Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

17
Optical readout for a resonant gw bar

Transcript of Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Page 1: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Optical readout for a resonant gw bar

Page 2: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Old setup

Page 3: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

New alignment mirrors system

Page 4: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

New optical bench

Page 5: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Alignment prisms

Optical fiber

/2 plate

Mode-matching lenses

Auxiliary cavity

/4 plate

Page 6: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

DUAL sensitivity target

• Laser power = 7 W• Finesse = 106

Sxx = 10-45 m2/Hz

… butWith a waist of w = 1 mm:

SBr = 5·10-44 m2/Hz

Srp = 8·10-41 m2/Hz

We need a waist of w > 20 cm !!!!

Page 7: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Folded Fabry-Perot (FFP)

M1

M2

M3

M4

D

Signal: N

Brownian noise: N

Radiation pressure: N·F (constant)

Displacement noise: 1/F N

Linewidth ( bandwidth): 1/(N·F) (constant)

F. Marin, L. Conti, M. De Rosa: “A folded Fabry-Perot cavity for optical sensing in gravitational wave detectors”, Phys. Lett. A 309, 15 (2003)

Page 8: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

FFP for dual cylinder

0 50 100 15010-47

10-46

10-45

10-44

Brownian

20 W15 W10 W

D = 10 cmR = 100 m

Sxx

(m

2 /Hz-1

)

N

} shot-noise limited sensitivity

} radiation pressure effect

Fixed total length: 2.3 m

Page 9: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Prototype of FFP fabricated- Two parallel rows of mirrors on independent oscillating masses,

with resonance frequencies of 1 kHz and 2 kHz - Three possible configurations: - 2 mirrors (simple FP)

- 9 mirrors- 17 mirrors

Page 10: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Calculated response to modulated laser power

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Mechanical mirrors

Mechanical masses

Photothermal

Simple cavity (2 mirrors)

La

ser

fre

q. d

isp

lace

me

nt (

Hz/

W)

Frequency (Hz)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Mechanical mirrors

Mechanical masses

Photothermal

FFP 9 mirrors

La

ser

fre

q. d

isp

lace

me

nt (

Hz/

W)

Frequency (Hz)

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 100000.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

Mechanical mirrors

Mechanical masses

Photothermal

FFP 17 mirrors

La

ser

fre

q. d

isp

lace

me

nt (

Hz/

W)

Frequency (Hz)

Page 11: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Frequencyservo loop

Laser EOM1O.I.BS

PD1 QW

PBS

13.3 MHz

PD2

QWPBS

PD4

Cavity servo loopAOM

EOM2

C1

C2

PD3

Oscilloscope+

PC

Photo-thermal effect: direct measurements

Page 12: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Model for Photo-thermal + radiation pressure displacements

Page 13: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

High power: - Bistability- Kramers model for jump probability (wip)

Page 14: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Intermediate power: - Hopf bifurcation- ‘New’ dynamics (similar to FitzHugh-Nagumo)- Self oscillations

F. Marino, M. De Rosa and F. Marin, to be published on Phys. Rev. E

Page 15: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Q = 5

Q = 20

Q = 10

Page 16: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

Q = 103

Q = 103

Q = 104

Q = 105

Page 17: Optical readout for a resonant gw bar. Old setup.

The probability of a noise-induced state jump is non-zero

In any case, a tight locking is probably necessary

Several QND schemes are difficult to be implemented

Comparing two cavities, the laser must be in tight resonance

with both cavities

- two laser beams and heterodyne ??

(but the requirement on the phase noise of the reference tunable rf oscillator is

too stringent: -200dBc @ 2-5 kHz)

- locking the cavities (at least one) ??

(but high dynamic range and low noise are not easily obtained)