Observational needs for global carbon cycle modelling Chris Jones Met Office Hadley CentreESA CCI...
-
Upload
paulina-smith -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Observational needs for global carbon cycle modelling Chris Jones Met Office Hadley CentreESA CCI...
Observational needs for global carbon cycle modelling
Chris Jones
Met Office Hadley Centre ESA CCI CMUG Fourth Integration Meeting, Exeter, June 2014
© Crown copyright Met Office
• Importance of carbon cycle in climate models and projections
• Large Uncertainty
– Better evaluation needed
• Role of EO and ESA-CCI
• Requirements for CMIP6
Introduction
© Crown copyright Met Office
Motivation – why are carbon cycle projections important?• Carbon cycle key new element in CMIP5 modelling
• Makes projections more relevant and useful
• “TCRE” – critical new outcome of AR5• What emissions (reductions) required to achieve given pathway?
• But large uncertainty hinders usefulness
Warming link to cumulative emissionsAR5, WG1, SPM.10
compatible emissions pathways for the RCPs. Fig 6.25; Jones et al., 2013
But what are the key processes and uncertainties?• ANOVA decomposition of spread between models and scenarios
• Scenario differences dominate compatible fossil emissions
After mid-century emissions pathways separate almost completely by scenario
Hewitt et al., 2013 submitted
• ANOVA decomposition of spread between models and scenarios
• Scenario differences dominate compatible fossil emissions
• Similar for ocean uptake, but not for land
Land uncertainty
large in models
through 21st century
Hewitt et al., 2013 submitted
ocean spread largely due to
scenarios
“Low confidence on the magnitude of modelled future land carbon changes”
“very high confidence, ocean carbon uptake of anthropogenic CO2 emissions will continue”
But what are the key processes and uncertainties?
But what are the key processes and uncertainties?• ANOVA decomposition of spread between models and scenarios
• Scenario differences dominate compatible fossil emissions
• Similar for ocean uptake, but not for land
• Caveat – not true regionally for ocean…
Global ocean N. Atlantic
S. ocean
Hewitt et al., 2013 submitted
Missing processes in CMIP5 models?
●Permafrost carbon
●Permafrost thaw “virtually certain” [Ch. 12]
●“low confidence” on the magnitude of carbon losses
●N-cycle: “very likely, …, that nutrient shortage will limit ... future land carbon sinks”
●Wetlands: “ [CH4 emissions] likely to increase... low confidence in magnitude”
●Land-management●fire
Fig 6.36; O'Connor et al., 2013
Evaluation background• Model development has moved towards
greater complexity
• Carbon-cycle, chemistry, more interactive aerosols now common place in CMIP5-class models
• Evaluation not necessarily kept apace
Ocean Atmos
Ice Land
Ecosystems
Chemistry
Aerosol
AOIL well evaluated
ESMless well evaluated
Evaluation• Taken here in its widest sense
• Understanding the system and implementing improvements in the models
• Goes far beyond simple beauty context of comparing datasets side-by-side
• Top-down
• Need to look at whole-system outputs. “get the right answer…”
• Bottom-up
• Process understanding and evaluation. “…for the right reason”
• Emergent constraints
• A posterior constraint on outputs – determining which observations matter
CMIP5 Biogeochemistry Evaluation• Anav et al. (2013, J. Clim) began an
activity to systematically evaluate carbon cycle in CMIP5 models
© Crown copyright Met Office
Anav et al, 2013
Global soil and biomass carbon stores
© Crown copyright Met Office
N. Hemi model spread: factor 4 tropics model
spread: factor 2
Model spread in biomass540 ± 220 PgC
Global soil and biomass carbon stores
Anav et al, 2013
© Crown copyright Met Office
Global soil and biomass carbon stores
Anav et al, 2013
N. Hemi model spread: factor 10
tropics model spread: factor 5
Model spread in soil carbon1510 ± 790 PgC
© Crown copyright Met Office
EO requirements
• Long list– LAI/NDVI
• Phenology, seasonal cycle and trends– Land cover
• Especially for land-use/change– Biomass
• Evaluating/monitoring stock changes, land use emissions– Atmospheric Composition
• CO2, CH4– Soil moisture, fire
• Drivers of terrestrial carbon changes– Ocean colour
• Biological activity, location of nutrients
CCI example: Land-cover• ESA CCI land-cover project and new dataset coming out of this
• Being used to evaluate new PFTs map
• Example of working directly with EO community to influence format/quality of products
courtesy Anna Harper, Andy Hartley
Emergent Constraints
First coined in the context of climate projections by Allen & Ingram (2002) (?)
Emergent Constraint : a relationship between an Earth System sensitivity to anthropogenic forcing and an observable (or already observed) feature of the ES.
Emergent because it emerges from the ensemble of ESMs.
Constraint because it enables an observation to constrain the estimate of the ES sensitivity in the real world.
Fluctuation Dissipation Theorem – so we think we can trust links across timescales from variability to sensitivity...
Archetypal Example of an Emergent Constraint
Hall & Qu (2006)Slide courtesy Peter Cox
Relationship between CO2 Growth-rate and Tropical Temperature - Observations
Slide courtesy Peter Cox
Constrained distribution of tropical land carbon
Prior C4MIPPDF
After IAVConstraint
Slide courtesy Peter Cox
© Crown copyright Met Office
Emergent Constraints:caveats and potential
• Not a silver bullet
– Not intended to replace “traditional” evaluation
• But fine balance of carbon processes leads to high risk that model improvement won't narrow uncertainty...
– c.f. Cloud feedbacks and climate sensitivity
• EMCs provide a complimentary approach
– But Carbon IAV only uses 1 data point!
– Mauna Loa CO2 site
– Spatial information may allow regional constraints
– Also apply to CH4 IAV to assess future sensitivity
© Crown copyright Met Office
Future requirements of ESM Evaluation
• CMIP6
• Idea of satellite “MIP”s around a smaller core
• Each MIP to be responsible for own set of process experiments
• Must all have strong evaluation focus
courtesy Eyring & Stouffer
© Crown copyright Met Office
Requirements and priorities for CMIP6
• CMIP6 will devolve experiment design/evaluation activities back to component communities
• Crude history:– 2000-2009: “carbon cycle is important”– 2009-2014: “included in CMIP models. Large spread”– 2015-2020: “must improve”
• Not just make progress• But be able to demonstrate/quantify progress
© Crown copyright Met Office
C4MIPOCMIP LUMIP
GHGsOceancolour
Biomass
GHGs Landcover
MIP activities
CCI datasets
Future datasets
© Crown copyright Met Office
Conclusions
• Carbon cycle crucial in current / next-generation climate models
– But only if we can make demonstrable progress in evaluation and improvement
– Evaluation need to keep pace with added complexity
• Vision for CMIP6
• Leading role of MIPs in ensuring evaluation focus
• Multiple carbon-related MIP activities
• EO / CCI data will prove invaluable