div class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=1Page 1button div class=trans-imagea href=https:reader043fdocumentsnetreader043viewer20220305035ab003207f8b9a22118def70html5page1jpg target=_blank img data-url=documentnpa-ratio-stood-at-670-in-q4-fy-2015-16-as-against-313in-q4-fy-2014-15-nethtmlpage=1 data-page=1 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 1: · PDF fileGross NPA ratio stood at 670% in Q4 FY 2015-16 as against 313%in Q4 FY 2014-15 Net NPA ratio stood at 448% in Q4 FY 2015-16 as against 190% in loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mM8Uw8AAh0BTZud3BwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= data-src=https:reader043fdocumentsnetreader043viewer20220305035ab003207f8b9a22118def70html5thumbnails1jpg width=140 height=200 adivdivdiv class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=2Page 2button div class=trans-imagea href=https:reader043fdocumentsnetreader043viewer20220305035ab003207f8b9a22118def70html5page2jpg target=_blank img data-url=documentnpa-ratio-stood-at-670-in-q4-fy-2015-16-as-against-313in-q4-fy-2014-15-nethtmlpage=2 data-page=2 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 2: · PDF fileGross NPA ratio stood at 670% in Q4 FY 2015-16 as against 313%in Q4 FY 2014-15 Net NPA ratio stood at 448% in Q4 FY 2015-16 as against 190% in loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mM8Uw8AAh0BTZud3BwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= data-src=https:reader043fdocumentsnetreader043viewer20220305035ab003207f8b9a22118def70html5thumbnails2jpg width=140 height=200 adivdivdiv class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=3Page 3button div class=trans-imagea href=https:reader043fdocumentsnetreader043viewer20220305035ab003207f8b9a22118def70html5page3jpg target=_blank img data-url=documentnpa-ratio-stood-at-670-in-q4-fy-2015-16-as-against-313in-q4-fy-2014-15-nethtmlpage=3 data-page=3 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 3: · PDF fileGross NPA ratio stood at 670% in Q4 FY 2015-16 as against 313%in Q4 FY 2014-15 Net NPA...