O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Fiber Optic Strain Gages 8-17-06.
-
Upload
frederica-newton -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY Fiber Optic Strain Gages 8-17-06.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Fiber Optic Strain Gages
8-17-06
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Scope
What are we trying to do? Test one coil to see if it behaves like the analysis says it
should Monitor all coils in operation to see if 1) they are
behaving as expected during commissioning and 2) they are not degrading over time
Status TRC and C1 tested, but strain data inscrutable. Other
instr, such as deflect-o-meter, T/C, etc. ok
Problem Find a reliable way to measure strain and/or deflection
in operation
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Background
FISO gages used successfully on SNS, NSTX TF joint at or above room temperature
Fiber optic gages initially specified for NCSX because they solve known problems with resistance gages – mag field, noise, voltage isolation, etc.
FISO fiber optic gages purchased and glued to stainless sample and dipped in LN2, glue held
FISO gages glued to TF coil beam and tested at LN2 – gages initially worked, then 2 fell off (unknown cause), 1 stopped reading (due to wrong cable sheath material)
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Background (2)
FISO gages abandoned EM canceling resistance strain gages used for TRC
test, but results were not understandable and this was attributed to use of RTV gage coating
Subsequent tests performed with strain gages on stainless block in compression at LN2 temp, results appeared good
C1 coil test used strain gages, results inconclusive, problem attributed to magnetic field effects.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Path forward:
Qualify FISO gages at LN temperature Test Coil C5 with FISO gages Specify instrumentation for all other coils
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Qualify Fiber Optic Gages at LN Temperature
Research FISO gage applications Buy new FISO gages Perform adhesion tests at LN2 temps with variety
of glues Select glue system Perform cyclic strain tests at LN2 temp on sst
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
What is a Fiber Optic Strain Gage?
There are several types of fiber-optic strain gages, two of which comprise the majority of commercially available strain sensors. The most popular manufacturing method produces the Fabry-Perot strain sensor with the second most popular type being the Bragg-grating strain sensor.
The Fabry-Perot interferometer type of sensor uses a phase difference or “shift” between reference and sensing reflections of the fibers for making strain measurements
FISO gages under consideration are Fabry-Perot type
Definition: These sensors consist of a multimode optical fiber that transports white light, with the sensing element at the tip. The sensing element is defined by a micro capillary tube that holds the end of the fiber close to another small piece of thesame fiber, leaving a cavity in between. The fiber-ends that define the cavity are deposited with mirrors, so that the white light entering the cavity is reflected, and hence frequency-modulated in accordance to this length. When the sensor is bonded to a surface, the length of the cavity in the micro capillary expands or contracts exactly by the same amount of strain experienced by the surface ,
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
How do they compare to foil gages?
For Traditional Foil gages Fiber Optic Strain Gages Advantages over conventional electrical strain gauges:
• Immunity to electromagnetic interference• Immunity to leakage-to-ground problems• No inaccuracies associated with long,
multiple, signal lead requirements
Reference: Hare, David A., and Moore, Thomas C., “Chamcleristics of Extrinsic Fabry-Perot Inlerfcromc1”nc (EFPI) Fiber-optic Slnin Gages,”NASAKP-2000-2 10639, Deccmbrr 2000.
Influenced by EMI at Cryo
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Prior work done on FISO gages at NASA - Down to -100 oC
20040000044 NASA Stennis Space Center, Bay Saint Louis, MS, USAExperimental Evaluation of White Light Fabry-Perot Interferometry Fiber-Optic Strain Gages when Measuring Small StrainsSt.Cyr, William; Figueroa, Fernando; VanDyke, David; McVay, Greg; Mitchell, Mark; January 10, 2002; 17 pp.; In EnglishContract(s)/Grant(s): NAS13-650Report No.(s): SE-2002-01-00001-SSC; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A03, Hardcopy
An experimental study was conducted to evaluate whether fiber optic strain gages (FOSG) are ‘better’ sensors than typical foil gages. A particularly attractive feature of FOSG was their specified resolution of 0.01% of full-scale (0.1 micro strain for 1000 micro strain full-scale). This feature would make FOSG practical tank level sensors, by measuring very small strains on the support structure of a tank. A specific application in mind was to measure liquid oxygen tank level, with support beams that were predicted to contract approximately 11 micro strain as the tank goes from empty to full. Among various fiber optic technologies currently available, Fabry-Perot Interferometry using white light was selected. This technology exhibits highly desirable feature such as absolute strain measurement, linearity over its full-scale, and temperature compensation. However, experiment results suggest that the resolution is 0.8 micro strain, at best, calibration from one sensor to another can be off by 2.4 - 11.2%, and that temperature compensation is not fully predictable, with errors of up to 3.5 micro strain over an11C range. Hence, when compared with classic foil gages, FOSG possess less accuracy, similar resolution and repeatability (precision), and superior linearity over their entire operating range. They are immune to EMI and their signals suffer minimal degradation over long distances. It is also expected that drift with time will be minimal in FOSG whereas the gage factor of foil sensors changes over time when exposed to varying environmental conditions. In conclusion, FOSG are ‘better’ than foil gages as long as the application allows calibration of individual units as installed for operation.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Prior work done on FISO gages at NASA (2) small deformations at -100 oC20040050782 NASA Stennis Space Center, Bay Saint Louis, MS, USA
Fiber-Optic Strain-Gage Tank Level Measurement System for Cryogenic Propellants
Figueroa, Fernando; Mitchell, Mark; Langford, Lester; May 18, 2004; 5 pp.; In English
Contract(s)/Grant(s): NAS13-650
Report No.(s): SE-2003-12-00109-SSC; No Copyright; Avail: CASI; A01, Hardcopy
Measurement of tank level, particularly for cryogenic propellants, has proven to be a difficult problem. Current methods
based on differential pressure, capacitance sensors, temperature sensors, etc.; do not provide sufficiently accurate or
robust measurements, especially at run time. These methods are designed to measure tank-level, but when the fluids
are in supercritical state, the liquid-gas interface disappears. Furthermore, there is a need for a non-intrusive
measurement system; that is, the sensors should not require tank modifications and/or disturb the fluids. This paper
describes a simple, but effective method to determine propellant mass by measuring very small deformations of the
structure supporting the tank. Results of a laboratory study to validate the method, and experimental data from a
deployed system are presented. A comparison with an existing differential pressure sensor shows that the strain gage
system provides a much better quality signal across all regimes during an engine test. Experimental results also
show that the use of fiber optic strain gages (FOSG) over classic foil strain gages extends the operation
time (before the system becomes uncalibrated), and increases accuracy. Finally, a procedure is defined
whereby measurements from the FOSG mounted on the tank supporting structure are compensated using
measurements of a FOSG mounted on a reference plate and temperature measurements of the structure. Results
describing the performance of a deployed system that measures tank level during propulsion tests are included.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Fiber Optic strain gage worked for S/C accel. magnet
1994 and 1995 papers LBNL accelerator magnet CTD-101 and Stycast 2850 FT adhesive Reliable results No mention of gage de-bonding Are continuing attempts to contact authors
J.M. van Oort and H.H.J. ten Kate. "A fiber optics sensor for strain and StRSs measurements m superconducting accelerator magnets," IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. Vol. 30. No. 4. July 1994. pp. 260-263.
J.M. van Oort and H.H.J. ten Kate and Ronald Scanlan. "A Fiber-Optic Strain Measurement and Quech Loacalization System for Use in Superconducting Accelerator Magnets," IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. Vol. 5. No. 2. June 1995. pp. 882-885.
“The ability of the fiber optic sensor system to survive in a cryogenic environment under high pressure has been demonstrated.”
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
LN2 adhesion test includes several glue types and applied strain
Glue must be room temp cure, elevated temperature cure is not practical
Stycast 2850 FT is primary candidate, UV cured glue from FISO, and others as identified from literature.
Gages applied to thin strip and put in bending at LN2 temp.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cyclic strain test requires new fixture/chamber
Seal weld
tank
Fiber Optic Strain Gage
Data Acquistion
Wedge Grip
Cylindrical GRIP
1.5 in
Clevis
Clevis pin
Threded rod possibly with steps
MTS Fluid machine at ORNL Stress Lab
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Qualify FISO gages - cost and scheduleFISO gage - test plan cost estimate
start finish labor hrs labor $materials
$ S/CPlanningprepare plan, cost est. 4-Aug-06 18-Aug-06 12 $1,800peer review 18-Aug-06 18-Aug-06 14 $2,450
ProcuringS/C for Jim Tsai 15-Aug-06 22-Aug-06 4 $700talk to FISO 18-Aug-06 25-Aug-06 8 $1,100specify/order gages 19-Aug-06 23-Aug-06 4 $400 $6,600buy special fixtures 1-Sep-06 15-Sep-06 4 $700 $2,500buy test coupons 23-Aug-06 30-Aug-06 4 $700 $2,000
LN2 Adhsesion testwrite test plan 21-Aug-06 28-Aug-06 8 $1,400design LN2 adhesion test 21-Aug-06 28-Aug-06 20 $3,200set up LN2 adhesion test 23-Aug-06 30-Aug-06 18 $2,550 $250perform LN2 adhesion tests 30-Aug-06 15-Sep-06 24 $3,600 $50write report 15-Sep-06 22-Sep-06 16 $2,800
Strain cycle testwrite test plan 18-Aug-06 25-Aug-06 8 $1,400design strain cycle test 11-Aug-06 1-Sep-06 48 $7,800set up strain test 1-Sep-06 22-Sep-06 32 $5,000 $250perform strain cycle test 22-Sep-06 13-Oct-06 24 $3,600 $50write report 13-Oct-06 20-Oct-06 18 $3,150
Total 266 $42,350 $11,700
contingency 40% $16,940 $4,680
Grand total $75,670
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
C5 test
Repeat of C1 test, but: FISO strain gages instead of resistance gages Some FISO temp. gages in addition to T/C Dial indicator for deflect-o-meter with digital
output Better temperature control in cryostat Modified base support to provide known
deflection constraints
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Proposed Instrumentation for C5 test
16 strain gages - FOS-N-BA-C1-F1-M2-RX-ST - $195 each
range of – 7 000 to 3000 µε at – 200 C: extra $100 per gage to get +- 5,000 µε 2 Veloce boxes – VEL-MOD-50 –
$38,000 each OR 2 BUS-MOD –$26,000 each
2 Veloce rack mount chassis – VEL CHA – $1995 each VELOCE System channel modules, up to 8 channels; Upgradeable on number of
channels with sliding modules.
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Strain Gage InstallationStarin Gage # Shell Hole Number Side Location Measuring Direction
1 7 A winding pack Winding direction
2 7 A casting Winding direction
3 7 A winding pack Transverse direction
4 14 A casting Winding direction
5 33 A casting Transverse direction
6 68 B winding pack Winding direction
7 68 B casting Winding direction
8 68 B winding pack Transverse direction
9 68 B casting Transverse direction
10 50 B casting Winding direction
11 50 B casting Transverse direction
12 50 B winding pack Winding direction
13 42 A casting Winding direction
14 68 A casting Winding direction
15 Near Leads Near A Casting Perpendicular to lead holes
21 Outer shell Near A Casting Perpendicular to outer flange
22 Outer shell Near B Casting Perpendicular to outer flange
16 7
17 7
18 68
19 68
20 42
Redunanat for gage # 7
Redunanat for gage # 13
Redunanat for gage # 1
Redunanat for gage # 2
Redunanat for gage # 6
16 gages read at a time
Eliminate all winding pack gages due to potential glue adhesive problems
12 on casting (two new gages installed away form tee/windings on outer surface of casting.
4 redundant gages
Numbering is listed the same as before in this table
OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORYU. S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Cost/benefit of A,B coil tests TRC and Coil C1 tests showed that the thermal and gross
deflection of the coils match the analytical models to first order
Tests of Type A and B would add only second order information, we think, with costs of: Analysis Cryostat and buswork mods Coil setup and testing costs
Intermediate option: 15 ka test at room temp would still require analysis but cold check answers at 1/6 max strain