Government of NeT of Delhi

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection BoardFe-IS. Institutional Area. Karkardooma. Delhi - 110092

Phone: 22370100 htt: dsssb.delhi.ov.in- -

No.F.SS (lSS)/Exam/DSSSB/2019/ ~ s~'-~-,...,"2- D.todi ~,l')I i I

ORDER

The following candidates were found using unfair means in theexamination for post code 89/17 (Asstt. Teacher) conducted by Delhi

Subordinate Service Selection Board. Further, DSSSB vide notice number 784

dated 28.06.2019 has debarred these candidates for a period of ten(10) years.

Now) Board' has decided to debar these candidates from future exams ofDSSSB for a period of is voa.,. w.e.f. ~a.O"."Olg.

Name of Exam:- Post Code S9/17'Asstt. Teacher in DOE)l. Reena devi Sh. Randhir Hno.227, In partial

Pest cede 89/17 Sinsh Main ChQwk, modlficliition of

Roll NO. Vil!·Sultanpur CC-I Branch111708902438 Dabas, Delhi A common notice no. 784

2. ManjJJ _Sh. Rajbir H.no.104, lady _' has dt. 28.06.2019, '

Post code 89/'i'7 Singh,. vpo- given 04 the

Roll NO. khanjhawala exams In cebarrement111708901304 Delhi place of period for these

--3. Jyotl Sh.Nanhe VPO, Rahat Rcena candldates mayPost code g9/17 Singh Sonipat Devi, be read as 15

Roll NO. Manju, years instead of111708922779 Jyoti & 10 YUillrlIi w.e.f.

4. ManJu Rana, Sh. Mahablr H.no.122, Maniu date mentionedPost Code 89/17 Rana, VPO, Ghevra, Rana. Thus in the saidRoll No. Near a case of notice.110208903162 Corporation impersona

6ank, Delhi, ucn,

The Candidates appearing in various examinations being conducted by

the DSSSB have' repeatedly been warned not to resort to any unfair means/malpractices and further, that:

«Any attempt to commit are abet, as the case may be all or any ofthe acts such as (iJ Impersonating, and {ii) Procuring impersonation by anyperson, may in addition to render himself! herself liable to criminal prosecution,

be liable;"

a) To be disqualified by the Board from the examination for

which he/she is a candidate as also from any otherexamination/selection of the Board in which he/ she mighthave appeared by the final result.' selection has not been

declared f made and orb) To be debarred either permanently or for a specified period

from any examination held or selection made by them and or,

c) To take disciplinary action if he/she is already in service underGoverrunen t and or,

d) To take any other legal action'Th\ls, it i~ clear that the candidate had arranged to have another person

taking examinations in place of her. Thus, the candidate and the impersonatorhave indulged in the following activities amounting to impersonation:

i) Appearing for examination for another candidate are arrangingto have another person taken an examination for the candidate.

ii) Allowing/Making somebody else to write answers on candidate's

behalf during examination.iH) Helping or receiving help from othor Q ndidates to trnperecriate.

iv) Signing/ getting signed the attendance sheet and cthrexamination documents on somebody else's behalf either partiallyor completely.

v) providing admit card to another person to enable him to appearon behalf of the candidate.

Further, These candidates have also indulged in the act of FORGERY byaltering the identity proof of candidates, admit cards etc, and produced thesedocuments to the examination conducting functionaries with the intent to

defraud, 'as the documents produced are materially different from the recordsavailable with the DSSSB.

Therefore, it is evident that the candidate alongwith irnper-soriator-,werea.ctively involv'ed"in the cr irrre : rel~ted to iIl'lperso~ation, cheating, forgery,

connivance and conspiracy as specified in Indian Penal Code.In view of above facts and circumstances, the DSSSB has come to the

conclusion that, prima. facie, a case of impersonation, cheating, forgery.connivance and conspiracy is made out against the candidates.

Further, attention is drawn to the following provisions of the "GeneralInstruction" for candidates for the various post Codes in online, offline & PET

examination.

If any case Of impersonation comes to notice then Overall Incharge& Observer shall lodged FIR agatnst both persons i.e. candidates

who applied and the, impersonator under relgvant sections. These

persons shall also be debarred from appearing in future exams of

DSSSB and other Board/ Commissions."

The DSSSB adheres to ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY TOWARDS ANY

Ml5CONDUCT by any candidate or 'any persons. Therefore, in view of the abovefacts and circumstances, the candidature of the above candidates who have

appeared in the examination is hereby cancelled, on finding them involved in

the acts as mentioned above in the table.

Further, the above candidates are hereby debarred from any examination

being conducted by the DSSSB for a period of 15 years w.e.f. 28.06.2019

mentioned against them in the table.

This issues with the prior approval of Competent Authority, DSSSB

GNCT of Delhi.

(Deputy Secretary)To,

1. Reena Devi D I 0 Randhir Singh, HNO. 227, Main Chowk, Vill-Sultaripur Dabas, Delhi:2. Manju, Dlo Rajbir Singh, HNo. 104, VPO-Kanjhawala, Delhi.3. Jyoti, DI0 Nanhe Singh, VPO-Rohtak, Sonipat.4. Manju Rana Dlo Mahabir Rana, HNO. 122, VPO-Ghcvra nearCorporation Bank, Delhi