Novel Miniaturized Drug Conjugate Leverages HSP90 Driven ... · 6/4/2020 · Lack of site-specific...
Transcript of Novel Miniaturized Drug Conjugate Leverages HSP90 Driven ... · 6/4/2020 · Lack of site-specific...
1
Title: Novel Miniaturized Drug Conjugate Leverages HSP90 Driven Tumor Accumulation to
Overcome PI3K Inhibitor Delivery Challenges to Solid Tumors
Running Title: HSP90 Conjugate Overcomes PI3K Inhibitor Delivery Challenges
Authors and Affiliations: Samantha Perino1, Benoit Moreau2, Jessica Freda1, Amanda Cirello1, Brian H.
White2, James M. Quinn1, Kristina Kriksciukaite1, Ashwajith Someshwar1, Janel Romagnoli2, Megan
Robinson1, Sara Movassaghian1, Tyler Cipriani2, Richard Wooster2, Mark T. Bilodeau1, Kerry A. Whalen1
Authors affiliations: 1Tarveda Therapeutics Inc, 134 Coolidge Ave, Watertown MA U.S.A. 2Tarveda
Therapeutics former employees
Corresponding Author: Samantha Perino, Tarveda Therapeutics Inc, 134 Coolidge Ave, Watertown MA
02472. Phone 617-224-3551; email:[email protected]
Running Title: HSP90 Conjugate Overcomes PI3K Inhibitor Delivery Challenges
Keywords: Drug discovery technologies/Novel assay technology, drug targets/protein kinase &
phosphatase drug targets, Molecular pharmacology, Kinase inhibitors, small molecule therapeutics.
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest: All authors were or are employees and shareholders of
Tarveda Therapeutics Inc.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
2
Abstract: The Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is considered a master regulator for cancer
due to its frequent activation, making it an attractive target for pharmacologic intervention. While
substantial efforts have been made to develop drugs targeting PI3K signaling, few drugs have been able
to achieve the inhibition necessary for effective tumor control at tolerated doses.
HSP90 is a chaperone protein that is overexpressed and activated in many tumors and as a
consequence, small molecule ligands of HSP90 are preferentially retained in tumors up to 20 times
longer than in normal tissue. We hypothesize that the generation of conjugates that use a HSP90
targeting ligand and a payload such as Copanlisib, may open the narrow therapeutic window of this and
other PI3K inhibitors.
In support of this hypothesis, we have generated a HSP90-PI3K drug conjugate, T-2143 and utilizing
xenograft models, demonstrate rapid and sustained tumor accumulation of the conjugate, deep
pathway inhibition, and superior efficacy than the PI3K inhibitor on its own. Selective delivery of T-2143
and the masking of the inhibitor active site was also able to mitigate a potentially dose limiting side
effect of Copanlisib, hyperglycemia. These data demonstrate that by leveraging the preferential
accumulation of HSP90 targeting ligands in tumors, we can selectively deliver a PI3K inhibitor leading to
efficacy in multiple tumor models without hyperglycemia in mice. These data highlight a novel drug
delivery strategy that allows for the potential opening of a narrow therapeutic window through specific
tumor delivery of anticancer payloads and reduction of toxicity.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
3
Introduction
The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is one of the most frequently dysregulated signaling
cascades in cancer and is implicated in a wide range of tumor types [1]. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway is
an intracellular signaling pathway that regulates cellular processes such as increased cell growth,
proliferation, and differentiation, which in combination with its common dysregulation in cancer, makes
it an attractive target for pharmacologic intervention [2]. Given the importance of this pathway in
cancer, more than 40 compounds that target the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway have been tested in clinical
trials involving patients with a wide range of tumor types. However, many of these agents have not
advanced beyond early stage clinical testing due to the inability to achieve deep pathway inhibition in
tumor tissue while avoiding dose-limiting toxicities in the patient [3-4]. Despite numerous PI3K-AKT-
mTOR inhibitors entering clinical trails only five pathway inhibitors, temsirolimus (mTOR), everolimus
(mTOR), idelalisib (PI3K), alpelisib (PI3K), and copanlisib (PI3K) have been approved by the FDA for
clinical use in the treatment of a number of different cancers, with the majority of approvals in liquid
tumors, demonstrating a clear need for novel approaches to achieving deep PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway
inhibition while hyperglycemia in the solid tumor setting.
Lack of site-specific drug delivery, particularly delivery of cytotoxic agents to tumors, has led to the
emergence of tumor-selective drug delivery systems over the last thirty years. Tumor selective drug
delivery systems include the use of targeting moieties, such as monoclonal antibodies, peptides, and
synthetic polymers, chemically linked to an active cytotoxic agent to form a drug conjugate [5-6]. While
antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors, with five
being currently marketed, they have potential deficiencies that include the slow speed of diffusion and
poor tumor penetration, potentially limiting effectiveness in the solid tumor setting [7]. The increased
time that an ADC is in circulation can lead to the prolonged release of payload in the bloodstream
causing potential systemic toxicities [8]. Given the liabilities of antibody-based therapies, miniaturized
drug conjugates have the potential to target tumor cells allowing for rapid accumulation of potent
payloads in tumor cells deep into the core of the tumor and slowly release the payload over time giving
sustained delivery of the drug to the tumor while being quickly cleared from the plasma, resulting in a
decrease in overall toxicity. PEN-866, currently in Phase 1/2a (NCT03221400) applies these fundamental
principles and is a synthetic small molecule drug conjugate comprised of a Heat Shock Protein 90
(HSP90) targeting moiety attached through a cleavable linker to SN-38, the active metabolite of the
topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan (approved worldwide for the treatment of patients with colorectal
cancer and other cancers). HSP90 is a highly conserved and widely expressed molecular chaperone
protein that regulates a diverse range of cellular functions such as the folding, stability and degradation
of many proteins. As a result, HSP90 exerts marked effects on normal biology and disease processes [9-
10]. Although HSP90 is highly expressed in most cells, it has been shown to be upregulated and
activated in a variety of tumor cells compared to normal healthy tissue.
The activated form of HSP90 found in cancer tissues is present in a highly complexed state with co-
chaperone proteins with high ATPase activity, with these complexes functioning as a network to
enhance cellular survival, regardless of tissue of origin or genetic context. The consequence of this high
activation state is a propensity to selectively bind with high affinity to HSP90 inhibitors as compared to
the latent form of HSP90 found in normal tissue rendering HSP90 inhibitors selective for cancer cells [11-
12]. The selectivity of HSP90 inhibitors for the activated form of HSP90 present in the cancer cells allows
for preferential killing of cancer cells compared to normal cells [13-14]. While PEN-866 has been
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
4
designed to limit HSP90 inhibition, it still demonstrates selective targeting of the activated cancer form
of HSP90, and is able to penetrate, accumulate and be retained in the tumor cells leading to superior
antitumor activity when compared to an equimolar SN-38 dose of irinotecan and to small cell lung
cancer (SCLC) standard of care agents, cisplatin and topotecan [15-16].
Here we report on the preclinical characterization of an HSP90-PI3K conjugate. By leveraging the
preferential accumulation of HSP90-targeting ligands in tumors, as seen with PEN-866, and by masking
of the PI3K inhibitor active site though conjugation to an HSP90 targeting ligand, our HSP90-PI3K
conjugate selectively accumulates and is retained in tumors leading to deep pathway inhibition over
time with a decrease in a commonly observed toxicity, hyperglycemia, for PI3K alpha inhibitors. These
proof-of-concept experiments include demonstration of extended intratumoral drug exposures,
extended inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, and a superior therapeutic window as compared to
the PI3K inhibitor alone. Together, these results demonstrate a superior tumor-selective drug delivery
system that can deliver payloads directly to tumors, achieve sustained and deep pathway inhibition
while mitigating hyperglycemia
Materials and Methods
Compounds
The investigational compounds T-2026, T-2143 and T-2212 were synthesized according to the
procedures described in the supplementary material and were isolated and utilized as their respective
trifluoroacetate salts. T-2026 is the PI3K inhibitor payload that was incorporated into the conjugates. T-
2143 is the HSP90-binding conjugate of T-2026 and T-2212 is the non-binding control analog of T-2143
where part of the HSP90 binding pharmacophore has been blocked with the addition of a methyl group.
Copanlisib as the dihydrochloride salt was purchased from MedKoo Biosciences, Inc. The doses used for
all of the compounds in all in vivo experiments represent free base equivalent doses.
HSP90 binding activity assay.
Assays were carried out at BPS Biosciences, California USA. Briefly, the reactions were conducted at
room temperature for 3 hours in a 100 µl mixture containing assay buffer, 5 nM FITC Labeled
Geldanamycin and the test compound. Each compound was run in duplicate, ten-point curve starting at
a concentration of 10 M. Fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation of 485 nm and an
emission of 530 nm using a Tecan Infinite M1000 microplate reader. Fluorescence intensity is converted
to fluorescence polarization using the Tecan Magellan6 software. The fluorescence polarization data
were analyzed using the computer software, Graphpad Prism. The fluorescence polarization (FPt) in
absence of the compound in each data set was defined as 100% activity. In the absence of protein and
the compound, the value of fluorescent polarization (FPb) in each data set was defined as 0% activity.
The percent activity in the presence of the compound was calculated according to the following
equation: % activity = (FP-FPb)/(FPt-FPb)×100%, where FP= the fluorescence polarization in the presence
of the compound. For IC50 measurements, the values of % activity versus a series of compound
concentrations were then plotted using non-linear regression analysis of Sigmoidal dose-response curve
generated with the equation Y=B+(T-B)/1+10((LogEC50-X)×Hill Slope), where Y=percent activity, B=minimum
percent activity, T=maximum percent activity, X= logarithm of compound and Hill Slope=slope factor or
Hill coefficient. The IC50 value was determined by the concentration causing a half-maximal percent
activity.
Cell Culture
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
5
All cells lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The following cell lines
were maintained in the recommended media: NCI-H460 (ATCC HTB-177, RRID: CVCL_0459), HTC-116
(ATCC CCL-247, RRID: CVCL_0291), LS174T (ATCC CL-188, RRID: CVCL_1384), BT-474 (ATCC HTB-20,
RRID: CVCL_0179) and SKOV3 (ATCC HTB-77, RRID: CVCL_0532).
In vitro cellular proliferation
The following cell lines were seeded at 2500 cells/well in a 96-well plate: HCT116, LS174T and BT-474.
NCI-H460 cells were seeded at 500 cells/well. All cell lines were seeded in their respective medium.
Plated cells were incubated overnight before treatment. Cells were treated with a dose range of T-2212
and T-2143 which were dissolved in DMSO (Sigma D4540). The starting concentration was 10 µM for
each compound which was diluted by 3-fold for a total of ten data points. The number of viable cells was
determined by CellTiter-Glo 2.0 Cell Viability Assay (Promega G9243) through quantifying ATP following
the manufacturers protocol. All samples were run in duplicate. Inhibitory concentration of 50 percent
growth was determined using GraphPad statistical software, GraphPad Prism 6.
Cell Free Enzymatic Assay
The determinations of inhibitory concentration of 50 percent of PI3K3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3CD, and PIK3CG
activity with T-2143, copanlisib, or T-2026 were carried out at ProQinase GmbH using the Free Choice
Kinase Assay. All samples were run in duplicate.
In vivo studies
All studies were conducted in accordance with the Tarveda Therapeutics Institutional Animal Care and
Use Committee (IACUC). All mice were treated in accordance with the OLAW Public Health Service
Policy on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the ILAR Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals. Female athymic nude mice (CrTac:NCr-Foxn1nu) were purchased from Taconic (IMSR
Cat# TAC:ncrnu, RRID: IMSR_TAC:ncrnu). Infectious disease testing on the cell lines was done by Charles
River Laboratories Wilmington, MA by PCR using the Mouse Essential Clear Panel, within 3 years of cell
line use. Cells were only used if they had been passaged a total of 25 times or less. Mice were 8-11
weeks old and weighed approximately 20 grams at the time of dosing. T-2143, T-2212, copanlisib, and T-
2026 were all dosed intravenously. Animals were euthanized once tumors reached a maximum of 2000
mm3 or at the end of study, whichever came first. At the end of each study, the animals were
euthanized via CO2 inhalation followed by cervical dislocation to ensure death.
Cells were harvested from tissue culture and made into a final suspension by mixing with matrigel (BD
Biosciences, Catalog #CB-40234) (1:1 ratio). All cells were implanted subcutaneously in the right flank of
mice. LS174T (H1047R) and NCI-H460 (E545K) cells were implanted at a concentration of 2.5 × 106 cells
per mouse, BT-474 (K11N) cells were implanted at a concentration of 5.0 × 106 cells per mouse. Tumor
growth was monitored throughout the study and measured twice weekly. Tumor volume was measured
in two dimensions using calipers and volume was calculated using the formula: (w2 × l)/2= mm3,
assuming 1 mg is equivalent to 1 mm3 of tumor volume. The health of the mice was monitored, and
noteworthy clinical observations were recorded. Acceptable toxicity was defined as group mean body
weight (BW) loss of less than 20% during the study and not more than one treatment related death
among ten treated animals. Mice were randomized into treatment groups of ten animals per group and
therapy began when tumor volumes were approximately 200 mm3 usually 7-14 days post implantation.
For mouse in vivo studies, T-2143 and T-2212 were formulated in 5% DMSO (Alfa Aesar, HPLC grade) and
95% of freshly prepared 10% Solutol (Kolliphor HS 15) in 5.2% Dextrose (USP grade, Sigma Aldrich).
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
6
Copanlisib HCl (MedKoo Biosciences, Inc.) was prepared in 5% Mannitol (Pearlitol PF; Roquette) in water
for injection (HyPure, GE Hyclone). T-2026 dosing solution was prepared in 15% DMSO:Solutol (Alfa
Aesar, HPLC grade, Kolliphor HS 15) in 85% Dextrose (USP grade, Sigma Aldrich, Batch). All dosing
solutions were prepared fresh and transferred through 0.22 µm PTFE filters (Millex -LG, Merck Millipore)
in a sterile hood and the target doses were verified by established HPLC methods.
Pharmacokinetic Studies
Mice were dosed intravenously, three animals per each time-point were anesthetized using CO2 and
~1.0 mL of blood sample was collected via cardiac puncture using a needle (BD, Catalog# 14-826-88).
While animals were still anesthetized, the animals were euthanized via cervical dislocation. Blood was
transferred to K2EDTA sample collection tube (BD, Catalog #02-669-33), inverted four times and
centrifuged for 10 minutes at 10,000 x g, plasma harvested, transferred into labeled 96-well plate, and
stored at -80º C.
Pharmacodynamic Studies
Mice bearing LS174T and BT-474 tumors were treated with copanlisib at 10.6 mg/kg, 25 mg/kg of T-2143
or 25 mg/kg of T-2212 (N=3). Tumors were collected 1, 24, or 72 hours post dose. Xenograft tumors
were processed for lysate using Cell Lysis Buffer 10X (Cell Signaling 9803) diluted to 1X. Proteins were
separated by SDS-PAGE on NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris Protein Gels, 1.5mm, 15-well (Thermo Fisher
NP0336BOX). Proteins were transferred from the gel to a nitrocellulose membrane using iBlot Transfer
Stack, nitrocellulose, regular size (Thermo Fisher IB301001). After the transfer, the membrane was
blocked in PBS Blocking Buffer (LI-COR 927-40000). This was followed by overnight incubation of 1:2000
Phospho-Akt (Ser473) (D9E) XP Rabbit mAb (Cell Signaling 4060, RRID:AB_2224726) and 1:1000 GAPDH
(D4C6R) Mouse mAb (Cell Signaling 97166, RRID:AB_2756824) at 4˚C. After the primary incubation, the
membrane was washed with Pierce 20X TBS Tween 20 Buffer (Thermo Fisher 28360) and incubated
further for one hour at room temperature with the secondary antibodies: 1:10000 IRDye 680RD Goat
anti-Rabbit IgG (LI-COR 926-68071) and 1:10000 IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Mouse IgG (LI-COR 926-32210).
Then the membrane was imaged on the LI-COR Odyssey Imaging System. Bands were quantified based
on their size and brightness using LI-COR Odyssey imaging software.
Efficacy Studies
All doses were scaled to the BW of the individual animals at a dose volume of 10 mL/kg. Treatment
regimens and dosages in each experiment are described in the Results and in the Figure Legends. Each
treatment group consisted of ten animals. Percent tumor growth inhibition (%TGI) was defined as the
difference between the mean tumor volume (MTV) of the vehicle and the MTV of the drug treated
group, expressed as a percentage of the MTV of the vehicle group. Statistical analysis was done using
one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons in GraphPad statistical software, GraphPad Prism 6.
A single efficacy study is represented in the graphs presented in the paper, however, for both the BT-
474 and LS174T studies, separate graphs are shown to comparing T-2143 to either the negative control,
T-2122, or the components that collectively represent T-2143 copanlisib and ganetespib, respectively, as
shown in Figures 2 and 5.
Body Weight measurements
Animals were weighed on the days indicated in the graphs (Supplementary Figures S3a-c). For each
treatment group, weights were averaged and compared to the average weight of the group on first day
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
7
of treatment to obtain the percent change in weight. Statistical analysis was done using one-way
ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons in GraphPad statistical software, GraphPad Prism 6.
Blood Glucose Study
Non tumor bearing mice were dosed intravenously with equimolar concentrations of the vehicle, 10.8
mg/kg copanlisib, 25 mg/kg T-2143 and 10.8 mg/kg T-2026. Each treatment group consisted of N=5.
Mice were monitored for any significant health changes. For the T-2143 and vehicle control groups tails
were pricked 1, 4, 6, and 24-hours post dosage. For all other groups blood was sampled 1-hour post
dosage and blood glucose readings were taken with the AlphaTRAK 2 Blood Glucose Monitoring System
(Zoetis CFGW210-M1673).
Tumor and Plasma Pharmacokinetic Analysis
In vivo sample preparation
Standard calibrations were prepared by serially diluting 3 mM methanol (Fisher Scientific, Cat. A456-4)
stock solutions of T-2143, T-2212 and T-2026 in pooled BALB/C female mouse Lithium Heparin plasma
(Bioreclamation IVT, Cat. MSE02PLLHXNN). Mouse tumors were weighed and homogenized in PBS
(Fisher Scientific, Cat. 14040133) containing 100 nM of dichlovous (Sigma, Cat. 45441) using a handheld
tissue homogenizer (Omni). A protein precipitation procedure was performed with 100 µL of blank
plasma standards, homogenate and sampled mouse plasma, crashed with 300 µL of acetonitrile (Fisher
Scientific, Cat. A998SK-4) containing 0.1% formic acid (Fisher Scientific, Cat. A117-50) and 100 ng/mL of
glyburide (Sigma, Cat. G2539) into a 96-well plate. The samples were capped, vortexed to mix, then
centrifuged at 3500 x g for 5 minutes. 100 µL of the supernatant was then transferred to a new 96-well
plate before LC-MS/MS analysis.
LC-MS/MS for Quantification
An LC-MS/MS method was developed for investigational molecules; T-2143, T-2212 and T-2026. Leap
technologies HTS PAL autosampler was used to inject 10 µL of sample volume to ABSciex 4000 series
tandem mass spectrometer coupled with a Shimadzu LC10AD VP LC system (Columbia, MD). An ACE 3
C18 3 µM, 50 X 2.1 mm column (PN ACE-111-0502) was used to chromatographically separate analytes.
Mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and water containing 0.2M of
ammonium acetate (Fisher Scientific, A637-500) and 0.1% formic acid(B). A gradient elution was
employed, starting at 5% A, holding for 0.5 minutes, increasing to 95% A over 3 minutes, holding for 1.5
minutes then re-equilibrating at 5% A for 1.1 minutes. Mass spectrometric detection was performed
using electrospray ion source operating in positive mode. The mass spectrometer was operated in
multiple reaction monitoring mode, monitoring m/z for analytes, T-2143, T-2212, T-2026 and glyburide
(internal standard). Analysist software version 1.6.2 (ABSciex) was used to fit T-2143, T-2212 and T-2026
standard curves with a linear 1/x weighted fit.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using Phoenix WinNonlin version 8.1
(Certara).
Results
HSP90 Binding is Essential for Miniaturized Drug Conjugate Activity
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
8
Our HSP90-PI3K conjugates are comprised of an HSP90 targeting moiety, cleavable linker, and an anti-
cancer therapeutic payload. Linkers and payloads of the Pentarin platform are designed and optimized
in such a way as to mask the payload’s active site through linker attachment to the payload, rendering
the payload inactive until intracellular cleavage releases the active payload within the tumor cell. The
pharmacophore of the T-2143 is based off of the HSP90 inhibitor, ganetespib. For our proof of concept
experiments the PI3K inhibitor copanlisib was chosen as the model payload. Copanlisib was modified by
converting the terminal morpholine to a piperazine to produce T-2026. This incorporated an amine that
could be used for the purposes of linking. The piperazine analog of copanlisib was shown to be highly
potent across PI3K sub-types, similar to copanlisib (Table 1). The conjugate of this piperazine was
constructed with a carboxyesterase cleavable linker to the HSP90 binding pharmacophore as shown for
the structure of T-2143 (Figure 1a). It was found that linking to the payload in this way diminished
inhibition of PI3K sub-types (Table 1). A non-binding control of T-2143, T-2212, was generated through
blocking the HSP90 binding pharmacophore with a single methyl group addition to one of the resorcinol
hydroxyl groups. The binding affinity to HSP90 of the molecules was determined using a competitive
binding assay, where the competitive molecule was a fluorescently labeled version of the potent HSP90
binding molecule, geldanamycin. The addition of a methyl group proved to be sufficient to completely
block the binding affinity as compared to T-2143 with an IC50 of 84 nM and Kd of 1.4 nM as compared to
no appreciable inhibition of activity by T-2212 up to concentrations of 10 M (Figure 1b). Further, the Kd
of T-2143 is equivalent to ganetespib, with a binding Kd of 0.5 nM. This conservative molecular
modification has very little impact on the overall properties of T-2212 and has been shown to not have
an impact on the mouse pharmacokinetic profile relative to T-2143 (Table 2; Supplemental Figure S1).
PIK3CA mutations occur in about 15% to 30% of breast, endometrial, and colon cancers. A panel of cell
lines harboring common gain of function activating PIK3CA mutations, and reported to be sensitive to
pathway inhibition, were chosen for HSP90-PI3K conjugate testing. The in vitro antiproliferative
activities of T-2143 and T-2212 were tested in comparison to the PI3K inhibitor alone, copanlisib [17-22].
In the cell lines selected, potent cell kill activity similar to copanlisib could only be achieved with T-2143,
not T-2212. Furthermore, in three out of the five cell lines tested fifty percent cell growth inhibition
could not be achieved with T-2212, whereas T-2143 and copanlisib demonstrated a potent effect on cell
viability, showing that HSP90 targeting is essential for delivery of the PI3K inhibitor payload from our
miniaturized drug conjugate (Table 3).
To further investigate the dependence of HSP90 targeting for tumor specific payload delivery of our
HSP90-PI3K conjugate, tumor pharmacokinetic and efficacy studies were carried out in LS174T colon
cancer xenograft-bearing mice comparing T-2143 against T-2212. Initial experiments defined the
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of T-2143 and T-2212 at 25 mg/kg given once weekly. In support of the
MTD data, the body weights for all efficacy studies are shown in Supplementary Figure S3 (a-c) and
demonstrate tolerability of the compounds at doses up to 25 mg/kg given once weekly. The validity of T-
2212 as an appropriate control was further evaluated through plasma pharmacokinetic studies in mice,
described in more detail below. Briefly, the plasma concentration versus time curves showed a high
degree of similarity for T-2143 and T-2212 and resulted in closely matched half-lives and areas under the
curve (AUC), suggesting that any differences in in vivo activity would not be a result of differences in
plasma pharmacokinetic profiles, but due to differences in HSP90 binding ability (Table 2 Figure S1).
Following a single bolus injection of T-2143 or T-2212, at their maximum tolerated dose (MTD) 25mg/kg,
LS174T tumors and plasma were harvest 24, 48, and 72 hours post dose. Tumors and were analyzed for
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
9
total HSP90-PI3K conjugate levels. In agreement with the in vitro data that suggests the targeting is
important for activity of the drug, T-2143 tumor levels were significantly higher than T-2212 tumors
levels with approximately 6-fold higher concentration at both the 24- and 48-hour time points (Figure
2a). T-2143 and T-2212 were also tested for differences in effects on tumor growth inhibition (TGI). Mice
bearing LS174T or BT474 tumors were treated with T-2143 or T-2212 and evaluated for their effects on
TGI after two weekly MTD doses. In the LS174T model, T-2143 treatment led to a TGI of 87% while T-
2212 treatment resulted in a minimal TGI of 29%, demonstrating a statistically significant increase in
tumor growth inhibition with T-2143 as compared to non-targeted control (P = 0.006) (Figure 2b) Results
in the BT474 model demonstrated similar results with T-2143 treatment leading to a 72% in TGI, while T-
2212 was only able to achieve a TGI of 16% (Figure 2c).Together, these data demonstrate that HSP90
binding is essential for successful tumor delivery of the PI3K inhibitor payload from our HSP90-PI3K
miniaturized drug conjugate.
Tumor Retention of HSP90-PI3K Conjugate Leads to Deep and Durable PI3K Pathway Inhibition
The pharmacokinetic profile of T-2143 was evaluated following administration of a single intravenous
dose in non-tumor bearing mice. T-2143 exhibited a low volume of distribution, a plasma clearance rate
of 2.62 mL/kg/min, and a half-life of 7.4 hours, demonstrating that T-2143 is relatively quickly cleared
from circulation reducing the chances for normal tissue exposure and toxicity (Figure 3). Levels of
released payload, T-2026, from T-2143 were also measured in the plasma. Very minimal amounts of T-
2026 were detectable in the plasma with a Cmax of 0.3 µM while T-2143 was able to achieve a Cmax of 121
µM, demonstrating that while T-2143 is in circulation, minimal amounts of payload are released
decreasing the chances for toxicity from payload exposure. As discussed above, the plasma half-life of T-
2212 was similar to T-2143 and the similarities extended to the other pharmacokinetic parameters
(Table 2). Next, pharmacodynamic experiments were conducted to investigate conjugate accumulation
and release the payload in tumor over time despite being cleared from the plasma.
PIK3CA mutations and amplifications are known to be drivers of AKT pathway activation, with AKT being
central to the activity of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway [23-26]. As a result of AKT’s importance to the
pathway we investigated the ability of T-2143 to effectively target the tumor, be retained, and deliver
the PI3K inhibitor payload over time. Pharmacodynamic analysis was performed in PI3K mutated BT-474
breast cancer xenograft-bearing mice where T-2143 was administered as a single intravenous bolus
injection of T-2143 and tumors were collected at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours post dose. Tumors were split
then analyzed for T-2143 tumor retention and pAKT(S473) levels over time. T-2143 was rapidly taken up
by the tumor with 1.2 µM measured at the 1-hour time point. The highest tumor levels were measured
24 hours post dose with 2.3 µM of T-2143 measured at this time point. T-2143 was well retained in the
tumor with 0.55 µM still measured 72-hour post dose. Tumor payload levels increased over time with
2.1 µM still detectable at the 72-hour time point (Figure 3b). Tumor accumulation and sustained release
of the payload translated into durable PI3K pathway inhibition. While at the 1-hour time point pAKT
levels only decreased 33% relative to the vehicle control, at 24 hours post dose a 75% reduction was
observed, which was sustained out to 72 hours with an 83% reduction measured at this time point
(Figure 3c). Together these data suggest that although the conjugate is rapidly cleared from the plasma,
T-2143 can effectively target and accumulate in tumors and that accumulation of T-2143 leads to
sustained release of the payload, and PI3K pathway suppression over time.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
10
In order to inform the schedule of efficacy dosing, more extended pharmacodynamic and
pharmacokinetic experiments were carried out in the LS174T xenograft model. Mice were administered
a single dose of T-2143 or its vehicle control and tumors were collected at 1, 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours
post dose. As in the BT-474 model, T-2143 rapidly accumulated and was retained in LS174T tumors with
0.431 µM of T-2143 and 1.45 µM of the payload detected at the 72-hour time point, which translated
into an 82% reduction in pAKT levels relative to the payload (Figure 4). By the 7-day (168 hour) time
point, only 0.09 µM of T-2143 was detectable in the tumor and the pAKT signal had returned to levels
similar to that of the vehicle, suggesting that T-2143 could be dosed on a once a week schedule to
achieve deep pathway inhibition.
Masking of Payload Active Site Increases Therapeutic Window
Hyperglycemia is a known and potentially dose limiting side effect of PI3K inhibitors due to their
interaction with the insulin-glucose regulatory axis [22]. While this effect is usually transient due to the
compensatory insulin release from the pancreas, it has been shown that this insulin feedback can
reactivate PI3K-mTOR signaling in tumors, compromising the inhibitor’s effectiveness [30]. Our HSP90
miniaturized drug conjugates are designed with the payload binding site blocked by the linker to prevent
binding to the target until the payload is released. Payload activity is blocked until the HSP90 ligand
targets the conjugate to tumor cells and the payload is released through linker cleavage preferentially in
the cancer cell. In addition, HSP90 conjugates are also designed to have short plasma circulation
allowing for rapid accumulation and penetration into the tumor while potentially limiting the overall
exposure to normal tissue. By incorporating tumor specific delivery and masking of the T-2143 payload
while in circulation we hypothesized that with our conjugate we could mitigate an increase in glucose,
resulting in a larger therapeutic window.
In a cell free PIK3CA enzyme assay, the HSP90-PI3K conjugate T-2143 is 116-fold less active than
copanlisib but retains potent cell kill activity demonstrating the ability to mask the payload’s active site
until it is delivered directly to the tumor cells (Table 1). To test this in vivo, mice were treated with a
single intravenous bolus dose of 25 mg/kg T-2143, an equimolar dose of copanlisib to the payload
amount of T-2143 (10.8 mg/kg), or the T-2143 vehicle alone. One-hour post compound administration,
copanlisib treatment led to four-fold increase in blood glucose levels in comparison to the vehicle
control. The average blood glucose level in the vehicle control group was 128 mg/dL while the copanlisib
group increased to 553 mg/dL and the T-2143 group average level stayed at 124 mg/dL (Figure 5). The
effect of T-2143 on blood glucose levels was additionally measured at 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose
administration. No increase in blood glucose levels relative to the vehicle control was detected with T-
2143 administration, demonstrating the ability of the HSP90-PI3K conjugate to reduce target specific
toxicity, hyperglycemia, through payload active site masking, potentially increasing the therapeutic
window (Supplemental 2a).
Superior Tumor Growth Inhibition Observed with HSP90-PI3K Conjugate in Comparison to Copanlisib
Alone.
Antitumor activity of T-2143 was evaluated in comparison to copanlisib alone in mouse xenograft
models of human cancer all reported by ATCC to have mutations in the PIK3CA gene that result in gain
of function activity of the pathway. The three models, LS174T (H1047R), BT-474 (K11N), and NCI-H460
(E545K), were treated with T-2143, copanlisib, ganetespib, the combination of copanlisib and
ganetespib, or a vehicle control. Ganetespib was chosen to represent the effects of the HSP90 targeting
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
11
moiety alone since it is structurally similar to the ligand used in T-2143 and the molecules have similar
binding affinities as described above [27]. Copanlisib and ganetespib doses were chosen on an
equimolar basis to either the amount of payload or ligand used to create T-2143. All treatments were
dosed on a once per week basis and given as a single bolus intravenous injection. In all three models
tested T-2143 treatment was well tolerated with no significant body weight loss observed
(Supplementary Figure S3 a-c). In the NCI-H460 non-small cell lung cancer xenograft model, T-2143 was
the only treatment able to produce statistically significant tumor growth inhibition as compared to
vehicle with a TGI of 48% (P=0.043). Copanlisib alone was only able to achieve a TGI of 15%, while the
combination of copanlisib achieved a TGI of 8% (Figure 6a). In the BT-474 breast cancer xenograft
model, T-2143 treatment resulted in a TGI of 74%, while copanlisib alone, or the combination of
copanlisib and ganetespib, was only able to achieve a TGI of 22% as compared to vehicle alone.
Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between the treatment of T-2143 when
compared to the activity of the combination treatment (P=0.02), demonstrating a superior efficacious
response in this model over the payload or combination treatment (Figure 6b). Results in the LS174T
colon cancer model were similar to that of the BT-474 model, where T-2143 was not only able to
achieve superior anti-tumor activity with a TGI of 87% compared to vehicle, but it was statistically
significant from the treatment of copanlisib alone (TGI 31%, P = 0.009) or the combination treatment
(TGI, 33%, P = 0.01) (Figure 6c). The superior efficacy of T-2143 compared to copanlisib is also
consistent with the ability of T-2143 to inhibit the signaling more potently and more sustainably as
compared to companlisib (Supplemental Figure S4). Together these results demonstrate the ability of T-
2143 to effectively target the tumor and release the payload overtime resulting in superior tumor
growth inhibition in comparison to the payload alone.
Discussion
Lack of tumor-specific delivery of anticancer agents presents a number of challenges to their ability to
be efficacious. Poor tumor specificity can lead to high toxicity and lack of sufficient target engagement,
all resulting in a low therapeutic window. While ADCs have provided a means of site-specific delivery of
anticancer agents, they have traditionally only been used to deliver well characterized cytotoxic agents
to cancer cells and have potential limitations in treating solid tumors [28-29]. In cancer, HSP90 is
expressed in an activated and highly complexed state, and it has been demonstrated that HSP90
inhibitors have a propensity to selectively bind with high affinity to the activated from as compared to
the latent form of HSP90 found in normal tissue rendering HSP90 inhibitors selective for cancer cells [11-
12]. This tumor selective delivery has also been demonstrated for the HSP90 conjugate, PEN-866, which
has potent binding affinity and tumor selectivity, without significantly inhibiting HSP90 activity [15].
Here we have demonstrated a way to leverage preferential HSP90 binding and selectively deliver anti-
cancer payloads beyond cytotoxic agents, through a set of proof-of-concept experiments.
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is one of the most important intracellular pathways and is
dysregulated in a wide spectrum of human cancers. Although considered a master regulator of cancer,
only five pathway inhibitors, temsirolimus (mTOR), everolimus (mTOR), idelalisib (PI3K), alpelisib (PI3K),
and copanlisib (PI3K) have been approved to date for clinical use with the majority of approvals in liquid
tumors. Based on the clear need for novel approaches to achieving deep PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway
inhibition while decreasing toxicity in the solid tumor setting, we utilized the Pentarin platform to
generate a HSP90 conjugate containing an inhibitor of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, T-2143. Given the
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
12
FDA approval status and pre-clinical activity of copanlisib, this drug was chosen as a model payload to
demonstrate our ability to selectively deliver payloads from this class directly to tumor cells [19].
T-2143 was designed to circumvent the limitations of currently available PI3K inhibitors. The
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of T-2143 demonstrated the ability to selectively target
and rapidly penetrate into solid tumors, have a significant effect on pathway inhibition, and mitigate a
known dose limiting toxicity of PI3K inhibitors that inhibit the alpha PI3K isoform and suggests the
potential to mitigate toxicities of drugs that inhibit this isoform [30]. The short plasma circulation time of
T-2143 limits overall exposure, however, tumor specific delivery of T-2143 was not compromised. As
shown in the experiments presented here, T-2143 was able to rapidly accumulate in tumors and achieve
deep PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibition as evidenced by the inhibition of phospho-AKT. Due to the
sustained release of the payload over time, T-2143 is able to achieve deeper pathway inhibition in
comparison to copanlisib alone which has been demonstrated to inhibit the pathway early but not in a
sustainable fashion as evidenced by the signal rebounding over time [19].
Here, we demonstrated that through optimized linker chemistry, the copanlisib active site of T-2143 was
masked while the conjugate remains in circulation, with selective cleavage and release of the PI3K
payload occurring within the tumor. Hyperglycemia is a known and potentially dose limiting side effect
of PI3K inhibitors due to their interaction with the insulin-glucose regulatory axis [22]. The masking of
the payload in T-2143 allowed for the mitigation of a spike in blood glucose in contrast to copanlisib
which led to a significant increase in blood glucose levels. Together, these data demonstrate that as a
result of the thoughtful design of T-2143, we were able to achieve deep tumor penetration, sustainable
pathway inhibition, and minimize toxic side effects seen with other alpha targeting- pathway inhibitors
thereby increasing the payloads therapeutic window.
The data presented here also demonstrated that the targeting moiety of T-2143 is necessary for tumor
accumulation. The HSP90 binding ability of T-2143 leads to accumulation of the payload in vivo, when
compared to the non-binding control, demonstrating that the HSP90 binding capacity of T-2143 is
necessary for intratumoral accumulation of the payload. Further evidence was provided by
demonstrating that not only was the HSP90 binding necessary for tumor accumulation, but that it was
sufficient to deliver the PI3K payload and achieve deep pathway inhibition over time. This was validated
by persistent drug activity and suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, which translated into
remarkable effects on tumor growth inhibition in comparison to copanlisib alone. In all models tested T-
2143 was able to achieve tumor growth inhibition greater than copanlisib alone, demonstrating that site
directed delivery and sustained release of the payload translates into greater activity in vivo.
Furthermore, each of the three models tested are reported to have a different PIK3CA mutational
status, showing that T-2143 can be effective regardless of the PIK3CA mutational background. Tumor
growth inhibition achieved with T-2143 was also superior to treatment with a combination of
ganetespib and copanlisib, providing evidence that our improved anti-tumor activity is unlikely a result
of the dosing of both of the payload and HSP90 targeting moiety but rather a direct result of sustained
intratumoral release of the payload from HSP90-PI3K conjugate accumulation. Together the data
demonstrates that our miniature drug conjugates are designed to leverage the preferential expression
of HSP90 in cancer, deliver payloads directly to tumors, and achieve deep pathway inhibition overtime
greater than the payload alone.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
13
In summary, we have presented proof-of-concept experiments demonstrating a unique way of
leveraging the selective over-expression and activation of HSP90 in solid tumors to deliver payloads,
beyond traditional cytotoxic agents used in other tumor selective delivery systems. Using this platform,
we have the potential to target payloads to selectively accumulate to solid tumors and destroy the
tumor cells while minimizing exposure of healthy tissue to the payloads, thereby increasing the payloads
therapeutic window.
[1] Weigelt B, Downward J. Genomic Determinants of PI3K Pathway Inhibitor Response in Cancer. Front
Oncol. 2012; 2:109. Published 2012 Aug 31. doi:10.3389/fonc.2012.00109
[2] Curigliano, G. and Shah, R. (2019). Safety and Tolerability of Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K)
Inhibitors in Oncology. - PubMed - NCBI. [online] Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Available at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649751.
[3] Janku, Filip, Yap, Timothy A., Meric-Bernstam, Funda Targeting the PI3K pathway in cancer: are we
making headway? Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 May;15(5):273-291. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.28. Epub
2018 Mar 6.
[4] Fruman DA, Chiu H, Hopkins BD, Bagrodia S, Cantley LC, Abraham RT. The PI3K Pathway in Human
Disease. Cell. 2017;170(4):605–635. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.029
[5] Jaracz S, Chen J, Kuznetsova LV, Ojima I. Recent advances in tumor targeting anticancer drug
conjugates. Bioorg Med Chem. 2005 Sep 1;13(17):5043-54: DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.04.084
[6] Abdollahpour‐Alitappeh, M, Lotfinia, M, Gharibi, T, et al. Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) for cancer
therapy: Strategies, challenges, and successes. J Cell Physiol. 2019 May;234(5):5628-5642. doi:
10.1002/jcp.27419. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
[7] Baker JH, Lindquist KE, Huxham LA, Kyle AH, Sy JT, Minchinton AI. Direct visualization of
heterogenous extravascular distribution of trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor
type 2 over expressing xenografts. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Apr 1;14(7):2171-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-
0432.CCR-07-4465
[8] Girish S, Gupta M, Wang B, et al. Clinical pharmacology of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1): an
antibody-drug conjugate in development for the treatment of HER2-positive cancer. Cancer Chemother
Pharmacol. 2012;69(5):1229–1240. doi:10.1007/s00280-011-1817-3
[9] Isaacs, J. S., Xu, W. & Neckers, L. Heat shock protein 90 as a molecular target for cancer therapeutics.
Cancer Cell 3, 213–217 (2003). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00029-1
[10] Mikko Taipale, Daniel F. Jarosz & Susan Lindquist, HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis:
emerging mechanistic insights; Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010 Jul;11(7):515-28. doi: 10.1038/nrm2918.
[11] Adeela Kamal, Lia Thao, John Sensintaffar, Lin Zhang, Marcus F. Boehm, Lawrence C. Fritz & Francis
J. Burrows: A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors. Nature
425, 407–410 (2003). DOI: 10.1038/nature01913
[12] Rodina A, Wang T, Yan P, et al. The epichaperome is an integrated chaperome network that
facilitates tumour survival. Nature. 2016;538(7625):397–401. doi:10.1038/nature19807
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
14
[13] Li Y, Zhang T, Schwartz SJ, Sun D. New developments in Hsp90 inhibitors as anti-cancer
therapeutics: mechanisms, clinical perspective and more potential. Drug Resist Updat. 2009;12(1-2):17–
27. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2008.12.002
[14] Chiosis G, Neckers L. Tumor selectivity of Hsp90 inhibitors: the explanation remains elusive. ACS
Chem Biol 2006; 1:279-84. DOI: 10.1021/cb600224w
[15] Proia D, Smith D, Zhang J, et al. HSP90 Inhibitor–SN-38 Conjugate Strategy for Targeted Delivery of
Topoisomerase I Inhibitor to Tumors. Mol Cancer Ther November 1 2015 (14) (11) 2422-2432; DOI:
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0455
[16] Gaponova AV, Nikonova AS, Deneka A, et al. A Novel HSP90 Inhibitor-Drug Conjugate to SN38 Is
Highly Effective in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(20):5120–5129. doi: 10.1158/1078-
0432.CCR-15-3068
[17] Yuan J, Mehta PP, Yin MJ, et al. PF-04691502, a Potent and Selective Oral Inhibitor of PI3K and
mTOR Kinases with Antitumor Activity, Mol Cancer Ther; 10(11); 2189–99. 2011 AACR. doi:
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0185.
[18] Foster P, Yamaguchi K, Hsu PP, et al. The Selective PI3K Inhibitor XL147 (SAR245408) Inhibits Tumor
Growth and Survival and Potentiates the Activity of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Preclinical Tumor
Models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):931-40. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0833.
[19] Liu N, Rowley B, Bull C, et al. BAY 80-6946 Is a Highly Selective Intravenous PI3K Inhibitor with
Potent p110α and p110δ Activities in Tumor Cell Lines and Xenograft Models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013
Nov;12(11):2319-30. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0993-T.
[20] Blaser B, Waselle L, Dormond-Meuwly A, et al. Antitumor activities of ATP-competitive inhibitors of
mTOR in colon cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12:86. Published 2012 Mar 8. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-
12-86
[21] Walla M, Baxi S, Mehta P, et al. Targeting Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring PIK3CA Mutation with a
Selective Oral PI3K Inhibitor PF-4989216. Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Feb 1;20(3):631-43. doi: 10.1158/1078-
0432.CCR-13-1663.
[22] Khan KH, Wong M, Rihawi K, et al. Hyperglycemia and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase
B/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) Inhibitors in Phase I Trials: Incidence, Predictive
Factors, and Management. Oncologist. 2016;21(7):855–860. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0248
[23] Porta C, Paglino C, Mosca A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling in Cancer. Front Oncol. 2014; 4:64.
Published 2014 Apr 14. doi:10.3389/fonc.2014.00064
[24] Fang WL, Huang KH, Lan YT, et al. Mutations in PI3K/AKT pathway genes and amplifications of
PIK3CA are associated with patterns of recurrence in gastric cancers. Oncotarget. 2016;7(5):6201–6220.
doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6641
[25] Mensah FA, Blaize JP, Bryan LJ. Spotlight on copanlisib and its potential in the treatment of
relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma: evidence to date. Onco Targets Ther. 2018; 11:4817–4827.
Published 2018 Aug 13. doi:10.2147/OTT.S142264
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
15
[26] Bhatti M, Ippolito T, Mavis C, et al. Pre-clinical activity of targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in
Burkitt lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9(31):21820–21830. Published 2018 Apr 24.
doi:10.18632/oncotarget.25072
[27] Weiwen Y, Zhenjian D, Lijun S, et al. Ganetespib, a Unique Triazolone-Containing Hsp90 Inhibitor,
Exhibits Potent Antitumor Activity and a Superior Safety Profile for Cancer Therapy. Mol Cancer Ther
February 1 2012 (11) (2) 475-484; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0755
[28] Gregori-Puigjané E, Setola V, Hert J, et al. Identifying mechanism-of-action targets for drugs and
probes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(28):11178–11183. doi:10.1073/pnas.1204524109
[29] Lambert JM, Morris CQ. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for Personalized Treatment of Solid
Tumors: A Review. Adv Ther. 2017;34(5):1015–1035. doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0519-6
[30] Hopkins BD, Pauli C, Du X, et al. Suppression of insulin feedback enhances the efficacy of PI3K
inhibitors [published correction appears in Nature. 2018 Aug 29;:]. Nature. 2018;560(7719):499–503.
doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0343-4
Table 1: Activity of T-2143, Copanlisib, and T-2026 in Cell Free Enzymatic Assay
Isoform
Inhibition of PI3K IC50 (nM)
T-2143
Copanlisib
T-2026
PIK3CA 81 0.7 0.3
PIK3CB 666 13 9.6
PIK3CD 167 0.5 1.1
PIK3CG 337 4.7 2.2
Table 1: Conjugation of Payload to HSP90 Targeting Moiety Results in Masking of the
Payload’s Active Site. The ability of T-2143 and copanlisib to inhibit four isoforms of PIK3CA
were evaluated in a cell free enzymatic assay.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
16
Table 2: T-2143 vs T-2212 Mouse Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profile
Parameter
Unit
T-2143
T-2212
Dose mg/kg 25 25
t1/2 hour 7.4 6.1
Cmax μM 121 122
AUC24h μM*h 133 114
Vz mL/kg 1691 1663
Vss mL/kg 1282 1270
CL mL/kg/min 2.6 3.2
Table 2: T-2143 and T-2212 Exhibit Similar Plasma Pharmacokinetic Profiles in Mice.
Mice were treated with a single IV bolus of 25 mg/kg of T-2143 or T-2212. Mice were sacrificed
and plasma collected at 0.83, 0.5, 2, 4, and 24 hours post dose. Plasma samples were analyzed
for T-2143 or T-2212 levels. T1/2 is elimination half-life, Cmax is maximum plasma drug
concentration, AUC24 is area under the plasma concentration curve from the time zero to time t,
VZ is volume of distribution during terminal phase, Vss is volume of distribution at steady state,
CL is total body clearance of drug from plasma.
Table 3: T-2143 Inhibits in Vitro Cellular Proliferation
Cell line
Inhibition of Proliferation IC50(nM)
T-2143
T-2212
Copanlisib
NCI-H460 10 90 39
LS174T 26 NA 109
HCT-116 27 NA 799
BT-474 44 NA 155
SKOV3 11 48 21
Table 3: T-2143 Inhibits In Vitro Cellular Proliferation Similar to Copanlisib, while the
non-binding control, T-2212, does not. Cells were treated with T-2143, T-2212, or copanlisib
for 72 hours and then measured for proliferation (N=3). *NA=50% inhibition not achieved at
highest concentration tested of 10µM.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
17
Figure 1: Chemical Structure and binding affinity of the HSP90-PI3K conjugate T-2143
and its non-HSP90 binding control T-2212
(a) T-2143 was constructed by linking the piperazine analog of copanlisib with a carboxyesterase
cleavable linker to the HSP90 binding pharmacophore. T-2212, the non-binding control of T-
2143, the HSP90 binding pharmacophore was blocked with a single methyl group addition to
one of the resorcinol hydroxyl groups to produce T-2212. T-2143 synthesis route summarized in
supplemental data.(b) The binding affinity of T-2143, T-2212 or positive control compound,
Geldanamycin to HSP90 N-terminal protein was determined using an in vitro competitive
binding assay competition of fluorescently labeled geldanamycin for binding to purified
recombinant HSP90α.
Figure 2: T-2143, but not T-2212, is retained in the PI3K mutant Colon Xenograft Model
LS174T, and Translates into Significant Anti-Tumor Activity
(a) Mice were treated with a single IV bolus of 25 mg/kg of T-2143 or T-2212. Mice were
sacrificed and tumors collected at 24, 48, or 72 hours post dose. Tumors were analyzed for T-
2143 or T-2212 levels. Error bars represent SEM (N=3/ time point). (b) Animals bearing
LS174T xenograft tumors were given T-2143(P < 0.0001) and the negative control, T-2212 (not
significant) on Day 1 and Day 7. Error bars represent SEM and statistical analysis done by one-
way ANOVA (n = 10 per group).
Figure 3: T-2143 is Cleared from Circulation and with minimal payload release, while
Tumor Accumulation and Sustained Payload Release Results in Deep PI3K Pathway
Inhibition in the PI3K mutant Breast Cancer Xenograft Model, BT-474
(a) Non-tumor bearing mice were treated with a single IV bolus of 25 mg/kg of T-2143. Mice
were sacrificed and plasma collected at 0.83, 0.5, 2, 4, and 24 hours post dose. Plasma was
analyzed for T-2143 levels and amount of released payload, T-2026. Error bars represent SEM
(N=3/ time point). (b) Mice bearing BT-474 tumors were administered a single 25mg/kg dose of
T-2143 or its Vehicle control. Tumors were collected at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours post dose, and
analyzed for T-2143 levels and released payload levels. Error bars represent SEM (N=3/ time
point) (c) Tumors were also analyzed for effects of T-2143 on pAKT (S473) levels. Error bars
represent SEM (N=3/ time point).
Figure 4: T-2143 Tumor Accumulation and Sustained Payload Release Allows for Once a
Week Dosing Schedule
(a) Mice bearing LS174T tumors were administered a single IV dose of a vehicle control or
25mg/kg of T-2143. Tumors were collected at 1, 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours post dose, and
analyzed for T-2143 levels and released payload levels overtime. Error bars represent SEM (N =
5/time point) (b) Tumors were also analyzed for effects of T-2143 on pAKT (S473) levels. Error
bars represent SEM (N=5/ time point).
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
18
Figure 5: Masking of Payload’s Active Site Mitigates Known Dose Limiting Toxicity
Observed with PI3K Inhibitors.
Non-tumor bearing mice were administered a single IV dose of 25 mg/kg T-2143 or a 10.8
mg/kg copanlisib. One-hour post dose blood was collected, and glucose levels measured using a
hand-held glucometer. Error bars represent SEM (N=5/group). The payload for T-2143, T-2026,
and was shown to have a similar effect to copanlisib(data in supplemental S2a). T-2143 was also
tested at 4, 6, and 24 hours post dose (data in supplemental S2b).
Figure 6: Superior Tumor Growth Inhibition Observed with T-2143 in Comparison to
Copanlisib Alone
Mice bearing either NCI-H460, BT-474, or LS174T tumors were treated with vehicle control, 25
mg/kg T-2143, 10.8 mg/kg copanlisib, 8.3 mg/kg ganetespib, or the combination of copanlisib
and ganetespib. Compounds were administered on Day 0 and Day 7. All statistics were
calculated using one-way ANOVA (a) In the NCI-H460 model T-2143 TGI was statistically
significant from the vehicle control (P=0.04) all other treatments were not statistically
significant. (b) In the BT-474 model T-2143 treatment was statistically different from that of
copanlisib (P = 0.02) and the combination treatment (P = 0.02). (c) In LS174T model T-2143
treatment was statistically different from that of copanlisib (P=0.009) and the combination
treatment (P = 0.01). Error bars represent SEM (n = 10 per group). BW data are summarized in
Supplementary Figures S3a-c.
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 1a:
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2
0
50
100
150
Concentration {log(M)}
Perc
en
t A
cti
vit
y
Geldanamycin
T-2143
T-2212
Figure 1b:
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 2a:
0 5 1 0
0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
D a y
Av
era
ge
Tu
mo
r V
olu
me
(mm
3)
V e h ic le C o n tro l
T -2 1 4 3
T -2 2 1 2
Figure 2b:
0 5 10 15
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Day
Avera
ge T
um
or
Vo
lum
e
(mm
3)
Vehicle Control
T-2143 (25mpk)
T-2212 (25mpk)
Figure 2c:
24 48 72 24 48 72 24 48 72
0
1
2
3
4
Time Post Dose (hours)
Co
nce
ntr
ati
on
(
M) T-2143
T-2212
Copanlisib
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 3a: Figure 3b:
Figure 3c:
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 4a: Figure 4b:
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 5:
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Figure 6a: Figure 6b:
Figure 6c:
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964
Published OnlineFirst June 4, 2020.Mol Cancer Ther Samantha Perino, Benoit Moreau, Jessica Freda, et al. Challenges to Solid TumorsTumor Accumulation to Overcome PI3K Inhibitor Delivery Novel Miniaturized Drug Conjugate Leverages HSP90 Driven
Updated version
10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964doi:
Access the most recent version of this article at:
Material
Supplementary
http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/suppl/2020/06/04/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964.DC1
Access the most recent supplemental material at:
Manuscript
Authoredited. Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been
E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts
Subscriptions
Reprints and
To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications
Permissions
Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)
.http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2020/06/04/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link
on November 16, 2020. © 2020 American Association for Cancer Research. mct.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on June 4, 2020; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0964