Notice of Objection, nh 7

8/8/2019 Notice of Objection, nh 7

1/18

U.S. District Court

District of New Hampshire (Concord)

USA, Ex Rel et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 1:10-cv-00321-JL

USA et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF OBJECTION TO 11/23/2010 ENDORSED MAGISTRATE ORDER

PLAINTIFF RACKETEERING VICTIMS OBJECT UNDER THE RULES

1. On 11/24/2010, the Plaintiff Government corruption victims read the below ENDORSED

ORDER (Entered: 11/23/2010). The Plaintiffs object to said MAGISTRATE ORDER,

because an F.B.I. raid is not the proper process and/or procedure to defend against

record proof ofGovernment racketeering and corruption.

11/19/2010 ENDORSED ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion toExtend Time. Text of Order: The motion is granted in part, to the extent

that plaintiffs shall have until December 29, 2010, to effect service on

defendants. The motion is denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs have failed

to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, and this court is not the proper venue for

plaintiffs to challenge the execution of a warrant relating to a pending

federal criminal investigation or proceeding, issued by a judicial officer in

the Middle District of Florida. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya

B. McCafferty. (dae) (Entered: 11/23/2010)

OFFICIALS INCAPACITATED THE PLAINTIFF CORRUPTION VICTIMS

2. Here after years of litigation, and after the Plaintiffs had filed their corruption and

racketeering Complaint (Doc. # 1) against Defendant Government Officials in Florida, the

Tampa F.B.I. incapacitated the Plaintiffs by unlawfully seizing the indisputable proofof


2/18

2

Government crimes and Plaintiffs equipment and files. Here, crooked Defendant Officials

conspired, e.g., to have Plaintiffs files, records, and evidence seized for unlawful purposes

of, e.g.,

a. Disrupting litigation and the service upon the Defendants;b. Cover-up and concealment of Government crimes;c. Extortion of more than $5,000 and Gulf-front Lot 15A, # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A.

F.B.I. RAID WAS PROXIMATE CAUSE OF PLAINTIFFS INCAPACITATION

3. Here, no reasonable and intelligentperson could have possibly denied that said F.B.I. raid

was, e.g.

a. The proximate cause of Plaintiffs incapacitation;b. Rendered the Plaintiff racketeering victims incapable of orderly prosecution;c. Resembled the tactics of dictatorial regimes.

4. Here, Defendants seizure violated Plaintiffs fundamental rights under, e.g., the 1st, 4

th,

14th

, 7th, and 5th U.S. Constitutional Amendments and the Florida Constitution. In

particular, Plaintiffs are clearly entitled to, e.g.:

a. Own property;b. Exclude Government from their Gulf-front Lot 15A;c. Prosecute crooked Officials;d. Redress Government grievances;e. Defend against Government corruption and racketeering;f. Defend against retaliation and extortion of more than $5,000 and Plaintiffs Lot 15A;g. Defend against frivolous Government allegations and false pretenses of frivolity.

DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS & INTERFERENCE TO KEEP PLAINTIFFS AWAY

5. Here, Defendants deliberately and proximately interfered with Plaintiffs ability to

prosecute crooked American Officials for criminal and/or unlawful purposes ofdepriving

the Plaintiffs of theirwell-established most fundamental rights.

RECORD FRAUD ON THE COURT(S)


3/18

3

6. Here, Defendant Officials are keeping the Plaintiff whistleblowers away from their day in

Court. Here, said F.B.I. raid destroyed any opportunity of justice, and this Court should not

shut its eyes and close its ears to said Florida atrocities.

GRAVITY OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION DEMANDS JUDICIAL BALANCE

7. Here, the gravityand harm of public corruption should mitigate any purported failure to

comply with procedural Rules. Fundamental fairness demands that Government

racketeering and corruption not be brushed aside and/or under the carpet of procedural

failure.

THE U.S. SHOULD NOT ABUSE PLAINTIFFSPRO SEAND VICTIM STATUS

8. Just because Plaintiffs are pro se, crooked Government Officials should not be allowed to

abuse their power and victimize Plaintiff whistleblowers. Where there is no fair judge, there

cannotpossibly be any fairness and/or justice.

9. Said MAGISTRATE ORDER appears to compartmentalize and belittle said illegal

circumstances, thereby losing sight of the gravity of fundamental Constitutional and

human rights deprivations in this and the related Cases:

The motion is denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs have failed to comply with

Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, and this court is not the proper venue for plaintiffs to

challenge the execution of a warrant relating to a pending federal criminal

investigation or proceeding, issued by a judicial officer in the Middle District of

Florida.

F.B.I. FILE 316A-TP-73337

10. Plaintiff Government corruption victims had complained about, e.g., Defendant

Government Officials racketeering in Florida, Doc. # 1. Here, the Governmental raid,

F.B.I. file 316A-TP-73337, and seizure of tools essential to litigation was for facially

unlawful purposes of, e.g.:

a. Intimidation of the Plaintiff Government corruption victims;


4/18

4

b. Racketeering and extortion of, e.g., Plaintiffs Gulf-front lands and easements, Lot 15A;c. Extortion of more than $5,000 under false pretenses of frivolity and a purported non-

existent judgment;d. Retaliation and oppression of thepro se Plaintiff whistleblowers.

EXTORTION OF LAND (LOT 15A) AND MONEY; CONSPIRACY

11. Underfraudulent pretenses of, e.g., frivolity, Defendants conspired to extort Gulf-front

Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Lee County, FL, and more than $5,000.00

without anyjustification.

12. Here frivolously and illegally, Lee County claimed private Gulf front easements and lands

in the private Cayo Costa Subdivision on Cayo Costa Island, Lee County, FL, under color of

publicly recorded fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875.

13. Here, Defendant Government Officials conspired to conceal on the public record that, e.g.:

a. No lawmaker could possibly involuntarily divest private land owners without a court

order and/or judicial proceedings;

b. Nolegislatorcouldpossibly transfer Plaintiffs unimpeachable record title to Lot 15A

against their will by illegal means of a legislative act or resolution O.R. 569/875;

c. No Official had any authority to fabricate a fake lot A and block 1, which had never

appeared on the public Cayo Costa Subdivision Plat in Lee County PB 3 PG 25 (1912).

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS AFTER F.B.I. RAID

14. After the unlawful raid by the Tampa F.B.I., Plaintiffs filed the below Motion for Extension

of Time, because said raid incapacitated the Plaintiff whistleblowers [Case No. 8:10-mj-

1416 (AEP)]:


5/18

5

NOV. 7, 2007, TRANSCRIPT OF JUDICIAL FRAUD & CORRUPTION

15. The TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS evidenced,

e.g.:

a. Judicial corruption and fraud in the Middle District of Florida;

b. Judicial andGovernmentracketeering and extortion;

c. Concealment of extortion and fraud scheme O.R. 569/875;

d. Concealment of prima facie Government forgeries lot A and block 1.

See 2:07-cv-228, BUSSE, et al., v. LEE COUNTY, FL, et al.

PROOF OF GOVERNMENT FORGERIES OF, E.G., FAKE lot A AND block 1

This is the document officially published in Lee County [Cayo Costa SubdivisionPlat, Plat Book 3, Page 25] showing to you [Magistrate Polster Chappell] and any factfinder that there never was a lot A and a block 1.

See Page 16 of said Transcript of Corrupted Judicial Proceedings; pages 16 though 20

are attached.

DEF. OFFICIALS COERCED PLAINTIFFS TO REFRAIN FROM PROSECUTION

16. Here in retaliation and response to Plaintiff(s) crushing record evidence of Government

corruption and fraud, Judges John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell conspired with

other Defendants to illegallypunish andsanction the Plaintiff corruption victims.

PUBLISHED COURT CASES / PROOF OF GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION & FRAUD

17. For patently clear and publicly recorded proof of Government fraud and corruption see,

e.g., Cases (Middle District of Florida):

a. 2:2007cv00228;

b. 2:2008cv00899 [removed from State Court by Defendant U.S. Judges];

c. 2:2009cv00041;

d. 2:2010cv00089;

e. 2:2009cv00341;

f. 2:2008cv00364;

g. 2:2010cv00390;


6/18

6

h. 2:2009cv00791;

i. 2:2009cv00602.

Here since 2006, the Plaintiffs had rightfully prosecuted crooked Government Officials in

State and Federal, and respective Appellate Courts. Here particularly, Officials had

conspired to fake an alleged money judgment for illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting money

andland from the Plaintiffs. See, e.g., Case 2:2007cv00228; and Complaint in this Case.

GOVERNMENT COVER-UP, RETALIATION & ILLEGAL SEIZURE IN FLORIDA

18. Here in retaliation and without any probable cause, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,

Tampa, Florida, searched and seized, e.g., Plaintiffs records, computers, camera, and other

equipment essential for Plaintiffs successful litigation and proof of Governmental corruption

in Florida. Here, Officials conspired to cover up Government corruption and fraud and

retaliated against Plaintiff Government corruption victims.

CORRUPT JUDGES/OFFICIALS COVER UP FOR CORRUPT JUDGES IN FLORIDA

19. Here, said search warrant:

a. Originated in said corrupt Court/Government system (Middle District of Florida); b. Was signed by a judicial officer and/or judge presiding over Plaintiffs prosecution of

Defendant fellow Judges for fraud in said corrupt Court (U.S. Magistrate A. E. Porcelli,Tampa);

c. Was yet another fraud on the Court and deliberately deprived Plaintiffs of theirfundamental Federal and Florida Constitutional rights to defend against Government,corruption, oppression, and fraud.

FRAUDULENT AFFIDAVIT(S) FOR RACKETEERING & EXTORTION PURPOSES

20. Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson, Lee County Property Appraiser, conspired with other

Defendants and Officials to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of, e.g., fake lot

A and block 1. See said Cayo Costa Plat, PB 3 PG 25 (1912).


7/18

7

21. By means of INSTRUMENT # 2009000309382, Lee County, FL, Defendant Kenneth M.

Wilkinson concocted a July 29, 2009 judgmentfor unlawful purposes of, e.g., extorting

and/or forcing the sale of Plaintiffs Lot 15A. See attachment.

PLAINTIFFS ENTITLEMENT TO SUE & REDRESS THEIR RECORD GRIEVANCES

22. Under the Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff racketeering victims are entitled to

redress their Government grievances under, e.g., the 1st, 4th, and 14thU.S. Constitutional

Amendments:

a. Without Government intimidation and threats;

b. Without fear of Government retaliation and racketeering;

c. With the use of their illegally seized computer equipment and evidence against the

Defendant Officials.

PUBLICLY RECORDED FRAUD ON THE COURT (MIDDLE DISTRICT, FL)

23. Here in the crooked Middle District of Florida any opportunity of justice has been

impossible, because Judges such as, e.g., John Edwin Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell

corrupted the proceedings by punishing, sanctioning and oppressing the Plaintiffs in

Florida for illegal and/or criminal purposes of coercing them to refrain from further

prosecution.

PLEADINGS BY INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED MAIL TO THIS COURT

24. Pleadings to this Hon. Court were sent by, e.g., International Certified Mail:

RR813156286DE 82062664 6501 231110 1719

RF634919363DE 82061648 9530 221110 1644

RF634918924DE 82061648 8855 161120 1644

RF634918884DE 82061648 8733 151110 1716

RF634918765DE 82061648 8507 121110 1659

RR813144861DE 82061322 6808 091110 1141

This OBJECTION is being mailed by international certified priority mail.


8/18

8

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff victims of Government corruption and fraud respectfully request

1. An order taking judicial notice of Plaintiffs OBJECTION and the Tampa F.B.I. raid,

which incapacitated the Plaintiff Government corruption victims and disrupted this and

other rightful litigation;

2. An orderdirecting the Clerk to issue replacement summons for service;

3. An order enjoining any further racketeering and corruption in said Middle District of

Florida, and in particular, said extortion of Lot 15A and more than $5,000 without any court

order;

4. An ordertaking judicial notice of said fraud on the Courts and racketeering in Florida;

5. An orderdeclaring prima facie fake claim O.R. 569/875 facially unlawful;

6. An orderdeclaring Plaintiffs perfected record ownership of said Lot 15A;

7. An orderdeclaring the conspiracy to extort andforce the sale of said Lot 15A underfalse

pretenses of, e.g., frivolity unlawful and/or criminal;

8. An orderrestraining the Defendant Officials and Tampa FBI from any further obstruction of

justice and illegal intimidation.

/s/Dr. Jorg Busse, Private Attorney General;Victim of Government and judicial corruption in Florida, U.S.A.

/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Private Attorney General;Victim of judicial and Government corruption in Florida, U.S.A.

ATTACHMENTS

Transcript of Corrupted Judicial Proceedings, November 7, 2007,before Crooked Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell

Fraudulent affidavit, instrument # 2009000309382, Lee County, FL

Lot 15A; Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Lee County, Florida

2004 Fax cover, Lee County Dept. of Community Development (Minimum Use Provisions)


9/18


10/18


11/18


12/18


13/18


14/18


15/18


16/18

Tax Year 2010

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number Tax Estimator Tax Bills Print

Owner Of Record

BUSSE JORG +

PRESCOTT JENNIFER F

PO BOX 7651

NAPLES FL 34101

Site Address

ACCESS UNDETERMINED

CAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description

CAYO COSTA

PB 3 PG 25

LOT 15A

Classification / DOR Code

VACANT RESIDENTIAL / 00

[ Viewer ] Tax Map [ Print ]

[ Pictometry Aerial Viewer ]

Property Values (2010 Tax Roll)

Just 25,000

Assessed 25,000

Portability Applied 0

Assessed SOH 25,000

Taxable 25,000

Building 0

Building Features Incl. in bldg value

Land 25,000

Land Features Incl. in land value

SOH Difference 0

Exemptions

Homestead 0

Additional Homestead 0

Widow 0

Widower 0

Disability 0

Wholly 0

Senior 0

Agriculture 0

Attributes

Land Units of Measure LT

Total Number of Land Units 1.00

Frontage 50

Depth 135

Total Number of Buildings 0

Total Bedrooms 0

Total Bathrooms 0

Total Buildings Sq Ft 0

1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Historic District No

TRIM (proposed tax) Notices are available for the following tax years

[ 20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010 ]

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home

Lee County Property Appraiser

Property Data for Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A

Taxing Authorities

Sales / Transactions

Parcel Numbering History

Solid Waste (Garbage) Roll Data

Elevation Information

Appraisal Details

11/8/2010 Lee County Property Appraiser - Onlin

leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx? 1/1


17/18


18/18

Notice of Objection, nh 7

Documents

Transcript of Notice of Objection, nh 7