OKPARA, MORGAN OBINNAs Project Corrected... · than subsequent eggs laid in a clutch, while the...
Transcript of OKPARA, MORGAN OBINNAs Project Corrected... · than subsequent eggs laid in a clutch, while the...
1
OKPARA, MORGAN OBINNA
LAYING AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SHAVER BROWN
AND NERA BLACK HENS IN HOT HUMID ENVIRONMENT
FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE,
kkdkjd
NWANKWO ONYEKACHI.A.
2
TITLE PAGE
LAYING AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF SHAVER BROWN AND
NERA BLACK HENS IN HOT HUMID ENVIRONMENT
BY
OKPARA, MORGAN OBINNA
PG/MSc/09/50547
A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE,
FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE IN FUFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT
FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DEGREE OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA.
AUGUST, 2012
3
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the work embodied in this project report for the degree
of Master of Science of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka was carried out by Mr.
Okpara, Morgan Obinna at the Poultry Farm of the Animal Science Department of
this University. The work presented herein is original and has not been submitted
in part or full for any other degree of this or any other university
……………………………………….. …………………………
DR. A.O. ANI Date
Project Supervisor
……………………………………….. ………………………...
DR. A.E. ONYIMONYI (Esq.) JP Date
Head of Department
……………………………………….. …………………………
EXTERNAL EXAMINER Date
4
DEDICATION
This work is dedicated to my beloved family and to God Almighty, our Father in
heaven.
5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I wish to sincerely record in the pages of history the unalloyed cooperation I
received from my research supervisor Dr. A.O. Ani. He sponsored the research and
provided a fertile ground for the successful completion of the work.
I am grateful to the Head of Animal Science Department, Dr. A.E.
Onyimonyi. I would also like to express my profound gratitude to Professor A.G.
Ezekwe, Professor S.O.C. Ugwu, Dr. N.S. Machebe, Dr. (Mrs) H.M. Ndofor-
Foleng, Miss N.C.P. Uberu and Mr. C.O. Osita. I thank Dr. C.C. Ogbu for his
assistance in the statistical analysis of the data and for his invaluable contribution
during and after the research work.
I thank Dr. E.C. Akanno of the Center for Genetic improvement of
Livestock, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph,
Ontario Canada, for his contribution towards my academic and mental
emancipation during the study.
The Farm Manager, Mr. S.C. Chime provided a very conducive environment
on the farm for my study to sail through.
My thanks are due to Mr. Mark Nnamani for assisting and guiding me
during the study.
Finally, I thank the Almighty GOD for His grace and blessings without
which this programme would have been impossible. To Him I say “Thus Far the
Lord has helped me”. Many thanks to all and may GOD bless all of you.
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. i
Certification .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ii
Dedication .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iii
Acknowledgement .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iv
Table of contents .. .. .. .. .. .. .. v
List of Tables .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. viii
List of figures .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ix
Abstract .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. x
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
1.1 Background .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1
1.2 Statement of problem .. .. .. .. .. 3
1.3 Objectives of study .. .. .. .. .. 3
1.4 Justification of study .. .. .. .. .. 4
CHAPTER TWO
Literature Review
2.1 Classification of chickens .. .. .. .. .. 5
2.2 Exotic breed of laying birds .. .. .. .. .. 5
2.3 The reproductive system of the laying hen .. .. 6
2.3.1 The Ovary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7
2.3.2 The Oviduct .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8
2.3.3 Ovulation .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9
2.3.4 Egg formation .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 12
2.4 Oviposition .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 12
2.4.1 Sequential laying .. .. .. .. .. .. 13
2.4.2 Sequence/Clutch length .. .. .. .. .. .. 15
2.4.3 Pause days .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15
2.4.4 Ovpiosition time .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 16
2.4.5 Time interval between successive eggs and lag .. .. 16
2.4.6 Total egg production .. .. .. .. .. .. 17
2.4.7 Rate/Intensity of lay .. .. .. .. .. .. 17
2.5 Egg quality .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 18
2.5.1 Egg weight .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 19
2.6 Physical characteristics of hens .. .. .. .. 19
2.7 Climatic condition .. .. .. .. .. .. 21
7
CHAPTER THREE
Materials and Methods
3.1 Location and duration of study .. .. .. .. .. 23
3.2 Experimental birds .. .. .. .. .. .. 25
3.3 Management of hens .. .. .. .. .. .. 25
3.4 Parameters measured .. .. .. .. .. 25
3.4.1 Oviposition time .. .. .. .. .. .. 25
3.4.2 Total egg production .. .. .. .. 25
3.4.3 Clucth/sequence length .. .. .. .. .. 26
3.4.4 Pause days .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26
3.4.5 Egg weight .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26
3.4.6 Egg quality .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 26
3.4.7 Average daily feed intake .. .. .. 27
3.4.8 Percentage egg production .. .. .. 27
3.5 Physical characteristics .. .. .. .. .. .. 27
3.6 Temperature .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 28
3.7 Experimental design .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
3.8 Statistical analysis .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 28
CHAPTER FOUR
Results and discussion
4.1 Results
4.1.1 Egg laying characteristics of Shaver brown hens .. 29
4.1.1.1 Oviposition time .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 29
4.1.1.2 Total egg production .. .. .. .. .. .. 31
4.1.1.3 Clutch length .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 31
4.1.1.4 Pause days .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 37
4.1.1.5 Egg weight .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 37
4.1.1.6 Intensity/ Rate of lay .. .. .. .. .. .. 37
4.1.1.7 Hen housed egg production (HHEP) .. .. .. .. 39
4.1.1.8 Hen day egg production (HDEP) .. .. .. .. 39
4.1.2 Egg laying characteristics of Nera black hens .. .. 41
4.1.2.1 Oviposition time .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 41
4.1.2.2 Total egg production .. .. .. .. .. .. 43
4.1.2.3 Clutch length .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 43
4.1.2.4 Pause days .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 50
4.1.2.5 Egg weight .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 50
4.1.2.6 Intensity/ Rate of lay .. .. .. .. .. 50
4.1.2.7 Hen housed egg production (HHEP) .. .. .. 51
4.1.2.8 Hen day egg production (HDEP) .. .. .. 51
8
4.1.3 Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown
and Nera black hens .. .. .. .. .. .. 55
4.1.4 Interaction of strain and temperature on Performance .. 57
4.1.5 Physical characteristics of hens .. .. .. .. 57
4.1.6 Comparison between strains for performance and egg
quality traits .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 58
4.2 Discussion
4.2.1 Climatic data for Nsukka .. .. .. .. .. .. 60
4.2.2.1 Egg laying characteristics of Shaver brown
and Nera black hens .. .. .. .. .. 60
4.2.2.1 Oviposition time .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 60
4.2.2.2 Total egg production and other egg productionIndices .. 61
4.2.2.3 Clutch length .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 61
4.2.2.4 Pause days .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 62
4.2.2.5 Egg weight .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 62
4.2.3 Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver
brown and Nera black hens .. .. .. .. 63
4.2.4 Interaction of strain and temperature on performance .. 65
4.2.5 Physical characteristics .. .. .. .. .. .. 67
4.2.6 Comparison between strains for performance and egg
quality traits.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 69
CHAPTER FIVE
Summary and conclusion .. .. .. .. .. .. 71
References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 72
Appendices .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 81
9
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Times of egg laying in hens .. .. .. .. .. .. 14
Table 2: Mean weekly environmental temperatures and relative humidity during
the period of the study.. .. .. .. .. .. .. 24
Table 3: Frequency distribution of egg production of Shaver brown hens .. 30
Table 4: Frequency distribution of mean clutch length of Shaver brown hens 32
Table 5: Effect of egg position and clutch size on egg weight of Shaver brown hens 33
Table 6: Frequency distribution of pause days of Shaver brown hens 34
Table 7: Effect of oviposition interval on egg weight of Shaver brown hens.. 36
Table 8: Frequency distribution of egg laying of Shaver brown and Nera
black hens during the day .. .. .. .. .. .. 38
Table 9: Classification of experimental hens .. .. .. .. .. 40
Table 10: Frequency distribution of egg production of Nera black hens .. 42
Table 11: Frequency distribution of mean clutch length of Nera black hens .. 44
Table 12: Effect of egg position and clutch size on egg weight of Nera black hens 45
Table 13: Frequency distribution of pause days of Nera black hens .. .. 46
Table 14: Effect of oviposition interval on egg weight of Nera black hens .. 49
Table 15: Comparison between strains for performance and egg quality traits 52
Table 16: Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown hens .. 63
Table 17: Effect of temperature on performance of Nera black hens 54
Table 18: Effect of interaction of strain and temperature on performance 56
10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Frequency distribution of egg laying of Shaver brown hens
at different oviposition intervals during the day .. .. 35
Figure 2: Frequency distribution of egg laying of Nera black hens
at different oviposition intervals during the day .. .. 47
Figure 3: Average weekly temperatures (Indoor and Outdoor) and relative
humidity of the study area .. .. .. .. .. 48
11
ABSTRACT
A total of one hundred and fifty Shaver brown and Nera black hens in their 14th
week of lay were
used in a study conducted to determine the laying and physical characteristics of Shaver brown
and Nera black hens under humid tropical environment. Hens were housed individually in
separate cages. The hens were supplied water ad libitum and fed layers mash containing 16.5%
crude protein and 2650 kcal/kg of metabolizable energy for 10 weeks. The hens were also
divided into three classes based on their laying performance as follows: good layers, intermediate
layers and poor layers and their physical conditions appraised. Temperature readings were taken
3-hourly at time intervals of 0900h, 1200h, 1500h, and 1800h using a standard air thermometer
and the mean daily temperatures noted. The climatic data taken during the period of the
experiment showed that the study area had the natural day-length of 13 to 14 hours; mean
maximum weekly indoor and outdoor temperatures of 27.90C to 29.2
0C and 26.8
0C to 30.5
0C,
respectively; mean minimum weekly indoor and outdoor temperatures of 20.50C to 22.3
0C and
20.00C to 23.60
0C, respectively; relative humidity of 73.1% to 76.6% and mean total monthly
rainfall of 781.33mm. Results showed that the peak of lay was between 0700h and 0800h and
declined gradually throughout late afternoon hours until no egg was laid between 1700h and
1800h. For Shaver brown hens, about 86.24% and 13.76% of the eggs were laid in the morning
and afternoon hours respectively, while 88.75% and 11.25% of the eggs were laid in the morning
and afternoon hours respectively, for Nera black hens. Mean egg weight of 70.05g±1.07 and
70.10g±0.92 for eggs laid between 0600h and 0700h for Shaver brown and Nera black hens,
respectively were the heaviest (P<0.05) of all the mean egg weights observed in all oviposition
intervals. For Shaver brown hens, first eggs laid in a clutch were significantly greater (P<0.05)
than subsequent eggs laid in a clutch, while the first eggs in a clutch for Nera black were greater
than other eggs in the clutch, although the differences were not significant (P>0.05). Hens with
the longest clutches and shortest number of pause days produced the greatest number of eggs.
The total number of pause days observed were 1410 and 1329 for Shaver brown and Nera black
hens, respectively. Observations made on physical characteristics of the hens revealed that good
layers had smooth combs and wattles, moist and enlarged vents with flexible pubic bone, soft
abdomen and worn out feathers. Intermediate layers had similar features with good layers except
that the eye rings, beaks and shanks were slightly bleached. Poor layers had dry combs and
wattles, tight and hard abdomen and closed pubic bones. The Effect of ambient temperature on
performance parameters showed that for Shaver brown hens, hen day egg production, average
daily feed intake, egg shell weight, egg shape index, albumin height, yolk height, yolk height and
Haugh units were significantly reduced (P<0.05) with increasing temperatures. All performance
parameters measured for Nera black hens were significantly reduced (P<0.05) with increasing
temperatures. Likewise, there was significant interaction (P<0.05) of strain and temperature on
average daily feed intake and yolk height. The results of the present study indicate that although
heat stress had effect on performance, Shaver brown and Nera black hens are adapted to humid
tropical environment and can lay 86.24% and 88.75% eggs, respectively in the morning hours,
with overall production rate of 66.43% and 68.36% respectively, for Shaver brown and Nera
black hens.
12
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
The growth in global demand for poultry products is tremendous as the market for these products
is growing very fast. Poultry is probably the fastest route to achieve any appreciable
improvement in the nutritional standard of the populace because of its short generation interval,
quick turnover rate and relatively low capital investment (Smith, 2001; Ani and Okeke, 2011).
Gueye (2000) asserted that 85% of rural households in Sub-Saharan Africa keep chickens or
other types of poultry. Poultry are equally important to other smallholders in Asia, Latin America
and other parts of the world (Mallia, 1999; FAO, 2003; Islam and Jabbar, 2005; Kyrsgarrd,
2007). Increased egg production is one sure way of achieving the target of providing quality
animal protein at a minimum cost to the consumers (Oluyemi and Roberts, 2000). Advances in
genetic selection make today’s commercial layers quite different from those of years ago. Body
weight is less, age at housing is earlier, total egg number has increased, egg mass is greater and
feed conversion has improved considerably (Miles and Jacob, 2000; Minivielle et al., 2006).
Total egg production is affected both by the physical and laying characteristics of the hen.
Laying characteristics of hens have been assessed by evaluating such indices as rate of lay,
oviposition time, clutch/sequence length, number of pause days, lag time, hen housed egg
production (HHEP), and hen day egg production (HDEP).
Physical characteristics of laying hens on the other hand, consist of those features that can be
seen easily on their body such as condition of combs, wattles, eyes, beaks, pubic bones, abdomen
and vent. They are used to determine whether a hen is laying or not (Gillespie, 1997; Reddy et
al., 2004; Daghir, 2008; Ani and Nnamani, 2011).
Apart from egg laying characteristics which are cyclic and genetically influenced, egg
production is affected by nutrition, variations in temperature, light intensity, day- length, relative
humidity, disease and level of management. Hens lay sequentially (Wolford et al., 1997;
Spradbrow, 1997; Gillespie, 1997; Miles and Jacob, 2000; Smith, 2003; Van Der Molen, 2004;
Jakowski and Kaufman, 2004; Reddy et al., 2004; Clauer, 2005; Poultryhelp, 2005). Hens vary
in their laying habits. The number of eggs in a sequence varies between one to forty and
13
occasionally even more. Even if flock uniformity is high, not all hens in the flock lay at the same
rate. While some hens may be laying at a very high rate of production, others may not even be
laying at all (Miles and Jacob, 2000; Ani and Nnamani, 2011). The longer the clutch length, the
more eggs a hen lays in a given period (Etches, 1996; Reddy et al., 2004; Jakowski and
Kaufman, 2004 ). According to Butcher and Miles (2000), the exotic hen is capable of laying
240-270 eggs per annum, each weighing about 58 grammes under tropical condition. The
success of birds as a class is largely due to the fact that they have evolved physiological
mechanisms that cause them to lay eggs at a time of season, when such factors as weather and
food supply are optimal (Koelkebeck, 2001). According to Daghir (2008), humid environment is
very suitable for poultry production. Although all livestock are subject to environmental stress in
the tropics, poultry appears to be less susceptible than mammals. One reason may be that with
higher body temperature than mammals, birds spend less production energy than other livestock
in homeostatic regulations (adjustments). Under suitable tropical housing and management
practices, poultry performance in the tropics has in many instances compared favourably with the
performance standards of the same breeds reared in temperate environments. In acclimatizing to
hot climate, animals normally make physiological adjustments (Hahn et al., 2003). As the
seasons change, two major kinds of changes occur in the environments: changes in temperature
and changes in length of daylight. Hormones enable the animal to respond physiologically to
these seasonal changes (Hahn et al., 2003). The pineal body in chicken’s brain controls its body
temperature and its sense of environmental temperature. Normal body temperature lies between
39.80C and 43.6
0C being at its highest around 1600h and its lowest around midnight (Hahn et al.,
2003; Daghir, 2008). Egg production is intimately linked with daylight hours. The light rays
received through the eyes affect the pituitary gland, which releases hormone into the bloodstream
thus stimulating the ovaries into action. As the day-length hours shorten, egg production
correspondingly decreases. By midwinter in temperate environment, it is usually nonexistent. To
ensure continued production, hens in temperate regions must have a minimum of 16 hours of
light per day. As the hours of natural day-length decreases, artificial lighting can be gradually
introduced for longer periods to make up the difference (Clauer, 2005; Hanson, 2005).
Environmental condition of the area in which the hens are laying affects their sequence length.
1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
14
Advances in genetic selection make today’s commercial layers quite different from those of
years ago. Body weight is less, age at housing is earlier, total egg number has increased, egg
mass is greater and feed conversion ratio has improved considerably (Miles and Jacob, 2000;
Minivielle et al., 2006). Although management and feeding practices are the key determining
factors of egg production, the breed of laying hen affects egg production. The rate of adaptation
and quality of egg production of different exotic breeds of hen vary when exposed to a variety of
climate and environments. According to Miles and Jacob (2000), some hens may be laying at a
very high production rate while others may not be laying at all. The climatic conditions of
Nsukka in particular and those of South Eastern Nigeria in general depict a typical tropical
climate (Egbunike, 2002). Findings by Okonkwo and Akubuo (2007) have revealed an average
annual minimum and maximum temperature ranges of 220C
- 24.7
0C and 33
0C -37
oC,
respectively. These ranges appear to fall outside the zone of thermo neutrality of laying hens
which is 180C
- 22
oC as recently defined by Imik et al. (2009). As such, adverse effects of heat
stress are suspected to clasp egg production parameters of laying hens in the tropics. Most
African diets (including Nigerian) are deficient in animal protein which results in poor and
stunted growth as well as increase in spread of diseases and consequently death (Apantaku et al.,
2003). Apart from low egg production and poor performing breeds, other problems associated
with poultry production in Nigeria are diseases and pests, poor weight gain/feed conversion,
feeding and management problems and lack of capital (Eekeren et al.,1995; Isiaka 1998;
Apantaku et al., 2003). Moreover, the environment to which poultry birds are exposed affect
performance of the birds (Abeke et al., 1998; Isiaka, 1998). The optimal laying temperature is
between 18-220C (Imik et al., 2009), while a relative humidity above 75 percent will cause a
reduction in egg laying (Hahn et al., 2003). When the temperature rises above 280C
, the
production and quality of eggs decrease as seasonal temperature increase can reduce egg
production by 10 percent (Oluyemi and Roberts, 2000; Smith, 2001). Lastly, egg
production clearly requires planning for costs as well as for profit generation and for meeting
market demand without which a commercial egg production venture may suffer serious setbacks.
1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The study was aimed at evaluating the laying and physical characteristics of Shaver brown
and Nera black hens in hot humid environment.
15
The specific objectives of the study were as follows:
1. To determine the oviposition time, and clutch size of Shaver brown and Nera black hens
in hot humid environment.
2. To determine position of eggs in a clutch and their relationship to egg weight in hot
humid environment.
3. To determine the comparative performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens in hot
humid environment.
4. To establish the relationship between performance and environmental temperature.
16
1.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY
With the increasing importation and utilization of exotic hybrids in commercial egg production
in Nigeria, it is imperative to study the egg laying characteristics of these birds under the local
condition. Information obtained would help assess the level of adaptability of Shaver brown
and Nera black hens to humid tropical environment. Knowledge of laying distribution is
necessary in recommending frequency of egg collection to management and poultry farmers.
More eggs crack if they are not collected at frequent intervals. When buying birds at the point
of lay, a careful observation of the physical features will enable a farmer to choose or buy only
birds that have the potential of good layers. The ultimate objective of the poultry farmer is the
realization of profit, and in order to do this, he must understand the interactions between body
conformation, body function and environment. In the tropical context, environment (mainly
temperature and humidity) plays a very important role as it imposes extra stress in the ability of
the chicken to grow and function optimally. Solutions to the problems bedeviling poultry
production in Nigeria depend mostly on research and this requires effective research approach
to make meaningful impact on poultry productivity. At this juncture therefore, conducting
research on the laying and physical characteristics of two strains of exotic breed of hen has
become imperative so as to obtain information that would help in assessing their level of
adaptability to humid tropical environment and also, to establish proven production basis
which will determine their suitability and adaptability for massive commercial and small scale
egg productions.
17
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 CLASSIFICATION OF CHICKEN
There are approximately 175 varieties of chickens grouped into 12 classes and
approximately 60 breeds (Daghir, 2008; Obioha, 1992). A class is a group of breeds
originating in the same geographical area. The names themselves – Asiatic, American,
Mediterranean, indicate the region where the breeds originated.
Breed means a group which possesses a given set of physical features, such as body
shape, skin colour, carriage or station, and number of toes.
Variety is a category of breed and is based on feather colour, comb or presence of beard
or muff. Thus the Plymouth Rock may be Barred, White, Buff or one of other several colours.
The Rhode Island Red may be either a single or rose comb. In each case, the body shape and
physical features should be identical. Breed and Variety tell little about the qualities of good
producing stock. Strain however, does. A strain is a group of breeding population within a
variety or cross that has been bred and developed to possess certain desirable characteristics.
Many commercial strains exist such as Babcock, Dekalb, Hyline, and Shaver that have been
bred for specific purposes mainly for egg production (Daghir, 2008).
2.2 Exotic breeds of laying birds
The first exotic chickens to be imported into Nigeria probably came around the early
fifties but their full commercial potential was not realized until the late fift ies after their
successful adaptation and performance.
The earliest breeds which were imported then included Rhode Island Red, Barred
Plymouth Rock, New Hampshire and White Leghorn. Although these came as straight breeds,
their ancestors were composite of different blood lines which had been developed in the native
or adapted countries from several generations of crosses. Subsequent importation included
several hybrids developed from inbred lines and cross-breeding processes aimed at developing
strains for growth or egg production.
The more common hybrids in tropical Africa today according to Daghir (2008) and Obioha
(1992) include:
A UNITED STATES
1 Hyline / B 11
18
2 Hyline 935
3 Harco (Obioha, 1992)
4 Babcock 300
5 Babcock 380
B UNITED KINGDOM
1. Rangers/Sykes
2. Thornbers 808
3. Thornbers 909
C FRANCE
1. Warren Sex-Linked
D CANADA
1. Shaver Star Cross
2. Shaver Star Cross 444T
3. Brown Eggs Shaver 579 ( intensive and alternative)
E ISRAEL
1 Yarkon
2 Yaafa
3 Kabir (Obioha, 1992).
These Layers have variable performance capabilities, and because of the rapid genetic
turnover by breeders, new strains appear in the market practically everyday (Obioha, 1992).
The best chicken breeds include commercial white-type hybrids, which produce white-shelled
eggs and are the most economical feed to egg converter.
Commercial red plumage coloured birds (e.g. Rhode Island Reds, New Hampshire) or
sex linked hybrids produce large, brown-shelled eggs. These birds have meaty carcasses and
produce a good supply of eggs. The hybrids that lay more eggs tend to be docile than those that
lay white eggs. All poultry breeds lay eggs, but they are not equally efficient (Clauer, 2005).
2.3 The Reproductive System Of Hen
There are two main parts of the reproductive system of hen: the ovary and the oviduct.
Only the left ovary and the oviduct develop in a bird (Imai, 2003; Pineda and Dooley, 2003).
Pesek (1999) noted that right ovary regressed probably as an adaptive mechanism to
reduce weight necessary to aid flight. The ovary is attached underneath the backbone, about
midway between the neck and tail. When a female chick is hatched, the ovary begins to
19
convert ova to egg yolks at the appropriate time. For this to happen, the pullet (young female
chicken) must have reached the correct stage of physical development. Then if the appropriate
light stimulation is present, hormones cause ova to develop in sequence to yolks.
Yolks are released from the ovary into the body cavity when they reach the correct size
(Smith, 1998). The ovulated yolk is retrieved by the infindubulum, the first part of the oviduct.
Completion of the egg will require approximately 24 or more hours. Passage through the
magnum, isthmus and uterus of the oviduct results in the addition of egg white, shell
membrane and shell.
Soon after an egg is laid (oviposition), the process starts again. Another yolk is
released, and the next egg formed. Some chicken and ducks can lay an egg everyday for more
than 300 consecutive days. Other birds, may lay only a few eggs, yet others may lay only every
second day (Smith, 1998).
2.3.1 The Ovary
The ovary is located in the body (abdominal cavity), ventral to the aorta, posterior to
the vena cava, and cranial to the kidney. At hatch, the ovary of a chick contains many
thousands of follicles (oocytes) each of which has the potential to become the yolk of an egg.
Given the opportunity, hens from highly selected strains may lay 2000-3000 eggs during their
life expectancy of 7-10 years (Zakaria, 2001; Etches, 1996).
At the time of sexual maturity, (18 to 20 weeks of age), 4 to 6 oocytes increase in
diameter and the follicular hierarchy begins to be established. During subsequent ovulation
cycle, only the largest follicle will ovulate followed in successive days by the 2nd
, 3rd
, 4th
largest ones, each of which enlarges to assume the size of the ovulated predecessor (Etches,
1996). Cassey et al. (2004) noted that in hens, the ovarian follicles committed to ovulation are
arranged in an orderly follicular hierarchy. The ovary of the mature hen contains a hierarchy of
yellow yolky follicles and several thousand smaller follicles from which the large yolk follicles
are recruited.
Esminger (1991) observed that at the time of hatching, the female chick’s left ovary
contains approximately 3,600 to 4,000 tiny ova from which fully-sized yolks may develop
when the hen matures. Austic and Nesheim (1990) reported that the ovary of a hen contains 5
to 6 large yellow developing yolks (follicles) and a large number of small large number of
small white follicles which represent immature underdeveloped yolks. Each of the follicles
contains an oocyte and it is attached to the ovary by a slender stalk called the stigma.
20
In the hierachy, Zakaria (2001) explained that sizes range from microscopic to size of
the follicle that is destined to ovulate next. This follicle weighs about 15g; the next member of
this size hierarchy weighs about 12g and the third about 10g. Below these sizes, there may be
several follicles less than 1mg, and eventually down to a multitude of follicles of microscopic
size. Only a follicle reaches ovulatory size each day. After ovulation of the longest follicle, the
smaller follicles move up one notch size and re-establish the hierarchy as it existed just before
ovulation.
Zakaria (2001) also threw some light into mechanisms involved in establishing and
maintaining follicular size hierarchy for prolonged period of time. He indicated that the hen
must be able to distribute hypophyseal hormones circulation in the bloodstream in such a way
that some follicles get a larger quantity of formed ones, so that they can grow faster and
become large, and other follicles receive a small quantity. The net result of the rationing
system is that they establish and maintain a follicular size hierarchy in which the position of
the individual follicle is determined by the amount of hormone stimulating it.
According to Etches (1996), most follicles therefore never ovulate, but it would appear
that most participate in the production of steroid hormones from the ovary. At an early stage of
follicular development that has not yet been identified, the small ovarian follicles begin to
produce oestrogen. As sexual maturity approaches, the production of these hormones
stimulates deposition of calcium in the medullary bone, development of yolk precursors by the
liver, development of the reproductive tract and development of other secondary
characteristics. These secondary characteristics include the comb, spurs, softening and
spreading of pubic bones and deposition of pigments in the beak, the shanks and around the
vent. Each of these secondary sexual characteristics can be, and is used to indicate both the
onset and maintenance of lay.
2.3.2 The Oviduct
An intimate anatomic relationship exists between the ovary and oviduct. The term
oviduct is used to describe the complete tubular genitalia of the hen. It is large, convoluted
tube occupying a large part of the abdominal cavity. It weighs about 60g in sexually mature
chicken and extends from ovary to cloaca (Zakaria, 2001). It has good blood supply and
muscular walls that are in nearly continuous movement during the time egg formation is
taking place. The oviduct is about 50-75cm long (Zakaria, 2001; Esminger, 1991). Austin and
Neshein (1990) noted that large variations occur in the size of the oviduct depending on the
21
stage of the reproductive cycle. The size changes are dependent upon the levels of the
gonadtrophic hormones being secreted by anterior pituitary and oestrogen production in the
ovary. The oviduct is divided into five clearly defined functional regions. Starting from the
ovarian end, they are infundubulum, the magnum, the isthmus, uterus or the shell gland and
vagina.
І The infundubulum (the funnel) picks up the ovulated egg. It is also the site of
fertilization.
ІІ The magnum is where the albumen is secreted
ІІІ The isthmus is where the shell membrane is secreted
ІV The uterus secretes the shell, adds fluid to the egg (plumping) and stratifies the
albumen
V The vagina stores sperm and aids in the expulsion of the full formed egg.
2.3.3 Ovulation
Ovulation is the release of the ovum from the ovarian follicles. It occurs through the
rupture of the follicles along streak called stigma (a specialized region of the follicle wall)
(Zakaria, 2001; Etches, 1996).
Ovulatory Cycle
The ovulatory cycle of hens is hormonally controlled by the subtle interaction of the
gonadotropins and ovarian steroid hormones. The ovulatory cycle of hens is defined as the
interval between consecutive ovulations. By subtraction of the consecutive times of ovulation,
the length of the ovulatory cycle reveals that they vary from a minimum of 25.12 hours to a
maximum of 28.53 hours within sequences of 2 to 6 eggs (Etches, 1996). The last ovulation of
a sequence is separated by approximately 40 hours from the first ovulation of the next
sequence because one full day elapses during which ovulation does not occur.
The minimum length of the ovulatory cycle of hens maintained under 14 hours of light
(14L: 10D) is therefore, 24 hours. This minimum is achieved by only a small proportion of
hens when the rate of lay is very high during peak production. In practice, it is technically
difficult to establish times of ovulation directly. Ovulation of the second and all subsequent
ova in a sequence however occurs 30-45 minutes after oviposition of the preceding egg and
this relationship is used to establish the time of ovulation (Etches, 1996).
22
An ovulatory cycle extends from the oviposition of the first egg of the next clutch.
Generally, the laying cycle of hen is governed by the lightning schedule. If the hen is given
12-14 hours of light per day, the first egg of the clutch is usually laid early in the morning. As
a rule, ovulation occurs shortly after oviposition (5-60 mins), and approximately 26 hours are
required before newly ovulated ovum acquires its integuments and is ready to be laid as an
egg (Zakaria, 2001). Because ovulation does not occur until after oviposition and because the
completion of the formation of the eggs requires at least 24 hours, each succeeding egg in the
clutch is laid later than the first egg of the clutch, the last egg of the clutch is laid early in the
afternoon. The hens with the longest clutches ovulate very shortly after oviposition and takes
less time (some only 24 hours) to complete the egg (Etches, 1996).
Under ordinary daylight conditions, ovulation occurs in the morning hours and almost
never after 3.00 pm. The ovulated egg spends about 3.5 hours in the magnum portion of the
oviduct where it acquires the albumen coat, 1.25 hours in the isthmus where the soft shell
membranes are formed and 21 hours in the uterus where the calciferous shell is applied. A
total of 25-26 hours is therefore required for egg formation. The succeeding egg is ovulated
30-60 minutes after the egg is oviposited (Jakowski and Kaufman, 2004).
Hormonal Control of Ovulation
The mechanisms controlling ovulation luteinizing hormone (LH) release, oviposition
and the eggs rate of travel through the oviduct have been worked out in part, but some details
remain unknown (Jakowski and Kaufman, 2004). Zakaria (2001) reported that the interval
between ovulation of two successive eggs is usually 24 to 28 hours. But the important
questions are , how is ovulation triggered? Why would a hen ovulate consecutively for several
days and then skip a day? And how are the intervals between ovulations kept at the stated
hours? According to Pineda and Dooley (2003), ovulation is brought about by the release of
the ovulatory (Luteinizing ) hormone from the pituitary gland governed by a timing
mechanism that is influenced by day length and the ovarian hormones.
Pesek (1999) suggested that follicular growth and maturation in the hen depends on a
constant output of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) by the pituitary with based levels of
luteinizing hormone (LH). At the specific times during the ovulatory cycle, there is an
increased release of the LH which causes ovulation. An “excitation hormone” acts via the
neural pathway (hypolothamus) to trigger the LH release. The threshold for the action of the
23
“excitation hormone” undergoes diurnal fluctuations. If the level of the excitation hormone
reaches the threshold level necessary for LH release, the gonadotropin is released and
ovulation follows. Since successive follicles mature at intervals of 24 hours plus a lag (at a
later time each day), the increase in excitation hormone will follow a similar time course. As a
result, the neural components would be stimulated at a progressively later time each day until
eventually the peak level of the excitation hormone would occur at a time when the neural
threshold would also be elevated. Because the given concentration of the excitation hormone
was not sufficiently high to trigger the LH release, no ovulation would occur on that day and
there would be no pause in the ovulatory cycle. Luteinizing hormone would be stimulated
again the next day when the neural threshold for LH had decreased and ovulation would again
resume. The excitation hormone is generally assumed to be progesterone.
Zakaria (2001) indicated that it is very challenging to disentangle the hypothalamo-
hypophyseal-ovarian relationship in the hen because all the changes are compressed into 24-
26 hours ovulating cycle. Jakowski and Kaufman (2004) explained that there is experimental
evidence to show that the oviductal nervous system participates in signaling instructions to the
pituitary gland, and that instruction not to release amounts of gonadotropic hormones
adequate for ovulation may originate in the oviduct. Such signaling systems are frequently
involved in phenomena controlled by hormones and that they are part of the neuroendocrine
feedback mechanisms. In the hen, it seems to operate as follows: If a yolk is present in the
magnum, a nerve conducted signal goes from the oviduct preventing new ovulations from
occurring. Thus, no ovulatory dose of gonadotropic hormones would be released until the
oviduct is ready for the next egg. Soon after the egg leaves the oviduct and enters the uterus
(shell gland), these signals stop and the pituitary gland now releases the amount of
gonadotropic hormones needed to accomplish ovulation, some 8 to 12 hours later that is, after
the hard shelled egg is laid. As soon as the next ovum enters the oviduct, the ovulation
blocking signal action again becomes effective and holds further ovulation in check.
According to Hanson (2005), day length, temperature and humidity influence
reproduction. In areas where the climate is stable and day length is constant, rainfall may
trigger reproductive behaviour. Biological clocks known as “Circannual Cycles” control the
release of the hormones that regulate reproduction, metabolism and behaviour. Light
stimulates a part of the brain- the hypothalamus, to produce “releasing factors”. These
releasing factors stimulate the anterior pituitary to secrete hormones known as gonadotropins.
24
Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) and Luteinizing Hormone (LH) are two gonadotropins
produced by the anterior pituitary which affect the ovaries. FSH and, to a lesser degree, LH,
are responsible for normal ovarian follicular growth. As the follicle increases in size, they
produce increasing amounts of oestrogen and progesterone. Progesterone acts on LH which
triggers ovulation. Once ovulation occurs, progesterone secretion increases rapidly.
2.3.4 Egg Formation
According to Daghir (2008) and Obioha (1992), the egg is formed from an interaction
of hormonal, structural and nutritional process. The yolk forms in the ovary, its protein being
synthesized in and transported from the kidney and liver. The fat in the yolk is mainly dietary
or demobilized from fat deposits. Both fat and protein are transported by the blood. The yolk
material contains 35% fat, 17% protein and 50% water (Latour et al., 2003). According to
Latour et al. (2003), the formation of the egg involves the transport of large quantities of
material across numerous biological membranes, and the formation of many new substances,
particularly specific proteins and lipids. The size and the composition of the egg are affected
by numerous genetic environmental and physiologic factors. The passage of the egg down the
oviduct is made possible by peristalsis, probably aided to some extent by cilliary action.
According to BFREPA (2003), the original purpose of an egg was a protective development
chamber for an embryo to eventually produce a day old chick. Genetics and nutrition have led
to current layer strains, aimed more specifically at producing eggs for human consumption.
2.4 Oviposition
Oviposition (laying of the hen’s egg) is the expulsion of the fully calcified egg from the
reproductive tract. It requires coordination of the muscular activity of the shell gland with the
behavioural repertoire during which the hen investigates and selects a nest. Except for the last
oviposition of a sequence, expulsion of the egg is initiated by the pre-ovulatory endocrine
events that are associated with ovulation (Zakaria, 2001; Novo et al., 1997; Etches, 1996).
Oviposition is under both hormonal and neural control. The time of oviposition may be
determined by ovulation via changes in the ruptured follicle. The post ovulatory (ruptured)
follicle is necessary for oviposition because its removal delays oviposition (Novo et al.,
1997). It is not known precisely how oviposition is initiated, but both hormonal and neural
mechanisms are involved (Reddy et al., 2004). Whatever the stimulus, contraction of the
25
uterine musculature forces the egg into the vaginal region. This may be under neural
control, for stimulation of the central/nervous system can affect it, but hormones are also
involved.
Oviposition may also be regulated by the balance of the circulating steroid sex
hormones. Oluyemi and Roberts (2000) observed that progesterone is involved in ovulation.
Progesterone acts on the hormone-releasing factors in the hypothalamus to cause the release
for LH from the anterior pituitary which causes release of yolk from the ovary (Imai, 2003).
Johnson (1990) noted that in birds, ovulation and oviposition are processes controlled
by LH and sex steroids, including progesterone. Surges of LH and progesterone have been
observed between 4 and 7 hours before ovulation in laying chicken, quails and ducks and 2-8
hours before ovulation in laying turkey hens.
2.4.1 Sequential Laying
Chickens lay eggs in sequence or clutches. Normally the egg laying pattern follows
certain rules. The first rule is that egg of a sequence is laid within 1-2 hours after daylight.
Secondly, each egg in a sequence is laid later in the day. Thirdly, the last egg of a sequence is
typically laid about 9-10 hours after daylight as shown in Table 1.
26
Table 1: Sequence of egg laying in hens after daylight
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7
9.05 13.30
8.44 11.26 15.15
8.01 10.00 12.03 15.23
7.24 9.22 10.26 11.46 15.05
7.33 9.20 10.34 11.30 12.34 15.40
7.45 9.12 10.10 10.51 11.39 12.38 15.26
(Robinson and Renema, 1999a; Etches, 1996).
27
Table 1 shows times of successive ovipositions under 14L:10D photoperiod. The last
ovulation of a sequence is followed by a day during which ovulation does not occur. According
to Etches (1996), birds can lay eggs for period of about 12 months without stopping. Birds can
lay up to 358 eggs in one year.
2.4.2 Clutch/Sequence Length
The number of eggs laid by a hen on consecutive days before a pause is known as a
clutch. A clutch is terminated a day an egg is not laid. A prolific hen lays five or more eggs in
a clutch, the clutches being separated by not more than a day of rest (pause). Clutches of 50-
100 eggs are not uncommon and many hens have laid 365 eggs in a year (Butcher and Miles,
2000). A hen laying 20, 30, or more eggs in one clutch accomplishes this by two means.
Shortening the interval between oviposition and ovulation to a few minutes (hens with very
long clutches ovulate even before the egg is laid) and/or shortening the time the egg spends in
the shell gland to as little as 18hours (Jakowski and Kaufman, 2004).
According to Robinson and Renema (1999b), the tendency of some hens to lay short
clutches (1 to 2 eggs) and others to lay longer clutches (6 and up to 100 or more) is a heritable
characteristic. Sequence length varies within birds of the same species depending on the cross
and probably, environmental conditions of the area in which the birds are laying.
Robinson and Renema (1999b), working on broiler breeder hens, observed that hens
have slow rate of follicular maturation (26-28hours or more) lay shorter (2-3 days) sequence.
On the other hand, hens that lay very long sequence typically have maturation rates of 24
hours or less. Sequence length changes throughout the egg production year with the longest
sequence seen at the time of peak production at about 30-35 weeks of age. All hens lay one
characteristically long sequence of eggs known as the “Prime Sequence” which in broiler
breeders is usually about 20 eggs in a length (Robinson and Renema, 1999b).
2.4.3 Pause (Skip days)
Pause is defined as the time between two clutches in which the hen is considered a low
producer. Pause may be due to environmental or genetic factors. The number of eggs in a
clutch and the number of pause days between clutches can be regular or irregular. Robinson
and Renema (1999b) illustrated this using data on white leghorn pullets:
Hen 1 00-00-00-two-egg cycle
Hen 2 000-000-000-three-egg cycle
28
Hen 3 000-000-000 Regular Sequence, Regular Skip
Hen 4 00-000-0-000-Irregular Sequence, Regular Skip
Hen 5 00-000-0---- Irregular Sequence, Irregular Skip
“0” represents an egg while “-” represents a pause day.
2.4.4 Oviposition Time
Oviposition time is the actual time of the day in which an egg is laid. Under optimal
lighting conditions (usually 12-14 hours), a hen usually lays its first egg in the sequence in the
early hours of the morning and subsequent eggs are laid progressively later in the day. The
time of the day during which the hen lay most of their eggs is referred to as oviposition peak
period. This period falls in the morning hours in the domestic fowl. The actual time of the day
when eggs are laid depends on the length of the sequence and the position of the egg in the
sequence and also on the number of hours of daylight. Time of laying may also be influenced
by feeding schedule (Herren, 1994). If hens receive no light cues by being kept under
continuous light with natural daylight excluded and are fed only from 8am-4pm, most of the
eggs will be laid within those hours. On the other hand, if feeding is from 8pm to 4am, the
hens will adjust to the new schedule by laying most of their eggs during the new feeding
period (Herren, 1994).
2.4.5 Time Interval between successive eggs and lag
The difference between interval length of one egg and 24 hours is termed “lag”. The lag
or the interval between successively laid eggs in a sequence appears to be greater for the first
two or last two laid eggs of the sequence than those of the intervening eggs, length of the
sequence not withstanding. With average hens laying about 3-4 eggs per clutch, the interval is
about 26 hours. Such hens may lay first egg of clutch at 9am, the second at 11am, and third at
1pm and perhaps fourth at 3-4 pm.
As hens do not normally ovulate after 2pm, no ovulation will occur on fourth day resulting
in no egg laid on fifth day and a four-egg clutch will be terminated. The oviposition interval
by most hens range from 24-28 hours (Zakaria, 2001). Robinson and Renema (1999b) also
reported that “lag” is greater between the first and second egg in the clutch, then decreases
towards the end of the cycle. However, negative “lag” occurs in the middle of long cycles and
under such condition the interval between eggs is less than 24 hours. “Lag” again increases
towards the end of a sequence. This interval between eggs and the rhythm of lay mainly
29
represents difference in time of ovulation. “Lag” does not represent difference in time of
day of one oviposition with respect to its predecessor.
2.4.6 Total Egg Production
Total egg production is an attribute of the number and length of clutches, the duration
of the laying period, the rate of lay, number of pause days and length of broody period. Total
egg production is often calculated by a method which includes the effect of mortality. The
method involves dividing the total number of eggs laid during a period by the number of hens
or pullets housed at the beginning of the period. This gives a value known as hen-housed
average or production index.
The problem in this method is that high mortality during the period will lower the
value even though the surviving hens may have laid exceedingly well. Reddy et al. (2004)
modified the hen-housed method by replacing it with survivor egg production as one of egg
production indices. Survivor egg production is calculated by dividing the total number of eggs
laid by the number of surviving birds. It can be expressed in percentage.
According to Ani and Nnamani (2011), if a hen lays in clutches of single eggs, the most
she can lay in a thirty-day period is 15 eggs. If she lays 2-egg clutches, her maximum record
in 30 days is 20 eggs, an increase of 33.5%, where she lays in 3-egg clutches throughout the
month, she could make a total of 23 eggs which is a further increase of 15% over the 2-egg
clutch. In order for the hen to be able to produce 300 or more eggs annually, the clutch length
must be 5 or more eggs. Imai (2003) estimated that hens laying at 60% for nine months will
produce as many eggs as a hen laying at 90% for six months.
2.4.7 Rate/Intensity of Lay
The number of eggs produced in a given period of time is dependent on sequence
length. If a hen lays more egg in a given time, then, her rate of lay is high. If the hen lays
more number of eggs per clutch, the hen is usually a better layer than the hen that lays fewer
number of eggs. Although rate of lay is a lowly heritable trait, family selection for this trait
can bring about improvement (Reddy et al., 2004). Butcher and Miles (2000) had observed
that a hen may lay approximately 250 eggs per annum.
Only a few hens lay everyday for 100 or more consecutive days. The rate of lay
depends primarily on the ability of the ovary to produce ova and this has a direct bearing on
30
the stage of life of a hen. Based on individual competence, the laying period of a hen can be
divided into 3 phases
Phase 1: Onset of lay
Phase 2: Main period of lay
Phase 3: Remaining of the pullet year
Phase 1 lasts about one or two months and during which the hens attain their peak
production. The onset of lay corresponds to the seventh month of age and is characterized by
(і) Laying of soft-shelled eggs (іі) Irregular laying with long intervals between eggs and
laying of more than one egg in one day in which one or both may be abnormal. Phase 2 is
characterized by regular egg production and falls within 11 months of age of bird. Phase 3 is a
relatively short period during which egg laying rapidly comes to an end (Latour, 2003; Etches,
1996).
2.5 Egg quality
The quality of an egg is defined by its internal and external attributes. The internal
attributes consist of quality of the albumen and yolk parts, while the external quality is
dependent on the egg shell quality which is related to the existence of cracked shell or stains
(Berardinelli et al., 2005). In general, exterior and internal egg quality standards are based on
shell cleanliness, shell soundness, shell texture, shell shape, relative viscosity of the albumen,
freedom from foreign matter in the albumen, shape and firmness of the yolk, and freedom
from yolk defect (Kemps et al., 2006).
Internal egg quality
Internal egg quality involves functional, aesthetic and microbiological properties of the egg
yolk and albumen. The proportions of components for fresh egg are 32% yolk, 58% albumen
and 10% shell (Robinson and Renema, 1999b).
The egg white is formed by four structures. Firstly, the chalaziferous layer or chalazae,
immediately surround the yolk, accounting for 3% of the white. Next is the inner thin layer,
which surrounds the chalazae and accounts for 17% of the white. Third is the firm or thick
layer, which provides an envelope or jacket that holds the inner thin white and the yolk. It
adheres to the shell membrane at each end of the egg and accounts for 57% of the albumen.
Finally, the outer thin layer lies just inside the shell membranes, except where the thick white
is attached to the shell, and accounts for 23% of the egg white (USDA, 2000).
External egg quality
31
Exterior egg quality is judged on the basis of texture, colour, shape, soundness and
cleanliness according to USDA (2000) standards. It has been always recognized that the hen
has the most extraordinary method of obtaining and depositing calcium (Ca) in the entire
animal kingdom. An egg has an average of 2.3 g of calcium in the shell, and almost 25 mg in
the yolk (Etches, 1996). A modern hen laying 330 eggs per cycle will deposit 767 g of
calcium; assuming a 50% calcium retention rate from the diet, the hen will consume 1.53 kg
of calcium per cycle (Etches, 1996).
2.5.1 Egg weight
This is a highly heritable trait which can be improved by selection. Birds which mature
early tend to lay smaller eggs than those that mature late. The mature egg is approximately 55-
58 gms (Reddy et al., 2004).
Egg weight is influenced by breed, nutrition, season and disease condition. It is also influenced
by the type of housing (Reddy et al., 2004).
2.6 Physical Characteristics
According to Daghir (2008) and Gillespie (1997), in order to determine whether or not
the hen is laying, it is advisable to examine the condition of the comb, wattles, eyes, beaks,
pubic bones, abdomen and vent. A laying hen has large bright, red, soft and waxy comb and
wattles. The eyes are bright and prominent. The beak is bleached. The eyelids and eyerings are
bleached. The pubic bones are flexible and spread wide enough for two to four fingers to be
placed between them. The abdomen is full, soft and pliable. The vent is moist, bleached and
enlarged (Gillespie, 1997). A non-laying hen has a small, pale, scaly and shrunken comb. The
beak is yellow, and the eyes are dull and sunken. The eyelids and eyerings are also yellow. The
pelvis bones are stiff and close together with room for less than two fingers between them. The
abdomen is full and hard. The vent is dry, puckered and yellow (Gillespie, 1997; Obioha,
1992).
Past production is indicated by the amount of yellow pigment left in the body and the
time of moult. Moulting is the process of losing the feathers from the body or wings. Producing
a large number of eggs bleaches the yellow pigment from the hen’s body. The beak, eye ring,
ear lobes and shanks are bleached white. The feathers are worn and soiled. The pigment
bleaches from the hen’s body in a definite order as laying progresses. The pigment leaves the
vent first. It becomes fully bleached after about one week of laying. The eye ring is next to
bleach, requiring about seven to ten days to become fully bleached. The beak bleaches next,
32
starting at the base and progressing to the tip. This takes 4 to 6 weeks. The shanks are last to
bleach. The shank bleaches in this order (1) front of shanks (2) rear of shanks (3) tops of toes
(4) hock joints. It requires 4 to 6 months for the shanks to be fully bleached (Gillespie, 1997).
When the hen stops laying, the pigments return to the body parts in the same order in which it
left. Return of the colour takes about one half of the time required for bleaching. A hen that has
been a poor layer will show yellow pigment in the body parts mentioned above.
A high rate of lay is indicated by the shape and refinement of the head, the width and
depth of the body, the abdominal capacity, the softness and pliability of the skin, the shape of
the shanks. A hen with a high rate of lay has a moderately deep and broad head (Daghir, 2008;
Gillespie, 1997). The face is free of wrinkles and the comb and wattle are fine and smooth
textured. The hen has large body capacity; the abdomen is soft and pliable. The shanks are flat
or wedge shaped.
A hen with poor rate of lay has a long shallow head and a back that is narrow and
tapering. The pubic bones are narrow and thick while the abdomen is hard. The skin is tight
and thick. The shanks are narrow and round.
Obioha (1992) divided layers into good and poor layers as follows:
Good layers Poor layers
Appearance of:
Comb: Large, full, plump, smooth and waxy
Limp covered with white scales, dry,
shriveled
Eye: bright
Dull
Beak: white and well bleached
Yellow colour at base of beak and extending
towards the tip
Eye ring and Earlobe: white and well bleached
Yellow or tinted
Vent: white or well bleached, large, soft,
moist, oval, sometimes over-hanging
Yellow or tinted, small, hard, dry, round
sometimes appear contracted
Wattles: Prominent, soft, smooth
Rough and dry
Face: bright red Yellow tint
33
Head: alert, healthy
Dull, listless
Moulting: sheds feathers late and rapidly
Sheds early and slowly
Pubic bone: thin, pliable, and relatively wide
apart about 2 or more fingers
Thick, blunt and relatively close together, less
than 2 fingers, rigid.
Abdomen: loose, pliable, soft, full when in
laying condition. Deep from pubic bones to
the rear of keel about 4 fingers width
Tight, hard, tucked up. Rear end of the keel
rather close to the pubic bone less than 3
fingers width
Activity: active, alert
Inactive, tired
Plumage: worn, soiled, close New, glossy, loose
2.7 Climatic Condition
For many years, researchers have been investigating the effect of high environmental
temperature and relative humidity on the performance of different poultry species, including
turkeys (McKee and Sams, 1997), young chickens (Henken et al., 1983), broilers (Cooper and
Washburn, 1998), broiler breeders (McDaniel et al., 1995) and laying hens (Emery et al., 1984;
Muiruri and Harrison, 1991; Whitehead et al., 1998), and have found that high environmental
temperatures have deleterious effects on productive performance. In laying hens, heat stress
depresses body weight (Scott and Balnave, 1988), egg production (Muiruri and Harrison, 1991;
Whitehead et al., 1998), egg weight (Balnave and Muheereza, 1997), and shell quality (Emery
et al., 1984; Mahmoud et al., 1996) and is generally accompanied by suppression of feed
intake which could be the cause of decline in production.
Heat stress in poultry is prompted by combinations of environmental temperature and
humidity that prevent the birds’ thermoregulatory processes from effectively dissipating the
heat produced during metabolism. Poultry birds are said to be thermally stressed when ambient
temperature exceeds body temperature such that peripheral physiologic responses of the bird
can no longer match the external changes (Ezekwe, 2011).
34
During heat stress, the environmental parameters of ambient temperature (AT) and
relative humidity (RH) in general and temperature humidity index (THI) in particular, have
been reported to be an invaluable tool in the presumptive diagnosis of the animal state of
health, and is also relevant in evaluating the adaptability of the animal (Tao and Xin, 2003;
Karaman et al., 2007). Altan et al. (2003) reported that high ambient temperature and relative
humidity, increases heat stress and are responsible for the increase in rectal/body temperature.
Chronic heat stress results in behavioural changes, depressed feed intake (Daghir, 2008; Oguz
et al., 2010) and a wide range of metabolic activities (Sahin et al., 2002), including elevation
of body temperature, electrolyte, acid-base and hormonal imbalances (Holik, 2009); and tissue
damage (Sinkalu et al., 2008). Egg production and shell quality in laying hens will be
depressed (Asli et al., 2007; Ajakaiye et al., 2011).
The ideal temperature (conventionally referred to as the zone of thermoneutrality) under
which performance of laying hens is not adversely affected by temperature has been identified
by Holik (2009) and Imik et al. (2009) as 18-220C.
Temperatures outside the critical limits of the thermoneutral zone such as those prevailing
in most humid tropical regions of the world have been reported to constitute heat stress (CTA,
1987; Ensminger et al., 1990; Kucuk, 2003; Hoilk, 2009; Tuleun et al., 2010; Whitehead and
Mitchell, 2010).
Egg quality and production as a whole is affected by temperature which is manifested by
the effect it has on the physiology and metabolism of the hen. During hot weather, there is a
reduction of carbonate ions in the blood which lowers the buffering capacity and may lead to
poor buffering of hydrogen ions produced during shell formation. This explains why there is a
low egg production in hot weather and also why eggs laid during hot weather have thin shells
(Ajakaiye et al., 2011; Asli, 2007). It was also noted by Kirunda et al. (2001) that the specific
gravity of eggs declined at the onset of warm weather.
High temperature could prevent the reproductive tract of laying hens from probably getting
enough nutrient supply as a result of low blood supply and therefore reducing nutrients
reaching the tract for normal egg formation (Ezekwe, 2011).
Excessively high relative humidity makes adaptation to extremes of temperature more
difficult. An increase in relative humidity decrease loss of heat by evaporation at high
temperatures and decreases thermal isolation of the animal at low temperatures (Leeson, 1986).
35
CHAPTER THREE
MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Location and Duration of Study
The study was carried out in the Poultry Unit of the Department of Animal Science
Teaching and Research Farm, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. It lasted for a period of ten weeks
(1st July – 9
th September, 2011).
During this period, hens were observed daily and egg collection was done hourly
between 0600h and 1800h for the first eight weeks, while the subsequent two weeks were used
to appraise their physical characteristics. The study was conducted in late rainy season.
3.2 Experimental Birds
One hundred and fifty 36 weeks old hens, comprising seventy-five Shaver brown and
seventy-five Nera black hens each in their 12th
week of lay were used. The hens were selected
from a flock of laying hens in the farm. Each hen was housed in individual battery cage as
observations were made on individuals.
3.3 Management of Hens
The hens were housed in an open-sided building with a block wall of 90cm high and
wire netting to the roof. Feeding containers used were v-shaped, long and detachable feeders
and water containers used were U – shaped. Hens were fed commercial layers mash containing
16.5% crude protein, 2650 kcal/kg of metabolizable energy, 4% crude fat, 6.5% crude fibre,
3.6% calcium and 0.4% phosphorus. Each hen received about 125g of layers’ mash daily and
ad libitum supply of water . The water supplied to the birds was medicated with an anti-stress
(Vitalyte) for a period of one week at the start of the experiment. Eggs were collected daily and
recorded for each hen.
As a general flock prophylactic management strategy, routine vaccinations and other
health operations were carried out as at when due. Wood shavings were spread under the
battery cages to absorb moisture and ease regular removal of poultry droppings from the laying
house, usually weekly. The surroundings of the experimental birds were kept as tidy as
possible.
36
Dead birds were promptly removed and taken to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
University of Nigeria, Nsukka for autopsy when the need arose. No supplemental light was
provided during the period of the study.
3.4 Parameters Measured
3.4.1 Oviposition Time
Oviposition time was recorded hourly during the period of the study.
3.4.2 Total Egg Production
Total egg production was determined by adding all the eggs produced by each of the
two strains of hen during the study.
3.4.3. Clutch/Sequence Length
This was determined for each hen by counting the number of eggs laid until a day was
skipped.
3.4.4 Pause Days
Days in which no egg was laid by the hens were obtained by adding together such
number of days.
3.4.5 Egg Weight (g)
Egg weight was taken for every egg collected for the hens in relation to oviposition
time weighing was done for all eggs within one hour of collection. Electronic balance (D & G
sensitive scale) was used and the measurement expressed in grammes.
3.4.6 Egg Quality
Sixteen (16) eggs per strain were selected at random weekly for egg quality
determination. The indices evaluated were as follows:
i. Egg Shell Weight (g)
Eggs were carefully broken and dried after which the egg shells were weighed
singly using a weighing balance.
ii. Egg Shell Thickness (mm)
This was determined by pulling off the shell immediately the egg was broken and the
shell was air-dried for a day (24 hours) after which the egg shell thickness was determined
with the help of a micrometer screw guage.
37
iv. Egg Shape Index
The egg shape index was calculated as the proportion of egg length to diameter
v. Albumin Height and Diameter (mm/cm)
The eggs after weighing were broken into a piece of flat glass positioned on a flat
surface. The albumin height was measured using a tripod micrometer. Albumin
diameter was taken as the maximum cross sectional diameter of the albumin using a
pair of calipers and read on a ruler calibrated in millimeter.
vi. Yolk Height and Diameter (mm/cm)
The eggs after weighing were broken into a piece of flat glass positioned on a flat
surface. The Yolk height was measured using a tripod micrometer. Yolk diameter
was taken as the maximum cross sectional diameter of the yolk using a pair of
calipers and read on a ruler calibrated in millimeter.
vii. Albumin Index
The albumin index was calculated as the proportion of yolk height to diameter.
viii. Yolk Index
The yolk index was calculated as the proportion of yolk height to diameter.
ix. Haugh Unit
This was calculated from the values obtained from the albumin height and egg
weight by using the formula:
Haugh’s unit = 100log (H+7.57-1.7W0.37
)
3.4.7 Average Daily Feed Intake
Average Daily feed Intake (g): Feed Offered (g) – Feed not eaten (g)
Number of Hens
3.4.8 Percentage Egg Production
Percentage egg production for each strain of hen was calculated using the formula as
shown below:
1
100
75
8%
daysofNoxhousedbreedeachforhensofNo
weeksforbreedeachbylaideggsofNoproductionegg
Other egg production indices were obtained using the formulae as shown below:
38
a. Hen housed egg production (HHEP): It was obtained by dividing the total number of
eggs by each strain of hen by the number of hens housed in the laying cages. This does not
take mortality into account.
Hen housed egg production (HHEP) =
housedhensofNo
laideggsofNo
b. Hen day egg production (HDEP): It was obtained by dividing the total number of eggs by
each strain of hen by the number of hen days.
Hen day egg production (HDEP) =dayshenofNo
laideggsofNo
3.5 Physical Characteristics
By visual observation, the conditions of the head, comb, wattles, eyes, beaks, pubic
bones, shanks, abdomen, plumage and vent were appraised and noted for all the hens.
Palpation of palpable physical structures of each hen was made. The hens were divided into
three classes according to their egg production rate and physical characteristics as follows:
good layers, intermediate layers and poor layers.
3.6 Temperature
Temperature readings were taken 3-hourly at time intervals of 0900h, 1200h, 1500h
and 1800h using a standard air thermometer and the mean daily temperatures noted
3.7 Experimental design
The experiment had a completely randomized design with the following model;
Yijk = μ + ai + bj + Ɛijk
Where
Yijk = Observed value of dependent variable
μ = Overall mean
ai = Effect of laying and physical characteristics of the ith individual of Shaver brown hens
bj = Effect of laying and physical characteristics of the jth individual of Nera black hens
Ɛijk = Random error associated with observation
39
3.8 Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics such as means and standard error of the means, percentages for
the different parameters were calculated. Data were subjected to analysis of variance
(ANOVA) in a completely randomized design (CRD) using SPSS Package (2003) windows
version 8.0. Significantly different means where separated using Duncan’s New Multiple
Range Test (Duncan, 1955). The statistical procedures used were as described by Steel et al.
(1997).
40
CHAPTER FOUR
RESULTS
The climatic data (Table 2 and Figure 1) taken during the period of the experiment showed that
the study area had the natural day-length of 13 to 14 hours; mean maximum weekly indoor and
outdoor temperatures of 27.90C to 29.2
0C and 26.8
0C to 30.5
0C, respectively; mean minimum
weekly indoor and outdoor temperatures of 20.50C to 22.3
0C and 20.0
0C to 23.60
0C,
respectively; relative humidity of 73.1% to 76.6% and mean total monthly rainfall of
781.33mm.
41
Table 2: Mean weekly environmental temperatures and relative humidity
recorded during the period of study
TEMPERATURES (0C)
WEEK INDOOR OUTDOOR RELATIVE
HUMIDITY
MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM
1 20.50 28.90 23.60 27.90 73.1
2 22.30 29.20 23.10 30.50 73.9
3 20.60 29.20 22.80 28.90 73.6
4 21.10 28.50 21.80 29.60 74.7 5 21.20 28.80 22.50 30.00 74.0
6 21.60 28.80 22.60 29.70 75.3
7 20.80 28.70 21.80 29.50 75.8 8 21.00 28.00 21.70 29.50 76.1
9 21.20 28.60 20.00 27.10 73.1 10 21.10 27.90 20.30 26.80 76.6
Thermo neutral zone for poultry is 18-220C (Imik et al., 2009).
42
Figure 1: Average weekly temperatures (indoor and outdoor) and relative humidity of
the study area
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Weeks
Tem
pera
ture
o
C
oC
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Rela
tive h
um
idity
hum
idity
IT Indoor Outdoor
RH
43
4.1 Results
4.1.1 Egg Laying Characteristics of Shaver Brown Hens
4.1.1.1 Oviposition time
As shown in Table 3, more eggs (86.24%) were laid in the morning hours (0600h –
1159h), while 13.76% of egg were laid in the afternoon hours (1200h – 1700h). Oviposition
reached peak between 0630h to 0730h and declined in the early afternoon hours between
1130h – 1230h until eight eggs were laid between 1530h – 1630h (late afternoon hours).
44
Table 3: Frequency distribution of egg laying of Shaver brown and Nera
black hens during the day
Oviposition Interval Strain Number of eggs laid 6:00am-6:59am Shaver brown 467 7:00am-7:59 am
Nera black Shaver brown
520 496
8.00am-8:59 am
Nera black Shaver brown
555 410
9:00am-9:59 am
Nera black
Shaver brown
497
408
10:00am-10:59 am
Nera black Shaver brown
493 356
11:00am-11:59 am
Nera black Shaver brown
333 269
12:00pm-12:59pm
Nera black Shaver brown
150 174
1:00pm-1:59pm
Nera black Shaver brown
145 105
2:00pm-2:59pm
Nera black Shaver brown
108 69
3:00pm-3-59pm
Nera black Shaver brown
46 33
4:00pm-4:59pm
Nera black Shaver brown
18 3
5:00pm-6:00pm
Nera black
Shaver brown Nera black
6
0 0
45
Table 4: Frequency distribution of egg production of Shaver brown hens Hen code
No.
Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
1 46 1.65 27 49 1.76 53 48 1.72
2 44 1.58 28 55 1.97 54 21 0.75
3 41 1.47 29 51 1.83 55 21 0.75
4 38 1.36 30 32 1.15 56 7 0.25
5 38 1.36 31 46 1.65 57 42 1.50
6 45 1.61 32 48 1.72 58 37 1.33
7 43 1.54 33 41 1.47 59 1 0.04
8 39 1.40 34 51 1.83 60 42 1.50
9 29 1.04 35 53 1.90 61 24 0.86
10 46 1.65 36 7 0.25 62 33 1.18 11 44 1.58 37 49 1.76 63 2 0.07
12 48 1.72 38 33 1.18 64 41 1.47
13 43 1.54 39 36 1.29 65 34 1.22
14 51 1.83 40 19 0.68 66 50 1.79
15 44 1.53 41 50 1.79 67 40 1.43
16 29 1.04 42 11 0.39 68 43 1.54
17 47 1.69 43 29 1.04 69 51 1.83
18 37 1.33 44 40 1.43 70 25 0.90
19 36 1.29 45 48 1.72 71 27 0.97
20 28 1.00 46 47 1.69 72 20 0.71
21 33 1.18 47 47 1.69 73 26 0.93 22 31 1.11 48 46 1.65 74 37 1.33
23 43 1.54 49 28 1.00 75 37 1.33
24 44 1.58 50 48 1.72 2790
25 36 1.29 51 45 1.61
26 37 1.33 52 32 1.15
46
4.1.1.2 Total egg production
The distribution pattern of egg production is shown in Table 4.
Result shows that a total of 2790 eggs were laid by Shaver Brown hens during the
experimental period. The average number of eggs produced by a hen was 37.20 . Egg
production by individual hen ranged from 1 - 55. Therefore, the least number of eggs
produced by a single hen within the experimental period was 1 and the highest number of
eggs produced were 55 eggs.
4.1.1.3 Clutch Length
The distribution pattern of the mean clutch length is shown in Table 5. During the
experimental period, clutch lengths of 1 to 17 were observed. Clutch length of 10 occurred
most frequently and clutch length of 1 occurred only once throughout the period. The data
obtained on clutch length shows that about 56% of the clutch lengths were of 10 cycle lengths
and below. The effect of egg position and clutch size on egg weight is shown in Table 6. The
first eggs in a clutch for Shaver brown hens in general were heavier (P<0.05) than eggs
produced later in a clutch. Egg weight across various clutch sizes varied significantly (P<0.05)
for Shaver Brown hens from 2-egg clutch to the 17-egg clutch. 17-egg clutch had the highest
(P<0.05) egg weight of 66.01g, while 10-egg clutch had the (P<0.05) least egg weight of
56.45g.
47
Table 5: Frequency distribution of mean clutch length of Shaver brown hens Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
1 4.60 1.39 27 6.13 1.85 53 9.60 2.90
2 4.00 1.21 28 2.75 8.31 54 4.20 1.27
3 3.73 1.13 29 10.20 3.08 55 1.31 0.40
4 7.60 2.30 30 2.46 0.74 56 1.40 0.42
5 2.71 0.82 31 5.75 1.74 57 3.23 0.98
6 4.50 1.36 32 6.86 2.08 58 2.47 0.75
7 3.58 1.08 33 2.93 0.89 59 1.00 0.30
8 3.25 0.98 34 8.50 2.57 60 4.67 1.41 9 2.07 0.63 35 4.30 1.30 61 1.85 0.56
10 6.57 1.98 36 1.00 0.30 62 3.00 0.91
11 4.89 1.48 37 7.00 2.11 63 1.00 0.30
12 4.00 1.21 38 2.54 0.77 64 2.56 0.77
13 3.91 1.18 39 3.28 0.99 65 2.42 0.73
14 8.50 2.58 40 2.71 0.82 66 7.14 2.16
15 4.40 1.33 41 8.30 2.51 67 3.33 1.01
16 1.81 0.55 42 2.20 0.66 68 3.58 1.08
17 5.22 1.58 43 2.90 0.88 69 8.50 2.57
18 2.64 0.78 44 5.00 1.51 70 2.08 0.63
19 2.57 0.78 45 5.30 1.60 71 3.38 1.02 20 2.80 0.85 46 7.83 2.37 72 1.82 0.55
21 4.13 1.25 47 4.27 1.29 73 1.73 0.53
22 2.58 0.78 48 7.67 2.32 74 3.70 1.12
23 3.07 0.93 49 1.65 0.50 75 4.11 1.24
24 4.00 1.21 50 5.33 1.61 331.09
25 2.00 0.60 51 5.63 1.70
26 2.64 0.78 52 4.00 1.21
48
Table 6: Effect of egg position and clutch size on egg weight of Shaver brown hens
Effect of egg position
on egg weight
Egg weight and its
relationship to clutch
size
Position of eggs Egg weight (g) Clutch size Egg weight (g)
1 64.04a - -
2 63.33ab
2-egg clutch 63.88bc
3 62.87ab
3-egg clutch 65.13ab
4 62.08ab
4-egg clutch 63.47bc
5 61.56ab
5-egg clutch 59.85de
6 61.91ab
6-egg clutch 60.90de
7 61.63ab
7-egg clutch 61.47cd
8 61.04ab
8-egg clutch 66.85a
9 59.73ab
9-egg clutch 58.60ef
10 59.46ab
10-egg clutch 56.45fg
11 60.70ab
11-egg clutch 63.88bc
12 60.01ab
12-egg clutch 61.33cd
13 60.45ab
13-egg clutch 63.55bc
14 58.42ab
14-egg clutch 56.02g
15 60.49ab
15-egg clutch 63.42bc
16 60.72ab
16-egg clutch 63.89bc
17 62.44ab
17-egg clutch 66.01ab
SEM 0.23 0.67
a,b,c,d,e,f,g: Mean values in a column with different superscripts are significantly different
(P<0.05)
SEM: standard error of means
49
Table 7: Frequency distribution of pause days of Shaver Brown hens
Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
1 10 0.71 27 7 0.50 53 8 0.57 2 12 0.85 28 1 0.07 54 35 2.48 3 15 1.06 29 5 0.35 55 35 2.48 4 18 1.28 30 24 1.70 56 49 3.48
5 18 1.28 31 10 0.71 57 14 0.99 6 11 0.78 32 8 0.57 58 19 1.35 7 13 0.92 33 15 1.06 59 55 3.90 8 17 1.21 34 5 0.35 60 14 0.99 9 27 1.92 35 3 0.21 61 32 2.27 10 10 0.71 36 49 3.48 62 23 1.63 11 12 0.85 37 7 0.50 63 54 3.83 12 8 0.57 38 23 1.63 64 15 1.06
13 13 0.92 39 20 1.42 65 22 1.56 14 5 0.35 40 37 2.62 66 6 0.43 15 12 0.85 41 6 0.43 67 16 1.14 16 27 1.92 42 45 3.19 68 13 0.92 17 9 0.64 43 27 1.92 69 5 0.35 18 19 1.35 44 16 1.14 70 31 2.20 19 20 1.42 45 8 0.57 71 29 2.06 20 28 1.99 46 9 0.64 72 36 2.55
21 23 1.63 47 9 0.64 73 30 2.13 22 25 1.77 48 10 0.71 74 19 1.35 23 13 0.92 49 28 1.99 75 19 1.35 24 12 0.85 50 8 0.57 1410 25 20 1.42 51 11 0.78 26 19 1.35 52 24 1.70
50
51
Table 8: Effect of oviposition interval on egg weight of Shaver brown hens
Oviposition time interval Egg weight (g) Sig.
6.00am-6.59am 70.05±1.07a *
7.00am-7.59am 68.79±1.52a *
8.00am-8.59am 68.81±0.63a *
9.00am-9.59am 67.85±0.68ab *
10.00am-10.59am 66.07±0.48bc *
11.00am-11.59am 65.63±0.58bc *
12.00pm-12.59pm 63.72±0.49c *
1.00pm-1.59pm 58.22±1.29d *
2.00pm-2.59pm 53.61±0.63e *
3.00pm-6.00pm 51.50±0.43e *
Overall mean 63.43±0.75
a,b,c,d,e: Mean values in a column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05); *=(p<0.05)
52
4.1.1.4 Pause Days
The distribution pattern of the number of pause days is shown in Table 6. The total number of
pause days for all birds were 1410 days. Of these, pause days of 8 and 19 occurred most
frequently and pause days of 1, 14 and 22 were the least.
4.1.1.5 Egg Weight
The mean egg weight for Shaver Brown hens (Table 7) was 63.43 ±0.75(P<0.05) and ranged
from 43 – 89g. Eggs laid in the morning hours were significantly (P<0.05) heavier than those
laid later in the day. The difference in mean egg weight (P<0.05) between eggs laid from
0600h to 0700h and those laid from 1500h to 1800h was 18.55g. The first eggs in a clutch in
general were heavier than eggs produced later in a clutch.
4.1.1.6 Intensity/ Rate of lay
As shown in Table 4, the 56 days used to appraise the laying characteristics of Shaver Brown
hens, the 75 hens laid 2790 eggs, giving overall production rate of 66.43%. Good layers laid
1915 eggs representing 56% of eggs laid, intermediate layers laid 847 eggs accounting for
37.3% and poor layers laid 28 eggs or 6.67% of the eggs laid.
53
4.1.1.7 Hen housed egg production (HHEP):
The mean number of eggs produced by each hen for the period of the study was 45.60 eggs for
good layers; 30.25 eggs for intermediate layers and 5.60 eggs for poor layers (Table 3) . For
the 75 Shaver brown hens altogether, the mean number of eggs produced by each hen was
37.20 eggs during the 56 days of the study.
4.1.1.8 Hen day egg production (HDEP):
The mean number of eggs laid daily by good layers was 34.19 eggs, intermediate and poor
layers 15.12 and 0.5 eggs respectively (Table 3) . The general mean was 49.82 eggs daily.
54
Table 9: classification of experimental hens Strain No. of hens PCLAL No. of eggs Clutch
length
Pause days Physical characteristics
Shaver brown 42
Good
(56%)
45.60
(38-56)
1.32
(1.00-2.20)
11.57
(5-18)
White shanks, bleached
beak, white cloaca.
Nera black 50
Good
(66.67%)
46.02
(38-56)
1.45
(0.0-2.50)
8.58
(2-17)
Shaver brown 28
Intermediate
(37.33%)
30.25
(19-37)
2.67
(1.31-4.30)
25.75
(19-37)
Bleaching shank,
bleaching beak,
bleaching cloaca Nera black 16
Intermediate
(21.33%)
31.88
(19-37)
3.45
(1.71-8.50)
24.13
(19-35)
Shaver brown 5
Poor
(6.67%)
5.60
(0-18)
5.94
(2.71-13.00)
51.20
(49-55)
Dry cloaca
Nera black
9
Poor
(12.00%)
7.08
(8.50-18.0)
55.56
(40-56)
PCLAL = Performance class of layers and % Lay
55
4.1.2 Egg Laying Characteristics of Nera Black Hens
4.1.2.1 Oviposition time
As shown in Table 3 and Figure 1, more eggs (88.75%) were laid in the morning hours (0600h
– 1159h) while 11.25% of eggs were laid in the afternoon hours (1200h – 1700h). Oviposition
reached peak between 0630h to 0730h and declined in the early afternoon hours between
1230h to 1330h until ten eggs were laid between 1530h to 1630h (late afternoon hours).
56
57
Table 10: Frequency distribution of egg production of Nera black hens Hen code
No.
Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code No. Number
observed
Relative
freq.(%)
1 36 1.25 27 49 1.71 53 54 1.88 2 45 1.57 28 39 1.36 54 39 1.71
3 42 1.46 29 46 1.60 55 50 1.74 4 46 1.60 30 47 1.64 56 42 1.46 5 35 1.22 31 27 0.94 57 44 1.53 6 44 1.53 32 41 1.43 58 50 1.74 7 48 1.67 33 37 1.29 59 46 1.60 8 46 1.60 34 35 1.22 60 44 1.53 9 4 0.14 35 39 1.36 61 21 0.73 10 36 1.25 36 48 1.67 62 13 0.45
11 52 1.81 37 51 1.78 63 48 1.67 12 49 1.71 38 52 1.81 64 51 1.78 13 35 1.22 39 42 1.46 65 21 0.73 14 49 1.71 40 30 1.04 66 49 1.71 15 54 1.88 41 0 0 67 35 1.22 16 47 1.64 42 1 0.04 68 11 0.38 17 1 0.04 43 43 1.50 69 24 0.86 18 28 0.98 44 37 1.29 70 43 1.50 19 51 1.78 45 5 0.17 71 36 1.25
20 51 1.78 46 48 1.67 72 40 1.39 21 48 1.67 47 47 1.64 73 52 1.81 22 49 1.71 48 44 1.53 74 41 1.43 23 16 0.56 49 48 1.67 75 4 0.14 24 48 1.67 50 37 1.29 2871 25 5 0.17 51 47 1.64 26 49 1.71 52 49 1.71
58
4.1.2.2 Total egg Production
The distribution pattern of egg production is shown in Table 10.
Result shows that a total of 2871 eggs were laid by the Nera black hens during the
experimental period. The average number of eggs produced by the hens was 38.28. Egg
production by individual hen ranged from 1 - 54. Therefore, the least number of eggs produced
by a single hen within the experimental period was 1 and the highest number of eggs produced
were 54 eggs.
4.1.2.3 Clutch Length
The distribution pattern of the clutch length is shown in Table 11. During the experimental
period, clutch lengths of 1 to 17 were observed. Clutch length of 10 occurred most frequently
and clutch lengths of 15, 16 and 17 occurred only once each throughout the period. The data
obtained on clutch length show that about 81% of the clutch lengths were of 10 cycle lengths
and below. The effect of egg position on egg weight and clutch size is shown in (Table
12).The first eggs in a clutch for Nera black hens in general were heavier (P>0.05) than eggs
produced later in a clutch.
Egg weight across various clutch sizes varied significantly (P<0.05) for Nera Black hens.
Clutch size ranged from 2-egg clutch to the 17-egg clutch. A clutch of two had the highest
(P<0.05) egg weight of 68.31g, while 6-egg clutch had the least egg weight of 54.44g
(P<0.05).
59
Table 11: Frequency distribution of mean clutch length of Nera Black hens Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Clutch
length
Relative
freq.(%)
1 7.20 1.71 27 9.80 2.32 53 18.00 4.27 2 4.50 1.07 28 3.90 0.92 54 5.44 1.29
3 3.23 0.77 29 4.60 1.09 55 8.33 1.97 4 4.18 0.99 30 11.75 2.78 56 10.50 2.49 5 3.50 0.83 31 1.93 0.46 57 4.40 1.04 6 4.89 1.16 32 5.13 1.22 58 12.50 2.96 7 5.33 1.26 33 2.18 0.52 59 7.67 1.82 8 4.18 0.99 34 3.50 0.83 60 6.29 1.49 9 1.00 0.24 35 3.00 0.71 61 1.91 0.45 10 5.14 1.22 36 6.86 1.62 62 1.30 0.31
11 13.00 3.08 37 10.20 2.42 63 6.86 1.63 12 6.13 1.45 38 13.00 3.08 64 8.50 2.01 13 2.50 0.59 39 3.20 0.76 65 1.75 0.41 14 8.17 1.94 40 6.00 1.42 66 7.00 1.66 15 18.00 4.26 41 0.0 0.0 67 2.19 0.52 16 4.70 1.11 42 1.00 0.27 68 1.22 0.29 17 1.00 0.24 43 3.91 0.93 69 1.71 0.41 18 5.60 1.33 44 3.08 0.73 70 5.38 1.27 19 8.50 2.01 45 2.50 0.59 71 3.27 0.77
20 7.29 1.73 46 6.86 1.63 72 3.64 0.86 21 5.33 1.26 47 9.40 2.23 73 10.40 0.03 22 8.17 1.95 48 3.67 0.87 74 2.73 0.65 23 1.78 0.42 49 6.86 1.63 75 2.00 0.47 24 6.00 1.42 50 3.70 0.88 422.26 25 1.25 0.30 51 4.70 1.11 26 8.17 1.94 52 9.80 2.32
60
Table 12: effect of egg position and clutch size on egg weight of Nera black hens Effect of egg position
egg weight
Egg weight and its
relationship to clutch
size
Position of eggs Egg weight (g) Clutch size Egg weight (g)
1 63.61 - -
2 62.91 2-egg clutch 68.31a
3 61.39 3-egg clutch 68.19ab
4 60.38 4-egg clutch 61.49de
5 60.07 5-egg clutch 57.21
ef
6 60.50 6-egg clutch 54.44g
7 61.44 7-egg clutch 66.22bc
8 60.54 8-egg clutch 57.03
ef
9 60.97 9-egg clutch 64.91cd
10 60.57 10-egg clutch 61.96de
11 61.56 11-egg clutch 55.04
ef
12 61.82 12-egg clutch 63.65cd
13 61.57 13-egg clutch 63.19cd
14 61.45 14-egg clutch 65.17bc
15 60.12 15-egg clutch 57.60
ef
16 63.28 16-egg clutch 64.71cd
17 63.63 17-egg clutch 65.43bc
SEM 0.21 0.21
a,b,c,d,e,f,g: Mean values in a column with different superscripts are significantly different
(P<0.05)
SEM: standard error of means
61
4.1.2.4 Pause Days
The distribution pattern of the number of pause days is shown in Table 13. The total number of
pause days for all the birds were 1329 days. Of these pause days, of 7 and 8 occurred most
frequently while pause days of 11, 16, 26, 32, 40, 43, 45 and 52 were the least.
62
Table 13: Frequency distribution of pause days of Nera black hens Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
Hen code
No.
Pause days Relative
freq.(%)
1 20 1.51 27 7 0.53 53 2 0.15
2 11 0.83 28 17 1.28 54 7 0.58 3 14 1.05 29 10 0.75 55 6 0.45 4 10 0.75 30 9 0.68 56 14 1.05 5 21 1.58 31 29 2.18 57 12 0.90 6 12 0.90 32 15 1.13 58 6 0.45 7 8 0.60 33 19 1.43 59 10 0.75 8 10 0.75 34 21 1.58 60 12 0.90 9 52 3.91 35 17 1.28 61 35 2.63
10 20 1.51 36 8 0.60 62 43 3.24 11 4 0.30 37 5 0.38 63 8 0.60 12 7 0.53 38 4 0.30 64 5 0.38 13 21 1.58 39 14 1.05 65 35 2.63 14 7 0.53 40 26 1.96 66 7 0.53 15 2 0.15 41 56 4.21 67 21 1.58 16 9 0.68 42 55 4.14 68 45 3.39 17 55 4.14 43 13 0.98 69 32 2.41 18 28 2.11 44 19 1.43 70 13 0.98
19 5 0.38 45 51 3.84 71 20 1.51 20 5 0.38 46 8 0.60 72 16 1.20 21 8 0.60 47 9 0.68 73 4 0.30 22 7 0.53 48 12 0.90 74 15 1.13 23 40 3.01 49 8 0.60 75 52 3.91 24 8 0.60 50 19 1.43 1329 25 51 3.84 51 9 0.68 26 7 0.53 52 7 0.53
63
4.1.2.5 Egg Weight
The mean egg weight for Nera black hens was 63.08 ±0.71 (P<0.05) and ranged from 44 –
91g (Table 14). Eggs laid in the morning hours were significantly (P<0.05) heavier than those
laid later in the day. The difference in mean egg weight (P<0.05) between eggs laid from
0600h to 0700h and those laid from 1500h to 1800h was 17.44g
64
Table 14: Effect of oviposition interval on egg weight of Nera black hens
Oviposition time interval Egg weight (g) Sig.
6.00am-6.59am 70.10±0.92a *
7.00am-7.59am 69.46±0.71ab *
8.00am-8.59am 68.51±0.72ab *
9.00am-9.59am 67.94±0.64bc *
10.00am-10.59am 66.21±0.55c *
11.00am-11.59am 63.79±0.64d *
12.00pm-12.59pm 59.79±0.51e *
1.00pm-1.59pm 57.39±0.47f *
2.00pm-2.59pm 54.97±0.58g *
3.00pm-6.00pm 52.66±0.71h *
Overall mean 63.08±0.71
a,b,c,d,e, f, g,h: Mean values in a column with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05); *=(p<0.05)
65
4.1.2.6 Intensity/ Rate of lay
In the 56 days used to appraise the laying characteristics of Nera Black hens, the 75 hens laid
2871 eggs, giving overall production rate of 68.36% (Table 10). Good layers laid 2301 eggs
representing 80.15% of eggs laid, intermediate layers laid 510 eggs accounting for 17.76% and
poor layers laid 60 eggs or 2.09% of the eggs laid.
66
4.1.2.7 Hen housed egg production (HHEP):
The mean number of eggs produced by each hen for the period of the study was 46.02 eggs
for good layers, 31.88 eggs for intermediate layers and 6.67 eggs for poor layers (Tables 9 and
10). For the 75 Nera black hens altogether, the mean number of eggs produced by each hen
was 38.28 eggs during the 56 days of the study.
4.1.2.8 Hen day egg production (HDEP):
The mean number of eggs laid daily by good layers was 41.09 eggs, intermediate and poor
layers 9.12 and 1.07, eggs respectively (Tables 9 and 10). The general mean was 51.27 eggs
daily.
67
Table 15: Comparison between strains for performance and egg quality traits Parameter
Strain Mean±SE P value Sig.
Hen day egg production Shaver brown 49.82±0.85 0.025 *
Nera black 50.29±0.68
Average daily feed
intake (g)
Shaver brown 59.94±0.40 0.00 *
Nera black 78.73±1.12
Egg weight (g) Shaver brown 64.46±0.30 1.58 NS
Nera black 64.08±0.48
Egg shell weight (g) Shaver brown 8.06±0.01 0.00 *
Nera black 7.94±0.01
Egg shell thickness
(mm)
Shaver brown 0.23±0.02 0.001 *
Nera black 0.21±0.02
Egg shape index Shaver brown 1.41±0.003 0.00 *
Nera black 1.45±0.002
Albumin height (mm) Shaver brown 7.15±0.32 0.00 *
Nera black 8.02±0.12
Albumin index Shaver brown 0.11±0.0004 0.007 * Nera black 0.11±0.0005
Yolk height (mm) Shaver brown 18.62±0.02 0.00 *
Nera black 18.36±0.01
Yolk index Shaver brown 0.62±0.01 0.00 *
Nera black 0.61±0.005
Haugh unit Shaver brown 83.08±0.18 0.001 *
Nera black 88.43±0.16
*= (p<0.05); NS= Not Significant
68
69
Table 16: Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown hens PARAMETERS 1
24.500C 2 24.700C
3 24.900C
4 25.000C
5 25.200C
6 25.700C
Overall mean±SE
Sig.
Hen day egg production
56.43±1.63a 50.57±1.53ab 48.71±2.44b 47.71±1.54b 47.43±1.69b 46.57±2.06b 49.82±0.85 *
Average daily feed intake (g)
62.85±0.70a 60.99±0.50ab 58.98±0.68b 60.89±0.77ab 58.75±0.96b 55.13±0.68c 59.94±0.40 *
Egg weight (g)
66.16±1.83 64.40±0.65 64.73±0.64 63.07±0.80 62.98±1.86 64.26±1.56 64.30±0.46 NS
Egg shell weight (g)
8.10±0.01a 8.07±0.004ab 8.06±0.01ab 8.03±0.01b 8.05±0.01ab 8.07±0.05ab 8.06±0.01 *
Egg shell thickness (mm)
0.24±0.004 0.23±0.004 0.24±0.01 0.24±0.02 0.22±0.01 0.24±0.07 0.23±0.03 NS
Egg shape index
1.45±0.01ab 1.46±0.01a 1.45±0.01ab 1.43±0.11bc 1.42±0.01c 1.43±0.01bc 1.44±0.003 *
Albumin height (mm)
7.71±0.06a 7.28±0.04b 7.09±0.06bc 6.99±0.10cd 6.85±0.07de 6.75±0.12e 7.16±0.05 *
Albumin index
0.11±0.00 0.11±0.001 0.11±0.00 0.11±0.00 0.11±0.00 0.11±0.002 0.11±0.001 NS
yolk height (mm)
18.91±0.01a 18.68±0.04b 18.68±0.03b 18.60±0.01b 18.33±0.05c 18.41±0.03c 18.62±0.03 *
Yolk index
0.60±0.001c 0.61±0.002c 0.62±0.004ab 0.63±0.003a 0.62±0.003b 0.62±0.001b 0.61±0.002 *
Haugh unit
86.46±0.15a 83.75±0.24b 82.72±0.05b 82.55±0.10b 81.18±0.11c 81.17±0.37c 83.17±0.24 *
a,b,c,d,e: Mean values in a row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05)
*= (p<0.05); NS= Not Significant
70
Table 17: Effect of temperature on performance of Nera black hens PARAMETERS 1
24.500C 2 24.700C
3 24.900C
4 25.000C
5 25.200C
6 25.700C
7 27.400C
Overal Mean±SE
Sig.
Hen day egg production
56.71±2.18a 52.36±1.01bc 50.00±1.56bc 48.86±1.10c 48.29±1.32c 47.86±1.50c 54.00±1.22ab 51.30±0.63 *
Average daily feed intake (g)
91.25±1.13a 82.90±1.75b 78.71±1.75bc 78.42±1.14bc 76.25±1.31c 70.70±1.03d 82.59±1.02b 80.47±0.94 *
Egg weight (g)
65.36±1.22a 63.64±0.61ab 63.78±2.15ab 60.90±1.92b 64.07±0.75ab 62.78±1.16ab 66.22±1.77a 63.80±0.52 *
Egg shell weight (g)
8.09±0.001a 8.02±0.02ab 7.97±0.03b 7.96±0.02b 7.79±0.02c 7.73±0.03d 8.02±o.01ab 7.95±0.02 *
Egg shell thickness (mm)
0.23±0.004a 0.22±0.005abc 0.21±0.004bc 0.21±0.004abc 0.21±0.003bc 0.20±0.003c 0.22±0.01ab 0.21±0.002 *
Egg shape index
1.46±0.002a 1.46±0.001a 1.45±0.002b 1.45±0.002b 1.44±0.002c 1.42±0.002d 1.46±0.00a 1.46±0.002 *
Albumin height (mm)
8.30±0.004a 8.15±0.03b 8.02±0.01c 8.02±0.01c 7.77±0.01d 7.75±0.07d 8.15±0.006b 8.04±0.03 *
Albumin index
0.11±0.00b 0.11±0.00c 0.11±0.00c 0.11±0.00c 0.12±0.00a 0.12±0.00a 0.11±0.00c 0.11±0.004 *
yolk height (mm)
18.51±0.01a 18.46±0.01b 18.31±0.01d 18.31±0.01d 18.30±0.01d 18.25±0.01e 18.41±0.01c 18.38±0.01 *
Yolk index
0.60±0.002bc 0.60±0.001d 0.61±0.002ab 0.61±0.00a 0.61±0.001ab 0.61±0.00a 0.60±0.02d 0.61±0.002 *
Haugh unit
89.03±1.80a 88.38±0.21ab 87.21±0.34cd 87.62±0.39abc 88.68±0.49d 86.19±0.61e 88.04±0.22bc 87.69±0.16 *
a,b,c,d,e: Mean values in a row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05). *= (p<0.05); NS= Not Significant
71
4.1.3 Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens
The effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens are shown in
Tables 16 and 17.
Average daily feed intake (ADFI)
The Average daily feed intake (ADFI) was reduced (P<0.05) in proportion to the severity of
heat stress exposure for Shaver brown and Nera black hens. For Shaver brown hens, ADFI
decreased significantly (P<0.05) from 62.85g ±1.83 to 55.13g ±0.68 as the temperature
increased from 24.500C to 25.70
0C. For Nera black hens, ADFI decreased significantly
(P<0.05) as temperature increased from 24.500C to 27.40
0C. Their ADFI ranged from 70.70g
±1.03 to 91.25g ±1.13.
Hen day egg production (HDEP)
The Hen day egg production (HDEP) was inversely related to high temperature. As the
temperature increased from 24.500C to 25.70
0C for Shaver brown hens, HDEP significantly
decreased (P<0.05). Similarly, HDEP significantly decreased (P<0.05) with increasing
temperatures, although this was not the case at 27.400C.
Egg weight
Exposure of Shaver brown hens to high temperatures resulted in a decrease in egg weight
(P>0.05), although the differences were not significant (P>0.05). Mean egg weights ranged
from 62.98g ±1.86 to 66.16g ±1.83 within temperature range of 24.500C to 25.70
0C. For Nera
black hens (Table 21) , temperatures significantly (P<0.05) affected egg weight. Mean egg
weights ranged from 60.90g ±1.92 to 66.22g ±1.77.
Egg shell thickness
Although Egg shell thickness was not significantly decreased (P>0.05) by temperature for
Shaver brown hens, egg shell thickness for Nera black hens decreased significantly (P<0.05)
with increasing temperatures.
Haugh unit
Haugh unit of Shaver brown hens significantly decreased (P<0.05) from 86.46g ±0.15 to
81.17g ±0.37 as the temperature increased. They had significantly higher (P<0.05) Haugh units
at 24.500C while it was lowest at 25.70
0C. Nera black hens had significantly (P<0.05) higher
Haugh units at low temperatures than at high temperatures. Haugh units of 89.03g ±1.80 was
observed at 24.500C, while Haugh units of 88.04g ±0.22 was observed at 27.40
0C.
72
Table 18: Interaction of strain and temperature on performance 24.700C 24.900C 25.000C 25.700C P
value
Sig.
Parameter Strain
Hen day egg production
Shaver Brown
50.57±1.13 48.71±1.96 47.71±1.96 46.56±1.96 1.00 NS
Nera Black
52.36±1.39 50.00±1.96 48.86±1.96 47.86±1.96
Average daily feed intake (g)
Shaver Brown
60.99±0.77a 58.98±1.34a 60.89±1.34a 55.13±1.34b 0.03 *
Nera Black
82.91±0.95a 78.71±1.34b 78.42±1.34b 70.70±1.34c
Egg weight (g)
Shaver Brown
64.40±0.80 64.73±1.38 63.07±1.38 64.26±1.38 0.94 NS
Nera Black
63.64±0.98 63.78±1.38 60.90±1.38 62.78±1.38
Egg shell weight (g)
Shaver Brown
8.07±0.13 8.06±0.02 8.03±0.02 8.07±0.02 0.00 NS
Nera Black
8.02±0.16a 7.97±0.02ab 7.96±0.02ab 7.73±0.02b
Egg shell thickness (g)
Shaver Brown
0.23±0.01 0.24±0.01 0.24±0.01 0.24±0.01 0.35 NS
Nera
Black
0.22±0.01 0.21±0.01 0.21±0.01 0.20±0.01
Egg shape index
Shaver Brown
1.46±0.004 1.45±0.01 1.43±0.01 1.43±0.01 0.04 NS
Nera Black
1.46±0.01a 1.45±0.01ab 1.45±0.01ab 1.42±0.01b
Albumin height (mm)
Shaver Brown
7.28±0.04 7.09±0.07 6.99±0.07 6.75±0.07 0.42 NS
Nera Black
8.15±0.05 8.02±0.07 8.02±0.07 7.75±0.07
Albumin index
Shaver Brown
0.11±0.001 0.11±0.001 0.11±0.001 0.11±0.001 0.00 NS
Nera Black
0.11±0.001a 0.11±0.001a 0.11±0.001a 0.11±0.001b
Yolk height
(mm)
Shaver
Brown
18.68±0.02a 18.68±0.04a 18.60±0.04a 18.41±0.04b 0.03 *
Nera Black
18.46±0.03a 18.31±0.04b 18.31±0.04b 18.25±0.04b
Yolk index
Shaver Brown
0.61±0.001b 0.62±0.002ab 0.63±0.002a 0.62±0.002ab 0.00 NS
Nera Black
0.61±0.002 0.61±0.002 0.61±0.002 0.62±0.002
Haugh unit
Shaver Brown
83.75±0.20 82.72±0.34 82.55±0.34 81.17±0.34 0.76 NS
Nera Black
88.38±0.24 87.21±0.34 87.62±0.34 86.19±0.34
a,b: Mean values in a row with different superscripts are significantly different (p<0.05). NS= Not
significant
73
4.1.4 Interaction of strain and temperature on performance
As shown in Table 18, significant interaction (P<0.05) between strain and temperature on
average daily feed intake (ADFI) was observed. ADFI decreased significantly (P<0.05) as the
temperature increased from 24.700C - 25.70
0C. There was no significant interaction (P>0.05)
between strain and temperature on hen day egg production. As the temperature linearly
increased from 24.700C - 25.70
0C, hen day egg production decreased. There was no significant
interaction (P>0.05) between strain and temperature on egg weight. Mean egg weights
(P>0.05) of 64.40g±0.80, 64.73g±1.38, 67.07g±1.38, and 64.26g±1.38 were obtained under
temperatures of 24.700C, 24.90
0C, 25.00
0C, and 25.70
0C respectively for shaver brown hens,
while mean egg weights (P>0.05) of 63.64g±0.98, 63.78g±1.38, 60.90g±1.38 and 62.78g±1.38
were obtained under the same temperature ranges. No significant interaction (P>0.05) between
strain and temperature on egg shell weight was observed. Mean egg shell weights ranged from
8.03g to 8.07g for Shaver brown hens while Nera black hens had egg shell weights (P>0.05)
that ranged from 7.73g to 8.02g. However, Nera black hens had a significant (P<0.05) strain
effect on egg shell weight, which was significantly (P<0.05) lower than that of the Shaver
brown hens. No significant interaction (P>0.05) was observed between strain and temperature
on egg shell thickness, egg shape index, albumin index and yolk index, while significant
interaction (P<0.05) was observed between strain and temperature on yolk height.
4.1.5 Physical Characteristics of hens
As shown in Table 9, Good layers had bright eyes and combs, bleached beaks and shanks,
flexible pubic bones, worn feathers, moist and enlarged vent, soft and pliable abdomen, soft
and smooth wattles. Intermediate layers’ heads, combs, eyes, wattles, abdomen and vent were
nearly the same with good layers except that the beaks, eye rings and shanks showed some
degree of bleaching. On the condition of the plumage, feathers were fairly worn. The pubic
bones were fairly flexible. For poor layers, their combs were dry and shriveled, eyes dull and
eye rings tinted, dull heads, dry wattles but the beak and shank did not show yellow
pigmentation. The feathers were new, abdomen fairly soft, vent fairly moist and pubic bones
relatively close together. For Shaver brown hens, good layers were made up of 42 hens;
intermediate layers, 28 hens, and poor layers, 5 hens. For Nera black hens, good layers were
made up of 50 hens, intermediate layers, 16 hens and poor layers, 9 hens.
74
4.1.6 Comparative performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens.
Table 15 shows the comparative performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens
Hen day egg production (HDEP)
Nera black hens had mean hen day egg production of 50.29±0.68 which was significantly
higher (P<0.05) than that (49.82±0.85) of Shaver brown hens.
Average daily feed intake (ADFI)
The average daily feed intake (ADFI) for Nera black hens was 78.73g±1.12 and this was
significantly higher (P<0.05) than the ADFI (59.94g±0.40) of Shaver brown hens.
Egg weight
There was no significant (P>0.05) difference in egg weight between the two strains. Shaver
brown hens had mean egg weight of 64.46g±0.30 while Nera black hens had mean egg weight
of 64.08g±0.48.
Egg shell weight
The egg shell weight (8.06g±0.01) of Shaver brown hens was significantly higher (P<0.05)
than the egg shell weight (7.94g±0.01) of Nera black hens.
Egg shell thickness
Shaver brown hens had significantly higher (P<0.05) egg shell thickness (0.23mm±0.02) than
Nera black hens which had egg shell thickness of 0.21mm±0.02.
Egg shape index (ESI)
Nera black hens had significantly higher (P<0.05) egg shape index of 1.45±0.002 than Shaver
brown hens with egg shape index of 1.41±0.003
Albumin height and albumin index
The albumin height (8.02mm±0.12) of Nera black hens was significantly different (P<0.05)
from that (7.15mm±0.02) of Shaver brown hens. Likewise, the albumin index (0.11±0.0005) of
75
Nera black hens was significantly different (P<0.05) from the albumin index (0.11±0.0004)
of Shaver brown hens
Yolk height and yolk index
Shaver brown hens had yolk height of 18.62mm±0.02 and this was significantly higher
(P<0.05) than the yolk height (18.36mm±0.01) of Nera black hens. Similarly, Shaver brown
hens had yolk index of 0.62±0.01 and this was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that
(0.61±0.005) of Nera black hens.
Haugh unit
Nera black hens had significantly higher (P<0.05) Haugh units of 88.43±0.16 than Shaver
brown which had yolk index of 0.62±0.01.
76
4.2 Discussion
4.2.1 Climatic Data for Nsukka
Climatic data (Figure 1 and Table 2) for Nsukka during the study were similar to the climatic
data given by Egbunike (2002) who reported monthly minimum temperature range from
18.000C to 24.00
0C, maximum temperatures from 32.25
0C to 38.00
0C and relative humidity
from 46.90 to 81.40% in the humid tropics. It is also consistent with the findings of Mardsen
and Morris (1981) and Payne (1990) who noted that in the tropics, egg production can be
efficient at ambient temperatures as high as 320C but not when temperatures rises above 35
0C
for sustained periods. Relative humidity appeared to have no effect on egg laying performance
at ambient temperatures below 270C although it might have affected performance at higher
temperatures. In practice in the tropics, layers would normally be managed at a somewhat
lower average temperature than 320C.
5.2 Egg Laying Characteristics of Shaver brown and Nera black hens
5.2.1 Oviposition time
Although most eggs were laid before late morning hours (Tables 7 and 14), there was great
variation in the oviposition (egg laying) time. This observation is in agreement with the
findings of Rose (1997), Orji and Nwakalor (1984), McNitt (1983), Ani and Nnamani (2011),
Ajaero and Ezekwe (2006). Rose (1997) reported that domestic fowls lay most of their eggs in
the morning hours. McNitt (1983) also noted that 70% of hens lay their eggs within the first
five hours after day light and 90% within seven hours. Orji and Nwakalor (1984) reported that
Hypeco Goldline and Shaver Brown hens laid 76 and 71 percent of their eggs before 12 noon
respectively. This observations are however, at variance with the findings of Nys and Morgan
(1981) who reported that ovipositions were distributed virtually at random throughout the day.
The disparity could be as a result of differences in the photoperiod of the different study
locations. The birds the earlier researchers worked with could have received less natural light
within the range of time given compared with the amount of day light the birds in the present
study were exposed to in South-East Nigeria. Besides, breed of bird, nutrition, age and weight
of bird, level of production, management system and environmental temperature, laying is also
much affected by season, especially day length (Ahmad et al., 1974; Oluyemi and Roberts,
2000). The sharp decline in the number of eggs produced after 4pm could be as a result of the
77
fact that oviposition rarely occurs after 3.00 pm (Ani and Nnamani, 2011; Ajaero and
Ezekwe, 2006). Smith (2001) reported that chickens do not normally lay eggs in the late
afternoon and therefore once the egg laying is delayed beyond mid-day, oviposition is delayed
until the following day. This assertion is in agreement with the low output of eggs observed
during the afternoon hours in the present study.
5.2.2 Total Egg Production and Other Egg Production Indices
From the results, 2,790 eggs were laid by the 75 Shaver Brown hens for the period of 56 days
with a percentage egg production of 66.43%. The high percentage showed that Shaver brown
hens have adapted favourably to the tropical environment, hence their ability to achieve high
level of egg production. The hen- housed egg production showed that the average number of
eggs laid by each hen for the period of experiment was 37.20 eggs. From hen day egg
production, it was noted that 49.82 eggs were laid daily by the 75 Shaver brown hens. For the
75 hens, the mean egg number per hen would be 298.92 eggs per annum. For Nera black hens,
2871 eggs were laid by the 75 Nera black hens for the period of 56 days with a percentage egg
production of 68.38%. The high percentage showed that Nera black hens have adapted
favourably to the tropical environment, hence their ability to achieve high level of production.
The hen housed egg production showed that the average number of eggs laid by each hen for
the period of the experiment was 38.28. From hen day egg production, it was noted that 51.27
eggs were laid by the 75 Nera black hens. For the 75 hens, the mean number of eggs per hen
would be 307.62 egg per annum .This result is consistent with findings of Nwosu and Omeje
(1985) which showed that the exotic hens are capable of laying 240 to 270 eggs per annum
under tropical environment.
5.2.3 Clutch Length
Shaver brown and Nera black hens used for this experiment laid their eggs in
clutches or sequences which varied from 1 to 17. Hens which had longer clutches had on the
whole larger total egg production. This is consistent with the findings of Ani and Nnamani
(2011) who observed that hens with the longest clutches would produce the largest number of
eggs each laying year because they have the fewest number of non-productive days. The
differences recorded in the clutches of the experimental hens might be due to varying rates of
follicular maturation. Robinson and Renema (1999b) reported that hens that have slow rate of
follicular maturation (26-28h or more) lay shorter (2-3 days) sequences or clutches. On the
other hand, hens that lay very long sequences typically have maturation rates of 24h or perhaps
78
less. It could also be due to heredity or environmental condition (Samak, 2001). Similar
reports have been given by Jakowski and Kaufman (2004) and Etches (1996).
5.2.4 Pause days
Good layers had lower number of pause days while poor layers had highest number
of pause days (Tables 6, 9 and 13). This is in agreement with Jakowski and Kaufman (2004)
who reported that a prolific hen lays five or more eggs in a clutch, the clutches being separated
by not more than a day of rest. Data from the study show that pause days of laying hens
occurred more frequently following oviposition in the afternoon than in the morning hours.
This corroborates with Smith (2001) who reported that chickens do not normally lay eggs in
the afternoon and therefore once egg is delayed beyond mid-day, oviposition is delayed until
the next day. It was also observed that when oviposition occurred after 3pm, hens tended to
pause the next day and following the pause, they would then return to early morning
oviposition earlier than their contemporaries which laid the previous day. It does seem that
there is an inverse relationship between oviposition time and clutch length. Thus, oviposition
interval was found to decrease as clutch length increased and vice versa. Similarly, oviposition
lag decreased as clutch length increased and the lag became negative with long sequence.
5.2.5 Egg Weight
The mean egg weights (P<0.05) of 63.43g ±0.75 and 63.08g±0.71 for Shaver brown
and Nera black hens (Tables 7 and 14), respectively are in conformity with the findings of Orji
and Nwakalor (1984) who reported mean egg weights of 62.83g and 68.81g for Hypeco
Goldline and Shaver Black hens, respectively at Nsukka. It is however, at variance with the
findings of Reddy et al. (2004) and Omeje (1983). Reddy et al. (2004) noted that mature egg
weight generally varied from 55-58gms while Omeje (1983) reported mean egg weight of
59.4g for Goldlink hens at Nsukka. The variation in egg weight might be due to breed or strain
(Nwosu, et al. 1987); position of eggs in a clutch and oviposition time (Ajaero and Ezekwe,
2006); nutrition and ambient temperature (Abutu and Ugwu, 2005); age (Bennett, 2004);
drugs, water quality, intestinal pH (Poultry Hub, 2010).
The heaviest eggs were produced early in the morning and the egg weights
decreased (P<0.05) with the length of clutch (Tables 5 and 12). This report is consistent with
the findings of Novo et al. (1997) and Robinson et al. (1991) that in a clutch, weights of early
laid eggs were greater than those of subsequent eggs in the same clutch. Etches (1996) also
79
noted that because yolk size affects egg size, first eggs in a sequence are invariably heavier
than subsequent eggs of a sequence.
Robinson and Renema (1999a) noted that ovulation follows oviposition by a period
of about 15-45 minutes. When a hen lays an egg late in the afternoon, many hours after the first
egg of a clutch was laid, the hen does not ovulate soon after oviposition because it is too late as
she has exceeded the time limit of her open period of luteinizing hormone (LH). She will
therefore not lay an egg the next day (pause day). The hen will hold the mature F1 follicles
overnight and ovulate it at the start of the next open period for LH release. This means that the
hen will lay early in the day and a new clutch will begin. This probably explains why hens that
have long clutches do so well as they do not take many pause days.
The mean egg weight difference (P<0.05) of 11.10g and 11.47g (Tables 7 and 14)
for Shaver brown and Nera black hens respectively, between the morning eggs and afternoon
eggs conforms to the findings of Zakaria et al. (2005) that egg weight of early laid eggs were
significantly greater than late laid eggs.
5.3 Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown and Nera black hens
Average daily feed intake (ADFI)
As shown in Tables 16 and 17, the significant decrease (P<0.05) in average daily feed intake
(ADFI) with increasing temperatures for Shaver brown and Nera black hens is consistent with
the findings of and Muiruri and Harrison (1991), McKee, et al. (1997), Scott and Balnave
(1998), Kirunda et al. (2001) and Mashaly et al. (2004) which showed reduced feed intake
under varying degrees of heat exposure. Similar results have been reported by Picard (1985)
and Emery et al. (1984) who stated that the primary effect of high temperature stress on laying
performance was exerted through reduced feed consumption. The decrease in ADFI could be
due to reduced apetite associated with reduced performance at high temperatures. This result
however, is at variance with the findings of Koelkebeck et al. (1998) who indicated that acute
heat stress had no effect on feed intake in laying hens. The reason could be due to magnitude
of exposure to heat stress.
Hen day egg production (HDEP)
The significant decrease (P<0.05) in hen day egg production (Tables 16 and 17) corroborates
the findings of Muiruri and Harrison (1991) and Whitehead et al. (1998) that hen day egg
production in white leghorn hens decreased when they were exposed to high environmental
80
temperature. The decrease in egg production could be due to decrease in feed consumption
with the resultant reduction in the available nutrients for egg production.
Egg weight
For Shaver brown hens, increasing temperatures had no significant effect (P>0.05) on egg
weight (Table 16). Similar observations were made by Muiruri and Harrison (1991),
Wolfenson et al. (1979) who reported that heat stress did not significantly affect egg weights.
This may be due to the type of strains used and prevailing environmental temperature.
Egg weights of Nera black hens (Table 17) were significantly (P<0.05) decreased with
increasing temperatures. This is in line with the findings of De Andrade et al. (1976,1977),
Emery et al. (1984), Balnave and Muheerza (1997), Kirunda et al. (2001) and Ahmad and
Roland (2003) that either high temperature or cyclic temperatures decreased egg weight. Their
findings could be due to reduction in feed consumption as reported by De Andrade (1976).
Egg shell weight
As shown in Tables 16 and 17, egg shell weight significantly decreased (P<0.05) with
increasing temperature. This results supports earlier investigations by Emery et al. (1984),
Mahmoud et al. (1996), Asli et al. (2007) and Ajakaiye et al. (2011) which showed decreased
egg shell weight under high temperature. The reason could be due to decreased plasma protein
concentration (Zhou et al., 1998), plasma calcium concentration (Mahmoud et al., 1996), both
of which are required for egg shell formation. In addition, it has been shown that calcium use
(Odom et al., 1986) and calcium uptake by duodenal epithelial cells (Mahmoud et al., 1996)
are decreased by exposure to high environmental temperature. It has also been reported that
plasma calcium level was significantly decreased in laying hens (Mahmoud et al., 1996) and in
turkeys (Kohne and Johnes, 1976) when birds were exposed to high temperatures.
Also, high temperature could prevent the reproductive tract of laying hens from probably
getting enough nutrient supply as a result of low blood supply and therefore reducing nutrients
reaching the reproductive tract for normal egg formation (Ezekwe, 2011). This result however
contrasts the findings of Wolfenson et al. (1979) who noted that heat exposure did no
significantly affect egg shell weight. This could be due to small temperature range the hens
were subjected to during the experiment and perhaps due to the genetic makeup of individual
strains.
81
Egg shell thickness
As shown in Table 16 for Shaver brown hens, increasing temperatures did not significantly
(P>0.05) affect egg shell thickness. This is in line with the findings of Muiruri and Harrison
(1991) that high temperature did not significantly affect shell thickness. This presumably could
be as a result of variation in temperatures of the different study locations. For Nera black hens
(Table 17), there was a significant decrease (P<0.05) in egg shell thickness with increasing
temperatures. This supports the findings of Emery et al. (1984) and Mahmoud et al. (1996)
that there was decrease in egg shell weights of heat stressed birds. This could be as a result of
reduction in feed consumption associated with heat stress as reported by Andrade (1976).
Haugh unit
The Haugh unit (Tables 16 and 17) was significantly (P<0.05) higher for Shaver brown and
Nera black hens under low temperatures but significantly decreased (P<0.05) with increasing
temperatures. This supports the findings of Kirunda et al. (2001) that Haugh units of eggs from
heat stressed birds were reduced after heat exposure. This disagrees with the findings of
Mashaly et al. (2004) who reported significantly higher Haugh units in eggs of birds exposed
to high temperatures. This could be as a result of varying degrees of heat exposure in the
different study locations.
5.4 Interaction of strain and temperature on performance
Average daily feed intake (ADFI)
As shown in Table 18, the significant interaction (P<0.05) between strain and temperature on
ADFI is consistent with the findings of Mashaly et al. (2004), Kirunda et al. (2001), Scott and
Balnave (1998), McKee et al. (1997) and Muiruri and Harrison (1991) which showed reduced
feed intake under varying degrees of heat exposure. Similar results have been reported by
Picard (1985) and Emery et al. (1984) who stated that the primary effect of high temperature
stress on laying performance is exerted through reduced feed consumption. The decrease in
ADFI could be as a result of reduced appetite associated high temperatures. This result
however, is at variance with the findings of Koelkebeck et al. (1998) that acute heat stress had
no effect on feed intake in laying hens. This could be due to differences in environmental
temperature and strain of birds used.
82
Hen day egg production (HDEP)
As shown in Table 18, there were no significant interaction (P>0.05) between strain and
temperature on hen day egg production. This corroborates investigations carried out by
Mardsen et al. (1987) and Emery et al. (1984). Mardsen et al. (1987) reported increased egg
production rate by 1.1% on pullets exposed to temperatures of 180C-24
0C. This could be due to
small variation in temperature range (24.700C-25.70
0C) and different strains of birds used.
These findings, however contrasts the reports of Whitehead et al. (1998), Muiruri and Harrison
(1991) that hen day egg production in white leghorn hens decreased when they were exposed
to high environmental temperature. Perhaps, it could be that the environmental temperatures
the hens were subjected to in the present study were not high enough to have led to decrease in
HDEP.
Egg weight
Table 18 shows that there were no significant interactions (P>0.05) between strain and
temperature on egg weight. Similar observations were made by Muiruri and Harrison (1991)
and Wolfenson et al. (1979) who stated that heat stress did not significantly affect egg
weights. This may be due to the type of strains used, cyclic temperatures and age of the hen.
This is however inconsistent with the findings of Emery et al. (1984), De Andrade et al.
(1976,1977), Balnave and Muheerza (1997), Kirunda et al. (2001) and Ahmad and Roland
(2003) that either high temperature or cyclic temperatures decrease egg weight. Their findings
could be due to reduction in feed consumption as reported by (De Andrade, 1976).
Egg shell weight
As shown in Table 18, no significant interactions (P>0.05) between strain and temperature on
egg shell weight were observed. This supports the findings of Wolfenson et al. (1979) who
noted that heat exposure did not significantly affect egg shell weight. This could be that the
temperature the hens were subjected to during the experiment was not too high as to have
affected egg shell weigh. However, Nera black hens had a significant (P<0.05) strain effect on
egg shell weight which was lower than that Shaver brown hens. This result supports earlier
reports by Emery et al. (1984), Mahmoud et al. (1996), Asli et al. (2007) and Ajakaiye et al.
(2011) which showed decreased egg shell weight under high temperature. The reason could be
83
due to decreased plasma protein concentration (Zhou et al., 1998) and plasma calcium
concentration (Mahmoud et al., 1996), both of which are required for egg shell formation. It
has also been shown that calcium use and calcium uptake by duodenal epithelial cells are
decreased by exposure to high environmental temperature (Odom et al. 1986; Mahmoud et al.
1996). It has also been reported that plasma calcium level was significantly decreased in laying
hens (Mahmoud et al. 1996) and in turkeys (Kohne and Johnes, 1976) when birds were
exposed to high temperatures. Also, high temperature could prevent the reproductive tract of
laying hens from probably getting enough nutrient supply as a result of low blood supply and
therefore reducing nutrients reaching the reproductive tract for normal egg formation (Ezekwe,
2011).
Egg shell thickness
It was observed (Table 18) that there were no significant interaction (P>0.05) between strain
and temperature on egg shell thickness. This is in line with the findings of Muiruri and
Harrison (1991) that high temperature did not affect egg shell thickness. This presumably
could be because of strain differences. This however, contrasts the findings of Emery et al.
(1984) and Mahmoud et al. (1996). This could be due to differences in degree of exposure to
heat stress or strain of birds used. Similar observation was made by Andrade (1976)
Haugh Unit
As shown in Table 18, there were no significant interactions (P>0.05) between strain and
temperature on Haugh unit. This supports the findings of Kirunda et al. (2001) who reported
that Haugh units of eggs from heat stressed birds were reduced after heat exposure. This
disagrees with the findings of Mashaly et al. (2004) who reported significantly higher Haugh
units from eggs of birds in hot chamber. This could be as a result of variation in temperatures
of the different study locations.
5.5 Physical Characteristics
Results from the physical characteristics agreed with the reports of Obioha (1992), Gillespie
(1997), Daghir (2008), Ani and Nnamani (2011) and Ajaero and Ezekwe (2006) that laying
hens had large, bright red, soft and waxy combs and wattles; bright and prominent eyes;
84
bleached beaks, eyelids and eyerings; flexible rigid bones; soft and pliable abdomen; moist
and enlarged vent.
Based on the number of eggs produced, number of pause days and physical
characteristics, the hens were classified into good layers, intermediate layers and poor layers
(Table 9). For Shaver brown hens, good layers were those that produced 38-56 eggs for 56
days, had mean clutch length of 1.32 and pause days of 5-18. For Nera black hens, good layers
produced 38-56 eggs, had mean clutch length of 1.45 and pause days of 2-17. They also had
the following physical characteristics: full, plump, smooth and waxy comb; prominent, soft
and smooth wattles; bright eyes, bright red face, beak, eyering, earlobe and vent(cloaca), as
well as white or bleached shanks. Their vents were white or well bleached, large, soft, moist,
oval and sometimes overhanging; the pubic bones were thin, pliable and relatively wide apart
to accommodate about two or more fingers within the inter-pubic space as described by
Oluyemi and Roberts (2000), Ajaero and Ezekwe (2006) and Daghir (2008).
Intermediate layers for Shaver brown hens produced 19-37 eggs, mean clutch
length of 2.67 and pause days of 19-37. For Nera black hens, intermediate layers produced 19-
37 eggs, had mean clutch length of 3.45, and pause days of 19-35. Their physical
characteristics such as combs, wattles, eyes and abdomen were same as seen in good layers.
The beak showed some degree of bleaching. The lateral side of the beak was bleached or white
(fully bleached). The caudo-cranial part (base) was bleached or white (fully bleached) while
the tip was white. The shanks showed some degree of bleaching. The region of the meta-tarsal
joint and some parts of the toes were yellow. The dorsal part (back) and lateral part were white.
The frontal aspect-the region above the meta-tarsal joint and the hock joint were white.
Besides, the eyelids, eye ring and earlobe were bleached. They had moist, enlarged, dilated,
bleached and pliable cloaca when compared with poor layers and moist, bleached, pliable,
intermediately enlarged and dilated cloaca when compared with good layers. Their feathers
were worn, soiled and scruffy as in good layers. Moreover, the pubic bones were soft, thin and
relatively wide apart, while the face was bright. Just like good layers, the intermediate layers
were relatively active, alert and well-fed. The observed features were similar to the features
described by Smith (2001) and Ani and Nnamani (2011). For Shaver brown hens, poor
layers were classified based on the fact that for Shaver brown hens they produced 0-18 eggs in
56 days, and they had mean clutch length of 5.94 and pause days of 49-55. For Nera black
hens, poor layers produced 0-18 eggs, had mean clutch length of 7.08 and pause days of 40-
85
56. They had the following physical characteristics: combs were shriveled, dry and covered
with white scales; eyes were dull; wattles were rough and dry; face was yellowish; abdomen
was tight, hard and tucked up with the rear end of keel; the pubic bones were very close and
could not accommodate about two or more fingers within the inter-pubic space as described by
Obioha (1992), Oluyemi and Roberts (2000) and Ani and Nnamani (2011). Unlike in good and
intermediate layers where the abdomen was loose, pliable, soft and full when in laying
condition, the pubic bones were rigid, thick, blunt and relatively close together. Moreover, the
beak was yellow at the base, tip and sides, whereas the vent (cloaca) was yellow or tinted,
small, hard, dry, round and sometimes appeared contracted.
5.6 Comparative performance and egg quality traits of Shaver brown and Nera black
hens
Hen day egg production (HDEP)
As shown in Table 15, hen day egg production was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Nera black
hens than Shaver brown hens. This result is in close agreement with those obtained by Goher et
al. (1994) and Nofal et al. (2000) who reported that hen day egg production of Mamourah
strains were significantly higher than that of Gimmizah strains. The reason could be as a result
of genetic differences between the strains. The result however disagrees with that reported by
Samak (2001) which showed that hen day egg production was not affected by the differences
in the strains of birds studied.
Average daily feed intake (ADFI)
As shown in Table 15, Shaver brown hens ate less (P<0.05) than Nera black hens, possibly
because of genetic differences, physical activity, physical condition, basal metabolic rate, body
temperature and body composition as reported by Nofal et al.( 2000) and Luiting ( 1990).
Egg weight
As shown in Table 15, strain differences had no significant effect (P>0.05) on egg weight. This
result supports the reports of Goher et al. (1994), Nofal et al. (2000) and Samak (2001) that
egg weight was not affected by strain. This result however disagrees with the findings of
Hanson (1991) and Abd-ElGalil (1993) which showed that significant differences in egg
weight existed between strains.
86
Egg shell weight and Egg shell thickness
As shown in Table 15, egg shell weight and egg shell thickness of Nera black hens were
significantly higher (P<0.05) than those of Shaver brown hens. This could be due to varying
egg shell quality associated with different types of strains of laying hens (Curtis et al., 1985).
Albumin and yolk height
Albumin heights of Nera black hens (Table 15) were significantly higher (P<0.05) than
albumin heights of Shaver brown hens. Similarly, yolk height of Shaver brown hens were
significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of Nera black hens. This could be due to genetic
differences between the two strains (Nofal et al., 2000; Luiting, 1990).
Haugh unit
The Haugh unit of Nera black hens (Table 15) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of
Shaver brown hens. This could be as a result of genetic differences between the strains
(Luiting, 1990; Nofal et al., 2000).
87
CHAPTER SIX
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
A study was conducted to evaluate the laying and physical characteristics of Shaver brown and
Nera black hens in the humid tropical environment. The results showed that Shaver Brown and
Nera black hens lay more eggs between 0600h and 1100h, but the peak laying period was
0700h to 0800h. Eggs laid in the first oviposition interval of 0600h to 0700h were bigger than
those laid in other oviposition intervals. The mean egg weight of the first eggs laid in a clutch
were the bigger than those of the subsequent eggs laid in a clutch. With egg production rate of
66.43% and 68.36% for Shaver brown and Nera black hens, respectively, the Shaver brown
hens and Nera black hens could lay 223.2 and 229.68 eggs, respectively in a year.
Comparatively, Shaver brown hens had higher egg weight, egg shell weight, egg shell
thickness, yolk height and yolk index than Nera black hens. Similarly, Nera black hens had
higher hen day egg production, average daily feed intake, egg shape index, albumin height, and
Haugh unit. The findings in this study tend to indicate that although heat stress had effect on
performance, Shaver brown and Nera black are good layers and are adapted to humid tropical
environment. This result could be helpful in establishing guidelines for temperature control in
laying houses, especially during hot season when birds are most susceptible to heat stress.
Conclusion
The results obtained in the present study show that although heat stress had effect on
performance, Shaver brown and Nera black hens are good layers and are adapted to humid
tropical environment.
88
References
Abd-El Galil, M.A.(1993). Evaluating the performance of some local breeds of chickens
under certain plains of nutrition. PhD. Minia Univ., Egypt.
Abeke, F.B., Sekoni, A., Abdulmalik, M. (1998). Effect of management system on
performance of laying hens. Proceedings of Silver Anniversary Conference, Nigerian
Society for Animal Production. Gateway Hotel Abeokuta. 21-26 March 1998, pp 538-
539.
Abutu, J.A and Ugwu, S.O.C. (2005). A comparison of the physical and biochemical
characteristics of table eggs laid by exotic and local hens. Unpub. PGD project.
Department of Animal Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Ahmad, H.A., Roland, Sr. D.A (2003). Effect of environmental temperature and total Sulfur
Amino acids on performance and profitability of laying hens: An economic approach. J.
Appl. Poult. Res: 12:476-482.
Ahmad, M.M., Mather, F.B., Gleaves, E.W. (1974). Effects of environmental temperatures
and dietary energy on dwarf and normal hens and normal roosters. Poult. Sci. J., 53:
929-935.
Ajaero, O.I and Ezekwe, A.G. (2006). The laying and physical characteristics of Shaver
brown hens in a hot humid environment. Agro-Sci. J. Agric, Food, Environ, Ext. 5:25-
32.
Ajakaiye, J.J., Cuesta-Mazorra, J., Garcia-Diaz, J.R. (2011). Vitamins C and E can
alleviate effects of heat stress on live weight and some egg quality profiles of laying
hens. Pak. Vet. J. 31(x): xxx.
Altan, O., Pabuccuaoglu, A., Konyalioglu, S., Bayrackter, H. (2003). Effect of heat stress
on oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and some stress parameters in broilers. Br. Poult.
Sci. 44(4):545-550.
Ani, A.O and Nnamani, M.E.(2011). The Physical and Laying Characteristics of Golden Sex-
Linked Hens under the Humid Tropical Environment. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10
(11): 1041-1047.
Ani, A.O and Okeke, G.C. (2011). The performance of broiler birds fed varying dietary levels
of roasted pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) seed meal. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 10
(11): 1036-1040.
Apantaku, S.O., Oloruntoba A., Fakoya, E.O. (2003). Farmers involvement in Agricultural
problems identification and prioritization in Ogun State Nigeria. South African Journal
of Agricultural Extension Volume 32, 45-59.
Asli, M.M., Hosseini, S.A., Lotfollahian, H., Shariatmadari, F. (2007). Effects of
Probiotics, Yeast, Vitamin E and Vitamin C supplements on performance and immune
89
response of laying hens during high environmental temperature. Int. j. Poult. Sci.
6(12): 895-900.
Austic, R.E and Nesheim, M.C. (1990). Poultry Production. 13th edition, Philadelphia, Lea
and Febiger.
Balnave, D. and Muheerza, S.K. (1997). Improving eggshell quality at high temperatures
with dietary sodium bicarbonate. Poult. Sci. 76: 558-593.
Bennett, C. (2004). Effect of egg size on shell thickness. Manitoba Agriculture, Food and
Rural Initiatives. Mitr. Update Vol. 14 No. 3.
Berardinelli, A., Giunchi, A., Guarnieri, A., Pezzi, F., Ragni, L. (2005). Shell egg albumen
height assessment by FT-NR spectroscopy. Transactions of the ASAE. 48(4): 1423-
1428.
BFREPA (2003). A day in the life of an egg. British Free Range Egg Producers Association.
Butcher, G.D. and Miles, R.D. (2000). Concepts of Eggshell Quality. Poultry Science Depart;
University of Florida, Gainsville.
Cassey, S., Metayer, S., Crotchet, S., Rideau, N. Collin, A. and Tesserand, S. (2004).
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2:72. Biomed, Central Ltd.
Clauer, P.I. (2005). Poultry – A Small Scale Agriculture Alternative. Animal and Poultry
Sciences Department, 3300 Litton Reaves Hall, VA Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Cole, H.H and Cupps, P.T. (1997). Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 3rd
edition.
Academic Press, New York. pp. 529-540.
Cooper, M.A and Washburn, K.W. (1998). The relationships of body temperature to weight
gain, feed consumption and feed utilization in broilers under heat stress. Poult. Sci. 77:
237-242.
CTA. (1987). Manual of poultry production in the tropics. The technical center for
agricultural and rural cooperation. C.A.B. Int.pp. 8-17, 39-57, 84.
Curtis, P.A., Gardner, F.A., Mellor, D.B. (1985). A comparison of selected quality and
compositional characteristics of brown and white eggs. II. Interior quality. Poult. Sci.
64: 302-306.
Daghir, N.J. (2008). Poultry Production in Hot Climates. 2nd
ed. CAB International,
Wallingford, UK. pp. 387.
De Andrade, A.N., Rogler, J.C., Featherston, W.R. (1976). Influence of constant elevated
temperature and diet on egg production and shell quality. Poult. Sci. 55: 685-693.
90
De Andrade, A.N., Rogler, J.C., Featherston, W.R., Alliston, C.W. (1977). Interrelationships between diet and elevated temperature (cyclic and constant) on egg
production and shell quality. Poult. Sci. 56: 1178-1188.
Duncan, D.B. (1955). New Multiple Range Test. Biometrics 11: 1-42.
Eekeren, N., Maas, A., Saatkamp, H., Verschuer, M. (1995). Small scale poultry production
in the tropics. Wageningen : Agromisa.
Egbunike, G.N. (2002). Effect of crude inhibin on the attainment of puberty and ovarian
activities in layers in the humid tropics. Proc. of 7th
Ann. Conf. Anim. Sci. Ass. of
Nigeria. (ASAN); Sept 16-19th, 2002, Univ. of Agric. Abeokuta, Nig. pp. 41.
Emery, D.A., Vohra, P., Ernst, R.A., Morrison, S.R. (1984). The effect of cyclic and
constant ambient temperatures on feed consumption, egg production, egg weight and
shell thickness of hens. Poult. Sci. 63: 2027-2035.
Ensminger, M.E. (1991). Animal Science. Inter-State Publishers, Inc. Danville, Illinois.
Ensminger, M.E., Oldfield, J.E., Heinemann, W.W. (1990). Feeds and Nutrition. USA, The
Ensminger Pub. Coy. pp.593-666.
Etches, R.I. (1996). Reproduction in Poultry. CAB International. University press, Cambridge.
Uk. Pp.128-148.
Ezekwe, A.G. (2011). Managing Livestock Farms. Unpub. M.Sc. Lecture Notes, Department
of Animal Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka. pp. 5-15.
Famure, O.D. (1988). Survey of empirical evidence on technical economics of large scale
poultry production in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Animal Prodcution and
Research. Volume 8, Number 1, pg. 49-61.
FAO, (2003). Livestock development for food security. Food security through sustainable crop
production and livestock development, by O. thieme final technical support on
livestock fodder production activities in Afghanisn. Rome
Gillespie, J.R. (1997). Modern livestock and poultry production, 5th edition , Delmar
Publishers. ITP Company. Pp. 640-647.
Goher, L.M., EL-Wardany, A.M., Enab, A.A. (1994). Direct and correlated responses of egg
production performance under selection for egg weight in some local breeds of
chickens. Egypt Poultry Sci. Vol 14:1-23.
Gueye, E.F. (2000). The role of family poultry in poverty alleviation, food security and the
promotion of gender equality in rural Africa. Outlook on agriculture 29(2)129-136(8).
Available at http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contenti/ip/009/2000/00000031/artooo7).
91
Hahn, G.L., Mader, T.I., Eigenberg, R.A. (2003). Perspective and development of thermal
indices for animal studies and management. In: Interactions between climate and
animal production. EAAP Technical series No. 7. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Hanson, K.J. (2005). Small birds, big hearts. Aviculturist, Ornithologist, Diplomatic
American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization. Review Physicians.6640
Congress St, New Port Richey.
Hassan, A.H.A (1991). Some factors affecting egg quality in relation to hatching results. M.Sc
Thesis. Zagazig Univ., Egypt.
Henken, A.M., Grrote-Schaarsberg, A.M.J., Nieuwland, M.G.B. (1983). The effect of
environmental temperature on immune response and metabolism of the young chicken.
Herren, R.V. (1994). The Science of Animal Agriculture. 1st edition New York, Delmar
Publishers Inc.
Holik, V. (2009). Management of laying hens to minimize heat stress. Lohman Info. 44(1): 16-
29.
Imai, k. (2003). Egg production and its physiological regulation in domestic fowl. Jpn. J.
Ornithol. 52. 1-12.
Imik, H., Ozkanlar, S., Kanyar, O., Koffed, M. (2009). Effects of Vitamins E, C and alfa
lipoic acid supplementation on the serum glucose, lipid profile and proteins in quails
under heat stress. Bull. Vet. Inst. pulawy, 53:521-526.
Isiaka, B.T. (1998). Livestock rearing practices and problems in Lagos. In Oduguwa, O.O.,
Fanimo, A.O., Osimowo, O.A.(Editors). Proceedings of Silver Anniversary
Conference, Nigerian Soceity for Animal Production. Gateway Hotel, abeokuta. 21-26
March 1998. pp 223-225.
Islam, M.S.F and Jabbar, M.A. (2005). Smallholder poultry model for poverty alleviation in
Bangladesh: a review of evidence on impact. Livestock research for rural development,
17(10). Available at
http://www.cipav.org.co/index.php?option=comwrapper&itemid64).
Jakowksi, R. and Kaufman, G.(2004). Avian Reproductive Diseases. Zoological Medicine
lectures. Tufts University Sciences Knowledgebase, (TUSK). Boston, Ma.
Johnson, A.L. (1990). Steroidogenesis and actions of steroids in the hen ovary. Crit. Rev.
Poult. Biol. 2:319-346.
Karaman, S., Tahran, S., Ergunes, G. (2007). Analysis of Indoor Climatic Data to Assess
the Heat Stress of Laying Hens. IJNES; 1(2): 65-68.
Kemps, B.J. Bamelis, F.R., Ketalaere, B., Mertens, K., Tona, K., Decuypere, E.M.,
DeBaerdemaeker, J.G. (2006). Visible transmission spectroscopy for assessment of
egg quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 86: 1399-1406.
92
Kirunda, D.F., Scheideler, S.E., McKee, S.R. (2001). The efficacy of vitamin E (DL-
alpha-tocopheryl acetate) supplements in hen diets to alleviate egg quality deterioration
associated with high temperature exposure. Poult. Sci. 80: 1378-1383.
Koelkebeck, K.W. (2001). Physiological Responses of Poultry to the Environment. Illini
PoultryNet. The Online Resource for the Poultry.
Koelkebeck, K.W., Parsons, C.M., Wang, X. (1998). Effect of acute heat stress on amino
acid digestibility in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 77:1393-1396.
Kohne, H.J. and Jones, E.J. (1976). The relationship of circulating levels of oestrogens,
corticosterone and calcium to production performance of adult turkey hens under
conditions of increasing ambient temperature. Poult. Sci. 55: 277-285.
Kucuk, O., Sahin, N., Sahin, K., Gursu, M.F., Gulcu, F., Ozcelik, M., Issi, M. (2003). Egg
production, egg quality, and lipid peroxidation status in laying hens maintained at a low
ambient temperature (60C) and fed a Vitamin C and Vitamin E-supplemented diet. Vet.
Med.- Czech. 48(1-2):33-40.
Kyvsgaard, N (2007). Review of small scale poultry production in Latin America. Draft
Paper. Available upon request from author at [email protected]
Latour, M.A., Meunier, R., Stewart, J. (2003). The process of egg formation. Department of
Animal Sciences, Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service.
Leeson, S. (1986). Nutritional considerations of poultry during heat stress.- In: World’s foult.
Sc. J., 42, PP. 68-91.
Luiting, P. (1990). Genetic variation of energy partitioning in laying hens: Causes of variation
in residual feed consumption. Worlds’s Poult. Sci. 46: 132-152.
Mahmoud, K.Z., Beck, M.M., Scheideler, S.E., Forman, M.F., Anderson, K.P.,
Kachman, S.D. (1996). Acute high environmental temperature and calcium-estrogen
relationship in the hen. Poult. Sci. 75: 1555-1562.
Mallia, J.G. (1999). Observation on family poultry units in parts of Central America and
sustainable development opportunities. Livestock research for rural development .
11(13). Available at http://www.cipav.org.co/index.php?option=comwrapper&itemid
Mardsen, A. and Morris, T.R. (1981). Egg production at high temperatures. In Smith, A.J.
and Gunn, R.E. (eds.) Intensive Animal Prod. In Developing Countries. BSAP: Thames
Ditton, Uk. pp 299-319.
Mardsen, A., Morris, T.R., Cromarty, A.S. (1987). Effects of constant environmental
temperatures on performance of laying pullets. Br. Poult. Sci. 28:361-380.
Mashaly, M.M., Hendricks, G.L., Kalam, A.M., Gehad, A.E., Abbas, O.A., Patterson,
P.H. (2004). Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune response of
commercial laying hens. Poult. Sci. 83: 889-894.
93
McDaniel, C.D., Bramwell, R.K., Wilson, J.L., Howarth Jr.B. (1995). Fertility of male
and female broiler breeders following exposure to elevated ambient temperatures.
Poult. Sci. 74: 1029-1038.
McKee, J.S and Harrison, P.C., Riskowski, G.L. (1997). Effects of supplemental ascorbic
acid on energy conversion of broiler chicks during heat stress feed withdrawal. Poult.
Sci. 76:1278-1286.
McKee, S.R. and Sams, A.R. (1997). The effect of seasonal heat stress on rigor development
and the incidence of pale, exudative turkey meat. Poult. Sci. 76: 1616-1620.
McNitt, J.I. (1983). Livestock Husbandry Techniques. 1st Edn, Great Britain Granada
Publishing Ltd.
Miles, R.D and Jacob, J.P. (2000). Feeding The Commercial Egg Type Laying Hen.
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences. University of Florida. Cooperative
Extension Services, Institution of Food and Agricultural Sciences.
Minvielle, F.B., Kayang., Onoue Murayama, M., Miwa., M., Kigkai, A., Ray, S.V.R.
(2006). Layer Breeding Concepts and Principles. Pouvlet.Comm.
Muiruri, H.K. and Harrison, P.C (1991). Effect of roost temperature on performance of
chickens in hot ambient environments. Poult. Sci. 70: 2253-2258.
Nalbandov, A.V. (1996). Egg laying. In Introduction to Livestock Production. 2nd
edition
(H.H. Cole, ed.) W.H. Freeman and Company.
Nofal, M.E. and Amina. A. (2000). Effect of age hens and oviposition intervals in Mamourah;
a local chicken breed and their effects on hatching traits and chicks weight. Egypt
Poultry Sci. 20 (3): 857-867.
Nofal, M.E., Yamani, K.A., EL-Sayid, G.H.A., Abd EL-Kader, Y.M. (2000). Effect of
restricted feeding on performance of Gimmizah and Mamourah laying hens. Proc.
Conf. Anim. Prod. In The 21st Century, Sakha, 18, 21 April. 375-384.
Novo, R.P., Gama, L.T., Soares, M.C. (1997). Effects of oviposition time, hen age and extra
dietary calcium on egg characteristics and hatchability. Journal of Applied Poultry
Research, 6:335-343.
Nwosu, C.C. and Omeje, S.S. (1985). Improved Annual Egg Production from Nigerian local
chicken by crossing with Gold Link. Nig.J. Animal Production 12:161-164.
Nwosu, C.C., Omeje, S.S.I., Ikeme, A.I. (1987). Effects of genotype, age and egg size on
measures of egg quality of cross bred hens. J. Anim. Sci. 7(1): 19-27.
Nys, Y. and Morgan, P. (1981). The effect of 6-and 8-hour light-dark cycles on egg
production and pattern of ovipositions. Br. Poult. Sci, 22:391-397.
94
Obioha, F.C. (1992). A Guide to Poultry Production in the Tropics. Acena Publishers.
Enugu, Nigeria . pp 153-155
Odom, T.W., Harrison, P.C., Bottje, W.G. (1986). Effects of thermal-induced respiratory
alkalosis on blood ionized calcium levels in the domestic hen. Poult. Sci. 65:570-573.
Oformata, G.E.K. (1975). Soil Erosion. In : Nigeria in Maps. Eastern States. Benin, Ethiope
Pub. House. Pp 43-45.
Oguz, F.K., Oguz, M.N., Buyukoglu, T. and Sahindokuyucu, F. (2010). Effects of L-
carnitine and vitamin C-electrolyte premix supplementation to diet containing safflower
seed on performance, egg quality and some serum parameters in quails under summer
condition. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 9:1212-1215.
Okonkwo, W.I and Akubuo, C.O. (2007). Trombe Wall System For Poultry Brooding. Int. J.
Poult Sci. 6(2); 125-130.
Oluyemi, J.A. and Roberts, F.A. (2000). Poultry Production Spectrum Books, ltd, Ibadan.
Omeje, S.S.I. (1983). Heterosis of bodyweight and short term egg production in crosses
between Parent Stock of Gold-link and local chickens of Nigeria. Msc. Thesis
University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Orji, B.I and Nwakalor, L.N. (1984). The pattern of egg laying in domestic fowls kept in
warm tropics. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 11(2):123-129.
Parker, J.E. (1968). Reproductive physiology in poultry. In Reproduction in Farm Animals.
(E.S.E. Hafez ed.) 2nd
edition. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.
Patterson, P.H., Sunde, M.L., Schieber, E.M., White, W.B. (1988). Wheat middlings as an
alternative feedstuff in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 67:1329-1338.
Payne, W.J.A. (1990). An Introduction to Animal Husbandry in the Tropics. 4th edition,
Longman Scientific and Technical. John wiley and Sons, Inc. New York.
Pesek, L. (1999). The incredible female Bird Reproductive System. Winged Wisdom Pet Bird
Magazine, Ezine.
Picard, M. (1985). Proceedings of 5th European Symposium on poultry nutrition, Jerusalem.pp
97-104.
Pineda, M.H. and Dooley, M.P. (2003). McDonald’s Veterinary Endocrinology and
Reproduction. Iowa State Press.
Poultryhelp.com (2005). A service of the rocking T Ranch and Poultry Farm Online.
Kempner, Texas. Retrieved November 14, 2005 from
http://poultryhelp.com/oddeggs.html
95
PoultryHub (2010). Reproduction. Accessed at www.poul tryhub.org/
index.php/Reproduction acceseed on 15th October, 2010.
Reddy, B.L.N., Prahaj, N.K., Reddy, M.R., Ray, S.V.R. (2004). Layer Breeding-Concepts
and Principles. Poulvet.com.
Robinson, F.E and Renema, R.A. (1999b). Female Reproduction: Control of Ovarian
function. Alberta Poultry Research Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB,
Canada.
Robinson, F.E. and Renema, R.H. (1999a). Principles of photoperiod management in
Broiler-Breeders. Vol. 7, Num 1.
Robinson, F.E., Hardin, R.T., Robinson, N.A., Williams, B.J. (1991). The influence of egg
sequence position on fertility, embryo viability and embryo weight in broiler breeders.
Poultry Science, 70: 769-765.
Roland, D.A. Sr. (1981). Relationship of interval between eggs and time of Oviposition to egg
shell quality. Poultry Sci 60: 1066-1077.
Rose, S.P. (1997). Principles of poultry Science. CAB International.
Sahin, K., Sahin, N., Orderci, M. (2002). Vitamin E Supplementation can alleviate negative
effects of heat stress on egg quality, digestibility on nutrients and egg yolk mineral
concentrations of Japanese quails. Res. Vet. Sci. 73:307-312.
Samak, H.R.A. (2001). Evaluation and improving the production performance in some local
chickens. PhD Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Zagazig Univ., Banha Branch. Moshtohor, Egypt.
Scott, T.A and Balnave, D. (1988). Comparison between concentrated complete diets and
self-selection for feeding sexually maturing pullets at hot and cold temperatures. Br.
Poult. Sci. 29: 613-625.
Sinkalu, V.O., Ayo, A.B., Adelaiye, B., Hambolu, J.O. (2008). Combined effects of
Vitamins A, C, and E on diurnal variations in rectal temperature of Black Harco Pullets
during the hot-dry season. Proc. of the 13th
Ann. Conf. of the Ani. Sci. Assoc. of Nig.
(ASAN), Sept. pp. 158-159.
Smith, A.J. (2001). Poultry. The Tropical Agriculturalist. 2nd
(revised) ed. Macmillan
Education Ltd. U.K. Pp 1 – 73.
Smith, K.I. (2003). The reproductive system. The Hen, Incubation and Embryo development.
Bulletin 633. Ohio State University.
Smith, T.W. (2003). Culling Hens. Publication 358. Extension Services of Mississippi State
University.
Spradbrow, P.B (1997). Policy framework for small holder rural poultry development.
In:Sustainable Rural Poultry Production in Africa (Ed. E.B. Sonaiya). Proceedings of
96
an international workshop, 13th-16
th june, 1995. International Livestock Research
Institute, Addis Ababa.
SPSS (2003). Statistical package for social sciences, windows version 8. Copyright SPSS Inc.
USA.
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., Dickey, D.A. (1997). Principles and Procedures of statistics. A
biometrical approach. 2nd
ed. Mc-Graw Hill. Singapore.
Stern, A. (1988). Poultry and Poultry keeping. Merehurst press, London. Pp.53-54.
Sykes. A.H. (1988). Some observations on Oviposition in the fowl. Wvart J. Expo Physical 38:
61-65.
Tao, X and Xin, H. (2003). Temperature-humidity-velocity-index for market size broilers.
Nevada, USA: proceedings of the ASAE Annual International Meeting.
Tuleun, C.D., Njoku, P.C., Okwori, A.I. (2010). Effect of dietary ascorbic acid on
performance of broiler chickens exposed to different lighting regimes. Int. J. Poult. Sci.
9(2): 118-125.
USDA, (2006). Standards, Grades, and Weight Classes for shell eggs. USDA AMS 56.
http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv10/getfile? dDocName=STELDV3004376. Accessed
January 2, 2008.
Van der Molen, W.H. (2004). Laying an Egg. An interesting event. Retrieved November 14,
2005 from http://www.afn.org/~poultry/egghen.htm.
Whitehead, C. and Mitchell, M. (2010). Vitamin E and heat stress in laying hens. Accessed
at www.informaworld.com/index/RPWD0112FAVGP1B9.
Whitehead, C.C., Bollengier-Lee, S., Mitchel, M.A., Williams, P.E.V. (1998). Alleviation of
depression in egg production in heat stressed laying hens by Vitamin E. Pages 576-578.
Proceedings of 10th
European Poultry Conference, Jerusalem, Israel.
Wolfenson, D., Frei, Y.F., Snapir, N., Berman, A. (1979). Effect of diurnal or nocturnal heat
stress on egg formation. Br. Poult. Sci. 20: 167-174.
Wolford, J.H., Ringer., R.K and Coloman, T.H.(1997). Lag time, Interval between
successive eggs and oviposition time in turkey. Poult. Sci., 43: 612-615.
Zakaria, A.H. (2001). Egg production of the domestic hen is a reflection of ovarian
physiology-A review: Part 1. Egg laying characteristics. Damascus Univ. J. Agric. Sci.
17:131-147.
Zakaria, H.H., Plumstead, P.W., Romero-Sanchez, H., Leksrisompong, N., Osborne, J.,
Brake, J. (2005). Oviposition Pattern, Egg weight, Fertility and Hatchability of young
and old broiler breeders. Poult. Sci 84(a): 1505-9
97
Zhou, W.T., Fujita, M., Yamamoto, S., Iwasaki, K., Ikawa, R., Oyama, H., Horikawa,
H. (1998). Effect of glucose in drinking water on changes in whole food viscosity and
plasma osmolality of broiler chickens during high temperature exposure. Poult. Sci. 77:
644-647.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 A) Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Table for egg weight and its relationship to oviposition interval
Duncana EGGWT Shaver Brown
OvipoINT Subset for alpha =0.05
N 1 2 3 4 5
10 9
8 7 6 5 4 2 3 1
Sig.
8 8
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
51.5050 53.6113
.87
58.2237
1.000
63.7200 65.6275 66.0713
.070
65.6275 66.0713 67.8475
.087
67.8475 68.7888 68.8050 70.0538
.101
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Sample Size = 8.000
Duncana
EGGWT Nera Black
OvipoINT
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10 9 8 7 6 5 4
3 2 1 Sig.
8 8 8 8 8 8 8
8 8 8
52.6600
1.000
54.9737
1.000
57.3850
1.000
59.7938
1.000
63.7850
1.000
66.2125 67.9413
.067
67.9414
68.5125 69.4638 .126
68.5125 69.4638 70.1000 .110
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Sample Size = 8.000 B) Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Table for egg weight and its relationship to clutch size
98
EGGWT Shaver brown Duncan a,,b
CLUCTH No. Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
14 10 9 5 6
12 7 15 4 13 2 11 16
3 17 8 Sig.
42 30 27 40 30
36 21 45 28 39 14 44 32
9 34 24
56.0145 56.4520
.709
56.4520 58.6026
.067
58.6026 59.8537 60.8970
.064
59.8537 60.8970
61.3317 61.4705
.214
61.3317 61.4705 63.4167 63.4721 63.5492 63.8800 63.8827 63.8922
65.1278 66.0106 .063
61.3317 61.4705 63.4167 63.4721 63.5492 63.8800 63.8827 63.8922
65.1278 66.0106 .059
66.8467 .169
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 25.845 b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
EGGWT Nera black Duncan a,,b
CLUCTH No. N Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 11 8 5 15 4 10
13 12 16 9 14 17 7 3
2 Sig.
42 33 32 45 45 36 30
39 36 32 27 42 34 28 21
20
54.4424 55.0391
.248
57.0278 57.2058 57.6044
.296
61.4856 61.9560
.362
63.1867 63.6483
.371
64.7053 64.9122 65.1729 65.4338
.202
65.1729 65.4338 66.2200
.055
68.1876
68.3050 .820
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 32.053 b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic man of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed. C) Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Table for egg weight and its relationship to position of eggs in a clutch
99
EGGWT Shaver brown Duncan a,,b
POSITION N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
14 10
9 12 13 15 11 16 8 5 7
6 4 17 3 2 1 Sig.
10 23
26 16 13 7 20 4 29 45 32
37 52 2 55 62 62
58.4220 59.4574
59.7265 60.0125 60.4446 60.4857 60.7030 60.7200 61.0397 61.5640 61.6341
61.9143 62.0794 62.4400 62.8738 63.3271 .058
59.4574
59.7265 60.0125 60.4446 60.4857 60.7030 60.7200 61.0397 61.5640 61.6341
61.9143 62.0794 62.4400 62.8738 63.3271 64.0371 .078
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 11.733 b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
EGGWT Nera black Duncan a,,b
POSITION N Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
5 15
4 6 8 10 9 3 7 14
14 11 13 12 2 16 1 17
Sig.
49 7
58 40 29 22 25 65 33 10
19 13 16 75 4 75 2
60.0682 60.1200
60.3788 60.4965 60.5372 60.5736 60.9732 61.3915 61.4382 61.4510
61.5589 61.5708 61.8188 62.9101 63.2775 63.6092 63.6250
.144
Means for groups homogenous in homogenous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 11.807 b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group size is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
100
APPENDIX 2 Effect of temperature on performance of Shaver brown hens
a) Analysis of variance(ANOVA) Table for Hen Day Egg Production (HDEP)
HDEP Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
25.70 25.20 25.00 24.90 24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 21 7
46.5714 47.4286 47.7143 48.7143 50.5714 .239
50.5714 56.4286 .54
Mean for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
B) ANOVA Table for Average Daily Feed Intake (ADFI)
DFI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3
25.70 25.20 24.90 25.00 24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 21 7
55.1286 1.000
58.7500 58.9786 60.8900 60.9867 .061
60.8900 60.9867 62.8457 .090
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed.
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
C) ANOVA Table for Egg Weight (EGGWT)
EGGWT Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
25.20 25.00
25.70 24.70 24.90 24.50 Sig.
7 7
7 21 7 7
62.9814 63.0686
64.2571 64.4038 64.7271 66.1269 .119
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
101
D) ANOVA Table for EGG Shell Weight (ESWT)
ESWT Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
25.00 25.20 24.90 24.70
25.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 21
7 7
8.0300 8.0486 8.0600 8.0652
8.0729 .165
8.0486 8.0600 8.0652
8.0729 8.0952 .126
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed..
E) ANOVA Table for Egg Shell Thickness (EST)
EST Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
25.20 24.70 25.00 24.90 25.70 24.50 Sig.
7 21 7 7 7 7
.2186
.2324
.2357
.2386
.2414
.2429
.086
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed.
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed..
F) ANOVA Table for Egg Shape Index (ESI)
ESI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for aplpha = 0.05
1 2 3
25.20 25.00 25.70 24.50
24.90 24.70 Sig.
7 7 7 7
7 21
1.4243 1.4286 1.4314 1.4457
.094
1.4286 1.4314 1.4457
1.4507 .083
1.4457
1.4507 1.4571 .354
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
102
G) ANOVA Table for Albumin Height (ALBHT) Duncan a,,b
ALBHT
IndoorTEMP Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3 4 5
25.70 25.20 25.00 24.90
24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7
21 7
6.7500 6.8529 6.9886
.346
6.8529 6.9886
.215
7.0871
.366
7.0871
7.2833 .075
7.7143 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
H) ANOVA Table for Albumin Index (ALBI) Duncan a,,b
ALBI
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1
24.70 25.70 24.50 24.90 25.00
25.20 Sig.
21 7 7 7 7
7
.1067
.1071
.1100
.1100
.1100
.1100
.102
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
I) ANOVA Table for Yolk Height (YHT)
Duncan a,,b
YHT
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3
25.20
25.70 25.00 24.70 24.90 24.50 Sig.
7
7 7 21 7 7
18.3300
18.4143 .182
18.5971 18.6748 18.6800 .216
18.9100 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875
b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
103
J) ANOVA Table for Yolk Index (YI)
YI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3
24.50 24.70 25.20 25.70 24.90
25.00 Sig.
7 21 7 7 7
7
.5986
.6057
.073
.6186 .6186 .6229
.307
.6229
.6286
.149
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
K) ANOVA Table for Haugh Unit (HU)
HU Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4
25.70 25.20 25.00 24.90 24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 21 7
81.1714 81.1771 .989
82.5514 82.7200 .675
83.7467 1.000
86.4629 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.875 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
104
APPENDIX 3 Effect of temperature on performance of Nera Black hens
a) Analysis of variance(ANOVA) Table for Hen Day Egg Production (HDEP)
HDEP Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3
25.70 25.20 25.00
24.90 24.70 27.40 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7
7 14 7 7
47.8571 48.2857 48.8571
50.0000 52.3571 .053
50.0000 52.3571 54.0000 .069
54.0000 56.7143 .189
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538
b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
B) ANOVA Table for Daily Feed Intake (DFI)
DFI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4
25.70 25.20
25.00 24.90 27.40 24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7
7 7 7 14 7
70.7000
1.000
76.2500
78.4243 78.7071 .315
78.4243 78.7071 82.5900 82.9050 .077
91.2500 1.00
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed.
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
C) ANOVA Table for Egg Weight (EGGWT)
EGGWT Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2
25.00
25.70 24.70 24.90 25.20 24.50 27.40 Sig.
7
7 14 7 7 7 7
60.8957
62.7786 63.6400 63.7786 64.0714 .150
62.7786 63.6400 63.7786 64.0714 65.3629 66.2200 .125
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed.
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
105
D) ANOVA Table for Egg Shell Weight (ESWT)
ESWT
Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4
25.70 25.20 25.00 24.90 24.70 27.40
24.50
7 7 7 7 14 7
7
7.7257
1.000
7.9943
1.000
7.9614 7.9743 8.0200 8.0200
.100
8.0200 8.0200
8.0871 .051
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
E) ANOVA Table for Egg Shell Thickness (EST)
EST Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3
25.70 25.20 24.90 25.00 24.70 27.40 24.50
Sig.
7 7 7 7 14 7 7
.2029
.2071
.2100
.2114
.2171
.070
.2071 .2100 .2114 .2171 .2200
1.03
.2114 .2171 .2200 .2257
.063
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
F) ANOVA Table for Egg Shape Index (ESI)
ESI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP Subset for alpha =
0.05
N 1 2 3 4
25.70
25.20 24.90 25.00 27.40 24.50 24.70 Sig.
7
7 7 7 7 7 14
1.4157
1.000
1.4443 1.000
1.4529 1.4529 1.000
1.4600 1.4629 1.4629 .267
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed.
a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
106
H) ANOVA Table for Albumin Height (ALBHT)
ALBHT Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4
25.70 25.20 25.00 24.90 27.40
24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 7
14 7
7.7457 7.7743
.301
8.0214 8.0243
.917
8.1486
8.1500 .956
8.3029 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
I) ANOVA Table for Albumin Index (ALBI)
ALBI Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3
24.50 24.90 25.00
27.40 24.70 25.20 25.70 Sig.
7 7 7
7 14 7 7
.1100
.1100
.1100
.1100 1.000
.1100 1.000
.1200 .1200 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
J) ANOVA Table for Yolk Height (YHT)
YHT Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3 4 5
25.70 25.20 24.90 25.00 27.40
24.70 24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 7
14 7
18.2529
1.000
18.3029 18.3071 18.3114
.630
18.4129
1.000
18.4593 1.000
18.5129 1.000
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
107
K) ANOVA Table for Yolk Index (YI)
YI Duncan a,,b
indoorTEMP Subset for alpha = 0.05
N 1 2 3
27.40 24.70 24.50 24.90 25.20
25.00 25.70 Sig.
7 14 7 7 7
7 7
.6029
.6036
.6043
.6057
.244
.6043 .6057 .6086
.070
.6057 .6086
.6100
.6100
.080
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
L) ANOVA Table for Haugh Unit (HU)
HU
Duncan a,,b
IndoorTEMP N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
1 2 3 4 5
25.70 25.20 24.90 25.00 27.40 24.70
24.50 Sig.
7 7 7 7 7 14
7
86.1943 86.6729
.297
86.6729 87.2071 87.6214
.053
87.2071 87.6214 88.0414
.088
87.6214 88.0414 88.3807
.120
88.3807
89.0300 .159
Means for groups in homogenous subsets are displayed. a) Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 7.538 b) The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type 1 error levels are not guaranteed.
108