Nuryani Y. Rustaman Science EducationScience...

27
EVALUATION IN EVALUATION IN SCIENCE EDUCATION SCIENCE EDUCATION Nuryani Y. Rustaman Science Education Science Education INDONESIA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION

Transcript of Nuryani Y. Rustaman Science EducationScience...

EVALUATION IN EVALUATION IN SCIENCE EDUCATIONSCIENCE EDUCATION

Nuryani Y. Rustaman Science EducationScience Education

INDONESIA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION

EVALUATIONEVALUATIONEVALUATION EVALUATION IN SCIENCE EDUCATIONIN SCIENCE EDUCATION

!! 3 Credit Semester Hours3 Credit Semester Hoursd S STd S ST!! 2nd SEMESTER2nd SEMESTER

!! Compulsary for SCompulsary for S--2 Program2 Program!! (Post) Graduate Students of(Post) Graduate Students of!! (Post) Graduate Students of (Post) Graduate Students of

Biology/Chemistry/Physics EducationBiology/Chemistry/Physics Education!! Elective course for SElective course for S--3 Program with Pure 3 Program with Pure

Science background (Biologists, Chemists, Science background (Biologists, Chemists, Physicists)Physicists)

Feb2009 2nrustaman's file

REFERENCESREFERENCESREFERENCES REFERENCES

!! National Research Council/NRC (1996)National Research Council/NRC (1996)!! National Research Council/NRC. (1996). National Research Council/NRC. (1996). Assesment in Science Education. In Assesment in Science Education. In National National Science Education StandardScience Education Standard Wasington D C :Wasington D C :Science Education StandardScience Education Standard. Wasington D.C.: . Wasington D.C.: National Academy Press.National Academy Press.

!! Stiggins R J (1994)Stiggins R J (1994) Student Centered ClassroomStudent Centered Classroom!! Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student Centered Classroom Student Centered Classroom Assessment.Assessment.

Feb2009 3nrustaman's file

FURTHUR READINGFURTHUR READINGFURTHUR READINGFURTHUR READING!! Standard Kompetensi Lulusan (SKL)Standard Kompetensi Lulusan (SKL)

St d d I iSt d d I i!! Standard IsiStandard Isi!! Standard Penilaian (?)Standard Penilaian (?)!! Popham, W.J. (2005). Popham, W.J. (2005). Classroom Assessment: What Classroom Assessment: What

Teachers Need to KnowTeachers Need to Know. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.yy!! Marzano,, R.J. (2006). Marzano,, R.J. (2006). Classroom Assessment & Grading that Classroom Assessment & Grading that

Work. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCDWork. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD!! Anderson, I.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). Anderson, I.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for A Taxonomy for

Learning Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Taxomoy ofLearning Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Taxomoy ofLearning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Taxomoy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Taxomoy of Education ObjectivesEducation Objectives. New York: Longman. New York: Longman

!! Herman, … (1993), Assessing Herman, … (1993), Assessing !! Haladyna, .. (1997). Haladyna, .. (1997). Writing Test for Higher Order Thinking. ….Writing Test for Higher Order Thinking. ….!! Jacob, .L.C. & Chase, C.I. (1992). Jacob, .L.C. & Chase, C.I. (1992). Developing and using Test Developing and using Test

Effectively: A Guide for FacultyEffectively: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey. San Francisco: Jossey--Bass Bass !! Zainul, A. (2001). Zainul, A. (2001). Alternative Assessment.Alternative Assessment. Jakarta: Pusat Jakarta: Pusat

Antar Universitas Dirjen DikTi DepdiknasAntar Universitas Dirjen DikTi DepdiknasAntar Universitas. Dirjen DikTi, Depdiknas.Antar Universitas. Dirjen DikTi, Depdiknas.

Feb2009 4nrustaman's file

Standar Calon Guru112

11

HOTS

Pengertian Alternatif

2 10

HOTSPeranan

Pengukuran hasil3

9

ASESMEN DLM PEND. IPA

HubunganPengukuran hasil

Belajar Kognitif3

4

Hasil BelajarStandar Asesmen

4

8

PelaksanaanKomponen proses

asesmen7

Tipe Standar Asesmen

5

6Feb2009 5nrustaman's file

Interelasi antar konsep: Doran, Lawrenz & Helgenson (1995)

EVALUATION

TESTINGTESTING

MEASUREMENT

ASSESSMENT

Evaluation: to evaluate the data

hi h ll t d

Assessment = the process of collecting data which h th d l t fwhich was collected

through assessmentshows the development of learning (Aikenhead, 1997)

Feb2009 6nrustaman's file

HUBUNGAN

EVALUASI ASESMEN

" M k k d d" Lebih menekankan pada

pengukuran hasil belajar" Pada akhir pembelajaran

" Menekankan pada proses danhasil belajar

" Dilaksanakan selama pembelajaran" Berpihak pada yang diases" U t k b k t i" Untuk mengembangkan potensi

individu yang diases " Terkait pencapaian kurikulum

PENGUKURAN # Mendapat informasi tentangkarakteristik subyek dalam bentuk kuantitatif

INSTRUMEN

TES NON TES

# Penilaian Acuan Norma# Penilaian Acuan Patokan

(PAN & PAP)TES NON TES

Tertulis, lisan, observasikinerja atau proses

Feb2009 7nrustaman's file

Assessment literates adalah mereka yang memahami prinsipAssessment literates adalah mereka yang memahami prinsip dasar asesmen yang baik. Asesmen yang baik rmenghubungkan pembelajaran berkualitas dan upaya untuk mempertahankan penggunaanberkualitas dan upaya untuk mempertahankan penggunaan asesmen alternatif yang seimbang. Kita harus menunjukkan standard tinggi dengan bertindak secara bertujuan untuk mempertemukan konteks akhir semua j pstandar dan dengan menunjukkannya kepada yang lain apabila mereka gagal melakukan pengujian.Pd masa depan asesmen akan terus melayani u/ 2 keperluan:

$ penyedia informasi untuk pengambilan keputusan and$ sebagai perangkat pengajaran (teaching tools)untuk mengambil manfaat dari kekuatan asesmen untuk mempromosikan pembelajaranmempromosikan pembelajaran.

Feb2009 8nrustaman's file

Pemikiran yang jelas dan komunikasi

yang efektify g

Guru yang bertugasAsesmen sebagaibagian pembelajaran

1bagian pembelajaran

PRINSIPDASAR

Siswa sebagai pengguna utama

Perhatian terhadap dampak interpersonal

Asesmenberkualitas tinggi

Target yang jelas dan tepat

Feb2009 9nrustaman's file

Changing RolesChanging Roles FormerFormer CurrentCurrentTeacherTeacher TeachTeach Define outcomes teachDefine outcomes teachTeacherTeacher TeachTeach Define outcomes, teach, Define outcomes, teach,

conduct the primary conduct the primary assessmentsassessments

StudentStudent Be assessedBe assessed Assess Assess self and peersself and peers

PrincipalPrincipal Interprete Interprete standardized test standardized test resultsresults

Interprete results and provide Interprete results and provide support in classroom support in classroom assessmentassessment

Ch i P tiCh i P ti FF C tC tChanging PracticesChanging Practices FormerFormer CurrentCurrent

PurposesPurposes AccountabilityAccountability Accountability, instructionAccountability, instruction

UsesUses Test results filter from Test results filter from top downtop down

Results filter top down and Results filter top down and from classroom upfrom classroom uptop downtop down from classroom upfrom classroom up

TargetsTargets General in natureGeneral in natureNot openly sharedNot openly shared

Highly focusedHighly focusedOpenly shared with allOpenly shared with all

MethodMethod Primarily SelectedPrimarily Selected Primarily Essay andPrimarily Essay andMethodMethod Primarily Selected Primarily Selected ResponseResponse

Primarily Essay and Primarily Essay and Performance Assessment with Performance Assessment with some Selected Responsesome Selected Response

Feb2009 10nrustaman's file

SHIFT FROMSHIFT FROM TOWARDSTOWARDSSHIFT FROMSHIFT FROM TOWARDSTOWARDS

Assessing knowledgeAssessing knowledge Assessing skills and understandingsAssessing skills and understandings

Assessing productsAssessing products AssessingAssessing processprocessAssessing productsAssessing products Assessing Assessing processprocess

External end course assessmentExternal end course assessment Internal during course assessmentInternal during course assessment

Written assessment onlyWritten assessment only Use of a Use of a variety of methodsvariety of methods & & evidenceevidence

NormNorm--referencingreferencing CriterionCriterion referencingreferencing

Pass/fail summative assessmentPass/fail summative assessment Formative identification of strengths & Formative identification of strengths & weaknesses and recording of positive weaknesses and recording of positive achievementachievement

Feb2009 11nrustaman's file

Less emphasis onLess emphasis on More emphasis onMore emphasis onA i h i il dA i h i il d A i h iA i h i hi hl l dhi hl l dAssessing what is easily measuredAssessing what is easily measured Assessing what isAssessing what is most highly valuedmost highly valued

Assessing discrete knowledgeAssessing discrete knowledge Assessing rich, wellAssessing rich, well--structured structured knowledgeknowledgeknowledgeknowledge

Assessing scientific knowledgeAssessing scientific knowledge Assessing scientific understanding and Assessing scientific understanding and reasoningreasoning

Assessing to learn what Ss do notAssessing to learn what Ss do not Assessing to learn what Ss doAssessing to learn what Ss doAssessing to learn what Ss do not Assessing to learn what Ss do not knowknow

Assessing to learn what Ss do Assessing to learn what Ss do understandunderstand

Assessing only achievementAssessing only achievement Assessing achievement and Assessing achievement and opportunity opportunity to learnto learn

End of term assessments by teachersEnd of term assessments by teachers Ss engage in Ss engage in ongoing assessment of ongoing assessment of their work and what of otherstheir work and what of others

Development of external assessments just Development of external assessments just Teachers involvedTeachers involved in the development of in the development of p jp jby measurement experts by measurement experts

ppexternal assessmentsexternal assessments

Feb2009 12nrustaman's file

Performance and/or authentic assessment;Science processes derived from data;Cooperative and collaborative;Hands-on and minds-on; P ti l kill d i ti killPractical skills and communicative skills;Scientific attitudes and value embedded in sciencescience.

Feb2009 13nrustaman's file

Tipe/Kategori Utama p gTarget Pencapaian yang penting

Penguasaan substansi pengetahuan bidang studi;Kemampuan Ss untuk menggunakan pengetahuan untuk bernalar dan memecahkan masalah;untuk bernalar dan memecahkan masalah;Kemampuan u/ menunjukkan keterampilan tertentu, seperti tindakan-tindakan psikomotor;Kemampuan u/ menciptakan jenis-jenis produktertentu, seperti karya kerajinan atau robot;Perolehan jenis perasaan atau keadaan afektifPerolehan jenis perasaan atau keadaan afektif tertentu, spt sikap, minat, predisposisi motivasi.

(Stiggins,1994: 67)(Stiggins,1994: 67)

Feb2009 14nrustaman's file

Target sangat terfok s kh s sn a padaTarget sangat terfokus, khususnya pada: penalaran, pemahaman pada konten bidang studi serta aplikasinya;studi serta aplikasinya;Kebiasaan berpikir produktif (berpikir kritis, berpikir kreatif, pengaturan diri);p p g )Berpikir tingkat tinggi atau higher order thinking skills (HOTS);Di i i bid t t t ti iDisposisi bidang tertentu seperti science disposition, mathematics disposition.

Feb2009 15nrustaman's file

dil k k t d d l h KBM ( ldilaksanakan secara terpadu dgn seluruh KBM (awal, tengah, akhir) dan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah dalam rentang waktu tertentumelibatkan multimetode & multitargetmelibatkan multimetode & multitargetkeseimbangan ranah kognitif-afektif-psikomotorbentuk/model: formal/informal, di dalam/luar kelasmenggambarkan keutuhan profil prestasi & kemajuanmenggambarkan keutuhan profil prestasi & kemajuan belajar individu siswamelibatkan siswa, orangtua & guru dilakukan dengan pengumpulan g p g p

kerja (portofolio), hasil karya (produk),penugasan (proyek), kinerja (performa), tes tertulis.

Feb2009 16nrustaman's file

Cara Pengumpulan InformasiNo

Cara penilaian

Apa yg dinilai Bentuk Penilaian

1. Tertulis, Jawaban B-S, Isian singkat, Pilihan Ganda,1. Tertulis, objektif

Jawabantertulis

B S, Isian singkat, Pilihan Ganda, Menjodohkan

2. Tertulis, subjektif

Jawabantertulis

Pengerjaan soal, latihan, reading comprehension data pertanyaan esaisubjektif tertulis comprehension, data-pertanyaan, esai bebas, esai berstrktur

3. Lisan Suara Tanya jawab singkat, kuis, pelafalan, membaca nyaring, menyimak, instruksi lisan, percakapan

4. Unjuk Penampilan Permainan, bermain peran, drama, jkerja /perbuatan

/tindakandemonstrasi, olahraga, senam, permainan musik, bernyanyi, dinamika kelompok,berdoa, debat, memelihara ternak/ tanaman, deklamasi pidato/khotbah diskusideklamasi, pidato/khotbah, diskusi, wawancara, bercerita

Feb2009 17nrustaman's file

No Cara penilaian

Apa yg dinilai Bentuk penilaian

5. Karya 3 dimensi

Patung, kerajinan tangan, alat, model, pesawat sederhana, ternak, simpul tali temali janur hiasan buah buahan

Produkpenilaian dinilai

temali, janur, hiasan buah-buahan.6. Karya 2

dimensiPuisi, karangan, gambar, peta/ denah, tulisan, desain, makalah, laporan

b i/ lidik / k i

Portofolio

observasi/penyelidikan/ eksperimen, sinopsis, naskah pidato, naskah drama, rumus, kartu ucapan, surat, komposisi musik teks lagu resep masakanmusik, teks lagu, resep masakan

7. Sikap Tingkahlaku

Skala sikap, catatan anekdot, penilaian diri, sosiogram, kuesioner, buku harian, , g , , ,ungkapan perasaan, pengamatan perilaku

8 Tugas/ Tanggung Penugasan (assignment) penilaian8. Tugas/Proyek

Tanggungjawab

Penugasan (assignment), penilaian proyek, kerja individual, kerja kelompok

Feb2009 18nrustaman's file

!! VALIDITASVALIDITAS: hasil penilaian dapat ditafsirkan sebagai apa : hasil penilaian dapat ditafsirkan sebagai apa yang akan dinilai. yang akan dinilai.

!! RELIABILITAS:RELIABILITAS: hasil penilaian ajeg, menggambarkanhasil penilaian ajeg, menggambarkan!! RELIABILITAS:RELIABILITAS: hasil penilaian ajeg, menggambarkan hasil penilaian ajeg, menggambarkan kemampuan yang sesungguhnya. kemampuan yang sesungguhnya.

!! FOKUS KOMPETENSIFOKUS KOMPETENSI: pencapaian kompetensi yang sesuai : pencapaian kompetensi yang sesuai kur materi terkait langsung dengan indikator pencapaiankur materi terkait langsung dengan indikator pencapaiankur, materi terkait langsung dengan indikator pencapaian. kur, materi terkait langsung dengan indikator pencapaian.

!! KOMPREHENSIF:KOMPREHENSIF: informasi yang diperoleh cukup untuk informasi yang diperoleh cukup untuk membuat keputusan. membuat keputusan.

!! OBJEKTIFOBJEKTIF: adil, terencana, berkesinambungan : adil, terencana, berkesinambungan !! MENDIDIK MENDIDIK : penilaian untuk memperbaiki proses : penilaian untuk memperbaiki proses

pembelajaran dan meningkatkan kualitas belajarpembelajaran dan meningkatkan kualitas belajarpembelajaran dan meningkatkan kualitas belajar pembelajaran dan meningkatkan kualitas belajar

$ BAGAIMANA CARANYA ???Feb2009 19nrustaman's file

Performance and/or authentic assessment;Science processes derived from data;Cooperative and collaborative;Hands-on and minds-on; P ti l kill d i ti killPractical skills and communicative skills;Scientific attitudes and value embedded in sciencescience.

Feb2009 20nrustaman's file

SELECTED SELECTED RESPONSERESPONSE

ESSAY ESSAY ASSESSASSESS

PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT

PERSONAL PERSONAL COMMUNICOMMUNIRESPONSERESPONSE ASSESSASSESS

MENTMENTASSESSMENTASSESSMENT COMMUNICOMMUNI--

CATIONCATION

KNOWKNOW VVVVVVVV

REASONREASON

SKILLSKILL VVVVVV

PRODUCTPRODUCT VVVVVVVVVVVV

AFFECTAFFECT VVVVVV

Feb2009 21nrustaman's file

Group, self and peer assessment can be used $ for formative assessment (especially)$as summative assessment as well$as summative assessment as well

Group Assessment A major advantage of group assessment is that the marking burden for staff can be significantly reduced. There are also strong educational benefits, including the development of a range of important skills such as team and leadership skillsrange of important skills such as team and leadership skills, communication skills and organisational skills. In addition, teams or groups can achieve more than individuals and tackle more complex issuestackle more complex issues.

Feb2009 22nrustaman's file

Students internalizeStudents understand the process of getting to the standard

the criteria for high-quality work

12 Teachers involve students in the

monitoring process and shift some of the responsibility for documentingthe responsibility for documenting and justifying learning to the students

R h h d d hResearch has demonstrated that high-performing learners do:

(i) Self-monitor; (ii) Self-correct; (iii) Use feedback from peers to

guide their learning processguide their learning process

Feb2009 23nrustaman's file

Peer & Self assessment : $ innovative forms of assessment that support student learning.

Self Assessment:Self Assessment: * a process where students are involved in & are responsible for

assessing their own piece of work. * encourages Ss to become independent learners & increase motivation. g p* may be used to help develop in students the ability to examine & think

critically about their learning, * help Ss to determine what criteria should be used in judging their work

and to apply these objectively to their own work % to facilitate theirand to apply these objectively to their own work % to facilitate their continuing learning.

* may be undertaken as part of the assessment requirements of a course or as an exercise within the course's requirements. q

Feb2009 24nrustaman's file

Peer Assessment Peer Assessment !! = where Ss are involved in the= where Ss are involved in the assessment of the assessment of the

work of other students with a clear understanding of work of other students with a clear understanding of what they are to look for in their peers' work.what they are to look for in their peers' work.

!! may be used to develop in students the may be used to develop in students the ability to workability to workccooperativelyooperatively, to be , to be critical of others’ workcritical of others’ work and and receive receive critical appraisals ofcritical appraisals of andand feedback on their own workfeedback on their own workcritical appraisals of, critical appraisals of, and and feedback on their own work. feedback on their own work.

!! may provide students with some may provide students with some insightinsight into the into the criteria criteria to be used for marking a piece of assessable work. to be used for marking a piece of assessable work. g pg p

!! may also be a way of ascribing a mark or grade to Ss’ may also be a way of ascribing a mark or grade to Ss’ work for summative purposes.work for summative purposes.

Feb2009 25nrustaman's file

Assessment Criteria

Sample Assessment Criteria for an Oral Presentation

Sample Criteria for Assessment of Team Functioning

Does the content relate to the title and/or purpose of the presentation? The message l ? Th t i t t? C l i

The student is engaged in the group and with the groupclear? The argument consistent? Conclusions

drawn appropriately? Sufficient evidence to support arguments? Evidence of appropriate critical thinking? The focus sharp? The presenter put her/his own

group and with the group can show qualities of leadership is able to provide direction for group activity is involved in the execution of thep p p

point of view? Organization and management (time-keeping, management of Qs or comments)Presentation (audibility, articulation, presence, posture eye contact confidence

is involved in the execution of the project work can play a supporting role of others in group activity can suggest solutionsposture, eye contact, confidence

Use of resources (quality, fitness for purpose, OHT, handouts, use of board or flipchart, use of other resources)Overall structure (coherency, appropriateness of

can suggest solutions is involved in the presentation of the group's work demonstrates interest in the maintenance of the groupstructure, identity of beginning, summary, middle

and end conclusion, 'signposting' of structure Creativity (use of imagination in content or presentation, originality)

maintenance of the group functioning as well as the project

Feb2009 26nrustaman's file

Feb2009 27nrustaman's file