NQES Keynote speaker: Muavia Gallie
-
Upload
education-moving-up-cc -
Category
Education
-
view
128 -
download
6
description
Transcript of NQES Keynote speaker: Muavia Gallie
1
Critical analysis of the appropriateness ofthe ACE School Leadership programme forthe training and development of practicing
principals in South Africa
Presenter: Muavia Gallie
President of EMASA
@
National Quality Education Summit
Gallagher Convention Centre
25 February 2010, 08h40 - 09h30
Introduction
Leadership is adecision, not aposition or set
of skills.
2
Quality isan
Attitude.
Origin of the ACE
3
Core activities
Key Functions
4
South African version 1
South African version 2
5
Different Modules on Offer
12. Basiccomputer literacyfor schoolmanagement
11. Demonstrateeffective languageskills in schoolmanagement andleadership
10. Develop aportfolio todemonstrate schoolmanagement andleadershipcompetencies
9. Moderateassessment
8. Conductoutcomes-basedassessment
7. Mentor schoolmanagers andmanagementoringprogrammes inschools
6. Lead and managesubject/ learningareas/ phase
5. Manage policy,planning, schooldevelopment andgovernance
4. Manageorganisationalsystems, physicaland financialresources
3. Lead andmanage people
2. ManagingTeaching andLearning
1. Understandingschool leadershipand managementin South Africa
Importance of the Module
12. Basic computerliteracy for schoolmanagement
11. Demonstrate effectivelanguage skills in schoolmanagement and leadership
10. Develop a portfolio todemonstrate schoolmanagement and leadershipcompetencies
9. Moderate assessment8. Conductoutcomes-basedassessment
7. Mentor schoolmanagers and managementoring programmes inschools
6. Lead and managesubject/ learningareas/ phase
5. Manage policy,planning, schooldevelopment andgovernance
4. Manageorganisationalsystems, physical andfinancial resources
3. Lead andmanagepeople
1. Understandingschool leadershipand management inSouth Africa
2. ManagingTeaching
and Learning
6
Having a System to knowWhat is going on!
Helicopter view of educationallife
“Helicopter view” of Educational Life
SchoolStrategy
•Vision•Goals
Education Ministry
TeachersPurpose
LearnersPhysical
TechnologyCompetitors
Unions
NGOs andCivilsocietystructures
Economy
Way of living‘Religions’
Regional andinternationalorganisations
Globalisation
Government
Politicalparties
Customers
Empower-ment
Relation-ships
Flexibility Openness
Recognition
MotivationCulture•Values•Work ethics•Commit- ment
Systems•Finance•Information•Communication
Structure•People•Capacity•Power
Mental Emotional
Spiritual
7
Success rate = 8,1%
•Success-rate of the system = 8,1%•Of every 12 learners starting GradeOne, only 1 learner attains what thesystem is promising them - data 2005!
Dysfunctionality vis-à-vis Under-performanceFigure 10: Three levels of school functionality in relation to the support needed by
schools
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% -10% -20%
Non-Functioning -20% – +20%
Low-Functioning 21% - 60%
High-Functioning 61% - 100%
Basics
Gallie 2006
8
Two types of policies in Education
Ch.8p.169
Learner Enrolment
HSRC 2006, p.27
9
Different Perspectives
Understanding the situation well
Conditions required to implement
10
External and internal differences
Different foci
Foci 1 2 3 4 A. Capability (B+D+K) A1 - Self
• .. • .. • .. • . .
A2 - Team A3 -
Organisation A4 - Global
Context
WH
O?
B. Characteristics
(Believing – Attitudes and
values)
B1
B2
B3
B4
C. Competency (Doing -
Skills) - What you are/have
done in a particular
situation.
C1
C2
C3
C4
WH
AT?
D. Content (Knowing –
Content neede d )
D1
D2
D3
D4
11
Other foci
Organisation processes Input Process Output Impact
Developmental stages Beginners
(pre-service) Freshmen Consolidating
Junior Excelling
Senior
Performance levels Dys-functional Low-
functional Average-
functional High
functional
Domains Rules &
regulations Relation-
ships Systems
Leadership level s Administration Management Leadership
There is nomanagement
withoutmonitoring
and evaluation
12
Monitor
Evaluate
13
Iceberg diagram
Adult Learning --
FactsInformation
Asso
ciat
ion Feelings
14
Motivational Learning
Why do people not sharewhat they know?
Causes Cultural Reward
Knowledge hoarding is considered a source of job security
Fear of not getting credit and suspicion
Loss of ownership of expertise
Fear of making mistakes
Lack of comprehension of value of possessed knowledge
Lack of time to share insights, knowledge, “war stories” andexperiences
Lack of knowledge sharing mechanisms
Unwillingness to use existing technology to share knowledge
15
Quest for Success
Contact details:• E-mail: [email protected];
• Fax: 0866720520
• Powerpoint website: www.slideshare.net
Thank You!