister society in Italy - Associazione Italiana Astrofilatelia. It is a bilingual production with almost all text both in Italian and in English and is available by email from former ASSS member Umberto Cavallaro, who is pictured on the front cover with fellow AIA members who had the pleasure of meeting veteran

astronaut Walter Cunningham in Rome. The journal also includes an interesting feature interviewing US space stamps designers Paul and Chris Calle. For access to AIA material see www.asitaf.it and ucavallaro@alice.it.

Shuttles for Sale

The Times of 19.12.08 carried an article “Nice Runner, 278 million miles, one owner, just £27m, informing that

NASA is now looking for homes for its three remaining shuttle craft Endeavour, Atlantis and Discovery once

they are retired, scheduled for late 2010. One is

already earmarked for the Smithsonian Institute.

29

ORBIT

How Czechoslavakia celebrated Soviet and other Spaceflight Achievement

Brief Historical Context Czechoslovakia was a sovereign state in Central Europe that existed from October 1918 (upon declaring

its independence from the Austro-Hungarian Empire)

until 1992 (with a government-in-exile during the World War II period).

From 1945–1948 Czechoslovakia was a country

governed by a coalition government with Communist

ministers (including the prime minister and minister of interior) playing leading roles. Then from 1948–1989 it

was a Communist country with a centrally planned economy (and from 1960 onwards officially a Socialist

Republic). On January 1, 1993, Czechoslovakia peacefully split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Ex Wikipedia

Czechos lovak ia was

amongst the first counties to follow the Soviet Union

with space issues after

the launch of the first unmanned satellites in

October and November 1957 and for many years

thereafter was very faithful to the USSR in honouring its space

achievements . Its first space issue was on 20.12.57

when SG 1012/4 marked International Geophysical Year with three stamps, the highest value of which

referred to Sputnik 2, though it shows a generic or fantasy version of a space rocket owing to the then

secrecy in which the Soviet programme was shrouded.

After a couple of symbolic

spaces i s sues fo r international conferences

in 1958 and 1959, the failure (to hit the Moon)

of Luna 1 is ignored but

the successful repeat mission Luna 2 was commemorated on 23.9.59 with SG

1111.

The first long space set from this country came out on

6.3.61 with seven stamps (SG 1209-14, shown right) covering such missions as Luna 1 and 3, flights to

Venus and Gagarin’s coming flight which is treated in a representational way. This same design was then

reissued with different values and colours the day after

the first manned

spaceflight (SG 1220/1 on 13.4.61)

Later in the same year

two stamps marked the

triumphant visit of Gagarin to various

European capital cities including Prague : SG

1237/8 on 22.6.61.

A second long set, issued on 26.3.62 (SG 1285-90,

below) acknowledges American achievement for the first time e.g. showing Thor and Telstar 1 as well as

Soviet Cosmos, Luna and proposed flights.

30

ORBIT

Issues treating cosmonautics in a symbolic way followed

in August and November 1962 before another long set at the start of the following year: SG 1349-54 on

25.4.63, a sort of Cosmonautics Day issue, covering Sputniks, and proposed flights to Mars, Jupiter and

Saturn. The associated mini-sheet which uses the 1Kcs

design for Mars exploration appears on page 28 of this issue.

For the joint flight of Vostoks 5 and 6, a design used in the 1962 long set is amended with different colours and

values and added cosmonauts’ faces : SG 1367-8 on

26.6.63.

Almost exactly a year after the 1963 long set the biggest space set yet

was issued to mark all the USSR and

US manned flights to date: SG 1416-23 on 27.4.64 e.g. Gordon Cooper in

Mercury 7. This was complemented on 12.12.64 by this mini-sheet

celebrating the first three man flight

in October 64.:

By now a very distinctive style of space issue can be

detected with fine line drawings being used with muted colours to create an engraved-like appearance

and additionally making each stamp very tactile.

The first space issue of the following year (Year of the

Quiet Sun) includes stamps which depict the future of space travel (SG 1466-72 on 15.3.65) as well current

satellites like the Luna, and Tiros and the Kosmos series (60h and 2Kcs values, respectively).

The following month’s traditional April space issue (SG

1480-3 on 17.4.65) concentrates on the first two man flights by the USSR and by the US, showing Belayev

with Leonov on his first space-walk and Grissom & Young.

There is no April 1966 issue with the long space set not coming out until September of that year, again

marking international achievement: SG 1606-11 on

31

ORBIT

26.9.66 with a set which is much smaller in size than

what we had become used to.

The 1967 Space Research issue (SG 1639-44 of 24.3.67) comprises half a dozen very busy stamps with

loads of detail etched in relating to mainly American

manned and unmanned flights such as Gemini and Apollo and OGO5 and Telstar...

Nothing then until the celebration of

Apollo XI’s Moon

landing. SG 1 8 3 9 - 4 0 o f

21.7.69 certainly c a n n o t b e

accused of being

at all cliché (like so many issues at

t h e t i m e ) , showing scenes

from the surface

of the Moon over aerial views of

Manhattan and J.F.K. airport and

having labels appended underneath each stamp representing man on the moon symbolically.

After a fleeting reference to Jules Verne with one stamp issued on 31.8.70 the space research issue for this year

concentrates mainly on the Intercosmos programmes : SG 1919-24 of 30.11.70 and this international

cooperative programme is also

the subject of the single space issue the next year with the same

design format : SG 1997 of 15.11.71.

1973 saw a real Cosmonautics Day issue with six stamps on

12th April as SG 2094-99 which, beside issues for Venus 8, Intercosmos 1

and Lunakhod, includes the very remarkable and possibly macabre and controversial

tributes to the US astronauts killed in the

Apollo 1 fire, to the cosmonauts of the Soyuz 1 and 11 disasters and to Yuri Gagarin, who

had died five years before. Curiously this stamp shows a cosmonaut dying amid

entangled parachute lines. Three of these

designs were also available in block form with white plain margins. The 3 Kcs stamp

for the Soyuz deaths is also available as a variety with a lined background. This single

stamp is currently offered for sale by Postbeed for €16.

Two stamps in 1974 feature observatory antennae: SG

2162 (30.4.74 also depicting a Molniya satellite) and SG 2189 (within the 9.10.74 U.P.U. set).

“very remarkable and

possibly macabre and controversial

tributes”

32

ORBIT

The big space event of

1975 was of course the Apollo-Soyuz Test Project

which receives a five stamp issue on 30.9.75 (SG 2240

-44), which also includes

images of Soviet satellites and Copernicus in the

intricate symbolic and designs. The large

handshake issues was also available as a souvenir

sheet contains four stamps

and a themed label.

There is a single space issue the

following year : SG

2317 on 18.12.76, a Stamp Day issue

r e f e r r i n g t o Intercosmos 1, as a

modern means of communication.

Twenty years of space research is commemorated on

4.10.77 with five very colourful stamps (SG 2376-71) which include portraits of major space related

personalities— Korolev, Gagarin, Leonov, and Armstrong with abstract illustration in the background.

One of these designs (SG 2387-88 of 2.3.78) is amended and overprinted

to commemorate for the first time

the Intercosmos flight which carried a Czechoslovak cosmonaut, Soyuz 28

on 2nd March carrying Vladimir Remek with Soviet commander

Alexei Gubarev.

A full treatment of this historic flight, the first in the

manned Intercosmos series which lasted for over ten years, is given exactly a year later : SG 2449-53 on

2.3.79 which shows in great detail several aspects of the mission.

The issue is complemented

with an elegant m i n i s h e e t ,

shown below in imperf format.

33

ORBIT

The following year on Cosmonautics Day an issue of five

stamps marks entirely Soviet space achievement: SG 2517-21 of 12.4.80 including putting a mouse into orbit

on the 50h value. This is complemented by a mini-sheet marking the countries which had so far

participated in the Intercosmos manned programme.

A handsome mini-sheet issued on

5.4.81 marks 20 years of manned spaceflight showing a smiling Yuri

Gagarin, the return flight of a space capsule and emblems representing the

flown cosmonauts of partner nations in

the Intercosmos programme to date.

Single issues in late 1982 also have

space related themes : SG 2647 (29.10.82 for the 30th anniv of the

Academy of Sciences) and SG 2649 for the 65th anniv of the October

revolution (not shown).

The fifth anniversary of the Soyuz

28 flight is commemorated with a striking mini-sheet on Cosmonautics Day 1983,

reprising the design used in the mini-sheet issued in 1979.

The Cosmonautics Day issue the following year is the fullest and

busiest yet with five designs

relating Salyut missions produced in triptych format either side of

Intercosmos symbology, shown below and opposite top.

(SG 2724-28 of 12.4.84).

34

ORBIT

The rest of the 1984 Cosmonautics Day issue, marking flights to Salyut.

On 12th June 1984 Czechoslovakia celebrated 110

years of the U.P.U. with a space related issue, opposite

top which in its busy design includes the launch of a Soyuz rocket in the bottom right hand corner of the

sheet.

A year later the Cosmonautics Day theme was the

investigation by probe of Halley’s Comet (below) and though there was no issue in 1986, 1987 saw 20 years

of the Intercosmos Programme marked with an issue that referenced the flight of Soyuz 28 in 1978

(opposite).

The Remek/Gubarev stamp within that mini-sheet was reproduced in souvenir format for PRAGA 88

International Philatelic Exhibition with two issues of

15.11.87 and 15.6.88 with minor differences in design but both are collectable for

completists.

Also in 1987 a stamp for the 30th anniv of the Organisation

of Socialist Countries Postal

Administrations included an

aerial dish for collecting

satellite data (SG 2896 of 22.9.87) as did a 27.3.89

issue (SG 29744) in an set to mark Shipping

systems.

The last space issue for Czechoslovakia before it divided

into the Czech Republic and Slovakia was the Europa issue of

6.5.91 (SG 3059) depicting the

Magion satellite.

35

ORBIT

The Limits of Space Travel By John Beenen UFO

Part 5: Close encounters of the Fourth kind: Abductions

Encounters of the fourth kind, mostly called

‘abductions’ by their nature of mystery speak the most to people. On the other hand they are the most suspect

as especially these can be the product of tormented

minds. In any case they are attractive for our area of collection as very nice looking stamps are issued in this

field.

The most well-known are a series of blocks of Nicaragua describing a couple of very strange

‘encounters’ indeed (9324 NIC 1B/8B).

19 December 1961, New Hampshire, USA: Y: 234, M: 219, Sc:2025, L: 5B (above( (501) A married couple driving home through the White Mountains noticed they were being followed by

what looked like an aeroplane without wings with

flashing coloured lights. This object began to glow and a sense of drowsiness came over them. 35 miles down

the road they regained their faculties, and could not explain their loss of time and place. Under hypnosis by

a doctor their recalled being stopped and abducted by figures in dark jackets, short in stature and hairless.

The doctor was convinced they did not lie.

21 August 1956, Kentucky, USA Y: 227, M: 216, Sc: 2022, L: 3B (right) (502) At a farmhouse near Hockinsville, a family saw a

bright light in the sky descending near them – then some strange creatures coming towards them. They

were described as being just over three foot tall with

huge elephant like ears. The family had a good reputation. No corrobation of their sightings could be

found.

28 July 1965, Argentina Y:226, M: 214, Sc: 2021, L:2B (Below)

(503) A 17 year old student was riding his motorcycle

near the city of Paiana when it began to stall, and suddenly noticed a bizarre looking creature by the side

of the road. It was very tall, six or seven feet tall with a melon shaped head and long stark white hair. Most

intriguing of all it appeared to have three eyes, all staring fixed without moving. There were reports of a

luminous flying object travelling at high speed near that

area at the time of his reported encounter.

6 May 1973, Texas, USA Y: 239A, M: 221, Sc: 2027, L: 8B (see top of left column p 36)

(504) A family was returning home when they noticed what appeared to be a light in the sky that seemed to

follow them for many miles until they reached home.

Years later, under hypnosis, one of the women revealed she had seen two aliens at the time,

approximately three feet in height, large heads, long dark clay like nails on each of their long curved fingers,

and very thin almost skeletal, giving the appearance

that if you were to touch them they would pop. Although they never spoke they seemed to

communicate telepathically.

36

ORBIT ORBIT

27 September 1976, Canaries Y: 237, M: 220, Sc: 2026, L: 6B (above)

(505) A respected medical doctor and his driver spotted what they described as an enormous

transparent UFO hovering over the Canaries with live figures inside. They were described as being human in

appearance except for their wing like appendages at

the end of their arms and their large bright eyes. Other witnesses corroborated their testimony of the UFO

sighting.

25 October 1978, Pennsylvania, USA Y: 231, M: 215, Sc: 2023, L: 4B (above)

(506) Several eyewitnesses reported seeing a red ball

of light hovering above a field on the outskirts of Uniontown. As they approached it they saw two large

ape-like creatures with glowing green eyes. They were

between seven and eight feet tall, covered with long grey hair, with arms so long they practically dragged on

the ground. Upon investigation, police reported hearing something crushing into the nearby underbrush, but no

evidence of the reported creatures could be found.

7 November 1989, Kansas, USA: Y: 239, M: 219, Sc: 2025, L: 7B (above)

(507) Two women driving home on interstate slightly

after midnight suddenly observed two bright lights in

the sky. Under hypnosis, they both related similar reports of being taken aboard a craft by alien life

forms. These extraterrestrials were reported as being slender, with large hairless heads, slanted non blinking

eyes, and four long slender fingers on each hand. Neither woman had ever seen or expressed any belief

in UFO’s before.

(508) 21 July 1991, Missouri, USA Y: 225, M: 217, Sc: 2020, L: 1B

Three young girls noticed a white oval shaped light

moving rapidly in a corner of their yard, then standing

there was a strange creature. Each girl, separately described this creature as thin with long slender

fingers, bald egg shaped head, with ridges along the top. It was also described as having a transparent

abdominal area. All witnesses were considered as

reliable and displayed considerable consternation and fright after this encounter.

37

ORBIT

Also a series of

Paraguay (We ebau

885/93, Y: 1626/32, PA

797/8, M: 3051/9) shows a number of extremely

creepy aliens which you would not like to meet

in the dark (509,

510).

The most classical story of an abduction is that of the married couple Betty and Barney Hill on 19

September 1961 between Montreal and Portsmouth in the state of New Hampshire.

After a couple of hours driving on a deserted highway they saw in the air a lighted, hovering object. Hill

stopped the car and looked at the object with binoculars. Betty Hill, a convinced UFO believer, was

certain that this object was a flying saucer. They saw

creatures behind the windows. Frightened they drove away in panic. Being home they noticed that they

appeared to have lost some hours. During the next few weeks especially Betty behaved in a very confused way

and dreamt that in the night in question they were

taken away from their car by aliens. After some time they sought psychiatric help.

Under hypnosis both told a

remarkably identical story: they had been laid on an operating

table in the craft and from Barney

sperm and from Betty eggs cells were taken away. They described

the aliens as small, with very large eyes, nearly no nose and greyish

of colour, dressed in similar suits.

It has since been proven that no such hypnosis

techniques are valid and also Betty has been described as mentally very unstable. In 1966 John Fuller wrote a

rather sensational story about this abduction, called: ‘The interrupted Journey’.

On the Internet I found a list of ten of the most striking abductions:

Some of them have occurred a very long time ago, but

an interesting case happened in 1970 1970 in

Imjarvi, Finland, where a farmer, Esko Viljo, and a lumberjack, Aarno Heinonen, were ski-ing and suddenly

found themselves amidst a strange, red mist.

From this mist loomed a flying saucer transmitting a

dazzling bright ray of light, through which the men lost consciousness. Later they awakened on the slope of a

mountain. Both claimed to have seen a troll like figure. They were treated for sunburn but the doctors were

also thinking of exposure to radioactivity. Heinonen later declared that he had been in a strange space

surrounded by aliens

who had told him that they had put an

apparatus in his head to ease communication.

Since then, the Finn

claimed to have specific psychic gifts. But all

can also be the effect of a severe sunburn, of

course. However, the event appeared on the sheet of Tanzania as 9900 TAN 4.

.

Even more appealing is a case from New York of 1989 where Linda Napolitano (Linda Cortile) from

Manhattan allegedly had been transported by aliens from the window of her apartment through the air to a

UFO, where she received an intensive medical

examination. In itself this could have been the result of a unbridled imagination as it would not have been

observed by a spectator who saw a woman flying through the air escorted by a greyish creature. Also

corroboration came from not one spectator but two policemen. Unfortunately, at investigation, these

spectator(s) never have been traced and the story was

told by the very doubtful Budd Hopkins as said before. In short, this was probably completely invented or the

was the result of a disturbed mind.

Also from The Netherlands some cases of such

abductions have been reported. Since her childhood Saskia de Jong had seen light bulbs changing into

small creatures whom with she played. At an older age she was abducted to a space ship

where she underwent all kinds of

medical investigation. She even claims to have carried a foetus of

a hybrid child and has seen this ch i l d a f t e rwa rds . Fur the r

examination showed that she had s m a l l i m p l a n t s . M e d i c a l

investigation of such implants by

other people only increased the obscurity because of the fact that

the presence of such metal particles in the body was inexplicable. However, other ‘implants’ were found to

be all sorts of metal pieces such as bits of staples,

needles and nails which had been introduced unnoticed into her body. Strangely enough mother and daughter

showed the same experiences. Also a certain Ben A. speaks about such encounters.

However, their stories are rather similar to that of

Kathy Davis (pseudonym of Debby Thomey) who

claims that under hypnosis egg cells of her womb were taken and later fertilized hybrids (partly Earth, partly

alien) were replaced in her womb to be taken out afterwards. This was allegedly to have taken place

more than once and also she claimed to have seen the

children.

38

ORBIT

Unfortunately this story is anothers of Budd Hopkins !

Another such case is reported from the Soviet Union.

Viktor Kostrykin from Naltsjik allegedly saw a UFO on the night of 6 to 7 July 1968 at Chroesjta-Zyrt (in

itself the name of a space city). An alien in a silver

shining space suit called him in the space ship, where also five other aliens were present. They took a piece

of skin from him and also rooted about with their hands in his body. They claimed to need the piece of skin to

cultivate human entities from.

After that experience he was put down at an other

place. After this time his abilities for extra-sensorial observations had increased strongly and he could

remove pain, heal patients and staunch bleedings. Also he could stop engines with just his mind, trace lost

objects and ‘hear’ what was spoken at distances, even

through concrete walls. In the meantime it is not surprising that Kostrykin also internationally is a strong

advocate of the phenomenon UFO.

In the book ‘The Soviet dossier UFO’ of Colonel Marina Popovitch, also more of such interesting cases are

mentioned. Some others:

Vladimir Prokovjef uit Zaporozje North of the

Black Sea on 29 May 1989 went home when he saw some figures in the field about 100 meters away. The

two men and a woman invited him to fly with their

space ship. He would not do that and tried to drive away on his motorcycle but it was lifted and brought

into the space ship. Afterwards he did not remember anything and was left behind some 15 km away in a

wheat field, without any trace of a motor track and no

increase of the amount of kilometres on his mileage recorder. After that he showed many signs of physical

inabilities and also his watch was not running properly.

Even less comfortable was the encounter of Leonid Koeznetsov from St.Petersburg searching with his

wife and dog for cranberries when they discovered a

ball shaped vehicle from which three very long creatures were descending with long arms and many

fingers.

At first the creatures did not seem to take much notice

of them but broke off branches from a fir tree putting them in trays. One of the creatures tried to make

contact but the dog made to attack the creature and just disappeared in the air when he had jumped two

meters. At the last moment the man tried to shoot at the creature but the shot did not go off. The

subsequent day returning to the place they found the

remains of the dog with its belly cut open and the fir completely charred. In the surroundings he also found

that a piece of soil of about 6 m2 and 40 to 50 cm depth was missing.

Anatoli Popov from Kirgizia describes a

morepeaceful encounter with a ‘top like’ space ship. Approaching it and touching it he found it opened and

he saw two extraterrestrial entities. He felt an intense sense of quietness and got the idea that the two

strangers were a little bit afraid of him. He sat down

and felt hungry and received a dish with a kind of cereal It looked like a giant wheat grain with white

roots. He pulled them off and ate them, the taste was a little bit sweet. After ‘dinner’ they let him go. According

his feelings he had been inside for not more than 10 minutes but at home he appeared to have been away

fro two nights.

Finally the story of Dina

Sjarkirova from Tadjikistan who on 28 May 1990 walked

home from school. Back at home

she became very hot and got a heavy headache and saw a dazzling

bright light. When she opened her eyes she saw a large sphere in

front of her window, from which two robots descended with metal

like sparkling suits and besides a

woman in a black and white dress, who ordered her to fly away with them. She refused, but when she

regained consciousness she felt a severe pain in her right leg and was transported to the hospital quickly. At

the leg an orange coloured symbol, looking like a

brand, was visible. The skin, however, was smooth as before and the spot was not

removable anymore.

It is striking that the aliens as

described show more or less all the same characteristics. Most look

more or less like foetuses, that is to say, having bald, large eyes,

large head and communicating telepathically. Hence, psychologists

think that in such a kind of

psychical disorder possibly the archetype of a foetus is reproduced.

However, this does not count for the world of Viktor Kostrykin (top

left) who describes his entities as

well shaped, slim with majestic gestures, sympathetic and with a

peculiar radiant warmth. But they also had large eyes widening to the

temples, giving the impression that they could look in all directions.

Their hair was grey and cut shortly.

Their face was without wrinkles and youthful.

But in the stories also other types

appear, from giants three meters of

39

ORBIT

length to dwarfs of 90 cm, but all with very long arms. At the time ufology is already so sophisticated that experts classify the entities into three main types; Their general name is EBE’’s (Extraterrestrial Biological Entities): 1. ‘Greys’, also called: ‘Alpha-Aliens’ or Insectoïds. 2. These can be even further classified in three subclasses. Their general characteristics are: bald, large head, greyish appearance, limited facial characteristics, such as: no nose, and large slant-eyed. They communicate telepathically. They do not show genetic characteristics and reproduce by cloning. They show no emotions.. Real ‘believers’ even claim to know where they coming from, viz., - The A-type of the Zeta Reticuli system, the star Bernard, - The longer B-type from Orion and - The C-type from a star from the shoulder of Orion, Bellatrax. The ‘greys’ especially are present since the evidence of the Hills, and after 1977 even more fed by the Spielberg movie ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’. These types are subject of a large number of stamps and sheets e.g. from the former Soviet territories of Komi, Tadjikistan, Tatarstan and Mordovia and also appear on the stamps, mentioned earlier, from Paraguay. It is also interesting that most stories from the Soviet Union originate from these Republics. 2. ‘Humanoïds’, also ‘Nordics’, ‘Blondes’ or ‘Beta-Aliens’. These are also subdivided in three classes. They tend to look like humans and most of the time are friendly. They often are described as real ‘Arier’, the ‘White Giants’ Also the stars in successful TV and movie series often show much similarity to these types. 3. ‘Reptile likes’ or ‘Gamma-Aliens’.

They show similarity to reptiles, are hostile most of the time and consider humanity as a totally inferior race. But reptile-likes are not always hostile considering for instance the movie ‘E.T.’, in which the reptile-like entity is definitely friendly. On the above shown mini-sheets from Nicaragua reptile like creatures are found. Other sources also are bringing up ‘hairy dwarfs’, robots, projections, MIB’s (Men in Black), and ‘Hooded men’. These last category of entities are often connected to near-death experiences and ask questions about life and death.

Now, what can be said about all these stories ? A down-to-earth man quickly will find an explanation in the physical constitution of somebody and I agree that in most of the cases this will be true. As matter of fact we all know that in our dreams the most peculiar events may take place, which awakened we never could have made up At the other end is it rather thrilling to believe in extraterrestrial creatures in one way or another ‘controlling’ our world.. In that way the story of the geophysician Leonid Pritzker, true or not, is very instructive: In the night of 10 to 11 February 1990, before the eyes of others in the neighbourhood, he got covered by a white, milky cloud. He fell asleep for 36 hours, got a high fever and had the feeling if his brain was cut out of his head. After that event his view on the world became totally different. He could obse rve ex t r a - s enso r i a l phenomena and could make photo’s of objects not visible with the naked eye. He also made contact with UFO’s and the entities inside them. This came together with a clear insight in the cosmos, the behaviour of human beings and the development of bio-energy. Mankind should be obliged to deliver as much bio-energy to the Universe as he takes from it. This counts for all organisms on Earth. The energy of the full knowledge has the highest energy level. Of a lower degree is the energy of feelings, and emotions. The lowest energy level is the energy of physical work If the radiation of energy of the full knowledge decreases or stops, this has to be filled up with emotional energy or energy of physical effort. Is that not possible than the bio-energy has to be completed by energy from the inside of the Earth in the form of earth quakes or similar events. That Leonid Pritzker is in the possession of special gifts is evident, but even if his contact with extraterrestrial entities is unverifiable, he sure has a point with respect to his story of the equilibrium in nature.

The sixth and last part of this paper deals with the closely related subject of

Science Fiction, with a conclusion.

40

Astronomy — the 2009 Europa Theme

This year tying in with the 400th anniversary of

Galileo’s first discoveries over 30 countries within the Europa family will take this as their topic with an

issue or one stamp within a wider set carrying the Europa symbol and dealing with an aspect of

Astronomy. Here are some examples of issues so far,

taken from philatelic publications received by your Editor. In issues in 2010 we shall review all the

stamps produced. See http://www.europa-stamps.blogspot.com/

for more detail

Jersey issued

10.02.09

Netherlands to be issued

07.04.09

Greenland issued 19.0109

Sweden issued 29.1.09

Belgium

to be issued 06.04.09

Liechtenstein

issued 02.03.09

Denmark

To be issued

Finland to be issued

06.05.09

Iceland

To be issued 07.05.09

Aland

to be issued 08.05.09