Oil palm development and the challenges for sustainable and equitable growth and forest governance
-
date post
20-Oct-2014 -
Category
Education
-
view
1.949 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Oil palm development and the challenges for sustainable and equitable growth and forest governance
THINKING beyond the canopy
Oil palm development and the challenges for sustainable and
equitable growth and forest governance
D. Andrew WardellCIFOR South-South Exchange, 21 September 2011
THINKING beyond the canopy
Overview
Global and Indonesian contexts Overview of production and investment trends Governance systems for oil palm Socio-economic impacts Environmental impacts Improving sector governance Securing access to credible information Policy options
THINKING beyond the canopy
Global context Population growth and per capita consumption.
Requires an additional 28m tonnes of vegetable oil annually by 2020 (WBG, 2011).
Continued growth in global energy consumption. Energy (in)security and the high cost of fossil fuels
Apprehension associated with global warming and efforts to reduce GHG emissions
National/regional commitments to promote biofuels. 3 major players – USA, Brazil and European Union
THINKING beyond the canopy
Biofuel production trends 2001-09
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
ROW
Central & South America (less Brazil)
Asia & Oceania
Europe
Brazil
United States
Billi
on L
iters
per
yea
r
Ethanol
Biodiesel
THINKING beyond the canopy
A “crime against humanity”?
....by using 100 million tons of grain and corn to ethanol while almost a billion people are starving (Jean Ziegler, UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, 26 October 2007)
Animal production uses 756 million tons of grain per year
98% of the 225 million-ton global soy crop is fed to farmed animals
Sources: Ferrett, G., 27 October 2007; World Bank, 26 August 2008; Singer, P. 2009
all cited in Safran Froer, J. 2009.
THINKING beyond the canopy
Indonesian context 2.0 GtCO2e (2005), projected to grow to 2.6 GtCO2e
(2020) – BAU
80% of GHG emissions – LULUCF, notably conversion of peatlands (total area - 22m ha)
Oil palm - 2m ha (2000) grew to 7m ha (2010), projected to grow to between 16.5 and 26m ha by 2020
7 provinces account for 75% of LULUCF emissions e.g. East Kalimantan (86% of emissions but also 30% of GDP and 39% of jobs)
THINKING beyond the canopy
Feedstock Investments Feedstock No. of
countriesTotal investment (US$ billion) Range of investments per
country (US$ million)
Total in all countries
Estimated share for biofuel
Total range Of which for biofuel
Jatropha 7 0.18 - 0.29 0.18 - 0.29 3 - 200 3 -200
Oil palm 6 19 - 28 0.76 - 1.12 1 - 15,000 0.04 - 600Soybean 2 1.7 - 2.1 0.27 - 0.34 200 - 1,800 32 - 288
Sugarcane 5 4.3 - 5.3 0.77 - 0.95 20 - 5,000 3.6 - 900
Totals 20 25 - 36 2.0 - 2.7 1 - 15,000 0.04 – 900
Total investments in past 10 years: US$ 25 -36 billion Of which for biofuel: US$ 2.0 - 2.7 billion Two-thirds in oil palm
THINKING beyond the canopy
Biofuel Investments Based on feedstock
No. of countries
researched
No. of countries with biofuel investments
Total biofuel investment(US$ billion)
Range of investments per
country (US$ million)
Jatropha 7 1 0.01 - 0.02 14 – 18
Oil palm 6 3 1.2 - 1.6 150 - 1,000
Soybean 2 1 0.7 - 0.9 700 – 900
Sugarcane 5 2 3.8 - 4.2 8 - 4,200
Totals 20 7 5.7 - 6.7 8 - 4,200
Total investments: US$ 5.7 – 6.7 billion Two-thirds in sugar-based ethanol One-third in biodiesel from palm oil and soy
THINKING beyond the canopy
Governance systems for biofuels Role and effectiveness of government intervention in promoting
domestic production capacity and uptake Maintain supplies for domestic use (pricing, incentives, single-use
feedstocks and progressive export tax) Importance of government support both on the production and
consumption side Role and effectiveness of government intervention in maximizing
benefits of large-scale investments and minimizing costs of sector development Environmental protection
SEIA - weak compliance Smallholder participation
Enhancing smallholder productivity and market access Mechanisms for FPIC, avenues for legal recourse
Land tenure security Stimulating investments in suitable and available land
THINKING beyond the canopy
Deforestation from industrial plantationsSite Start
dateConcession
area (ha)
Area developed
(ha)
Area deforested
(ha)
Forest type % expansion displacing
forest
West Kalimantan, Indonesia
1994 13 605 5266(by 2009)
4949(by 2009)
Secondary peat swamp forest
94%
Boven Digoel, Papua, Indonesia
1998 34 000 17 000(by 2010)
11 300(by 2008)
Humid tropical
66%
Murdiyarso et al (2010) estimate total carbon loss of 1486 ± 183 MgCO2/ha
Fargione et al (2008) estimate 1294-3452 MgCO2/ha total carbon loss 420 to 840 years to recover the ‘carbon debt’ of peatland forest conversion to palm oil
Wicke et al (2008) estimate 8-16 years payback time from palm-oil based electricity production on logged-over forest
Carbon cycle implications
THINKING beyond the canopy
Socio-economic impacts Employees
Livelihood improvements observed in several sites due to increased incomes and improved access to social services
Mixed or negative impacts in others due to poor employment conditions, and not meeting promises or expectations
Gains from regularity of income rather than amounts Majority of jobs on palm oil plantations go to ‘migrants’
Land losing households Growing landlessness Loss of agricultural and forest incomes from displacement of
cropland and forest Additional labour burden due to increased distance of forests and
greater dependence on purchased foodstuffs CSR practices and land compensation payments failed to benefit
those most negatively affected
THINKING beyond the canopy
Improving sector governance Avoided Deforestation
Stronger regulation of large-scale producers (policy orientations, bank credit lines, monitoring)
Support to increase smallholder yields Critical importance of full carbon accounting
Protection of Vulnerable Groups Controlled expansion of outgrower schemes (legal literacy, contracts,
proof of concept) Protection of customary land users: legal protection of rights +
negotiation process inc. detailed/written description of benefits and their distribution
Leveraging co-benefits Preferential hiring/benefits flows to customary rights holders and
land losing households Overcoming barriers to market entry by poorer households
THINKING beyond the canopy
Governing biofuel finance Apply sustainability criteria (i.e. EU RED) to all
forms of foreign public finance including investments by state-owned companies
Stimulate responsible investment among pension funds
Integrate sustainability issues in bank risk management
Make sustainability reporting mandatory Stimulate financial sector to set up
independent compliance and grievance mechanisms
THINKING beyond the canopy
Access to credible information Corporate lobbying (e.g. Alan Oxley, World Growth Institute (WGI)
and International Trade Strategies Global (ITS Global) vs NGO advocacy (e.g. Greenpeace and Wahli-FOE-Indonesia)
Key misconception – “..two thirds of forest clearance is driven by low-income people in poor countries”
‘An Open Letter about Scientific Credibility and the Conservation of Tropical Forests’ (Laurance et al, 25 October 2010) – “…significant distortions, misrepresentations, or misinterpretations of fact.”
WGI/ITS fails to comprehend or is failing to convey accurately the real and growing magnitude of industrial drivers as a threat to tropical forests.
Laurance, W.F. et al, 2010. ‘An Open Letter about Scientific Credibility and the Conservation of Tropical Forests’. http://conservationbytes.com/2010/10/25/wolvesinsheep’sclothing:industriallobbyistsandthedestructionoftropicalforests/
Oxley, A., 2010. Reaction (to above) from Alan Oxley. Available at: http://conservationbytes.com/2010/10/29/wolves-masquerading-as-sheep/
THINKING beyond the canopy
Policy options Target palm oil investments on degraded land
– requires improvements in spatial planning Increase yields by using inorganic nitrogen
fertilisers and/or POME as organic fertiliser – in Malaysia required new law prohibiting discharge into waterways
Collection of methane from POME treatment – CERs through CDM projects
Promote Palm Fatty Acid Distillate-based electricity production? (alternative uses include animal feed and soap industry)
Sources: Wicke et al, 2008 and 2011
THINKING beyond the canopy
www.cifor.org
Thank you