OCTA INNOVATION Compendium of EU Innovation Good...

59
Project funded by Territorial strategies for innovation project Brussels-based office +32 2 280 44 98 www.octa-innovation.eu - innovation@octa- innovation.eu OCTA INNOVATION Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice 25.10.2015

Transcript of OCTA INNOVATION Compendium of EU Innovation Good...

  • Project funded by Territorial strategies for innovation project Brussels-based office +32 2 280 44 98 www.octa-innovation.eu - [email protected]

    OCTA INNOVATION

    Compendium

    of

    EU Innovation Good Practice

    25.10.2015

    http://www.octa-innovation.eu/

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    1

    Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................................... 3

    INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4

    APPROACHES TO S3 PLATFORM / RIS3 SMART SPECIALISATION ......................................................... 5

    Smart Specialisation S3 Platform ....................................................................................................... 5

    EU Island Territorial Regional Economies ........................................................................................... 6

    Azores ........................................................................................................................................... 6

    Balearic Islands .............................................................................................................................. 6

    Canary Islands ............................................................................................................................... 7

    Cornwall and Isles of Scilly ............................................................................................................. 8

    Crete ............................................................................................................................................. 8

    Cyprus ........................................................................................................................................... 9

    La Réunion Island ........................................................................................................................ 10

    Sicily ............................................................................................................................................ 11

    EU Mainland Territorial Regional Economies................................................................................ 12

    Algarve ........................................................................................................................................ 12

    Alsace .......................................................................................................................................... 13

    Aragόn......................................................................................................................................... 14

    Basque Country ........................................................................................................................... 14

    Bratislava..................................................................................................................................... 16

    Castilla y Leόn .............................................................................................................................. 16

    Centre-France .............................................................................................................................. 17

    Croatia......................................................................................................................................... 18

    East Sweden ................................................................................................................................ 20

    Estonia ........................................................................................................................................ 20

    Friesland ...................................................................................................................................... 21

    Languedoc-Roussillon .................................................................................................................. 23

    Latvia........................................................................................................................................... 23

    Lower Austria .............................................................................................................................. 24

    Lubelskie ..................................................................................................................................... 26

    Marche ........................................................................................................................................ 27

    Mazovia ....................................................................................................................................... 27

    Moravia-Silesia ............................................................................................................................ 29

    Nordland ..................................................................................................................................... 29

    Piedmont ..................................................................................................................................... 30

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    2

    Pomorskie ................................................................................................................................... 31

    Puglia .......................................................................................................................................... 32

    Satakunta .................................................................................................................................... 33

    Slovenia ....................................................................................................................................... 33

    South Moravia ............................................................................................................................. 34

    Sterea Ellada................................................................................................................................ 35

    Tuscany ....................................................................................................................................... 36

    Umbria ........................................................................................................................................ 37

    Vojvodina .................................................................................................................................... 39

    Weser-Ems .................................................................................................................................. 40

    SMART SPECIALISATION CASE STUDIES ............................................................................................ 41

    ANNEX 1: Smart Specialisation – A Strategy for all Regions .............................................................. 48

    ANNEX 2: Recensements bonnes pratiques ..................................................................................... 50

    ANNEX 3: High Profile Examples of EU Good Practice ...................................................................... 51

    ANNEX 4: Lessons Learned from the RITTS scheme (2002) ............................................................... 54

    ANNEX 5: Priorities for the Improvement of Innovation Strategies .................................................. 57

    ANNEX 6: Further Reading and Reference Sources........................................................................... 58

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    3

    Abbreviations PC or pc Per capita / per capita

    AMT Advanced Manufacturing Technologies

    BERD Business Expenditure on Research and Development

    BSC Balanced Scorecard / Business Services Centre (according to context)

    CP On page 46 – check for meaning (Consumer Products?

    EPO European Patent Office

    EU-ISB EU Innovation Scoreboard

    GERD Gross Expenditure on Research and Development

    HAMHIT High and Medium-High Technology (e.g. sectors)

    HR Human Resources

    I&T Innovation and Technology

    I&TT Innovation & Technology Transfer

    Inst/s Institution / Institutions

    KET Key Enabling Technologies

    KIBS Knowledge-intensive Business Services

    KIT-ESPON Knowledge, Innovation, Territory Project – European Spatial Planning Observation Network

    KPI Key Performance Indicator

    MINT Management of Innovation and New Technology

    PESTLE or PESTEL

    Political, Economy, Society, Technology, Legal, Environment or Environment Legal

    Quadruple Helix

    As for Triple Helix but usually also engaging Civil Society and/or other key stakeholder groups in the process

    RDTI Research, Development, Technology and Innovation

    RES Renewable Energy Source

    RISB Regional Innovation Scoreboard

    RITTS Regional Innovation & Technology Transfer Strategies

    S&T Science & Technology

    SIDS Small Island Developing States

    SS Smart Specialisation

    STI Scientific and Technological Institutional facilities

    SWOT Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats

    Triple Helix Collaboration of University, Business and Government to enhance innovation capacity

    TWG Thematic Working Group

    USP Unique Selling Proposition

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    4

    INTRODUCTION The EU has a long history of funding support for research, development and innovation. The

    framework programme (FPs 1 – 7, now Horizon 2020) which started in 1984, the Regional

    Innovation Strategy and Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer Strategies programmes

    (RIS-RITTS) of the 1990s and first decade of C21, ERDF via the on-going INTERREG programmes to

    name only a few of the bigger programmes; and in more recent times the promotion of the S3

    Platform with its focus on support for RIS3 Smart Specialisation projects and ensuring that regions

    remain abreast of and successfully participate in present and foreseeable developments in

    technology and innovatory-driven economic growth.

    In effect, the EC and the individual MS together form a vast institutional memory bank and

    repository of knowledge related to the pursuit of innovation. That is the good news. The not so

    good news is the difficulty of finding and then accessing the appropriate data in a format that is

    both relevant and comprehensible to the need. This is especially true for small less favoured

    nations for whom the benchmarking of good international practice may have to take the place of

    indigenous applied RDI capacity.

    However, benchmarking should be approached with caution. The cases studied should be treated

    as sign-posts to solutions or lessons from which to learn rather than being transposed from one

    environment to another as carbon copies without making allowances for cultural differentiation.

    Learn from the methodology, not from the implementation. The Compendium of EU Innovation

    Good Practice is based on that precept. It also aims to be mainly contemporary in content.

    Hopefully it will also help to resolve some of these issues for the OCTs

    The first section focuses on the EU S3 Platform and 38 active RIS3 projects which includes 8 island

    economies. The tables provide a short profile of the concerned region’s economic and RDI

    capacity followed by data which present the essence of the project’s strategic priorities and the

    methodological structure that was adopted.

    The second section covers findings from a Smart Specialisation case study of 11 EU regions

    undertaken by Dr Raquel Ortega-Argilés of Groningen University. This document presents the

    analysis of a set of European regions that in recent years have undertaken processes of economic

    transformation in line with the objectives of Europe 2020 (sustainable, inclusive and smart growth

    strategies). The policy strategies share various features and patterns, but also exhibit differences

    related to historical and economic environment.

    The Annexes to the Compendium include an extract from a Smart Specialisation concept paper by

    DG REGIO (Annex 1); Special Reports by OCTA Innovation Experts (Annexes 2 and 3). Lessons

    Learned from 42 EU regions that participated in the Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer

    Strategies programme (Annex 4); and Priorities for the Improvement of Innovation Strategies

    (Annex 5). Annex 6 provides on-line links to a range of EU, OECD and other documents for further

    reading and reference.

    Milan Jezic von Gesseneck, Team Leader, Innovation Expert

    James Dick, Innovation Expert

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    5

    APPROACHES TO S3 PLATFORM / RIS3 SMART SPECIALISATION

    Smart Specialisation S3 Platform The S3 Platform assists EU countries and regions to develop, implement and review their

    Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3). Established in 2011 the role of

    the S3 Platform is to provide information, methodologies, expertise and advice to national and

    regional policy makers, as well as promote mutual learning, trans-national co-operation and

    contribute to academic debates around the concept of smart specialisation. Services include:

    Providing guidance material and good practice examples

    Organising information sessions for policy makers and participating in conferences

    Providing training to policy-makers

    Facilitating peer-reviews

    Supporting access to relevant data

    Participating in high quality research projects to inform strategy formation and policy

    making

    Registration on the S3 Platform is open to regional and national administrations of EU, candidate

    and neighbouring countries.1The S3 Platform is hosted by the Institute for Prospective

    Technological Studies (IPTS) in Seville, part of the European Commission's Joint Research

    Centre. It is made up of three main parts:

    A project management and research team at the IPTS.

    A Steering Team gathering representatives of several Commission Services

    A Mirror Group composed of leading academics and experts in the fields of innovation

    and regional development, as well as representatives of networks such as EURADA.

    ERRIN, EBN, OECD, European Cluster Observatory and European Cluster Alliance.

    The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the scientific and technical arm of the European Commission

    which produces multi-disciplinary research to inform EU policy challenges. Smart specialisation is

    an example of how theory and practice can inform each other and how the EU can draw on the

    wide range of academic expertise in the various institutes of the JRC.

    The Platform organises two main types of events: Outreach seminars in different European

    locations explain and promote the concept of smart specialisation to all interested regions and

    institutions; Workshops for registered regions address specific aspects of concern to regional

    policy makers. In addition, the Platform can support Member States in organising national events

    on Smart Specialisation.

    The Platform develops mutual trans-national learning tools shifting gradually from the more

    general assessment of national and regional smart specialisation strategies to more targeted

    "discussion paths" on specific themes, with regard namely to: (i) specific actors / stakeholders of

    the RIS3 (ii) common features of regions such as rural / urban areas, peripheral areas etc.; (iii)

    specific policy tools (such as governance setup, funding tools, cluster support, monitoring and

    evaluation, etc.; (iv) common RIS3 priorities of regions and countries. The website will be of use

    to anyone interested in smart specialisation. In addition, specially designed interactive tools are

    currently being designed as online resources for registered regions and countries.

    1The list of registered regions and countries can be found at: http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home

    http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    6

    EU Island Territorial Regional Economies

    Azores

    TERRITORY The Azores Region of Portugal

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 2,333 km2 / Exclusive Economic Maritime Zone 953,633 km2

    GDP: 15,197 € pc (2010) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: Expenditure 0.7% of GDP 1 University.

    Population: 246,746 (2011) Unemployment: Education: Tertiary education 9.9% (2011) Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (74%) Industry (17%) Agro and Fisheries (9%)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Focus investments on a limited number of priorities

    Upgrade and improve policy instruments

    Mobilise stakeholders participation in innovation processes

    Improve internal and external connections and positioning in EU and global value chains

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Methodological approach in 6 steps 1) Definition of Governance Structure i.e. Management team, Steering Group, Mirror group

    (small advisory group of experts), Thematic groups and Project-specific groups 2) Analysis of the regional context i.e. analysis of regional economy, society and innovation

    infrastructure with dimensions covering regional assets, EU and global linkages and the entrepreneurial environment. The process is one of looking beyond boundaries

    3) Mobilisation and promotion of entrepreneurial process of discovery i.e. the development of a shared vision through the quadruple helix model that draws in Regional Government, the University, the Business Community and Society.

    4) Selection of a limited number of priorities. The mail challenge is to strike a viable balance between bottom-up and top-down processes

    5) Define the strategy i.e. Policy mix, Roadmap and Action Plan. Strategy definition demands the close commitment of all relevant bodies and actors. Strategy definition leads to the conceptualisation and determination of Pilot Projects under an Action Plan

    6) Definition and implementation of Monitoring and Evaluation mechanisms

    Innovation Outcomes

    A strategic document setting the vision, priorities and action plan

    An Ongoing System for the permanent process of identification of opportunities and updating of the adopted strategy

    Balearic Islands

    TERRITORY Illes Balears (Balearic Islands) Region of Spain

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Plan for Science, Technology & Innovation Plan of the Balearic Islands 2009-2012 Government of the Balearic Islands

    Profile

    Area: 4,992km2

    GDP: 26,692 € pc (2.5% of national GDP) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 1 university (54.7% of RDI costs)

    Population: 1,119,000 (2012) Unemployment: 2.77% (2015) Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Tourism + Services (81%)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Prioritise areas of technology, markets and sectors where existing clusters work – in particular Tourism and its technology domains

    Prioritise Clusters as tools for knowledge generation according to market needs

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    7

    TERRITORY Illes Balears (Balearic Islands) Region of Spain

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Maximise and support the role of Tourism as an engine for regional development (indicators: 43% of GDP/30% of employment/81% of exports/39% of taxes)

    Cluster enhances tourism activities in different technology domains e.g. Creative Industries, Sea technologies, Life Science Biohealth, Media, Music, ICT

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Initiatives whereby Tourism stimulates economic activity and employment through ICT solutions that embrace travel agencies, tour promoters, airport services and air transport, accommodation, restaurants, sailing ports and marinas, marine transport

    Innovation Outcomes

    Tourism sector is main driver of the economy

    Tourism acts to integrate activity of technologies

    Tourism promotes development of specialised activities based on knowledge

    Lessons Learned

    Tourism requires the kind of policy that supports the ability to generate knowledge in an industry that does not create technology but uses it

    Canary Islands

    TERRITORY Canarias (Canary Islands) Region of Spain

    Data Source & Date

    RIS+ Innovative Actions ERDF Innovative Actions 2000-2002 DG Regional Policy

    Profile

    Area: 7447km2

    GDP: 19,806 € pc (41,732,769 € (2011) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 2 universities, RD centres, Technology Parks

    Population: 2,126,769 (2011) Unemployment: 30.8% Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Tourism

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Develop relevant technological resources

    Increase capacity to create innovative firms

    Coordinate institutional support for innovation waste management

    Strengthening local services and support network for the promotion of cultural tourism

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Support to the diffusion and marketing of technology centres and university research

    Design of Business Plans

    Access to private/public funding

    Website support for innovation

    Feasibility study for technology centre for furniture industry

    Innovation Outcomes

    Quality charter prepared for and adopted by technology transfer offices in universities and research centres

    Practical guide on the tax system for RDTI activities, including critical analysis of national incentives and recommendations

    5 year Innovation Action Program (NIAP)

    Portal to web-based services

    Lessons Learned

    Administrative difficulties caused significant delay

    RIS+ was good preparation for implementation of the NIAP

    Key role of digital platform for disseminating integrated support services for innovation will lead to further development of website portal and boosting of internet access in rural areas.

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    8

    Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    TERRITORY Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Regions of United Kingdom

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership

    Profile

    Area: 3,563km2 (coastline 697 km)

    GDP: 8.8 billion € (total economy value) Growth rate: 9% (2009) Energy: R&D: 2 universities, 3 Innovation Centres

    Population: 535,300 Unemployment: 15,000 (2011) Education: 27% (working age with NVQ4) Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Business Services

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: Leadership in in innovative business and low carbon technologies

    Green Economy – renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency

    SME Innovation and Competitiveness

    Smart, sustainable and inclusive growth

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Working with private and public sector partners. Public consultations.

    Encouraging new innovation and R&D into Cornwall

    Promote Business-University cooperation

    Invest in R&D and enterprise

    Bringing superfast broadband to Cornwall and Scilly Isles

    Focus on addressing low productivity across all sectors

    Focus on support for high value businesses

    Alignment with national agenda

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Areas for pilot activity include:

    Smart grid development

    Renewable energy technologies e.g. marine energy, floating wind and bio fuels

    Innovation Outcomes

    Businesses reach their national and global potential

    Great career opportunities attract the top-calibre talent

    Value created out of Knowledge

    Responsible use of the natural environment as a key economic asset

    Crete

    TERRITORY Crete Region of Greece

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 Regional Assessment (Smart Regional Specialisation) DG REGION (2012)

    Profile

    Area: 8,336 km2

    GDP: 19,900 € pc (85% of EU 27 average) Growth rate: GDP pc 1.24% (2009) Energy: R&D: 2 universities, 1 Technological Institute, 2 Research Centre. Regional Innovation Council. Modest-high innovator (RISB) Business R&D and patenting very low

    Population: 623,100 (5.5% of Greece (2011) Unemployment: 4.0% Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (80.75); Trade & Tourism (38%); Industry (13.8%)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision Strengthen competitiveness and enhance attractiveness of Crete in conditions of sustainable development Strategic Orientations

    Development and modernisation of physical infrastructure

    Strengthen productive investment, innovation and effective use of ICT

    Upgrade educational infrastructure, health and welfare

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    9

    TERRITORY Crete Region of Greece Sustainable environment management and enhancement of cultural heritage

    Enhance spatial and social cohesion and improve quality of life for residents Priorities of Research and Innovation policies

    Expansion of markets and technological and organisational modernisation

    Promote a culture of innovation

    Encourage internationalisation of enterprises Expansion of the productive base, creation of new jobs and competitiveness of tourism

    Cyprus

    TERRITORY Cyprus EU Member State

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept Leonidas Antoniou (rapporteur) National RIS3 Governing Board

    Profile

    Area: 9,251 km2 GDP: 19.9 billion € PC 22,582 € Growth rate: - 6.0% Energy: R&D: 3 public universities, 5 private universities

    Population: 900,000 Unemployment: 15.7% Education: Tertiary 25-64 age group 77.6% Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Tourism, Energy, Environment Agro-food, Construction, Transportation, Health

    Innovation Aims / St

    Policy – 3 Pillars (1) Smart Growth (2) Sustainable R&I System (3) Support for the R&I system

    Objectives

    Enhancement of the effectiveness of the RDTI system and its targeted interconnection with the production base through modernisation and technological diversity of the priority sectors

    Enhancement of economic competitiveness through the adoption of new forms of innovation and penetration into new markets

    Enhancement of the quality of life in Cyprus Strategy

    Promote an Innovation Quadruple Helix i.e. cooperation between institutions of higher education and research, enterprise, policy makers and key actors and stakeholders from the wider society.

    Increase participation of SMEs in RDTI-related activities

    Increase the private sector’s investment in RDTI process

    Improve the capacity, quality and ability of the RDTI institutions to support economic competitiveness and social advancement

    Increase research-related job opportunities and attract qualified scientists and engineers

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Desk Research e.g. Case studies, National and international economic and RDTI reports, Evaluation of RDTI programmes, Evaluation of participation in RDTI programmes, Statistical data for Cyprus and EU, Sectoral analyses

    Field Research e.g. Quantitative data, Questionnaires to enterprises, Qualitative data – interviews with opinion leaders and focus groups

    Public Consultation e.g. Government bodies, Universities, Enterprises, NSA and wider public, Governing Board, Open workshops, Thematic workshops, Publicity and Awareness creation

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Modernisation of the institutional framework

    Upgrading the mechanisms supporting the RDTI system

    Expanding the sources of and access to funding mechanisms for RDTI

    Creating a national culture of innovation in business and throughout society

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    10

    TERRITORY Cyprus EU Member State

    Innovation Outcomes

    A thorough and critical review of the literature initiated – presently ongoing

    A methodology for monitoring utilising Social Network Analysis has been adopted – now to be empirically tested

    Awareness activities and promotional workshops aimed at private sector investment have been initiated – presently ongoing

    Lessons Learned

    In an era of severe economic constraint, private sector investment is critical for fostering further innovation and growth

    La Réunion Island

    TERRITORY La Réunion France

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 Smart Specialisation French Department Overseas (2012) Sole Outermost Region of Europe in the Indian Ocean (up to 2014)

    Profile Area: 2505 km2

    GDP: 18,000 € Growth rate: 4.5% Energy: 33.5% renewable R&D: 1 university, 40 research units

    Population: 839,500 35% above 20 years old Unemployment: 29% (2010) Education: Poverty Rate: 49% (2008) Key sectors: Trade and Non-trade services

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Wide definition of innovation, resting on 3 pillars: Human, Economic and Territorial Competitiveness and 8 strategic orientations: Human I. Raise level of qualifications to correspond with economic realities, especially Strategic

    Business areas II. Build innovative tools to combat illiteracy Economic III. Optimize local resources to support and encourage networking IV. Put companies in a position to innovate V. Create conditions for implementing downstreaming projects Territorial VI. Implement integrated approach to planning

    VII. Provide greater visibility for innovation VIII. Establishing a consistent and ongoing culture of innovation

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Bonus from public funding awarded to SMEs for innovation projects

    An open service for monitoring Calls and helping stakeholders respond to Calls

    Strengthen Governance: Strategic Committee (State, Regional & Departmental representatives) – Regional Committee for Innovation (11 public and private sector entities + 4 VIPs) – Operators Committee (28 organisations with links to projects and businesses)

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Development of Clusters in sectors with future growth potential:

    Biotechnology (e.g. Biofuel) and Life Sciences

    Energy (e.g. Ocean thermal energy conversion)

    Fishing and Aquaculture (e.g. Marine innovation platform)

    ICT (e.g. Environmental Monitoring Satellite-aided Station)

    Tourism (Pole of excellence)

    Environment

    Innovation Outcomes

    Establishing Réunion as a centre for testing and adapting European technologies and products and proposing solutions on topics that are of main interest for the intertropical markets

    Improvement of the whole innovation chain

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    11

    TERRITORY La Réunion France

    Lessons Learned

    Developing and pursuing innovation strategy is a bottom-up process

    Good governances provides the framework that allows both bottom-up and top-down initiatives to function

    Given a strong boost and a positive signal Business-oriented clusters will develop

    Inter-regional/neighbourhood cooperation benefits all parties

    Social innovation is a critical consideration when planning strategies for innovation and change

    Sicily

    TERRITORY Sicily Region of Italy

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept Giuseppe Polizzano, Evaluation Unit Ministry for Economic Development

    Profile

    Area: 25,706km2

    GDP: 71% of EU27 average (2011) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: “moderate innovator” (RISB 2012)

    Population: approx. 5 million Unemployment: 14.4% (2011) Youth Unemployment 42.8% Education: Poverty Rate: 41.3% Key employment sectors: Services 50%

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Strategy development is focused on regional clusters covering agri-food, smart manufacturing and life sciences

    Coordinating regional with national cluster policies (project of the MoED)

    Strategic Vision embraces Social Innovation, Knowledge interfaces, Funding for innovation

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Start from existing assets relating to specificities of Sicily

    Focus on ST areas where the region is already showing good results

    Build on areas and applications with the potential for having the most widespread impact

    Strengthen interaction between policy and funding sources

    Strengthen the involvement of new stakeholders and partners in implementation

    Develop pilot projects in the field of social innovation linked to the role of ICT

    Better and more effective alignment of support and instruments with beneficiaries’ needs

    Innovative financial tools (seed capital, VC) and PPF to support early stage innovation

    Innovation Outcomes

    Further analysis of distinctive competences in terms of research capacities and human resources and embedded potential of endogenous assets

    Further discussions and development action with productive sectors

    Scenario analysis

    Final identification, definition and setting of the regional priorities for smart specialisation

    Lessons Learned

    High public funding for R&D and human resource but low output in terms of patents, spin-offs etc.

    Regional research lacks governance, connectivity and integration

    Regional innovation strategy lacking in focus and definition

    Procedures and response times not in line with firms’ needs

    Some effective support for SMEs has been achieved in spite of their low propensity to innovation and lack of patenting in hi-tech sectors

    Potentiality of innovation comprised through weak regional strategy, insufficient funding or capital, broken system of governance.

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    12

    EU Mainland Territorial Regional Economies

    Algarve

    TERRITORY Algarve Region of Portugal

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept S3 Platform) Regional Coordination and Development Commission (CCDR) (2013)

    Profile

    Area:

    GDP: 7.78 billion € PC 17,774 € Growth rate: 1.9% Energy: R&D: 0.45% of GDP 1 public university

    Population: 451,006 Unemployment: 17.9% (Youth 40.3%) Education: Higher education 17.3% of pop Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Tourism and related services (66.67%) Construction, Aquaculture, Food and Cork

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Main Socio-Economic RIS3 Objectives (stakeholder needs and societal challenges)

    Reduce dependence of tourism on season factors

    Develop ‘niches of excellence’ in areas that benefit from ‘related variety’ with tourism

    Exploit the potential of maritime cluster in Algarve

    Diversify the economic base of the region creating added value and job RIS3 Priorities – Key criteria for definition of priority areas

    The existence of key assets and capabilities

    Their potential for regional diversification

    The potential has and realistically can achieve critical mass RIS3 Priorities

    Consolidated Sectors – Tourism and Sea Economic significance, capacity to create and sustain jobs and have solid R&D basis

    Emerging Sectors – Ago-feed, ICT, Creative, Renewable Energy, Health and Life Sciences Sectors displaying potential at regional level to have the capacity to drive a Smart Specialisation Strategy, but which also display systemic weaknesses that are hindering economic development.

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    The strategy and its implementation is intended to integrate and exploit the synergies between different policies and funding sources

    Relevant stakeholders and partners are involved in the implementation stage OF RIS3

    RIS3 will stimulate private RDI investment as well as being designed to benefit from the DUI mode because of the relevance of the tourism sector

    CCDR is the responsible body for RIS3 implementation.

    Lessons Learned

    Next Steps

    The linkage of Tourism to other priority areas will help to get smart specialisation up and running

    The creation of adequate policy mix and governance tools to facilitate the implementation process is critical

    Algarve needs support in defining adequate monitoring schemes and control mechanisms to underpin the governance of the programme

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    13

    Alsace

    TERRITORY Alsace Region of France

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) Directorate of Innovation, Research and Higher Education Operational Committee of Innovation of the Regional Council of Alsace (2012)

    Profile

    Area: 8,280 km2 GDP: 52,076 M€ PC 27,986 € (2010) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 2 universities, 3 research centres, 6 regional centres for I&TT.

    Population: Unemployment: Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Trade Transport & Services (44.3%) Education Health & Public Admin (29.5%) Industry (18.2%), Construction (6.5%) Exports PC 15,800 € (2011)

    Clusters

    5 Competitiveness Clusters

    Pharma, Biotech, Medical Instruments

    Focus on Vehicle and Mobility solutions of the future. Cross-border cluster cooperation

    Fibres: Wood, Paper, Textiles, Composites. Cross-border cluster cooperation

    Development of Energy-plus solutions in the construction sector

    Continental Water issues: Pollution management, Quality of water systems, water protection. Cross- border cluster cooperation

    6 Regional Clusters

    116 food processors and producers

    Vine health and wine quality, agronomy and environment. Dedicated collaboration between researchers, agricultural organisations and services companies

    100 ICT companies developing and marketing digital technologies and solutions

    40 companies representing industrial textiles, textile schools, laboratories & research centres

    Eco-companies and Alsatian research specialised in environment issues

    Domestic furnishing and equipment and the design of future furnishing solutions

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    4 levers for strategic action Addressing culture of innovation and creativity within SMEs Developing the skill and capability of firms to innovate Promoting a collaborative approach and academic research partnerships Promoting the region and its innovation-friendly business infrastructure

    3 Regional Convergences Green economy Health and Wellness Humanities and social issues

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Key Challenges for Action

    Foster the development of SMEs

    Strengthen the industrial innovation footprint

    Facilitate commercialisation of innovation

    Foster R&D, business and emerging market cooperation

    Foster culture of innovation and creativity Methodology Main Steps

    Diagnostic e.g. SWOT, Issues and strategic orientations

    S3 Definition e.g. diagnostic elaboration, identification of main actors, establishment of working groups based on the 3 convergences

    S3 Elaboration e.g. KPIs and evaluation

    Innovation Advisory Committee consultation

    Validation of RIS3 plan by Steering Committee / relevant authorising body

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    14

    TERRITORY Alsace Region of France

    Innovation Outcomes

    Cross-border situation of Alsace defined and cooperation focused on mutually productive areas

    Favourable institutional environment established and consolidated i.e. strong governance for innovation and a national/regional cluster policy implemented

    1 Bio€ (over 10 years) earmarked for Alsace in recognition of its excellence in research

    Lessons Learned

    State-region participation based on common diagnostic, and a participatory approach built on stakeholder working groups will support a good connection between entrepreneurial dynamics and strategic orientations

    Aragόn

    TERRITORY Aragόn Region of Spain

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) DG Research & Innovation, directorate of Ministry of Industry & Innovation (2012)

    Profile

    Area: 47,720 km2 (9.5% of Spain) 95% consists of “fragile” rural zones Growth rate: 1.5% GDP (2012) Energy: R&D: University system, Research Insts, International STI, I&T centres, Science Parks and Technological Poles. Budget for Innovation 35 M€ until 2017 but low research absorption

    Population: 1,346,293 (2.85% of Spain). 50%+ live in Zaragoza metropolitan area Unemployment: 21.86% (2013) Education: Tertiary in 25-64 age group = >120% of EU average Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (61%), Agriculture (17%), Construction (13%), Energy (5%). SMEs

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    15

    TERRITORY The Basque Country

    Energy: R&D: expenditure 2.12% GDP (2012) Well-established regional STI network 4 universities, 4 technology parks 210 patents filed (2012) RIS3 focus on Biotech, Nanotech, Alternative Energy

    Key sectors: Services (62%), Industry (21.3%) Construction 6.5%, Ag & Fisheries (0.8%) 11 consolidated clusters and 9 pre-clusters Service sector growing in importance

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    The Vision is to develop the actions required to position the Basque Country among the most advanced and competitive regions in Europe

    Target markets

    Ageing society

    Digital world

    Transport and mobility

    Energy (renewable) Science industry

    Cross-technology Domains

    Biosciences

    Nanoscience

    Advanced manufacturing

    Boosting Competitiveness through Diversity

    Build a society embedded in the global economy connected with the R&D system and international companies

    Increase competitiveness through fostering Knowledge, Creativity and Cooperation

    Ensure a sustainable future in economic, social and environmental terms through the development of new activities and markets

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Identifying priorities

    Analysis of sectoral possibilities and needs

    Analysis of regional assets and RDTI capacities

    Define priority focus areas (see above)

    Regional vision-building through dialogue with government, entrepreneurial, scientific and business actors

    Methodology and Selection criteria

    Build on the established platform of a long tradition in strategic planning of regional industrial and RDTI policy

    Organise a programme of focus groups, interviews, feed-back and comments on proposals

    Prospective analysis of the overall RDTI capacity and overall trends in global society and economy

    Coordination between Regional Ministries (inter-departmental) and provincial and local authorities (multi-level) and between public and private agents (consensus)

    Generate and cultivate an Entrepreneurial Process of Discovery

    Innovation Outcomes

    Global partnerships in RDTI and commercialisation of innovative products established

    International business activities and the international capability of SMEs strengthened

    R&D cooperating networking activities (intercluster cooperation) taking place

    Universities participating in strategic partnerships and cooperating with business

    Effective outreach to involve/include smaller and/or non-innovative companies

    Lessons Learned

    Important to find the balance between demanding active participation and not “disturbing” the actors with unfruitful events and actions

    On an on-going basis, international benchmarking and comparison with key indicators is an important issue

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    16

    Bratislava

    TERRITORY Bratislava Self-Governing Region (BSK) Region of Slovakia

    Data Source & Date

    RIS 3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) BSK jointly with Ministry of Education & Science (MinEdu) (2012)

    Profile

    Area: 2,053 km2 GDP: 46,648 € pc Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 3 universities 53% nation R&D staff / 62% of FP7 1.2% GDP Main research activities: Engineering, Natura; Sciences, Humanities (2012) EU-ISB ranked 22/27 FP7 Participation ranked 22/27 No prior national innovation strategy

    Population: 625,300 (2014) Unemployment: 14% (Young People 32%) Education: Tertiary – High % of population Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Automotive industry (VW etc) Knowledge-intensive services Trade and services, banking and insurance

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Strategic Vision: Creating of an R&D region of European significance

    Achievement of clear leadership in implementation process

    Ensure secure financial arrangements

    Secure central government support

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Roadmap and concrete action plans under development

    Sources of funding are uncertain and State budget services are limited

    Industry stakeholder involvement must be strengthened

    Lessons Learned

    Awareness is not yet sufficient but it is improving. The Ministry of Finance and the business community must be made better aware of the R&D initiatives and opportunities

    Castilla y Leόn

    TERRITORY Castilla y Leόn Region of Spain

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Commissioner for Science &Technology and Innovation Policy + Triple Helix Partnership (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 94,22m km2 GDP: 53.5 billion € PC 21,879 € (2012) Growth rate: Energy: R&D: GERD as % GDP – 1% 4 public and 4 private universities 5 research institutes and 10 units 2 national research centres HAMHIT companies (1.4% of all) account for 65% of business RDI expenditure

    Population: 2, 519,875 (2013) Unemployment: 21.2% (2014) Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (69.6%), Industry (15.5%), Construction (8.3%), Agriculture (6.6%) 13 clusters of which 6 account for 59% of regional economy (Automotive, Components & Equipment, Agro-food, Health, Energy & Environment, Tourism)

    Clusters Four main priorities in support of emerging clusters:

    Strategic: clusters which are needed for sustaining employment and economic wealth

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    17

    TERRITORY Castilla y Leόn Region of Spain Emerging: clusters benefitting from global trends in fields where CyL has competitive

    advantage

    Complementary: clusters needed to improve the competitiveness of the above

    Traditional: clusters with historic relevance for employment and the economy of CyL

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Strategic Vision for the future of Castilla y Leόn and Main Objectives of RIS3: To achieve a competitive position in a global context to contribute to the Region’s goals Employment and sustainable economic growth

    Social and territorial cohesion

    Improved quality of life

    Build evidence base for RIS3. Analysis and Diagnosis of Regional Context and Innovation Potential

    Sectoral analysis: Automotive, Agro-business, Health and Quality of Life, Environment and Energy, Habitat, Tourism and Heritage

    Interviews with: Public Administration, Companies, Researchers, Technology Centre, Knowledge Transfer entities

    Focus Groups: Universities, Knowledge Transfer entities, Companies

    KET Workshops: Advanced Materials, Bio-Technology, Advanced Processes, ITC

    SWOT analyses: (1) RDI agenda (2) Knowledge Digital Society (KDS) agenda,

    Look beyond regional boundaries

    Review of external context e.g. potential for regional collaboration in macro-economic activity; Internationalisation of RDI system

    Look at entrepreneurial dynamics

    Process of Discovery e.g. continuous dialogue with regional actors to explore and identify Specialisation Patterns, Horizontal Priorities (strategic and specific objectives), Vertical Priorities (technology trends, scientific areas, economic sectors)

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Action Plans to be developed by each Ministry

    Budget to be specified but will comprise: Regional Budget appropriations, Funds obtained from Competitive Calls (national and EU), Private sector RDI investments

    Lessons Learned

    Next Steps

    Validation of the selected vertical priorities Establish monitoring and evaluation system Elaboration and agreement of budget Complete final version of strategy Formal approval by regional government Official public presentation of RIS3

    Centre-France

    TERRITORY Centre-France Region of France

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Regional Innovation Agency, Regional Government Centre-France (2012)

    Profile

    Area:

    GDP: 65.2 billion € Growth rate: 0.4% Energy:

    R&D: RIS ranking: EU 85th, France 8/22 Université de Lyon is at the apex of 11 higher education institutions

    Population: 2,530,000 (ageing population) Unemployment: 6.3% Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Economy driven by agriculture and industry Major cereal producing region Cosmetics / Pharma and Rubber

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    18

    TERRITORY Centre-France Region of France

    Region is location of 2nd scientific cluster in France plus 10 others The SATI organisation facilitates spin-offs from scientific research

    Graphic Arts, Computer and Electronics, Mechatronics Automotive industry and Defence Industry

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Key Challenges

    The region lacks a sense of identity

    Diversified economy without strong leadership.

    Public sector University/Research – Private sector cooperation is weak

    Too many subcontractors classified as low-tech

    Maybe too many clusters Main opportunities for future regional development

    RIS3 to be the baseline and the platform for selecting / developing areas of specialisation

    Tourism and Agriculture, linking with ICT, Water management, Heritage and Agro-industry

    Willingness of region to support projects related to innovation

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    SWOT at all stages

    Thematic workshops (x 20 entrepreneurs per event) to raise RIS3 awareness and increase private sector engagement

    Promotion of the RIS3 4C criteria: Targeted Choice, Cooperation, Critical Mass, Competitive Advantage

    Dedicated workshop to investigate other potential smart specialisation areas and flexibility mechanisms, with focus on ecosystem support and funding

    Implementations structured on roadmaps with concrete action plans for each of the selected potential specialisation areas

    Innovation Outcomes

    Regional identity formulated, described and promoted throughout society

    Regional assets for innovation identified, classified and measured

    The regional innovation ecosystem defined and validated

    Areas for smart specialisation identified, established and prioritised

    Croatia

    TERRITORY Croatia National Strategy

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Directorate for Competitiveness & Investment of the Ministry of Economy (2014)

    Profile

    Area: 56,542 km2 GDP: 53.4 billion € PC 12,457 € Growth rate: 0.5% Energy: 12 clusters R&D: 0.75% of GDP 7 public universities, 3 private universities, 4 research institutions, 12 clusters, % firms actively innovating 45% = but both BERD & GERD are well below EU average (c.33% of R&D as % of GDP)

    Population: 4,284,889 Unemployment: 17% (Youth 40%) Education: Upper Secondary & Tertiary 25-64 age group 82.9% Poverty Rate: 18% Key sectors: Telecommunication equipment, Medical equipment, Pharmaceuticals, Environ-mental technologies, Renewable Energy, IT equipment and services, Transportation, Tourism, Fisheries / Aquaculture

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Priority Thematic Areas

    Health

    Sustainable Energy and Environment

    Engineering

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    19

    TERRITORY Croatia National Strategy Bio-Technology and Bio-Economy

    Cross-cutting Themes

    KETs:

    Health: Industrial Bio & Nanotech, advanced manufacturing technologies

    Energy & Environment: Advanced materials, Micro & Nano electronics, Photonics, AMT

    Engineering: Advanced materials, Nano technologies, AMT

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy: Industrial Bio-Technology, Nano Technology, AMT

    ICT:

    Health: E-Health, Robotics

    Sustainable Energy & Environment: semi-conductor design, Robotics

    Engineering: Automotive Embedded Systems, Video games, Robotics

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy: Robotics

    Tourism:

    Health: Health Tourism

    Sustainable Energy & Environment: Green Tourism

    Engineering: ICT/Tourism, Transport solution/tourism

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy Gastro and Eno Tourism

    Creative & Cultural Industries (all thematic priorities)

    Product design, branding, new media (marketing innovation), packaging etc

    Green Growth

    Health: not applicable

    Other Priorities: Applicable

    Societal Challenges

    Health: Health, Demographic change, Wellbeing

    Energy & Environment: Secure clean efficient energy, Climate Action, Resource efficiency

    Engineering: Smart green integrated Transport, Secure societies, protecting freedom

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy: Food security, Sustainable Agriculture, Forestry, Marine, Maritime and Inland water research

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Actions to enable change

    Health – modernisation based on industrial and R&D capabilities

    Health – diversification based on additional activities e.g. Medicare to elderly and disabled

    Energy & Environment – modernisation and diversification of traditional products based on industrial and R&D capabilities

    Energy & Environment – transition to sustainable and advanced engineering

    Engineering – modernisation and diversification of traditional products based on industrial and R&D capabilities

    Engineering – transition to sustainable and advanced engineering

    Engineering – radical foundation of new domain of transport solution

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy – modernisation and diversification of agro-food based on industrial and R&D capabilities

    Bio-Technology/Bio-Economy – transition to sustainable chemistry

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Next Steps

    Drafting of Governance and Monitoring Chapters and finalisation of RIS3 strategy

    Public consultation

    Presentation to European Commission

    Definition and implementation of S3 tools in dialogue with stakeholders of the R&I system, companies and Local and Regional Governments

    Lessons Learned

    Stakeholders must feel engaged in the decision-making process otherwise consultations, workshops etc will have no added value

    Weak innovation infrastructure is deterrent to business sector cooperation

    Top-down approach creates barriers to effective implementation

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    20

    East Sweden

    TERRITORY East Sweden Region of Sweden

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 10,562 km2 GDP: € Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 1 university, 4 key research institutes and technology transfer, green technology cluster, science centre and 2 science parks, printed electronics arena, open innovation platforms, living labs/testbed initiatives

    Population: 430,000 Unemployment: Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors:

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    RIS3 OBJECTIVE: Sustainable Regional Growth 4 Strategic Pillars: Business Development, Innovation, Investment Promotion, Talent Attraction Management

    Thematic Specialisation Areas

    Logistics of Goods and Services: logistical processes including goods, people, material

    Smart and secure Connected Products and Systems: systems of secure, internet-integrated communicating electronics and sensors. Innovative manufacturing and distribution methods e.g. printed electronics

    Simulation and Visualisation: visualisation of complex data processes and interactions through virtual models

    New Industrial Materials: novel materials, Graphene, Nano-engineered surface coatings for metals and plastics

    Cross-cutting Specialisation Area

    Sustainable and resource-efficient Business Development: green product development and business models, circular systems e.g. Waste Disposal, Energy

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Thematic focus groups of 5 – 10 members for each SS area. Participation emphasis on industry, complemented by academia and intermediaries. 3 – 4 workshops per group. Output – strategy and action plan as well as proposals for policy instruments

    KPIs include: Increases in No of Enterprises, No of New Enterprises, Employment, Value Added and No of investments

    Lessons Learned

    Private commitment and contribution is crucial to success. Private involvement is needed to create sufficient impact on projects

    Focus groups in general work well, but allowances have to be made for differences in the level of progress, depending on the theme.

    Research-based knowledge can be very strong relevant to innovation and it is important to maximise its utilisation

    Technology development initiatives generally need more time than originally estimated which can cause problems from a regional policy point of view

    Estonia

    TERRITORY Estonia National Strategy

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform)

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    21

    TERRITORY Estonia National Strategy

    Ministry of Economic Affairs & Communications, and Ministry of Education & Research lead on RIS3. Estonian Development Fund acts as Secretariat (2014)

    Profile

    Area:

    GDP: 19.5 billion € PC 14,860 € (2014) Growth rate: 2.1% Energy: R&D: 3 universities, 2.4% of GDP

    Population: 1,320,000 Unemployment: 7.4% Education: Tertiary, age group 30-34 39.2% Poverty Rate: 17.5% (2010) Key sectors: Manufacturing (16%), Services (12.7%), Construction (7.1%), ICT (5%), Agriculture (3.7%), Energy (3.5%)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    3 National Priority Areas in terms of research, innovation and development ICT

    Create more of our own products i.e. scalable businesses with high added value Position Estonia as a Testbed Platform

    Healthcare Full potential for E-Health not yet reached. Position Estonia as a Testbed Platform for international solutions Synchronise information system of large hospitals Increase the engagement and involvement of the private sector Export E-Health services – promote healthcare tourism Boost funding for Biotechnology research and product development

    Resources Innovative Construction – IT solutions, alternative materials, smart energy solutions Nanotechnology – build on the research of the Nanotechnology Competence Centre Chemical Industry – build on the research of the Oil Shale Competence Centre Health Foods – focus on foods that support health and build on the research of the Bio-Competence Centre of Healthy Dairy Products

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    S3 Budget Both Ministries (MEAC and MEAR) will direct EU funding towards the selected growth areas. But other policy instruments will also indirectly contribute to the growth areas

    Policy Instruments MEAC: Funding for Demand-side policies. Funding for collaboration networks (competence centres and clusters). Funding for start-ups through Start-Up Estonia. MEAR: Funding for Applied Research programme (including growth area specific activities such as the IT Academy). Funding for Speciality Scholarships

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Mechanisms. The goals and indicators for RIS3 are being developed

    Indicators: The three growth areas are very different as economic sectors and have different bottlenecks. Key challenge is to find suitable indicators for each growth area

    Follow-up: The evaluation of the RIS3 goals will be carried out by the Estonian Smart Specialisation Steering Committee on an annual basis

    Lessons Learned

    2014 will be a very important year in terms of RIS3. The managing structure and the detailed measures must be implemented.

    The small size of Estonia has facilitated the integration of the R&D and innovation infrastructure and favoured the collaboration with the business sector in undertaking applied research projects. How can such a dynamic resource be converted into international opportunity?

    Friesland

    TERRITORY Friesland Region of the Netherland (Province of Friesland)

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Government of the Province of Friesland (2012)

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    22

    TERRITORY Friesland Region of the Netherland (Province of Friesland)

    Profile

    Area: 2,960 km2 (8% of total NL) GDP: 17.2 billion € PC 29,100 € Growth rate: 2.0% Energy: R&D: 1.01% GDP No research university but 3 colleges of applied science (includes EU’s most advanced drinking water lab) are networked with living labs and incu-bators form innovation infrastructure Water technology is main research area (within framework of Dutch innovation programme on WT)

    Population: 630,000 55% live in rural areas) Unemployment: 10.9% Education: Higher Ed. 30,000 students Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Health & Welfare (17%) Industry & mineral extraction (15%) Trade & Repairs (14%) Water is a major technology industry e.g. water & gas purification, waste water treatment Sustainable energy Tourism

    Friesland – Living Lab Region. Integral regional development through:

    o Development of a Conscious Society o Using Culture and Creativity o Talent development; and o Societal Digitisation

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    The integral vision is for a region that is operational as a Living Lab for conscious regional development based on efficient use of all natural resources, such as Clean Water, Nutrients, Biomass and Energy but also driven by the Cultural Energy of Human Capital.

    Living Lab programmes are implemented in society according to the following rules

    Create an innovation space and process

    Listen to all stakeholders and find out together what really matters

    Create regional innovation agendas (policy tool)

    Install regional living labs throughout region, not only in one location (scientific tool)

    Apply a clear ownership pyramid (governance tool)

    Apply a reflective “monitoring and evaluation” methodology (feedback tool)

    Consciousness of Culture

    Culture points to and reflects the pattern of human activities and the symbolic structures that make them meaningful

    Conscious individuals take control of their life and personal development. The more conscious, the more self-control.

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Future orientation of S3-RIS3 process

    Implementation

    Regional Living Labs

    Regional Smart Specialisation

    Regional Digital Agenda Friesland

    Hot-spots valorisation programme

    Bio-based society (on a regional scale)

    Flexibility towards emerging challenges created by shared holistic responsibility for all partners’ cooperation

    Monitoring mechanisms benchmarked on EU partnerships and projects together with international knowledge institutes are the basis for evaluation and comparison

    Lessons Learned

    Next Steps

    S3 is implemented on short term by participating in EU Calls together with our Vanguard partner regions with whom there is a joint Smart Specialisation Agreement

    Comparable regional development agendas of EU partner regions will inform the development of a medium-term regional innovation strategy for smart specialisation

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    23

    Languedoc-Roussillon

    TERRITORY Languedoc-Roussillon Region of France

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) L-R Regional Administration for RIS3 (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 27,380km2

    GDP: € pc 75% of EU 27 average Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 3% of GDP. 5 universities, 10 research institutes. Higher % of innovative companies than national and EU rates

    Population: 2.7 million. Highest growth rate in France Unemployment: Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (48%), Trade & Repairs (28%), Construction (14%), Industry (10%), Major wine region, Cultural tourism

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: High research activity to achieve economic transformation (territory adapted to the new economy) 5 stage strategy: Governance – Identification and Mapping – Entrepreneurial Discovery – Prioritisation – Policy mix Process

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Establish Steering Committee – Technical Committee – Regional Innovation Agency = Dedicated Project Team

    10 criteria for innovation actions choices:

    Economic impact on region

    Innovations and commercial applications

    National/ International market target in 5 – 7 years

    Economic transformation of the activity / domain in 5 – 7 years

    Creating a common vision among the partners

    Activity across several sectors

    Change for leadership in Europe in 5 – 7 years

    Need for public funds

    Differentiation

    Pilot or Main Projects

    SWOT analysis to identify pilots

    Pilot to determine role of ICT in regional strategic policy framework for digital growth

    ICT as a means rather than and end i.e. no large ICT companies

    KET to support traditional and emerging sectors

    Source of added value at the crossroads of economic activities

    Latvia

    TERRITORY Latvia National Strategy

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Ministry of Education and Science (2014)

    Profile

    Area: 64,590 km2 GDP: 24.06 billion € (2014) Growth rate: 4.1% Energy: R&D: Private sector investment 25% (2012)

    Population: 2,001,468 Unemployment: 10.9% Education: Highest in 30-34 age group 36% Poverty Rate: Key sectors:

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    24

    TERRITORY Latvia National Strategy

    Scientists and researchers 5593 (2012) Number of patents 11 (2011) % of innovative companies 30% (2010)

    Services (25.3%), Industry (16.4%), Public Administration, Defence, Education, Health (15.1%) (2014) High/Medium Tech % exports 23.8% (2012)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    RIS3 goal is economic transformation towards higher added value, productivity and more effective usage of resources.

    Key Strategic Pillars

    Building innovation and human capacity for solving innovation challenges as the arise

    Analysis of regional assets and innovation potential assessment based on hard data

    Selection of priorities based on analysis, stakeholder consultation and consensus

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Directions

    Structural changes in manufacturing and exporting in tradition economic sectors

    Future growth sectors – products and services with high added value

    Sectors with significant horizontal impact on economic transformation

    Priorities

    Products with high added value

    Productive innovation system

    Energy efficiency

    Advanced ICT

    Advanced education system

    Knowledge base and Human Capital

    Polycentric development

    Specialisation Areas

    Knowledge intensive Bio-economy

    Bio-medicine, Medical technologies, Bio-pharmacy, Bio-technology

    Smart materials, technology and engineering

    Smart Energy

    ICT

    Innovation Outcomes

    Measures of RIS3 Success (Indicators)

    Investment in R&D will be 1.5% of GDP by 2020

    High/Medium Tech exports as % of total: 31% by 2020

    Private Sector investment in R&D will be 48% by 2020

    Number of scientists and researchers will be 7000 by 2020

    People with highest education in 30-34 age group will be 40% by 2020

    Number of patents (EPO) will be 50 by 2020

    % of innovative companies will be 40% by 2020

    Lessons Learned

    Prevalent business model of Latvian companies is not oriented towards innovation but is indiscriminately exploiting cheap labour and natural resources

    Cooperation between industry and science is weak

    The current education system does not match the demand and supply of labour in STEM sector

    Lower Austria

    TERRITORY Lower Austria Region of Austria

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) Department for Economy, Tourism & Technology, Government of Lower Austria (2014)

    Profile Area: 19,178 km2 Population: 1,618,000 (2013)

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    25

    TERRITORY Lower Austria Region of Austria

    GDP: 49.6 billion € Growth rate: 0.4% (2012) Energy: R&D: 1.53% of GDP (759 M€) (2012) 4 Innovation & Technology Centres 5 innovation-related Cluster initiatives Regionally diffused Innovation culture

    Unemployment: 7.1% Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors:

    Clusters

    Smart Specialisation through Clusters

    Green Building Cluster: energy efficient construction, healthy interior environments

    Food Cluster: food safety, regional and bio-products

    Plastics Cluster: bio-plastics

    Mechatronics Cluster: energy efficiency in production processes

    Logistics Cluster: model split, bundling (empty runs)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: Establish LA as a benchmark for EU “Top” Innovation Regions

    Create a unique selling proposition (USP), no duplication of other regions

    Collaborate with neighbour regions

    Create critical mass in R&D and Innovation in niche technologies

    Facilitate innovation in rural areas and foster innovation capacity

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    For Technology & Innovation Partnerships

    Local contact point with proactive approach to mobilising innovation potential regardless of sector

    Coaching of Firms and R&D projects

    Technology screening, patenting and licencing support

    Award for innovation, matching needs of enterprises For Clusters

    Contacts between business and academia

    Trend scouting

    Competence mapping

    Focussed topics

    Linked activities

    Regional value added

    Specialisation

    Measured in BSC For Technopols (Innovation & Technology Centres)

    Strengthen regional assets and develop regional potential

    Create critical mass in a selective way on specific spots

    Involvement of all relevant regional actors and stakeholders (Triple Helix)

    Innovation Outcomes

    BSC as planning, monitoring and evaluation tool well established and accepted within network

    No strict top-down specifications regarding priorities

    Overall strategy as basic framework. No priorities included, priority development on programme level, continuous reviews and adaption through BSC monitoring

    Lessons Learned

    What worked

    Good cooperation between programmes

    One BSC review for all clusters

    Process of bottom-up development

    Accepted as the one official strategy (budget allocations linked to this)

    Both Minister and operation level kept well informed

    What did not work

    At the beginning, cooperation between programmes

    At the beginning, a lot of scepticism

    Time frame, took very long to introduce it

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    26

    TERRITORY Lower Austria Region of Austria Monitoring through BSC provides

    sound basis for making changes

    Lubelskie

    TERRITORY Lubelskie Voivodeship Region of Poland

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) (2013) Department of Economy and Innovation, Marshal Office of Lubelskie Voivodeship

    Profile

    Area: 25,160 km2 GDP: 13.5 billion € PC 10,300 € Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 5 Universities, 10 research institutes, 3 science & technology parks

    Population: 2,180,000 Unemployment: 14.4% Education: 18 tertiary education institutes Poverty Rate: 31.3% Key sectors: Bio-economy, Health and Wellness, IT, Control Engineering, Low carbon Emission

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: Lubelskie as a cooperative region specialising in modern business within bio-med-info and low carbon emission energy sectors

    Main Objective and Priorities

    General Objective: Development of chosen sectors (as per Key sectors)

    Priority 1: Increase ability of business entities to create or absorb and to implement innovations in the areas of smart regional specialisation

    Priority 2: Increase ability of B+R entities to create and commercialise knowledge in the areas of smart regional specialisation

    Priority 3: Strengthen the innovation environment, working towards the development of areas of smart regional specialisation

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Choice of specialisation is based on shared resources. Close inter-sectoral cooperation between entities operating in the identified fields of economy and science is an essential

    Diagnosis comprised studies on the position and competitiveness of the region in Poland and Europe, using data from sources such as

    Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2009 and 2012

    OECD and World Bank

    PARP the Polish Agency for Enterprise Development

    GUS Central Statistical; Office in Poland

    Own analyses

    Pilot or Main Projects

    Planned Pilot Projects

    Smart Incubation: Inter-collegiate program of incubation and development of innovative companies

    Smart Services: Pro-innovative system to meet innovative needs of enterprises

    Smart Researchers: Intercollegiate program to support young researchers conducting commercial research in areas of smart specialisation

    Smart Research Areas: Development and promotion of a regional inter-disciplinary research program in the areas of bio-md-info for smart specialisation

    Lessons Learned

    The Quadruple Helix approach fits well with RIS3 implementation

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    27

    Marche

    TERRITORY Marche Region of Italy

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) Marche Regional Council (2012)

    Profile

    Area: 9,694 km2 GDP: 26,166 € pc (2007) Growth rate: 18.2% (2008) Energy: R&D: 4 universities, 3 technology research centres, 1 science and technology park (KET focus)

    Population: 1,569,578 Unemployment: 6.4% Education: Tertiary 25-64 age group 15.2% Poverty Rate: Key sectors: SMEs

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    28

    TERRITORY Mazovia Region of Poland

    Office of the Marshal of the Mazowieckie Voivodship in Warsaw; Mazovia Innovation Council (Advisory Board); Management Board of MV and the Regional Council (Management Board) (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 35,558 km2 (11.4% of Poland GDP: 14,275 € pc Growth rate: Energy: R&D: Universities 19 public, 91 private 45 clusters (mostly early stage)

    Population: 528,600 (13.7% of Poland) Unemployment: 10.7% Education: Secondary & Tertiary 44% of pop Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Industry, Agriculture, Construction, Services

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Main Goal:Increased innovation potential, leading to accelerated growth and increased competitiveness of Mazovia

    Strategic Goal 1: Increased and strengthened cooperation in innovation and innovativeness development

    Strategic Goal 2: increased internationalisation aiming at innovativeness of region

    Strategic Goal 3: increased efficiency of support and financial support to pro-innovative initiatives in the region

    Strategic Goal 4: shaping and promoting pro-innovative and pro-entrepreneurial attitudes fostering cooperation and creativity

    Strategic Goal 5: strengthening of the Information Society as the key driver of innovation

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Adopting Smart Specialisation

    Evidence base for RIS3 compiled from a set of 4 SWOT analyses: Academic Potential, Economic Potential, Social Potential and the General characteristics of the region in relation to the promotion of innovation

    Identification Process (1) Feedback (analyses, reports, statistical data), desk research (2) Diagnosis – initial selection of leading sectors (3) First round of consultation meetings (4) Modification of the list of leading economic sectors. Feedback (5) Feedback analysis (6) Narrow down list. Identify cross-sectoral connections. Link with KETs and support

    processes (7) Established of priority economic areas – hubs representing SS areas of the region (8) Second round of consultation meetings. One-to-one and Open meetings (9) Feedback analysis. Further specification of smart specialisation areas

    Innovation Outcomes

    Provisional identification of smart specialisation areas

    Safe Food

    Intelligent Management Systems

    Modern Services for Business

    High Quality of Life

    Lessons Learned

    Be Prepared for Problems likely to be encountered

    Centre- Periphery conflict

    How to specialise without one easily identifiable leading area/sector

    How to involve stakeholders in the process, especially SMEs

    How to address low levels of social capital and trust

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    29

    Moravia-Silesia

    TERRITORY Moravia-Silesia Region of the Czech Republic

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Elaboration on basis of Regional Innovation Strategy 2010-2020 and CR National RIS3 Regional Development Agency 2013

    Profile

    Area: 256,653km2 (2014) GDP: € pc 71% of EU 28 Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 5 universities

    Population: 1,221,832 (2013) Unemployment: 10.3% (2014) Education: 9.977 graduates in 2014 (25%) Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Services (58%), Industry (40%), Agriculture (2%)

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: M-S will be a progressive innovative region utilising existing know-how for tackling new challenges. By 2020 will belong to 25 most innovative regions of EU.

    Global Objective: Improve regional economic competitiveness in global markets

    Horizontal Priorities: Technology Transfer, Human Resources, Internationalisation, Coordination and implementation on strategy.

    Vertical Priorities: Engineering, Metallurgy, Energy, Automotive, Biotechnology, IT and digital engineering

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    2 years action plans

    Specific development projects

    Tools designed to implement RIS3 strategy e.g. innovation vouchers, brokerage events, support for clusters, innovation management training, technology foresight etc

    Identified sources of finance e.g. regional and national budget, structural funds, other EU innovation-related instruments (Horizon 2020, Eureka, COSME)

    Pilot or Main Projects

    To be identified

    Innovation Outcomes

    Universities and companies actively participating and cooperating

    Spin-offs / new start-ups at the rate of 2 RIS3 companies per year

    Nordland

    TERRITORY Nordland Region of Norway

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Strategic Concept (S3 Platform) Director Economic Development Nordland County Council (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 36,090 km2 (11.8% of Norway) Located north of the Arctic Circle GDP: € Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 1 university, 2 university colleges, business parks and incubators RIS3 development involved 600+ stakeholders

    Population: 240,000 (4.75% of total) Unemployment: Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Largest producer of Atlantic salmon and trout; Second largest producer of hydro-electric power; Non-renewable resources include Oil, Gas, Minerals and Metals. SME

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    30

    TERRITORY Nordland Region of Norway

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision – Sustainable Growth through Innovation Main objectives and strategy of RIS3

    Build a more sustainable and competitive regional innovation system and improve R&D capacity based on the needs of the business community

    Enhance the cooperation between R&D institutions and companies

    Focus on Cluster development in 3 industries – Process, Marine and Experienced-based Tourism.

    Develop a strategic policy framework specifically for digital growth in the region but prioritising access to Broadband for all households.

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Action Plans on 3 levels

    Structural level concerning the development of measures to build the regional innovation system and regional R&D capacity

    Industrial sector level on development of various initiatives within companies

    Educational level for development of educational capacity at upper secondary grades in cooperation with industry

    Derived methodology of RIS3 objectives

    Develop strategic tool to target and prioritise efforts within regional development and innovation

    Build a Dialogue Arena for key Triple Helix stakeholders resulting in a continuous and learning and discovery process

    Participate in and/or promote an international network of highly qualified actors who will act as objective observers of the region and provide input on our innovation strategy

    Piedmont

    TERRITORY Piedmont Region of Italy

    Data Source & Date

    RS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform) Research and Innovation Directorate of Piedmont Regional Government (2013)

    Profile

    Area: 25,319 km2 GDP: 126.8 billion € Growth rate: Energy: R&D: 1.82% GDP expenditure Consolidated research and innovation system comprising 4 universities, 6 science & technology parks, 12 innovation clusters, technological ICT District. Patents registered: 137/mn population

    Population: 4,440,000 Unemployment: Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors:

    Clusters 12 Innovation Clusters Agro-food

    Biotechnology and a Biomedical Engineering

    Sustainable Chemistry

    New Materials

    Digital Creativity and Multimedia

    Sustainable Architecture and Hydrogen

    Renewable Energy and Biofuels

    Fittings, systems and Components for Renewable Energies

    Renewable Energies and Micro-Hydro

  • Compendium of EU Innovation Good Practice

    31

    TERRITORY Piedmont Region of Italy ICT

    Mechatronics and Advanced Production Systems

    Textiles

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    Vision: To make Tradition an innovative asset for the region Digital Growth Priorities (explicitly designed within RIS3)

    RIS3 will include specific chapter devoted to digital growth strategy for the region

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Digital Agenda (DA) defined through a consultation process (periodical consultations)

    DA is conceived as a Living Strategy (and document) for 2014-2020

    DA Launch campaign – collect and analyse citizens’ feedback via social media

    SWOT to assess what is needed to reinforce ICT capacity building

    Indicators and sources defined to measure progress of interventions in the fields of digital literacy, e-participation, broadband, as well as online efficiency of public administration

    Lessons Learned

    Already in place – mapping of areas specialisation and coordination at national level

    Intention to reinforce the learning/peer review dimension with other regions

    Support is still needed in areas of weakness:

    Entrepreneurial dynamics

    International economic positioning (internationalisation

    Monitoring and evaluation system

    Level of awareness is generally good and is supported by the national Ministry, the Regional administration units and by the business and academic communities

    Pomorskie

    TERRITORY Pomorskie Voivodeship Region of Poland

    Data Source & Date

    RIS3 2014-2020 Smart Specialisation Concept (S3 Platform

    Profile

    Area: 18,300 km2 (5.9% of Poland) GDP: 19.49 billion € (2012) PC 7900 € Growth rate: 1.9% (2012) Energy: R&D: 0.61% of GDP Universities – 9 Public, 19 Private 23 R&D institutions, 4 STI parks, 19 clusters, 12 business incubators. Innovative firms – 4.8% of all firms

    Population: 2,230,000 (5.9% Poland) Unemployment: 12.5% Education: Poverty Rate: Key sectors: Those with greatest growth potential – ICT, Logistics, Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, Energy, Bio-technology, Baltic Ports and Maritime, Creative industry, Automotive

    Innovation Aims / Strategy

    The aim is Smart Diversification rather than smart specialisation

    Support for sectors with greatest potential for technology/non-technology development

    Focus on innovation, supporting innovative approaches to boost business

    Diffusion of new technology (e.g. Smart grid) and social solutions (e.g. in education(

    Enhancement of digital competence of residents, businesses and institutions

    Innovation Actions / Methodology

    Approach to implementation includes actions/activities that target