Ohc Somatic Supp
-
Upload
signedzero -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Ohc Somatic Supp
-
8/14/2019 Ohc Somatic Supp
1/5
b
c d
a
20 30 40 50 60 70
Stimulus frequency (kHz)
10
100
1000
10000
B M g a
i n r e m a
l l e u s
CFR1 R2
20 30 40 50 60 70
Stimulus frequency (kHz)
-4.0-3.5-3.0-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5
B M p
h a s e r e m a
l l e u s
( c y c
l e s )
10
20
30
40
5060
70
B M t h r e s
h o
l d ( d B
S P L )
CFR1 R2
Supplementary Figure: Additional data from single preparations illustrating
basilar membrane responses to acoustic stimulation of the mouse cochlea.
Threshold frequency tuning curves (open symbols), referred to the malleus,
measured from the basal turn BM in the cochleae of (a) a Tecta+/+
and (b) a
Tecta ENT/ ENT mouse. The phase of BM displacement relative to the motion of the
malleus (solid symbols) measured 15 dB above threshold are also shown, relative
to the right vertical axis. (c, d). Basilar membrane displacement divided by malleus
displacement as a function of stimulus frequency measured from (c) the Tecta +/+
mouse used for (a) for tones at levels between 20 60 dB SPL in 5 dB steps and
(d) the Tecta ENT/ ENT mouse used for (b) for tones at levels between 48 80 dB
SPL in 2 dB steps. Black traces in (c and d) are for the highest levels. Vertical
dashed lines indicate characteristic frequency (CF), estimated CF (CF e ), R2, and
R1 frequencies.
20 30 40 50 60 70
Stimulus frequency (kHz)
10
100
1000
10000
B M d i s p
l a c e e n
t /
m a l
l e u s
d i s p
l a c e m e n
tCFeR2
20 30 40 50 60 70
Stimulus frequency (kHz)
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
B M p h a s e r e m a l
l e u s
( c y c
l e s )
20
30
40
50
6070
80
B M t h r e s h o l
d ( d B S P L )
CFeR2
-
8/14/2019 Ohc Somatic Supp
2/5
-
8/14/2019 Ohc Somatic Supp
3/5
Electrophysiological recording and stimulation
We adopted Nuttall and Rens 2 technique to deliver extracochlear electrical stimulation and
to record cochlear microphonic and compound action potentials using either a silver, or a
tungsten electrode placed on the round window and a Ag/ AgCl reference electrode in the
neck tissue.
Sodium salicylate application
Sodium salicylate was applied as a crystal on the round window membrane for 5 minutes.
This technique, and not cochlear perfusion, was employed to avoid cochlear sensitivity
reduction when the round window is breached. We were therefore unable to quantify the
concentration of salicylate in the perilymph. Enhancement of the CM due to increases in the
basolateral and not the mechanoelectrical conductance of the OHCs, which occur when the
level of salicylate in the perilymph exceeds ~ 2mM 3, were not however observed.
Sound system and electrical stimulation
The sound system, its calibration in dB SPL re 2 x 10 -5 Pa, and the method of
generating computer-controlled command voltages, have been described 1, 4, but here we
used a custom-built condenser loudspeaker 5. For electrical stimulation the loudspeaker was
unplugged and the output signal from the GPIB-controlled attenuator was used as the
command voltage for a custom-built current-pump with a sensitivity of 100 A/V. The
-
8/14/2019 Ohc Somatic Supp
4/5
current pump delivered sinusoidal current of constant amplitude through the round window
electrode corresponding to the applied sinusoidal command voltage.
Basilar membrane measurements
BM displacements were measured by focusing the beam of a self-mixing, laser-
diode interferometer 6 through the round window membrane to form an ~5 m spot on the
centre of the BM in the 6065 kHz region of the cochlea as previously described 1, 6, 7 .
Experimental control, data acquisition, and data analysis were performed using
programs written in TestPoint (CEC).
All procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with UK Home
Office regulations with approval from the local ethics committee.
REFERENCES
1. Legan, P.K. et al. A targeted deletion in -tectorin reveals the tectorial membrane is
required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback. Neuron 28 , 273285 (2000).
2. Nuttall, A. L. & Ren, T. Electromotile hearing: evidence from basilar membrane
motion and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 92 , 170177 (1995).
3. Fitzgerald, J. J., Robertson, D. & Johnstone, B.M. Effects of intra-cochlear
perfusion of salicylates on cochlear microphonic and other auditory responses in theguinea pig. Hear. Res . 67, 147-56 (1993).
4. Russell, I. J., et al. Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically
modified tectorial membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 10 , 215-23 (2007).
5. Schuller, G. A cheap earphone for small animals with good frequency response in
the ultrasonic frequency range. J. Neurosci. Methods . 71 , 187-90 (1997).
-
8/14/2019 Ohc Somatic Supp
5/5
6. Murugasu, E. & Russell, I. J. Salicylate ototoxicity: the effects on basilar
membrane displacement, cochlear microphonics, and neural responses in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Audit. Neurosci . 1 , 139-150 (1995).
7. Lukashkin, A. N., Bashtanov, M. E. & Russell, I. J. A self-mixing laser-diode
interferometer for measuring basilar membrane vibrations without opening the
cochlea. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 122129 (2005).