Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. Enrollment has increased; state appropriations have...
-
Upload
hollie-hampton -
Category
Documents
-
view
237 -
download
1
Transcript of Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education. Enrollment has increased; state appropriations have...
Oklahoma State Regents Oklahoma State Regents
for Higher Educationfor Higher Education
Enrollment has increased; Enrollment has increased; state appropriations have decreased.state appropriations have decreased.
Enrollment has increased; Enrollment has increased; state appropriations have decreased.state appropriations have decreased.
System Funding and FTE Enrollment History
119,115 121,111
128,530
134,874
140,250 est.
$829.1
$767.8
$791.5
$816.2
$772.2105,000
110,000
115,000
120,000
125,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
145,000
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04
$767.0
$777.0
$787.0
$797.0
$807.0
$817.0
$827.0
$837.0
$847.0
$857.0
FTE Enrollment Appropriations
Change in Resident Undergraduate Tuition (public four-year) and State Higher Education Appropriations,
1990-91 to 2003-04
Change in Resident Undergraduate Tuition (public four-year) and State Higher Education Appropriations,
1990-91 to 2003-04
-6%
-3%
0%
3%
6%
9%
12%
15%
90-9191-92
92-9393-94
94-9595-96
96-9797-98
98-9999-00
00-0101-02
02-0303-04
Financial Outlook 2004Financial Outlook 2004Financial Outlook 2004Financial Outlook 2004
Tuition on the Tuition on the RiseRise
Over the past decade, average tuition and fees, adjusted for
inflation, increased $1,506 (or 47 percent)
at public four-year colleges and $5,866 (or 42 percent) at private
four-year colleges.
State Population with Bachelor’s State Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher Age 25 Years and Degree or Higher Age 25 Years and
Older, 2002Older, 2002
State Population with Bachelor’s State Population with Bachelor’s Degree or Higher Age 25 Years and Degree or Higher Age 25 Years and
Older, 2002Older, 2002Dist of Columbia 1
Maryland 2Colorado 3Virginia 4
Massachusetts 5Connecticut 6New Jersey 7
Vermont 8Minnesota 9
New Hampshire 10Rhode Island 11
Delaware 12Kansas 13
New York 14Washington 15
California 16Illinois 17
Nebraska 18Oregon 19
Utah 20Hawaii 21
Missouri 22Arizona 23
Texas 24Pennsylvania 25
Florida 26Alaska 27
New Mexico 28North Dakota 29
Georgia 30Wisconsin 31
Ohio 32Maine 33
Indiana 34Montana 35
South Dakota 36South Carolina 37
Iowa 38Alabama 39Michigan 40
North Carolina 41Nevada 42
Louisiana 43Kentucky 44Tennessee 45
Idaho 46Mississippi 47Oklahoma 48Wyoming 49Arkansas 50
West Virginia 51
44.437.635.734.634.332.631.430.830.530.130.129.529.128.828.327.927.327.127.128.826.826.426.326.226.125.725.625.425.32524.724.523.823.723.623.623.323.122.722.522.422.122.121.621.520.920.920.419.618.515.9
Oklahoma 48Oklahoma 48 20.420.4
Enrollment Enrollment Growth at Growth at For-Profit For-Profit CollegesCollegesAlthough the biggest for-profit colleges enroll less than 3 percent of all postsecondary students, their enrollment is growing much faster than that of higher education as a whole.
Enrollment Enrollment Growth at Growth at For-Profit For-Profit CollegesCollegesAlthough the biggest for-profit colleges enroll less than 3 percent of all postsecondary students, their enrollment is growing much faster than that of higher education as a whole.
Population with Bachelor’s Degree or higher
Per
Ca
pit
a In
com
e
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
$28,000
$30,000
15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
OKState Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of Adult Population with Bachelor’s Adult Population with Bachelor’s Degree or HigherDegree or Higher
Population with Bachelor’s Degree or higher
Per
Ca
pit
a In
com
e
DCCT
NJMA
MD
VA
CO
CAWA
IL
IN
MESC
MI
NV
AZTXIA
WV AR
MS
ID
OK
LA
KYAL
MTNM
UT
NDSDTN
WY
NC
KSOR
NE
MO
OHWI
GAFL
PAHI VT
RI
NH
DE
MNNYAK
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
$28,000
$30,000
15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of State Per Capita Personal Income v. Share of Adult Population with Bachelor’s Adult Population with Bachelor’s Degree or HigherDegree or Higher
14.3%15.1%
34.8%37.5%
52.0%
57.7%60.7%
69.2%
0 - $34,999 $35,000 – $64,999 $65,000 - $99,999 $100,000 and above
Percent of Population with Bachelor’s Degree by Age Percent of Population with Bachelor’s Degree by Age and Individual Income and Individual Income
Quartile for the State of Oklahoma and U.S.Quartile for the State of Oklahoma and U.S.
Per
cen
t of
Pop
ula
tion
wit
h a
B
ach
elor
’s D
egre
e
Income Quartile
Oklahoma 25 years of age and over
U.S. 25 years of age and over
Number of Public Higher Education Number of Public Higher Education Institutions Compared to Total PopulationInstitutions Compared to Total Population
(Actual vs. Predicted)(Actual vs. Predicted)
Number of Public Higher Education Number of Public Higher Education Institutions Compared to Total PopulationInstitutions Compared to Total Population
(Actual vs. Predicted)(Actual vs. Predicted)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
0 5000000 10000000 15000000 20000000 25000000 30000000 35000000 40000000
Population
Nu
mb
er o
f P
ub
lic In
stit
uti
on
s
OK
Projected Change in Employment by Projected Change in Employment by Education and Training, 1998-2008Education and Training, 1998-2008Projected Change in Employment by Projected Change in Employment by Education and Training, 1998-2008Education and Training, 1998-2008
Education and PercentTraining Category IncreaseDoctoral Degree 23Master’s Degree 19
Bachelor’s Degree 24Associate Degree 31
Vocational Training 14Work Experience 12On-Job Training 7All Occupations 14
Source: Monthly Labor Review, U.S. Bureau of Labor
Empowered, Informed, Self-Directed Life Empowered, Informed, Self-Directed Life Long LearnersLong Learners
Stable or Less State Funding
Lecture = Most Economical Approach
More Students
Bigger Classes
Reduced Student Learning
Experience
Employers (Business Leaders) Less Satisfied With
Graduates
Legislators Less Sure of Quality and Value
Alternative Approaches,
Remedies
Course Redesign
Shared Resources
Skills and Attributes Skills and Attributes of a Nation of Learnersof a Nation of Learners
Skills and Attributes Skills and Attributes of a Nation of Learnersof a Nation of Learners
LeadershipLeadership TeamworkTeamwork Problem SolvingProblem Solving Time ManagementTime Management Self-managementSelf-management AdaptabilityAdaptability Analytical ThinkingAnalytical Thinking Global ConsciousnessGlobal Consciousness Basic CommunicationsBasic Communications
The Business-Higher Education Forum, Spanning the Chasm: Corporate and Academic Cooperation To Improve Workforce Preparation, 1997.
Course Redesign ProjectCourse Redesign ProjectCarol Twig, RPICarol Twig, RPI
Course Redesign ProjectCourse Redesign ProjectCarol Twig, RPICarol Twig, RPI
Active Student LearningActive Student Learning
Learning Assistance TechnologiesLearning Assistance Technologies
http://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2less.htmlhttp://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2less.html
http://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2award.htmlhttp://www.center.rpi.edu/pewgrant/rd2award.html
Today’s WorldToday’s WorldToday’s WorldToday’s World
Continuing conditions of tight budget.Continuing conditions of tight budget.
College degrees important to self, state College degrees important to self, state
and beyond.and beyond.
Think differently about teaching and learning.Think differently about teaching and learning.
Teaching for TomorrowTeaching for TomorrowTeaching for TomorrowTeaching for Tomorrow
Teach collaborativelyTeach collaboratively Advisory boards for every departmentAdvisory boards for every department Content important, but new focus on learningContent important, but new focus on learning Students expect technologyStudents expect technology Strategic investment for teachingStrategic investment for teaching
Technology Intensity of Technology Intensity of Business BaseBusiness Base
TECHNOLOGY INTENSITY OFBUSINESS BASE RANK
%Established in high-tech businesses 32
%Employed in high-tech 35
% Percent payroll in high-tech 36
% Established births in high-tech 35
2003 U.S. Department of Commerce report “The Dynamics of Technology-Based Economic Development.”
Funding In-FlowsFunding In-FlowsFUNDING IN-FLOWS RANKR&D expenditures/$1000 of GSP 43
Industry R&D/$1000 of GSP 40
Federal R&D/$1000 of GSP 28
University R&D/$1000 of GSP 31
SBIR awards/$1000 of GSP 41
STTR awards/$1000 of GSP 19
2003 U.S. Department of Commerce report “The Dynamics of Technology-Based Economic Development.”
Industrial R&D Per CapitaIndustrial R&D Per Capita
1997 1998 20001999Year
400
300
200
100
0
500
600
700
800
$ P
er C
apit
a
Source: OCAST
US
AR
OK
MO
TX
KS
Federally Funded University R&DFederally Funded University R&D
40
30
20
10
0
50
60
70
80
$ P
er C
apit
a
Source: OCAST
1996 20001999
Year
1994 1995 1997 1998 2001
AR
OK
MOKS
TX
US
State R&D ProfileState R&D Profile• Oklahoma’s Fed R&D funding
capture rate $55 per capita
• National Fed R&D funding capture rate $269 per capita
Leave $738,000,000 in federally-sponsored R&D funding on the table each year
INSTRUCTIONAL SPENDING PER FTE, BY STATEPercent Change and Current Position Relative to U.S. Average
-50%
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
-50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Percent Over/Under the U.S. Average, FY02
Per
cen
t C
han
ge,
FY
91 -
FY
02
high and increasing
low and increasing
low and decreasing
high and decreasing
AK
MS
WV
MD
KY
ILNJ
NYTX
ALSD
TNCO
NEFL
OK
LA
MT NMNC
HI
RI,MA
WA SC
ND
AR
VA
ID
KS MOGA
NH
MN
OH
WIIA
ME
MI
PA
VT
U.S.
WYUT
CA IN
OR
NVAZ
DE
Source: State Higher Education Finance (SHEF) Survey1990-91 through 2001-02 - SHEEO
Oklahoma State Regents Oklahoma State Regents
for Higher Educationfor Higher Education