The Placebo Effect. Placebo Effect Introduction sFTgirKXHk 4 mins.
Nuevos datos de impacto€¦ · Asociación entre sulfonilureas y mortalidad cardiovascular frente...
Transcript of Nuevos datos de impacto€¦ · Asociación entre sulfonilureas y mortalidad cardiovascular frente...
Nuevos datos de impacto
publicados sobre los fármacos
para diabetes en el último año.
Dr. Luís Ávila
Dr. Joan Barrot
Avogaro A, Fadini GP, Sesti G, Bonora E, Del Prato S. Continued efforts to translate diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials into clinical practice. Cardiovasc Diabetol [Internet]. 11 de agosto de 2016 [citado 12 de octubre de 2016];15. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982334/
Evidencia de los antidiabéticos en la insuficiencia renal
Fármacos :
• Metformina
• SU
• Glitazonas
• IDPP4
• inh SGLT-2
• Análogos GLP-1
• Insulinas
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Metformina :
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
BMJ 2016;352:h6748 doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6748
• Risk of bias in UKPDS
• Is UKPDS 10 year follow-up report reliable?
Metformina :
• Tratamiento “primera” linea DM2.
• Tratamiento pre-Diabetes, prevenir o retrasar la progresión a DM
• Efectivo en el tratamiento de la Diabetes Gestacional
• Efectivo en el tratamiento de SOPQ
• Uso en “síndrome metabólico”
• Beneficios CV (PA , lípidos , endotelio, peso, fibrinogeno..)
• efecto antioncogénico?
• efecto anti-edad?
• FDA /EMA, indicación en FG
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Diabetes treatments and risk of heart failure, cardiovascular disease, and all cause
mortality: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 13 de julio de 2016;354:i3477.
http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i3477.long
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Diabetes treatments and risk of heart failure, cardiovascular disease, and all cause
mortality: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 13 de julio de 2016;354:i3477.
http://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i3477.long
Rados DV, Pinto LC, Remonti LR, Leitão CB, Gross JL (2016) The Association between Sulfonylurea Use and All-Cause and
Cardiovascular Mortality: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. PLoS Med 13(4): e1001992.
doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001992
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001992
Asociación entre sulfonilureas y mortalidad cardiovascular frente aa placebo
Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk
for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality,
myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence
supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute
risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded.
Sulfonilureas
de segunda y
tercera
generación
Pladevall M, Riera-Guardia N, Margulis AV, Varas-Lorenzo C, Calingaert B, Perez-
Gutthann S. Cardiovascular risk associated with the use of glitazones, metformin and
sufonylureas: meta-analysis of published observational studies. BMC Cardiovascular
Disorders. 2016;16:14.
http://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-016-0187-5
• Metformin and rosiglitazone versus
sulfonylureas I 2 ≥ 70 %
• Sulfonylurea versus metformin I 2 = 41 %
• Pioglitazone versus metformin I 2 = 17 %
Pioglitazone use and risk of bladder cancer: population based cohort study
- bmj.i1541.full.pdf [Internet]. [citado 25 de octubre de 2016]. Disponible
en: http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/352/bmj.i1541.full.pdf
La pioglitazona
se relaciona
con el cancer de
vejiga
Korhonen P, Heintjes EM, Williams R, Hoti F, Christopher S, Majak M, et al. Pioglitazone use
and risk of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective cohort study using
datasets from four European countries. BMJ. 16 de agosto de 2016;354:i3903.
http://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/354/bmj.i3903.full.pdf
La pioglitazona NO se relaciona
con el cancer de vejiga
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol . January 22,2016
• IDPP4
• Long-acting DPP4i (omarigliptin) • similar efficacy and tolerability as Sita (phase 3)
• iSGLT2
• Severals further SGLT2 • similar efficacy in CT
• Sotagliflozin (inhibits both SGLT2 and 1)
• iSGLT1 (phase 1)
Diabetes care 2001;24:1614-1619
Am Heart J. 2011;162:938-48
Parry. Circ Heart Fail.2015.
Heart failure in Type 2 diabetes
DM ↑ prevalencia de IC 10-22% , 4v. más vs. no DM
Incidencia aumenta con la edad.
Riesgo IC en DM2 , relación HbA1c
A1c < 6% , HR 1.60 (1.38-1.86)
A1c > 10%, HR 1.80 (1.60-2.16)
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE AND TECOS:
Hospitalization for heart Failure Meta-analysis.
N Eng J Med 2013;369:1317-1326
N Eng J Med 2013;369:1327-1335
N Eng J Med 2013;373:232–242
Study Drug
n/N(%)
Placebo
n/N(%)RR IC 95% p value
SAVOR-TIMI
(Saxa vs. placebo)
289/8280
3.5%
228/8212
2.8%1.27 1.07-1.51 0.09
EXAMINE
(Alo vs. placebo)
106/1701
3.9%
89/2679
3.3%1.19 0.89-1.58 0.23
TECOS
(Sita vs. placebo)
228/7332
3.1%
229/7339
3.1%1.00 0.81-1.19 0.98
SAVOR+EXAMINE+
TECOS
623/18313
3.4%
546/18230
3.0%1.14 0.97-1.34
0 21Favors
Treatment
Favors
placebo
ADVANCE 4.8%
ACCORD 2%
VADT/ORIGIN/UKPDS/DCCT - HF EXCLUDED
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
• Cohorts 1,499,650 ; 29,741 hospitalized for HF (9.2 events per 1000 persons per year).
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
N Engl J Med 2016;374:1145-54
with HF no HF
No history of HF (0.82; 0.67-1.00). With HF (0.86; 0.62-1.19)
• n 196.986 T2DM previous HF (2009 and 2013).
• n 30.204 DPP-4i and 166.782 non-users.
• outcomes: all-cause mortality, combination MI and ischaemic stroke, and hospitalisation for HF.
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Ou S-M, et al. Heart 2016;0:1–7.
BMJ 2016;352:i610
43 trials (n=68 775) and 12 observational studies (n=1 777 358).
38 trials reported HF (n 21.680 ) , 87% trials reported FH as serious AE
Risk of HF iDPP4 vs control 0.97 ( 0.61-1.56)
Risk of hospital admission for HF 1.13 ( 1.00-1.26) 5 trials
Risk of hospital admission for HF 1.41 ( 0.95-2.09) 12 observational studies
vilda
Lina
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Association Between Hospitalization for Heart Failure
and DPP4i in T2DM
Diab Care 2016.DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0764
With baseline CVD No baseline CVD
IPDD4 vs. SU RR 0.95 ( 0.78-1.15) p 0.580 RR 0.59 ( 0.38-0.89) p 0.013
SAVOR ( Saxa) heart failure HR, 1.27(1.07- 1.51)
TECOS ( Sita ) heart failure HR, 1.00 (0.83- 1.20)
EXAMINE ( Alo) heart failure HR, 1.19 (0.89 -1.50)
CAROLINA (Lina) ……} IDPP4 vs. SU
Saxa vs. Sita
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
• T2DM and osteoporosis are both common and chronic conditions that increase with age
• Insulin or SU or thiazolidinediones , might further increase the risk of osteoporotic fracture .
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Mar 1:jc20154180.
n 8.894 Sita, n 63.834 no Sita , 181.139 per/any de seguiment
Agent RR (95% CI) p-value
Stagliptin
Metformin
SU
ThiazolidineIns
Insulin
1.1 (0.8-1.4)
1.0 (0.8-1.2)
1.3 (1.1-1.5)
1.2 (1.04-1.5)
2.1 (1.04-2.8)
0.7
1.0
0.008
0.019
<0.001
SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE AND TECOS:Meta-analysis of Pancreatitis.
Unpublished. ADA 2015
RR IC 95% p value
SAVOR-TIMI
(Saxa vs. placebo)1.375 0.721- 2.619 0.09
EXAMINE
(Alo vs. placebo)1.490 0.608 - 3.651 0.23
TECOS
(Sita vs. placebo) 1.921 0.955 - 3.864 0.98
SAVOR+EXAMINE+TECOS 1.578 1.038 - 2.399
0,1 101Favors
Treatment
Favors
placebo
11ª Jornada de l’Associació Catalana de Diabetes
Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular safety of DPP4i: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled CV outcome trials
Diab Obe Meta, 2016 ;18: 295–299.
SAVOR , EXAMINE and TECOS trials, 3334 CV events
RR CV death+IAM nonfatal+AVC nonfatal 0.99 (0.93-1.06)
RR CV death 1.01 (0.91-1.12)
RR nonfatal IAM 0.98 (0.89-1.09)
RR nonfatal AVC 1.00 (0.86-1.16)
RR Hospital for HF 1.12 (1.00-1.25)
RR Acute pancreatitis 1.79 (1.13-2.81)
RR Pancreatitis cancer 0.55 (0.29-1.03)
RR Serious hypoglycaemia 1.14 (0.95-1.38)
RR Any hypoglycaemia 1.12 (1.05-1.20)
Gastroenterology 2011;141:150-6 ++
N Engl J Med 2013;369:1317-1326, SAVOR
N Engl J Med 2013;369:1327-1335, EXAMINE
5.5 extra cases /10.000 patients /years
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Scheen .Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:73
Efectos pleotróficos ➞ protección CV ?
iDPP4 iSGLT2
Inzucchi. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2015;12:90-100
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Scheen .Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:73
Efectos pleotróficos ➞ protección CV ?
iDPP4 iSGLT2
Inzucchi. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2015;12:90-100
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
• No hipoglucemia.
• Pancreatitits?
• C. Pancreas ?
• IC ( Saxagliptina)
• Indicación en ERC ( modificar dosis , excepto Lina )
• No hipoglucemia.
• Infección genital, hongos
• ITU
• Hipotensión / deshidratación
• Cetoacidosis euglicemica
• Fracturas (canagliflozina)
• Amptuación dedos ( canagliflozina)
• Restricción en ERC
Scheen .Expert Opinion on Drug Metab & Toxicol. 2016
DPP-4 inh. plus SGLT-2 inh. as combination therapy for T2DM:
from rationale to clinical aspects
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
• IDPP-4 No inferioridad
• Sitagliptina Tecos
• Alogliptina Examine
• Saxagliptina Savor
timi-53
• Linagliptina Carolina
• Vildagliptina
Estudios de seguridad cardiovascular
• GLP-1
• Liraglutida Leader
• Dulaglutida Award
• Exenatida Duration
• Lixisenatida Elixa
• Semaglutide Sustain
Leader cardiovascularLEADER results announced at #2016ADA – compared to placebo, Victoza reduces risk of cardiovascular death by 22%, plus a 22% reduction in kidney disease and 31% reduction in
severe hypoglycemia.
Reduccion de mortalidad
cardiovascular
22 %
Reduccion hipogluclemias
severas
31 %
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, et al. Liraglutide
and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 28 de julio
de 2016;375(4):311-22.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1603827#t=article
RCT
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, Kristensen P, Mann JFE, Nauck MA, et al.
Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of
Medicine. 28 de julio de 2016;375(4):311-22.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1603827#t=article
RCT
Mas eficaz en:
Mas jóvenes
Mas obesos
Con menor duración de la diabetes
Paciente en prevención secundaria
Sin insuficienca cardiaca
Con filtrado glomerulares entre 60 y 30
Sin diferencia de sexos
Leader cardiovascular
Efecto de los fármacos incretínicos sobre la ICC
Filion KB, Azoulay L, Platt RW, Dahl M, Dormuth CR, Clemens KK, et al. A Multicenter Observational Study of Incretin-based Drugs and Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 24 de marzo de
2016;374(12):1145-54.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1506115
Figure 2. Changes from baseline in metabolic parameters and liver enzymes according to treatment groupMean change from
baseline during treatment with liraglutide or placebo for up to 48 weeks followed by a 12 week post-treatment period are shown
(dashed line) ...
Matthew James Armstrong, Piers Gaunt, Guruprasad P Aithal, Darren Barton, Diana Hull, Richard Parker, Jonathan M
Hazlehurst, Kathy Guo, George Abouda, Mark A Aldersley, Deborah Stocken, Stephen C Gough, Jeremy W Tomlinson, Rachel
M Brown, Stefan G Hübscher, Philip N Newsome
Liraglutide safety and efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (LEAN): a multicentre, double-blind,
randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study
null, Volume 387, Issue 10019, 2016, 679–690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00803-X
Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 15 de septiembre de 2016;0(0):null
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141#t=article.
Seguridad cardiovascular de semaglutide
RRR 25%
Tamaño experimental 1648
Tamaño control 1649
Nº eventos en gr. experimental 108
Nº eventos en gr. control 146
Reducción riesgo absoluto 0.023 (2.3%)
Reducción riesgo absoluto 0.25 (25%)
OR 1.35
NNT semaglutide
Datos extraidos de : Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 15 de septiembre de 2016;0(0):null
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141#t=article.
Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 15 de septiembre de 2016;0(0):null
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1607141#t=article.
↓ 1.4% Hb A1c
↓ 4.9 Kg peso
www.thelancet.com/diabetes-endocrinology
PublishedonlineSeptember16,2016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30267-4
RCT
Duration-8 dapagliflozina y exenatide vs combinación
Los pacientes controlan mejor la Hb A1c
y pierden mas peso con la combinación
dapagliflozina/exenatide semanal ( -2% y
-3,41 Kg) que solo con dapagliflozina
(1,4% y 2,19 Kg) o exenatide (1,6% y
1,54 Kg)
SGLT2-inhibitors : metabolic effects
• Han demostrado ↓ HbA1c, peso, PA y albuminuria. Lípidos (↑Ldl-col)
• Empagliflozina ha demostrado ↓ eventos CV y sugiere beneficios
renoprotectores
• Enlentecen la progresión de la enfermedad renal diabética
independiente del efecto glucémico.
• Dapa ha demostrado en FG 30-59 mL/min; ↓ HbA1c menor , pero la
↓ Peso y PA se mantienen.
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
• DM2 (HbA1c 7.0–10.5%) + HTA mal controlada (IECA o ARA II)
• PAS 140–165 i PAD 85–105 mm Hg; CAC ≥30mg/g .
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Diab Obes and Metabol 2016; 18: 590–597.
• DM2 (HbA1c 7.0–10.5%) + HTA mal controlada (IECA o ARA II)
• PAS 140–165 i PAD 85–105mm Hg); CAC ≥30mg/g .
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Diab Obes and Metabol 2016; 18: 590–597.
Dapa ↓ −33.2%albuminuria [−45.4, −18.2].
Dapa ↓ FG −23.5% (−37.6, −6.3). Efecto que revierte al dejar el tratamiento.
No EA renales en ambos grupos.
Heerspink. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016.
Canagliflozin slows the progression of eGFR decline
in patients T2DM compared with glimepiride.
n 1.450 DM2 ;
Cana 100 mg, 300 mg, Glimepiride 6-8 mg
end point : canvi FG i ratio CAC als 2 anys.
Similar reducción HbA1c
Canvi FGe :
3.3 mL/min (2.8-3.8) SU
0.5 ml/min i 0.9 mL/min en Cana
CAC ≥ 30 :
Cana 100 mg - 31.7%, -49,3% vs.SU
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Wu. Lancet Diab Endoc 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Six regulatory submissions (37 525 participants) and 57 published trials (33 385 participants)
• SGLT2 inhibitors protected against:
Risk of major adverse CV events (MACE)
CV death, heart failure, death from any cause, non-fatal MI or angina; non-fatal stroke
Safety analyses
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on CV events, death, and major
safety outcomes in adults with T2DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wu. Lancet Diab Endoc 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on CV events, death, and major
safety outcomes in adults with T2DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wu. Lancet Diab Endoc 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
Effect of EMPA on bone fractures in patients with T2DM
Los DM tienen mayor riesgo de fracturas vs. no DM
• End points:fracturas (AE), marcadores óseos (FA, proteinas totales, albumina, PTH, 25-OH-Vit. D
,calcio y fosfato. Relación sexo,edad ,FG,densidad ósea (DXA)
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Effect of EMPA on bone fractures in patients with T2DM
15 AC Phase I-III (con EMPA-REG) > 12.000 DM2
• % de fracturas comparables Empa vs. placebo (edad, género y FGe
• % de fracturas aumenta con la edad ( ↑mujeres y IR moderada).
EMPA-REG H2H-SU
• Empa no incrementa riesgo de fracturas vs. glimepiride 1-4 mg.
• Densidad ósea (fémur y col. lumbar) normal.
III Jornadas GdT Diabetes de la semFYC
Figure 2
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2015 3, 638-652DOI: (10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00097-2) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions
Evolución de las insulinas en el tiempo
Date of download: 10/30/2016Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association.
All rights reserved.
From: Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in
Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 DiabetesThe DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA. 2016;315(9):898-907. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1252
Date of download: 10/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association.
All rights reserved.
From: Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in
Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes The DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA. 2016;315(9):898-907. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1252
Conclusions and Relevance
Among patients with uncontrolled
type 2 diabetes taking glargine
and metformin, treatment with
degludec/liraglutide compared with
up-titration of glargine resulted in
noninferior HbA1c levels, with
secondary analyses indicating
greater HbA1c level reduction after
26 weeks of treatment. Further
studies are needed to assess
longer-term efficacy and safety.
Date of download: 10/30/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association.
All rights reserved.
From: Effect of Insulin Glargine Up-titration vs Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide on Glycated Hemoglobin Levels in
Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes The DUAL V Randomized Clinical Trial
JAMA. 2016;315(9):898-907. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1252
Dosis:
Deglira 41 (16-50)
40% dosis máxima de
50 U
Glargina 66 (17-153
http://wa2jp9pc9c.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-
8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects+on+
All-
cause+Mortality+and+Cardiovascular+Outcomes+in+Patients+With+Type+2+Diabetes+by+Comparing+Insulin+With+Oral+Hypoglycemic+Agent+Therapy
%3A+A+Meta-
analysis+of+Randomized+Controlled+Trials&rft.jtitle=Clinical+Therapeutics&rft.au=Li%2C+Juan&rft.au=Tong%2C+Yuzhen&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yuwei&rft.a
u=Tang%2C+Lizhi&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-
114X&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=386.e6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.clinthera.2015.12.006&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externa
lDocID=10_1016_j_clinthera_2015_12_006¶mdict=en-US
Figure 6. Risk of stroke events. CVD = cardiovascular disease; M.H. = Mantel-Haenszel; OHA = oral hypoglycemic agent; UKPDS =
UK Prospective Diabetes Study.Juan Li, Yuzhen Tong, Yuwei Zhang, Lizhi Tang, Qingguo LV, Fang Zhang, Ruijie Hu, Nanwei Tong
Effects on All-cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Comparing Insulin With
Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Therapy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Clinical Therapeutics, Volume 38, Issue 2, 2016, 372–386.e6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.12.006
La insulinización no mejora el pronóstico de ADNis
NMA findings for Gla-300 versus other basal insulins in the BOT population: (A) change in
HbA1c (%); (B) change in body weight (kg); (C) risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia; (D) risk of
documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia.
Nick Freemantle et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009421
©2016 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group
A. Change in HbA1c (%)
B. Change in body weight (kg)
Nick Freemantle et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e009421©2016 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group
C. Risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia
D. risk of documented symptomatic
hypoglycaemia
NMA findings for Gla-300 versus other basal insulins in the BOT population: (A) change in
HbA1c (%); (B) change in body weight (kg); (C) risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia; (D) risk of
documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia.
A: Mean plasma glucose concentrations over time during the course of the
study (INP (infusion i.v): –◇–; INI (40 U nasal): –■–).
Satya Dash et al. Diabetes 2015;64:766-774©2015 by American Diabetes Association
Insulinas nasal mas potentes
Liu L, Zhou C, Xia X, Liu Y. Self-assembled lecithin/chitosan nanoparticles for oral insulin delivery: preparation and functional evaluation. Int J Nanomedicine. 24 de febrero de 2016;11:761-9.
Reducción de glucosa con diferentes dosis de
insulina y administración oral (lecitina/citosan) o
subcutánea
60 U/kg oral 2 U/kg sc 40 U/kg L/C 60 U/k L/c
Kim ES, Plosker GL. AFREZZA® (insulin human) Inhalation Powder: A Review in Diabetes Mellitus. Drugs. 18 de septiembre de 2015;75(14):1679-86.
Afrezza insulina inhalada
SUSPENDIDA
Prevalence of prescribing of different anti-diabetic medications as add-on therapy in patients
with type 2 diabetes on sulfonylureas. *Other=Sum of prevalence of Acarbose, GLP-1 analogues,
Meglitinides and SGLT-2 inhibitors. **For detailed figures on point estimates and CIs, please
consult online supplementary appendix 6.
Manuj Sharma et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010210
©2016 by British Medical Journal Publishing Group