Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

download Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

of 57

Transcript of Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    1/57

    OPTIMIZATION OF MATERIAL HANDLING IN ROOF

    SHEET ASSEMBLY FOR RAILWAY COACHES

    A PROJECT REPORT

    Submitted By

    ABINESH MARAN. T 20061401

    VASANTHI. R 20061436

    VENKATRAJ. N 20061438

    VIGNESH. M 20061439

    in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree

    of

    BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING

    in

    MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

    DEPARTMENT OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

    COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, GUINDY

    ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI::CHENNAI 600 025

    MAY 2010

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    2/57

    ANNA UNIVERSITY CHENNAI::CHENNAI 600 025

    BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE

    Certified that this project report on OPTIMIZATION OF MATERIAL

    HANDLING IN ROOF SHEET ASSEMBLYFOR RAILWAY COACHES

    is the bonafide work of

    ABINESH MARAN. T 20061401

    VASANTHI. R 20061436

    VENKATRAJ. N 20061438

    VIGNESH. M 20061439

    who carried out the project work under my supervision.

    Dr.T.V.MOORTHY Dr. M. OMKUMAR

    PROFESSOR AND HEAD SENIOR LECTURER

    Department of Manufacturing Engg. Department of Manufacturing Engg.

    College of Engineering, Guindy College of Engineering, Guindy

    Anna University Chennai Anna University Chennai

    Chennai 600025 Chennai 600025

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    3/57

    ABSTRACT

    Degree : Bachelor of Engineering

    Branch : Manufacturing Engineering

    Month and year of submission : May 2010

    Course : MN483 Project Work

    Title of the project : Optimization of Material Handling in roof

    sheet assembly for Railway coaches

    Name of the students : Abinesh Maran. T 20061401

    Vasanthi. R 20061436

    Venkatraj. N 20061438

    Vignesh. M 20061439

    Name and Designation of guide : Dr. M.Omkumar

    Senior Lecturer,

    Dept. Of Manufacturing Engineering,

    College Of Engineering, Guindy

    Anna University, Chennai

    Chennai 600 025

    The topic deliberated here mainly deals with the optimization of the production

    process at the Integral Coach Factory, Chennai. The crux of the topic here is that

    the amount of material handled in the shop floor is generally 9 times more than that

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    4/57

    is actually used to produce the final product. Hence this project is aimed at

    reducing the work in progress inventory to the least. Also, to device a method to

    store the work in progress inventory (steel sheets). This project includes optimizing

    algorithms, facility planning for efficient production and systematic study on

    various storage techniques for steel sheets to finally zero in on the most

    economical way of storage not compromising on quality and safety, therefore

    helping the organization in increasing the productivity, reducing the cost and

    reducing scrap in the form of rust.

    Date:

    Place: Chennai

    ABINESH MARAN. T

    20061401

    VASANTHI. R

    20061436

    VENKATRAJ. N

    20061438

    VIGNESH. M

    20061439

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    5/57

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We would like to sincerely thank Dr.M.OMKUMAR, senior

    lecturer , Department of Manufacturing Engineering for his invaluable guidance,

    support, encouragement and keen interest, which helped us in the successful

    completion of our project.

    We wish to thank Dr.T.V.MOORTHY, professor and head,

    Department of Manufacturing Engineering, for providing support towards the

    completion of the project.

    We solemnly thankDr.S.GOWRI, Professor, project coordinator and

    Mr.G.SHAKTHINATHAN, Lecturer, Department of Manufacturing Engineering,

    for their valuable suggestions.

    We are very much thankful to Mr.RAMAKRISHNAN, sectional

    engineer, ICF, for his immense care and guidance from the start of the project and

    till the completion of it.

    We also wish to express our hearty thanks to all the faculty members

    of Department of Manufacturing Engineering for their time being help and

    encouragements towards the successful completion of our project.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    6/57

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    CHAPTER NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

    ABSTRACT iii

    LIST OF FIGURES ix

    LIST OF TABLE x

    1. INTRODUCTION1.1 Integral Coach Factory- A Short Presentation 1

    2. CRUX OF THE CONUNDRUM

    2.1 Current Scenario 2

    2.2 Problems

    2.3 Objective of the Project

    2.4 Aim of the Project

    3. OPTIMIZATION OF PLANT LAYOUT

    3.1 Plant layout

    3.2 Objective of Plant Layout

    3.3 Factors Affecting Plant Layout

    3.4 Types of Plant Layout and Function

    3.4.1 Process Layout

    3.4.2 Product Layout

    3.4.3 Combination Layout

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    7/57

    3.4.4 Fixed Position Layout

    3.4.5 Cell Layout

    3.5 Procedure for Design of Plant Layout

    3.6 Process Flow

    4 AUTOMATED LAYOUT DESIGN PROGRAM

    4.1 Relationship Chart

    4.2 Steps of ALDEP

    4.3 Data Collected

    4.4 Relationship Chart for Data collected

    4.5 Filling The Cells

    5 MATERIAL HANDLING

    5.1 Material Handling Equipment

    5.1.1 Transport Equipment

    5.1.2 Positioning Equipment

    5.1.3 Unit Load Formation Equipment

    5.1.4 Storage Equipment

    5.1.5 Identification and Control Equipment

    5.2 Principles of MHE

    5.3 Automatic Guided Vehicles

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    8/57

    5.3.1 Navigation

    5.3.2 Wired Sensor

    5.3.3 Guide Tape

    5.3.4 Steering Control

    5.3.5 Path Decision

    5.3.6 Frequency Select Mode

    5.3.7 Path Select Mode

    5.3.8 Magnetic Tape Mode

    5.3.9 Vehicle Types

    5.3.10 Common AGV Applications

    6 GALVINIZING PROCESS

    6.1 Types of Surface Protection

    6.2 Elements of Galvinizing Process

    6.2.1 Surface Prepartion

    6.2.2 Galvinizing

    6.2.3 Inspection

    6.3 Benefits of Galvinizing Process

    7 CONCLUSION

    REFERENCE

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    9/57

    LIST OF FIGURES

    FIGURE No. TITLE PAGE No.

    2.1 Stack of materials

    2.2 Assembly fixture

    4.1 Existing layout

    4.2 Proposed machine cell layout

    5.1 Transport equipment

    5.2 AGV moving in shop floor

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    10/57

    LIST OF TABLES

    TABLE No. TITLE PAGE No.

    2.1 Assembly time

    4.1 Closeness value

    4.2 Area of each machine cell

    4.3 Relationship chart

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    11/57

    CHAPTER 1

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 INTEGRAL COACH FACTORY: A SHORT PRESENTATION

    Started in 1952, the Integral Coach Factory (ICF) is located in suburbs of Chennai,

    India. Its primary products are rail coaches. Most of the coaches manufactured are supplied to the

    Indian Railways, but it has also manufactured coaches for railway companies in other countries,

    including Thailand, Burma, Taiwan, Zambia, Philippines, Tanzania, Uganda, Vietnam, Nigeria,

    Mozambique and Bangladesh. Recently, ICF exports coaches to Angola and Sri Lanka. The coach

    factory provides a number of different coaches primarily for the Indian Railways, primarily first

    and second class coaches, pantry and kitchen cars, luggage and brake vans, self propelled

    coaches, electric, diesel and mainline electric multiple units (EMU, DMU, MEMU), metro

    coaches and Diesel Electric Tower Cars (DETC), Accident Relief Medical Vans (ARMV),

    Inspection Cars (RA), Fuel Test Cars, Track Recording Cars, the latest coaches are for the Deccan

    Odyssey (a luxury train of the Indian Railways), and coaches for MRVC (world class coaches).

    An organization of such a potential is only able to make a profit of approximately Rs.

    20,00,000 a year. This is mainly because of huge work-in-progress (WIP) inventories and huge

    loss due to scrap caused by corrosion of the sheet metals. Thus need of the hour is to prevent the

    above two problems as far as possible.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    12/57

    CHAPTER 2

    CRUX OF THE CONUNDRUM

    2.1 CURRENT SCENARIO

    It takes three shifts to produce the roof for one bogie. The roof is totally made of 7 sets of

    sheet metal and each set contains 3 sheet metals profiled and welded together. A deeper

    investigation reveals that the roof sheet assembly requires not only the sheets but a skeleton to

    provide structure to it and an L stiffener and U stiffener for support and strength. Hence the

    skeleton assembly alone takes one full shift and the grinding and hammering of the final

    assembly requires another shift, which leaves the roof sheet assembly with only a shift.

    In the single shift the sheet metal must be straightened, cut to length, bent to the required

    profile, seam welded, bent at the edges and with all this process it must be routed to various

    machines and if anyone of the machines is not in a state to process the WIP inventory then it

    piles up quiet next to the machine causing the material to get exposed to the environmental

    conditions leading to corrosion as shown in fig 2.1.

    Fig 2.1 Stack of materials

    Another problem is that work in process is not routed progressively, which means the

    machines required for processing are not sequentially placed that leads to multiple transactions of

    the same material back and forth. Hence there is a huge loss of time in this process. So, the

    Overall production rate is 1400 coaches per year. The number of shifts taken, hrs per shift and the

    number of laborers for different types of coaches is given in table 2.1.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    13/57

    Type of coach Hrs per shift No. of shifts No. of laborers

    BG 6.7 3 10

    SCN 7.0 3 10

    SLR 7.2 3 10

    DC/DMU 7.5 3 10

    Table 2.1 Assembly time

    The following calculation quantifies the above:

    Consider BG (Broad Gauge):

    No. of sheets required = 7*3 = 21

    Total hrs = 20.1

    Laborers: 4 fitters and 6 welders

    20.1hrs distributed for structure building, handling, and welding, hammering and finishing

    operations.

    The above quantification is only for the assembly and prior to each part of the assembly, the

    respective forming and fabrication must be done within the scheduled time. The assembly fixture

    for the roof sheet is shown in fig 2.2.

    Fig 2.2 Assembly fixture

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    14/57

    2.2 PROBLEMS

    The efficiency of material handling system at present, in the existing shop floor layout is

    less than 10% i.e., the material handled is nine times the material being processed. A lot of human

    effort is being exploited in the handling of the WIP. This leads to huge lead times and at a point of

    time either the machine or the WIP is Idle within the shop floor.

    2.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT

    The main aim of this project is to optimize the material handling by reducing the number

    of trips in which the material is being handled. Also to suggest a method to protect the Work-in-

    Progress (WIP) inventory from getting corroded. Finally reducing the lead time in the production

    process and increasing the productivity.

    2.4 AIM OF THE PROJECT

    To increasethe rate of production. This can be achieved by reducing the WIP which

    in turn is brought about by optimizing the process layout.

    To reduce the number of accidentswhich is possible by devising a proper material

    handling equipment which carries the material from the start till the end progressively

    and reducing the manual handling

    To reducethe level of inventories.

    To reducethe overall material handling time.

    Implement a newmaterial handling systemfor hand ling roof sheets.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    15/57

    2.5 SUMMARY

    This chapter explains the current existing scenario in the shop floor for the manufacture of roof

    sheets and also lists out the various problems faced by the workers, both directly as well as

    indirectly during the manufacturing process. The main aim and objective of this project is also

    discussed in detail in this chapter.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    16/57

    CHAPTER 3

    OPTIMIZATION OF PLANT LAYOUT

    3.1 PLANT LAYOUT

    Plant Layout means the physical arrangement of the various Industrial facilities

    (equipment, material, manpower, etc.) within the plant. This arrangement includes the spaces

    needed for material movement, storage, indirect laborers and all other supporting activities or

    services as well as operating equipment and Personnel. Plant Layout is the basis of industrial

    activity since it determines the efficiency. Generally what is being achieved is arrangement of

    work areas and equipment which is the most economical and at the same time safe and satisfying

    employees.

    Plant Layout is concerned with the analysis, planning, and design of the physical facilities

    utilized in the production of goods and services. Material Handling deals with that phase of the

    operations which involves the movements of the material used in carrying on the activities of the

    enterprises. No two aspects of industrial activity are more closely related. Actually, Material

    Handling is a Major part of nearly all Plant Layout work. This close relationship is emphasized in

    the following definition of Plant Layout:

    Plant Layout may be defined as planning and integrating the paths of the component

    parts of a product to obtain the most effective and economical inter relationships between

    men, equipment and the movement of material from receiving, through fabrication, to the

    shipment of the finished product, (H.A.HARDING, 1997).

    Plant layout planning includes decisions regarding the physical allocation of the economic

    activity centers in a facility. An economic activity center is any entity occupying space. The

    objective of plant layout planning is a more effective work flow at the facility, allowing workers

    and equipment being more productive. Facility layout techniques apply to the case where several

    physical means have to be located in a certain area, either industrial processes or services. The

    objective of the chapter is not only plant layout but re-layout also (most common situation for a

    company). To carry out an appropriate plant layout, its important to take into account the

    business strategic and tactical objectives. Example: space requirements / cost per m2 in Malls;

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    17/57

    accessibility/ privacy in offices. To make a decision about layout planning, 4 different questions

    must have an answer:

    Which centers do we have to consider?

    How much space and capacity is required for each center?

    If there is not enough space, productivity may be reduced.

    Too much space is expensive and may also reduce productivity.

    How must the space be configured at each center?

    Space quantity, shape and the elements of the work center are related

    to each other.

    Where should each center be located at within the facility?

    The allocation of the different centers may affect productivity.

    The plant layout process starts at an aggregate level, taking into account the different

    departments. As soon as we get into the details, the different issues arise, ant the original

    configuration may be changed through a feedback process. Most (if not all of them) layouts are

    designed properly for the initial conditions of the business, although as long as the company

    grows and has to be adapted to internal and external changes, a re-layout is necessary.

    The reasons for a re-layout are based on 3 types of changes:

    Changes in production volumes

    Changes in processes and technology

    Changes in the product

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    18/57

    3.2OBJECTIVES OF PLANT LAYOUTThese main objectives are reached through the attainment of the following facts:

    Congestion reduction

    Elimination of unnecessary occupied areas

    Reduction of administrative and indirect work

    Improvement on control and supervision

    Better adjustment to changing conditions

    Better utilization of the workforce, equipment and services

    Reduction of material handling activities and stock in process

    Reduction on parts and quality risks

    Reduction on health risks and increase on workers safety

    Moral and workers satisfaction increase

    Reduction on delays and manufacturing time, as well as increase in production capacity

    All these factors will not be reached simultaneously, so the best solution will be a balance

    among them.

    3.3FACTORS AFFECTING PLANT LAYOUTThe final solution for a plant layout has to take into account a balance among the

    characteristics and considerations of all factors affecting plant layout, in order to get the

    maximum advantages.

    The factors affecting plant layout can be grouped into 8 categories:

    Materials

    Machinery

    Labor

    Material handling

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    19/57

    Waiting time

    Auxiliary services

    The building

    Future changes

    3.4 TYPES OF PLANT LAYOUT AND FUNCTION

    There are five different types of plant layouts each serving a particular purpose and has its own

    advantages as explained below.

    3.4.1 PROCESS LAYOUT OR FUNCTIONAL LAYOUTIt is characterized by keeping similar machine or similar operations at one location

    (Place). In other words, all lathes will be at one place, all milling machine at another and so on

    that is machine are to be arranged according to their function. Process layout for two products is

    shown in the fig 3.1. This type of layout is generally employed for industries engaged in job order

    production and non-repetitive kind of maintenance or manufacturing activities.

    Drilling Planning Grinding

    (1) (2) (5) (5)

    (2) (3)

    Milling Welding Assembly

    (1)

    (3) (4) (4) (6) (6)

    Product A:

    Product B:

    Fig 3.1 Process Layout

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    20/57

    Advantages of Process Layout

    1) Better Machine utilization allows lower investment on equipment.

    2) It is better to maintain continuity of production in event of

    (a) Machine breakdown

    (b) Storage of Raw material

    (c) Absence of workers

    3) It comes up with varying production schedules.

    4) It is adopted to a variety of products and to frequent changes in sequence of operations.

    3.4.2 PRODUCT LAYOUT OR LINE TYPE LAYOUT

    It implies that various operations on a product are performed in a sequence and the

    machines are placed along the product flow line, i.e., machines are arranged in the sequence in

    which a given product will be operated upon. This type of layout is preferred for continuous

    production, i.e. involving a continuous flow of in-process material towards the finishing product

    stage. A line layout for two products is given below in fig 3.2.

    Lathe Drill Grinder Assembly Paint shop

    Product A (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

    Planer Grinder Miler Lathe Welding

    Product B (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

    Fig 3.2 Product or Line Layout

    Advantages of Product Layout

    1) Less Handling of Material.

    2) Less material in process allows lower investment in materials.

    3) More effective use of labor

    (a) Through greater job specialization

    (b) Through ease of training

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    21/57

    (c) Through wider of labor supply

    4) Easier control

    (a) Of production allows less paper work.

    (b) Over workers allows easier supervision

    3.4.3 COMBINATION LAYOUT

    A combination of process and product layout combines the advantages of the both types of

    layouts. A combination layout is possible where an item is being made in different shape and

    sizes. In such cases machinery is arranged in a Process Layout but the process grouping is than

    arranged in a sequence to manufacture various types and sizes of product. The point to note here

    is that, no matter the product varies in size and type, the sequence of operations remain same or

    similar.

    3.4.4 FIXED POSITION LAYOUT

    In other types of Layouts discussed earlier, the product moves past stationary

    Production Equipment, whereas in these cases the reverse applies; men and equipment are moved

    to the material, which remains at one place and the product is completed at that place where the

    material lies. For e.g., aircraft manufacture, ship building, big pressure vessel fabrication. Fixed

    position layout for ship building industry is shown in fig 3.3

    Ship building yard

    inputs

    Fig 3.3 Fixed Position Layout

    Finished products

    (ship)

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    22/57

    3.4.5 GROUP OR CELL LAYOUT

    In a group or Cell Layout, the layout design is in not according to functional

    characteristics of machine, but rather by group of different machines (called Cells) that are

    necessary for the production of families of parts.

    3.5 PROCEDURE FOR DESIGN OF PLANT LAYOUT

    The ideal procedure for a plant layout is to build the layout around the productive process

    and then design the building around the layout. This may not be possible always, because the

    plant building may already be existing or the shape of plant site may not permit the construction

    of building to house the productive process, etc. Ultimately, one has to strike to balance between

    the two approaches. However various procedural steps involved in plant layout have been listed

    below:

    a. Accumulate basic data

    b. Analyze and coordinate basic data

    c. Decide the Equipment and Machinery required

    d. Select the material handling system

    e. Sketch plan of plot for making factory building

    f. Determine a general flow pattern

    g. Design the individual work stations

    h. Assemble the individual layout into the total layout

    i. Calculate the storage space required.

    j. Make flow diagram for workstations and allocate them to areas on plot plan,

    k. Plan and locate service areas,

    l. Make master layout,

    m. Check final layout, and

    n. Install the approved layout.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    23/57

    3.6 PROCESS FLOW

    Fig 3.4 Process Flow Chart

    Sheet metal

    cutting

    Seam welding to join

    the sheet metals

    Bending along the

    sides for the flow of

    rain water

    Alignment over the roof

    jig and welding

    Finishing operations

    hammering and buffing

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    24/57

    3.7 SUMMARY:

    This chapter gives the basic definition for plant layout and explains the various types of plant

    layouts in detail along with their pictorial representations and advantages. This chapter also

    explains the procedure and the relevant data required in order to design a new plant layout or even

    to modify the existing plant layout in order to overcome the disadvantages in the existing layout.

    Finally this chapter explains the flow of operations in the shop floor for the manufacturing of roof

    sheets.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    25/57

    CHAPTER 4

    AUTOMATED LAYOUT DESIGN PROGRAM

    Automated Layout DEsign Program (ALDEP) is a construction type algorithm. This

    algorithm uses basic data on facilities and builds a design by successively placing the department

    in the layout. After placing all the departments in the layout a score is computed. This is nothing

    but the sum of the closeness rating values of different neighboring department in the layout. This

    algorithm is repeated for a prespecified number of times and the best layout is selected based on

    the maximum layout score.

    The basic data required for this algorithm are listed below

    1. Total number of department

    2. Area of each department

    3. Length and width of layout

    4. Closeness rating of various pairs of department in the form of Relation chart

    5. Minimum department preference ( MDP) value.

    6. Sweep width

    7. Number of iterations to be performed

    8. Location and size of each restricted area in the layout if present.

    4.1 RELATIONSHIP CHART

    This chart is a triangular matrix whose elements represent the closeness relationships

    among the departments. The following notations as shown in table 4.1 are used to indicate the

    various degrees of closeness.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    26/57

    Closeness Notation Value

    Absolutely necessary A 64

    Especially important E 16

    Important I 04

    Ordinary closeness OK O 01

    Unimportant U 00

    Not desirable X -1024

    Table 4.1 Closeness value

    4.2 STEPS OF ALDEP:

    The ALDEP procedure is explained as follows:

    Step 0.Input:

    1. Number of departments in the layout.

    2. Area of each department.

    3. Length and width of the layout.

    4. REL-CHART (Relationship chart).

    5. MDP value.

    6. Sweep width.

    7. Number of iterations to be carried (N).

    8. Current iteration number (1), 1.

    9. Locations and sizes of fixed departments if present.

    10.Score of the current layout (It is assumed as a very high negative value before

    performing the first iteration).

    Step1. Select a department randomly and place it in the layout.

    Step2. Scan the relationship (REL) - chart and classify the unselected departments into lists,

    namely List A and List B.

    List A contains the unselected departments whose relationship values in relation to the lastly

    selected departments are less than the MDP value.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    27/57

    List B contains the unselected departments whose relationship values in relation to the lastly

    selected departments are greater than or equal to the MDP value.

    Step3.Is the List B empty? If so, go to step 4; otherwise, go to step5.

    Step4.Select a department randomly from List A and place it in the layout. Go to step 6.

    Step5. Select a department from List B which has the maximum REL value in relation to the

    lastly selected department and place it in the layout.

    Step6. Whether all departments are placed in the layout? If not go to step2; if yes, go to step7.

    Step7.Compute the score of the layout.

    Step8.Is the score of the layout more than the score of the current best layout? If yes, update the

    new layout as the current best layout and store the corresponding score. Otherwise, drop the new

    layout.

    Step9. Is the current iteration number I=N? I f yes, go to step 10; otherwise, increment the

    iteration number by one (I=I+1) and go to step 1.

    Step10.Print the current best layout and the corresponding score.

    4.3 DATA COLLECTED:The distance between the various machine cells and the area occupied by them in the shop

    floor is collected and presented in fig 4.1 and table 4.2. Also the process flow chart for the

    manufacture of roof sheet is shown in fig 3.4.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    28/57

    Fig 4.1 Proximity diagram for machine cells

    DEPARTMENT NAME AREA in Sq.Ft NUMBER OF

    SQUARES

    Cut To length Machine 115 x 32 = 3680 ~ 3600 36

    Profile Bending 25 x 40 = 1200 12

    Seam Welding 30 x 52 = 780 ~ 800 8

    Press Break 1 24 x 25 = 600 6

    Press Break 2 24 x 25 = 600 6

    Assembly 80x 40 = 3200 32

    Table 4.2 Area of each machine cell

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    29/57

    4.4 RELATIONSHIP CHART FOR DATA COLLECTEDThe proximity relationship between the various machines are specified using the notations

    A,E,I,O and U in table 4.3.

    cut to

    length

    machine

    Profile

    Bending

    Seam

    Welding

    Press

    Break 1

    Press

    Break 2

    Assembly

    cut to length

    machine

    0 A E A A O

    Profile Bending A 0 A U U I

    Seam Welding E A 0 U U E

    Press Break 1 A U U 0 I E

    Press Break 2 A U U I 0 E

    Assembly O I E E E 0

    Table 4.3 Relationship Chart

    Assumptions:

    Each machine in the shop floor is assigned a number and this number is used to represent

    the particular machine in the ALDEP table as shown in the iterations.

    1 - Cut to length machine

    2 - Profile bending

    3 - Seam welding

    4 - Press brake 1

    5 - Press brake 2

    6 -Assembly

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    30/57

    List:

    There are two lists A and B. list A contains the machines having least proximity values

    (o,u) and list B contains the machines having maximum proximity values (a,e,i).

    List A {o,u}

    List B a,e,i

    Relationship values:

    A - 64

    E - 16

    I - 04

    O - 01

    U - 00

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    31/57

    Fig 4.2 Existing layout

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    32/57

    4.5FILLING THE CELLSIteration 1 (Existing Layout):

    For cell 1: list A {6}, List B {2, 3, 4, 5}

    For cell 2: list A {4, 5}, List B {3, 6}

    For cell 3: list A {6}, List B {4, 5}

    For cell 4: list A {6}, List B {5}

    1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 3 3 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 3 3 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 3 3 5 5 6 6

    1 1 1 1 3 3 5 5 6 6

    1 1 1 1 4 4 5 5 6 6

    1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 6 6

    Relationship

    Score:

    1 2 = 64

    2 3 = 64

    2 6 = 04

    3 6 = 16

    3 1 = 16

    4 1 = 64

    4 3 = 1

    4 5 = 4

    5 6 = 16

    4 6 = 16

    1 3 = 16

    Total :281

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    33/57

    4.6 EXPLANATION:

    Iteration 1 gives the existing distribution of the machine cells in the shop floor. The pictorial

    representation of the existing shop floor is given in fig 4.2. The entire shop floor area and the area

    occupied by each machine along with the area for material storage are measured. The common

    factor from all the individual machine cell area is removed and tabular grids are drawn for the

    remaining area. In our case, 100 sq feet is taken as the common area factor and the remaining total

    are is calculated to be 100 sq feet. A 10x10 tabular grid is constructed, wherein each cell

    represents 1 sq feet. The grid is now filled with numbers, which are used to represent each

    machine cell as explained in assumption. The tabular grid is filled column wise taking two cells of

    a row at a time and also the filling is done in a continuous way starting from the first two cells of

    the first row and ending with the last two cells of the last row. The machines are then place in the

    same order along the shop floor. The best layout can be identified by trying all possible iterations

    and calculating the relationship score for each iteration. The maximum score corresponds to the

    most optimized layout. The first machine cell is selected randomly and the area occupied is filled

    along the tabular grid. Based on the closeness relationship between the filled machine cell and the

    remaining machine cells, two lists are created. They are known as list A and list B. list A consists

    of the machine cells having least closeness relationship with the previously filled machine celland list B consists of machine cells having the maximum closeness relationship with the

    previously filled machine cell. For instance iteration 1 is started by filling the tabular grid with

    number 1, which corresponds to the Cut to Length Machine. Now the list A for Cut to Length

    machine contains the assembly cell and list B consists of the remaining machines. Now, among

    the machine cells in list B, the one with maximum closeness value with machine cell 1 is selected

    and filled along the tabular grid. In this way the tabular grid is filled completely with all the

    machine cells. From the filled tabular grid, the machines which are in direct contact are identified

    and the relationship values are added together in order to calculate the total score for example: in

    iteration 1, machines 1 and 2 are in direct contact with each other and there corresponding

    closeness notation is A, which corresponds to a value of 64. Similarly all the closeness values of

    the machines which are in direct contact with each other are added and the final score is

    computed. The final score for iteration 1 is 281. In this way all possible iterations score were

    calculated and the highest score obtained was 313, which corresponds to iteration 3. Hence

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    34/57

    iteration 3 is considered to be the most optimized machine cell layout and its corresponding

    machine locations are shown in fig 4.2.

    Iteration 2: (Sample Iteration)

    1 1 4 4 4 4 5 5 2 2

    1 1 4 4 6 6 5 5 2 2

    1 1 1 1 6 6 5 5 2 2

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 2 2

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 2 2

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 2 2

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 3 3

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 3 3

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 3 3

    1 1 1 1 6 6 6 6 3 3

    For cell 1: list A {6}, List B{2, 3, 4, 5}

    For cell 4: list A {2, 3}, List B {5, 6}

    For cell 6: list A {}, List B {2, 3, 5}

    For cell 5: list A {2, 3}, List B {}

    Relationship

    Score

    1 4 = 64

    1 6 = 01

    4 6 = 16

    4 5 = 04

    6 5 = 64

    5 2 = 00

    6 2 = 04

    6 3 = 00

    Total: 153

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    35/57

    Iteration 3 (Optimized Layout):

    1 1 4 4 4 4 6 6 6 6

    1 1 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 5 5 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 5 5 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 6 6 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6

    1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 6 6

    For cell 1: list A {6}, List B {2, 3, 4, 5}

    For cell 4: list A {2, 3}, List B {5, 6}

    For cell 5: list A {2,3}, List B {6}

    For cell 2: list A {}, List B {3}

    Relationship

    Score

    1 4 = 64

    4 5 = 04

    1 2 = 64

    4 6 = 16

    5 6 = 16

    2 3 = 64

    3 6 = 16

    2 6 = 04

    2 5 = 01

    1 5 = 64

    Total: 313

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    36/57

    Fig 4.2 Proposed machine cell layout

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    37/57

    4.7 SUMMARY:

    This chapter deals with the algorithm used to modify the current layout into an optimized one.

    This chapter gives a detailed introduction about the ALDEP algorithm and explains the step by

    step procedure for using it. The various data collected from the shop floor, which are used as

    input to the algorithm, are presented using figures and tables. A pictorial representation of the

    existing and the suggested optimized layout along with its tabular grid diagram and explanation is

    also given in this chapter.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    38/57

    CHAPTER 5

    MATERIAL HANDLING

    Material Handling involves the movement of material, manually or mechanically in

    batches or one item at a time within the Plant. The movement may be horizontal, vertical or

    combination of horizontal or vertical. Material Handling is concerned with motion, time, quantity

    and space. Basically Material Handling is the art of implementing movement-economically and

    safely.

    5.1 MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENT

    Material Handling Equipment (MHE) is all equipment that relates to the movement,

    storage, control and protection of materials, goods and products throughout the process of

    manufacturing, distribution, consumption and disposal. Material Handling Equipment is the

    mechanical equipment involved in the complete system. Material Handling Equipment is

    generally separated into four main categories: storage and handling equipment, engineered

    systems, industrial trucks, and bulk material handling.

    MHE is the most critical component of cargo ground handling; shortages will significantly

    impact throughput capability. MHE is the primary platform for loading and unloading all DOD

    general and special cargo, including outsized and oversized components. MHE is the one that

    reduces manual material handling distances. Also MHE aims in reducing the WIP inventories

    which affects the productivity and profitability of an Organization /Industry through increased

    Lead time, Machining cycles etc. MHE is used for the movement and storage of material within a

    facility or at a site. Every organization in this world is looking for a material handling equipmentsolutions to improve their productivity, while reducing the potential of workplace injury. MHE is

    the mechanical equipment involved in the complete system. MHE is used for the movement and

    storage of material within a facility or at a site.

    MHE can be classified into the following five major categories:

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    39/57

    5.1.1. TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT

    Equipment used to move material from one location to another (e.g., between workplaces,between a loading dock and a storage area, etc.). The major subcategories of transport equipment

    are conveyors, cranes, and industrial trucks. The basic transportation equipments are shown in the

    fig 5.1.

    Fig.5.1 Transport Equipment

    The major subcategories of transport equipment are:

    Conveyors-Equipment used to move materials over a fixed path between specific points.

    Cranes-Equipment used to move materials over variable paths within a restricted area.

    Industrial Trucks-Equipment used to move materials over variable paths, with no restrictions

    on the area covered by the movement (i.e., unrestricted area).

    5.1.2. POSITIONING EQUIPMENT

    Equipment used to handle material at a single location so that it is in the correct position

    for subsequent handling, machining, transport, or storage. Unlike transport equipment, positioning

    equipment is usually used for handling at a single workplace. Material can also be positioned

    manually using no equipment.

    5.1.3. UNIT LOAD FORMATION EQUIPMENT

    Equipment used to restrict materials so that they maintain their integrity when handled a

    single load during transport and for storage. If materials are self-restraining (e.g., a single part or

    interlocking parts), then they can be formed into a unit load with no equipment.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    40/57

    5.1.4 STORAGE EQUIPMENT

    Equipment used for holding or buffering materials over a period of time. Some storageequipment may include the transport of materials (e.g., the S/R machines of an AS/RS, or storage

    carousels). If materials are block stacked directly on the floor, then no storage equipment is

    required.

    5.1.5. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT

    Equipment used to collect and communicate the information that is used to coordinate the

    flow of materials within a facility and between a facility and its suppliers and customers. The

    identification of materials and associated control can be performed manually with no specialized

    equipment.

    5.2 PRINCIPLES OF MHE

    The Seventeen MHE Principles remain constant.

    1. Least handling is best handling. The greatest economy in moving materials is secured by

    keeping handling to a minimum.

    2. Standardization of methods and equipment results in the reduction of costs of operation.

    Maintenance, repair, storage and issue procedures can be simplified.

    3. MHE must be selected for a multiple number of applications. Flexibility is the key.

    4. Specialized equipment should be kept to a minimum. Normally, first cost, cost of operations

    and maintenance costs are greater for special equipment than for standard equipment.

    5. Volume dictates the method of handling materials. The number of pieces to be moved

    determines the method of handling.

    6. The most essential phase of any program is planning. Material handling is no different.

    Factors requiring advanced planning include protection against weather and breakage, legal

    and physical restrictions in reference to transportation, the possibility of using unitized loads,

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    41/57

    the standardization of equipment and methods, the combination of material handling methods

    and the consideration of safety hazards.

    7. The length and number of moves of material should be kept to a minimum. Movement paths

    should be studies for the possibility of reducing "backtracking" and length of moves, resulting

    in better utilization of equipment and personnel.

    8. Equipment capacities should never be exceeded. Overloading causes excessive wear of

    equipment and creates accident potential.

    9. All materials handling activities should be analyzed for improvement possibilities by

    elimination, combination or simplification. Combination of operations may result in the

    simplification and reduction of the number of times material must be handled.10.The selection of MHE is based on the economies of operation. Greater payloads for each

    handling operation will result in less handling cost per piece.

    11.The "physical state" of materials is a factor in determining MHE. The three physical states of

    material - solid, liquid and gas - determine the method of containment (pack). This, in turn,

    influences the selection of MHE.

    12.The shortest distance between two given points is a straight line - utilize a straight line flow of

    materials whenever possible. The time to move materials can be reduced by using a straight

    line flow.

    13.Materials should move continuously along any production line. Choppy or broken flow causes

    confusion and delay. Most shipping and receiving operations should operate on the principle

    of continuous flow.

    14.All materials handling operations should follow a defined method. The standardization of the

    method will provide a basis for determining handling requirements.

    15.Short, irregular moves lend themselves to manual materials handling. When moves are short,

    irregular and load capacity of people is not exceeded, it may be more economical to use

    manpower.

    16.Whenever practicable materials should be prepositioned for the handling operations.

    Prepositioning places containers in position to facilitate picking up and/or moving and

    materials so they do not obstruct other materials.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    42/57

    17.Whenever practicable, materials should be moved in a horizontal plane or with the aid of

    gravity. The ideal lifting position is at the waist. The nearer to the waist that a container or

    part can be picked up and disposed, the greater will be the efficiency.

    5.3 AUTOMATIC GUIDED VEHICLES

    An automated guided vehicleor automatic guided vehicle(AGV) is a mobile robot that

    follows markers or wires in the floor, or uses vision or lasers. They are most often used in

    industrial applications to move materials around a manufacturing facility or a warehouse.

    Application of the automatic guided vehicle has broadened during the late 20th century and they

    are no longer restricted to industrial environments.

    AGVs increase efficiency and reduce costs by helping to automate a manufacturing

    facility or warehouse.

    AGVs can carry loads or tow objects behind them in trailers to which they can

    autonomously attach. The trailers can be used to move raw materials or finished product. The

    AGV can also store objects on a bed. The objects can be placed on a set of motorized (conveyor)

    and then pushed off by reversing them. Some AGVs use forklifts to lift objects for storage. AGVs

    are employed in nearly every industry, including pulp, paper, metals, newspaper, and general

    manufacturing. Transporting materials such as food, linen or medicine in hospitals is also done.

    An AGV can also be called a self-guided vehicle (SGV). Lower cost versions of AVGs

    are often called Automated Guided carts (AGCs) and are usually guided by magnetic tape. AGCs

    are available in a variety of models and can be used to move products on an assembly line,

    transport goods throughout a plant or warehouse, and deliver loads to and from stretch wrappers

    and roller conveyors.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    43/57

    5.3.1 NAVIGATION

    AGVs in a FMS are used to transport an object from point A to point B. AGVs navigatemanufacturing areas with sensors. There are two main sensors AGVs use for navigation, a wired

    and a wireless sensor.

    5.3.2 WIRED SENSOR

    The wired sensor is placed on the bottom of the robot and is placed facing the ground. A

    slot is cut in the ground and a wire is placed approximately 1 inch below the ground. The sensor

    detects the radio frequency being transmitted from the wire and follows it.

    5.3.3 GUIDE TAPE

    Many light duty AGVs (some known as automated guided carts or AGCs) use tape for the

    guide path. The tapes can be one of two styles: magnetic or colored. Magnetic and colored types

    have its own advantages and disadvantages respectively. The AGC is fitted with the appropriate

    guide sensor to follow the path of the tape. One major advantage of tape over wired guidance is

    that it can be easily removed and relocated if the course needs to change. It also does not involve

    the expense of cutting the factory or warehouse floor for the entire travel route. Additionally, it is

    considered a passive system since it does not require the guide medium to be energized as wire

    does. Colored tape is initially less expensive, but lacks the advantage of being embedded in high

    traffic areas where the tape may become damaged or dirty.

    5.3.4 STEERING CONTROL

    To help an AGV navigate it can use two different steer control systems. The differential

    speed control is the most common. In this method there are two sets of wheels being driven. Each

    set is connected to a common drive train. These drive trains are driven at different speeds in order

    to turn or the same speed to allow the AGV to go forwards and/or backwards. The AGV turns in a

    similar fashion to a tank. This method of steering is good in the sense that it is easy to maneuver

    in small spaces. More often than not, this is seen on an AGV that is used to transport and turn in

    tight spaces or when the AGV is working near machines. This setup for the wheels is not used in

    towing applications because the AGV would cause the trailer to jackknife when it turned.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    44/57

    The other type of steering used is steered wheel control AGV. This type of steering is

    similar to a cars steering. It is more precise in following the wire program than the differential

    speed controlled method. This type of AGV has smoother turning but cannot make sharp turns in

    tight spots. Steered wheel control AGV can be used in all applications; unlike the differential

    controlled. Steered wheel control is used for towing and can also at times have an operator control

    it.

    5.3.5 PATH DECISION

    AGVs have to make decisions on path selection. This is done through different methods:

    frequency select mode (wired navigation only), and path select mode (wireless navigation only)

    or via a magnetic tape on the floor not only to guide the AGV but also to issue steering commands

    and speed commands.

    5.3.6 FREQUENCY SELECT MODE

    Frequency select mode bases its decision on the frequencies being emitted from the floor.

    When an AGV approaches a point on the wire which splits the AGV detects the two frequencies

    and through a table stored in its memory decides on the best path. The different frequencies are

    required only at the decision point for the AGV. The frequencies can change back to one set

    signal after this point. This method is not easily expandable and requires extra guide cutting

    meaning more money.

    5.3.7 PATH SELECT MODE

    An AGV using the path select mode chooses a path based on preprogrammed paths. It

    uses the measurements taken from the sensors and compares them to values given to them by

    programmers. An AGV used in shop floor is illustrated in figure 5.2. When an AGV approaches a

    decision point it only has to decide whether to follow path 1, 2, 3, etc. This decision is rather

    simple since it already knows its path from its programming. This method can increase the cost of

    an AGV because it is required to have a team of programmers to program the AGV with the

    correct paths and change the paths when necessary. This method is easy to change and set up.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    45/57

    5.3.8 MAGNETIC TAPE MODE

    The magnetic tape is laid on the surface of the floor or buried in a 10 mm channel, not

    only does it provide the path for the AGV to follow but also sort strips of the tape in different

    combos of the strip tell the AGV to change lane and also speed up slow down and stop with north

    and south magnetic combos, this is used by TOYOTA USA and TOYOTA JAPAN.

    5.3.9 VEHICLE TYPES

    AGVS Towing Vehicleswere the first type introduced and are still a very popular type

    today. Towing vehicles can pull a multitude of trailer types and have capacities ranging

    from 8,000 pounds to 60,000 pounds.

    AGVS Unit Load Vehicles are equipped with decks, which permit unit load

    transportation and often automatic load transfer. The decks can either be lift and lower

    type, powered or non-powered roller, chain or belt decks or custom decks with multiple

    compartments.

    AGVS Pallet Trucksare designed to transport palletized loads to and from floor level;

    eliminating the need for fixed load stands.

    AGVS Fork Truckhas the ability to service loads both at floor level and on stands. In

    some cases these vehicles can also stack loads in rack.

    Light Load AGVSare vehicles which have capacities in the neighborhood of 500 pounds

    or less and are used to transport small parts, baskets, or other light loads though a light

    manufacturing environment. They are designed to operate in areas with limited space.

    5.3.10 Common AGV Applications

    Automated Guided Vehicles can be used in a wide variety of applications to transport

    many different types of material including pallets, rolls, racks, carts, and containers.

    AGVs excel in applications with the following characteristics:

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    46/57

    Repetitive movement of materials over a distance

    Regular delivery of stable loads

    Medium throughput/volume

    When on-time delivery is critical and late deliveries are causing inefficiency

    Operations with at least two shifts

    Processes where tracking material is important.

    Fig 5.2 AGV moving in shopfloor.

    A few examples of typical leasing costs for different size AGV systems:

    1 vehicle CHEP forklift type AGV system with up to 20 load and unload positions and a

    travel distance of up to 100 meters.

    Monthly cost for 5 years, with no residual: Rs 2,09,500/month

    3 vehicle CHEP forklift type AGV system with up to 50 load and unload

    Positions and a travel distance of up to 200 meters.

    Monthly cost for 5 years, with no residual: Rs 4,61,000/month

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    47/57

    5 vehicle CHEP forklift type AGV system with up to 100 load and unload positions and a

    travel distance of up to 300 meters.

    Monthly cost for 5 years, with no residual: Rs 7,12,250/month

    5.3.11 SUGGESTED AGV SPECS:

    Flexible magnet floor tape guidance

    Travel speed 120 feet/min

    Tow capacity 2,000 lbs.

    Carry capacity 1,700 lbs

    Auto charge

    Roller decks

    Towed carts

    Remote call

    5.3.12 AGV SET UP SPECIFICATIONS AND COST:

    1 SavantCart Model 100 HD (tow or carrier style)

    500 feet magnet floor tape

    1 Battery set

    1 Battery charge

    2 Path branches

    Savant installation

    Savant training

    1 year warranty

    24/7 service hotline

    TOTAL COST Rs. 26,56,500/-

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    48/57

    5.4 SUMMARY:

    This chapter gives a basic definition for material handling and explains in detail the variousmeans of material handling inside shop floor. The main area of focus in this chapter is the AGV,

    it explains the various types of AGVs their advantages and rent per month. Finally this chapter

    concludes with the specifications and cost of the AGV proposed suiting the conditions of the

    factory.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    49/57

    CHAPTER 6

    MATERIAL HANDLING MECHANISM

    6.1 AUTOMATED TABLE ACTUATION

    This mechanism is employed for the handling of roof sheets once they are seam welded. The roof

    sheets are at present being handled manually by picking them and placing them over the trolleys

    through human effort. This process involves the following steps which are:

    1. Placing the roof sheet horizontally over the trolley once the seam weld is made.

    2. Manual movement of the trolley to the assembly shop.

    3. Changing the orientation of the roof sheet from horizontal to vertical while lifting it using

    the crane.

    4. Then placing the roof sheet over the roof jig horizontally, which involves another change

    in the orientation.

    In order to reduce the time consumption due to above steps, we have devised the following

    material handling system. Which involves the usage of hydraulically actuated table and a mobile

    bin for the vertical storage of root sheets that can be coupled with the AGVs mentioned above.

    6.2 MECHANISM

    The mechanism with which the hydraulically actuated table moves, such that the roof sheets are

    stored vertically inside the mobile bin is explained below

    6.2.1 MOBILE BIN

    This is used to carry the roof sheets in vertical orientation. The main purpose for designing this

    mobile bin is to save time in the handling of roof sheets. Since the roof sheets are stored in

    vertical position there is no wastage of time in changing. the orientation of the roof sheet from

    horizontal to vertical and then vice versa. This mobile bin can be coupled with the AGV for its

    movement from the seam welding machine cell to the assembly area.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    50/57

    6.2.2 HYDRAULICALLY ACTUATED TABLE

    This table is designed in such a way that it can tilt itself to a maximum of 45 degrees. The purposeof this table is to automate the movement of the roof sheets after seam welding, to store them in

    the mobile bin vertically. This table is hydraulically actuated with three links of which one is

    stationary and the other two are extendable. The height of the table from the ground is 225 cms

    which in turn is equal to the height of the stationary link and its outer diameter is 25cms. The first

    extendable link which is in direct contact with the stationary link extends to a height of 200cms

    and its outer diameter is 22cms. The second extendable link which is in direct contact with the

    first extendable link extends to a height of 175 cms, whose outer diameter is 20 cms. When the

    two extendable links are in their maximum extended position the table is lifted to a height of 600

    cms from ground, thereby making an angle of 45 degrees with its stationary leg. The assembly of

    the Table and Mobile bin is shown in fig 6.1.

    Fig 6.1 Table and Bin

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    51/57

    6.3 SUMMARY:

    This chapter discusses the storage mechanism for the automated vertical storage of the roof sheet

    in order to reduce the handling time and automate the material handling. This includes the design,

    construction and working of the mobile bin and the storage table mechanism.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    52/57

    CHAPTER 7

    GALVINIZING PROCESS

    Hot dip galvanizing is the process of applying a zinc coating to fabricated iron or steel

    material by immersing the material in a bath consisting primarily of molten zinc.

    7.1 TYPES OF SURFACE PROTECTION

    Barrier protection is perhaps the oldest and most widely used method of corrosion

    protection. It acts by isolating the metal from the electrolytes in the environment. Two important

    properties of barrier protection are adhesion to the base metal and abrasion resistance. Paint is one

    example of a barrier protection system.

    Cathodic protection is an equally important method for preventing corrosion. Cathodic

    protection requires changing an element of the corrosion circuit, introducing a new corrosion

    element, and ensuring that the base metal becomes the cathodic element of the circuit.

    Hot dip galvanizing provides excellent barrier protection as well as cathodic

    protection.

    7.2 ELEMENTS OF GALVINIZING PROCESS

    The galvanizing process consists of three basic elements:

    Surface Preparation

    Galvanizing

    Inspection

    7.2.1 SURFACE PREPARATION

    Surface preparation is the most important step in the application of any coating. In most

    instances where a coating fails before the end of its expected service life, it is due to incorrect or

    inadequate surface preparation.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    53/57

    The surface preparation step in the galvanizing process has its own built-in means of

    quality control in that zinc simply will not react with a steel surface that is not perfectly clean.

    Any failures or inadequacies in surface preparation will be immediately apparent when the steel is

    withdrawn from the molten zinc because the unclean areas will remain uncoated. Immediate

    corrective action is taken.

    Surface preparation for galvanizing typically consists of three steps: caustic cleaning, acid

    pickling, and fluxing.

    1. Caustic Cleaning - A hot alkali solution often is used to remove organic contaminants

    such as dirt, paint markings, grease, and oil from the metal surface. Epoxies, vinyl,

    asphalt, or welding slag must be removed before galvanizing by grit blasting, sand

    blasting, or other mechanical means.

    2. Pickling - Scale and rust normally are removed from the steel surface by pickling in a

    dilute solution of hot sulfuric acid or ambient temperature hydrochloric acid.

    3. Fluxing- Fluxing is the final surface preparation step in the galvanizing process. Fluxing

    removes oxides and prevents further oxides from forming on the surface ofthe metal prior

    to galvanizing and promotes bonding of the zinc to the steel or iron surface.

    7.2.2 GALVANIZING

    In this step, the material is completely immersed in a bath consisting of a minimum of

    98% pure molten zinc. The bath chemistry is specified by the American Society for Testing and

    Materials (ASTM) in Specification B 6. The bath temperature is maintained at about 850 F (454

    C).

    Fabricated items are immersed in the bath long enough to reach bath temperature. The

    articles are withdrawn slowly from the galvanizing bath and the excess zinc is removed by

    draining, vibrating, and/or centrifuging.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    54/57

    7.2.3 INSPECTION

    The two properties of the hot dip galvanized coating that are closely scrutinized after

    galvanizing are coating thickness and coating appearance. A variety of simple physical and

    laboratory tests may be performed to determine thickness, uniformity, adherence, and appearance.

    7.3 BENEFITS OF GALVANIZING PROCESS

    Lowest first cost

    Less maintenance/Lowest long term cost

    Long life

    Reliability

    Toughest coating

    Automatic protection for damaged areas.

    Complete protection

    Ease of inspection

    Faster erection time

    A full protective coating can be applied in minutes

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    55/57

    7.4 SUMMARY:

    This chapter deals with the concept of galvanization in order to protect the roof sheets from the

    effect of the atmosphere. This explains the various types and elements of galvanization process

    and also covers the various advantages of this process..

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    56/57

    CONCLUSION

    Through this project we were able to analyse the existing plant layout and various

    material handling techniques present at the integral coach factory. The major areas addressed here

    and solved were reduction in the WIP inventories, change in the existing plant layout thereby

    reducing the operation and assembly time for the same number of roof sheet assemblies or for the

    same time increase in the number being produced. Though the entire WIP inventory cannot be

    brought down to zero, we have suggested a technique to protect them from the effect of

    atmosphere thereby preventing corrosions. We have also suggested a new material handling

    technique in order to reduce the overall material handling time thereby increasing the productivity

    from 1400 coaches in the year 2009-2010 to more than 2000 post implementation. The significant

    improvements made are:

    Change in the plant layout, thereby decreasing the distance between the work centers,

    using ALDEP algorithm

    Increasing the overall productivity by 21.89%

    Reducing the Idle time of the machines thereby decreasing the overall WIP inventory.

    Devising a new material handling system bringing it close to automation.

    Suggestion of Galvanization process for the protection of roof sheets from corrosion.

  • 8/14/2019 Optimization of Material Handling: A Case Study

    57/57

    REFERENCE

    Bley. H and Zenner C. (2005), Handling of process and resource variants in the digital

    factory CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Systems, No 34 H. 2, p. 187-194.

    Bley.H, Fritz.J and Zenner.C (2006) Digital factory in automobile industry vol 101, no 1-

    2, p 19-23.

    Blumenau.J and Wuttke.C (2005), Application of the digital factory in the ramp up of

    production systems by using online-data vol 54, no 34(3), p. 241-245.

    Bracht.U and Masurat.T (2005), The Digital Factory between vision and reality vol 56, no

    4, p. 325-338.

    Cai,J and Weyrich.M (2004), Digital factory triggered virtual machining process planning

    for power train production in extended enterprise vol 32, no 3, p 332-342.

    Cai,J and Weyrich.M (2004), Supplier integrated power train machining process planning in

    digital factory vol 19, no: 4, p. 565-572.

    Hummel.V and Westkmper, E (2006), Factory Life Cycle Management vol 107, no 4, p.

    178-182.

    Gausemeier, J and Stollt,G (2006), Digital factory and virtual production vol 101, no 1-2, p.

    28-34.

    ICF official website www.icf.gov.in.