Opening up -staff attitudes to open learning
-
Upload
andybeggan -
Category
Education
-
view
1.779 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Opening up -staff attitudes to open learning
ldquoOpening Up Staff attitudes to open learningrdquo
OCWC Global7th May 2010
Andy BegganLearning Team Leader
The University of Nottingham
Outline of presentation
About Nottingham
Why open learning Strategic drivers
Background
Staff attitudes Focus group feedback
Staff survey results
Challenges
Activities
Impact on Nottingham
Next steps
About Nottingham
bull Research led institution
bull Student numbersbull 30000 students (postgrad and undergrad)
bull 6000 international (130 countries)
bull Six campuses (inc China and Malaysia)
bull E-Learning Support (Learning Team)bull Multimedia production unit
bull VLEs
bull E-assessment
bull Video production
bull Podcasting
bull E-learning development (Xerte)
1Social responsibility
2Promotional opportunities
3Cost efficiencies
Why is Nottingham involved
What is Nottingham doing
U-Now ndash OCWOER
Launched 2007
Member of OCWC 200
Visitors Up 67 over Q1 2009
UK HEAJISC funded through BERLiN project 200910
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Outline of presentation
About Nottingham
Why open learning Strategic drivers
Background
Staff attitudes Focus group feedback
Staff survey results
Challenges
Activities
Impact on Nottingham
Next steps
About Nottingham
bull Research led institution
bull Student numbersbull 30000 students (postgrad and undergrad)
bull 6000 international (130 countries)
bull Six campuses (inc China and Malaysia)
bull E-Learning Support (Learning Team)bull Multimedia production unit
bull VLEs
bull E-assessment
bull Video production
bull Podcasting
bull E-learning development (Xerte)
1Social responsibility
2Promotional opportunities
3Cost efficiencies
Why is Nottingham involved
What is Nottingham doing
U-Now ndash OCWOER
Launched 2007
Member of OCWC 200
Visitors Up 67 over Q1 2009
UK HEAJISC funded through BERLiN project 200910
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
About Nottingham
bull Research led institution
bull Student numbersbull 30000 students (postgrad and undergrad)
bull 6000 international (130 countries)
bull Six campuses (inc China and Malaysia)
bull E-Learning Support (Learning Team)bull Multimedia production unit
bull VLEs
bull E-assessment
bull Video production
bull Podcasting
bull E-learning development (Xerte)
1Social responsibility
2Promotional opportunities
3Cost efficiencies
Why is Nottingham involved
What is Nottingham doing
U-Now ndash OCWOER
Launched 2007
Member of OCWC 200
Visitors Up 67 over Q1 2009
UK HEAJISC funded through BERLiN project 200910
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
1Social responsibility
2Promotional opportunities
3Cost efficiencies
Why is Nottingham involved
What is Nottingham doing
U-Now ndash OCWOER
Launched 2007
Member of OCWC 200
Visitors Up 67 over Q1 2009
UK HEAJISC funded through BERLiN project 200910
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
What is Nottingham doing
U-Now ndash OCWOER
Launched 2007
Member of OCWC 200
Visitors Up 67 over Q1 2009
UK HEAJISC funded through BERLiN project 200910
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
The BERLiN project
Re-invigorate the U-Now (200910)
Capturing examples from across all campuses
Issues assigning credits Led to bdquomodule frameworks‟ Introduction to microeconomics
Rich learning objects add further depth
No limitations of what can be made available Podcasts and videos interactive learning content PDFs etc
Copyright bdquohurdles‟ main barrier
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Opening up Staff attitudes
Open learning focus groups (Summer 2009)
20 academic staff across 5 focus groups
All faculties at all levels of academic staff
Feedback grouped under themes Areas
+ve -ve neutral
Themes
Online staff survey (Mar 2010)
6 of academic staff
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Focus group feedback
19
154
138
Social responsibility
Promotion
Cost efficiencies
Focus groups
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Social responsibility Promotion Cost efficiencies
Distribution across themes
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
1 Social responsibility
ldquoI have got this feeling that there‟s people out there who don‟t have access to education and that they‟ve got access to the internet Maybe they could use these courses or sessions or the odd video or whatever to just top up what they cannot manage to get from their own education systemrdquo
Focus groups
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
1 Social responsibility
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Contribution
bullIndividual
bullSchool
bullConsortium
Clearance
bullPermissions
bullIPR
bullCopyright
Construction
bullAssembly
bullPackaging
bullURLs
Cataloguing
bullMetadata
bullKeywordstags
bullUpload
Circulation
bullOER aggregating sites
bullRSS feeds
bullWeb20
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Connections
bullInternal
bullExternal
bullPartnerships
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Strongly
Agree
11
Agree
56
Neutral
25
Disagree
7
Strongly
Disagree
1
Open Educational Resources (OER) can help build fruitful partnerships
with colleagues and institutions worldwide
Strongly
Agree
7
Agree
48
Neutral
38
Disagree
5
Strongly Disagree
2
Students benefit from the range of approaches available through the use
of Open Educational Resources(OER) in my teaching
Staff survey
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
OER Africa feedback on U-Now Address multiple audiences at the same time
Display
Intended level of use and target audience
Brief description
Licence
File size
Technical information and publisher
Downloading instructions
Different approaches to navigation (browse filter search)
Encourage editing and repurpose
UKOER~OER Africa UNESCO partnerships OER bdquoShopping list‟ to support African HEIs
International partnerships
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
2 Promotion
ldquoI don‟t think it would make any difference to our reputation as teachers The whole culture is research All the promotions and everything are through researchrdquo
ldquoI fought quite hard for the materials to be made more widely available than just within the University for a number of reasons It adds to the reputation of the Centre it attracts good tutors it‟s got lots of knock on effects that are very positiverdquo Focus groups
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
2 Promotion
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative Neutral
Focus groups
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
73
5660
47
66
72
22
44
33
58
97
51
34
22
42
47
21
30
15
What benefits do you see in publishingand using OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Open Courseware Consortium
Joined OCWC in 20078
One of 4 UK members Mathematical institute Oxford
Peoples-uniorg
The Open University
The University of Nottingham
Doubled visitors to U-Now Around 30 referrals to U-Now
Q1 2010 comes via OCWC
Submission via RSS
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Promotion of staff
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
3 Cost efficiencies
ldquo I‟ve used other people‟s materials and some stuff you see is terrible and other things you think oh that‟s a good idea I‟ll do it like that You pick and choose mix it up with your own stuff and I find that an incredibly positive processrdquo
ldquoThere would be issues over copyright principally images graphs figures data from papers and textbooks used willy-nilly in lectures because you don‟t have that fearhellip you are breaching copyrightrdquo
Focus groups
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
3 Cost efficiencies
Impact
Commercial
IPR
University showcase
Academic concerns
Academic promotion
Changing current practice
Development costs
Target audience
Learning strategies
Book sales
QA
Barriers for reuse
Loss of control
Positive Negative NeutralFocus groups
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Strongly
Agree
19
Agree49
Neutral
20
Disagree
10
Strongly
Disagree
2
I would only use OER in my teaching if I am able to edit and personalise the
materials for use with my students
Strongly
Agree
1
Agree
49Neutral
42
Disagree
6
Strongly Disagree
2
Reusing OER is a useful way of developing new courses
Staff survey
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Re-purposing OER
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
49
30 30
38
66
3337
23
53
15
35
28
35
46
27
33
39
59
32
38
29
43
9
46
3842
What types of open resources would you be most willing to publish or use
Publish Use
Staff survey
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
XPERT
Producer-centric models
Xerte Public E-learning ReposiTory
UK JISC funded under rapid innovation programme
To progress the vision of a distributed architecture of e-learning resources for sharing and re-use
Based on Xerte Online Toolkits wwwnottinghamacukxerte
wwwnottinghamacukxpert
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
XPERT
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
httpwwwnottinghamacukxpert
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
32
58
43
65
16
37
2123
119
3
8 8
13
55
25
16
2624
8
3
85 8 8
1
40
5
What barriers do you face in publishing and using
OER materials
Publishing Using
Staff survey
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Staff survey
Impact on Nottingham
Yes
29
No
68
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have submitted teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER
Yes
39
No
17
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will submit teaching and
learning resources for publication as OER in the
future
Yes
27
No
70
Unsure
3
Staff survey I have used OER from other
academics in my teaching
Yes
42
No
14
Unsure
44
Staff survey I will use OER from other academics
in my teaching in the future
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Next steps Social responsibility
UKOER~OER Africa framework
Promotion U-Now website review
School based and subject based RSS feeds
Support growth of local communities
Link to prospectuses school webpages
Cost efficiencies bdquoDigital literacy course‟
Appropriate reuse and repurpose of OER
Workshops seminars PGCHE
New tools and technologies
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk
Any Questions
httpunownottinghamacuk