Psych 156A/ Ling 150: Acquisition of Language II Lecture 7 Grammatical Categories.
Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...
Transcript of Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...
![Page 1: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DISTINGUISHING OBLIGATORY AND NON-OBLIGATORY GRAMMATICAL CATEGORIES
WITH REGARD TO ‘THINKING FOR SPEAKING’
Saartje Ghillebaert & Klaas Willems
1
![Page 2: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LANGUAGE AND COGNITION
• Edward Sapir: “no two languages are ever sufficiently similar to
be considered as representing the same social reality”
• To investigate the influence words have over individuals and groups
• Benjamin Lee Whorf
• The world conveys the basic impressions but language, by creating
specific divisions and foci, helps mould the way speakers view the
world
2
![Page 3: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
THE WHORFIAN HYPOTHESIS
• The strong version claims that language determines thought and
cognition.
• Linguistic determinism
• The weak version claims that linguistic categories of a language
influence a speaker’s thought patterns.
• Linguistic relativity
3
![Page 4: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
‘THINKING FOR SPEAKING ’
• Slobin
• A specific thinking process during the formulation of an
utterance
• The connection between language and thought
• Grammatically encoded categories direct speakers to attend
to certain categories in the ‘thinking for speaking’ process
4
![Page 5: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
‘THINKING FOR SPEAKING ’
Conceptualising an
event for purposes
of communication
Encoded categories
of a languageObserved reality
Mutual, dynamic
relationship
Draws the focus to
certain aspects of the
observed reality
5
![Page 6: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
‘THINKING FOR SPEAKING ’
• Flecken : “conceptualization processes that take place during the
organization and selection of content for expression”
Conceptualization
in speech
production
Encoded
categories of a
languageObserved reality
Draws the focus
to certain aspects
of an event
6
Mutual, dynamic
relationship
![Page 7: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
‘THINKING FOR SPEAKING ’
Slobin’s hypothesis:
• Speakers attend to encoded grammatical categories and not to
non encoded
Grammatical category:
• Progressive aspect
7
![Page 8: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SLOBIN’S EXPERIMENTS
• Collected narrations
• Different native languages
• English, Spanish, German and Hebrew
• Encoding of progressive aspect
8
![Page 9: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PROGRESSIVE ASPECT
• A subcategory of imperfective aspect
• A grammatical category which denotes an action that is dynamic
• an action or event in progress
• English
• Encoded (and obligatory)
• Continuous: to be + present particle
• He is playing.
• Not encoded in German? (according to Slobin)
9
![Page 10: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SLOBIN’S EXPERIMENTS
• English
• “The dog is running (away).”
• German
• “Der Hund läuft (weg).”
‘The dog runs (away).’
Findings confirm his claim:
Categories which are encoded (‘grammaticalized’) are generally
expressed while categories which are not are generally ignored.
102008
![Page 11: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
OBLIGATORY AND OPTIONALCATEGORIES
Encoded grammatical
category
Obligatory Optional
• Both are encoded form-meaning pairings in
a language’s grammar
• Only the obligatory category must be used
in speech in specific contexts.
• The progressive in English is a grammatically
encoded category which is also obligatory
11(Levinson 2000, Belligh & Willems 2021)
![Page 12: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
THE PROGRESSIVE IN DUTCH
• Two main constructions encode progressive aspect:
• the ‘aan het construction’
• ‘Posture / motion verb construction’
12
![Page 13: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
‘POSTURE/MOTION VERBCONSTRUCTION ’
13
• The posture verb cx: posture verb + te + infinitive
• Used with either one of the following verbs: liggen ‘lie’, zitten ‘sit’, staan ‘stand’ or hangen ‘hang’
• The motion verb cx: lopen ‘run’ + te ‘to’ + infinitive
(1) Ze staan te praten.
‘They are talking.’ (Lit: ‘They stand to talk.’)
(2) Ik loop te piekeren.
‘I am worrying.’ (Lit: ‘I run to worry.’)
![Page 14: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
THE ‘AAN HET CONSTRUCTION ’
• A prepositional periphrastic construction
• Often combined with the verb zijn ‘be’
• Consists of the locative preposition aan ‘at’/‘on’, the definite article het
‘the’ combined with an infinitive form of the verb:
(1) De hond is aan het lopen.
‘The dog is running.’ (Lit.: ‘The dog is at the run.’)
14
![Page 15: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
THE PROGRESSIVE IN DUTCH
• Two main progressive constructions
• Both Encode progression/ ‘ongoingness’
• Both are optional
15
![Page 16: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
THE PROGRESSIVE IN DUTCH
DUTCH:
(1) Zij speelt piano.‘She plays/is playing the piano.’ (Lit.: ‘She play-PRES.3sg piano’)
(2) Zij is piano aan het spelen. ‘She is playing the piano.’ (Lit.: ‘She is at the play-INF’)
English:
(1) She is playing the piano. [in progress]*She plays the piano. [does not convey progress]
16
![Page 17: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
THE PROGRESSIVE IN DUTCH
• Both are optional grammatical categories which encode
progressive aspect
• Posture verb construction is less prevalent
• the ‘aan het construction’
• Use is prevalent in descriptions of change-in-state situations with
highly dynamic changes
• Used to describe activities
17
![Page 18: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RESEARCH QUESTION: TWOFOLD
1. Do six year-old Dutch-speaking children spontaneously express
continuity despite the fact that progressive aspect is a non-
obligatory grammatical category in Dutch?
2. Is there evidence that speakers use a non-obligatory
construction that grammatically encodes progressive aspect in
Dutch?
18
![Page 19: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
PARTICIPANTS
• Native (Flemish) Dutch speaking children
• between five and six years old
• Two schools in West-Flanders
• Informed consent
• 34 correctly conducted elicitation tasks
19
![Page 20: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ELICITATION MATERIAL
A B
(A). Ongoing activity
(B). Ongoing activity accompanied by completed action
(C). Ongoing activity
(D). Ongoing activity accompanied by completed action
C D20
![Page 21: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ELICITATION PROCESS
• Condition 1
• Spontaneous answer
• Condition 2
• Elicitation
• Control condition
• Priming
21
![Page 22: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ELICITATION PROCESS
• Eliciting = pointing out that the first activity is ongoing
• E.g. De twee meisjes/Ze zijn al even bezig met deze activiteit‘They've been doing this activity for a while’
• Priming = using the ‘aan het construction’ in a question
• E.g. Wat zijn deze kinderen aan het doen? ‘What are these children doing’
22
![Page 23: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
First pair of drawings AB
spontaneous useof the 'aan het construction'
no spontaneoususe of the 'aan
het construction'
use of theconstruction
after elicitation
no use of the construction
after elicitation
Condition 1 Condition 2
A B
23
![Page 24: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Second pair of drawings CD
spontaneous useof the 'aan het construction'
no spontaneoususe of the 'aan
het construction'
use of theconstruction
after elicitation
no use of the construction
after elicitation
C D
Condition 1 Condition 2
24
![Page 25: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Control condition
(depending on previous construction use)
No use of theconstruction to
describe AB
use of theconstructionafter priming
no use of theconstruction
after
No use of the construction to
describe CD
use of the construction after priming
no use of the construction
after
A B
25
![Page 26: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
RESULTS: FIRST PAIR OF DRAWINGS
AB‘aan het
construction’
Yes (8)
No (26)‘aan het
construction’
Yes (18)
No (8)64,71%
69.23%
Condition 1 Condition 2
Spontaneous speech Elicited speech
26
35,29%
![Page 27: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
RESULTS: SECOND PAIR OF DRAWINGS
CD'aan het
construction’
Yes (11)
No (23)‘aan het
construction’
Yes (14)
No (9)61,76%
60,87%
27
38.24%
Condition 1 Condition 2
Spontaneous speech Elicited speech
![Page 28: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
FINDINGS
• Most participants initially do not focus on the continuity even though they have a construction at their disposal that encodes continuity in Dutch grammar
• At variance with Slobin’s claim
• Most participants use the optional grammatical category after elicitation
• optional encoded categories can also be shown to have a bearing on ‘thinking for speaking’ under specific conditions
• Refinement of Slobin’s account (1996; 2003; 2008)
• Being a grammatically encoded category is a necessary but no sufficient condition for ‘thinking for speaking’. The encoded category must also be obligatory.
28
![Page 29: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CONCLUSION
• Categories which are encoded and obligatory
• Generally expressed
• Categories which are encoded and optional / non-obligatory
• Generally more ignored
• Encoded grammatical categories that are obligatory
• direct the speakers attention to certain aspects of an event in TFS
• Encoded grammatical categories that are optional
• direct the speakers attention to certain aspects of an event to a much lesser degree in TFS
29
![Page 30: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
LIMITATIONS
• Drawings (CD) contained written text
• Low number of participants
• Difficult to elicit child speech
30
![Page 31: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
FURTHER RESEARCH
• Replication study
• Inter-subject variation (age)
• Comparative study
• Eye-tracking study
• speakers have been shown to pay more attention to things which
they verbalise during a language task
31
![Page 32: Obligatory and optional grammatical categories in ...](https://reader030.fdocuments.net/reader030/viewer/2022040720/624d1a400cc0873c431d4f1a/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
REFERENCES
ANS = Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. (2012). Werkwoorden met aan het + infinitief als aanvulling. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from http://ans.ruhosting.nl/e-ans/18/05/05/01/body.html
Belligh, T. & K. Willems (2021). What’s in a code? The code-inference distinction in Neo-Gricean pragmatics, Relevance Theory and Integral Linguistics. Language Sciences 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101310
Behrens, B., Flecken, M., & Carroll, M. (2013). Progressive attraction: On the use and grammaticalization of progressive aspect in Dutch, Norwegian, and German. Journal of Germanic linguistics, 25(2), 95-136.
Flecken, M. (2011). Event conceptualization by early bilinguals: insights from linguistic and eye tracking data. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 14(1), 61−77.
Flecken, M. (2011). What native speaker judgments tell us about the grammaticalization of a progressive aspectual marker in Dutch. Linguistics, 49(3), 479-524.
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: MIT Press.
Slobin, D. (1996). From ‘Thought and Language’ to ‘Thinking for Speaking’. In J.J. Gumperz, & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought, 157-191. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Slobin, D. (2008). The child learns to think for speaking: Puzzles of crosslinguistic diversity in form-meaning mappings. Studies in Language Sciences, 7. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers, 3-22.
Van Pottelberge, J. (2004). Der am-Progressiv. Struktur und parallele Entwicklung in den kontinentalwestgermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Whorf, B. L., & Carroll, J. B. (1956). Language thought and reality. New York: MIT.32