Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

20
By: Christine Devlin (WVU) Enya Messersmit h (WVU) Caitlin Rose (Texas) Meredith Donaldson (OU) NOTHING TO LOL ABOUT: DIGITAL NATIVES AND THE EFFECTS OF TEXTING

description

The following is a student presentation from the Summer 2012 "Media Psychology and Influence" course taught as part of the SPICE Study Abroad program at Universitat Erfurt. In this course, students were asked to propose a theoretically- and practically-relevant research model about one facet of media psychology and communication. Read more about SPICE: http://www.uni-erfurt.de/kommunikationswissenschaft/studium/bachelor-kommunikationswissenschaft/spice/ABSTRACT: Digital technology has become a common channel for communication. This paper proposes the need to further study the long-term effects of digital technology on digital natives. Research suggests that digital technology has a direct effect on digital natives’ nonverbal communication skill. Two theories that explain the proposed direct effect between digital natives and poor nonverbal skills are the displacement hypothesis and brain development in digital natives. We propose two factors which explain why digital natives are showing a lack of nonverbal capabilities: the usage of text messaging and personality type could influence digital natives’ nonverbal communication skills.

Transcript of Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Page 1: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

By:Christine Devlin (WVU)

Enya Messersmith (WVU)

Caitlin Rose (Texas)

Meredith Donaldson (OU)

NOTHING TO LOL ABOUT: DIGITAL NATIVES AND

THE EFFECTS OF TEXTING

Page 2: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Cellphones are the primary source of communication especially among digital natives

Cellphones limit the amount of nonverbal communication

Diminishing nonverbal skillsDiffi culty maintaining personal and

professional relationships

WHY STUDY DIGITAL NATIVES AND THE EFFECTS OF TEXTING?

Page 3: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Nonverbal skills are affected by more than just textingPersonalityUsage

IT’S NOT THAT SIMPLE

Page 4: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Who are digital natives? People who are born into the digital world (Prensky,

2011). native speakers

Nonverbal Communication The various ways people communicate without

language i.e. eye behavior, touch, body movement, facial expressions.

Nonverbal communication is a learned skill (Riggio, 2006).

DIGITAL NATIVES & NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION

Page 5: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Why are digital natives showing a lack of nonverbal skills?

2 theories

1. Displacement hypothesis

2. Brain Development

DIMINISHED NONVERBAL ABILITIES

Page 6: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Definition Schramm studied children and television More time spent w? activity A = less time spent w/

activity B

Displacing FtF communication w/ digital comm. Nonverbal communication is a skill

Practice=perfect

DISPLACEMENT HYPOTHESIS

Page 7: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Mullen neural pathways necessary in the development of

interpersonal skills = unstimulated and underdeveloped

Small & Vorgan: Ibrain digital technology is rewiring our brain and altering how we

behave Altered behavior- learning differently Focus on technological skills NOT fundamental social skills

Iacoboni: Mirror neurons Neural network Nonverbal cues Developed w/ FtF experience

DEVELOPMENT

Page 8: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

H1: Digital natives have deficient nonverbal communication skills.

What’s the problem?Not every digital native lacks nonverbal communication. Why are some digital natives able to pick up on nonverbal cues better than others?

PersonalityAccess to mobile phone usage

HYPOTHESIS

Page 9: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Personality predicts nonverbal abilityExtroversion

Enjoy human interactionTalkative, enthusiastic, assertive, outgoing

Introversionkeep to themselves, less outspoken

MODERATING EFFECT OF PERSONALITY

Page 10: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Extroverts are better communicatorsExtroverts display less communication

apprehensionCommunication Apprehension (CA)

Defined (Introverts)“Broadly based anxiety related to oral communication” (McCroskey, 1970)

Level of fear associated with real or anticipated communication with another person

Leads to avoidance behaviors, social isolation

EXTROVERTS

Page 11: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Extroverts tend to have more friendsExtroverts spend more time in face-to-face communication

Therefore extroverts practice nonverbal skills more often than introverts

EXTROVERTS VS INTROVERTS AND THEIR BEHAVIORS

Page 12: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

H2: Digital natives who are more extroverted have better nonverbal communication skills.

People who have extroverted personalities are likely to have more friends which allows them more opportunity to practice their nonverbal communication skills.

HYPOTHESIS

Page 13: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

The amount of texts influence NV communication

Digital Natives who text more frequently lose time that could be spent on face to face communication

USAGE OF TEXTING

Page 14: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Defined Cue Lean

Texts lack nonverbal signalsHistory

Designed for task, used as social One does not need NV for task based communication (it

actually gets in the way) however, texting is now used as a social communication

“I was a young engineer working on new communications technologies. We thought texting was a clever way for a company's staff to send simple messages to one another. I'd never have predicted that it would spread into the consumer world and become what it is today. At the time it didn't seem like a big deal” (Silver, 2011).

SMS

Page 15: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Digital Natives prefer texting The number of texts being sent is on the rise, especially

among teenagers age 13 to 17. According to Nielsen, the average teenager now sends 3,339 texts per month. (Parr, 2010)

"I think that's pretty bad because I think when these kids grow up and it's time to form their permanent relationships, they're not going have any idea how to communicate with another person. No idea. They're going be texting their spouses from diff erent rooms," said a worried Virginia mom

Cost effi cient and more convenient

MORE TEXTING LESS FACE TO FACE

Page 16: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

H3: Digital Natives who text more will have decreased ability for NV skills

Even Psychiatrist Dr. Lise Van Susteren agrees that texting is an emotionless thing. (The Money Times, 2012)

The more a digital native texts predicts a decrease in the amount of face to face communication which will then decrease the suffi ciency of their NV skills

HYPOTHESIS

Page 17: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

Use of text messaging is a function of how accessible it is

Different phone plans offer varying degrees of accessibility

Unlimited plans see more texting

UNLIMITED TEXT MESSAGING PLAN

Page 18: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

H4: Digital natives with an unlimited text messaging plan will send more text messages .

HYPOTHESIS

Page 19: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

SUMMARY

Page 20: Nothing to LOL About: Digital Natives and the Effects of Texting

THEORETICAL MODEL