On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

26
On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework Royce Kimmons University of Texas at Austin

Transcript of On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Page 1: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Royce KimmonsUniversity of Texas at Austin

Page 2: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

TPACK Model

Page 3: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Difficulties & Limitations of TPACK for Assessment and Evaluation

1. Fuzziness2. Techno-centrism3. Misapplication of the model

Page 4: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

[1] Fuzziness

Page 5: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Evaluating for Fuzziness

• “I can teach lessons that appropriately combine literacy, technologies, and teaching approaches[;]”

• “I can teach lessons that appropriately combine science, technologies, and teaching approaches[;] [...]”

• “I can provide leadership in helping others to coordinate the use of content, technologies, and teaching approaches at my school and/or district” (Schmidt, Baran, Thompson, Mishra, Koehler, & Shin, 2009; emphasis added)

Page 6: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

[2] Techno-centrism

• Can you have TPACK without T?• Is T always appropriate?• Where are the students in all of this?

Learning?• How does T change the teaching?– R – Replacement– A – Amplification– T – Transformation (Hughes et al., 2006)

Page 7: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

[3] Misapplication of the Model

Page 8: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Venn Diagrams as Logical ModelsR + W = WR

TautologicalSufficient & Necessary Causes

Page 9: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Venn Diagrams as Illustrative Models

A + S = ?Non-Tautological

Merely Necessary Cause

If No A or No S = No PBP

Page 10: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Various Relationships

Page 11: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

How do we use PCK & TPACK?Logical ModelTautological

IllustrationNon-Tautologicalvs.

Sufficient & Necessary Cause

Necessary Cause

Page 12: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

PCK as an Illustration

Page 13: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Can PCK be a Logical Model?

Page 14: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Recap

1. Theoretical Models like Venn Diagrams may be used in a Tautological (Logical or Sufficient & Necessary) or a Non-Tautological (Illustrative or Merely Necessary) manner

2. A single diagram may be used in one or both ways if it shows multiple relationships; TPACK includes both types of relationships

Page 15: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

TPACK Model

Page 16: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Logical Conversion: Overcomplication

Page 17: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

TPACK Model

Page 18: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Assessing for TPACK

Page 19: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Assessing for TPACK

Page 20: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Misapplication: Type 1

Page 21: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Misapplication: Type 2

Page 22: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Solution: Assess for the Hybrid Domains

Page 23: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

What’s Missing in Ed Tech?

Page 24: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Surest Method for Assessing for and Implementing TPACK

Page 25: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Is this a Reasonable Approach?

• Logically implies TPACK• Less fuzzy than attempting to assess for and

implement TPACK directly• Does not sacrifice any inherent complexity of

TPACK

• Is this an unnecessary complication?• Should we even be assessing for TPACK at all?

Page 26: On the Reasonableness of TPACK as an Implementation and Evaluation Framework

Questions? Thoughts?

Royce KimmonsTwitter: http://twitter.com/roycekimmonsEmail: [email protected]