Online engagement

24
Online engagement Priscilla Brice- Weller April 2007

description

A top-level analysis of how not-for-profit organisations can determine which Web 2.0 tools to use for maximum engagement online. This will also cover whether the amount of effort an organisation puts into these tools will achieve the required effect.

Transcript of Online engagement

Page 1: Online engagement

Online engagement

Priscilla Brice-WellerApril 2007

Page 2: Online engagement

Online campaigning: antar.org.au

Blog: solidariti.com

Page 3: Online engagement

1 1

Page 4: Online engagement
Page 5: Online engagement

public

diariesphoto albums

correspondencecalendars

address books

private

online offline“Web 2.0”

Page 6: Online engagement

Web 2.0 : user-generated– Digg : vote for top stories– Blogs & YouTube : community journalism and

commenting– Flickr : everyone’s a photographer– MySpace : everyone’s your friend– Twitter : your thoughts for the world to see– Facebook : tell everyone who your business

contacts are

etc, etc, etc …

Page 7: Online engagement

Too much Web 2.0?(www.go2web20.net)

Page 8: Online engagement

At what stage will people be engaged by the use of these Web 2.0 tools?

sympathisers activists

Simple actions:Web 2.0 engagement (previous chart)

Professional

activists

Activemembers: attending meetings, becoming passionate

Sympathisers will start using Web 2.0 tools to engage with yourcause early on, and continue using them through to the activist stage.

Easy actions:writing blogposts about issues, emailing a politician

Advocates: engaging other people

Specific, tangible actions: donating,volunteering, downloading and using online materials offline

Page 9: Online engagement
Page 10: Online engagement

each tool requires significant resources

not-for-profit orgs need:• to be strategic about which tools they use• a range of tools that, collectively, helps them

reach the target audience• to question for each tool “does effort = effect?”

Page 11: Online engagement
Page 12: Online engagement

Good example – MySpace Join (RED): myspace.com/joinred• Connect to a new community• Tell “friends” your latest news • Ask people to take action, donate, volunteer• Use the blog

Page 13: Online engagement

myspace.com/nonprofitorganizations:

The first 5,000 friends took 5 months and 25 days to achieve. The second 5,000 friends only took 2 months and 5 days.

myspace.com/ant4r:

After about three months, we have about 200 friends.

MySpace friends

Page 14: Online engagement

MySpace age demographic

Total audience, August 2006

Age % of audience

12-17 11.9%

18-24 18.1%

25-34 16.7%

35-54 40.6%

55 + 11.0%Source: http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1019

Page 15: Online engagement

Good example – demographic website

Page 16: Online engagement

Good example – Corporate site

Movember: movember.com• Target audience• Professional site =

credibility• Up-to-date• Fun stuff: templates for

posters, tshirts, stencils, stickers, removable tattoos

• Keep backups!

Page 17: Online engagement
Page 18: Online engagement

Good example – blogs (+ Technorati): • joinred.blogspot.com

• oxfam.org.uk/generationwhy/blog/

Page 19: Online engagement

Good examples: email newsletters

Subscribe to other organisations’ newsletters to see how they do it• WWF Futuremakers

• Oxfam Great Britain’s “Generation Why”

• Amnesty & Greenpeace’s campaign newsletters

• See Campaign Monitor for good corporate examples

• Keep branding consistent• Keep database up-to-date• Keep content to-the-point

Page 20: Online engagement

Two good examples: maps www.hopespreads.org

Page 21: Online engagement

Two good examples: maps www.healthcarethatworks.org

Page 22: Online engagement

Good example: bespokeSea of Hands: seaofhands.antar.org.au

• Personalise

• Community

• Take action

• Funding + expertise

Also see: futuremakers.com.au, freerangegraphics.com, gamesforchange.org, habbo.com, secondlife.com

Page 23: Online engagement

consistent branding and message

Page 24: Online engagement

The future?