©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working...

11
©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group

Transcript of ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working...

Page 1: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom

The Future of Regulation

David Clarkson

30th November 2005

Consult21 Broadband Working Group

Page 2: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 2

Disclaimer

• The contents of this presentation do not represent Ofcom’s view about the outcome of the forthcoming Wholesale Broadband Access market review.

Page 3: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 3

Agenda

• Overview of Current Regulatory Structure

• Ofcom’s Strategic Principles

• Current Products – Natural Selection

• LLU and FAS

• Next Generation Bit-stream

• Possible Future Regulatory Structure

• Ofcom’s High Level Goals

Page 4: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 4

Overview of Current Regulatory Structure

LLU

DataStream

IPStream

Geography

ex-post

ex-ante (Retail -)

ex-ante (Cost +)

Margin Rule

RetailCAct Case

Urban

Cost +

Rural

Page 5: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 5

Ofcom’s Strategic Principles

• Avoid reliance on exploiting arbitrage opportunities

• Promote competition at the deepest level of infrastructure where it will be effective and sustainable

– Where appropriate limit regulation to the ‘deepest’ level only, thus allowing the removal of downstream regulation

• Accommodate varying regulatory solutions for different products, and where appropriate, different geographies

– Where a single regulatory solution does not adequately address all geographies it may be appropriate to have different regulatory solutions in different geographies, rather than ‘stacking’ regulatory solutions along the value chain

Page 6: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 6

Current Products – Natural Selection!

Geography

LLUDSIPS LLU

DataStream

IPStream

UrbanRural

Page 7: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 7

LLU and FAS

• LLU is one of Ofcom’s primary regulatory solutions for promoting ‘deep’ infrastructure competition and where it is effective Ofcom is seeking to reduce/remove downstream regulation, but…

• Ofcom recognises that the economics of LLU are such that it is unlikely to be effective in all areas

– Therefore likely to need an additional ‘downstream’ regulatory solution that compliments LLU – Next Generation Bit-stream?

– Ofcom’s preference is for a single additional regulatory solution and this must be effective in all the areas where LLU is not

• FAS (as currently defined) appears to replicate DataStream (albeit using Ethernet instead of ATM)

– It is scale dependent and thus more attractive in urban areas, but this is where LLU is expected to be the preferred regulatory solution

– Unlikely to address all areas where LLU is not effective, in which case additional regulatory solution necessary

Page 8: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 8

Next Generation Bit-stream

• In order to be effective in all the areas where LLU is not, it seems likely that any Next Generation Bit-stream product will need to be sufficiently aggregated

– Multiple providers will need to share common network resources

• However there is normally a trade-off between aggregation and control/flexibility (as per IPStream v DataStream)

– IPStream is seen as an aggregated (fixed price) product but with limited flexibility

– DataStream is seen as a reasonably customisable product but is susceptible to scale economies

• It seems as though industry discussions, thus far, have accepted that aggregated and dedicated bit-stream products within 21CN will have similar cost and technical characteristics to IPStream and DataStream respectively

Ofcom is keen to understand whether this is necessarily the case

Page 9: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 9

De-regulate if LLU is effective

Possible Future Regulatory Structure

LLU

Next Gen Bit-stream

Downstream (w/s & retail) products

GeographyUrbanRural

Regulate if LLU is not effective

EoI

EoI

Page 10: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom 10

Ofcom’s High Level Goals

• What we would like to achieve

– Ensure that CPs have ability to innovate and produce differentiated downstream products

– Ensure that the correct incentives exist for CPs to deploy their own infrastructure

• What we would like to avoid

– Regulating multiple margins within a single value chain

• However, Ofcom does not have all the answers and is looking to industry (inc BT) to come up with options/solutions

– What do CPs want? (This is a different question than which of BT’s proposals is best!)

– What are the QoS capabilities of NGNs?

– There are likely to be trade-offs and as such industry may need to see if a suitable compromise can be found

Page 11: ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working Group.

©Ofcom

The Future of Regulation

Thank you

Consult21 Broadband Working Group