©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working...
-
Upload
edwina-hall -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of ©Ofcom The Future of Regulation David Clarkson 30 th November 2005 Consult21 Broadband Working...
©Ofcom
The Future of Regulation
David Clarkson
30th November 2005
Consult21 Broadband Working Group
©Ofcom 2
Disclaimer
• The contents of this presentation do not represent Ofcom’s view about the outcome of the forthcoming Wholesale Broadband Access market review.
©Ofcom 3
Agenda
• Overview of Current Regulatory Structure
• Ofcom’s Strategic Principles
• Current Products – Natural Selection
• LLU and FAS
• Next Generation Bit-stream
• Possible Future Regulatory Structure
• Ofcom’s High Level Goals
©Ofcom 4
Overview of Current Regulatory Structure
LLU
DataStream
IPStream
Geography
ex-post
ex-ante (Retail -)
ex-ante (Cost +)
Margin Rule
RetailCAct Case
Urban
Cost +
Rural
©Ofcom 5
Ofcom’s Strategic Principles
• Avoid reliance on exploiting arbitrage opportunities
• Promote competition at the deepest level of infrastructure where it will be effective and sustainable
– Where appropriate limit regulation to the ‘deepest’ level only, thus allowing the removal of downstream regulation
• Accommodate varying regulatory solutions for different products, and where appropriate, different geographies
– Where a single regulatory solution does not adequately address all geographies it may be appropriate to have different regulatory solutions in different geographies, rather than ‘stacking’ regulatory solutions along the value chain
©Ofcom 6
Current Products – Natural Selection!
Geography
LLUDSIPS LLU
DataStream
IPStream
UrbanRural
©Ofcom 7
LLU and FAS
• LLU is one of Ofcom’s primary regulatory solutions for promoting ‘deep’ infrastructure competition and where it is effective Ofcom is seeking to reduce/remove downstream regulation, but…
• Ofcom recognises that the economics of LLU are such that it is unlikely to be effective in all areas
– Therefore likely to need an additional ‘downstream’ regulatory solution that compliments LLU – Next Generation Bit-stream?
– Ofcom’s preference is for a single additional regulatory solution and this must be effective in all the areas where LLU is not
• FAS (as currently defined) appears to replicate DataStream (albeit using Ethernet instead of ATM)
– It is scale dependent and thus more attractive in urban areas, but this is where LLU is expected to be the preferred regulatory solution
– Unlikely to address all areas where LLU is not effective, in which case additional regulatory solution necessary
©Ofcom 8
Next Generation Bit-stream
• In order to be effective in all the areas where LLU is not, it seems likely that any Next Generation Bit-stream product will need to be sufficiently aggregated
– Multiple providers will need to share common network resources
• However there is normally a trade-off between aggregation and control/flexibility (as per IPStream v DataStream)
– IPStream is seen as an aggregated (fixed price) product but with limited flexibility
– DataStream is seen as a reasonably customisable product but is susceptible to scale economies
• It seems as though industry discussions, thus far, have accepted that aggregated and dedicated bit-stream products within 21CN will have similar cost and technical characteristics to IPStream and DataStream respectively
Ofcom is keen to understand whether this is necessarily the case
©Ofcom 9
De-regulate if LLU is effective
Possible Future Regulatory Structure
LLU
Next Gen Bit-stream
Downstream (w/s & retail) products
GeographyUrbanRural
Regulate if LLU is not effective
EoI
EoI
©Ofcom 10
Ofcom’s High Level Goals
• What we would like to achieve
– Ensure that CPs have ability to innovate and produce differentiated downstream products
– Ensure that the correct incentives exist for CPs to deploy their own infrastructure
• What we would like to avoid
– Regulating multiple margins within a single value chain
• However, Ofcom does not have all the answers and is looking to industry (inc BT) to come up with options/solutions
– What do CPs want? (This is a different question than which of BT’s proposals is best!)
– What are the QoS capabilities of NGNs?
– There are likely to be trade-offs and as such industry may need to see if a suitable compromise can be found
©Ofcom
The Future of Regulation
Thank you
Consult21 Broadband Working Group