(n)QPS

34
(n)QPS LHC status LHC: past, present and future Mike Lamont for the LHC team 1 21-3-2011

description

(n)QPS. LHC: past, present and future. Mike Lamont for the LHC team. 2010 – main aims. Clear priority to lay the foundations for 2011 and the delivery of 1 fb -1 . Peak luminosity target 1x10 32 cm -2 s -1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of (n)QPS

Page 1: (n)QPS

(n)QPS

LHC status

LHC: past, present and futureMike Lamontfor the LHC team

121-3-2011

Page 2: (n)QPS

Clear priority to lay the foundations for 2011 and the delivery of 1 fb-1. Peak luminosity target 1x1032 cm-2s-1

Gain solid operational experience of injecting, ramping, squeezing and establishing stable beams

Steady running at or around 1 MJ for an extended period

Perform a safe, phased increase in intensity with validation and a running period at each step

2010 – main aims

LHC status 221-3-2011

Page 3: (n)QPS

Luminosity: 3 running periods

3

Bunch trains

Nominal bunch commissioning

Initial luminosity

run

Nominal bunch

operation(up to 48)

Performance ramp-up

(368 bunches)

Perform

ance

ramp-u

p mad

e pos

sible

by a

safe,

stag

ed co

mmission

ing.

Meticu

lous p

repara

tion f

or un

safe

beam

s!

21-3-2011 LHC status

Page 4: (n)QPS

2010 parameters

LHC status

2010 Nominal

Energy [TeV] 3.5 7

beta* [m] 3.5, 3.5, 3.5, 3.5 m 0.55, 10, 0.55, 10

Emittance [microns] 2.0 – 3.5 start of fill 3.75

Transverse beam size at IP [microns] around 60 16.7

Bunch current 1.2e11 1.15e11

Number of bunches 368348 collisions/IP 2808

Stored energy [MJ] 28 360

Peak luminosity[cm-2s-1] 2e32 1e34

421-3-2011

Page 5: (n)QPS

Overall LHC efficiency in 2010

5

W. Venturini

65%availability!

Great a

chiev

emen

t for th

e firs

t

year

of op

eratio

n!

21-3-2011 LHC status

Page 6: (n)QPS

Physics operations

~30%Stable beams!

W. Venturini

21-3-2011 LHC status 6

Page 7: (n)QPS

2010 - records

Peak stable luminosity delivered 2.07 x 1032 cm-2s-1

Maximum luminosity delivered in one fill 6.3 pb-1

Maximum luminosity delivered in one day 5.98 pb-1

Maximum luminosity delivered in 7 days 24.6 pb-1

Maximum colliding bunches 348Maximum average events per bunch crossing

3.78

Longest time in Stable Beams for one fill 30.3 hoursLongest time in Stable Beams for one day 22.8 hours (94.9%)Longest time in Stable Beams for 7 days 69.9 hours (41.6%)Fastest turnaround to Stable Beams 3.66 hours (protons)

Courtesy AtlasLHC status 721-3-2011

Page 8: (n)QPS

Status LHC Stored Energy

80 kg TNT

Stored energy reached at 3.5 TeV: 28.0 MJ

8LHC status Ralph Assmann21-3-2011

Page 9: (n)QPS

Ions

LHC status

Protonsagain

50 & 75 ns

921-3-2011

Page 10: (n)QPS

Excellent single beam before collisions ~200 - 300 hours

Luminosity lifetime ~15 - 20 hours Reasonably well given by emittance growth and intensity decay Minimal drifts in overlap – beams very stable

Intensity lifetime ~90 hours Luminosity burn, losses on collimators

Emittance growth (hor. ~ 30 hours, vert. ~ 20 to 40 hours) Intra Beam Scattering and something else – at least sometimes “the hump”

Lifetimes

1021-3-2011 LHC status

Page 11: (n)QPS

Aperture

LHC status 1121-3-2011

Page 12: (n)QPS

Optics & magnetic machine Optics stunningly stable

Machine magnetically and optically well understood Excellent agreement with model and machine

Magnetically reproducible Important because set-up remains valid from fill to fill

LHC status 1221-3-2011

Page 13: (n)QPS

Measured Cleaning at 3.5 TeV

IR8IR1

IR2

IR5

Mom

entu

m

Cle

anin

g

Dum

p P

rote

ctio

n C

ol.

(beam1, vertical beam loss, intermediate settings)

LHC status

Making sure the hierarchy is respected

1321-3-2011

Page 14: (n)QPS

Excellent single beam lifetime Ramp & squeeze essentially without loss

No quenches with beam above 450 GeV Excellent performance of Machine Protection

Optics close to model (and correctable) Excellent reproducibility Aperture as expected Better than nominal from injectors

Emittances, bunch intensity Beam-beam: can collide nominal bunch currents

With smaller that nominal emittances

LHC 2010 - summary

14

And surprisingly good availability… 21-3-2011 LHC status

Page 15: (n)QPS

PROBLEMS – TWO OF THEM

LHC status 1521-3-2011

Page 16: (n)QPS

Many sudden local losses have been recorded. No quench, but preventive dumps Rise time around of the order 1 ms. Potential explanation: dust particles falling into beam

creating scatter losses and showers propagating downstream

Distributed around the ring – arcs, inner triplets, IRs

UFOs – unidentified falling objects

LHC status 1621-3-2011

Page 17: (n)QPS

● Revision of thresholds on superconducting magnets could make the UFO effects acceptable

● More detailed analysis needed to understand discrepancies with current simulations + additional quench tests to benchmark

UFOs – a possible solution?

● More events at higher intensities● Only 1? event observed at 450GeV● Signal shortens, i.e. the losses are faster with intensity● Signal amplitude does not increase with intensity

B.Dehning, E. Holzer, A.Nordt, M.Sapinski 21-3-2011 LHC status 17

Page 18: (n)QPS

Electron cloud

LHC status

Schematic of electron cloud build up in LHC arc beam pipe due to photoemission and secondary emission [F. Ruggiero] Reflection

Secondary emission yield [SEY]

18

Very much dependent on bunch spacing: - 150 ns. – local signs in common beam pipe- 75 ns. – some first signs- 50 ns. – vacuum valves in

21-3-2011

Page 19: (n)QPS

Vacuum pressure rise (background in experiments) Single-bunch instability Multi-bunch instability Incoherent emittance growth Heat load in cold arcs (quenches in the limit) Perturbation of beam diagnostics

Electron cloud effects

LHC status

Electron cloud effects occur both in the warm and cold regions.

19

Well understood, very well studied (other machines, simulations…)

21-3-2011

Page 20: (n)QPS

Vacuum activity started off in regions with common beam pipe at 450 GeV as we pushed up the number of bunches with 150 ns spacing Test solenoids cured problem – electron cloud

Tried 50 ns bunch spacing Things really kicked off High vacuum activity in warm regions (single beam pipe) Significant heat load in cold regions Instabilities and beam size growth observed Surface conditioning (‘scrubbing’) observed

Gas desorption rates and SEY drop Time constant < 1 day

Situation a lot cleaner with 75 ns incoherent effects seen – emittance blow-up 800+ bunches injected into both beams

Experience in 2010

LHC status 2021-3-2011

Page 21: (n)QPS

2010 observations are certainly due to ~ 2 < SEY < 2.5, whereas 1.7 was usually the max value studied in the past

Expect to be able to reach 200-300 b with 75 ns without scrubbing

Scrubbing with large emittance (>3.5 mm), high intensity (>1.2e11), 4x36b of 50 ns beam

Time 2-3 days needed to setup 50 ns at injection 7 days of scrubbing 1 day for validation and scrubbing result evaluation

Lots of wire wrapped around warm bits during the technical stop (solenoids)

Scrubbing strategy for 2011

21LHC status21-3-2011

Page 22: (n)QPS

Solenoids between DFBX and D1 in IR1R

LHC status 2221-3-2011

Page 23: (n)QPS

2011

LHC status 23

Energy – stick at 3.5 TeV – we still worry about the splices

21-3-2011

Page 24: (n)QPS

Motivation is clear!

1 fb-1 delivered to each of IP1, IP5 and IP8 at 3.5 TeV Can probably do better for IP1 and IP5

It will be a challenge to deliver 1 fb-1 to IP8 Maximum luminosity : from 2e32 to 3e32 cm-2 s-1

Luminosity leveling via separation required to get close Alice

pp run: 5e29 < L < 5e30 cm-2 s-1, µ < 0.05

2011: main goals

2421-3-2011 LHC status

fast, secure and far-reaching

Decided on beta* = 1.5 m in Atlas, CMS; 3 m in LHCb; 10 m in Alice

Page 25: (n)QPS

Beam commissioning: 3 weeks Exit - stable beams with low number of bunches

Ramp-up to ~200 bunches (75 ns): 2 weeks Multi-bunch injection commissioning continued Stable beams

Technical Stop: 4+1 days Scrubbing run: 10 days including 50 ns injection comm. [Intermediate energy run – 5 days] Resume 75 ns operation and increase no. bunches: 3

weeks 300 – 400 – 600 – 800 – 930 - MPS and OP qualification

Physics operation 75 ns: ~930 bunches (50 ns. remains an option if things look good)

Baseline scenario

2521-3-2011 LHC status

Page 26: (n)QPS

2011 LHC schedule Q1/Q2

26LHC status21-3-2011

Page 27: (n)QPS

2011 Q3/Q4

LHC status 2721-3-2011

Page 28: (n)QPS

Estimated Peak and Integrated Luminosity

LHC status 2821-3-2011

Energy 3.5 TeVBeta* 1.5 mBunch spacing 75 nsBunch intensity 1.2 x 1011

Stored beam energy 75 MJDays at peak luminosity 135Hübner factor 0.2

Emittance[mm.mrad]

Beam-beam parameter

Peak Luminosity

[cm-2 s-1]

Integrated Luminosity

[fb-1]

2.5 0.006 1.3 x 1033 ~2.72.0 0.007 1.6 x 1033 ~3.3

Page 29: (n)QPS

2011 – progress so far

LHC status 29

19th February First beam, circulating beams established.

3rd March First collisions at 3.5 TeV, beta*=1.5 m. with pilot beams

5th March Nominal bunches at 3.5 TeV, start collimator set-up, injection and beam dump set-up & validation

13th March First stable beams, 3 bunches per beam, initial luminosity 1.6e30 cm-2s-1

18th March 32 bunches per beam, initial luminosity ~3e31 cm-2s-1

19th March 64 bunches per beam, initial luminosity ~6e31 cm-2s-1

20th March 75ns_136b+4small_138_102_105_24bpi11inj 1.45e32 cm-2s-1

Impressive re-commissioning, improvements across the board.

Operation cycle now well optimized: faster ramp & squeeze, much fewer manual actions required by shift crews

21-3-2011

Page 30: (n)QPS

LHC status 3021-3-2011

Page 31: (n)QPS

Machine still beautiful

LHC status 3121-3-2011

Page 32: (n)QPS

Injection, ramp and squeeze fully operational LHC magnetic model & optics excellent Beam instrumentation in good shape. Beam cleaning and collimation works reliably

with predicted efficiency. Machine protection excellent performance Machine aperture looks good Performance with beam (losses, lifetimes,

luminosity, emittance growth etc.) is very encouraging

Conclusions 1/2

LHC status 32

We have a beautiful machine on our hands!21-3-2011

Page 33: (n)QPS

Machine availability is excellent – the hard work of numerous teams

There are problems UFOs somewhat worrying Electron cloud well understood – measures prepared

2011 – another long year ahead… 75 ns. bunch spacing – up to 930 bunches Nominal intensities, beta* 1.5 m in Atlas and CMS Should be good for 5 to 10 x 1032 cm-2s-1 and 1 to 3 fb-1

Progress so far is good…

Will run in 2012 Attempt to measure splice resistance in 2011/2012 might open

the way to 4 TeV or higher

Conclusions 2/2

LHC status 3321-3-2011

Page 34: (n)QPS

LHC status 3421-3-2011