Ohio Assoc IS 5 Drivers of Ind School Demand
-
Upload
jeffery-wack-phd -
Category
Education
-
view
359 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ohio Assoc IS 5 Drivers of Ind School Demand
Independent School Demand:
What Can’t be Managed, What Can?
Ohio Association of Independent Schools
2008
Jeffery T. Wack, Ph.D.
What is demand?
What drives demand for private schools?
• Where we were.
• Where we are.
An Historical Overview
Remember the Late 1980s?
• Whip Inflation Now (WIN)
• Several years of recession
• Mortgage Rates: 11%
• “Black Monday” October 1987
• Post-Boomer birth-dearth
0%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Day
Boarding
Independent School Enrollment has Grown 20+
% since the early ’90s
Mostly due to new schools coming on line
24%
Number of U.S. students is down; international up
20 Years of Recovery
61%
32%
20% 20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Inquiries Apps/Enrollee Enrollment Giving
Increases in Indices of Demand
Source: NAIS StatsOnline
But N.A.I.S. Enrollment Growth Varies by Region (1993-2003)
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
East NewEngland
MiddleAtlantic
Midwest Southeast Southwest West
5 year
10 year
NAIS Statistics 1998, Vol 1.
OAIS Trends in Admissions – Slippage (Indicators, per enrolled student)
0123456789
10
Inquiries Apps Accepts
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Source: NAIS StatsOnline
What Has Driven Demand for Independent Schools?
This Devil’s Advocate’s View:
Affordability is not the Answer
Key Drivers of Market Demand
Government Policy Demographics Social Forces & Attitudes Competition Economics
External, Uncontrollable
Government Policies
The worse the public options, the better for private schools.
How much respect and confidence do you have in the Public schools?
58%
45%
39%
49%
11%15%
36%
42%40%40%39%
22% 22% 23%22% 19%
22%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1995 1997 1998 1999
Great Deal of Confidence Very Little Confidence
Gallup Organization
And what have been governments’ responses to concerns about public education?
19% 21% 16%23%
16%24% 20% 21%
37%
14%
Public and Parents Are Divided on No Child Left Behind
Very favorable Somewhat favorableVery unfavorable Somewhat unfavorable
Q.13
45%38%
43% 41% 41% 43%
2005 2007 Adults whotook surveyin Spanish
48%40%
Attitudes toward No Child Left Behind
2006 K-12 parents
67%
24%
General public
49%38%
Teachers and Administrators Are Firmly Opposed to NCLB
Very favorable Somewhat favorableVery unfavorable Somewhat unfavorable
Q.13
20%
77%
33%
63%
Attitudes toward No Child Left Behind
Public school teachers
Public school administrators
Grades for the Nation’s Schools Remain at ‘C’
Q.10
A
B
C
D
F
GPA
2001
2%
18%
51%
16%
3%
2.0
2003
2%
29%
47%
13%
2%
2.2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - General Public - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Nation’s Schools
Spring 2007
2005
3%
23%
46%
15%
4%
2.1
2006
5%
26%
44%
15%
5%
2.1
2002
2%
14%
50%
21%
4%
1.9
2004
2%
20%
47%
15%
4%
2.0
2007
4%
23%
44%
16%
5%
2.0
Grades for the Nation’s Schools Remain at ‘C’
Q.10
A
B
C
D
F
GPA
2004
2%
20%
48%
14%
3%
2.0
2001
8%
35%
33%
13%
4%
2.3
- - - - - - - K-12 Parents - - - - - -Publicschool
teachers
Education Stakeholders’ Report CardThe Nation’s Schools
Spring 2007
2006
5%
26%
45%
14%
4%
2.1
2005
4%
27%
46%
12%
2%
2.2
2007
4%
25%
43%
16%
4%
2.1
2007
4%
33%
41%
10%
1%
2.3
2007
1%
41%
42%
4%
0%
2.4
Public schooladministrators
Grades for One’s Own School: Better – But Still Not Great
Q.6, 8, 9
Public School Stakeholders’ Report CardMy Children’s School/My School(s)
Spring 2007
A
B
C
D
F
GPA
Publicschool
teachers
27%
52%
17%
2%
1%
3.0
Public schooladministrators
32%
57%
8%
1%
0%
3.2
Publicschoolparents
26%
41%
21%
8%
3%
2.8
2%8%
13%8%
20%9%10%
12%13%
12%
21%13%13%
18%
23%26%
27%39%
One or two biggest reasons for public schools' problemsOne or two best changes to solve public schools' problems
Public School Problems and Their Solutions
Lack of/need more parental involvement
Lack of/need more classroom discipline
Lack of funding/increase funding
Large class sizes/reduce class sizes
Low standards & expectations forstudents/raise standards & expectations
Unmotivated teachers/incentives to motivate teachers
Too few/need more qualified teachers
Lack of/need more challenging/ interesting schoolwork
Lack of consistent measures of student learning/increase testing
Q.11a,b
General Public
• Variability• Still Large Not individualized• Bureaucratic • Safety• The “Good Kids in the Middle”• Buildings vs Program
In Short, Dissatisfaction Persists
What portion of apps to your school reflects affirmative choice vs. lack of viable public options?Q:
Kid Demographics
If they aren’t there, they can’t apply.
Projected Population Growth by State
U.S. Births by Year
2,500
2,700
2,900
3,100
3,300
3,500
3,700
3,900
4,100
4,300
4,500
1951
1954
1957
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
Graduating high school 2009
Entering elementary
19%
23%
4%2%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1988-2002 2002-2014(proj)
U.S. School Enrollment Trends
PK-89 to 12
Note the Dramatic Change
in Rate of Growth
= 1.5%/year
= 0.3%/year
But Trends Depend
on Where you Are
The Warmer, the Better
Percentage Change in the Population of Children in Ohio
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
1990 to 2000 2004 to 2009
0 to 4 5 to 14 14 to 19
Table A. Projected percent increases in public elementary and secondary school enrollment, by state: 2001 to 2013
Alaska 17.0 Virginia 4.3
Hawaii 16.1 South Dakota 2.6
California 15.7 New Jersey 2.5
Idaho 15.1 Michigan 2.4
New Mexico 14.9 Tennessee 2.4
Nevada 13.8 Nebraska 2.0
Wyoming 13.1 Rhode Island 1.9
Utah 12.7 Delaware 1.8
Arizona 12.0 Maryland 1.7
Texas 11.2 Kansas 1.4
Colorado 8.8 Illinois 1.2
Georgia 6.8 South Carolina 0.9
Washington 5.7 Missouri 0.5
Oregon 5.4 Indiana 0.4
Florida 5.4
Montana 4.6
SOURCE: U.S. Dept. of Education, NCES: Common Core of Data surveys and State Public Elementary and Secondary Enrollment Model. (See reference table 5.)
Table B. Projected percent decreases in public elementary and secondary school enrollment, by state: 2001 to 2013
New Hampshire -0.2
North Carolina -0.9
Wisconsin -1.1
Minnesota -1.2
Iowa -1.6
Alabama -1.7
Oklahoma -1.7
Pennsylvania -1.9
Massachusetts -2.4
Maine -2.4
Mississippi -2.4
District of Columbia -2.8
Connecticut -2.8
Arkansas -2.9
Ohio -3.2
Vermont -3.2
New York -3.5
North Dakota -4.5
Kentucky -5.5
West Virginia -6.1
Percentage Change from 2000 to 2009
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
Cincinnati Cleveland/Akron Columbus Dayton Toledo
Children Aged 0 to 13 Adults with Graduate Degrees
Average Household Income (inflation adjusted)
Ohio Kid Demo Projections Included as Handout
• Ohio Overall: Downward– 0-4: +.5%– 5-9: -7.1%– 10-14: -.7%– 15-17: -1.4%
• But some counties are “hot” e.g.– Delaware– Warren– Union
Good News:
Schools’ Alumni “Markets” are Growing
Living Yale Alumni at Selected Years
0
50000
100000
150000
1700 1800 1850 1900 1950 1975 2000
Year
Competition
The choices used to be few.
Public Assigned76%
Now • Home Schooling
• Public Charters
• Public Magnets
• Soon: Proprietaries
Public Choice14%
Then
Private Religious
8%
Independent
2%
Public, Parochial, or Private?
Ohio “Community Schools” Enrollment is Growing
010,00020,00030,00040,00050,00060,00070,00080,00090,000
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/Templates/Pages/ODE/ODEDetail.aspx?Page=3&TopicRelationID=662&ContentID=41601&Content=41601
Variety of Newer Tuition-Charging Schools
• Niche Segment Schools– Therapeutics– Nations Academy
• Religious Schools– Catholic– Christian and other
• Price Gap Schools– Proprietaries (“Southwest Airlines”)
Ford Mustang V6:
1975 = $3,200
2005 = $20,000
Increase = 625%
Duke Tuition:
1975 = $2,780
2005 = $32,600
Increase = 1,173%
Independent Schools compete with colleges for today’s share-of-dollar for
education (e.g., 529 plan)
My summer 1974 earnings at Holiday Inn:
$4/hr * 40 hrs/week * 12 weeks = $1,920
Boy is 6 years old
Will attend 4 years of private college with average tuition and R&B
Models says start saving $15,400/year NOW
And More Competition for Alumni Dollars
41782
97156
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
National
1995 2006
* Excludes higher education.
Number of registered non-profits in education* has doubled since 1995:
Social Forces and Parent Attitudes
My mom thinks we’re nuts!
Parents Determine Primary Demand
Students Choose the (High) School
The “Purchase Decision”
“Suppose the government would pay all tuition. Which
school would you choose?”
Harvard Kennedy School/ NPR/Kaiser poll 2003
Asked of Public School Parents:
Q:
Same school 66%
Religious/ Parochial
13%
Other Public
6%
Don’t know
6%Non-religious
Private 9%
Similar question asked of parents in NAIS national public opinion polls (1999, 2007) finds that 1/3 would opt for an independent school, 1/10 a religious school, if cost and distance were non-factors
Realities of Today’s IS Parent
• Work environment is pay-for-performance– Employment has become precarious
– Their world is already flattening
• More knowledge shifts balance of power– Parents are experienced education customers
– Professionally successful
• Less trust– Cultural message of the benefits of more parent
involvement
• Brand conscious less time to shop?
• ISs fit with the luxury brands
• Less confident that their child can achieve what they have
• Ends-oriented College Craziness
Uncertainty Fear Strive for Control
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
19
72
19
74
19
76
19
78
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
20
04
20
07
SAT Test Takers 1972-2007
YearEnroll in college right after high school: 1975=51% 2008=69% Source: National Science Board report 2008
Number of College Applications per Student Up 30% (1997-2007)
SOURCE: HERI at UCLA College Freshman Survey
Average # apps filed:
1997=2.9
2007=3.7
1997:
1,100,000 SAT takers x 2.9 Apps =
3.2 Million Applications
2007:
1,520,000 SAT takers x 3.7 Apps =
5.6 Million Applications!
Why Parents, Seniors (and College Counselors) Have Gone Crazy:
67% Increase in College Apps in Less than 10 Years!
Applications to Yale
0
2500
5000
7500
10000
12500
15000
17500
20000
22500
25000
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2007
There has been essentially 0% change in the number of Ivy League freshman spaces since 1985.
0
100
200
300
400
5001
981
19
85
19
89
19
93
19
97
20
01
20
05
20
09
New England
New York
Other East of Miss.
West of Miss.
U.S. Poss and Foreign
Source: Yale OIR
“I went to Yale….why can’t you get my child into Yale?!”
Origins of Yale Freshman Matriculants (Classes of 1981-2009)
College Counseling is a Marketing Issue
Write your estimate of the acceptance rates (% of applicants offered admission) at the following universities:
Case Western Reserve
Denison
Northwestern
Ohio State
Wake Forest
Yale
College Counseling is a Marketing Issue
Write your estimate of the acceptance rates (% of applicants offered admission) at the following universities:
Case Western Reserve = 67%
Denison = 39%
Northwestern = 30%
Ohio State = 68%
Wake Forest = 44%
Yale = 9%
Per US News & WR
Family Economics
The Story as of Summer 2007
Average High/Upper School Tuition Trend
$0$2,000$4,000$6,000$8,000
$10,000$12,000$14,000$16,000$18,000
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2005
Do
llars
Source: NAIS
+30%
+23%
Pricing Context
Year
-76
374457
100
129
160
269
311315
-80
200
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350H
ealt
h In
sur
Cab
le T
V
Uni
v of
Con
n
Med
ian
Hom
e
Bw
ay S
how
Car
s
GE
Was
her
Pepe
's P
izza
Ban
anas
Slee
p So
fa
Air
Tra
vel
Lon
g D
ista
nce
Tec
h D
evic
es
By JTWack and Company from data appearing in the Hartford Courant (1/29/06)
Changes in Prices Relative to 82% Inflation
(1985-2005)
Products/Svcs that overshot the 82% increase in CPI
Hourly Worker Pay = 81%
Products/Svcs whose prices increased less than CPI
Indep Sch Grade 9 = 205%
CPI Increase = 82% (1985-2005)
US Families by Income (2005 Est Based on
Census Data)
Income Range
Families (000s) % of Total
Cumul % Percentile
Less than $35,000 21,700 28% 28% 0%
$35,000-$49,999 12,700 16% 44% 28%
$50,000-$74,999 17,500 23% 67% 44%
$75,000-$99,999 11,100 14% 81% 67%
$100,000-$124,999 6,200 8% 89% 81%
$125,000-$149,999 3,300 4% 93% 89%
$150,000-$199,999 2,600 3% 96% 93%
$200,000-$350,000 2,900 3% 99% 96%
$350,000+ 780 1% 100% 99%
Median
Full-pay
The Vanishing Upper Middle Class
25%
33%
45%
Median Tuition as a Percentage of Median Family Income
19902005
2015?!
Federal Reserve Board Survey of Consumer Finances 2006
Income Growth by Income Segment
020
4060
80100120
140160
180200
Middle Quintile(40-60%)
2nd Decile (80-90%)
Top Decile (90-100%)
$ th
ou
san
ds
Median Income 1995 Median Income 2004
Income Growth
Net Worth Growth by NW Segment
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
Middle Quintile(40-60%)
2nd Decile (80-90%)
Top Decile~$150K+ (90-
100%)
$ th
ou
san
ds
Median NW 1995 Median NW 2004
Federal Reserve Board Survey of Consumer Finances 2006
Growth in Net Worth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2004
* Top 3 officers in the 50 largest U.S. companies. Source: Saks, Federal Reserve; Frydman, Harvard 2006
Top Executive* IncomeMedian Income of Top Executives in the 50 Largest U.S.
Companies Relative to the Average Worker’s Pay
# of times Avg Worker’s Pay
27.4
12.4
7.8
0.5
38.8
15.9
9
0.10
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Middle 2nd Decile Top Decile CEO Pay
Tu
itio
n's
% o
f In
com
e
1995 2005
For the top ~5% of households, independent schools have become cheaper
Change in Average Tuition as a Percentage of Household Income
(1995-2005)
• National Retail Sales: +3-5% Annually
• Luxury Sales: +10%-20% Annually– Coach Same-Store Year-over-Year Sales:
+20% each of 2005 and 2006– Netjets, Luxury cars, Viking ranges sales
records– Record real estate and art sales
U.S. Luxury Sales Had Been in a Steep Climb
But this peaked
• Housing headed south in late 2006
• Luxury goods sales slowed in summer of 2007
….and things have surely changed this year
So, Which Way is the Wind Blowing in Ohio and Your Market?
Government Policy
Demographics
Social Forces & Attitudes
Competition
Economics