NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of...

7
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM KCC CONTROL NUMBER IG-10435-04 ACTION SUBJECT EXREG SUSPENSE KCC SUSPENSE (U/ Quarterly Report to the Intelligence Over- I!] SI GNATURE sig ht Board on NSA Activities- Fourth Quarter FY04 D INFORMATION ELEMENT SUSPENSE DISTRIBUTION SUMMARY PURPOSE : (U/fFOUO) To forward to t he Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) of the President' s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, via the As si s tant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Overs ight (ATSD(IO)), NSA's quarter ly report on its intelligence activities. BACKGROUND: Executi ve Order 12333 and Executive Order 12863 require Intelligence Community agency heads and Intelligence Community General Coun sels and In s pector s General , respectively, to report to the JOB on a quarterly ba s is concerning intelligence activities that they have reason to believe may be unlawful or contrary to Executive Order or Pres idential Directive. The enclosed memorandum cover s all reportable activities known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 Augu st 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting s eparately any additional reportable activities known to them, unl ess the President has specifically ins tructed that the Board is not to be informed. The Di rector' s s ignature signifies that no other activities that r equ ire reporting are known to him. RECOMMENDATION: (U) Director sign the enclosed memora \'(b .). (3) -P .L. 86-36 decla ssified and ·marked upon\ remo'v . al of enclosure(s }.. · ..... .. ................ \ .. \ .. \\ NAMS)"'...£ DATE GC Robert L. " ' I AGC(O) !, .. ......... :;, IG J oel 1' : Hrennet .. -/ \ D/I G ·, ......... AIG(IOJ ......... l'"\ Ri r":.I N 4.f.nR . \ ....... FORM A5796 FEB 94 . NSN: 7540-FM-001-5465 ·· .... ·· .. SECURE .. OFF.ICE PHONE ···· ... " 5548s _ _,Poj_ · .... J la121s 35 44 s I 3544s 3544 ORG. Dll DERIVED FROM NSAICSSM 123-2 DATED: 24 Febr uary 1998 DECLASSI FY ON XI NAME ANO DATE SECURE PHON E I \ \\ \ _,:;:!; '1CJ -3 . .;;01 zi pproved for Release by NSA on 12-19-2014, FOIA Case# 70809 Liti nation) PHONE (Secure) DATE PREPARED 963-2984 09 Nove mber 2004 SECURITY CLASSIFICATI ON ' ·-- . .. __ - - ·--

Transcript of NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of...

Page 1: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM KCC CONTROL NUMBER

IG-10435-04 ACTION

-==--c==~~lfH-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [J APPROVAL SUBJECT

EXREG SUSPENSE

KCC SUSPENSE

(U/ Quarterly Report to the Intelligence Over- I!] SIGNATURE

sight Board on NSA Activities- Fourth Quarter FY04 D INFORMATION ELEMENT SUSPENSE

DISTRIBUTION

SUMMARY

PURPOSE: (U/fFOUO) To forward to the Intelligence Oversight Board (IOB) of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, via the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight (ATSD(IO)), NSA's quarterly report on its intelligence activities.

BACKGROUND: (U/fPOUO~ Executive Order 12333 and Executive Order 12863 require Intelligence Community agency heads and Intelligence Community General Counsels and Inspectors General, respectively, to report to the JOB on a quarterly basis concerning intelligence activities that they have reason to believe may be unlawful or contrary to Executive Order or Presidential Directive. The enclosed memorandum covers all reportable activities known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional reportable activities known to them, unless the President has specifically instructed that the Board is not to be informed. The Director's signature signifies that no other activities that require reporting are known to h im.

RECOMMENDATION: (U) Director sign the enclosed memora

\'(b .). (3) -P . L . 86-36

Thil~~::nt n:~y ~ declassified and· marked "UNCLAS.SIFIED/'~~~~~rl71'Tt't"'--1 upon\remo'v.al of enclosure(s}"· .. · ..... ..

~ ................

\ .. \ ..

OFFIC~ ~\ \\NAMS)"'...£ DATE

GC Robert L. '~-,,,,_ " ,, ,,.~/ ' I

AGC(O) !, .. ......... :;,

IG ~- J oel 1': Hrennet .. -/ ~:. \ H~\

D/IG ·,

.........

AIG(IOJ .........

l'"\R ir":.IN 4.f.nR . \ .......

FORM A5796 FEB 94 . NSN: 7540-FM-001-5465

·· .... ·· ..

COORDINATiONt~PPROVAL SECURE .. OFF.ICE PHONE ···· ...

" 5548s _ _,Poj_· ....

J la121s 3544s

I 3544s

3544

ORG.

Dll

DERIVED FROM NSAICSSM 123-2 DATED: 24 February 1998 DECLASSI FY ON XI

NAME ANO DATE SECURE PHONE

I \

\\ \ _,:;:!; '1CJ -3 . .;;01

zi pproved for Release by NSA on 12-19-2014, FOIA Case# 70809 Liti nation)

PHONE (Secure) DATE PREPARED

963-2984 09 November 2004

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

' ·--... __ ·~ - - - ·--

Page 2: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

... DOC~D.: 4165188

I OP SECRE I flCOMINU/NOFORN77X1

1. (U) INSPECTOR GENERAL ACTIVITIES

a. (C,'fSI) During this quarter, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviewed various intelligence activities of the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSA/CSS) to determine whether they were conducted in accordance with applicable statutes, Executive Orders (EO), Attorney General procedures, and Department of Defense (DoD) and internal directives. With few exceptions, the issues presented were routine and indicated that the operating elements understand the restrictions on NSA/CSS activities. t- .

I t tp__,¥ V" i ( i '" j'I'. YI" ' )\, <,. I). b.~e OIG conducted a review of NSA's management of electronic U u

surveillance activities carried out under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978. In general terms, the reviev;,.· found t.!::;J.~ ~~iv.5C: ..:.c:i·v·i~ic.s ~11.::;ure that the rights of U.S. persons are protected; however, the Agency's management of the internal FISA process is not completely effective and efficient. The process sometimes takes longer than necessary when time is of the essence and engenders confusion that has, on occasion, led to missed opportunities for timely collection. The OIG recommended improvements in the written ~ig_~p.sg that defines authorities and assigns roles and responsibilities, step-by-step instr~ftion,s to guide FISA process participants, the need for tailored training on FISA operational aspects, and meaningful metric_§_ to gauge the efficiency of the process. NSA management has agreed to implement all recommendations.

c. (U/IFOUO) The NSA OIG, with

.. A prog.rf afo Ls-.--re-n----,....-----.-.--..,.....j-----,,,....a __ .. "T .. _a_n_e_m--r--e..,.....e--.--r-eq_u_1_r_e_m_e_n.....-s_m __ a_n_a--ge_.r_Jw~o asse~skd

IO implications of all E 12333..::relate_d tasking. Employee knowledge levels wdre satisfactory and there were no violatioris"·of-ap.p,licable laws, executive ord~r, , regulations, or policies noted, but the inspectors .. iden.tified weaknesses in p~ogr~hi management documentation and training and reporting ... compJ~ance method~. ijhe NSA OIG has tasked! l ·to--develOP..?..r.1..~ document stanci'ard .. op~rating ........ , ff procedures for the IO program and to report IO' .. activities .. quarler.ly . ..tQJfie .. NS.AfOIG. The NSA OIG will track the action through completion. .. ........... ::::::::'.>'\.b) (3)-P. L . 86-36

\\.

d. (G/ffi13L) Along with ins ectors from leted

the joint inspection o ,., The inspection report noted that the site's intelligence oversight program man~ger

V-~ is visible and is actively involved in training and operations. Comprehension,.-Of 'X ,.J.. ~ initial and refresher IO training is measured through web-based testing. Tyio ~~~ ~f' \veaknesses of the program were the lack of an implementing instruction _4etailing .YJ ........ -JO .. roles.,r~-~P.?..1.1..~.i_?.~.lities and program m_anagement procedures, and th7Aack of a V complete hst of raw'traffie .. datab.a.$~ ... ~.l:1:?.:1tors. The NSA OIG tasked t_p;~.j I

........................................................... . .......... ··''.·.-:::·~ ..... ···························· _:

TOP SECRET/lCOMINTJ/NOFORN//X1 ( b ) (1) (b ) (3) - P .L. 86- 36 (b ) (3) - 50 USC 3024 (i)

Page 3: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

lb> H'"' (b'r.:MY-~ -~.~ ~ n-1J. 65188 --. (b) (3.) ___ -____ s·· ... o usc 302 4 ( i ) =f0P SE6RE=f"60MIN=F"N0F0RN'~~ 11v1111

·· ..... I Ito prepare an operating instruction to detail the IO roles, responsibilities and procedures for the workforce, to designate and publish a list of primary and secondary auditors to review interactive raw traffic databases, and to ensure that the auditors receive appropriate training in database audits. The NSA OIG will track the action through completion.

2. (U) GENERAL COUNSEL ACTIVITIES

l:075IY.rhe NSA Office of General Counsel (OGC) reviewed various intelligence activities of the NSA/CSS to detennine whether they were conducted in accordance with applicable statutes, EO, Attorney General (AG) procedures, and DoD and internal directives. The OGC advised Agency elements on a number of questions, including the collection and dissemination of communications of or concerning U.S. persons (USP); the reporting of possible violations of federal criminal law contained in SIG INT product; the testing of electronic equipment; and the applicability of the FISA. With few exceptions, the issues presented were routine and indicated that the operating elements understand the restrictions on NSA/CSS activities. The OGC did not file any reports with the Intelligence Oversight Board during this quarter.

3. (U) SIGINT ACTIVITIES

a. ESJ/SI} Collection Against U.S. Persons ....... f; (b) (1)

./ \(b) (3)-P. L .

(:~ ~~;;:;::n:3;his quarter, the Deputy Director of the Na~i6~:; s~J,urity Agency (D/DIRNSA) granted approval for consensual collection ag5l'i:Ilst []u\s. persons. D/DIRNSA-approved consensual collection against OJ.S. persons rvas routinely terminated this quarter. \

b. (8ff01) The AG granted authority to collect the communications oQU.S. persons during this quarter_

(2) (U) Unintentional

a. (~J.~I) i'\s mentioned in our 13 September 2004 re ort several communications were inadvertently collected from aL----r----M......J Upon further investigation, the cause of the error was isolated to a ahd it was corrected to restore the integrity of collection.

b. (8//Sf/~fF) This quarter, unintentional retrievals using the • , .__ _____________________ __,raw traffic filEJ.S resulted in

(b)(3)-P . L . 86-36 2 . ( b ) ( 1)

(b ) (3) - P . L . 86- 36 (b ) (3) -18 USC 798

86-36

TOP SECAETHCOMINT/JNOFOANf/X1 (b ) (3) - 50 USC 3024 (i)

Page 4: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

. ... DOGID: 4165188 _,..-.

TOP SEGAET/JCOMINTflNOFOAN//X1

two incidents against U.S. persons overseas. Both incidents were reported to responsible oversight officials and corrective actions were taken. All unauthorized traffic collected has been destroyed.

b. (Uf/FOUO) Dissemination of U.S. Identities .· (b) ( 1)

( b) ( 3) - P. L . 8 6-3 6

(1 ) (U) Intentional

(S/1'8!) In acco,rdancEf w!th section 7 ofUSSID 18, U.S. identities were disseminated I ~ime_s. during this quarter. The following table shows the justification and the number of instances of dissemination: In the "Unmasked by Analyst" column, the U.S. identity was revealed in a serialized end product; in the "Unmasked at User Request" column, a U.S. identity was released to a user at the user's request.

JUSTIFICATION · Unmask ed Unmasked at

TOTAL bv Analvst User Request - - . I

7.2.c Necessary

7.2.c.l Foreign Official

7.2.c.3 International Narcotics

7.2.c.4 Criminal Activity

7.2.c.7 U.S. Government Of fidal

TOTAL

(2) (U) Unintentional ... ·7 ( b ) ( 1)

/f (b ) (3) - P . L . 86- 36

a. (Sf;'SI) Durj,Jl.g. thistfuarl~;· th~-·~~-~als Intelligence Directorate ,(SID) cancelleciOIGINT products because they contained the identities.ofU$. persons, organizations, or entities; those products that contained informatii:m derived from communications of U.S. persons were not reissued. _............... / ·

b. t'f'Slf9ll I released a t.~-f~l oO reports containing t.he .. identities of U.S. persons or based on the communications of persons later ~gent'ffi.ed as U.S. persons. In all instancesJ l6ancelled the reports, -...~4ic·h were either not reissued or were reissued with the proper minimization .

... ····· (b) ( 1) (b)(3)-P . L . 86-36 (b) (3) -50 USC 3024 ( i )

3 TOP SECRET/JCOMINT/JNOFORNllX1

Page 5: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

.,DOC:t D : 4 1 65 1 88

TOP SECflETffCOMINTffNOFORNftx 1

(3) (U) Raw Traffic Dissemination Outside the SIGINT Production • . ...... l !:?l ( ll

Cham · ....... (b -1--P> - P . L . 86- 36

......... \ ... ....... :~· ...... . ......... ·

··········· ...

........

"The SID ensures that the ".. ,__p-er_s_o_n_n_e.....-a -re.....,...r-a .... 1n- e--.---y""'l"'T"-e...,....,,....,.. .... o-n ........ ,.,...., ..... s......,..e-g-a...,.....r-es....,.rictions an d on proper "..

h andling and dissemination of SIGINT data I ] Personnel workin!! in or with SID durinE? this auarter included reor esentatives of

l b.l(3) - P . 86- 36 ..... ·· .....

·· ..... ·· .....

· ....

...... ·j((..!Jl (ll 4. (U) Other Activities ... ········..-?!! \ bl (3)-P . L . 86-36

.. · /)''j/ t 6\ . (3l-18 USC 798 ,.// /j (bl "(3) -50 USC 3024 (il

~~;:;:i::~::~::nts 6ft;anscripts,6~~:~~i \ '\ communication fro _../ ,./ / '(see o¥r report dated 9 June 2004) h.as cone u e . oug t e ··ntercE1pt of the \ communication was destroyed as required, the c:.orresponding transcripts were retained improperly. The reason for the non-~ompliance w~ a misunderstanding by the analyst who believed that the transcri'~ts were not cbmmunicatiohs as defined in USSID 18. I

l, All \ //. -------------------------------------------------------' transcr ipts were deleted from the .. database. SID provicfed trainin on\ USSID<J.:'8 and FISA rocedures to the -"taff. A review o ' ·, . /~/

is scheduled for tl,iis..;,fi~cal ------------------------------------------ \ /' year. ,.., ... \~·bl ( ll

..... ·:::.:>" (B-,l (3l-P . L .

:~:~ :::::::: :u~:r~:~:·:;::~:ponded .\ol· ····· ···1re·u::: for technic~\\ assistance from law enforcement, includiI.l -·re" uests fro ..._ -... ...

4

TOP SECRETh'COMINT/JNOFORNl/X1

86-36

Page 6: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

.. . DOC.ID : 4165188 .--.

TOP SECRET/ICOMINT/fNOFORN//X1

c. (U) Working Aids ·

(U//FOUO) The SID Office of Oversight and Compliance maintains "U.S. Identities in SIGINT11 and a matrix of blanket reporting waivers on its web page for use by the NSA/CSS Enterprise. The E.O., NSA/CSS Policy Number 1-23, DoD Regulation 5240.1-R, and USSID 18 are also available on-line.

5 TOP SECAET/ICOMINT/INOFOAN//X1

Page 7: NSA STAFF PROCESSING FORM · known to the Inspector General and General Counsel. Per PIOB letter of 6 August 1982, Agency heads are responsible for reporting separately any additional

-. QOC:~ID.: 4165188 ,,,. . SECBE'IWCOMfNT/1NOFO'.R- .I

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000

29 November 2004

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN, INTELLIGENCE OVERSIGHT BOARD

THRU: Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Intelligence Oversight)

SUBJECT: (U//POUO) Report to the Intelligence Oversight Board on NSA Activities - INFORMATION MEMORANDUM

(U//FOUO) Except as previously reported to you or the President, or otherwise stated in the enclosure, we have no reason to believe that any intelligence activities of the National Security Agency during the quarter ending 30 September 2004 were unlawful or contrary to Executive Order or Presidential Directive, and thus required to be reported pursuant to Section 1.7.(d) of Executive Order 12333.

(U//FOUO) The Inspector General and the General Counsel continue to exercise oversight of Agency activities by means of inspections, surveys, training, review of directives and guidelines, and advice and counsel. These activities and other data requested by the Board or members of the staff of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense (Intelli e Oversigh~ are described in the enclosure.

!

{U//EQUOrl concur in the report of the Inspector General and the General Counsel and hereby make it our combined report.

Encl: Quarterly Report

~v.J __ '-MICHAELV.~

Lieutenant General, USAF Director, NSA/Chief, CSS

This Document May Be Declassified and Marked "'UNCLASSJFIEO//F0R 0FFICIAL l::!SE 0~4L'i'" upon removal of enclosure(s).

DERIVED FROM: NSAJCSSM 123-2 Dated: 24 February 1998 Declassify on: XI

'fOP SBCRB'fW€0MEN'f/INOPORN//Xl