DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 364 444 SO 023 253

AUTHOR Bjerstedt, Ake, Ed.

TITLE Peace/War Issues from a Psychological Perspective. ASelective Bibliography. Revised.

INSTITUTION Lund Univ. (Sweden). Malmo School of Education.

PUB DATE 93

NOTE 57p.; For earlier edition, see ED 351 253.

PUB TYPE Reference Materials - Bibliographies (131)

EARS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.

DESCRIPTORS *Educational Rest:larch; Foreign Countries;International Education; *Peace; *Psychological

Studies; Psychology; Social Science Research; *War

IDENTIFIERS *Peace Education

ABSTRACTThis bibliography lists publications related to peace

education and the psychological aspects of war and peace. The

publications are from around the world and the majority are written

in English. (DB)

***********************************************************************Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made

from the original document.***********************************************************************

EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION AND DEBATE 98

AKE BJERSTEDT (ED.)

1,

U.S. 0(rARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOft* ol Educational Research end Improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

.1)(This document has 1:4an rsDrOduCI4 isreceived from the person or orparotatIonoricynating

0 MonOr changes have been made to imptovereproduction duality

Points of view ot conic:of staled in this docu-ment do not necessarily feOreaerif officialOERI position or policy

"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

ct

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)"

Peace/war issuesfrom a psychological

(Noperspective

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

2

MSE

.1

1993Published and distributed by:Department of Educational and Psychological Research

School of Education. Box 23501S-200 45 MalmO, Sweden

Printed by:Graphic Systems, Malmo, Sweden

3 BEST COPY AVAILABLE

PEACE/WAR ISSUES FROM APSYCHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

A Selective Bibliography

Editor:Ake Bjerstedt

It is reasonable that you can be more effective and efficient as a peaceeducator, if you have a good knowledge of typical conceptions and otherpsychological prerequisites among the school pupils or other groups youwant to educate or influence. In addition, psychological components areimportant in most conflict and war situations.

In this list examples of publications containing studies or discussionrelated to psychological aspects of war, peace etc. and of peace educationare given. In the 80s many studies dealt with reactions to the nuclear warthreat. The major focus is on materials in English from recent years, withsome examples added from other language areas. A few basic publicationshave been marked with an asterisk (*),

4

4

3

Abrams, H.L. Sources of human instability in the handling of nuclear weap-ons. In: Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences (Ed.). Themedical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress, 1986. Pp. 490-528.

Adams, D. Psychology for peace activists: A new psychology for thegeneration who can abolish war. New Haven, CT: The Advocate Press,1987.

Adams, D. The Seville Statement of Violence and why it is important.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 328-337.

Adler, K.P. Western European and American public opinion on peace,defence, and arms control in a cross-national perspective. InternationalSocial Science Journal, 1986, 38(4), 589-600.

Adorno, T.W. et al. The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper,1960.

Alger, C.F. Creating global visions for peace movements. In: Boulding, E..Brigagao, C. & Clements, K. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder,CO: Westview Press, 1991. Pp. 243-260.

Allen, B.P. Defeating denial: Limited nuclear war and the small worldproblem. Journal of Social Psychology, 1990, 130(5), 693-695.

Allen, J. Nuclear threat as psychopathology: An interview with DavidIngleby. New Ideas in Psychology, 1989, 7(2), 205-216.

Allport, G.W. The role of expectancy. In: Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions thatcause wars. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1950. Pp. 43-48.

*Allport, G.W. The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1954.

Almgren, E. & Gustafsson, E. World citizen responsibility: Assessmenttechniques, developmental studies, material construction, and experi-mental teaching. Educational and Psychological Inteiactions (Malmb,Sweden: School of Education), No. 48, 1974.

Andrekus, N.J. The relationship between early ego strength and adolescentresponses to the threat of nuclear war. (Ph. D.) Berkeley, CA: CaliforniaSchool of Professional Psychology, 1989. 120 pp. (50/07B, p. 3183. 89-12249.)

4

Andreyenkov, V., Robinson, J.P. & Popov, N. News media use and adoles-

cents information about nuclear issues: A Soviet-American comparison.

Journal of Communication, 1989, 39(2), 95-104.

Ankarstrand-Lindstrom, G. Framtidsperspektiv i gymnasieundervisningen:

NAgra skelförstik pa temat "Fred i framtidenr. /Future-oriented

teaching in the upper-secondary school: Exploring "Peace in the

future?"./ Pedagogiska hjdlpmedel (Malmo, Sweden: School of Edu-

cation), No. 36, 1984.

Ankarstrand-Lindstrom, G. & Bjerstedt, A. KArnvapen och upprustning:

En attitydstudie bland svenska lärarkandidater. /Nuclear arms and the

arms race: An attitude study among Swedish teacher students./ Siirtryck

och smdtryck, No. 565, 1987.

Ardila, R. The psychological impact of the nuclear threat on the Third

World: The case of Colombia. International Journal of Mental Health.

1986, 15, 162-171.

Arias, R., Soifer, R. & Wainer, A. Disavowal of the danger of nuclear war:

Effect of cultural factors on mental attitudes. International Review of

Psycho-Analysis, 1990, / 7(1), 89-95.

Arnold, D.L. A study of attitudes toward war and peace of pupils in fifth

and sixth grades. (Ph. D.) The Ohio State University, 1938.

Asprea, A.M. et al. The conceptualization of war in children. (Paper.)

Tokyo: International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development,

1987.

Austin, W.G. & Worchell, S. (Eds.) The social psychology of intergroup

relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979.

Axelrod, L.J. & Newton, J.W. Preventing nuclear war: Beliefs and attitudes

as predictors of disarmist and deterrentist behavior. Journal of Applied

Social Psychology, 1991, 21(1), 29-40.

Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

Bachman, J.G. How American high school seniors view the military:

1976-1982. Armed Forces and Society, 1983, 10, 86-104.

Bakan, D. Some philosophical propadeutics toward a psychology of war.

In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace: The image of

the enemy. New York: Plenum Press, 1991. Pp. 41-58.

6

5

Bandura, A., Underwood, B. & Fromson, M.E. Disinhibition of aggressionthrough diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims.Journal of Research in Personality, 1975, 9, 253-269.

Barbera, M.R. The experiences of nuclear peace activists. (Ph.D.) NewYork University, 1992. 302 pp. (53/08B, p. 4361. 92-37732.)

Bar-Tal, D. Israel-Palestinian conflict: A cognitive analysis. InternationalJournal of Intercultural Relations, 1990, 14(1), 7-29.

Bauriedl, T. Bilder gegen die Angst: Der ProzeR der AuflOsung vonFeindbildern. In: Vogt, W.R. (Ed.) Mut zum Frieden. Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1990. Pp. 318-333.

Beardslee, W.R. Adolescents and the threat of nuclear war: The evolutionof a perspective. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 1983, 56, 79-91.

Beardslee, W.R. Children's and adolescents' perceptions of the threat ofnuclear war: Implications of recent studies. In: Thc medical implicationsof nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986. Pp.413-434. (a)

Beardslee, W.R. Perceptions of the threat of nuclear war: Research andprofe,sional implications. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 242-252. (b)

Belden, G.B. A study to determine if ten-year-olds can develop an activeconceptualization of peace as reconciliation. (Ph. D.) The Florida StateUniversity, 1972. 148 pp. (33/05A, p. 2231. 72-27902.)

Beresin, A.R. Toy war games and the illusion of two-sided rhetoric. Play &Culture, 1989, 2(3), 218-224.

Berger Gold, B., Moon, S. & Van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared?The psychological effect of the nuclear threat on children. New York:Open Books, 1986.

Bergstrom, A. & Hohnborg, P.-0. Vad tanker och kanner barn och ung-dom inför fitombombshot och kapprustning? /What do children andyoung people think and feel about nuclear weapons and the arms race?/Stockholm: Foreningen Svenoka läkare mot kärnvapen, 1984.

Bernstein, J.S. Power and politics: The psychology of Soviet-Americanpartnership. Boston, MA: Shambala Publications, 1989.

'7

6

Bernstein, M. Coping with serious threat: Conflict theory and the decisionto support alternatives to the nuclear arms race. (Ph. D.) New Haven,CT: Yale University, 1985. 148 pp. (47/06, P. 2669. 86-12943.)

Biggers, P.J. The development and analysis of normative instrumentswhich assess pre-adult cognitive and attitudinal orientations to selectedwar and peace concepts. (Ph. D.) Tallahassee, FL: Florida State Uni-versity, 1972. 245 pp. (33/10A, p. 5402. 73-10321.)

Billesbolle, P. et al. Borns angst for krig med kernevaben. /The anxiety ofchildren related to nuclear war./ Ugeskrift for lager, 1986, 148, 731-734.

Birrer, I.J. A multiple continua theory of attitudes toward war and peace.(Ph. D.) Clark University, 1947. 171 pp.

Bjerstedt, A. Reduction of "barrier tendencies" during experience ofinternational co-living: Psychological control studies of certain aspects inthe CISV socio-educational approach. Acta psychologica, 1958, 13,329-346.

Bjerstedt, A. A study of dyadic communication in international settings. In:Glimpses from the world of the school child. New York: Beacon House,1960. Pp. 87-127. (a)

Bjerstedt, A. "Ego-involved world-mindedness", nationality images, andmethods of research. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1960, 4, 185-192.(b)

Bjerstedt, A. Informational and non-informational determinants of na-tionality stereotypes. The Journal of Social Issues, 1962, 18, 24-29.

Bjerstedt, A. Explorations of enemy images using an associative technique.Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 95, 1989.

Bjerstedt, A. Conceptions of the future and education for responsibility.Peace Education Reports, No. 4, 1992.

Bjerstedt, A. et al. Enemy images among university students in four coun-tries: A cross-national exploration using an associative technique. Peace,Environment and Education, 1991, 2(3), 13-31.

Bjerstedt, A. & Gustafsson, E. (Eds.) Towards peace education: Abstractson some reports related to conflict resolution and peace education, 1976-1986. Pedagogisk dokumentation (Malmii, Sweden: School of Education),No. 83, 1986.

7

Bjurwill, C. Framtidsforestallningar: Analys adz tolkning av 900 ele-vers uppsatser och semantiska skattningar. /Conceptions of the future:Analysis and interpretations of 900 pupils free writings and semanticdifferentials./ (Studia psychologica et paedagogica, 84.) Malmo: Liber,1986.

Blackwell, P.L. & Gessner, J.C. Fear and trembling: An inquiry intoadolescent perceptions of living in the nuclear age. Youth and Society,1983, 15, 237-255.

Blight, J.G. Toward a policy-relevant psychology of avoiding nuclear war:Lessons for psychologists from the Cuban missile crisis. American Psy-chologist, 1987, 42(1), 12-29.

Blinnika, L.M. Personal, national and global image of the future in adult-hood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1987, 28(1), 35-41.

Bloom, W. Personal identity, national identity and international relations.Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge Univer. Pr., 1990.

Blumberg, H.H. Attitude formation and international conflict. Interna-tional and Intercultural Communication Annual, 1990, 14, 56-74.

Blumberg, & French, C.C. (Eds.) Peace: Abstracts of the psycho-logical and behavioral literature 1967-1990. Washington, DC: AmericanPsychological Association, 1992.

Boehnke, K. The status of psychological peace research in East Germanyand West Germany in a time of change. Political Psychology, 1992,13(1), 133-144.

Boehnke, K. et .al. Leben unter atomarer Bedrohung zur Bedeutungexistentieller Angste im Jugendalter. Gruppendynamik, 1988, 19, 429-452.

Boehnke, K. et al. How West German adolescents experience the nuclearthreat. Political Psychology, 1989, 10(3), 419-443.

Boehnke, K. & Frindte, W. Report on the 2nd Internaional Symposium inContributions of Psychology to Peace. International Journal of Psy-chology, 1992, 27, 258-260.

Boehnke, K., von Fromberg, E. & Macpherson, M.J. Makro-sozialer Stressirn Jugendalter: Ergebnisse einer Wiederbefragung zu Kriegsangst undAngst vor Umweltzerstorung. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinder-psychiatrie, 1991, 40(6), 204-213.

9

8

Boone, R. Children's conceptions of conventional and nuclear war. (Ph. D.)California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles, 1985.(46/08B, p. 2796. 85-22839.)

Boone, R. et al. Psychological effects of nuclear developments. LosAngeles: California State Psychological Association Task Force on Psy-chologists for Social Responsibility, 1983.

Borg, A., Hultman, E. & Waern, Y. Conflict resolution and social under-standing in six to twelve year old boys. Rep. Dep. Psychol., Univer.Stockholm, No. 481, 1976.

Borgenicht, L. Threat in the nuclear age: Children's responses to thenuclear arms debp,te. School Psychology International, 1985. 6, 187-193.

Bosowski, E.P. Two comparative studies of student views of the world.(Paper.) Upper Montclair, NJ: Middle States Division of the Asso-ciation of American Geographers, 1982.

Boughton, R.C. et al. Australian children and the threat of nuclear war.The Medical Journal of Australia, 1987, 147, 121-124.

Boulding, E. The child and nonviolent social change. In: Charny, I.W.(Ed.) Strategies against violence. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1978.Pp. 68-99.

Boulding, E. Perspectives of women researchers on disarmament, nationalsecurity and world order. Women Studies International Quarterly, 1981,4, 27-40.

Boulding, E. Two cultures of religion as obstacles to peace. Zygon Journalof Religion and Science, 1986, 2 /(4), 501-518.

Boulding, E. Image and action in peace building. Journal of Social Issues,1988, 44(2), 17-37.

Boulding, K.E. National images and international systems. Journal of Con-flict Resolution, 1959, 3, 120-131.

Boulding, K.E. The nature and causes of national and military self-imagesin relation to peace and war. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S. (Eds.) Thepolitical geography of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991.Pp. 142-152.

1 0

9

Bradley, M. Psychological processes increasing the risks of accidentalnuclear war. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologistsfor Peace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp.

155-167.

Brandon, K. Nonviolent action for social change: Its effects on activists.

(Ed. D.) University of Massachusetts, 1986. 251 pp. (47/03A, p. 753.

86-12019.)

Braunstein, Al. Nuclear anxiety: A test construction study. (Ph. D.) Uni-

versity of Miami, Florida, 1986, (47/11B, p. 4642. 87-06471.)

Brockett, C.D. A Kohlbergian approach to international distribution justice:A comparison of the shared humanity and interdependence perspectives.Political Psychology, 1986, 7(2), 349-367.

Brockner, J. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology of conflict escalation andentrapment. New York: Springer, 1985.

Brock-Utne, B. Feminist perspectives on peace and peace education. Ox-ford: Pergamon Press, 1989,

Brock-Utne, B The raising of a peaceful boy. Peace, Environment andEducation, 1991, 2(1), 3-12.

Bronfenbrenner, U. The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations, In:White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. NewYork: New York University Press, 1986. Pp. 71-81.

Bronstein, P.A. & Quina, K. (Eds.) Teaching a psychology of peopleResources for gender and sociocultural awareness. Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association, 1988.

Brown, B.R. & Rubin, J.Z. The social psychology of bargaining and nego-tiation. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Brown, S. The causes and preve;tion of war. New York: St. Martin'sPress, 1987.

Buban, M.E. et al Children's fears of nuclear war: Group interventionstrategies. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1988, 13(3), 124-129.

Budzinski, M. et al. Ausländer: Argumente gegen alltdgliche VorurtetleTiibingen: Verein fiir Friedenspadagogik, 1982.

Bum, S.M. & Oskamp, S. Ingroup biases and the U.S.-Soviet conflict.Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 73-89.

1 1

10

Burstermann, J.P. & Noar, G. Let's listen to our children and youth. In:Henderson, G. (Ed.) Education for peace. Washington, DC: ASCD, 1973.Pp. 63-88.

BUttner, C. Kriegsangst bei Kindern. Miinchen: Kosel-Verlag, 1982.

Buttner, C. Children's war fantasies. Journal of Psychohistory, 1983, 10,491-510.

Bilttner, C. Kinder und Krieg: Zum pddagogischen Umgang mit Haft undFeindseligkeit. Mainz: Grilnewald, 1991.

Caldicott, H. Missile envy: The arms race and nuclear war. New York:Morrow, 1984.

Canning, W.S. Channels of communication in the formation of Catholic andnon-Catholic studer- orientations toward war and peace. (Ed. D.)East Texas State University, 1977. 175 pp. (38/11A, p. 6490. 78-05462.)

Cantor, J., Wilson, B.J. & Hoffner, C. Emotional responses to a televisednuclear holocaust film. Communication Research, 1986, 13(2), 257-277.

Cantril, H. (Ed.) Tensions that cause wars. Urbana, IL: University ofIllinois Press, 1950.

Cantril, H., Buchanan, W. et al. How nations see each other. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press, 1953.

Carlander, M. Konflikter och konfliktbearbetning: En idéskrift for hem-met, fOrskolan, skolan, fritidshemmet och foreningslivet. /Conflicts andconflict resolution./ Pedagogiska hidlpmedel (Malmo, Sweden: School ofEducation), No. 40, 1989.

Carlsson-Paige, N. & Levin, D.E. Young children and war play. Educa-tional Leadership, 1987/88, 45(4), 80-84.

Cela, E.P. Psicologia e nonviolerza. Torino: Edizioni Gruppo Abele, 1991.

Chandler, M.A. Developing a measure of nuclear war anxiety: A factoranalytic study. i lumboldt Journal of Social Relaticns, 1991, 16(2), 39-63.

Chelcea, S. & Dragomirescu, I. Peace in the value system of youngworkers. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psychologie),1988, 32(2), 113-117.

12

11

Children's fears of war: Hearing before the Select Committee on Children,Youth, and Families. Washington, DC: U.S. Government PrintingOffice, 1983.

Chilstrorn, G.A. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms race. Journal ofHumanistic Psychology, 1984, 24(3), 39-54.

Chilstrorn, G.A. The nuclear arms threat: Psychosocial correlates of atti-tudes and behavioral response. (Ph. D.) San Diego, CA: CaliforniaSchool of Professional Psychology, 1985. (46/08B, P. 2800. 85-17925.)

Chimienti, G., Nasr, J.A. & Kalifeh, I. Children's reactions to war-related stress: Affective symtoms and behaviour problems. Social Psy-chiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1989, 24(6), 282-287.

Chivian, E. et al. Soviet children and the threat of nuclear war. AmericanJournal of Orthopsychiatry, 1985, 55, 484-502.

Chivian, E. et al. American and Soviet teenagers' concerns about nuclearwar and the future. New England Journal of Medicine, 1988, 319, 407-413.

Christiansen, B. Attitudes towards foreign affairs as a function of per-sonality. Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1959.

Christie, D.J. & Nelson, L. Student reactions to nuclear education. Bulletinof the Atomic Scientists, 1988, 44(6), 22-23.

Clark, A.W., Trahair, R.C. & Graetz, B.R. Social Darwinism: A determi-nant of nuclear arms policy and action. Human Relations, 1989, 42, 289-303.

Coffey, J.I. & Dieter, Jr., A.T. Perceptions of threats and arms races: Aresearch report. In: Unescos yearbook on peace and conflict studies,1983. Paris: Unesco, 1985. Pp. 42-73.

Cohen, S.P. et al. Evolving intergroup techniques for conflict resolution:An Israeli-Palestinian pilot workshop. Journal of Social Issues, 1977,33(1), 165-189.

Conn, S.A. Protest and thrive: The relationship between global responsi-bility and personal empowerment. New England Journal of PublicPolicy, 1990, 6(1), 163-177.

Couper, P. The development of the concept of war. Journal of PeaceResearch, 1965, 2, 1-16.

13

12

Cottam, M.L. Cognitive limitations and foreign policy decision making.(Ph. D.) University of California, Los Angeles, 1983. 426 pp. (4415A, p.1565. 83-21962.)

Crabb, P.B. & Rosnow, R.L. What is aggressive! Some contextual factorsin judging international behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 1988, / 4(2),105-1.2.

Cretu, T. Peace and its most obvious meanings in preschool children'sdrawings. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Série de Psychologie),1988, 32(1), 97-99.

Criss, J.E. Patriarchal structures and the acceptance of war and peace: Thevalues of dominance, competitive-hierarchy, instrumentalism andmasculinity. (Ph. D.) California School of Professional Psychology LosAngeles, 1990. 155 pp. (51-11B, p. 5570. 91-09012.)

Cross, T.P. & Saxe, L. The Day After: Report of a survey of effects ofviewing and beliefs about nuclear war. (Paper.) Toronto: AmericanPsychological Association, 1984.

Davidson, J.A. & Newman, M. Australian perceptions of the nuclear armsrace: A conflict of :nterests or a misunderstanding? Australian Psy-chologist, 1990, 25(1), 15-24.

Davies, R. Children and the threat of nuclear war. Lancaster, UK: Centrefor Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1984.

Davies, R. Hopes and fears: Children's attitudes to nuclear war. Lancaster,UK: Centre for Peace Studies, S. Martin's College, 1987.

Dematos, F.G. Conceptions of peace of Brazilian high-school students.International Journal of World Peace, 1991, 8(3), 65-67.

Der-Karabetian, A. World-mindedness and the nuclear threat: A multi-national study. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 1992, 7, 293-308.

Der-Karabetian, A. et al. Parental anti-nuclear activism and children'sresponse to the nuclear threat. (Paper.) Long Beach, CA: Western Psy-chological Association, 1987.

Deschamps, J.-C. & Brown, R. Superordinate goals and intergroup con-flict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1983, 22, 189-195.

Deutsch, K.W. Nationalism and its alternatives. New York: Knopf, 1969.

14

13

Deutsch, M. Socially relevant science: Reflections on some studies of inter-personal conflict. American Psychologist, 1969, 24, 1076-1092.

Deutsch, M. The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructiveprocesses.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.

Deutsch, M. Conflict resolution: Theory and practice. Political Psychology.1983, 4 , 431-453. (a)

Deutsch, M. The prevention of World War III: A psychological perspec-tive. Political Psychology, 1983, 4(1), 3-31. (b)

Deutsch, M. Educating beyond hate. Peace, Environment and Education,1991, 3(4), 3-19.

Deutsch, M. Subjective features of conflict resolution: Psychological, socialand cultural influences. In: Vayrenen, R. (Ed.) New directions in conflicttheory. London: Sage, 1991. Pp. 26-56.

Deutsch, M. & The Project "Preparedness for Peace". Peace education: Co-operative learning, conflict resolution training, and the use of con-structive controversy. Reprints and Miniprints, No. 671, 1989.

Diamond, G. & Bachman, J. High school senion and the nuclear threat,1975-1984. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 210-241.

Diamond, G. & Bachman, J.G. Nuclear despair and nuclear concern amongU.S. high school seniors and recent graduates. (Paper.) San Fransisco,CA: International Society of Political Psychology, 1987.

Dieckmann, H. Gedanken iiber den Begriff des "Feindbildes". AnalytischePsychologie, 1986, / 7(1), 25-37.

Dinklage, R. I. American and German children's perception of war andpeace: A photo-communication approach. (Ph. D.) Gainesville, FL: Uni-versity of Florida, 1986. 184 pp. (47/05A, P. 1633. 86-18626.)

Dinklage, R.I. & Ziller, R.C. Explicating cognitive conflict through photo-communication: The meaning of war and peace in Germany and theUnited States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1989, 33, 309-317.

Doctor, R.M. et al. Self-reports of Soviet and American children on worryabout the threat of nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 13-23,

Doctor, R.M. et al. Freeing college students from hopelessness: Preliminaryresults. The Peace Psychology Bulletin, 1992, 1(3), 23-25.

4

14

Doctor, R.M., Goldenring, J.M. & Powell, A. Adolescents' attitudesabout nuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1987, 60, 599-614.

Dodds, J. & Lin, C. Chinese teenagers' concerns about the future: A cross-national comparison. Adolescence, 1992, 27, 481-486.

Doob, L. W. Patriotism and nationalism: Their psychological foundation,N.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.

Druckman, D. (Ed.) Negotiations: S ocial psychological perspectives.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1977.

Druckman, D. The social psychology of arms control and reciprocation.Political Psychology, 1990, 11(3), 553-581.

Dugan, C. The political socialization of five women who teach peacestudies. (Ph. D.) Drew University, 1991. 402 pp. (52/12, p. 4490A. 92-13366.)

Dyal, J.A. & Morris, P. Issue salience, nuclear anxiety, and mental health.(Paper.) Hamilton, Canada: Canadian Peace Research and EducationAssociation, 1987.

Dyal, J.A., Morris, P. & McKenzie-Mohr, D. Nuclear anxiety and issue-relevant behavior: Associations with mental health. Journal of SocialBehavior and Personality, 1990, 5(5), 243-262.

Early-Adams, P. et al. Coping in the nuclear age: The practitioner's role.Families in Society, 1990, 71(9), 558-562.

Easlea, B. Fathering the unthinkable: Masculinity, scientists and the nucleararms race. London: Pluto Press, 1983.

Eckhardt, W. Attitudes of Canadian peace groups. Journal of ConflictResolution, 1972, 16, 341-352. (a)

Eckhardt, W. Crosscultural theories of war and aggression. InternationalJournal of Group Tensions, 1972, 2(3), 36-51. (b)

Eckhardt, W. War/Peace attitudes, events and values. Bulletin of PeaceProposals, 1983, 14, 187-189.

Eckhardt, W. Making and breaking enemy images. Bulletin of Peace Pro-posals, 1991, 22(1), 87-95.

Eckhardt, W. & Alcock, N.Z. Ideology and personality in war/peace atti-tudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 1970, 81(1), 105-116.

116

15

Eckhardt, W. & Lentz, T.F. Factors of war/peace attitudes. Peace ResearchReviews, 1967, 1(5). /Rev. ed., 1971.1

Edwards, T.C. & Oskamp, S. Components of antinuclear war activism.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1992, 13(2), 217-230.

Ehrlich, P.R. et al. The cold and the dark: The world after nuclear war.New York: Norton, 1984.

Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. Krieg und Frieden aus der Sicht der Verhaltens-forschung. (2. Aufl.) Munchen: Piper, 1984.

Elsässer, G. Forsvarsvilja och framtidstro. /Attitudes to the defence and tothe future./ Stockholm: The National Board for Psychological Defence,1987.

Elworthy, S. The assumptions behind nuclear weapons decisions and ourrole in changing them. In: Nakarada, R. & Oberg, J. (Eds.) Survivingtogether. Lund, Sweden: LUPRI, 1989. Pp. 19-29.

Engestrdm, Y. War in the imagination of Finnish school children. CurrentResearch on Peace and Violence (Tampere Peace Research Institute),1978, I , 91-103.

English, R.D. & Halperin, J.J. The other side: How Soviets and Americansperceive each other. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, 1987.

Ensel, F.-J. Richtige Angst und falsche Furcht: Psychologische Friedens-vorbereitung und der Beitrag der Pädagogik. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer,1984.

Erikson, E.H. Pseudospeciation in the nuclear age. Political Psychology,1985, 6, 213-217.

Escalona, S.K. Growing up with the threat of nuclear war. American Jour-nal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 600-607.

Etzioni, A. Social-psychological aspects of international relations. In:Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology.(2nd ed.) Vol. 5. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969. Pp. 538-601.

Evan, W.M. The arms race and nuclear war. Englewood Cliffs, NJ-Prentice-Hall, 1987.

Falk, A. & Selg, H. Die Begriffe "Krieg" und "Frieden" in der Vorstellungvon Kindern und Jugendlichen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unter-richt, 1982, 29, 353-358.

17

16

Falk, R.A. & Lifton, R.J. Indefensible weapons: The political and psycho-logical case against militarism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.

Fenton, I. (Ed.) The psychology of nuclear conflict. London: Coventure,1986.

Fernald, M.C. Hope, connectedness, and action: Responses af adolescentsand young adults to the threat of nuclear W.f. (Ph. D.) Chapel Hill,NC: University of North Carolina, 1985. 79 pp. (46/11B, p. 4010.85-27197.)

Feshbach, S. Psychology, human violence, and the search for peace: Issuesin science and human values. Journal of Social Issues, 1990, 46(1). 33-198.

Feshbach, S., Kandel, E. & Haist, F. Attitudes toward nuclear armamentpolicies: An example of social research in behalf of social advocacy.Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 107-126.

Finison, L.J. The Society for the Psychological Studies of Social Issues,peace action, and theories of conflict: 1936-1950. American Psycholo-gist, 1983, 38, 1250-1252.

Fischer, P.A. The effect of self-confrontation instruction on students' valuepriorities and attitude toward war and peace. New York: FordhamUniversity, 1984. 250 pp. (45/01A, p. 123. 84-09256.)

Fischer, R.J. Third party consultation as a method of intergroup conflictresolution: A review of studies. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1983, 27,301-334.

Fisher, R. & Ury, W. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreements withoutgiving in. Boston. MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1981.

Fiske, S.T. People's reactions to nuclear war: Implications for psychol-ogists. American Psychologist, 1987, 42, 207-217.

Fiske, S.T., Pratto, F. & Pavelchak, M.A. Citizens' images of nuclear war:Content and consequences. Journal of Social Issues, 1983, 39(1), 42-65.

Flohr, A.K. Feindbilder in der internationalen Politik: litre Entstehung undihre Funktton. Minster: Lit-Verlag, 1991.

Flordh, C., Westin, C. & Wilhelmson, L. Fredsforskning ur psykologisksynvinkel en litteraturöversikt. /Peace research from a psychologicalperspective. A review of literature./ Stockholm: Pedagogiska institu-tionen, 1967.

17

Fogg, R.W. Some effects of teaching adolescents some creative, peacefulapproaches for resolving international conflicts. (Ed. D.) Cambridge,MA: Harvard University, 1972. 359 pp. (33/08A, p. 4054. 72-31050.)

Fogg, R.W. Dealing with conflict: A repertoire of creative, peacefulapproaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1985, 29, 330-358.

Folberg, J. & Taylor, A. Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1984.

Fox, D.L. & Schofield, J.W. Issue salience, perceived efficacy and per-ceived risk: A study of the origins of anti-nuclear war activity.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, 19(10), 805-827.

Fox-Cardamone, D.L. The exper;mental precursors of antinuclear activism:Attitudes, subjective norms and efficacy. (Ph. D.) Miami University,1990. 129 pp. (51-11B, p. 5637. 91-10459.)

Frank, J.D. Emotional and motivational aspects of the disarmamentproblem. Journal of Social Issues, 1961, / 7(3), 20-27.

Frank, J.D. Sanity and survival in the nuclear age: Psychological aspects ofwar and peace. New York: Random House, 1982.

Frank, J.D. Nuclear arms and prenuclear leaders: Sociopsychological as-pects of the nuclear arms race. Political Psychology, 1983, 4, 393-408.

Frank, J.D. Prospects for world peace: Sociopsychological consideration.American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1985, 5(2), 11-16.

Frank, J.D. Psychological responses to the threat of nuclear annihilation.International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 65-71.

Frank, J.D. The drive for power and conceptual inertia. Journal of theAmerican Academy of Psychoanalysis, 1989, / 7, 347-357.

Frank, J.D. & Melville, A.Y. The image of the enemy and the process ofchange. In: Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough:Emerging new thinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 199-208.

Frank, J.D. & Rivard, J.C. Antinuclear admirals: An interview study.Political Psychology, 1986, 7(1), 23-52.

Frankenhaeuser, M. Human fallibility and the risk of nuclear war by mis-take. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists forPeace. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp. 10-21.

19

18

Frankenhaeuser, M. To err is human: Nuclear war by mistake? In:Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emerging newthinking. New York: Walker, 1988. Pp. 53-60.

Fredsarbete under förintelsehot. /Peace work during t" ireat of annihilation./(Special issue of:) Kritisk Psykologi, 1985, 40(3-4).

Freeman, J. Adolescent attitudes to nuclear war. International Journal ofAdolescence & Youth, 1991, 2(4), 237-244.

Frei, D. Risks of unintentional nuclear war. Totowa, NJ: Allanheld,Osmun, 1983.

French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: An annotatedbibliography. Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 1984, 2, 247-273.

French, C.C. Psychological aspects of the nuclear arms threat: Annotatedbibliography update, I-IV. Psychological Reports, 1989, 65, 403-425,1099-1119, 1299-1322; 1990, 66, 71-93.

French, P.L. & van Hoorn, J. Half a nation saw nuclear war and nobodyblinked? Reassessment of the impact of The Day After in terms of a theo-retical chain of causality. Internat;onal Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 276-297.

Freud, S. Why war? In: Strachey, J. (Ed.) Collected papers by SigmundFreud, Vol. 5. London: The Hogarth Press, 1950. Pp. 273-287.

Frindte, W. Der Friede beginnt auch in den K6pfen: Padagogische und psy-chologische Aspekte der Friedensfähigkeit. In: Entmilitarisierung? Ber-lin: Brandenburgisches Verlagshaus, 1990. Pp. 251-268.

Fromm, E. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rine-hart & Winston, 1973.

Fry, D.P. Respect for the rights of others is peace Learning aggressionversus nonaggression among the Zapotec. American Anthropologist,1992, 94, 621-639.

Fuld, K. & Nevin, J.A. Why doesn't everyman work to prevent nuclearwar? A decision theory analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1988, /8(1), 59-65.

Galperin, M., Holt, R.R. & Howells, P. What Soviet emigre adolescentsthink about nuclear war. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 1-12.

c-

19

Galtung, J. Schooling, education, and the future. Didakometry & Socio-metry, 1982, 14(1-2).

Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K. & Dubrow, N. What children can tell us aboutliviro in danger. American Psychologist, 1991, 46(4), 376-383.

Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup and interna-tional understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956.

Gilbert, R.K. The dynamics of inaction: Psychoiogical factors inhibitingarms control activism. American Psychologist, 1988, 43, 755-764.

Gildemeister, J. (Ed.) Psychologists for Social Responsibility: Researchdirectory. Washington, DC: Psychologists for Sociai Responsibility,1991.

Gillies, P. A longitudinal study of the hopes and worries of adolescents.Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 69-81.

Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychological dimensions of war. London: Sage, 1990.

Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. California adolescents' concerns aboutthe threat of nuclear war. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of thethreat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW,1985. Pp. 112-133.

Goldenring, J.M. & Doctor, R.M. Teen-age worry about nuclear war:North American and European questionnaire studies. International Jour-nal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 72-92.

Goodman, L.A. et al. The threat of nuclear war and the nuclear arms race:Adolescent experience and perceptions. Political Psychology, 1983, 4,510-530.

Goodman, L.M. & Hoff, L.A. Omnicide: The nuclear dilemma. New York:Praeger, 1990.

Gordon, H. Buberian Learning Groups: Existentialist philosophy as anAriadne thread for education for peace. Teachers College Record, 1983,85(1), 73-87. (a)

Gordon, H. Existentialist writings and the enhancing of trust: A methoddeveloped in Buberian Learning Groups. Israel Social Science Research,1983, 1(1), 65-78. (b)

21

')

20

Gordon, H. Dance, dialogue, and despair: Existentialist philosophy andeducation for peace in Israel. University, Alabama: The University ofAlabama Press, 1986.

Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoorn, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared? Thepsychological effect of the nuclear threat on children. New York: OpenBooks, 1986.

Gould, .1. Exploring youth's reaction to the threat of nuclear war. In:Gould, B.B., Moon, S. & van Hoom, J. (Eds.) Growing up scared? NewYork: Open Books, 1986. Pp. 49-56.

Graudenz, I. & Randoll, D. Erleben der atomaren Bedrohung bei jungenErwamsenen: Uberpriifung eines als interkulturell angelegten Frage-bogens. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 1988, 35, 180-187.

Greene, A.S. et al. Attitudes about war: Implications of the war with Iraq.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1991, 15(4), 153-160.

Greenwald, D.S. & Zeitlin, S.J. No reason to talk about it: Familiesconfront the nuclear taboo. New York: Norton, 1987.

Grinspoon, L. (Ed.) The long darkness: Psychological and moral perspec-tives on nuclear winter. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.

Groebel, J. & Hinde, R.A. (Eds.) Aggression and war: Their biological (ndsocial bases. Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Gromyko, A.A. & Hellman, M.E. (Eds.) Breakthrough: Emerging newthinking. New York: Walker & Moscow: Progress Publ., 1988.

Gugel, G. Ausllinder, Aussiedler, Obersiedler: Fremdenfeindlichkeit in derBundesrepublik Deutschland. Tubingen: Verein fur Friedenspadagogik,1990.

Gugel, G. "Ich denke immer an diesen blöden Krieg": Was Sie fiber (lieAngst ihrer Kinder vor Krieg und die Wirkung von Kriegs- und Ge-waltdarstellungen wissen sollten. Tibingen: Verein fur Friedenspada-gogik, 1991.

Guy, K.D. An exploratory study of sixth graders' perceptions of thenuclear presence. (Ed. D.) University of North Dakota, 1987. 748 pp.(48/08A, p. 1978. 87-24416.)

Gopfert, H. Ausliinderfeindlichkeit durch Unterricht. Düsseldorf: Schwann,1985.

21

Haas, J. (Ed.) The anthropology of war. Cambridge, Engl.: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1990.

Haas, M.E. War and peace: The students' views. Journal of Research & De-velopment in Education, 1986, 19(3), 84-89.

Haaveslrud, M. Seminal agents in the acquisition of international orienta-tions among adolescents. (Ph. D.) University of Washington, 1970. 194pp. (31/07B, p. 4312. 71-00974.)

Haavelsrud, M. Views on war and peace among students in West Berlinpublic shoots. Journal of Peace Research, 1970, 7, 99-120.

Haavelsrud, M. Ansichten von Kindern und Jugendlichen fiber Krieg undFrieden. Bildung und Wissenschaft, 1972, 25(3), 29-43.

Hakvoort, I. & Oppenheimer, L. Children and adolescents' conceptions ofpeace, war, and strategies to attain peace: A Dutch case study. Journal ofPeace Research, 1993, 30(1), 65-77.

Hamilton, D.L. & Rose, T.L. Illusory correlation and the maintenance ofstereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychotogy, 1980,39, 832-845.

Hamilton, E.D. Living with the nuclear threat: Psychological reactions andresponses. (Ph. D.) Florida Institute of Technology, 1986. 105 pp.(47/03B, p. 1272. 86-10406.)

Hamilton, S.B. et al. In the eye of the beholder: Accounting for variabilityin attitudes and cognitive/affective reactions toward the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987, 17, 927-952.

Hamilton, S.B. et al. Nuclear war as a snurce of adolescent worry: Rela-tionships with age, gender, trait emotional;ty. and drug use. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1988, 128, 745-763

Hamilton, S.B. et al. Relationships between the life values of U.S. collegestudents and their cognitive/affective responses to the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 55-68.

Hamilton, S.B., Chavez, E.L. & Keilin, W.G. Thoughts of Armageddon:The relationship between nuclear threat attitudes and cognitive/emotionalresponses. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 189-207.

23

22

Hamilton, S.B., Kei lin, W.G. & Knox, T.A. Thinking about the unthink-able: The relationship between death anxiety and cognitive/emotionalresponses to the threat of nuclear war. Omega: Journal of Death andDying, 1987-88, 18(1), 53-61.

Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Kcilin, W.G. The nuclear family: Cor-respondence in cognitive and affective reactions to the threat of nuclearwar among older adolescents and their parents. Journal of Youth &Adolescents, 1986, 15, 133-145. (a)

Hamilton, S.B., Knox, T.A. & Keilin, W.G. Relationship between familysocioeconomic status and cognitive/affective responses to the threat ofnuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, 247-250. (b)

Hare, A.P. & Naveh, D. Creative problem solving: Camp David Summit,1978, Small Group Behavior, 1985, 16(2), 123-138.

Harman, W. How to think about peace (and feel empowered to do some-thing about it). Organization Development Journal, 1986, 4(4), 42-48.

Harris, I.M. The role of social conditioning in male vio):.:nce. In: Boulding,E. et al. (Eds.) Peace culture and society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press,1991. Pp. 166-176.

Harris, R.A., Proshansky, H.M. & Roskin, E. Some attitudes of collegestudents concerning the hydrogen bomb. Journal of Psychology, 1956,42, 29-33.

Harvey, C.B., Howell, D. & Colthorpe, P. Canadian adolescents' concernsin the nuclear age. Canadian Counselor, 1985, 19(2), 53-62.

Haste, H. Everybody's scared but life goes on: Coping, defence and actionin the face of nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 11-26.

Hawkes, G.W. What about the children? The threat of nuclear war and ourresponsibility to preserve this planet for future generations. Moretown,VT: Parents and Teachers for Social Responsibility, 1983.

Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley,1958.

Herman, K.L. Attitudes and reactions to nuclear weapons: Responses to feararousal. (Ph. D.) University of Southern California, 1987. (48/07A, p.1708. Copies from: Micrographics Dept., Doheny Library, USC, LosAngeles, CA 90089-0182.)

2 4;

1

23

Hesse, P. Children's and adolescents' fears of nuclear war: Is our sense ofthe future disappearing? International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 93-113.

Hesse, P. & Mack, J.E. The world is a dangerous place: Images of theenemy on children's television. Cambridge, MA: Center for Psycholog-ical Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.

Hesse, P. & Poklemba, D. The stranger with green feet and black piggytoes: Young children's conceptions of the Inemy. Cambridge, MA:Center for Psychological Studies in the Nuclear Age, 1987.

Hesse, P. & The Project "Preparedness for Peace". Enemy images, develop-mental psychology, and peace education. Peace Education Miniprints,No. 29, 1992.

Hilsberg, B.L. Endorsement of traditional male roles and acceptance of warand peace. (Ph. D.) California School of Professional Psychology LosAngeles, 1989. 175 pp. (50-10B, p. 4817. 89-22978.)

Hinde, R.A. Human aggression: Biological propensities and social forces.In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.) A reader in peacestudies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 172-181.

Hoffman, L.E. American psychologists and wartime research on Germany,1941-1945. American Psychologist, 1992, 47, 264-273.

Hofmann, C. (Ed.) Die Kinder, der Krieg "nd die Angst. Ravensburg:Ravensburger Verlag, 1991.

Ho Ilin, C.R. Concern about the threat of nuclear war: Just another worry?Anxiety Research, 1991, 4(1), 51-60,

Holmberg, P.O. & Bergstrom, A. How Swedish teenagers think and feelconcerning the nuclear threat. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of thethreat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston, MA: IPPNW,1985. Pp. 170-180.

Holsti, O.R. Perceptions of time, perceptions of alternatives, and patterns ofcommunication as factors in crisis decision-making. In: Peace ResearchSociety, Papers, Vol. III. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965. Pp. 79-120.

Holsti, O.R. Crisis management. In: Glad, B. (Ed.) Psychological dimen-sions of war. London: Sage, 1990. Pp. 116-142.

25

24

Holsti, O.R., Brody, R,A. & Worth, R.C. MeasurIg affect and action ininternational reaction models. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) PeaceResearch Society, Papers, Vol. B. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1965. Pp. 170-190.

Holt, R.R. Can psychology meet Einstein's challenge? Political Psychology,1984, 5, 199-225.

Holt, R.R. On thc relevance of psychology to preventing war. AmericanPsychologist, 1988, 43(4), 323-325.

Holt, R.R. College students definitions and images of enemies. Journal ofSocial Issues, 1989, 45(2), 33-50.

Holt, R.R. & Silverstein, B, (Eds.) The image of the enemy: U.S. views ofthe Soviet Union. (Special issue of): Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2).

van Hoorn, J., le Veck, P. & French, P. Transitions in the nuclear age: Lateadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 2(1),41 -53.

Horn, K. & Rinberger, V. (Eds.) Mit Kriegsgefahren leben: Bedrohtsein,Bedrohungsgefiihle und friedenspolitisches Engagement. Opladen: West-deutscher Verlag, 1987.

Howell, S. & Willis, R. (Eds,) Societies at peace: Anthropological perspec-tives. New York: Routledge, 1989.

Hunter, A.E. (Ed.) On peace, war, and gender: A challenge to geneticexplanations. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University ofNew York, 1991.

van Iizendoorn, M.H. Moral judgment and concern about nuclear war.Youth and Society, 1987, 18(3), 282-301.

van ljzendoorn, M.H. The relation of moral judgment to authoritarianism,sexism, ethno-centrism and concern about nuclear war. Journal of MoralEducation, 1990, /9(1), 38-47.

*Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. The medical implica-tions of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1986.

Intriligator, M.D. & Brito, D.L. The potential contribution of psychologyto nuclear war issues. American Psychologist, 1988, 43, 318-321.

Jacobs, M.S. American psychology in the quest for nuclear peace. NewYork: Praeger, 1989.

25

Th

Jacobsen, B. Krigen, freden og danskerne: En undersogelse af voksnedanskeres opfattelse af internationale forhold. /War, peace and the Danes:A study of the conceptions of international relations among adult Danes./Copenhagen: Ejlers, 1988.

Jahoda, G. & Harrison, S. Belfast children: Some effects of a conflict en-vironment. Irish Journal of Psychology, 1975,3(1), 1-19.

Janis, I.L. Victims of groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.

Janis, I.L. Problems of international crisis management in the nuclear age.Journal of Social Issues, 1986, 42(2), 201-220.

Jensen, J.P. "Jeg er ikke racist, men ..." Om fordomme og fjendebilleder./"I am not a racist, but ..." About prejudice and enemy images./Psykologi, 1989, (21), 5-16.

Jensen, J.P., Jacobsen, B. & Keldorff, S. Contribution to a psychology forpeace for a consciousness and action against war. Tidskrift forNordisk F6-ening for Pedagogisk Forskning, 1982, 2(4), 34-45.

Jensen, M.P. Gender, sex roles, and attitudes toward war and nuclearweapons. Sex Roles, 1987, 17, 253-267.

Jervis, R. The logic of images in international relations. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press, 1970.

Jervis, R. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton:Princeton University Press, 1976.

Jervis, R., Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Psychology and deterrence. Balti-more, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. Joining together. (2nd ed.) EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Creative conflict. Edina, MN: InteractionBook Co., 1987.

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. Cooperation and competition. Edina, MN:Interaction Book Co., 1989.

Johnson, M.J. Attitudes toward achieving peace: A measure of "peacethrough strength" and "peace through cooperation" and the relationshipsof these attitudes with affective, coping, personality, and gendercorrelates. (Ph. D.) University of Southern California, 1990. (51-08B, p.4090.)

9

IPec

26

Johnson, R.N. et al. Attitudes concerning nuclear war in Finland and in theUnited States. Aggressive Behavior, 1986, 12, 155-166.

Jones, R.A. Self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.

Jones, V. Attitude of college students and their changes: A 37-year study.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1970, 81(1), 3-80.

Juhasz, A.M. & Palmer, L.L. Adolescent perspectives of ways of thinkingand believing that promote peace. Adolescence, 1991, 26, 849-855.

Ka hit., L.S. & Landau, J.H. Peacemaking: A systems approach to conflictmanagement. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1988.

*Kahnert, M., Pitt, D. & Taipale, I. (Eds.) Children and war. Helsinki:Peace Union of Finland, 1983.

Kanani Hendijani, B. College of education students' attitudes towardselected international problems. (Ph.D.) Denton, TX: North Texas StateUniversity, 1983.

Kaniasty, K. & Norris, F.H. Some psychological consequences of thePersian Gulf War on the American people: An empirical study.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1991, 15(4), 121-126.

Kanofsky, S. The possibility of nuclear war: Appraisal, coping, andemotional response. (Ph. D.) Berkeley, CA: California School ofProfessional Psychology, 1989. 268 pp. (50/08B, p. 3759. 89-26364.)

Kaplowitz, N. National self-images, perception of enemies, and conflictstrategies: Psychopolitical dimensions of international relations. PoliticalPsychology, 1990, 11(1), 39-82.

Kara, K. & Rehák, J. War and peace as conceived in various social groups.In: Ornauer, H. et al. (Eds.). Images of the world in the year 2000. TheHague: Mouton, 1976. Pp. 317-352.

Katz, D., Kelman, H.C. & Vassiliou, V. A comparative approach to thestudy of nationalism. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace ResearchSociety, Papers, Vol. XIV, Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1970. Pp. 1-13.

Keen, S. Faces of the enemy: Reflections of the hostile imagination. NewYork: Harper, 1986.

Keilin, W.G. Reactions to the threat of nuclear war: An investigation ofemotional and defensive processes. (Ph. D.) Colorado State University,1987. 206 pp. (49/05B, p. 1931. 88-08953.)

2 :3

27

Keldorff, S. Hvoifor krig? Kommentarer till en ny kold krig. /Why war?Comments on a new cold war./ Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg Univer-sitetsforlag, 1986.

Keldorff, S. Holdninger till kaprustning og bekymring for atomkrig./Attitudes towards the arms race and nuclear war concern./ Gistrup,Denmark: Edupax, 1989.

Keldorff, S. The image of the enemy from an external, military to aninternal, civilian enemy. Educational and Psychological Interactions, No.108, 1991.

Kelman, B.C. (Ed.) International behavior. New York: Holt, 1965.

Kelman, H.C. The role of the individual in international relations: Someconceptual and methodological considerations. Journal of InternationalAffairs, 1970, 24(1), 1-17.

Kelman, H.C. The problem-solving workshop in conflict resolution. In:Merritt, R.L. (Ed.) Communication in international politics. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press, 1972.

Kelman, H.C. An interactional approach to conflict resolution. Inter-national Interactions, 1979, 6(2), 99-122.

Kelman, H.C. The political psychology of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:How can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? PoliticalPsychology, 1987, 8, 347-363.

Kelman, H.C. A behavioral science perspective on the study of war andpeace. In: lessor, R. (Ed.) Perspectives on behavioral science. Boulder,CO: Westview Press, 1991. Pp. 245-275.

Kelman, H.C. & Bloom, A. Assumptive frameworks in intenational politics.In: Knutson, J. (Ed.) Handbook of political psychology. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass, 1973.

*Kelman, H.C. & Hamilton, V.L. Crimes of obedience: Toward a socialpsychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven, CT: Yale Uni-versity Press, 1989.

Kelman, H.C. & The Project "Preparedness for Peace". Social-psycholog-ical aspects of peace Pducation: With a focus on interactive problemsolving, redefining security, and fostering personal responsibility.Reprints and Miniprints, No. 626, 1988.

9 Q

28

Kemp, G. The art of war. In: Smoker, P., Davies, R. & Munske, B. (Eds.)A reader in peace studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. Pp. 182-190.

Kierulff, S. Belief in "Armageddon Theology" and willingness to risk nu-clear war. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1991, 30(1), 81-93.

Kiesel, D.F. Spirituality, interconnectedness, environmentalism, and peace:Roles for clinical psychologists. (Ph. D.) California School ofProfessional Psychology Los Angeles, 1990. 256 pp. (51-07B, p. 3612.90-34999.)

Kirkland, P.R. Childhood, psychopathology, and the Gulf War. Journal ofPsychohistory, 1991, 19(1), 57-65.

Klineberg, 0. Tensions affecting international understanding: A survey ofresearch. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1950.

Klineberg, 0. The human dimension in international relations. New York:Holt, 1964.

Klineberg, 0. Public opinion and nuclear war. American Psychologist,1984, 39, 1245-1253.

Klineberg, 0. Children and nuclear war: A methodological note. Interna-tional Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15,253-260.

Klineberg, 0. The contributions of psychology to international understand-ing: Problems and possibilities. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychologyof war and peace: The image of the enemy. New York: Plenum Press,1991. Pp. 71-83.

Kloep, M. PrejL lice and peace: Is the Swedish youth neutral in its attitudes?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1991, 32(1), 31-37.

Knox, T.A. Reactions to the threat of nuclear war: A new measure of state,trait, and concept-specific emotions. (Ph. D.) Colorado State University,1987. 144 pp. (48/05B, p. 1547. 87-17159.)

Kohr, H.U. Psychological correlates of threat perception in West Germany,1978 and 1981. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war andpeace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 251-262.

Kramer, B.M. & Moyer, R.S. (Eds.) Nuclear psychology bibliography.Ann Arbor, MI: Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues,1990.

29

Krampen, G. et al. Semantische Merkmale vier vielverwendeter politischerBegriffe in flint- Nationalitätsstichproben. Zeitschrtft far experimentelleund angewandte Psychqlogie, 1990, 37, 459-485.

Kriesberg, L. The sociology of social conflict. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1973.

Kristiansen, K.K. & Rasmussen, J.R. (Eds.) Fjendebilleder og fremmedhad./Enemy images and hatred towards foreign groups./ Copenhagen: FN-forbundet, 1988.

Kull, S. Mind-sets of defense policy-makers. Psychohistory Review, 1986,14(3), 21-37.

Kull, S. Minds at war: Nuclear reality and the inner conflicts of defensepolicymakers. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

Kulman, I.R. The development of an objective questionnaire to assessperception, concern, and knowledge of, and attention and response to, thetit/eat of nuclear war. (Ph. D.) Kent State University, Ohio, 1985. 221pp. (46/05B, p. 1691. 85-11474.)

Kurz, R. Zur Rezeption der Aggressionstheorien in der Peidagogik:Friedenserziehung zwischen psychoanalytischer und lerntheoretischerOrientierung. (Diss.) Dortmund: Univ., 1982. 398 pp.

L'Abate, A. Research as a tool for peace education. In: Bjerstedt, A. (Ed.)Peace education: Glimpses from the EUPRA Conference in Firenze.Malmo, Sweden: School of Education, 1992. Pp. 5-14.

LaFarge, P. The Strangelove legacy: Children, parents, and teachers in thenuclear age. New York: Harper, 1987.

LaGuardia, M.R. Nuclear fear and children: The impact of parental nuclearactivism, responsivity, and fear. (Ph. D.) Kent State University, Ohio,1987. 217 pp. (47/12A, Pt 1, p. 4329. 87-05806.)

Lambert, W.E. & Klineberg, 0. Children's views of foreign peoples. NewYork: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

Lange, A. & Westin, C. Etnisk diskriminering och social identitet. /Ethnicdiscrimination and social identity./ Stockholm: Liber, 1981.

Larsen, K.S. Attitudes toward nuclear disarmament and their correlates.Journal of Social Psychology, 1985, 125(1), 17-21.

3

30

Lasker, G. Race attitudes in children. New York: Holt, 1929. (Reprint:Greenwood Press, 1968.)

Laszlo, E. & Keys, D. (Eds.) Disarmament: The human factor. Oxford:Pergarnon Press, 1981.

Lavik, N.J. Contributions from psychiatry on the peace-war issue. Bulletinof Peace Proposals, 1989, 20, 157-165.

Lebow, R.N. & Stein, J.G. Beyond deterrence. Journal of Social Issues,1987, 43(4), 5-71.

Lentz, T.F. Towards a science of peace. London: Halcyon Press, 1955.

Levine, H.B., Jacobs, D. & Rubin, L.J. (Eds.) Psychoanalysis and thenuclear threat: Clinical and theoretical studies. Hillsdale, NJ: AnalyticPress, 1988.

LeVine, R.A. & Campbell, D.T. Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict,ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley, 1972.

Levinger, G. Beyond deterrence. (Special issue of:) Journal of SocialIssues, 1987, 43(4).

Leviton, D. (Ed.) Horrendous death and health: Toward action. New York:Hemisphere, 1991.

Levy, S.G. & Hefner, R. Multidimensional scaling of international atti-tudes. In: Isard, W. & Wolpert, J. (Eds.) Peace Research Society, Papers.Vol. 1. Philadelphia, PA: PRS, 1964. Pp. 129-165.

Lewis, C., Goldberg, S. & Parker, K.R. Nuclear worries of Canadianyouth: Replication and extension. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry,1989, 59(4), 520-527.

Lidin-Jansson, G. & Cederblom, S. (Eds.) Karnvapen i pvkologisktperspektiv. Angered, Sweden: Svenska lakare mot k4rnvapen, 1982.

Lifton, R.J. Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: RandomHouse, 1967.

Lifton, R.J. Beyond nuclear numbing. Teachers College Record, 1982,84, 15-29.

Lifton, R.J. A nuclear ethos: Ten psychological-ethical principles. Journalof Humanistic Psychology, 1985, 25(4), 39-40.

31

Lifton, R.J. The future of immortality and other essays for a nuclear age.New York: Basic Books, 1987. (a)

Lifton, R.J. Images of nuclear war and human destruction: Psychologicalperspectives. The McGill Journal of Education, 1987, 22, 203-218. (b)

Lifton, R.J. & Falk, R. Indefensible weapons: The political and psycholog-ical case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books, 1982.

Lindell, E. & Sallströrn, M, VAldets varierande verkningar. /Violence andits varying effects./ Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem, Nr 425, 1983.

Lindholm, S. The image of the developing countries: An inquiry intoSwedish public opinion. Stockhelm: Alinqvist & Wiksell, 1971.

Lindholm, S. A thousand students on war, peace and peace education.(Paper, IPRA, Sussex, England, April 1986.) Stockholm: Department ofEducation, Stockholm University, 1986.

Lindstrtim, P. Den harda linjen och den mjuka: En studie av sdkerhets-politisk attitydbildning. /The hard and soft approach: Attitude formationin the area of security politics./ Uppsala: Institutionen for freds- och kon-fliktforskning, 1986.

Locate Ili. M.G. & Holt, R.R. Antinuclear activism, psychic numbing, andmental health. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 143-161.

Lowenstein, L.F. Education for world citizenship. Psychology: A QuarterlyJournal of Human Behavior, 1987, 24(3), 47-49.

Lowenstein, L.F. Realistic versus less realistic peace activism. New JerseyJournal of Professional Counseling, 1990, 53(1), 2-6.

Lowenthal, M.S. Emotionally disturbed adolescents' reactions to the nuclearthreat. (Psy. D.) Rutgers University, Graduate School of Applied &Professional Psychology, 1988. 239 pp. (49/07B, p. 2864. 88-13670.)

Lyon, M.A. & Russo, T.J. Student concern and potential action regardingnuclear threat. (Paper.) Boston, MA: American Psychological Asso-ciation, 1990. (ED 322 464.)

Mack, J.E. The perception of U.S.-Soviet intentions and other psycho-logical dimensions of the nuclear arms race. American Journal of Ortho-psychiatry, 1982, 52, 590-600.

Mack, J.E. Resistances to knowing in the nuclear age. Harvard EducationalReview, 1984, 54, 260-270.

33

Mack, J.E. Nuclear weapons and the dark side of humankind. PoliticalPsychology, 1986, 7, 223-233.

Mack, J.E. The challenge of political self-responsibility in the nuclear age.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(3), 75-87.

Mack, J.E. Inventing a psychology of our relationship to the earth. In:Staub, S. & Green, P. (Eds.) Psychology and social responsibility: Facingglobal challenges. New York: New York University Press, 1992. Pp.237-247.

Mack, J.E. & Redmont, J.C. On being a psychoanalyst in the nuclear age.Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29(3), 338-355.

Mack, J.E. & Snow, R. Psychological effects on children and adolescents.In: White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuciear war.New York: NYU Press, 1986. Pp. 16-33.

Macy, J.R. Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia,PA: New Society Publishers, 1983.

Macy, J.R. Planetary perils and psychological responses: Despair and em-powerment work. In: Staub, S. & Green, P (Eds.) Psychology and socialresponsibility: Facing global challenges. New York: New York Uni-versity Press, 1992. Pp. 30-58.

Mann, J.A. & Gaertner, S.L. Support for the use of force in war: Theeffect of procedural rule violations and group membership. .lournal ofApplied Social Psychology, 1991, 21, 1793-1809.

Mantel!, D. & Pilisuk, M. (Eds.) Soldiers in and after Vietnam. Journal ofSocial Issues, 1975, 31(4).

Mapes, M.C. The National Peace Academy: Conflict management and con-flict resolution. American Journal of Social Psychiatry, 1987, 7(3), 135-140.

Marcattilio, A.J. & Nevin, J.A. The threat of nuclear war: Some responses.Behavior Analyst, 1986, 9(1), 61-70.

Markey, E.J. The politics of a:ros control: A matter of perception. Ameri-can Psychologist, 1985, 40, 557-560.

Martini, M. & Krampen, G. Caratteristiche semantiche di concetti politici:Una ricerca comparata. /Semantic properties of political concepts: Acomparative study./ Ricerche di Psicologia, 1990, /4(3), 101-127.

Marullo, S. Gender differences in peace movement participation. (Paper.)Baltimore, MD: Eastern Sociological Society, 1989.

Mathisen, P. Barns og unges framtidsforestellinger Et pedagogisk an-liggende. /Conceptions of the future among children and young peopleA task for education./ Oslo: Pedagogisk Forskningsinstitutt, 1990.

De Mause, L. A proposal for a nuclear tensions monitoring center. Specialissue: The psychogenic theory of history: A critique. Journal of Psycho-history, 1985, 13(2), 197-206.

Mayton, D.M. Spontaneous concern about nuclear war by college students.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1986, 7(3), 185-193. (a)

Mayton, D.M. The structure of attitudes to doomsday issues: A replica-tion. Australian Psychologist, 1986, 21(3), 395-403. (b)

Mayton, D.M. Values and nuclear freeze attitudes: Some value-attitude re-lationships in adolescents. Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987, /2,111-114.

Mayton, D.M. Measurement of nuclear war attitudes: Methods and con-cerns. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 241-263.

Mayton, D.M. & Delamater, M.C. Indirect assessment of concern aboutnuclear war. Psychological Reports, 1986, 59, 709-710.

McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers and college women coping with nuclearthreat: A comparative study of thoughts and actions about nuclear war.Psychological Reports, 1988, 62(2), 619-625. (a)

McCarthy, S.V. Elderhostelers' coping with nuclear threat: Peacemakingand perception of lifeworld. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1988, 66(1),264-266. (b)

McClenney, L. Fear of nuclear war: "When I grow up, I want to be an oldwoman." In: Suedfield, P. & Tetlock, P.E. (Eds.) Psychology and socialpolicy. New York: Hemisphere, 1992. Pp. 95-103.

McClenney, L. & Neiss, R. Psychological responses to the threat of nuclearwar. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1989, / 9(15, Pt 1), 1239-1267.

McGinnis, J. & McGinnis, K. Parenting for peace. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis,1981.

3 5

34

McGraw, K.M. & Tyler, T.R. The threat of nuclear war and psychologicalwell-being. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986,15, 172-188.

McKenzie-Mohr, D.P. Perceptions of threat, collective control, tacticalefficacy and competing threats as determinants of pro-disarmamentbehavior. Waterloo, ON: University of Waterloo, Canada, 1988.(49/12B, p. 5571.)

McKenzie-Mohr, D. & Dyal, J.A. Perceptions of threat, tactical efficacyand competing threats as determinants of pro-disarmament behavior.Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 1991, 6, 675-696.

Mellville, A. How we view each other: The enemy image and new politicalthinking. Moscow: Novosti Press, 1988.

Melnikova, 0. & Shirkov, Y. Image of the enemy: A description of theimage of the enemy among the Soviet people by an associative technique.Educational and Psychological Interactions, No. 102, 1990.

Mende, K.D. & Rathenow, H.-F. (Eds.) Vorurteile und Feindbilder i,n Ost-West-Verhiihnis. Berlin: Technische Universitat, 1990.

Mercer, G. Adolescent views of war and peace Another look. Journal ofPeace Research, 1974, II, 247-249.

Milburn, T.W. Peace-keeping, peace-making, and peace-building: Newroles for military and peace psychologists. The Peace PsychologyBulletin, 1993, 2(1), 19-22.

Milgram, S. Obedience to authority. New York: Harper, 1974.

Miller, M.S. Peace through parenting: Some antecedents of militarism inmen. (Ph.D.) The Union for Experimenting Colleges and Universities,1987. (Order No. ZA 8725103.)

Mische, P.M. Perceptions of social justice as a variable affecting conflict orcooperation, war or peace in a social system: The 1986 people's revolt inthe Philippines as a case study. (Ed. D.) Columbia University TeachersCollege, 1991. 668 pp. (52/07A, p. 2708. 91-36413.)

Mitrofan, I. & Mitrofan, N. Peace and the human condition in the view ofRomanian students. Revue Roumaine des Sciences Sociales (Serie de Psy-chologie), 1988, 32(1), 87-93.

Modell, J. & Haggerty, T. The social impact of war. Annual Review ofSociology, 1991, 17, 205-224.

35

Morawski, J.G. & Goldstein, S.E. Psychology and nuclear war: A chapterin our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 1985, 40,276-284.

Morris, S.M. et al. The effects of participation in a Canadian peace educa-tion project on student anxiety and sense of personal control. Peace &Change, 1990, 15, 292-311.

Moyer, R.S. Teaching psychology courses about the nuclear arms race.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1987, 12(3), 101-110.

Mueller, J. Changing attitudes towards war: The impact of the First WorldWar. British Journal of Political Science,1991, 21(1), 1-28.

Murphy, B.C. & Polyson, J.A. Peace, war, and nuclear issues in the psy-chology classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 1991, 18(3), 153-157.

Murphy, G. (Ed.) Human nature and enduring peace. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin, 1945.

Nelson, A. Psychological equivalence: Awareness and response-ability inour nuclear age. American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 549-556.

Nelson, L. Psychological factors in war and peacemaking. ContemporarySocial Psychology, 1991, 15(4), 172-178.

Nelson, L. & Beardsley, G.L. Toward an interdisciplinary model ofbarriers to nuclear arms control. Social Science Journal, 1987, 24(4),375-388.

Nerman, T. Folkhatet. /The hatred against other nations./ Stockholm:Svenska Andelsfbrlaget, 1918.

Nevin, J.A. Behavior analysis, the nuclear arms race, and the peace move-ment. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 27-44.

Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear attitudes and reactions: Associations with de-pression, drug use, quality of life. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology, 1986, 50, 906-920.

Newcomb, M.D. Background, personality, and behavioral correlates ofnuclear anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 1988, 9, 379-389. (a)

Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear anxiety and psychosocial functioning amongyoung adults. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1988, 9, 107-134.(b)

37

Newcomb, M.D. Assessment of nuclear anxiety among American students:Stability over time, secular trends, and emotional correlates. Journal ofSocial Psychology, 1989, 129, 591-608.

Newman, D. Overcoming the psychological barrier: The role of images inwar and peace. In: Kliot, N. & Waterman, S. (Eds.) The political geog-raphy of conflict and peace. London: Belhaven Press, 1991. Pp. 201-216.

Nielsen, G.S. (Ed.) Psychology and international affairs. Can we contrib-ute? Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1962.

Nilsson, N. Krig dr ingen lek. /War is no play./ Stockholm: Tiden, 1981.

Nilsson, N. Do children need to be introduced to violence? The use of toysof war and violence. (Paper.) Hong Kong: International Conference onEarly Education and Development, 1989.

Notting, H.P. Lernschritte zur Gewaltlosigkeit: Ergehnisse psychologischerFriedensforschung. Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1981.

Nord land, E. Mir barn leker krig. /When children play war./ Barn, 1984,(3), 24-31, 64.

Northrup, T.A. Women's and men's conceptions of war, peace andsecurity. (Ph. D.) Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, 1987. 152 pp.(49/02B, p. 569. 88-06697.)

Oboodiat, F. Young children's understanding of peace concepts: Negativepeace, nonviolent-conflict-resolution, and positive peace. (Ph. D.) TheUniversity of Texas at Austin, 1992. 240 pp. (53104A, p. 1041. 92-25691.)

Oliner, S.P. Altruism: Antidote to buman conflict. Humboldt .lournal ofSocial Relations, 1991, 16(2), 1-37.

Oliver, P. Reactions of young New Zealanders to nuclear issues. Com-munity Mental Health in New Zealand, 1989, 4(2), 23-40.

Oliver, P. Nuclear freedom and students' sense of efficacy about preventionof nuclear war. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1990, 60(4), 611-621.

O'Malley, E.M. Global awareness of administrators in higher education inthe State of Oregon. (Ed.D.) Portland, OR: Portland State University,1983.

3 L

37

Ornauer, H., Wiberg, H., Sicitiski, A. & Galtung, J. (Eds.) Images of theworld in the year 2000: A comparative ten nation study. The Hague:Mouton, 1976.

van Ornum, W. & Wicker van Ornum, M. Talking with children about nu-clear war. New York: Continuum Press, 1984.

*Osgood, C.E. An alternative to war and surrender. Urbana, IL: Uni-versity of Illinois Press, 1962.

Osgood, C.E. Toward international behavior appropriate to a nuclear age.In: Nielsen, G. (Ed.) Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress ofApplied Psychology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1962. Pp. 109-132.

Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policy issues.Applied Social Psychology Annual. Vol. 6. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage,1985.

Oskamp, S. et al. The media and nuclear war: Fallout from TV's The DayAfter. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 127-158.

Oskamp, S., Bordin, J. & Edwards, T. Background experiences andattitudes of peace activists. Journal of Psychology, 1992, 126(1), 49-61.

Ostermann, A. Vorurteile haben doch nur die anderen. In: CallieB, J. &Lob, R.E. (nds.) Handbuch Praxis der Umwelt- una Friedenserziehung.Band 3. Ditsseldorf: Schwann, 1988. Pp. 457-466.

Osterrnann, A. & Nicklas, H. Vorurteile und Feindbilder. (3. Aufl.) Wein-heim: Beltz, 1984.

Palmer, E.L. The flower and the mushroom: Young children encounter"The Day After". Marriage and Family Review, 1986, 10(2), 51-58.

Papadatou, D. & Papadatos, C. (Eds.) Children and death. New York:Hemisphere, 1991.

Paradise, J.M. Making peace: A psychosocial study of a group of non-violent nuclear resisters (social activist, civil disobedience, religious).(Ed. D.) Boston University, 1987. 203 pp. (48/04A, p. 881. 87-16092.)

Parknäs, L. Viigen till fOrändring: En handbok for Overlevnadsarbete.(the road to change: A handbook for survival work./ Goteborg: Paxforlag, 1990.

Pasierbsky, F. Krieg und Frieden in der Sprache: Eine sprachwissen-schaftliche Textanalyse. Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1983.

39

0

38

Pavelchak, M.A. & Schoefield, J.W. Fallout from "The Day After":Content-relevant effects. (Paper.) Toronto: American PsychologicalAssociation, 1984.

Pear, T.H. (Ed.) Psychological factors of peace and war. New York:Philosophical Library, 1950.

Peck, C. Identifying and treating maladaptive responses to the nuclearthreat. Behavior Analysis & Social Action, 1989, 7(1-2), 16-22.

Peck, C. Conflict management and the prevention of war. Australian Psy-chologist, 1990, 25(1), 2-14.

Pelton, L.H. The psychology of nonviolence. New York: Pergamon Press,1974.

Perlman, M. Memory, soul and the place of Hiroshima. PsychohistoryReview, 1987, /6(1), 67-97.

Pedman, M. Imaginal memory and the place of Hiroshima. Albany, NY:State University of New York Press, 1988.

Petersen, C.C., Lawrence, LA. & Dawes, I. The relationship of gender, sexrole, and law-and-o:der attitudes to nuclear opinions. Sex Roles, 1990,22(5-6), 283-292.

Pettigrew, T.F. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cog-nitive analysis of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin,1979, 5, 461-476.

Pfliiger P.M. (Ed.) Freund- und Feindbilder: Begegnung mit dem Osten.Olten, Switzerland: Walter-Verlag, 1986.

Phillips, N.E. Militarism and grass-roots involvement in the military-industrial complex. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1073, 17, 625-655.

Piaget, J. & Weil, M.A. Development in children of the idea of homelandand of relations with other countries. International Social ScienceBulletin, 1951, 3(3), 561-578.

Pike, L. et al. Other nations, other people: A survey of student interests,knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Washington, DC: US Govern-ment Printing Office, 1979.

Pilisuk, M. Experimenting with the arms race. Journal of Conflict Resolu-tion, 1984, 28, 296-315.

40

39

Pilisuk, M. An agenda for peace psychology. The Peace PsychologyBulletin, 1993, 2(1), 22-26.

Plante, T.G. & Manuel, G.M. The Persian Gulf War: Civilian war-relatedstress and the influence of age, religious faith, and war attitudes. Journalof Clinical Psychology, 1992, 48, 178-182.

Plous, S. Disarmament, arms control, and peace in the nuclear age: Politi-cal objectives and relevant research. Journal of Social Issues, 1988,44(2), 133-154.

Plous, S. & Zimbardo, P.G. The looking glass war. Psychology Today,1984, 18(11), 48-59.

Polyson, J.A., Stein, D.M. & Sholley, B.K. A survey of psychologists'nuclear war attitudes. Political Psychology, 1988, 9, 25-39.

Pool, I.D. Symbols of internationalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford UniversityPress, 1951.

Poole, M.E. & Cooney, G.H. Orientations to the future: A comparison ofadolescents in Australia and Singapore. Journal of Youth and Adoles-cence, 1987, 16(2), 129-151.

Porter, K., Rinzler, D. & Olsen, P. (Eds.) Heal or die: Psychotherapistsconfront nuclear annihilation. New York: Psychohistory Press, 1987.

Post, J. Into adolescence: Stopping violence. A curriculum for grades 5-8.Santa Cruz, CA: ETR Associates/Network Publications, 1991.

Prior, M. Australian adolescents' views of the nuclear threat. Interdis-ciplinary Peace Research, 1989, / (1), 61-85.

Proceedings of the Congress of European Psychologists for Peace, Helsinki,August 8-10, 1986. Helsinki: The Finnish Psychological Society, 1987.

Pruitt, D.G. & Rubin, J.Z. Social conflict: Escalation, statement and settle-ment. New York: Random House, 1986.

Psychological aspects of nuclear development. Washington, DC: AmericanPsychiatric Association, 1982,

Punamäki, R.-L. Childhood under conflict: The attitudes and emotionallife of Israeli and Palestinian children. Tampere: Tampere Peace Re-search Institute, 1987.

41

40

Rabow, 3., Hemandez, A.C.R. & Newcomb, M.D. Nuclear fears and con-cerns among college students: A cross-national study of attitudes. Poli-tical Psychology, 1990, I 1(4), 681-698.

Radin, F. Attitude formation of youth and its effect on the perception ofthreat and security. In: Unesco yearbook on peace and conflict studies,1983. Paris: Unesco, 1985. Pp. 27-41.

Ramirez, J.M., Hinde, R.A. & Groebel, J. (Eds.) Essays on violence.Sevilla, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla, 1987.

Raundalen, M. & Finnoy, O.J. Children's and teen-agers' views of thefuture. International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 114-125. (a)

Raundalen, M. & Finnoy, O.J. Scandinavian youth view the future. In: Themedical implications of nuclear war. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress, 1986. Pp. 435-443. (b)

Raundalen, M. & Raundalen, T.S. Barn i atomalderen. /Children in thenuclear age./ Oslo: J.W. Cappelen, 1984.

Readiness for peace Readiness for the future: Reports and Miniprintsfrom the Malmo School of Education. Reprints and Miniprints (Malmö,Sweden: School of Education), No. 743, 1992.

Reardon, B.A. Sexism and the war system. New York: Teachers CollegePress, 1985.

Reifel, S. Children living with the nuclear threat. Young Children, 1984,39, 74-80.

Richter, H.E. Alle redeten vom Frieden. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1981.

Richter, H.E. Zur Psychologie des Friedens. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 1982.

Richter, H.E. Die jungen Pazifisten: Psychosoziale Bedingungen engagierterKinder und Jugendlicher. Plidagogik (Weinheim), 1991, 43(9), 17-21.

Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace: The image of theenemy. New York: Plenum, 1991.

Ris, H.W. The psychological effect of the threat of nuclear war on childrenand adolescents: A report of The Third International Congress of Inter-national Physicians to Prevent Nuclear War. International Journal ofAdolescent Medicine & Health, 1985, /, 391-395.

41

de Rivera, J.H. The psychological dimension of foreign policy. Columbus,OH: Merrill, 1968.

de Rivera, .1. Facing nuclear weapons. American Behavioral Scientist, 1984,

27, 739-756.

de Rivera, J. & Laird, J. Peace fair or warfare: Educating the community.Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 59-80.

Robarchek, C.A. & Robarchek, C.J. Cultures of war and peace: Acomparative study of Waorani and Semai. In: Silverberg, J. & Gray, J.P.(Eds.) Aggression and peacefulness in humans and other primates. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1992. Pp. 189-213.

Robinson, J.P., Chivian, E. & Tudge, J. News media use and adolescents'attitudes about nuclear issues: An American-Soviet comparison. Journalof Communication, 1989, 39(2), 105-113.

Rockowitz, M. Personality and demographic correlates of attitudes towardnuclear war and nuclear weapons. (Ph. D.) University of Windsor,Canada, 1985. (46/09B, p. 3256.)

Rogers, C.R. A psychologist looks at nuclear war: Its threat, its possibleprevention. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1982, 22, 9-20.

Rogers, C.R. Steps toward world peace, 1948-1986: Tension reduction intheory and practice. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 12-16.

Rogers, C.R. & Malcolm, D. The potential contribution of the behavioralscientist to world peace. Counseling and Values, 1987, 32(1), 10-11.

Rogers, C. & Ryback. D. One alternative to nuclear planetary suicide.Counseling Psychologist, 1984, 12(2), 3-12.

Roscoe, B. Social issues as social problems: Adolescents' perceptions.Adolescence, 1985, 20, 377-383.

Roscoe, B. & Goodwin, M.P. Adolescents' knowledge of nuclear issues andthe effects of nuclear war. Adolescence, 1987, 22, 803-812.

Rosell, L. Barns forestiillningar om krig och fred. /Conceptions of war andpeace among children./ Lund: Sociologiska institutionen, 1968. (a)

Rosell, L. Children's views of war and peace. Journal of Peace Research,1968, 5, 268-276. (b)

4 3

42

Rosenblatt, R. Kinder des Krieges: Gespreiche mit Kindern aus Nordirland,Israel, Libanon, Kambodscha und Vietnam. Hamburg: Kabel Verlag,1984.

Rosenthal, K.A. Attitudes toward structural violence, war and peace: Asystems perspective. (Ph. D.) California School of Professional Psy-chology Los Angeles, 1990. 186 pp. (51-07B, p. 3616. 90-34998.)

Rounds, LB. & Erdahl, P. Nuclear locus of control scales. Educational andPsychological Measurement, 1988, 48, 387-395.

Rowe, D. Living with the bomb: Can we live without enemies? London:Routledge, 1985.

Roy, P.J. An examination of psychological variables related to nuclearattitudes and nuclear activism. (Ph.D.) Berkeley, CA: California Schoolof Professional Psychology, 1985. 144 pp. (46/05B, p. 1700. 85-12615.)

Rubenfeld, F. The peace manual: A guide to personal-political integration.Berkeley, CA: Lion-Lamb Press, 1986.

Rubin, J.Z. Experimental research on third-party interaction in conflict:Toward some generalizations. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 87, 379-391.

Rudmin, F.W. Seventeen early peace psychologists. Journal of HumanisticPsychology, 1991, 31(2), 12-43.

Rudoy, D.W. A legacy of insecurity, a reservoir of hope: The psychol-ogical impact and developmental implications of the threat of nuclearwar on adolescents (peace studies, locus-of-control, adolescentalienation). (Ph. D.) Fordhan University, 1985. 230 pp. (46/08B, p.2790. 85-21415.)

Russo, T.J. & Lyon, M.A. Predictors of college students' levels of knowl-edge and concern about nuclear war. Journal of Applied Social Psy-chology, 1990, 20, 739-750.

Sackett, R.S. Psychological responses to the nuclear threat: Individualdifferences and trait characteristics. (Ph. D.) Colorado State University,1986. 131 pp. (47/08B, p. 3542. 86-18200.)

Sande, G.N. et al. Value-guided attributions: Maintaining the moral self-image and the diabolical enemy-image. Journal of Social Issues, 1989,45(2), 91-118.

Sandman, P.M. & Valenti, J.M. Scared stiff or scared into action. Bulletinof the Atomic Scientists, 1986, 42(1), 12-16.

4 (';

43

Schatz, R.T. & Fiske, S.T. International reactions to the threat of nuclearwar: The rise and fall of concern in the eighties. Political Psychology,1992, 13(1), 1-29.

Scheer, R. With enough shovels: Reagan, Bush, and nuclear war. NewYork: Random House, 1982.

Schmidhauser, U. Vorurteile, Stereotype, Feindbilder. In: Ca llieI3, J. &Lob, R.E. (Eds.) Praxis der Umwelt- und Friedenserziehung. Band I .Düsseldorf: Schwann, 1987. Pp. 358-363.

Schmigalla, H. (Ed.) Psychologie und Frieden. Jena: WissenschaftlicheBeitrage der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, 1989.

Schnaitmann, G.W. Der Friedensbegriff aus der Siclu von Schalern: Einehermeneutisch-empirische Studie fiber naive Friedensauffassungen vonSchfilern, (Diss.) Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1991.

Schuman, H. & Rieger, C. Historical analogies, generational effects, andattitudes toward war. American Sociological Review, 1992, 57, 315-326.

Schurian, W. Ein systematischer Vergleich zweier internationalerSommer-kinderdötfer (CISV) mit den Methoden der padagogisch-psycholo-gischen Feldforschung. (Diss.) Wien, 1965. 193 pp.

Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Behavioral science and human survival. Palo Alto, CA:

Science and Behavior Books, 1965.

Schwebel, M. Effects of the nuclear war threat on children and teenagers.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1982, 52, 608-618.

Schwebel, M. (Ed.) Mental health implications of life in the nuclear age.Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1986. /Special issue of: International Journalof Mental Health, I .5(1-3)./

Schwebel, M. The construction of reality in the nuclear age. Political Psy-chology, 1990, / /(3), 521-552.

Segal, H. Silence is the real crime. International Review of Psycho-Analy-sis, 1987, 14(1), 3-12.

Seligman, M.E.P. Helplessness: On depression, development, and death. SanFrancisco: Freeman, 1975.

Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Von Feindbildern zur kooperativen Bearbeitungvon gemeinsamen Zivilisationsaufgaben in Europa. Bern: Arbeitspapiereder Schweizerischen Friedensstiftung, 1990.

45

44

Senghaas-Knobloch, E. Social learning and conflict resolution in a changingEurope. In: Boulding, E. (Ed.) New agendas for peace research. London:Rienner, 1992. Pp. 13-21.

Sheffet, A.M. et al. Adolescents and nuclear arms issues. Social Science andMedicine, 1988, 27, 995-998.

Sheridan, D.B. Ecofeminist strategies of peacemaking. (Ph.D.) Eugene,OR: University of Oregon, 1990. (Order No. 90-25497.)

Sherif, M. Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict. In:Gilbert, G.M. (Ed.) Psychological approaches to intergroup andinternational understanding. Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1956.Pp. 6-12.

Sherif, M. et al. Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Caveexperiment. Norman, OK: Institute of Group Relations, 1961.

Sherif, M. & Sherif, C. In common predicament: Social psychology ofinter -roup conflict and cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin,1966.

Shohat, L. Israeli children's conceptualization of war and peace: An ex-ploratory cognitive-developmental study. New York: Columbia Uni-versity, 1985. 139 pp. (48/08B, p. 2478. 87-24095.)

Showers, D.E. The effect of persuasion on nuclear attitudes of secondaryschool students. (Paper.) Washington, DC: National Association forResearch in Science Teaching, 1987.

Silverman, J.M. & Kumka, D.S. Gender differences in attitudes towardnuclear war and disarmament. Sex Roles, 1987, 16, 189-203.

Silverstein, B. Toward a science of propaganda. Political Psychology, 1987,8, 49-60.

Silverstein, B. Enemy images: The psychology of U.S. attitudes and cog-nitions regarding the Soviet Union. American Psychologist, 1989, 44,903-913.

Silverstein, B. & Flamenbaum, C. Biases in the perception and cognition ofthe action of enemies. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 51-72.

Silverstein, B. & Holt, R.R. Research on enemy images: Present status andfuture prospects. Journal of Social Issues, 1989, 45(2), 159-175.

Simmons, J.R. Sources of political socialization to international conflict:Influences of the mass media, family, peer group, school and religion onadolescents' orientations toward war and peace. (Ph.D.) Seattle, WA:University of Washington, 1974. 415 pp. (36/06A, p. 3373. 75-28444.)

Skinner, B.F. Toward the cause of peace: What can psychology contribute?In: Oskamp, S. (Ed.) International conflict and national public policyissues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985. Pp. 21-26.

Slee, P.T. & Cross, D.G. Living in the nuclear age: An Australian study ofchildren's and adolescents fears. Child Psychiatry and Human Develop-

ment, 1989, 19(4), 270-278.

Smith, C.G. (Ed.) Conflict resolution: Contributions of the behavioralsciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1971.

Smith, M.B. War, peace and psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 1986,42(4), 23-38.

Smith, M.B. Political psychology and world order. Contemporary SocialPsychology, 1991, 15(4), 150-152.

Snyder, R.C., Bruck, H.W. & Sapin, B. Decision-making as an approach tothe study of international politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1954.

Solantaus, T. The global world: A domain for development in adolescence?Journal of Adolescence, 1989, /2(1), 27-40.

Solantaus, T. Young people and the threat of nuclear war: 'Out there is aworld I belong to'. A literature review. (Medicine and War, Vol. 7,Suppl. 1.) London: Cass, 1991.

Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.) Impact of the threat of nuclear war on childrenand adolescents. Boston, MA: International Physicians for the Preventionof Nuclear War, 1985.

Solantaus, T. & Rimpela, M. Mental health and the threat of nuclear war.International Journal of Mental Health, 1986, 15, 261-275.

Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Rahkonen, 0. Social epidemiology of theexperience of threat of war among Finnish youth. Social Science andMedicine, 1985, 21, 145-151.

Solantaus, T., Rimpela, M. & Taipale, V. The threat of war in the minds of12- to 18-year-olds in Finland. Lancet, April 7, 1984 (No. 8380),784-785.

4"

Solomon, L.N. Carl Rogers' efforts for world peace. Person-CenteredReview, 1990, 5(1), 39-56.

Solomon, Z. Does the war end when the shooting stops? The psychologicaltoll of war. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990, 20(21), 1733-1745.

Sommer, G. et al. (Eds.) Feindbilder im Dienste der Aufriistung: Beitrligeaus Psychologie und anderen Humanwissenschaften. (2. Aufl.) Marburg:Interdisziplinare Arbeitsgruppe Friedens- und Abrustungsforschung,1988.

Sommerfeld, V. Krieg und Frieden im Kinderzimmer: Ober Aggressionenund Actionspielzeug. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1991.

Sommers, F.G. et al. The nuclear threat and Canadian children. CanadianJournal of Public Health, 1984, 76, 154-156.

Sommers, F.G. & Dineen, T. Curing nuclear madness: A new-age pre-scription for personal action. Toronto: Methuen, 1984.

Spielman, M. If peace comes ... The future expectations of Jewish and ArabIsraeli children and youth. (Ph. D.) Stockholm: Almqvist & WiksellInternational, 1984.

Stagner, R. Psychological aspects of international conflict. Monterey, CA:Wadsworth, 1967.

Stanford, B. (Ed.) Peacemaking: A guide to conflict resolution for indi-viduals, groups, and nations. New York: Bantam Books, 1976.

Stangor, C., Sullivan, L.A. & Ford, T.E. Affective and cognitive deter-minants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 1991, 9, 359-380.

Staub, E. The evolution of caring and nonaggressive persons and societies.Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 81-100.

Staub, E. The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other groupviolence. Cambridge, Engl.: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Staub, E. The psychological and cultural roots of group violence: The GulfWar. Journal of Psychohistory, 1991, 19(1), 115-121.

Steiner, P.P. In collusion with the nation: A case study of group dynamicsat a strategic nuclear policy-making meeting. Political Psychology, 1989,10(4), 647-673.

47

Steinweg, R. Perception of body attitudes as a factor of violence-breedingcommunication: A proposal on grassroots peace education. Bulletin ofPeace Proposals, 1984, 15(1), 93-100.

Steinweg, R. & Wellmann, C. (Eds.) Die vergessene Dimension interna-tionaler Konflikte: Subjektivität. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1990.

Stevenson, B.W., Roscoe, B. & Kennedy, D. Perceptions of conventionalwar: Late adolescents' views. Adolescence, 1988, 23(91), 613-627.

Stewart, G.A. The relationship between adolescents' concern over the threatof nuclear war and several personality dimensions. Canadian Journal ofBehavioural Science, 1988, 20, 452-460.

Stillion, J.M. Examining the shadow: Gifted children respond to the nuclearthreat. Death Studies, 1986, 10, 27-41.

Stillion, J.M. et al. Dimensions of the shadow: Children of six nationsrespond to the nuclear threat. Death Studies, 1988, 12, 227-251.

Stoddard, F. & Mack, J.E. Children, adolescents and the threat of nuclearwar. In: Noshpitz, J.D. (Ed.) Basic handbook of child psychiatry. Vol. 5.New York: Basic Books, 1987. Pp. 616-627.

Sttitz, G. Asikt 90: En undersokning bland ungdorn i december 1990./Opinion 1990: An investigation among young people, December 1990./(Meddelande 130.) Stockholm: Styrelsen fOr psykologiskt forsvar, 1991.

Summers, C. State-sponsored destruction in 1945 and 1990: Effects of con-flicting personal responsibilities. Current Research on Peace and Vio-lence, 1990, 13, 91-96.

Sutton-Smith, B. War toys and childhood aggression. Play & Culture, 1988,1(1), 57-69.

Swingle, P.G. The resolution of conflict. Canadian Psychology, 1989,10(3), 650-661.

Szalay, L.B. & Mir-Djalali, E. Image of the enemy: Critical parameters,cultural variations. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war andpeace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 213-250.

Taha, M.M.M. The construction and the implementation of an instrument tomeasure the attitudes of college students towards conflict resolutionamong nations. (Ph.D.) University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Uni-versity, 1982.

4 9

48

Tajfel, H. Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 1969,25(4), 79-97.

Targ, H. Children's developing orientations to international politics.Journal of Peace Research, 1970, 7(3), 79-98.

Taylor, A.J. & Patten, M.D. The attitudes and responses of Wellingtonadolescents to nuclear war and other nuclear issues. New Zealand Journalof Psychology, 1988, 17, 36-40.

Templin, R.D. Psychology of war and peace. Journal of Human Relations,1968, 16(2), 239-249.

Tephly, J. Young children's understanding of war and peace. Early ChildDevelopment and Care, 1985, 20(4), 271-285.

Tetlock, P.E. et al. (Eds.) Behaviorrociety, and nuclear war. Vol. 1. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Tetlock, P.E. et al. (Eds.) Behavior, society, and nuclear war. Vol. 2. NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Tetlock, P.E., McGuire, C.B. & Mitchell, G. Psychological perspectives onnuclear deterrence. Annual Review of Psychology, 1991, 42, 239-276.

Thearle, L. & Weinreich-Haste, H. Ways of dealing with the nuclear threat:Coping and defence among British adoles. ents. International Journal ofMental Health, 1986, 15, 126-142.

Thompson, J. Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester, U.K.:British Psychological Society & Wiley, 1985.

Thompson, J. Social traps and intelligent escapes. In: Swedish ProfessionalsAgainst Nuclear Arms. Disarmament but how? Lulea, Sweden: SwedishPhysicians Against Nuclear Arms, 1988. Pp. 71-80.

Thompson, J.A. Perceptions of the Soviet Union and the arms race: A tennation cross-cultural study. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology ofwar and peace. New York: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 155-167.

Tizard, B. Problematic aspects of nuclear education. Harvard EducationalReview, 1984, 54, 271-281.

Tizard, B. Old and new paradigms: Research on young people's response tothe nuclear threat. Journal of Adolescence, 1989, 12(1), 1-10.

5)

Tolley, H. Children and war: Political socialization to international con-flict. New York: Teachers College Press, 1973.

Trygestad, J. & Bents, R. Cross-cultural perspectives on peace. (Paper.)New Orleans, LA: American Educational Research Association, 1988.

Tudge, J. et al. American and Soviet adolescents' attitudes toward thefuture: The relationship between worry about nuclear war and optimism.International Journal of Mental Health, 1990-91, 19(4), 58-84.

Tvingstedt, A.-L. Samtal med elever i Arskurs 2 om krig och fred. /Con-versations about war and peace with Swedish children in grade 2./ Peda-

gogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No. 514,1989.

United Nations. Social psychological techniques and the peaceful settlementof international disputes. New York: UNITAR, 1970.

Utas Carlsson, K. Psykologiska aspekt-r pa karnvapenhotet: Au leva underhot och att frigora kraft till forandring. /Psychological aspects of thenuclear war threat: To live under threat and to release power forchange./ Stirtryck och smdtryck, No. 628, 1988.

Utas Carlsson, K. Samtal om fred och krig med elever i Arskurs 5./Conversations about peace and war with Swedish children in grade 5./Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem (Malmo: School of Education), No.534, 1990.

Vogt, W.R. Militarlogik gegen Zivillogik: Sind Kriege abschaffbar? In:

Jahrbuch Frieden 1992. Miinchen: Beck, 1991. Pp. 39-52.

Volkan, V.D. Psychological concepts useful in the building of politicalfoundations between nations: Track II diplomacy. Journal of the Amer-ican Psychoanalytic Association, 1987, 35(4), 903-935.

Wagner, R.V., de Rivera, J. & Watkins, M. (Eds.) Psychology and the pro-motion of peace. (Special issue of:) Journal of Social Issues, 1988,

44(2).

Wahlström, R. Psykologiska utgAngspunkter for fredsfostran. /Psychologi-cal starting-points for peace education./ Nordisk Psykologi, 1984, 36 ,

160-168.

WahlstrOm, R. De ungas uppfattningar om krig och fred. /Conceptions ofwar and peace among young people./ Nordisk Psykologi, 1985, 37, 298-

309. (a)

5 1

Wahlstr6m, R. Fear of war, conceptions of war, and peace activities: Theirrelation to self-esteem in young people. In: Solantaus, T. et al. (Eds.)Impact of the threat of nuclear war on children and adolescents. Boston,MA: IPPNW, 1985. Pp. 104-111. (b)

Wahlström, R. An enemy image as a psychological antecedent of warfareand armament. In: Proceedings of the Congress of European Psy-chologists for Peace. Helsinki: Finnish Psychological Society, 1987. Pp.144-149.

Wahlstrom, R. Growth towards peace and environmental responsibility.Jyv4skyla, Finland: Institute for Educational Research, 1991.

Wahlstrom, R. Promoting commitment to peace and environmental re-sponsibility. Peace, Environment and Education, 1992, 3(1), 33-43.

Waldron, I. et al. Activism against nuclear weapons build-up. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 1988, 18, 826-836.

Wallinga, C. et al. Children and nuclear war: Reviews of research. Child-hood Education, 1991, 67(4), 260-263.

Walsh, R. Staying alive: The psychology of human survival. Boston, MA:New Science Library, 1984.

Walsh, R. Psychology of peace. In: Laszlo, E. & Yoo, J.Y. (Eds.) Worldencyclopedia of peace. Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1986. Pp.304-307.

Walsh, R. Toward a psychology of human survival: Psychologicalapproaches to contemporary global threats. American Journal of Psy-chotherapy, 1989, 43(2), 158-180.

Watanabe, P.Y. & Milburn, M.A. Activism against Armageddon: Somepredictors of nuclear-related political behavior. Political Psychology,1988, 9, 459-470.

Watkins, D. & Sampson, J. The attitudes of New South Wales secondarypupils towards various social issues. Australian & New Zealand Journalof Sociology, 1975, I 1(3), 69-71.

Watkins, M.M. Moral imagination and peace activism: Discerning the innervoices. Psychological Perspectives, 1985, /6(1), 77-93.

Watkins, M.M. Imagination and peace: On the inner dynamics of promo-ting peace activism. Journal of Social Issues, 1988, 44(2), 39-57.

51

Wegener-Spohring, G. War toys and aggressive games. Play & Culture,1989, 2(1), 35-47.

Weiss, D.K. Effects of a nuclear education program on nuclear an.xiety andhopelessness in adolescents. (Ph. D.) California School of ProfessionalPsychology, San Diego, 1989. 151 pp. (50/11B, p. 5338. 89-25405.)

Wellington, J. Including the nuclear issue in the school curriculum: Abalanced approach. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1985, 15(3), 127-133.

Werner, P.D. & Roy, P.J. Measuring activism regarding the nuclear armsrace. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49, 181-186.

Wessels, M.G. Building peace psychology on a global scale: Challenges andopportunities. The Peace Psychology Bulletin, 1992, 1(3), 32-44.

Westin, C. Majoritet om rninoritet: En studie i etnisk tolerans i 80-taletsSverige. /The majority about minorities: A study of ethnic tolerance inSweden during the 80s./ Stockholm: Liber, 1984.

Westin, C. Tortyr och existens. /Torture and existence./ Goteborg: Korpen,1989.

Westman, A.S. & Lewandowski, L.M. How empathy, egocentrism,Kohlberg's moral development, and Erikson's psychosocial developmentare related to attitudes toward war. Psychological Reports, 1991, 69(3,Pt 2), 1123-1127.

Wetzel, N.A. & Winawer, H. The psychosocial consequences of the nuclearthreat from a family systems perspective. International Journal of MentalHealth, 1986, 15, 298-313.

White, R.K. Nobody wanted war: Misperception in Vietnam and otherwars. (Rev. ed.) Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970.

*White, R.K. Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Sovietrelations. New York: Free Press, 1984.

White, R.K. Ten psychological contributions to the prevention of nuclearwar. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1985, 6, 45-61.

White, R.K. (Ed.) Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. NewYork: New York University Press, 1986.

White, R.K. Underestimating and overestimating others' fear. Journal ofSocial Issues, 1987, 43(4), 105-109.

53

White, R.K. Specifics in a positive approach to peace. Journal of SocialIssues, 1988, 44(2), 191-202. (a)

White, R.K. The stream of thought, the lifespace, selective inattention, andwar. Journal of Hwnanistic Psychology, 1988, 28(2), 73-86. (b)

White, R.K. Why aggressors lose. Political Psychology, 1990, ii, 227-242.

White, R.K. Enemy images in the United Nations-Iraq and East-Westconflicts. In: Rieber, R.W. (Ed.) The psychology of war and peace. NewYork: Plenum, 1991. Pp. 59-70.

White, R.K. Nuclear policies: Deterrence and reassurance. In: Suedfeld, P.& Tetlock, P.E. (Eds.) Psychology and social policy. New York:Hemisphere, 1992. Pp. 71-82.

Whiteley, Quest for peace: A filmlvideotape interview series. Irvine,CA: University of California, 1984.

Whiteley, J.M. The social ecology of peace: Implications for the helpingprofessions and education. Journal of Counseling and Development,1984, 63, 77-85.

Wiberg, H. Visions of the future: A cross-national survey. (Ph. D.)Lund: Lund Studies in Sociology, 1977.

Winnik, H.Z., Moses, R. & Ostow, M. (Eds.) The psychological bases ofwar. New York: Quadrangle, 1973.

Wollman, N. (Ed,) Working for peace: A handbook of practical psychologyand other tools. San Luis Obispo, CA: Impact Publishers, 1985.

Wollman, N. & Wexler, M. A workshop for activists Giving psychologyaway to peace and justice workers. Journal of Humanistic Psychology,1992, 32(4), 147-156.

Wrightsman, L.S. Parental attitudes and behaviors as determinants ofchildren's responses to the threat of nuclear war. Vita Humana, 1964, 7,178-185.

Yebio, B. Measuring "world citizen responsibility": A preliminary testbattery. Educational & Psychological Interactions (Malrnö, Sweden:School of Education), No. 34, 1970.

53

Yebio, B. "Varldsmedborgaransvar": NAgra drag i attitydutvecklingenunder grundskolealdern. /"World citizen responsibility": Some charac-teristics of the attitude development./ Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem(Mlm6, Sweden: School of Education), No. 168, 1972.

Yebio, B. Utveckling av globalt medansvar: Attityqer och attitydutvecklingpa lag- och mellanstadiet. /Development of global responsibility:Attitudes and attitude development in the lower and medium levels of thecomprehensive school./ Pedagogisk-psykologiska problem, No. 354,1978.

Zakrzewski, A.R. Attitude toward international affairs related to extent ofknowledge, personality factors, and democratic beliefs: A status study ofa specific group of high school seniors. (Ed. D.) Wayne State University,1971. 199 pp. (31/07A, p. 3432. 71-00466.)

Zawodny, J.K. (Ed.) Man and international relations. 1-2. San Fransisco,CA: Chandler, 1966.

Zeitlin, S.J. Intergenerational dialogue about global concerns. In: Staub, S.& Green, P. (Eds.) Psychology and social responsibility: Facing globalchallenges. New York: New York University Press, 1992. Pp. 381-395.

Ziv, A., Kruglanski, A.W. & Shulman, S. Children's psychological reac-tions to wartime stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1974, 30(1), 24-30.

Zlate, M. Psychological guide marks for a possible pedagogy of peace.Revue Rotonaine des Sciences Sociales, Serie de Psychologie, 1988,32(1), 77-81.

Zur, 0. Neither doves nor hawks: Marking the territory covered by thefield of psychology of peace and war: 1. Contemporary Social Psycho-logy, 1987, /2(3), 89-100.

Zur, 0. War myths: Exploration of the dominant collective beliefs aboutwarfare. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 1989, 29, 297-327.

Zur, 0. On nuclear attitudes and psychic numbing: Overview and critique.Contemporary Social Psychology, 1990, 14(2), 96-110.

Zur, 0. & Morrison, A. Gender and war: Reexamining attitudes. AmericanJournal of Orthopsychiatry, 1989, 59, 528-533.

Zweigenhaft, R.L. Providing information and shaping attitudes aboutnuclear dangers: Implications for public education. Political Psychology,1985, 6, 461-480. (a)

55

-4

54

Zweigenhaft, R.L. Race, sex, and nuclear war. Genetic, Social, and GeneralPsychology Monographs, 1985, ///, 283-301. (b)

Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Nuclear knowledge and nuclear anxiety: A cross-cultural investigation4ournal of Social Psychology, 1986, 126, 473-484.

Zweigenhaft, R.L. et al. Images of nuclear activists in four countries. Jour-nal of Psychology, 1989, 123(4), 339-356.

Alvik, T. The development of views on conflict, war and peace amongschool children. Journal of Peace Research, 1968, 5, 171-195. (a)

Alvik, T. The problem of anxiety in connection with investigations con-ceming children's conception of war and peace. Scandinavian Journal ofEducational Research, 1968, 12, 215-233. (b)

EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION AND DEBATE

Some examples of earlier volumes in related areas:

61. Galtung, J. Schooling, education and the future.62. Bjerstedt, A. Future consciousness and the school.81. Bjerstedt, A. Peace education in different countries.89. Bjerstedt, A. Perspectives on peace education: Interviews with experts from fourteen countnes.94. Bjerstedt. A. Education for peace: Ten voices.96. Bjerstedt, A. Comprehensive peace education: A bibliography.97. Bjerstedt, A. Peace education around the world.

Order from: School of Education, Box 23501, S-20045 MalmO, Sweden.

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

5 7

ISSN 0479-7736