OR Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair...Project Manual FOR Sycamore Elementary School Roof...

262
Project Manual FOR Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair Owner: Vail Unified School District Emc2 Group Project #14219687.00 Date: 01/29/2020 Emc2 GROUP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, PC 1635 North Greenfield Road Suite 144 Mesa, AZ 85205 P 480 830 3838 F 480 830 3860 T 800 372 6849 www.emc2architects.com Learning Places & Growing Spaces

Transcript of OR Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair...Project Manual FOR Sycamore Elementary School Roof...

  • Project Manual FOR

    Sycamore Elementary School

    Roof Repair

    Owner:

    Vail Unified School District

    Emc2 Group Project #14219687.00 Date: 01/29/2020

    Emc2 GROUP ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, PC

    1635 North Greenfield Road

    Suite 144

    Mesa, AZ 85205

    P 480 830 3838

    F 480 830 3860

    T 800 372 6849

    www.emc2architects.com

    Learning Places & Growing Spaces

  • Blank Page

  • Emc2 #14219687.00 Table of Contents Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 01 10-1

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Vail Unified School District Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair

    Vail, Arizona SECTION TITLE

    00 00 05 Cover Sheet 00 01 10 Table of Contents DIVISION 00 – PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS 00 41 00 Bid form 00 63 13 Request for Interpretation Form 00 63 25 Substitution Request (After Bidding Phase) DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 00 00A Abatement with Report 01 11 00 Summary of Work 01 23 00 Alternates 01 26 13 Request for Interpretation 01 29 00 Payment Procedures 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements 01 31 19 Project Meetings 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures 01 42 00 Reference Standards 01 45 00 Quality Control 01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls 01 60 00 Product Requirements 01 73 29 Cutting and Patching 01 77 00 Contract Closeout DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS 02 20 00 Site Preparation 02 41 00 Selective Demolition DIVISION 03 - CONCRETE 03 10 00 Concrete Formwork 03 20 00 Concrete Reinforcing 03 35 10 Polished Concrete Finishing

  • Emc2 #14219687.00 Table of Contents Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 01 10-2

    DIVISION 04 - MASONRY Not Used DIVISION 05 - METALS 05 50 00 Metal Fabrications 05 52 00 Metal Railings

    DIVISION 06 – WOOD, PLASTICS, AND COMPOSITES 06 10 00 Rough Carpentry 06 40 00 Architectural Woodwork 06 61 16 Solid Surface Fabrications DIVISION 07 - THERMAL & MOISTURE PROTECTION 07 21 00 BSD- Thermal Insulation 07 21 19 Thermal Insulation 07 25 00 Weather Resistant Barriers 07 30 00 SFB Roofing General Specifications 07 54 19 Polyvinyl-Chloride (PVC) Roofing 07 60 00 Flashing and Sheet Metal 07 72 00 Roof Accessories 07 92 00 Joint Sealers DIVISION 08 – OPENINGS Not Used DIVISION 09 - FINISHES 09 22 16 Non-Structural Metal Framing 09 29 00 Gypsum Board 09 81 00 Acoustical Insulation 09 91 00 Painting DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES Not Used DIVISION 11 - EQUIPMENT Not Used DIVISION 12 - FURNISHINGS Not Used DIVISION 21 - FIRE SUPPRESSION Not Used DIVISION 22 – PLUMBING Not Used DIVISION 23 – HEATING VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING Not Used DIVISION 26 – ELECTRICAL Not Used

    DIVISION 27 – COMMUNICATIONS (Delta 2) Not Used

  • Emc2 #14219687.00 Table of Contents Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 01 10-3

    DIVISION 28 – ELECTRONIC SAFETY AND SECURITY (Delta 2) Not Used DIVISION 31 – EARTHWORK 31 01 00 Earthwork DIVISION 32 – EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS 32 16 00 Concrete Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks and Driveways

    END OF TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • Emc2 #14219687.00 Table of Contents Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 01 10-4

    Blank Page

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 14219687.00 BID FORM Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 41 00-1

    SECTION 00 41 00

    BID FORM

    SEE IFB PACKAGE FROM ABACUS

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 14219687.00 BID FORM Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 00 41 00-2

    BLANK PAGE

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Form Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair 00 63 13-1

    DOCUMENT 00 63 13

    REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION FORM

    Project: _________________________ R.F.I Number: __________________________

    _________________________ From: _________________________________ To: __________________________ Date: _________________________________

    _________________________ A/E Project Number: ____________________

    Specification Section: Paragraph: Drawing Reference: Detail

    Request: * Requested Date/Time for Response: Signed by:

    Response:

    Attachments

    Response From: To: * Date Rec’d: * Date Ret’d:

    Signed by:

    Copies: Owner Consultants _________ _________ _________ File

    * Contractor shall allow up to 5 working days review and response time for RFI'S, unless review is required of multiple consultants, then the review and response period shall be 7 working days. (See Section 01 26 13.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Form Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair 00 63 13-2

    Blank Page

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Substitution Request (After the Bidding Phase) Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair 00 63 25-1

    SECTION 00 63 25

    SUBSTITUTION REQUEST (After the Bidding Phase)

    kjhkjhkjhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjl;sdfjl;kasjdlgsjafklajsdflkjsadlfjaklsjdfkljasdlkjfsadljfklsfjweoipqurlasdvmklasjdfklasjdfilaj;seijfrkasljfklsdjflkjasldjfl;asdjf;kjasfjsldjfeikjflsdkmvkasljfdklasjdklfjsdkljfklsjdfkljslkdjflakjd;lfj;adlfjklsdjflkjsldkfjlkasjlfsdjlkfsdflsdjlfkjsdkfjasdkfjadjfsdjfjsdfjlsdf;lsakdfjklasdfjksldjflksdjfkljsdlkfjslkdjfklasjdflkjsdlkjflakjalksfdjaklsjdfklshjadflkjasdlfj klaajsdfkajsdkjfk kfjaslkdjfklajskfjaksjdfklj kfljakljf jlkasjal;

    Project: ______________________________ Substitution Request Number: ______________________

    ______________________________ From: ________________________________________

    To: _____________________________ Date: ________________________________________

    ______________________________ A/E Project Number: ______________________________

    Re: ______________________________ Contract For: ____________________________________

    ;asldfjksl;dfjkls;ldjf l;asjdfalskjdfklasjdf lzks;djlkfjsd;lfakj;flkj jlaksjdfklasjdfklajsdflk alksjdfklasjdfklajsdflkj klajsdfkajsdfkjasdfjaskjfdkasljdfklsjdf;lsajdflklsdaf;jf

    Specification Title: ____________________ Description: ____________________________________

    Section: __________ Page: __________ Article/Paragraph: _______________________________ Lkjalksjdflkasjdflkjas;dlfjas;ldk jalksjdflaksjdfklajsdlkfjasklfjasldjf lkajdfklasjdflkjasdfkjasljdfasklj kjsdals;dfjg

    Proposed Substitution: ___________________________________________________________________

    Manufacturer: _________________ Address: _________________________ Phone: ______________

    Trade Name: ____________________________________________________ Model No.: ____________

    Installer: _____________________ Address: _________________________ Phone: ______________

    History: � New product � 2-5 years old � 5-10 years old � More than 10 years old

    Differences between proposed substitution and specified product: _________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    � Point-by point comparative data attached – REQUIRED BY A/E alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

    Reason for not providing specified item: _____________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    Similar Installation:

    Project: _______________________ Architect: ______________________________________

    Address: ______________________ Owner: ________________________________________

    ______________________ Date Installed: __________________________________

    Proposed substitution affects other parts of Work: � No � Yes; explain ______________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________ asdflkjasldjfklashjdflkjasdflkjasldjflka;sjfdl;ksajdfkljsdaflkjasdlfjaslkjdfl;asjdfl;kjasdlkfjasdlkjfakslfjasjdlkfjasklfdjakjdsklfjaskdjfksldjfklajsdlfkj;asldfjlak;sjfdl;kjsdfioa;wejfavmkldsjflakjsdfljaslkjflkasjdlfkjasldjfklasjdflkjasl;djf;lasfdjklasjdfkljsdlkaj;lksdkjfkasdjfkl;aksjdfklaasl;hdjfkljasldfjaklsjdfkjasdlfjalks;jdflkajsdlfjk;lksfjasdkjfa;sdlhfjklajsdljfkakslfjasljd;flasjdlf;lsakjfdklasdfjaklsjdfklajsdljfakljsdlfjaskljdfklasjdlkfjaslkjdf;lasdjfl;asdjflkajsdlkjfsdlkjfksldjflkasjdlfkjasl;dfj;alksjdflk;asjdfl;kajdflkajsdlfjksaldlsksk

    Savings to Owner for accepting substitution: _____________________________ ($_________________).

    Proposed substitution changes Contract Time: � No � Yes [Add] [Deduct] ________________ days. alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

    Supporting Data Attached: � Drawings � Product Data � Samples � Tests � Reports � _____

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Substitution Request (After the Bidding Phase) Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair 00 63 25-2

    alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;dj

    The Undersigned certifies:

    • Proposed substitution has been fully investigated and determined to be equal or superior in all respects to specified product.

    • Same warranty will be furnished for proposed substitution as for specified product. • Same maintenance service and source of replacement parts, as applicable, is available. • Proposed substitution will have no adverse effect on other trades and will not affect or delay

    progress schedule. • Cost data as stated above is complete. Claims for additional costs related to accepted substitution

    which may subsequently become apparent are to be waived. • Proposed substitution does not affect dimensions and functional clearances. • Payment will be made for changes to building design, including A/E design, detailing, and

    construction costs by the substitution. • Coordination, installation, and changes in the Work as necessary for accepted substitution will be

    complete in all respects. alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

    Submitted by: ________________________________________________________________________

    Signed by: ________________________________________________________________________

    Firm: ________________________________________________________________________

    Address: ________________________________________________________________________

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Telephone: ________________________________________________________________________

    Attachments: ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    _____________________________________________________________________________________ alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

    A/E’s REVIEW AND ACTION � Substitution approved – Make submittals in accordance with Specification Section 01 33 00. � Substitution approved as noted – Make submittals in accordance with Specification Section

    01 33 00. � Substitution rejected – Use specified materials. � Substitution Request received too late – Use specified materials. Signed by: _______________________________________________ Date: ______________________ alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

    Additional Comments: � Contractor � Subcontractor � Supplier � Manufacturer � A/E � _______ ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________________ alskjdflk;asjdflkjasdljakf ;lkasjdlf;kjasdljfalksjdfklajsdflkjasdlfjalskfj a;lskjdflaksjdflkajsdfljk jasjfas;djf

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 ABATEMENT Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair 01 00 00A

    SECTION 01 00 00A

    ABATEMENT

    CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE TO ABATE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISTURBED

    BY THE PROJECT WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH HCM REPORT

    INCLUDED AS PART OF BID DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING ALL

    CERTIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS/ REPORTS.

    SEE ATTACHED REPORT

    END OF SECTION

  • Limited NESHAP Asbestos Inspection Report

    Sent Via: Email – [email protected]

    Mr. Jerry Woods

    Vail Unified School District

    13801 E. Benson Highway

    Vail, AZ 85641

    RE: Sycamore Elementary

    16701 S. Houghton Rd.

    Vail, AZ 85641

    SFB #1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008

    Dear Mr. Fields

    At the request of the client, bulk sampling was performed at the above referenced project to determine the presence, if

    any, of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) in the materials / areas specified. Please see the sampling results and final

    project documentation for the above referenced site.

    Inspector Information

    Mr. Bryan Hill inspected the site listed above for asbestos per our scope of work on April 22, 2019. Mr. Hill is a certified

    AHERA Initial Building Inspector.

    Scope of Work

    The sampling, testing and preceding material analysis was conducted pursuant to a signed proposal with scope of work

    that includes the identification of suspect materials for planned re-roofing and or renovation.

    WRECORP’s General Policy

    It is the general operating policy of WRECORP to recommend removal / abatement of all ACM prior to any disturbance.

    Trained and licensed asbestos abatement professional must always perform removal activities pursuant to applicable

    regulations. We recommend that only experienced, state approved abatement contractors be utilized for abatement

    activities.

  • Sample

    ID

    Homogeneous

    Material

    Location NESHAP

    Category

    Positive or

    Negative

    Amount

    R1-R7 Roofing roll, roof ply/bitumen 3,8,1,6,3,4 Yes Negative None

    M1-M5 Mastic / Caulk 5,7,1,4,3 Yes Positive 330 sqft

    C1-C5 Coating / Caulk 3,6,4,7,9 N/A Negative None

    FWS1-FWS4 Flashing Wall Sealant / Caulk 5,1,6 Yes Negative None

    A1-A5 Aluminum Paint / Coatings 2,1,7,5,4 Yes Positive 420 sqft

    CS1-CS2 Coping Sealant / Caulk 6 No Negative None

    Laboratory Analysis Summary

    During our site investigation of the property, a total of 27 bulk samples were collected and analyzed for asbestos

    content. The samplers were analyzed by Fiberquant Analytical Services (5025 S. 33rd St, Phoenix, AZ 85040 by Polarized

    Light Microscopy (PLM) EPA, Methods 600/R-93/116. The National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)

    administers Fiberquants laboratory proficiency. Fiberquants NVLAP code is 101031-0.

    Inspection / Sampling Methods

    A visual inspection and sampling survey in the designated areas(s) of the facility were conducted in accordance with

    general Environmental Protection Agency / Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (EPA/AHERA) and current OSHA

    29 CFR 1926.1101 guidelines to determine the presence of exposed and or accessible suspect asbestos containing

    materials (ACM). Suspect materials were determined to be either friable / non-friable by touch as per EPA NESHAP 40

    CFR 61, Subpart M. Bulk material samples were collected from a random manner that is representative of the

    homogeneous area. Non-friable material samples were also collected randomly. A certified building inspector

    conducted the sampling of the site listed above in accordance to applicable regulations.

  • NESHAP’s Notification Information

    AHERA Inspector: Bryan Hill AHERA Number: G9488

    Expiration Date: 2/1/20

    Training Provider: The Asbestos Institute

    Date of Inspection April 22, 2019 Amount of RACM 750 SqFt

    NESHAPS’s Notification

    Required for ACM

    Yes Amount of Category

    I:

    None

    Amount of Category

    II:

    None

    Name of Laboratory: Fiberquant Analytical Services Method of Analysis: M600/R-93/116

    Number of samples: 27 Date Analyzed: April 26,2019

    Maricopa County Air Quality Department Regulations

    The Maricopa County Air Quality Department regulates all asbestos renovation and demolition with Maricopa County.

    Should areas within the site listed above become scheduled for demolition activities involve removing regulated (friable)

    amounts of asbestos are to be abated from the site equal or greater than 160 square feet, 260 linear feet, or 35 cubic

    feet, you must prepare and submit the 10-Day NESHAP notification form with the notification fee and mailed or hand

    delivered to Maricopa County Planning & Development One Stop Shop, 501 N 44th St., 2nd Floor, Phoenix, Arizona, 85008

    ten working days prior to the commencement of the demolition activity.

    Notification forms can be downloaded from https://webcms.pima.gov

    Classifications

    Asbestos Containing Materials: Any material containing more than one (1%) asbestos as determined by bulk

    sampling by and EPA certified inspector with sample analysis being completed by a NVLAP accredited laboratory.

    EPA NESHAP Classifications:

    o Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM – Friable)

    o Category I Non-friable materials (Cat. I)

    o Category II Non-friable materials (Cat. II)

    OSHA Classifications:

    o Class 1: Surfacing Materials, Thermal Systems Insulation

    o Class 2: All other materials not included in class 1.

    o Class 3: Maintenance activities that disturb ACM

    o Class 4: Maintenance activities that come into contact with, but does not disturb ACM.

  • Definitions

    Functional Space: A room, group of rooms, or homogeneous area, such as crawl spaces, bedroom, a kitchen,

    gymnasium, hallways, etc.; designated by a person accredited to prepare management plans, designing

    abatement projects or conduct response actions.

    Homogeneous Area: An area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous

    material that is uniform in color and texture.

    Miscellaneous Materials: Interior building material on structural components, structure members or fixtures,

    such as floor tile and ceiling tiles, and does not include surfacing materials or TSI.

    Non-Friable: Non-friable means material in a building which when dry may not be crumbled, pulverized, or

    reduced to power by hand pressure.

    Surfacing Materials: Material that is sprayed, trawled on, or otherwise applied to surfaces.

    Thermal System Insulation: ACM applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breaching, tanks, ducts, or other structural

    components to prevent heat loss or gain.

  • 1

    2

    3

    45

    6

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    Vail Unified School DistrictSycamore Elementary School16701 S Houghton RdVail, AZ 85641

    N

    7

    8 9

    79,270 SqFt

    Building is not part of schools Inventory

    1 2 3

    4 5 6

    7

    8

    9

    # Bulk Sampling Grid

    Sampling Type and number#

  • Client Job: Sycamore Elementary School PO Number: S-4-22-19-2

    JobNumber: 201903838

    Routing Number: -

    # Samples: 27

    PLMn

    PLM The "New" Method; see below

    Client:

    Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) Analysis for Asbestos in Bulk Sample

    Method and Analysis Information:

    Each bulk sample is first dissected under a 7-30x magnification stereo-microscope. This examination is used to determine the general type of

    sample, how many and what type of layers it has, and initial estimates of fiber types and quantities. Second, liquid media mounts are made of each

    layer - such mounts may be of selected fibers (used solely for identification purposes) or may be representative of the layer as a whole (used for

    quantitation purposes). The mounts may be made in a synthetic Canadian balsam, one of several solvents, or in refractive index oils (media of known refractive index). Generally, a variety of different mounts are made: some optimized for fiber visibility, some optimized for fiber identification, and

    some optimized for fiber quantitation. The mounted slides are then examined at 50-400x magnification on a Nikon Labphot-pol microscope. Optical

    characteristics are used to identify each observed fiber type; the optical data are contained for each sample on its detail analysis sheet, attached.

    Current EPA and NESHAP regulations designate a result of 1 % asbestos as "positive". Samples containing

    layers that have been determined to be "positive" may have to be handled differently during a renovation or demolition than samples whose layers

    have been determined to be "negative."

    The method of fiber identification and quantitation is the “Standard Operating Procedures for the Analysis of Asbestos in Bulk Samples using

    Polarized Light Microscopy”, Chapter 7 of the Quality Assurance and Management Manual. This SOP and its associated reporting have been designed

    to satisfy all requirements in both EPA Method 600/M4-82-020 (The Interim Method) and EPA Method 600/R-93/116 (The New Method). The Interim Method is the required method for AHERA (US EPA 40 CFR Pt. 763), but this method calls for the reporting of composited results of multi-layered

    samples that is no longer an acceptable reporting practice in most circumstances. Current EPA rules, such as NESHAP (US EPA 40 CFR Pt. 61), as well

    as NVLAP accreditation policies, call for separate reporting for each layer of multi-layered samples. The New Method contains the same procedures for

    identification and quantification of asbestos as does the Interim Method, except that multi-layered samples are reported to comply with the latest US EPA rule. Fiberquant not only reports the asbestos content of each layer of multi-layered samples separately (satisfying current EPA and NVLAP

    reporting requirements), but Fiberquant also reports what percentage of the sample each layer comprises. Therefore, the results may be

    arithmetically composited to satisfy the reporting requirements of the Interim Method. The method of fiber quantitation is an estimation technique in

    which the analysts quantitation is routinely calibrated by reference quantitation standards, and which has been shown to be equivalent in precision and accuracy to point counting. Friability is estimated for the purposes of deciding when to point count. Friabilities determined in the field take

    precedence over those determined in the laboratory. Those sample layers which are friable and estimated by the analyst to contain

  • PLM Analysis Summary: Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    analysts can identify asbestos and asbestos-look-alike fibers. Quantitative reference samples are routinely analyzed to calibrate and characterize the

    estimation procedure. Microscope alignment is checked each day. Refractive index oils are calibrated at least quarterly. At least 10% of client

    samples are re-analyzed from scratch by a different analyst than the original, and any discrepancies are resolved for the sample and similar sample types before the results are reported. All quality checks performed for these samples were in control except as detailed in the "Analytical Notes"

    below. All analysts participate in interlab round robins and proficiency testing to assure competence. Fiberquant is accredited by NVLAP (Lab code

    #101031) for the analysis of bulk samples for asbestos using PLM. Accreditation does not imply endorsement by the EPA, any other United States governmental agency or any private agency or association. Each lab analysis refers only to the sample tested, and may not, due to the sampling

    process, be representative of the material sampled. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the approval of Fiberquant Analytical

    Services.

    Job Analysis Notes:

    Some results may have been calculated using client supplied data, such as volume or area sampled, for which Fiberquant assumes no liability for accuracy.

    Sample Number Lab Number Apparent Sample Type * Positive Layer Yes or No

    Layer Color Apparent Layer Type * Asbestos Results

    Roofing2019-03838- 1S-R1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 2S-R2-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    Roofing2019-03838- 3S-R3-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    Roofing2019-03838- 4S-R4-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsurfacewhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 4

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 5

    Roofing2019-03838- 5S-R5-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    Roofing2019-03838- 6S-R6-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 4

    Roofing2019-03838- 7S-R7-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 3

    no asbestos detectedroof ply/bitumenblackLayer # 4

    Roofing2019-03838- 8S-M1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 1

    Roofing2019-03838- 9S-M2-4-22-19 Positive Layer? YesSample # 5-10% chrysotile asbestoscaulkblackLayer # 1

    Roofing2019-03838- 10S-M3-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 1

    Roofing2019-03838- 11S-M4-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsurfacewhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 12S-M5-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedfabricwhiteLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 13S-C1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 14S-C2-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 15S-C3-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 2

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 2 of 14

  • Roofing2019-03838- 16S-C4-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedcaulkblackLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 17S-C5-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedcoatingwhiteLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedroofing roll/shingleblackLayer # 2

    Adhesive/caulk2019-03838- 18S-FWS1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealantclearLayer # 1

    Adhesive/caulk2019-03838- 19S-FWS2-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealanttanLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedsealantwhiteLayer # 2

    no asbestos detectedpainttanLayer # 3

    Adhesive/caulk2019-03838- 20S-FWS3-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealantoff-whiteLayer # 1

    Adhesive/caulk2019-03838- 21S-CS1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealantclearLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedpaintpurpleLayer # 2

    Adhesive/caulk2019-03838- 22S-CS2-4-22-19 Positive Layer? NoSample # no asbestos detectedsealantclearLayer # 1

    no asbestos detectedpaintpurpleLayer # 2

    Roofing2019-03838- 23S-A1-4-22-19 Positive Layer? YesSample #

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 1S-R1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 50 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 50 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 2S-R2-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 34 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 33 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    3 33 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 4 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 3S-R3-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 34 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 33 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    3 33 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 4S-R4-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    5# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 3 n.d. - - - - -surface white 1

    2 25 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    3 24 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    4 24 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    5 24 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 5 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 5S-R5-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 33 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 34 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    3 33 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 6S-R6-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    4# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 30 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 25 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    3 25 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    4 20 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 6 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 7S-R7-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    4# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 30 5-10% - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    2 25 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    3 25 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    4 20 10-20% - - - - -roof ply/bitumen black 1

    100Total % 10-20% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 8S-M1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    Yes

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    1# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    cellulose fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    cellulose fiber W F N N H + U

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 100 5-10% - - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 9S-M2-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    Yes

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    1# Layers YesPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    chrysotile asbestos cellulose fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos

    cellulose fiber

    1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P

    W F N N H + U

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 100 5-10%

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 10S-M3-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    1# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    cellulose fiber glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    cellulose fiber

    glass fiber

    W F N N H + U

    CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 100 5-10% 2-5% - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total % 5-10% 2-5% - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 11S-M4-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    synthetic fiber (shr cellulose fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    synthetic fiber (shredded)

    cellulose fiber

    W A N N H + P

    W F N N H + U

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, binder

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 25 2-5% n.d. - - - -surface white 1

    2 75 n.d. 5-10% - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total %

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 13S-C1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. Note: Only the surface of the shingle was present.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 95 n.d. - - - - -coating white 1

    2 5 n.d. - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 14S-C2-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    glass fiber CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 85 n.d. - - - - -coating white 1

    2 15 2-5% - - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total % 1-2% - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 9 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 16S-C4-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    synthetic fiber (shrFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    synthetic fiber (shredded) W A N N H + P

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 85 2-5% - - - - -coating white 1

    2 15 n.d. - - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total % 2-5% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 17S-C5-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Non-fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    synthetic fiber (extrFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. Note: Only the surface of the shingle was present.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    synthetic fiber (extruded) W E N N H + P

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, rock

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 90 30-40% - - - - -coating white 1

    2 10 n.d. - - - - -roofing roll/shingle black 1

    100Total % 30-40% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 18S-FWS1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Adhesive/caulk

    Yes

    RubberyOKAn?

    1# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 100 n.d. - - - - -sealant clear 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 10 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 19S-FWS2-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Adhesive/caulk

    No

    RubberyOKAn?

    3# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, binder

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 30 n.d. - - - - -sealant tan 1

    2 65 n.d. - - - - -sealant white 1

    3 5 n.d. - - - - -paint tan 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 20S-FWS3-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Adhesive/caulk

    Yes

    RubberyOKAn?

    1# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, polymer,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 100 n.d. - - - - -sealant off-white 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 21S-CS1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Adhesive/caulk

    No

    RubberyOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, binder

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 95 n.d. - - - - -sealant clear 1

    2 5 n.d. - - - - -paint purple 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 11 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 22S-CS2-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Adhesive/caulk

    No

    RubberyOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    noneFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    none

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): polymer, filler, binder

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 90 n.d. - - - - -sealant clear 1

    2 10 n.d. - - - - -paint purple 1

    100Total % n.d. - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 23S-A1-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers YesPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    chrysotile asbestos glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos

    glass fiber

    1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P

    CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen, binder

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 25

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 25S-A3-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    2# Layers NoPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    cellulose fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent. Note: Silver paint was too thin for an accurate analysis..

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    cellulose fiber W F N N H + U

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 2 n.d. - - - - -paint silver 1

    2 98 5-10% - - - - -caulk black 1

    100Total % 5-10% - - - - -Overall %

    2019-03838- 26S-A4-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers YesPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    chrysotile asbestos glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos

    glass fiber

    1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P

    CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 15 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint silver 1

    2 80 5-10% n.d. - - - -caulk black 1

    3 5 n.d. 80-90% - - - -fabric white 1

    100Total % 2-5% 2-5% - - - -Overall %

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 13 of 14

  • PLM Analysis Details Job Number: 201903838 Sycamore Elementary School

    2019-03838- 27S-A5-4-22-19 4/22/2019Lab Number Sample Sampled:

    RAMAnalyzed By 4/26/2019

    Homogeneous

    Roofing

    No

    Fibrous SolidOKAn?

    3# Layers YesPos Layer?

    Apparent Smp Type

    chrysotile asbestos glass fiberFiber Identification:

    Sample Analytical Note

    Procedure: tweased apart using forceps. Procedure: dissolution of matrix using solvent.

    Fibers

    1

    Color Mrph Iso Pleo Bi Elg Ext Oil Col Par Col Per RI Par RI Per

    Refractive Index Determinations

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    1.561 1.553chrysotile asbestos

    glass fiber

    1.550 db/ly sb/oW A N N L + P

    CL D Y

    Non-Fibrous Components (in approx. decreasing order): filler, bitumen,

    Condition: acceptable

    Layers

    # Layer Type % Color Friability

    Percents of Each Fiber

    Fib 1 Fib 2 Fib 3 Fib 4 Fib 5 Fib 6

    1 10 n.d. n.d. - - - -paint silver 1

    2 85 5-10% n.d. - - - -caulk black 1

    3 5 n.d. 80-90% - - - -fabric white 1

    100Total % 5-10% 2-5% - - - -Overall %

    Fr=Friability: 1=very non-friable; 2= non-friable; 3=friable; 4=highly friableColors: B=black;BL=blue;BR=brown;CL=clear;G=Green;GY=gray;OR=orange;OW=off-white;PN=pink;PU=purple;R=red;TN=tan;W=white;Y=yellow;V=variousFiber Morphology: A=fine fibers/bundles, white, sinewy, flexible; B=fine fibers/bundles, w-br, straight, broomed ends; C=fine fibers/bundles, blue, straight, broomed ends; D=fine to coarse fibers, CL-B, brittle; E=coarse fibers,CL or dyed, striated; F=coarse fibers or splinters, W-BR, ribbon-like; G=lath-like or shards, low aspect ratio, may taperIso=isotropism - may be yes or no; Pleo=pleochroism - may be yes or no; Bi=birefringence - may be None, Low, Medium or HighElg=sign of elongation - may be +, - or B (both); Ext=extinction - may be Parallel, Oblique, None or Undulating; Oil=medium used to for dispersion stainingCol Par=dispersion staining colors parallel to the fiber (fiber/halo): b/w=black/white; dg/py=dark gray/pale yellow; vg/y=violet gray/yellow; db/ly=dark blue/lemon yellow; vb/g= vivid blue/gold; sb/o=sky blue/orange; pb/r=pale blue/red; gb/dr=gray blue/dark red; w/b=white/black. Col Perp=same only perpendicular to fiber.RI Par=refractive index parallel to fiber; RI Perp=refractive index perpendicular to fiber

    26-Apr-19Analyst: ROBERT A. McCORMICK

    Larry S. Pierce, Approved Accreditation Signatory

    Printed:

    26-Apr-19Original Print Date:

    5025 S. 33rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85040-2816 Phone: 602-276-6139 1-800-743-2687 FAX: 602-276-4558

    Fiberquant, Inc. Page 14 of 14

  • Conclusions

    There is no guarantee that all asbestos containing building materials have been located and properly identified in the

    sampling area. The possibility does exist that the material composition of the samples collected may differ depending

    upon the location from which the samples were taken. This is true in some cases, for samples collected from the sample

    area (i.e. patch materials).

    Should any previously unidentified materials, materials inaccessible at the time of our inspection, or material requiring

    additional sampling become exposed as a result of construction, demolition/renovation, or remodeling, those materials,

    if any, must be sampled and tested for asbestos by an AHERA accredited building inspector prior to disturbance.

    If renovation or demolition will affect the asbestos containing materials(s) found in this report, removal is recommended

    prior to these actions. Asbestos abatement should only be performed by trained, certified personnel or a licensed,

    insured asbestos abatement contractor.

    WRECORP appreciates the opportunity to have provided these services to you. If there any questions and or concerns

    pertaining to this report, please contact me at your convenience.

    Sincerely,

    Bryan Hill

    AHERA Building Inspector 9488

    Expires February 1, 2020

    Attachment 1: Inspector Certification

    Attachment 2: Laboratory Accreditation and Certification

    Attachment 3: Site Map

    Attachment 4: Photo Documentation

  • Attachment 1:

    Inspector Certification

  • Attachment 2:

    Laboratory Accreditation and Certifications

  • Attachment 3:

    Site Map

  • 1

    2

    3

    45

    6

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    Vail Unified School DistrictSycamore Elementary School16701 S Houghton RdVail, AZ 85641

    N

    7

    8 9

    79,270 SqFt

    Building is not part of schools Inventory

  • Attachment 4:

    Photo Documentation

  • 6829 W. Corrine Drive – Peoria, AZ 85381

    Phone: (623)878-7117 / Fax: (800)861-3792

    Email: [email protected] / Website: www.wrecorp.com

    Sycamore Elementary School Bulk Sampling Photo Documentation Report

    Item No.

    Photo Description

    1

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Roofing (R1-R7)

    2

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Mastic (M1-M5)

    3

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Coating (C1-C5)

  • 6829 W. Corrine Drive – Peoria, AZ 85381

    Phone: (623)878-7117 / Fax: (800)861-3792

    Email: [email protected] / Website: www.wrecorp.com

    4

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Flashing Wall Sealant (FWS1-FWS4)

    5

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Aluminum Paint (A1-A5)

    6

    Typical condition of sample of homogeneous area taken. Samples Coping Sealant (CS1-CS2)

    Limitations on Consultant’s Responsibility, Indemnity & Insurance Client acknowledges that Consultant is performing professional service on behalf of Client and in the event claims, losses, damages or expenses are caused by the negligence of Consultant or Client or both, Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, and Consultant’s officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against liability for all Professional Liability claims, losses, damages and expenses whether or not insured, including reasonable attorney’s fees.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Summary of Work Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 11 00-1

    SECTION 01 11 00

    SUMMARY OF WORK

    1.01 WORK COVERED BY CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

    A. Project: Vail Sycamore Elementary Roof Repair Project

    B. Base Bid: The bid shall include labor, material, equipment, services and transportation necessary for the construction of the Project.

    1.02 DEFINITIONS PERTAINING TO THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

    A. Furnish: To purchase and deliver. B. Install: To place into final position and connect. C. Provide: To furnish and install. D. Connect: To make the complete necessary utility connections from the building utility to the equipment/fixture, etc. as required for that item to function as intended. E. "As shown", "as detailed", "as indicated" or words of similar import mean as indicated on

    the drawings F. "As selected", "as approved" or words of similar import mean as selected by, as

    approved by, or as accepted by the Architect and Owner. G. "Approved equal", "or equal" shall mean as approved and accepted by the Architect and

    Owner. H. "Shall" means mandatory. I. "As required" means as required by the contract documents. J. "As necessary" means essential to the completion of the work. K. "Concealed" means not visible in the finished work. L. "Exposed" means visible in the finished work. M. "Days" means calendar days. N. Substantial Completion: That stage in the progress of the Work when the Work or

    designated portion thereof is sufficiently complete in accordance with the Contract Documents so that the Owner can occupy or utilize the Work for its intended use.

    1.04 OWNER FURNISHED PRODUCTS

    A. Products furnished to the site and paid for by Owner: 1. As required and to be determined at O.A.C.meeting.

    B. Owner's Responsibilities: 1. Arrange for and deliver Owner reviewed Shop Drawings, Product Data, and

    Samples, to Contractor.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Summary of Work Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 11 00-2

    2. Arrange and pay for product delivery to site. 3. On delivery, inspect products jointly with Contractor. 4. Submit claims for transportation damage and replace damaged, defective, or

    deficient items. 5. Arrange for Manufacturers' warranties, inspections and service.

    C. Contractor's Responsibilities:

    1. Contractor shall give Owner written notice stating dates when Owner-furnished items must be received at the job site to insure Project completion in accordance with established schedule.

    2. Review Owner-reviewed Shop Drawings, Product data, and Samples 3. Receive and unload products at site; inspect for completeness or damage, jointly

    with Owner. 4. Handle, store, assemble, install, connect and finish such products, including

    furnishing lubricants and fluids and procedures required to render product serviceable and operative.

    5. Contractor is responsible for the coordination and interface of Owner-Furnished and Installed work with Work of this Contract to provide all required mechanical and electrical rough-ins, openings, supports, dimensions, etc., as required for a complete installation

    1.05 CONTRACTOR USE OF SITE

    A. General: Contractor shall have full use of the site within Contract Limit Lines indicated for construction operations during the construction period.

    B. Use of site shall allow for:

    1. Owner occupancy. 2. Work by Other Contractors and Work by Owner. 3. Use of site by public.

    C. Owner Operations:

    1. At no time during the work shall Contractor place, or cause to be placed, materials or equipment, or other items, at a location which would impede or impair access to or from the present facilities for customers, employees or delivery personnel.

    2. Contractor shall cooperate with the Owner in providing traffic control during course of construction in order to minimize inconvenience to Owner's customers.

    D. Emergency Building Exits During Construction: As indicated on drawings. Provide

    protection of emergency exits located at all entrances during the entire course of construction.

    E. Construction Operations: Limited to areas noted on Drawings, including storage of

    materials and equipment. F. Time Restrictions for Performing Exterior Work: TBD G. Utility Outages and Shutdown: Interruption of utility services to the existing building(s) is

    not permitted.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Summary of Work Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 11 00-3

    1.08 OWNER OCCUPANCY

    A. The Owner will occupy the site during entire period of construction. B. Cooperate with Owner to minimize conflict, and to facilitate Owner's operations. C. Schedule the Work to accommodate this requirement.

    1.09 PERMITS, FEES AND NOTICES

    A. Plan check fees have been paid by the Owner.

    B. The Contractor shall secure and pay for the building permit and for other permits and governmental fees, licenses and inspections necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work which are customarily secured after execution of the Contract and which are legally required at the time the bids are received or negotiations concluded. This shall include, but not be limited to: 1. Building Permit from responsible jurisdiction. 2. Inspections and Certificates from State Fire Marshal and County Health

    Department. C. The Contractor shall comply with and give notices required by laws, ordinances, rules,

    regulations and lawful orders of public authority bearing on the performance of the Work. D. It is not the responsibility of the Contractor to make certain that the Contract Documents

    are in accordance with applicable laws, statutes, building codes and regulations. If the Contractor observes that any of the Contract Documents are at variance therewith in any respect, he shall promptly notify the Architect and Owner in writing, and any necessary changes shall be accomplished by appropriate Modification.

    E. If the Contractor performs Work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, ordinances, rules

    and regulations, and without such notice to the Architect and Owner, the Contractor shall assume full responsibility therefor and shall bear attributable costs. Work shall comply with the following: 1. Codes, Ordinances, Rules and Regulations as adopted by City of Ajo.

    1.10 SPECIAL SITE CONDITIONS

    A. The Contractor shall be completely responsible for protecting the existing building from

    damage and/or injury due to this Work and shall repair at his expense and to the Architect's satisfaction, all areas damaged as a result of his Work.

    1.11 APPROVED APPLICATORS

    A. Where specific instructions in the Specifications require that a particular product and/or material be applied and/or installed by an "approved applicator" it shall be the Contractor's responsibility to insure that any Subcontractor or Subcontractor used for such Work is in fact currently certified by the particular Manufacturer for this type of installation or application.

    1.12 APPROVED MANUFACTURERS

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Summary of Work Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 11 00-4

    A. Each Section includes a list of Manufacturers whose equipment is acceptable as to manufacture, subject to conformance with the Contract Documents. Careful checking must be made by the Contractor and the manufacturer or equipment supplier to verify that the equipment will meet all capacities, requirements, space allocations and is suitable to the intended purpose.

    1.13 REFERENCE DATA

    A. Reference data made available to the Contractor is for the Contractor's information only,

    and neither the Owner nor the Architect assume any responsibility for the Contractor's conclusions.

    B. The Contractor shall establish and maintain all buildings and construction grades, lines,

    levels, and bench marks. This Work shall be performed by a licensed Civil Engineer or Surveyor under the employ of the Contractor, who shall certify to the Architect that he has performed this service.

    C. The Contractor shall not remove any property line markers or monuments or data

    established by the Owner. 1.14 ARCHITECTURAL BARRIERS

    A. It is the desire of the Owner that the facilities and improvements constructed under this Contract meet or exceed the intent of applicable public law concerning prohibition of discrimination, and that no individual be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of this completed Project.

    B. The designers and drafters of these Documents have intended to incorporate those

    Owner's intentions into these Documents. C. It is recognized that there may be products not incorporated into these Documents that

    may more nearly meet the Owner's desires than those included. D. The Owner hereby solicits those providing elements of this Project to bid and contract for

    the Project as required by these Documents, but at the time of submitting Shop Drawings, or sooner when appropriate, and without causing delay in the Project, to also submit proposals for improving the accessibility of the Project to physically or mentally impaired persons.

    1.15 REPRODUCTION OF DRAWINGS

    A. Contractor shall not alter the size of Drawings when making or ordering reproductions. B. Only full-size current drawings shall be maintained at the Project Site.

    1.16 COMMUNICATIONS

    A. All communications with the Architect shall be copied to the Owner's Representative. B. All communications with the Architect's consultants shall be through the Architect.

    END OF SECTION

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 ALTERNATES Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 23 00-1

    SECTION 01 23 00

    ALTERNATES 1.01 ALTERNATE BIDS

    A. Alternates quoted on Bid Forms will be reviewed and accepted or rejected at the Owner's option. Accepted Alternates will be identified in Owner-Contractor Agreement.

    B. Coordinate related work and modify surrounding work as required.

    END OF SECTION

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 ALTERNATES Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 23 00-2

    Blank Page

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 26 13-1

    SECTION 01 26 13

    REQUESTS FOR INTERPRETATION

    PART 1 GENERAL

    1.01 SUMMARY

    A. Section Includes: Administrative requirements for requests for information / interpretation.

    1.02 DEFINITIONS

    A. Request For Information / Interpretation (RFI): 1. A document submitted by the Contractor requesting clarification of a portion of

    the Contract Documents, hereinafter referred to as RFI. 2. A properly prepared request for information / interpretation shall include a

    detailed written statement that indicates the specific Drawings or Specification in need of clarification and the nature of the clarification requested. a. Drawings shall be identified by drawing number and location on the

    drawing sheet. b. Specifications shall be identified by Section number, page and

    paragraph. 3. Requests for Information: Request made by Contractor concerning items not

    indicated on drawings or contained in Project Manual that is required to properly perform the work.

    4. Requests for Interpretation: Request made by Contractor in accordance with Owner’s Representative’s third party obligations to the contract for construction.

    B. Improper RFI's:

    1. RFI's that are not properly prepared. 2. Improper RFI's will be processed by the Architect at the Architect's standard

    hourly rate and Architect will charge the Owner, and such costs will be deducted from monies still due the Contractor. The Contractor will be notified by the Architect prior to the processing of improper RFI's.

    C. Frivolous RFI's:

    1. RFI's that request information that is clearly shown on the Contract Documents. 2. Frivolous RFI's may be returned unanswered or may be processed by the

    Architect at the Architect's standard hourly rate and Architect will charge the Owner, and such costs will be deducted from monies still due the Contractor. The Contractor will be notified by the Architect prior to the processing of frivolous RFI's.

    1.03 CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION

    A. RFI's shall be submitted on Document 00 63 13 included in the Project Manual.

    1. Forms shall be completely filled in, and if prepared by hand, shall be fully legible after photocopying or transmission by facsimile (fax).

    2. RFI’s shall be submitted in numerical order with no breaks in the consecutive numbering.

    3. Each page of attachments to RFI's shall bear the RFI number and shall be consecutively numbered in chronological order.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 26 13-2

    4. RFI's may be submitted by E-Mail. a. Submittal by E-Mail is the preferred method of submittal. b. Address for E-Mail will be distributed by the Architect at the Pre-

    Construction Conference. c. An electronic version of Document 00 63 13 will be provided upon

    request. B. When the Contractor is unable to determine from the Contract Documents, the material,

    process or system to be installed, the Architect shall be requested to make a clarification of the indeterminate item. 1. Wherever possible, such clarification shall be requested at the next appropriate

    project meeting, with the response entered into the meeting minutes. When clarification at the meeting is not possible, either because of the urgency of the need, or the complexity of the item, Contractor shall prepare and submit an RFI to the Architect.

    2. RFI requesting clarification of an item required of a document known to have been prepared by a consultant to the Architect, may be sent directly to the consultant with a copy to the Architect, if this direct communication is approved by the Architect.

    C. Contractor shall endeavor to keep the number of RFI's to a minimum. In the event that

    the process becomes unwieldy, in the opinion of the Architect, because of the number and frequency of RFI's submitted, the Architect may require the Contractor to abandon the process and submit future requests as either submittals, substitutions or requests for change.

    D. RFI's shall be originated by the Contractor.

    1. RFI's from subcontractors or material suppliers shall be submitted through, reviewed by, and signed by the Contractor prior to submittal to the Architect.

    2. RFI's from subcontractors or material suppliers sent directly to the Owner’s Representative, Architect or the Architect's consultants shall not be accepted and will be returned unanswered.

    E. Contractor shall carefully study the Contract Documents to assure that the requested

    information is not available therein. RFI's which request information available in the Contract Documents will be deemed either "improper" or "frivolous" as noted above.

    F. In cases where RFI's are issued to request clarification of coordination issues, for

    example, pipe and duct routing, clearances, specific locations of work shown diagrammatically, and similar items, the Contractor shall fully lay out a suggested solution using drawings or sketches drawn to scale, and submit same with the RFI. RFI's which fail to include a suggested solution will be returned unanswered with a requirement that the Contractor submit a complete request.

    G. RFI's shall not be used for the following purposes:

    1. To request approval of submittals 2. To request approval of substitutions, 3. To request changes which are known to entail additional cost or credit. (A

    Change Order Request form shall be used.) 4. To request different methods of performing work than those drawn and specified.

    H. In the event the Contractor believes that a clarification by the Architect results in

    additional cost or time, Contractor shall not proceed with the work indicated by the RFI until a Change Order (or Construction Change Directive, if applicable to project) is prepared and approved. RFI's shall not automatically justify a cost increase in the work or a change in the project schedule.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 26 13-3

    1. Answered RFI's shall not be construed as approval to perform extra work. 2. Unanswered RFI's will be returned with a stamp or notation: Not Reviewed.

    I. Contractor shall prepare and maintain a log of RFI'S, and at any time requested by the

    Architect, Contractor shall furnish copies of the log showing outstanding RFI'S. Contractor shall note unanswered RFI's in the log.

    J. Contractor shall allow up to 5 working days review and response time for RFI'S, unless

    review is required of multiple consultants, then the review and response period shall be 7 working days. 1. The Architect will endeavor to respond in a timely fashion to RFI's. 2. RFI shall state requested date/time for response, however, this requested

    date/time for response is not a guarantee that the RFI will be answered by that date/time if that date/time is too expeditious

    1.04 ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE TO RFI'S

    A. Architect will respond to RFI's on one of the following forms: 1. Properly prepared RFI's:

    a. Response directly upon Request for Information / Interpretation form. Architect's Supplemental Instruction.

    b. Request for Proposal. 2. Improper or Frivolous RFI's

    a. Notification of Processing Fee(s). b. Unanswered RFI's will be returned with a stamp or notation: Not

    Reviewed.. 3. Answers to properly prepared RFI's may or may not be made directly upon the

    RFI form as deemed appropriate by the Architect.

    B. Architect may opt to retain RFI's for discussion during regularly scheduled project meetings for inclusion of responses in meeting minutes in lieu of responding on a written form.

    PART 2 PRODUCTS

    Not applicable. PART 3 EXECUTION

    Not applicable.

    END OF SECTION

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 Request for Interpretation Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 26 13-4

    Blank Page

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC Emc2 Project No. 14219687.00

    Payment Procedures 01 29 00-1

    SECTION 01 29 00

    PAYMENT PROCEDURES

    1.01 SCHEDULE OF VALUES

    A. With first Application for Payment, submit three (3) copies of completed AIA Document G703 Continuation Sheet indicating the scheduled value of major categories and subcontracts for the Work, for approval of the Architect.

    B. For each item, provide a column for listing:

    1. Item number 2. Description of Work 3. Scheduled Value 4. Previous Applications 5. Work in Place and Stored Materials under this Application 6. Authorized Change Orders 7. Total Completed and Stored to Date of Application 8. Percentage of Completion 9. Balance to Finish 10. Retainage.

    1.02 PAY REQUEST

    A. The form of Application for Payment shall be a notarized AIA Document G702, Application and Certification for Payment, supported by approved AIA Document G703, Continuation Sheet. A minimum of three (3) original copies of these forms shall be submitted for each application. Submit additional copies if requested by the Owner or Architect. 1. Present required information in typewritten form or on electronic media printout. 2. Execute certification by signature of authorized officer. 3. Use data from approved Schedule of Values. Provide dollar value in each

    column for each line item for portion of work performed and for stored products. 4. List each authorized Change Order as an extension on continuation sheet, listing

    Change Order number and dollar amount as for an original item of Work. B. With each Application for Payment submit lien releases for the previous payment,

    substantiation for stored materials, monthly progress reports and updates, and any other pertinent items required by the Owner or Architect and identified during the Pre-Construction Conference. 1. AIA Documents G706, Contractor's Affidavit of Payment of Debts and Claims,

    G706-A, Contractor's Affidavit of Release of Liens, Documents G707, Consent of Surety Company to Final Payment shall be used.

    2. If appropriate, G707-A, Consent of Surety to Reduction in or Partial Release of Retainage shall be used.

    C. When acceptable to the Owner, the Contractor may submit for payment on properly

    stored materials not yet incorporated into the work. Materials stored on the site must be in a secured area and be protected from damage, weather, theft or vandalism. The Contractor shall be responsible for replacing any damaged or missing materials.

    D. Materials stored off the job site must be in the supplier's storage area, separated from

    other materials, and clearly labeled for this particular project. Insurance certificates for the material naming the Owner as an additional insured, loss payee shall be delivered with the pay request.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC Emc2 Project No. 14219687.00

    Payment Procedures 01 29 00-2

    END OF SECTION

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 30 00 - 1

    SECTION 01 30 00

    ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

    PART 1 GENERAL

    1.01 SECTION INCLUDES

    A. Preconstruction meeting.

    B. Site mobilization meeting.

    C. Progress meetings.

    D. Construction progress schedule.

    E. Progress report and photographs.

    F. Coordination drawings.

    G. Submittals for review, information, and project closeout.

    H. Number of copies of submittals.

    I. Submittal procedures.

    1.02 PROJECT COORDINATION

    A. Cooperate with the Owner's Project Coordinator in allocation of mobilization areas of site; for field offices and sheds (if applicable), for construction access, traffic, and parking facilities.

    B. During construction, coordinate use of site and facilities through the Project Coordinator.

    C. Comply with Project Coordinator's procedures for intra-project communications; submittals, reports and records, schedules, coordination drawings, and recommendations; and resolution of ambiguities and conflicts.

    D. Comply with instructions of the Owner's Project Coordinator for use of temporary utilities and construction facilities.

    E. Make the following types of submittals to Architect through the Project Coordinator:

    1. Requests for interpretation.

    2. Requests for substitution.

    3. Shop drawings, product data, and samples.

    4. Test and inspection reports.

    5. Manufacturer's instructions and field reports.

    6. Applications for payment and change order requests.

    7. Progress schedules.

    8. Coordination drawings.

    9. Closeout submittals.

    PART 2 PRODUCTS - NOT USED

    PART 3 EXECUTION

    3.01 PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING

    A. The Owner and/or Architect will schedule a meeting after Notice of Award.

    B. Attendance Required:

    1. Owner.

    2. Architect.

  • Emc2 Group Architects Planners, PC

    Emc2 #14219687.00 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS Vail Sycamore Elementary School Roof Repair 01 30 00 - 2

    3. Contractor.

    4. Roofing Product Supplier.

    C. Agenda:

    1. Execution of Owner-Contractor Agreement.

    2. Submission of executed bonds and insurance certificates.

    3. Distribution of Contract Documents.

    4. Submission of list of Subcontractors, list of Products, schedule of values, and progress schedule.

    5. Designation of personnel representing the parties in Contract, and Architect.

    6. Procedures and processing of field decisions, submittals, substitutions, applications for payments, proposal request, Change Orders, and Contract closeout procedures.

    7. Scheduling.

    D. Recorded minutes will be distributed within two days after meeting to all participants; Architect, Owner, Contractor, other participants, and all others affected by decisions made.

    3.02 PROGRESS MEETINGS

    A. Schedule and administer meetings throughout progress of the Work at maximum monthly intervals.

    B. Make arrangements for meetings, prepare agenda with copies for participants, and preside at meetings.

    C. Architect will make arrangements for meetings, prepare agenda with copies for participants, and preside at meetings.

    D. Attendance Required: Job superintendent, major Subcontractors and suppliers, Owner, Architect, as appropriate to agenda topics for each meeting.

    E. Agenda:

    1. Review minutes of previous meetings.

    2. Review of Work progress.

    3. Field observations, problems, and decisions.

    4. Identification of problems that impede, or will impede, planned progress.

    5. Review of submittals schedule and status of submittals.

    6. Maintenance of progress schedule.

    7. Corrective measures to regain projected schedules.

    8. Planned progress during succeeding work period.

    9. Maintenance of quality and work standards.

    10. Effect of proposed changes on progress schedule and coordination.

    11. Other business relating to Work.

    F. Record minutes and distribute copies within two days after meeting to participants, with two copies to Architect, Owner, participants, and those affected by decisions made.

    3.03 PROGRESS REPORTS

    A. Prepare and maintain weekly progress reports reflecting weekly progress, throughout the course of the project. Report will reflect daily activities, work accomplished a