OPTIMA OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Resources Management Turkish Stakeholder Meeting...

OPTIMA

OPTIMAOptimisation for Sustainable

Water Resources Management

Turkish Stakeholder Meeting

19-20 April 2006

IZMIR

22OPTIMA

As stated in D02 of OPTIMA on Socio-Economic Framework

Analysis;

“in line with one of the key tasks taken up in the EC Water

Framework Directive, the OPTIMA dissemination strategy is

centered on actively involving interested parties such as

relevant government departments, local communities,

water utilities, industry and commerce, agriculture,

consumers and environmental groups throughout the

project lifecycle” .

Concepts and Aims

33OPTIMA

Based on this strategy;

a 2-day stakeholder workshop was organized by SUMER between April 19-20, 2006 in Izmir, to set the basis for the optimization procedure of OPTIMA to be applied for the Gediz case study.

Invitations were extended to a total of 106 persons, representing local, regional and national governmental/private institutions and NGOs.

Of the total invited, 45 stakeholders contributed to the meeting.

44OPTIMA

The distribution of participants with respect to the sectors and institutions

SECTOR GOVERNMENTAL MUNICIP. NGOs IAs* UNIVER.**INDUSTR

Y

FUNCTIONPlanning / Monitoring /

Management

Research /

Monitoring

Monitoring

Planning / Monitoring

Domestic water users

Irrigation

Water Users

ResearchIndustrial

water users

GROUP 1 DSI (2 Persons)THAEM

(1)IZMIR MoE Prov. Dir. (1)

IZSU-Izmir Mun.(1) GEDIZ IA

(1)

Min. of Agr. (1)

MoE-Aegean

Forestry (1)

GROUP 2 DSI (2)

MoE-Aegean

Forestry (1)

IZMIR MoE Prov. Dir. (1)

GEDIZ IA

(1)DEU (1)

Aegean Region

Cham. of Ind. (1)

GROUP 3 DSI (1)THAEM

(1)

MANISA MoE Prov.

Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1)

IZMIR Bird Paradise Ass. (1)

EGE UN (Agr.

Fac.) (1)

Min. of Agr. (1) UCPINAR Mun. (1)

GROUP 4 DSI (1)

MoE-Aegean

Forestry (1)

MANISA MoE Prov.

Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1) GEMA (1)

SALİHLİ Left Bank

(1)

EGE UN. (Agr.Fac.) (1)

EIE (1)

GROUP 5 DSI (1)THAEM

(1)

MANISA MoE Prov.

Dir. (1)IZSU-Izmir Mun (1)

Aegean Forestry Foundation (1)

SALİHLİ Left Bank

(1)

EİE (1) DMİ (State

Meteo Org)(1)

55OPTIMA

The distribution of participants with respect to the sectors and institutions

SECTOR GOVERNMENTAL MUNICIP. NGO IAs UNI.s IND.

FUNCTION Plan. , Mon., Man.

Res., Mon.

Mon. Plan., Mon.,

Man.

Irrig. Wat. Users

Res. Industrial water users

GROUP 1

GROUP 2

GROUP 3

GROUP 4

GROUP 5

66OPTIMA

The workshop has fulfilled the requirement of a participatory

approach, which is viewed in D02 of OPTIMA “as a means to

develop the tools needed for an optimum management of water

resources in direct, active consultation with the stakeholders,

leading to the creation of a favorable ‘atmosphere’ that is

aimed at gaining the understanding and acceptance of the

eventual OPTIMA findings by all stakeholders”

Concepts and Aims

77OPTIMA

The basic objective of the workshop also follows from D02 such

that “the active involvement of the stakeholders is … considered as

a means to assist … in the identification of any “conflicting”

demands on water resources, which can then be further assessed

in the context of possible ‘development scenarios’ … to

demonstrate through the use of appropriate modeling tools how

such conflicts could be reconciled in the context of a sustainable

approach to water resources management”

Concepts and Aims

88OPTIMA

Background Materials

The online “Water Issues Questionnaire” and the associated “Glossary” (derived from D01.1 on Requirements and Constraints Report prepared by FEEM);

D02 on Socio-Economic Framework Analysis prepared by IRMCO;

The online “CORRIDOIO ZERO Methodology for SH Active Involvement Within Decisional Process for water management Optimization” and the SH Workshop Guidelines prepared by Corridoio Zero;

The online questionnaires “CONSTRAINTS” and “INSTRUMENTS” prepared by ESS.

99OPTIMA

Using the above inputs and guidelines, the program for a two

day workshop was worked out in a way to best derive

stakeholder ideas and preferences, which could also reflect

those of various sectors (i.e., planners, decision makers, water

users, researchers, and NGOs).

The organization of the workshop activities was also intended

to facilitate scenario development for the optimum

management of the Gediz Basin.

Background Materials

1010OPTIMA

Workshop Program

1111OPTIMA

Questionaire I

The online “Water Issues Questionnaire” and the associated

“Glossary”, has been used as “Questionaire I” regarding all

issues ;

- Physical Conditions,

- Water Management,

- Water Demand,

- Water Supply

1212OPTIMA

Questionaire I

Although this questionnaire was already run within the first year

of the project, the results were not considered very reliable

since the stakeholders selected then were requested to fill in

the forms via e-mail or fax.

Accordingly, this questionnaire was repeated at the workshop

to update Turkey’s issues questionnaire database. At this first

step of the workshop, each stakeholder was requested to fill in

the forms individually.

1313OPTIMA

Questionaire II

This questionnaire was filled out by 5 different groups of

stakeholders to determine priorities and trends with regard to

water issues.

Through this questionnaire, it was intended to identify the key

issues in the Gediz Basin, that should be addressed in scenario

development.

1414OPTIMA

This questionnaire specifies the contraints on the optimization

procedure, having the objectives and scenarios defined in

Questionnaire II.

Questionaire III

GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS

CONCEPT VALUE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >

Reliability of supply (average over all nodes/days) > %

Cost / Benefit ratio >

Total benefits > M€

Investment costs < M€

Total cost including penalties < M€

Unallocated water (daily average flow) < m3/s

Overall water content change/decrease < Mm3

Relative content change/decrease < %

Days with flooding <

1515OPTIMA

SECTORAL CONSTRAINTS

AGRICULTURE


Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > %


HEAVY INDUSTRY




LIGHT INDUSTRY




COMMERCE




Questionaire III

1616OPTIMA

SERVICES




HOUSEHOLDS




TOURISM





Questionaire III

1717OPTIMA

Questionaire III

LOCAL (NODE specific) CONSTRAINTS

NODE CONCEPT FROM TO VALUE

1818OPTIMA

Questionaire IV

This questionnaire specifies the instruments to be used for each

scenario within the optimization procedure, having the objectives

and scenarios defined in Questionnaire II and constraints in

Questionnaire III

1919OPTIMA

SCOPE OF APPLICATION: GLOBAL

DESCRIPTION OF THE INSTRUMENT

COSTSEFFECTIVENESS

Parameter affected, valueInvestment Operational

Questionaire IV

2020OPTIMA

1.SECTORIAL INSTRUMENTSIRRIGATED AGRICULTURE


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


RAINFED AGRICULTURE


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


HEAVY INDUSTRY


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Questionaire IV

2121OPTIMA

LIGHT INDUSTRY


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


DOMESTICMUNICIPAL


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


TOURISTIC


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Questionaire IV

2222OPTIMA

COMMERCIAL


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


SERVICES


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Questionaire IV

2323OPTIMA

Results of QuestionairesQ1

OVERALL RESULTS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE I:

PHYSICAL CONDITIONS:

- Watershed Degradation

- Water Scarcity

- Droughts

WATER MANAGEMENT:

- Education and Awareness

- Institutional Framework:

- Institutional Responsibilities

- Active Participation

2424OPTIMA

WATER DEMAND:- Agriculture

- Surface Water Demands- Groundwater Demands

- Industry:- Surface Water Pollution by Industry

WATER SUPPLY:- Quality:

- Surface Water Quality- Groundwater Quality

- Infrastructures:- Sanitations: Sewers and Treatment


RESULTS OF QUETIONAIRE 1 IN EXCEL SHEET

2525OPTIMA


OVERALL RESULTS FOR QUESTIONNAIRE II:

Issues in order of priority:

1.Water pollution (5/5)

2. Revision of the existing irrigation network (3/5)

3. Participatory water management (2/5)

4. Water scarcity (2/5)

5. Monitoring networks (2/5)

The least important issue: Water demand by tourism

2626OPTIMA


GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS (the numbers in parentheses show the averages of group responses)

CONCEPT VALUE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.3/ 1.2/ 1/1 (1.125)

Reliability of supply (average over all nodes/days) > 70/ 95// 90/90 (86.25)%

Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/1.5/1.5/1 (1.25)

Total benefits > M€

Investment costs < M€

Total cost including penalties < M€

Unallocated water (daily average flow) < /0 /0.15 /0.10 m3/s

Overall water content change/decrease < /0/100/50 Mm3

Relative content change/decrease < /10/10 %

Days with flooding <6/ 5 /2/1/1

2727OPTIMA



AGRICULTURE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.2/1.2/1.2/1 (1.15)

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/ 90/90/90 (90) %

Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/ 1//2/1 (1.25)

HEAVY INDUSTRY

Overall Supply / Demand ratio < 1

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90 %

Cost / Benefit ratio > 1

LIGHT INDUSTRY

Overall Supply / Demand ratio < 1/1/1.5/1 (1.125)

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 95 /90/90 %

Cost / Benefit ratio > /1/2/2/1

2828OPTIMA

COMMERCE

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >0.90/1.5/1

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/ 80/90 %

Cost / Benefit ratio > 1/1/2/1

SERVICES

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1/0.90/1.5/1 (1.1)

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > 90/100/90/ 90/90 %

Cost / Benefit ratio > /0.90/2/2/1

HOUSEHOLDS

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1.5/1.2/1.5/1(1.3)

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) > > 95/110/98/100/95 (100)%

Cost / Benefit ratio >0.80/1

TOURISM

Overall Supply / Demand ratio >1/1.5/1

Reliability of supply (daily average over all nodes) >100/99 /90/90 %

Cost / Benefit ratio > 1.2/2/1


2929OPTIMA

LOCAL (NODE specific) CONSTRAINTS

NODE CONCEPT FROM TO VALUE

Demirkopru reservoir

Amount of water to be stored

850 Mm3

WetlandWater to be allocated

5 Mm3


3030OPTIMA


SCOPE OF APPLICATION: GLOBAL


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Rehabilitation and renewal of irrigation technologies (3/5)

Construction of water treatment plants (3/5)

Education & training of water users (2/5)

Revision of legislation (2/5)

Completion of Gördes and Yiğitler Reservoirs (2/5)

3131OPTIMA

1.SECTORIAL INSTRUMENTSIRRIGATED AGRICULTURE


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Revision and rehabilitation of irrigation networks (5/5)

Applying better irrigation technologies in the field such drip irrigation (3/5)

Completion of reservoir investments (2/5)


3232OPTIMA

Results of QuestionairesQ4RAINFED AGRICULTURE


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Terracing (2/5)

Proper crop pattern selection(2/5)

HEAVY INDUSTRY


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


3/5 of the groups do not consider the existence of heavy industry in Gediz Basin

Construction of industrial wastewater treatment centers (2/5)

3333OPTIMA


LIGHT INDUSTRY


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Construction of a common industrial wastewater treatment plants for Kemalpasa Ind. Zone (3/5)

Reuse of recycled water from treatment centers in irrigation (3/5)

DOMESTICMUNICIPAL


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Construction of domestic wastewater treatment centers (4/5)

Rehabilitation of domestic water distribution networks (2/5)

3434OPTIMA

Results of QuestionairesQ4TOURISTIC


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


3/5 of groups do not consider tourism significant

Preventing thermal wastewater discharges to the river system (1/5)

Education & Training (1/5)

COMMERCIAL


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


3535OPTIMA

SERVICES


COSTSEFFECTIVENESS


Enforcing financial investments for domestic water supply (2/5)


3636OPTIMA

Overall Results

The results of both the individual questionnaires and the

group reports indicate the presence of 2 major problems

within the basin: water pollution and overexploitation

of water resources (i.e., water over-use)

3737OPTIMA

With respect to water pollution, the folllowing issues were considered significant and agreed upon by the stakeholders:

deficiencies in legislation regarding water pollution and water pollution control;

uncertainties in institutions’ enforcement capacities, responsibilities, contraints and scope;

significant needs for building of treatment plants at several points wastewater discharges;

problems related to operaional costs and O&M of existing treatment plants;

lack of public and water user awareness on basin water quality;

inefficient monitoring of water quality with respect to time frequencies and data reliability, which adversely affect water quality management practices and projections into the future.

Overall Results

3838OPTIMA

With respect to overexploitation of water resources (i.e., water over-use), the folllowing issues were considered significant and agreed upon by the stakeholders:

significant water losses in water conveyance systems of both the irrigation systems and the domestic water supply systems, which lead to increased water demand;

lack of public and water user awareness on overexpolitation of water and water scarcity;

inefficient and out-of-date irrigation systems and technologies, which lead to increased irrigation water demands;

lack of sufficient and reliable information on the amounts of water actually used by different sectors.

Overall Results

3939OPTIMA

39 stakeholders participated in the workshop on both days, and 41% of them

were women (16 out 39). The distribution of women with respect to working

groups and the institutions represented are given in following table.

GROUP I GROUP II

GROUP III GROUP IV GROUP V

DSI DSI DSI MoE Prov. Dir. IZSU

IZSU DSI IZSU MoE, Aegean Forestry

THAEM

THAEM MoE Prov. Dir.

MoE Prov. Dir. State Meteo. Org.

Chamber of Industry

Ministry of Agriculture

Gender Issues

4040OPTIMA

Gender Issues

The number of women in each category is:

State Meteo.Org.: Governmental Monitoring (1)

DSI : Governmental Planning (4)

İZSU : Municipality (3)

MoE Prov. Dir. : Governmental Monitoring (3)

THAEM : Governmental Research (2)

Chamber of Ind. : NGO (1)

Ministry of Agr. : Governmental Planning (1)

MoE, Forestry : Governmental Research (1)

4141OPTIMA

Gender Issues

Finally, the percentages of women participants with respect to management functions are:

Governmental – Planning : 31% (5/16)

Governmental – Monitoring : 25% (4/16)

Governmental – Research : 19% (3/16)

Municipality : 19% (3/16)

NGO : 6% (1/16)

4242OPTIMA

THANK YOU!

OPTIMA OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Resources Management Turkish Stakeholder Meeting...

Documents

Transcript of OPTIMA OPTIMA Optimisation for Sustainable Water Resources Management Turkish Stakeholder Meeting...