NOTTINGHAM MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY
-
Upload
duongkhuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of NOTTINGHAM MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY
436
PITT referred to some specimens, showing how the disposi-tion of vessels along the pelvis of the kidney and the uretermay give rise to a kink in the latter, and thus cause hydro-nephrosis.
Dr. G. NEWTON PITT read some notes on the post-mortemappearances in Chronic Alcobolnm. In thirty cases in whichphthisis was present, a dense fibroid pigmented change wasalmost invariably present in some portion of the lung, farmore frequently than in other cases of phthisis ; grey oryellow tubercles were less common, and caseous broncho-pneumonia was quite the exception. The prevalence ofthese fibroids, and to a certain extent reparative changes,appear to be associated with the taking of a largeamount of alcohol. Primâ facie, the chronic dyspepsia andirregular habits, the lack of food, and the gross impro-vidence and recklessness of these patients would lead us toexpect that their mortality from phthisis would be high.The Registrar-General’s reports, however, show that themortality from phthisis of publicans and others whoseoccupations expose them to special temptations to drink israther below than above the average. But acute tuber-culosis and pneumonia are very liable to occur in suchpatients, and the tubercular nature of the disease may oftenbe overlooked during life. It is noteworthy that aboutthree-fourths of the cases of alcoholic neuritis, and about afifth of those of alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, are foundpost mortem to have also tubercular legions. The associa-tion of such lesions with cirrhosis is seldom insisted upon,but is of importance. Out of 110 cases of alcoholic cirrhosis,in twenty-three there were tubercular lesions, phthisis mostcommonly, but in some acute tuberculosis or tubercularperitonitis. Dr. Pitt’s conclusions were that tubercularlesions in the lung in alcoholic subjects generally take afibroid form, and that tubercular lesions are not infrequentlyassociated with alcoholic neuritis and hepatic cirrhosis.-Drs. F. J. Smith, Turner, and Gilbert, and the Presidentdiscussed the paper, and referred to cases illustrating andconfirming the conclusions arrived at.
NOTTINGHAM MEDICO-CHIRURGICALSOCIETY.
THE ordinary meeting was held on Wednesday, Jan. 21st,Mr. C. H. White, President, in the chair.
Tuberculous Meat.—Dr. BOOBBYER exhibited the lungs,heart, liver, spleen, and some lymphatic glands froma cow which had recently been seized, slaughtered, anddestroyed by the town authorities on its exposure foraale in the fat stock market of the borough. He pointedout the very extensive infiltration of tuberculous matter.and comparatively small amount of necrotic action.All the internal organs, excepting the heart, were moreor less invaded. The left lung was affected in almostevery part with miliary tubercle, and the liver wasthickly studded with deposits of various sizes, some aslarge as oranges. He showed that the physical signsand special symptoms in so pronounced a case as thisalmost necessarily implied a guilty knowledge on the
part of the vendors, althougii the magistrates beforewhom the case was taken declined to accept this view.The general emaciation, arched back, retracted abdo-men, and staring coat, together with the frequent cough,jerky respiration from pleuritic adhesions, and continuousdiarrhcea, were indications the import of which could notwell be mistaken. Dr. Boobbyer briefly drew attention tothe experiments of Toussaint, Bouley, Chauveau, Corn!],Arloing, Nocard, Peuch, Gerlach, Johul, and others, withthe flesh or juices of tuberculous animals upon others in apreviously healthy condition, both natural ingestion andartificial injection being used, which all went to show thatgreat risk of infection attended the use of the bodies oftuberculous animals as food for the healthy. Dr. Boobbyerdescribed the attitude of the home and some ContinentalGovernments and local authorities with respect to the im-portant question of how far tuberculous disease in animalsshould be considered as rendering them unfit for food, andsaid that the Sheriff of Glasgow probably erred, if he erredat all, on the right side when he gave it as his decision,after hearing a large amount of evidence, that the simplep esence of the disease, however slight its development, wasin itself a disqualification.
Mr. BELCHER showed a case of Erythema Iris in a managed forty.Notes on Cancer of the Breast.-Mr. HATHERLY read notes
of some cases of cancer of the breast which had occurred inhis practice. He accepted unreservedly the doctrine of apre-cancerous or local btage of cancer, and dwelt upon thedifficulty of recognising with any certainty the exact periodwhen a non-matignant growth might become malignant.The micro3cope even was of little assistance, as the celldegeneration characteristic of cancer is not a sudden but agradual process, the same specimen often showing cellsvarying within wide limits as to the degree of degeneration.He referred to Mr. Jonathan Hutchinson’s doctrine, thatcancer was not due to any special material introducedfrom without, but that it was simply a modification ofthat which occurred in chronic inflammation. Mr.Hatherly was strongly in favour of early operation,even in cases where there might be some doubts as tothe diagnosis ; in doubtful cases the patient should havethe benefit of the doubt, otherwise the most favourableperiod for operation would be allowed to slip, and an earlyreturn of the disease would be highly probable. Headvocated free removal, and thought too much attentionwas paid to union by first intention. In one case in whichhe had amputated the breast in a rather advanced case,union took place by first intention, but there was ominousinduration of the scar within a fortnight after the woundhad healed. A second operation was performed, and the wholescar was freely excised; the edges of the wound were nearlyfour inches apart; healing by granulation was rapid, andthe patient had no return of the disease for several months.He attached the greatest importance to any brawny condi.tion of the skin, and thought it even of more unfavourable im-port than induration of the axillary glands. He gave notesof some interesting cases in support of his view of thenecessity of free excision, and thought that in thelarge majority of cases, however litrle advanced theywere, the most promising course was to remove thewhole gland. He thought that in dealing with malignantdisease conservative surgery was a mistake. - ThePRESIDENT directed attention to the importance ofexcising cancerous growths freely, and condemned cheese-paring with aview to obtain rapid healing and neat cicatrix.-Dr. CATTLE quoted a case in which a tumour, after twentyyears of imperceptible growth, had assumed malignantcharacters and caused the patient’s death. He thoughtsuch changes in the character of new growths occurred at aperiod of life when there was a general tendency to de-generative changes -Messrs. BLURTON and WRAY alsospoke. Specimen. -Dr. CATTLE showed for Mr. Chicken a
Cystic Sarcoma of Testis removed by castration from a managed twenty. The diagnosis from hydrocele, baematocele,and encephaloid was discussed. Dr. Cattle showed a
microscopical section of the tumour.
Reviews and Notices of Books.National Health. Abridged from "The Health of
Nations." A Review of the Works of Sir EdwinChadwick, K.C.B. By B W. RICHARDSON, M.D.,F.RS. Pp.320. London: Longmans and Co. 1890.
THE author informs us in the preface that this volumewas prepared to meet the request on the part of the publicfor an abridged and less expensive edition of his originalwork, and may be considered an abridgment of the mostpopular and practical portions of it. Introductory to thepart relating to National Health is a biographical sketch ofSir Edwin Chadwick. Born at Lysaght, near Manchester,in 1800, he received his education entirely at private schoolsand by private tutors. After passing some time in an
attorney’s office as a pupil, he enrolled himself as a studentof the Inner Temple, and was called to the bar in November,1830. While carrying on his studies he supplied reports tothe Morning Herald and the London Review, and contributedto the latter two papers in 1829, one on Preventive Policeand the other on Public Charities in France. In 1828 he