Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and...
Transcript of Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and...
![Page 1: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Opening RemarksProf. Hiroshi Ohtsu
Meiji university
1
![Page 2: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited
– Meiji University 2019
Professor Mark V.Tushnet
2
![Page 3: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Traditionally constitutional review was final and unrevisableexcept through constitutional amendment with supermajority requirements (or regular replacement of judges)
• – Cooper v. Aaron in United States
3
![Page 4: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
• In early 1990s Stephen Gardbaum and I recognized that something new was happening
4
![Page 5: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Commonwealth model/weak-form review
• Decisions by constitutional courts could be revised by ordinary majorities
• Various forms: override/notwithstanding; declaration of incompatibility, interpretive mandate
• Defended as more consistent with democratic self-government in face of reasonable disagreements
• Opportunity to reconsider (in light of failures of understanding) and rationally disagree with judicial interpretation
5
![Page 6: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• I want to stress the important feature of weak-form review, that the legislative action following the court’s action would be guided by reference to constitutional norms – reasoned disagreement with the judges’ constitutional interpretations
6
![Page 7: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• One reason for weak-form review occurring in commonwealth nations is that in those nations there was a coherent theory of political constitutionalism (rather than judicial constitutionalism)
7
![Page 8: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
• According to political constitutionalism, constitutional norms are enforced primarily through politics
• For present purposes, two primary mechanisms
• First, a normative commitment among political elites to conform to the constitution (subordinating immediate policy to adherence to constitutional norms)
8
![Page 9: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• Second, competition between parties – when one party took an arguably anti-constitutional action, the opposing parties would point that out and make it part of the campaign against the ruling party
9
![Page 10: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Notably, this second mechanism won’t work well when there is a dominant party – India under the Congress Party and perhaps today under the BJP; South African under the ANC; and, one standard explanation for the way the Japanese Supreme Court has exercised its formal strong-form power is Liberal Party dominance
10
![Page 11: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• But it’s worth noting that if political constitutionalism doesn’t work well where there’s a dominant party, the examples all show that judicial constitutionalism – strong-form review –might not work well in such cases either
• Though the South African and Indian cases are quite complex, and not the focus of my lecture today.
11
![Page 12: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
• Today want to talk about the distinction between strong-form and weak-form review as seen with twenty or more years of hindsight
12
![Page 13: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• First, about weak-form review
• First observation is that weak-form review hasn’t spread beyond its initial jurisdictions (despite its apparent attractions)
• Notably, modern “populist” constitutions, like those in Latin America, retain strong-form review (but try to make the constitutional court more responsible to the people in the appointment process)
13
![Page 14: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• And reform efforts in strong-form nations haven’t argued for weak-form review but rather, again, for changes in appointment processes (India, Israel with qualifications)
• That weak-form review hasn’t spread might suggest that the normative case for it isn’t as powerful as I initially thought it was.
14
![Page 15: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• Second, the initial prediction or sense was that it was unstable – either it wouldn’t lead to invalidations or that it would become strong-form
• Neither has proven quite right, though the second is more accurate than the first
• Typically, declarations are followed by the legislature, as in strong-form review.
15
![Page 16: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Though that often is because the courts do identify overlooked problems rather than disagreements about constitutional interpretation
• Rarely there is permanent or near permanent resistance (British voting rights cases)
16
![Page 17: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
• And there have been statements by weak-form courts that, if they wanted to, they could do more than merely declare invalidity
• New Zealand – initially, only an interpretive mandate (interpret in light of bill of rights, even if it involves stretching the language, moving toward the possibility of declaration of invalidity
17
![Page 18: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
• Nothing yet on invalidating statutes that expressly override
• On the other side, some additional assertions of power to override in Canada
• Mostly in peculiar circumstances – overriding a lower court decision, overriding a decision dealing with a statutory regime that’s about to be replaced, to avoid transition disruptions
18
![Page 19: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• And sometimes political grandstanding – overriding a questionable lower court decision while also appealing to get it reversed
• Benefits have been more robust pre-enactment vetting, reducing the chance of facing a declaration of invalidity
19
![Page 20: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• But we haven’t yet seen the benefit of weak-form review as a means of provoking principled and reasoned rejection of judicial reasoning
• I’ll return to this in my concluding discussion
20
![Page 21: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Developments with respect to strong-form review
• The major development is the emergence of less-than-final decisions – “semi-strong”
• The clearest example is the spread of deferred remedies
• That is, the court finds a statute unconstitutional but doesn’t make its decision immediately enforceable
• It gives the legislature some time – six months to two years – to adopt a replacement
21
![Page 22: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• The court reserves the power to hold the replacement unconstitutional, so it’s not like weak-form review
• But rewriting the statute to accommodate the court’s objections is possible
• And, perhaps more important, the legislature can adopt minor revisions while leaving the core unchanged, even when the court’s objections went to the core
22
![Page 23: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
• The legislature can use this as an opportunity to encourage the court to reconsider its initial decision
• In light of greater information provided by the legislature in the re-enacting process, for example
• And, though this hasn’t happened yet to my knowledge, new judges might replace old ones and change the outcome
• Other developments were already present within strong-form review, but now can be seen in a somewhat different light
23
![Page 24: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Interpretation in light of the constitution, even where the interpretation is strained or inconsistent with traditional modes of interpretation
• Formally this allows the legislature to respond by enacting a “new” statute in the same words, insisting that they meant what they said, even though they now know that what they said might be unconstitutional
24
![Page 25: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
• Reading up or reading down – remedies for statutes that violate equality principles
• Reading up extends benefits to the excluded group, reading down limits benefits granted the included group
• Again, the legislature can respond by moving in the other direction – that is, if the court reads up, the legislature can deny benefits to all, and if the court reads down, the legislature can extend benefits to all
25
![Page 26: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Will conclude by discussing some normative issues associated with the distinction or the continuum
• Begin with something like the conditions for the development of weak-form review
• Strong tradition of parliamentary supremacy – no constitutional review at all
• Coupled with a perception that the existing system generated too many troubling examples of possible violations of fundamental rights
26
![Page 27: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Note that if there is no such perception, strong-form review might look a lot like parliamentary supremacy
• Because the strong-form court won’t be invalidating many statutes (roughly, the situation in Japan)
27
![Page 28: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
• Parliamentary supremacy reflects a strong commitment, at least in theory, to the proposition that the people should have complete power to determine the legal conditions of their life
• Any form of constitutional review will be in tension with that
• But the experience of troubling times makes enough people think that there ought to be some limits on parliamentary power
28
![Page 29: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• Yet, the tradition leads people to think that those limits should themselves be limited
• Weak-form review is a way of getting something like judicial input into the process without limiting parliamentary power “too much”
• In short, weak-form review is a way of accommodating democratic decision-making with a system of enforcing limits on majority power
29
![Page 30: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
• My own view is that this is a quite attractive institutional arrangement
• So why hasn’t it been more widely adopted?
• First, can’t rule out the possibility that the developments within strong-form review I’ve described – deferred remedies and the like – have been influenced by the normative attractiveness of weak-form review
30
![Page 31: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
• Though I wouldn’t emphasize that too much – those developments grew out of things that were present within strong-form systems even before the rise of weak-form review
31
![Page 32: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
• Second, there may be a sense that politicians can’t be trusted to respond appropriately to weak-form review
• Instead of overriding court decisions only when legislators disagree in principle with the court’s constitutional interpretations, legislators will override simply because they think that the legislation is a good thing even if unconstitutional
32
![Page 33: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
• So, strong-form review persists because of skepticism about the constitutional faithfulness of legislators
• That skepticism might well be justified
• This can be connected to the story I sketched about why a nation might adopt weak-form review
• Parliamentary supremacy coupled with recent experiences of abuses of power
33
![Page 34: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• What do you infer from those abuses?
• Advocates of weak-form review have to say that those abuses are exceptional actions by politicians who generally conform to constitutional norms
• But an alternative inference is that political norms have changed, or are in the process of changing
34
![Page 35: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
• The norm guiding politicians used to be “respect the constitution” but now is “get the votes you need however you can”
• So, though we might have trusted politicians in the past to do the right thing most of the time, the experiences that lead us to redesign the system are a symptom of a general transformation of political norms
35
![Page 36: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
• And the sensible response to that transformation is to move from parliamentary supremacy not to an intermediate position like weak-form review, but to the strong-form system that allows judges to displace political judgments that no longer are guided by a norm of adhering to the constitution
36
![Page 37: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
• My conclusion, then, is that those scholars who have focused on developments within strong-form review are on stronger normative ground that those who have defended weak-form review
37
![Page 38: Opening Remarks - 明治大学...Opening Remarks Prof. Hiroshi Ohtsu Meiji university 1 Strong and Weak Form Review Revisited –Meiji University 2019 Professor Mark V.Tushnet 2 •Traditionally](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022070819/5f18da57ec767f5a93583eb7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Closing RemarksA/Prof.Yuichiro Tsuji
Meiji university
38