Odontogenic keratocyst

44
ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYST Dr. Mayank Vermani PG 2 nd year Deptt. Oral & Maxillofacial Surg or KOT

Transcript of Odontogenic keratocyst

Page 1: Odontogenic keratocyst

ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYST

Dr. Mayank VermaniPG 2nd yearDeptt. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery

or KOT

Page 2: Odontogenic keratocyst

INTRODUCTION• Term by Philipsen in 1956

• Epithelial developmental cyst derived from enamel organ or dental lamina.

• Comprises 10-12 % of all cysts of jaw.

• WHO- “Keratocyst odontogenic tumour”

• Defined as benign uni or multicystic, intraosseous tumour of odontogenic origin, with a characterstic linning of parakeratenized stratified squamous epithelium which have potential for aggressive & infiltrative behaviour.

Page 3: Odontogenic keratocyst

UNIQUE

• Aggressive nature

• High recurrence rate

• Specific histopathological feature

• supported by reported cases.• Penetrates the cortical bone • May extend to the skull base from mandible or to

the orbit and infratemporal fossa from the maxilla. (J ORAL AND MAXILLOFAC SURG 64;308-

316:2006)

In 1976, Brannon proposed 3 mechanisms for KCOT recurrence: •incomplete removal of cyst lining,• growth of new KCOT from satellite cysts and• development of a new KCOT in adjacent area that is interpreted as a recurrence.

Page 4: Odontogenic keratocyst

FREQUENCY

Anywhere b/n 3-10.5% Shears found OKC’s about 11.2% in series of 2616 lessions 7-8% by Toller 11% by Marker

Bataineh & Mansour- 11% of all jaw cysts Dammer – 13% of all cysts

Page 5: Odontogenic keratocyst

Age –Peak in 2nd-3rd decade, 5th decade Sex – males> females (1.5:1) Site - mandible> maxilla

Dammer et al 3:1Stolinga no predilection

Mandi : maxi is 14:68 by stolinga. Half of keratocyst occurs at angle of mandible extends to asc ramus and body.

Page 6: Odontogenic keratocyst

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

• Pain, swelling, facial asymmetry or discharge, paresthesia or may be free of symptoms.

• Hard swelling with perforation of cortical plate

• Maxillary more tends to be infected.

• Aggressive odontogenic cyst, due to relatively high reoccurence rate, relatively fast growth & tendency to invade adjacent tissues.

Page 7: Odontogenic keratocyst

STOELINGA REPORTED AN IMPORTANT CHARACTERSTIC -

Lack of bony expansion ,

Follows a path of least resistance,

Tends to hollow out the mandible.

Thereby replacing bone marrow rather than giving rise to periosteal formations

Page 8: Odontogenic keratocyst

Bony fenestrations are seen on lingual side of OKC’s. rare because of the thick buccal plate to be resorbed.

Often associated with impacted or missing

Page 9: Odontogenic keratocyst

SYNDROMES ASSOCIATED WITH OKC

Gorlin goltz syndrome

○ Skin ○ Oral ○ Facial features○ Skeletal ○ CNS

Nevoid basal cell Carcinoma in pediatric patients(multiple OKC’s in 50%)

Page 10: Odontogenic keratocyst

Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome

(x- linked)Overgrowth Mental retardationBroad & coarse faceFlat frontal bone & mid-facial deficient with obvious

hypertelorism. Noonan Syndrome

Micrognathia, high arched palate, malocclusion, bifid uvula and rarely cleft palate

Page 11: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Genetic study – patched gene (PTCH) gene , tumour suppresor gene participates in tumourogenesis of sporadic neoplasm detected mutations in nevoid basal cell carcinoma

• Also called as benign cystic neoplasm because the loss of a tumour suppressor gene

Page 12: Odontogenic keratocyst

HISTOPATHOLOGY7 Histologic criterion

•Lining epithelium-• thin and uniform, lack of rete pegs,

parakeratinized(83%) surface

• Thin & mitotic activity is high like neoplasm

• If inflamed•Basal cell layer- well defined, palisaded layer, polarized picket fence or tombstone appearance.

Page 13: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Spinous cell layer- intracellular edema.

• Keratinization– parakeratotic but may be orthokeratotic

• Keratin layer- corrugated

• Fibrous cyst wall- thin & uninflamed.

• Metalloproteinase mediated degradation of collagen in juxta-epithelial regions.

• Connective tissue wall contains mucopolysaccharides, microcysts(20%) & epithelial islands(50%) and is free of inflamation

• Daughter or satellite cysts more common in syndromes• Lumen- cholesterol & hyaline bodies• Electrophoresis- low content of soluble protein

Page 14: Odontogenic keratocyst

• More aggressive? High mitotic count, higher turnover & active collagenase

• Angiogenesis is a feature of benign neoplasm evidence of this in OKC may account for the behaviour

Page 15: Odontogenic keratocyst

IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

• Variety of immunohistochemical markers including CEA,p53 protein, lectin, lactoferrin, HPV , EGF.

• Cytokeratin 18 staining was more common in non syndromic patient, c 17 did not

• Emmprin level was significantly higher in epithelial linning

• In general PCNA, Ki 67 & p53 positive

• PTCH gene mutation is an important step in pathogenesis

Page 16: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Two hit hypothesis-arises from precursor cells that contains an inherited first hit

• Then only a single mutation required in somatic cell to cause homozygous inactivation and neoplastic progression

• sporadic OKC’s might arise from susceptible cells in which two somatic mutations have occurred , one manifests as allelic loss.

• Loss of tumour suppresor genes supports the view that OKC is a benign neoplasm.

Page 17: Odontogenic keratocyst

RADIOGRAPHS

Page 18: Odontogenic keratocyst

STOELINGA JW(2001) DEVIDED RADIOGRAPHIC PRESENTATION OF OKC

• 4 CATEGORIES-

• UNILOCULAR i.e. a more or less round configuration with or without well defined radiographic margin.

• Scalloped i.e radiolucency with a festooned margin

• Mulilobular i.e. two or more lobes were seen with no bony septae dividing the lobes.

• Multilocular i.e. separate locules were seen seemingly divided by bony septae

Page 19: Odontogenic keratocyst

• No expansion of bone at all both lingual and buccal expansion may occur

• Roseberg et al found some degree of expansion in all case, large sized unilocular lession showed minimal expansion.

• Downward displacement of inferior alveolar canal and resorption of the lower cortical plate of mandible may be seen

• Mental foramen may not be seen . Rosenberg et al reported one case in which there was superior displacement of mandibular canal

Page 20: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Scalloping of border common,Ill defined periphery

• EFFECTS- displacement of impacted

• Resorption, Extrution, Mobility

• 1/3rd have lingual expansion

Page 21: Odontogenic keratocyst

TREATMENT

-CONSERVATIVE -RADICAL

Page 22: Odontogenic keratocyst

ADVANTAGES OF CONSERVATIVE THERAPY

• Preservation of bone, soft tissue and teeth.

• Avoid damage to the adjacent anatomic structures.

• Reduction in cost, hospital admission and reconstruction procedures.

• Functional integrity is maintained.

• Reconstruction itself has failures/pitfalls.

Page 23: Odontogenic keratocyst

Various Conservative treatment modalites are:

Enucleation enucleation alone enucleation followed by curettage

- Curettage with physical mean (Sharp Curette, Rotary bur) - Curettage with chemical mean (Carnoy’s solution) - Curettage with Thermal (Cryosurgery)

Decompression Decompression and irrigation Decompression and marsupialization

Marsupialization Marsupialization followed by enucleation

Peripheral ostectomy

Page 24: Odontogenic keratocyst

Enucleation : It is defined as “to remove whole or clean, as a tumor from its envelope.”

Curettage : defined as “the removal of growths or other material from the

wall of a cavity . . . as with a curette.

Marsupialization : It implies the exteriorization of a cyst or an enclosed cavity by resecting a portion of its wall and suturing the cut edges of the remaining wall to adjacent soft tissue, thereby creating a pouch.

Decompression : It is accomplished by opening into a cystic cavity, followed by placement of a drainage tube to allow the opening to persist.

According to Tucker et al : “Decompression and marsupialization, although serving the same function and relying on the same basic principle of bone regeneration, are two entirely different techniques as marsupialisation is a one-stage operation; decompression is a two-stage procedure.

Page 25: Odontogenic keratocyst

EnucleationStudies show that the recurrence rate with alone

Enucleation is high so it is performed with adjunctive therapies.

Treatment No. of patients No. of recurrences

(%)

Enucleation 58 12 20.7

Marsupialization 10 4 40.0

Total 68 16 23.5

(Oral Oncology 46 (2010) 740–742)

Table: Recurrence by treatment modality.

20.7

Page 26: Odontogenic keratocyst

Table . RECURRENCE (J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:635-639, 2005)

Recurrence by treatment No. Of Recurrences/ Treatments

%Recurrences/ Treatments

Enucleation 6/11 54.5

Peripheral ostectomy 2/11 18.2

Peripheral ostectomy and Carnoy’s solution

0/13 0

Enucleation and Carnoy’s solution

1/2 50

Resection 0/3 0

Recurrence by individual treatment

Peripheral ostectomy 2/24 8.3

Carnoy’s solution 1/15 6.7

Enucleation 7/13 53.8

Resection 0/3 0

54.5

Page 27: Odontogenic keratocyst

ADJUNCTIVE THERAPHIES

Enucleation followed by curettage

- Curettage with physical mean (Sharp Curette, Rotary bur)

- Curettage with chemical mean (Carnoy’s solution)

- Curettage with Thermal (Cryosurgery)

Page 28: Odontogenic keratocyst

TREATMENT OF ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYSTS BY ENUCLEATIONAND CARNOY’S SOLUTION.

Treatment type Cysts reported No. recurrences (%)

Curettage 265 19.2

Enucleation alone 387111 28.7

Enucleation and Carnoy’s* 601 1.6

Radical enucleation 61 16.7

Enucleation and cryotherapy

165 31.3

Marsupialisation 4511 24.4

Resection 380 0

1.6

Table : Recurrence rate

Page 29: Odontogenic keratocyst

Enucleation and carnoy’s sol cont…..

• It act as cauterizing agent that denaturates proteins, nucleic acid and almost all other organic molecules.

• Penetrates tissue and cause rapid local fixation.

• Eliminate residual epithelial remnants that left after enucleation.

• Applied for 3 min before enucleation.

(Clinic Oral Invest ,14;27-34:2010)

Page 30: Odontogenic keratocyst

USE OF ENUCLEATION AND LIQUIDNITROGEN CRYOTHERAPY

• Liquid nitrogen kill the epithelial remnants or satellite cysts.

• Intact osseous frame work allows osteoconduction.

• Cryosurgery causes necrosis in bone and cell death (below 20°C ) by forming intracellular and extracellular ice crystal plus osmotic and electrolyte disturbances.

• Relative lack of bleeding and scarring.

• Due to difficulty in controlling the amount of liquid nitrogen applied to the cavity, the resultant necrosis and swelling can be unpredictable.

(J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:720-725, 2001)

Page 31: Odontogenic keratocyst

USE OF METHYLENE BLUE FOR PRECISE PERIPHERAL OSTECTOMY OF KERATOCYSTIC ODONTOGENIC TUMOUR

• After the tumour has been enucleated, the surface of the bone cavity is dyed with a 1% solution of methylene blue.

• The bone stains heavily and peripheral ostectomy is possible that will remove any residual peripheral neoplastic tissue.

(British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 49 :e84–e85, 2011)

Page 32: Odontogenic keratocyst

DECOMPRESSION AND IRRIGATION

Growth of cysts is believed to occur by a combination of osmotic pressure and pressure resorption, coupled with release of prostaglandins and growth factors.

Decompression decreases the amount of interleukin that is released.

Disadvantages

• Selected group of patients treated.

• Cooperation of the patient is required.

• Frequent return to hospital is required.

• At least 19 months are required for treatment.

(J oral and Maxillofac Surg, 62:651,2004)

Page 33: Odontogenic keratocyst

DECOMPRESSION AND MARSUPIALIZATION

the earliest advocated treatment.

first suggested by Partsch (Partsch 1 procedure)

the partsch 2 procedure is enucleation and primary closure)

Page 34: Odontogenic keratocyst
Page 35: Odontogenic keratocyst
Page 36: Odontogenic keratocyst

What Marsupialization/Decompression does?

• higher levels of interleukin-1 (an inflammatory,

multifunctional cytokine) decrease

significantly after marsupialization.

(J Oral Pathol Med 31:526,2002)

• Post decompression specimen indicating a return to more normal oral epithelium.

(J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:935, 2000)

Page 37: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Resolution of the lesions with a recurrence rate of 0%. with marsupialization and decompression

(J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:651, 2004)

Page 38: Odontogenic keratocyst

MARSUPIALIZATION FOLLOWED BY ENUCLEATION

• Marsupialization followed by enucleation can be performed for any reduced OKC small enough to be removed completely.

• It is also reserved for cases in which the cyst size has not decreased significantly after a certain point.

Page 39: Odontogenic keratocyst

THE SONIC HEDGEHOG (SHH) PATHWAY

• Alterations in the SHH signaling pathway genes cause a number of developmental defects.

(Medical Hypotheses (2006) 67, 1242–1244)

Page 40: Odontogenic keratocyst

INHIBITION OF SHH SIGNALING PATHWAY BY CYCLOPAMINE (MOLECULAR TREATMENT STRATEGY OF ODONTOGENIC KERATOCYST)

Cyclopamine

( Genes Dev. 2002 16: 2743-2748)

Page 41: Odontogenic keratocyst

RESECTION

• Three different types of resections (mostly applicable for the mandible) can be performed:

• En bloc resection or a marginal (segmental) resection without disruption of the bone continuity

• Partial resection with the continuity defect

• Total resection ( maxillectomy, mandibulectomy ) in extreme cases.

Page 42: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Enbloc resection or resection without continuity defects is the removal of the lesion and of a defined measureable perimeter of adjacent bone along with the lesion while the bony continuity is maintained36

• Serious consideration should be given to en bloc resection in the following cases: 1) when OKC recurs despite previous enucleation with an adjunctive procedure;

• 2) when OKC recurs despite previous marsupialisation followed by enucleation with an adjunctive procedure;

• 3) in cases of multilocular (multilobular) aggressive intraosseous OKC;

• 4) in cases of multiple nonsyndromic and syndromic keratocysts of nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome; or

• 5) in a diagnosed OKC exhibiting particularly aggressive clinical behavior (eg, growth, destruction of adjacent tissues) that should require resection as the initial surgical treatment

Page 43: Odontogenic keratocyst

• Bataineh et al (1998) found following advantages of treatment of keratocyst by resection with continuity defects:1. Eradication of the pathologic lesion 2. Reduction of the potential for recurrence3. Preservation of the continuity of the mandible,

• Thus ,maintaining jaw function and shape.

Page 44: Odontogenic keratocyst

RECURRENCE

Recurrence rate of OKC has been reported to range from5% ,58.3%(Myoung et et al)72to 100%(Blanas et al).67

•High rate of recurrence likely comes from -presence of remnants of residual epithelial islands and/or

satellite or daughter cysts (microcysts) in the adjacent overlying attached mucosa, - connective tissue of the cyst wall, or an adjacent osseous margin.

•Other causes of recurrence - the thin and fragile cystic lining, a high mitotic index of

the epithelial cells and elevated prostaglandin levels.