Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must...

21
Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams

Transcript of Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must...

Page 1: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Observing Dark Energy

SDSS, DES, WFMOS teamsSDSS, DES, WFMOS teams

Page 2: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Understanding Dark Energy

No compelling theory, must be observational driven

We can make progress on questions:• Is DE just a cosmological constant (w(z)=-

1)? (Make better observations and push to higher z)

• Is DE a new form of matter (with negative effective pressure) or a breakdown of GR?

(Study DE using different probes)

But there are only two broad avenues:• Geometrical tests (SN, BAO) • Growth of structure (ISW)

Page 3: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Massive SurveysNeed large surveys of the Universe to measure DE accurately

SDSS & AS2 ISW SDSS SN Survey (Smith’s talk)

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO)

Dark Energy Survey (DES)The power of photo-z’s (Lahav’s talk)

WFMOS by Gemini/SubaruThe power of spectroscopy

Page 4: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

SDSSwww.sdss.org

DR5: Million spectra, 8000 sq degs

Extension (2005-2008): Legacy, SNe, Galaxy

SDSSwww.sdss.org.uk/dr5

Page 5: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Integrated Sachs-Wolfe EffectDark Energy effects the rate of growth of structure in Universe

• Poisson equation with dark energy:

• In a flat, matter-dominated universe (CMB tells us this), then density fluctuations grow as:

• Therefore, curvature or DE gives a change in the gravitational potential

k 2Φ'= −4πGd

dηa−1(δρm + δρDE )[ ]

δρm ∝ a⇒ dΦ /dη = 0

Page 6: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Experimental Set-up

Nolta et al, Boughn & Crittenden, Myers et al, Afshordi et al, Fosalba Nolta et al, Boughn & Crittenden, Myers et al, Afshordi et al, Fosalba et al., Gaztanaga et al., Rassat et al.et al., Gaztanaga et al., Rassat et al.

Page 7: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

WMAP-SDSS CorrelationNo signal in a flat, matter-dominated Universe

Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs)

WMAP W band

Page 8: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

ISW DetectedUpdate of the Scranton et al. (2003) paper

• 6300 sq degrees• Achromatic • 5 detection

Page 9: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Giannantonio et al. (2006)Cross-correlation of WMAP3 and SDSS quasars

Detection of DE at z>1

0.075<0.075<mm<0.45<0.45-1.15<-1.15<ww<-0.76<-0.76

WMAP3 best fit

Page 10: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Evolution of DE

Consistent with Consistent with w=-1w=-1

Rules out models Rules out models

DD(z=1.5) > 0.5(z=1.5) > 0.5

Page 11: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Modified Gravity

LCDMDGP

Song et al. (2006)

Page 12: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

SDSS SN Survey

N S

Use the SDSS 2.5m telescope• September 1 - November 30 of 2005-2007• Scan 300 square degrees of the sky every 2 days• “Stripe82” (UKIDSS data)• WHT/NTT leading spectroscopic follow-up (Smith talk)

Page 13: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Page 14: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

DES SN Survey

Sullivan et al. (2003)

SN surveys are now systematics limited

Focus on elliptical hosts as less dust and no SNII

DES will survey 9deg2 to z=1 detecting ~300 ellipticals Ia’s in 5 years

Target clusters (boost of a few)

Page 15: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

SDSS DR5 520k galaxies

WMAP3

m=0.24 best

fit WMAP model

Percival et al. 2006Percival et al. 2006

Miller et al. 2001, Percival et al. 2001, Tegmark et al. 2001, Cole et al. 2005, Eisenstein et al. 2005, Hutsei 2006, Blake et al. 2006, Padmanabhan et al. 2006

Page 16: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Cosmological Constraints

Sullivan et al. (2003)

Standard ruler (flat,h=0.73,b=0.17)

Best fit m=0.26

99.74% detection

h=0.72±0.08 HST

m=0.256+0.049-

0.029

mh2 WMAP3

m=0.256+0.019-

0.023

m0.275h WMAP3

m=0.256+0.029-

0.024

Percival et al. (2006)

Page 17: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

WFMOS

• Proposed MOS on Subaru via an international collaboration of Gemini and Japanese astronomers

• 1.5deg FOV with 4500 fibres feeding 10 low-res spectrographs and 1 high-res spectrograph

• ~20000 spectra a night (2dfGRS at z~1 in 10 nights)

• DE science, Galactic archeology, galaxy formation studies and lots of ancillary science from database

Page 18: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

WFMOS Surveys

• Parkinson et al. (2007)

• Emission-line galaxies

• 5600 deg2 at z=1.1 (dz=0.3)

• 150 deg2 at z=3.15 (dz=0.2)

• FoM an order of magnitude larger than SDSS (dw=4%)

• Optimum is broadly peaked and insensitive to other surveys

• Now investigating curvature and other w(z) models (Clarkson et al. 2007)

Optimize instrument Optimize instrument parametersparameters

Page 19: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

After SDSSII

• Measure distance to 1% at z=0.35 and z=0.6

• 10000 deg2 with 1.5m LRGs to z=0.8 (median z= 0.5)

• 100k quasars as well

• Starting 2009

• 7 times more volume

Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS)

2SLAQ

Page 20: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

Conclusions

• ISW has measured density of DE at z>1; looks like a cosmological constant

• SDSS SN Survey will deliver >500 Ia’s this year. SN surveys are now systematics dominated (DES will exploit Ia’s in elliptical galaxies)

• SDSS BAO measures are robust and deliver 10% measurements on cosmological parameters

• WFMOS and AS2 will move BAO to 1% level

• Strong degeneracy with curvature; need many distance scale measures as function of redshift

Page 21: Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:

2057 (April 1st 2007)