Open Archives for Library and Information Science: an international experience Antonella de Robbio...
-
Upload
allyson-jordan -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of Open Archives for Library and Information Science: an international experience Antonella de Robbio...
Open Archives for Library and Information Science:
an international experience
Antonella de Robbio and Paula Sequeiros
IV EBIB Conference: Open Access - Internet in libraries 7th December 2007
Torun, Poland7th December 2007
2
underlying concepts
Open Access (OA) as the motivation
3
underlying concepts
Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of
scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible
4
underlying concepts
Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of
scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible
Trend towards digital libraries and self-archiving
5
E-LIS
e-prints in Library and Information Science
http://eprints.rclis.org
6
E-LIS• established in 2003
7
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant
8
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant• first international Open Archive for Library and
Information Science
9
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant• first international Open Archive for Library and
Information Science• a part of the RCLIS project
10
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant• first international Open Archive for Library and
Information Science• a part of the RCLIS project • international team of voluntary librarians
11
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant• first international Open Archive for Library and
Information Science• a part of the RCLIS project • international team of voluntary librarians• not-for-profit project
12
E-LIS• established in 2003• GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant• first international Open Archive for Library and
Information Science• a part of the RCLIS project • international team of voluntary librarians• not-for-profit project• freely accessible to users (search and full-text)
13
the archive: documents
6%
35%59%
preprints (6%)
postprints (35%)
unpublished (59%)
14
the archive: documents
articles (25%)200 journals
papers (9%)250 conferences
unpublished (59%)
other (7%)
25%
9%
59%
7%
15
the archive: documents
38%
62%
reviewed (62%)
16
growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)
17
growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)
18
what goes in and how
LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical
19
what goes in and how
LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical
• finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format
20
what goes in and how
LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical
• finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format
• authors self-archive
21
what goes in and how
LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical
• finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format
• authors self-archive
and• agreements with institutions and library
associations
22
submissions and authors
38%
62%
60% of submissions mediated by E-LIS editors
30% self-archived
2540 authors
23
24
25
26
value-added tools for editors and for users
• automatic alerts for editors
27
value-added tools for editors and for users
• automatic alerts for editors• full metadata display
28
value-added tools for editors and for users
• automatic alerts for editors• full metadata display• full-text search
29
value-added tools for editors and for users
• automatic alerts for editors• full metadata display• full-text search• counter in homepage
30
value-added tools for editors and for users
• automatic alerts for editors• full metadata display• full-text search• counter in homepage• statistics from Webalizer
31
value-added tools for editors and for users
reference linking with ParaTools
32
33
organisational model: E-LIS teams
initiative's strategic issues
34
organisational model: E-LIS teams
initiative's strategic issues• future direction
35
organisational model: E-LIS teams
initiative's strategic issues• future direction• policies and impact on the user
community
36
organisational model: E-LIS teams
initiative's strategic issues• future direction• policies and impact on the user
community• connection with other scientific
communities
37
organisational model: E-LIS administration
• archive’s international and future vision
38
organisational model: E-LIS administration
• archive’s international and future vision
• understanding of national and international needs
39
organisational model: E-LIS administration
• archive’s international and future vision
• understanding of national and international needs
• world framework of Open Access strategic issues
40
international & local
• 5 continents
41
international & local
• 5 continents• 42 countries
42
international & local
• 5 continents• 42 countries• common vision
43
international & local
• 5 continents• 42 countries• common vision
&• cultural individuality
44
international context
similar initiatives (LIS domain)
E-LIS
45
international context
similar initiatives (LIS domain)
E-LIS• clearly international
46
international context
similar initiatives (LIS domain)
E-LIS• clearly international• not commercially-driven (no external
funding; no profit)
47
international context
similar initiatives (LIS domain)
E-LIS• clearly international• not commercially-driven (no external
funding; no profit)• based on voluntary work
48
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
49
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
• mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
50
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
• mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
• submission policies: who can deposit and how
51
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
• mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
• submission policies: who can deposit and how
• metadata quality
52
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
• mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
• submission policies: who can deposit and how
• metadata quality• copyright policies
53
E-LIS policies
policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff
• mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved
• submission policies: who can deposit and how
• metadata quality• copyright policies• organisational model
54
copyright policies
RoMEO Project recommendations concerning the self-archiving of documents
Know your rights! of Project Romeo
www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/romeo/Know-your-rights.doc
55
copyright policies
• author retains property after depositauthors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution
pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission)
refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self-archiving
failing that, can append a link to published paper
56
copyright policies
• author retains property after deposit• authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution
pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission)
refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self-archiving
failing that, can append a link to published paper
57
copyright policies
• author retains property after deposit• authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution
• pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission)
refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self-archiving
failing that, can append a link to published paper
58
copyright policies
• author retains property after deposit• authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution
• pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission)
• refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self-archiving
failing that, can append a link to published paper
59
copyright policies
• author retains property after deposit• authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution
• pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission)
• refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self-archiving
• failing that, can link to published paper
60
organisational model
• over 60 editors– sharing a common vision– contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence
61
organisational model
• over 60 editors– sharing a common vision– contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence
• administration team
62
national metadata
undergoing debate - launching of a service provider to harvest and gather national metadata from national LIS archives which could become a part of the RCLIS infrastructure
63
E-LIS policies
preservation issues
preservation metadata - designed for identifying and managing digital content over a long period of time
64
preservation
JISC Circular 4/04, note 10no «formal preservation policy» was being followed
«de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions»
«strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
65
preservation
JISC Circular 4/04, note 10no «formal preservation policy» was being followed
«de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions»
«strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
66
preservation
JISC Circular 4/04, note 10no «formal preservation policy» was being followed
«de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions»
«strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»
67
preservation
PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices)
a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories
68
preservation
PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices)
a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories
offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/
69
preservation
PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices)
a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories
offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/
E-LIS responded to survey and «is working to allow for a Preserv profile within ROAR
70
preservation
PRONOM-DROID
The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software
file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester
graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface
71
preservation
PRONOM-DROID
The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software
file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester
• graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface
72
preservation
OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories
http://www.opendoar.org/
73
preservation
OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories
http://www.opendoar.org/• tool that supports preservation policy
74
preservation
OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories
http://www.opendoar.org/• tool that supports preservation policy • preservation policy definition form allows
for external partnerships
75
preservation
GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects
76
preservation
GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a
document
77
preservation
GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a
document preserves rights declarations
78
preservation
E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007)
(then a) total of 5077 records
79
preservation
E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007)
(then a) total of 5077 records 86% were found to be PDF/MS-Word
80
preservation
August 2007, E-LISproject DRAMBORA (Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment)
81
preservation
purpose of the DRAMBORA toolkit
[…] identifying the risks and vulnerabilities
associated with the mandate, activities and assets
assessing and calculating the risks defining risk management measures
[…]
82
preservation
results of auditing:
E-LIS needs to improve at technical management level, while at content level it showed to be well-prepared
83
conclusions
1. LIS computing science and
technology - bibliometric and citation analysis
an interesting reference case to other communities
84
conclusions
2. diversification of nationalities and languages– 82 countries – 36 languages
85
conclusions
2. diversification of nationalities and languages
intensive collaboration from Polish librarians:
86
conclusions
2. diversification of nationalities and languages
intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS
87
conclusions
2. diversification of nationalities and languages
intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS– very high bibliometric skills
88
conclusions
2. diversification of nationalities and languages
intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS– very high bibliometric skills– excellent editors Bozena
Bednarek-Michalska and Lidia Derfert-Wolf
89
conclusions
3. international LIS network
stimulated by – extension of OA concept to LIS
90
conclusions
3. international LIS network
stimulated by – extension of OA concept to LIS
facilitated by – dissemination of material within the
community
91
conclusions
4. E-LIS contributing to outline
global vision of LIS domain
challenges and opportunities
motivation to engage in such a venture
and to further develop international
research activities
92
conclusions
4. E-LIS contributing to outline
global vision of LIS domain
challenges and opportunities
motivation to engage in such a venture
and to further develop international
research activities
93
conclusions
4. E-LIS contributing to outline
global vision of LIS domain
challenges and opportunities
motivation to engage and to further
develop international
research activities