NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its...
Transcript of NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its...
![Page 1: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL
Council Chambers 18 July 2019
I wish to inform you that the 526th Meeting of the TRAFFIC COMMITTEE will be held in the Supper Room, North Sydney at 10.00am on Friday 26 July 2019 when your attendance is requested.
Your attention is directed to the accompanying statement of the business proposed to be transacted at such meeting.
KEN GOULDTHORP GENERAL MANAGER
BUSINESS
1. MinutesConfirmation of Minutes of the previous Meeting held on 14 June 2019.(Circulated)
![Page 2: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INFORMATION SHEET
Attending Traffic Committee Meetings
October 2018
The North Sydney Traffic Committee is not a Committee of North Sydney Council, but a
Committee set up as a requirement of Roads and Maritime Services (RMS).
Council has been delegated certain powers from RMS with regard to traffic matters upon its
local roads. A condition of this delegation is that Council must take into account the Traffic
Committee recommendations.
There are four permanent members of the Traffic Committee, each of whom has a single vote
only. The members are:
1. NSW Police
2. Roads and Maritimes Services
3. State Member of Parliament (for the location of the issue to be voted upon)
4. North Sydney Council
Council operates its Traffic Committee on the basis that the single Council vote, upon any
issue, is determined by the majority vote among those Councillors present at the meeting.
Generally, the Mayor chairs Traffic Committee meetings; however, in the Mayor’s absence it
is customary for a pre-elected Councillor to take the chair.
Traffic Committee meetings are held on Fridays. Meeting agendas and reports are published
on Council’s website on the Thursday before the meeting.
Council allows the members of the public to attend and speak at Traffic Committee meetings.
Members of the public gallery are requested to switch off mobile phones for the duration of
the meeting.
Individuals or groups wishing to address the Traffic Committee on a particular item must
register to speak before 5pm on the day prior to the meeting (Thursdays) by contacting
Council’s Traffic Planning Assistant on 9936 8244, or by notifying the officer outside the
meeting venue between 9.40am and 9.55am.
Such items will then be brought forward, in Agenda order, and dealt with before items in
which there is no interest from the public gallery.
As the Chairperson calls the brought forward items on the Agenda, speakers are invited to
stand at the Committee table.
The following points should be noted by members of the public wishing to address the
Traffic Committee:
Addresses must relate to an item on the Agenda;
Addresses should be limited to three (3) minutes, with a possible extension of time at the
discretion of the Chairperson;
![Page 3: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Attending Traffic Committee Meetings Page 3
October 2018
Addresses should be made to “Mayor, Councillors and Committee Members”;
If you have previously addressed the Traffic Committee on the subject then any further
address must be made to present new information ONLY;
Groups, or persons wishing to present similar points of view, should nominate a
spokesperson - not address the Traffic Committee individually; and
Having made your address and answered any questions put to you by the Committee, you
may take no further part in the debate.
All questions and comments are to be addressed through the Chairperson who will indicate
who is to speak next.
When all representations have been heard, the Traffic Committee will be asked by the
Chairperson for a resolution to determine the matter whilst the interested parties are present at
the table.
After the Traffic Committee has made its determination, the Chairperson will ask speakers to
resume their seats in the gallery and the same process will be repeated for subsequent items.
All Traffic Committee resolutions are referred to the full Council for their approval. The
recommendation sent to the full Council is the recommendation that has the majority vote of
the four permanent members of the Traffic Committee. If Council wishes to proceed contrary
to the majority vote, the RMS and Police have the right to appeal Council’s decision before
the Regional Traffic Committee. Council must notify the RMS and the Police and give them
14 days to decide whether they propose to lodge an appeal on the matter in question.
Any action relative to any issue under appeal to the Regional Committee must then cease
until the matter is determined.
The Sydney Regional Traffic Committee is chaired by an independent chairperson and
submissions and representations are welcomed from all interested parties.
For more information regarding Conduct at Traffic Committee meetings refer to Council’s
Code of Meeting Principles and Practices available from Council’s website or contact
Council’s Governance and Committee Services Manager on 9936 8154.
![Page 4: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 / 7 / 19 Page No 4
2. Matters Arising from the Minutes
3. Matters Arising from Council Resolutions
4. Items for Consideration - see attached reports
Item No. Subject Page
4.1 Delegated Authority 18
4.2 Minor Parking Investigations 26
4.3 Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Parking Restrictions Survey
Results
30
4.4 North Sydney – Parking Area 10 – Parking Restrictions Survey
Results
82
4.5 North Sydney – Parking Area 21 – Parking Restrictions Survey
Results
110
5. Informal Items for Consideration - see attached reports
Item No. Subject Page
5.1 Abandoned Vehicles & Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
Report
127
5.2 Standing Item - Gerard Street and Macpherson Street,
Cremorne - Traffic Control Signals (TCS)
133
5.3 Standing Item - Military Road B-Line 134
6. Local Development Advisory Committee Items for Consideration
Nil
7. General Business
Signed ____________________________
Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic & Transport Operations
Endorsed by Director of Engineering & Property Services
________________________
Duncan Mitchell
![Page 5: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 5
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. (4.1) Delegated Authority
Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic & Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads and Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members. Recommending: 1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.
3. (4.2) Minor Parking Restrictions
Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp Attached is a list of recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions. Recommending: 1. THAT the recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions be received.
4. (4.3) Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu A parking survey Cremorne Parking Area 26 was sent out on the 8 November 2018 to 1841 residents and property owners, and to Brightmore and Parks Precinct. The survey was also available online. Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the average response rate of 10 to 12% for parking surveys. The answers received from the residents for the Cremorne Parking Area 26 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in Cremorne Parking Area 26 are also attached. Recommending: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for Cremorne Parking Area 26. 2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in Cremorne Parking Area 26. 3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation in Cremorne Parking Area 26.
5. (4.4) North Sydney Parking Area 10 – Survey Results
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart A parking survey for a section of North Sydney Parking Area 10 was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 1201 residents, businesses, and to Edward Precinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 9%, which is slightly lower that the average response rate of 10 to 12%.
![Page 6: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 6
The answers received from the residents for the North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the North Sydney Parking Area 10 are also detailed in the report. Recommending: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations forNorth Sydney Parking Area 10.2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restrictionchanges in North Sydney Parking Area 10.3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the dateof installation in North Sydney Parking Area 10.
6. (4.5) North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey ResultsReport of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie WishartA parking survey for a section of Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 293 residents, businesses, and to HayberryPrecinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40responses were received. This represents a response rate of 13.7%, which iswithin the average response rate of 10 to 12%.The answers received from the residents for the Crows Nest/North SydneyParking Area 21 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changesto the parking restrictions in the Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 arealso detailed in the report.Recommending:1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations forNorth Sydney Parking Area 21.2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restrictionchanges in North Sydney Parking Area 21.3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the dateof installation in North Sydney Parking Area 21.
INFORMATION ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
7. (5.1) Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark RichardsonReport of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the reporting period of 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019.Year to date (2019) Council had investigated 247 reports of abandoned vehicles. Year to date (2019) Council processed 49 reports of unattended boat trailers. Recommending:1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report be received.
8. (5.2) Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne -Traffic Control Signals (TCS)Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday
![Page 7: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7
At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation of the North Sydney Traffic Committee: 1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a high priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to construction.At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended: 1. THAT Gerard Street/ Macpherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing item on future Traffic Committee agendas.The table below provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each milestone for the project.
Date Project status April 2019 Consultant brief and request for quotation completed. Quotation
assessment and engagement of a contractor is scheduled for early May 2019.
May 2019 Site survey completed. Consultant quotations to undertake design have been received and are being assessed.
June 2019 Consultant has commenced concept design and traffic assessment. The drafts are scheduled for completion in early August 2019.
Recommending: 1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic Control Signals Standing Item be received.
9. (5.3) Standing Item - Military Road B-LineReport of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela KempAt the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019, it was agreed to add astanding item for each future traffic committee agenda with regard to B-Line,including matters concerning off-set parking arrangements due to parking lossesalong Military Road, and general traffic and parking matters that arise.The table overleaf outlines the status of current traffic and parking mattersrelating to B-Line.Recommending:1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line bereceived.
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Nil
![Page 8: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DECISION OF 3720th COUNCIL MEETING
HELD ON MONDAY 24 JUNE 2019
179. EPS01: Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019
(This Item was considered en globo. See page 163)
Report of Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations
This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee
held on 14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.
The full reports to Traffic Committee can be accessed at:
https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffi
c_Committee/2019/14_June_2019
Recommending:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received. (4.1)
2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to proposed speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)
3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)
4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report be received. (5.1)
5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic Control Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)
6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received. (5.3)
7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be expedited. (5.3)
8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street survey. (5.3)
9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)
10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting
and answering questions. (5.3)
11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor
Vehicles Excepted previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to
only the northern side of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and
Ellalong Road, and a further report be submitted to the Committee.
12. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this
resolution.
13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further
action taken.
14. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.Voting was as follows: For/Against 10/0
Councillor Yes No Councillor Yes No
Gibson Y Barbour Y
Beregi Y Drummond Y
Keen Y Gunning Y
Brodie Y Mutton Y
Carr Y Baker Y
RESOLVED:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received. (4.1)
2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to
proposed speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)
Page 8
![Page 9: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being
undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed
cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)
4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat
Trailers Processed Report be received. (5.1)
5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic
Control Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)
6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be
received. (5.3)
7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be
expedited. (5.3)
8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street
survey. (5.3)
9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding
options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)
10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and
answering questions. (5.3)
11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles
Excepted previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the
northern side of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road,
and a further report be submitted to the Committee.
12. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this resolution.
13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further action
taken.
14. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.
Page 9
![Page 10: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ITEM EPS01 REPORTS 24/06/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L R E P O R T S
Report to General Manager
Attachments:
1. Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019
2. Traffic Committee Reports - 14 June 2019
SUBJECT: Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019
AUTHOR: Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations
ENDORSED BY: Duncan Mitchell, Director Engineering and Property Services
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee held on
14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.
The full reports to Traffic Committee can be accessed at:
https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffic_Com
mittee/2019/14_June_2019
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:
Nil.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received. (4.1)
2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to proposed
speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)
3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being undertaken
and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street,
McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)
4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers
Processed Report be received. (5.1)
5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic Control
Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)
6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received. (5.3)
7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be expedited.
(5.3)
8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street survey.
(5.3)
9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding options
for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)
10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and answering
questions. (5.3)
Page 10
![Page 11: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Report of Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations
Re: Traffic Committee Minutes – 14 June 2019
(2)
11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted
previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side of Fifth
Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further report be submitted
to the Committee.
12. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this resolution.
13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further action taken.
14. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.
Page 11
![Page 12: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Report of Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations
Re: Traffic Committee Minutes – 14 June 2019
(3)
LINK TO COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN
The relationship with the Community Strategic Plan is as follows:
Direction: 5. Our Civic Leadership
Outcome: 5.2 Council is well governed and customer focused
BACKGROUND
In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Principles and Practices:
Clause 51.6 - the minutes of a Committee meeting can only be confirmed and adopted by
resolution of that Committee, passed at a subsequent meeting of that Committee.
Clause 51.7 - the recommendations arising at Committee meetings are to be submitted to the
next available Council meeting for adoption.
CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS
Community engagement is not required.
SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT
The sustainability implications are of a minor nature and as such did not warrant a detailed
assessment.
DETAIL
This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee held on
14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.
The full reports to Traffic Committee can be accessed at:
https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffic_Com
mittee/2019/14_June_2019
Page 12
![Page 13: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Minute Book Page No 21
This is Page No 21 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North
Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.
NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL
REPORT OF 525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE
SUBJECT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMITTEE AT MEETING HELD IN THE SUPPER
ROOM AT THE ROS CRICHTON PAVILION, NORTH SYDNEY, ON
FRIDAY, 14 JUNE 2019 AT 10.00AM.
PRESENT
Councillor Gibson in the Chair, Councillor Keen.
Staff: Duncan Mitchell, Director Engineering and Property Services
Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations
Mark Richardson, Manager Ranger and Parking Services
Maria Coyne, Traffic Operations Officer
Stella Stefan, Road Safety Co-ordinator
Nathan Wu, Traffic and Transport Engineer
Iman Mohammadi, Traffic and Transport Engineer
Srikanth Shastry, Senior Strategic Transport Planner
Ian Curry, Manager Governance & Committee Services (Minutes)
Members: Felicity Wilson, Member for North Shore
Garvin Rutherford, representing Gladys Berejiklian, Member for
Willoughby
Sgt Ryan Edwards, NSW Police
Visitors: Lauren Ebbeck, TfNSW
Carl Yates, TfNSW
Apologies were received from RMS.
At the commencement of business (10.05am) Councillors present were:
Councillor Gibson in the Chair, Councillor Keen.
26. Minutes
The Minutes of the previous meeting held on 3 May 2019, copies of which had been
previously circulated, were taken as read and confirmed.
The Motion was moved by Cr Keen and seconded by Mr Rutherford.
Voting was unanimous.
Page 13
![Page 14: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 14//06/19 Page No 22
This is Page No 22 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North
Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.
27. 4.1 Delegated Authority
Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp
Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic &
Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads
and Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members.
Recommending:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.
The Motion was moved by Ms Wilson and seconded by Mr Rutherford.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.
28. 4.2 Union Street, McMahons Point – Proposed Speed Cushions – Survey Result
Report of Traffic and Transport Engineer, Iman Mohammadi
As part of the 2018/2019 implementation of North Sydney Council’s Local Area Traffic
Management (LATM) Action Plans, it is proposed to install traffic calming devices in
Union Street, McMahons Point. The issue of the speeding motorists was also raised at
the 519th Traffic Committee held on 7th September 2018 where the committee
recommended:
4. THAT Council urgently installs speed bumps along the road and also examine the
kerb blister on the corner of Union Street.
Community consultation took place from 13 March 2019 until 10 April 2019. 236
letters were sent to properties in the surrounding area, Union Precinct committee, and
the survey was available online through Council’s ‘Have Your Say’ webpage. A total
of 49 responses were received, including 4 from the outside survey area.
This report details the outcomes of the community consultation.
Recommending:
1. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to
proposed speed cushions in Union Street.
2. THAT Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street, McMahons
Point as per the attached plan.
A Motion was moved by Ms Wilson and seconded by Sgt Edwards,
1. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to
proposed speed cushions in Union Street.
2. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being
undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed
cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to
proposed speed cushions in Union Street.
2. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being
undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed
cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan.
Page 14
![Page 15: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 14//06/19 Page No 23
This is Page No 23 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North
Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.
INFORMAL ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
29. 5.1 Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson
Report of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the
reporting period of 11 April 2019 to 24 May 2019
• Year to date (2019) Council has investigated 195 reports of abandoned vehicles
• Year to date (2019) Council has processed 37 reports of unattended boat trailers
Recommending:
1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat
Trailers Processed Report be received.
The Motion was moved by Cr Keen and seconded by Ms Wilson.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat
Trailers Processed Report be received.
30. 5.2 Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne - Traffic
Control Signals (TCS)
Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday
At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following
recommendation of the North Sydney Traffic Committee:
1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a
high priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to
construction.
At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended:
1. THAT Gerard Street/ Macpherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing
item on future Traffic Committee agendas.
The report provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each
milestone for the project.
Recommending:
1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic
Control Signals Standing Item be received.
The Motion was moved by Mr Rutherford and seconded by Cr Keen.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic
Control Signals Standing Item be received.
31. 5.3 Standing Item - Military Road B-Line
Report of Traffic & Transport Operations Manager, Michaela Kemp
At the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019 it was agreed to add a standing item
for each future traffic committee agenda with regard B-Line, including matters
Page 15
![Page 16: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 14//06/19 Page No 24
This is Page No 24 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North
Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.
concerning off-set parking arrangements due to parking losses along Military Road,
and general traffic and parking matters that arise.
The table outlines the status of current traffic and parking matters relating to B-Line.
Recommending:
1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be
received.
Lauren Ebbeck and Carl Yates (TfNSW) addressed the Committee regarding the B-
Line project.
A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Ms Wilson,
1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be
received.
2. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be
expedited.
3. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street
survey.
4. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding
options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street.
5. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and
answering questions.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be
received.
2. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be
expedited.
3. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street
survey.
4. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding
options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street.
5. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and
answering questions.
GENERAL BUSINESS
32. Parking in Fifth Avenue and Montague Street
The Mayor referred to this matter, which is currently the subject of a community survey.
A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Mr Rutherford,
1. THAT Council restrict the three month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted
previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side
of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further
report be submitted to the Committee.
2. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this resolution.
Voting was unanimous.
Page 16
![Page 17: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 14//06/19 Page No 25
This is Page No 25 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North
Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted
previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side
of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further
report be submitted to the Committee.
2. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this resolution.
33. Parking Restrictions Cammeray Sports Complex
The Mayor referred to the submission made by Cammeray Croquet Club regarding
parking in Park Avenue and advised that a report would be submitted to the next
meeting.
34. Banners at Waverton Station
The Mayor tabled a petition regarding the Council banners at Waverton Station.
The Director Engineering and Property Services advised that the banners are changed
over every 3 months.
A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Ms Wilson,
1. THAT the petition be received and no further action taken.
2. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.
Voting was unanimous.
Resolved to Recommend:
1. THAT the petition be received and no further action taken.
2. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.
35. Grasmere and Young Street Intersection
Cr Keen advised that this matter had been discussed at the recent Willoughby Bay
Precinct Committee meeting and the Precinct Committee unanimously voted that the
signs be changed from Stop signs to Give Way signs so that the priority be changed to
favour Young Street.
The Manager Traffic and Transport Operations advised that a plan is currently being
prepared to change the priority at the intersection as previously resolved by Council,
including necessary changes to linemarking.
36. “Slow Down” Speed Campaign Signs
The Road Safety Co-ordinator demonstrated the new “Slow Down” Speed Campaign
signs, designed to wrap around trees or poles.
Council staff will assess the optimum and appropriate places to locate these signs.
The meeting closed at 11.37am.
____________________________ ________________________
CHAIRPERSON GENERAL MANAGER
A Page 17
![Page 18: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Item 4.1 - Traffic - 26/7/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L R E P O R T S
To the General Manager Attach: 1. List of Items
SUBJECT: (4.1) Delegated Authority
AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic &
Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads and
Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.
Page 18
![Page 19: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
APPROVAL FOR PROJECTS UNDER
DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO THE TRAFFIC & TRANSPORT OPERATIONS MANAGER
526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 JULY 2019
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
Resident Parking
Nil
Temporary Road Closures
19-061 Clarke Lane,
Crows Nest
Sydney Metro
Between
Clarke Street
and Pacific
Highway
Holtermann,
Tunks,
North Shore
Electorate
Temporary
Road Closure
1. THAT Council raise no objection to
the closure of Clarke Lane between
Clarke Street and Pacific Highway, Crows
Nest from ASAP to Friday 9th August
2019 from 24/7 for the purposes of
barriers to prevent incoming traffic
driving into Clarke Lane Bridge
Construction as per the submitted
application and subject to Council’s
standard road closure conditions.
Approval is subject to managed access to
all affected properties and the applicant
notifying all affected residents/tenants as
per Council’s standard conditions of
approval.
2. THAT should Council receive an
application for an alternative date to carry
out these works due to inclement weather
or operational delays, that application be
approved, subject to Police Permit
approval.
Yes 21/5/19 N/A
19-068 Denison
Street, North
Sydney
1 Denison
Street.
Between Berry
Street and
Spring Street
CBD,
Wollstonecr
aft,
North Shore
Electorate
Temporary
Road Closure
1. THAT Council raise no objection to
the temporary road closure of Denison St,
North Sydney from 23-25 May 2019 from
7pm-5am for the purpose of stormwater
diversion works, as per the submitted
application and council’s standard road
closure conditions. Approval is subject to
managed access to all affected properties
and the applicant notifying all affected
Yes 24/5/19
N/A
Page 19
![Page 20: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
residents/tenants as per Council's standard
conditions of approval.
2. THAT should Council receive an
application for an alternative date to carry
out these works due to inclement weather
or operational delays, that application be
approved, subject to Police Permit
approval.
19-069 Alexander
Lane, Crows
Nest
5-7 Alexander
Street.
Between
Falcon Street
and Hayberry
Street
Hayberry,
Wollstonecr
aft,
Willoughby
Electorate
Temporary
Road Closure
1. THAT Council raise no objection to
the temporary road closure of Alexander
Lane, Crows Nest on 24th June 2019 from
7am-5pm for the purpose of Standing a
crane for lifting and replacing roofing
sheets, as per the submitted application
and council’s standard road closure
conditions. Approval is subject to
managed access to all affected properties
and the applicant notifying all affected
residents/tenants as per Council's standard
conditions of approval.
2. THAT should Council receive an
application for an alternative date to carry
out these works due to inclement weather
or operational delays, that application be
approved, subject to Police Permit
approval.
Yes 27/5/19 N/A
19-070 McBurney
Lane, Kirribilli
42 Carabella
Street
Between Peel
Street and
Parkes Street
Bradfield
Victoria,
North Shore
Electorate
Temporary
Road Closure
1. THAT Council raise no objection to
the temporary closure of McBurney Ln
Kirribilli between Peel Street and Parkes
Street, on 20th June 2019 from 7:00am to
5:00pm for the purposes of lifting
construction materials into site with crane
as per the submitted application and
subject to Council’s standard road closure
conditions. Approval is subject to
managed access to all affected properties
and the applicant notifying all affected
Yes 3/6/19 N/A
Page 20
![Page 21: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
residents/tenants as per Council’s
standard conditions of approval.
2. THAT should Council receive an
application for an alternative date to carry
out these works due to inclement weather
or operational delays, that application be
approved, subject to Police Permit
approval.
19-071 Little Spring
Street, North
Sydney
88 Walker
Street.
Between Berry
Street and
Spring Street
CBD,
Wollstonecr
aft,
North Shore
Electorate
Temporary
Road Closure
1. THAT Council raise no objection to
the temporary road closure of Little
Spring St, North Sydney between Berry St
and Spring St on 17th-19th June 2019 from
9:30pm-5am for the purpose of
excavation for upgrade of the existing
Ausgrid electrical network, as per the
submitted application and council’s
standard road closure conditions.
Approval is subject to managed access to
all affected properties and the applicant
notifying all affected residents/tenants as
per Council's standard conditions of
approval.
2. THAT should Council receive an
application for an alternative date to carry
out these works due to inclement weather
or operational delays, that application be
approved, subject to Police Permit
approval.
Yes 3/6/19 N/A
Special Use Zones
19-058 Cambridge
Street,
Cammeray
18 Cambridge
Street
Bridgeview,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Motorbike
Parking
THAT Council installs a 2.5m Motorbike
Only space on the kerb space between the
driveways of 18 Cambridge Street and 12
Cambridge Street, Cammeray as per
attached plan.
Yes 21/5/19 7769080
Page 21
![Page 22: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
19-066 Zig Zag Lane,
Crows Nest
13 Ernest
Street,
Holtermann,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Timed
Loading Zone
THAT the existing Loading Zone on the
northern side of Zig Zag Lan between
Willoughby Lane and Zig Zag Lane be
restricted to “7am-5pm Mon-Fri, 8am-
12:30pm Sat” with additional “No
Stopping other times” to alleviate the
issue, subject to consultation with the
residents and business.
Yes 24/6/19 7711267
Structural Limit Signs
Nil
Warning Signs
19-059 Holtermann
Street, Crows
Nest
At the
intersection of
Alexander
Street
Holtermann,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Zig Zag Line
Marking
THAT Council raise no objection to
install Zigzag Line marking in addition to
the “Pedestrian Ahead” warning signs
(which were approved in 2017 by traffic
Committee through delegated Authority,
17/024) in Holtermann Street, in approach
to the Alexander Street roundabout. The
existing pedestrian crossing is located
immediately south of roundabout in
Alexander Street. It is claimed that drivers
looking to their right and turning left from
Holtermann Street into Alexander Street,
may not see/be aware of the pedestrian
crossing immediately after the roundabout
and have ended up with a sudden break.
The need of zig zag lines in addition to
the “Pedestrian Ahead” signs deems
necessary after the recent incidents in the
Crows Nest area with pedestrian fatalities.
Yes 13/6/19 7711205
19-062 High Street,
North Sydney
At the
intersection of
Alfred Street
North
Milson,
Victoria,
North Shore
Electorate
Install Caution
Driveway sign
THAT Council installs “Caution
Driveways” sign on the northern side of
High Street facing traffic departing from
the roundabout at the intersection of High
Street and Alfred Street North.
Yes 21/5/19 7774641
Page 22
![Page 23: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
19-065 Cremorne
Road,
Cremorne
Point
Western side
north of Rialto
Avenue
Cremorne
Point,
Victoria,
North Shore
Electorate
Install
“Merging
Traffic” sign
THAT Council installs “Merging Traffic”
sign on the western side of Cremorne
Road at approximately 32m north of
Rialto Avenue to warn motorists about
vehicles exiting the service road on the
lower level.
Yes 21/5/19 CRM
6976/2018
RMS additional
comments – can
we install give
way linemarking
at merge point
Signs Across Driveways
19-064 Falcon Street,
North Sydney
220 Falcon
Street, North
Sydney
Registry
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Signs across
driveway
THAT Council install No Parking signs
across the driveway to no. 220 Falcon St,
North Sydney.
No 7776567 RMS has
objected to this
TDA as Falcon
Street is a state
road.
Traffic Bollards
Nil
Construction Management Plan
19-054 Miller Street,
North Sydney
73 Miller Street CBD,
Wollstonecr
aft,
North Shore
Electorate
CTMP 1. THAT the traffic aspects of the
Construction Traffic Management Plan
prepared by “The Traffic Marshal Pty
Ltd” Rev 2, dated 24 April 2019 for
Development Application 173/18 at 73
Miller St, North Sydney be approved
subject to the conditions of approval.
2. THAT the Work Zones as described in
this CTMP are approved pending
lodgement of a Work zone application
and payment of all applicable fees. The
work zone hours must reflect the DA
approved hours.
Yes 27/5/19 7785140
19-068 Walker Street,
North Sydney
88 Walker
Street
CBD,
Wollstonecr
aft,
North Shore
Electorate
CTMP –
Excavation
Phase only
THAT the traffic aspects of the
Construction Traffic Management Plan
prepared by “Complete Staff Solutions”
Rev 7, dated 15 May 2019 for
Development Application 368/18 at 88
Walker St, North Sydney be approved
subject to the conditions of approval.
Yes 20/6/19 7775333
Page 23
![Page 24: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
19-079 Carabella
Street,
Kirribilli
85 Carabella
Street (Loretto)
Milson,
Victoria,
North Shore
Electorate
CTMP –
Demolition
Phase only
THAT Council approve the traffic aspects
of the Construction Traffic Management
Plan dated 30 May 2019 prepared by
McLaren Traffic Engineering for, and
limited only to, the demolition activities
of the approved development (SSD7919)
at 85 Carabella Street, Kirribilli subject to
the conditions of approval.
Yes 25/6/19 7793990
19-082 Military Road,
Cremorne
211 Military
Road,
Cremorne
Harrison,
Victoria,
North Shore
Electorate
CTMP
1. THAT the traffic aspects of the
amended Construction Traffic
Management Plan dated 17 June 2019
prepared by McLaren Traffic Engineering
for approved development (Development
Consent 163/17) at 211 Military Road,
Cremorne be approved subject to the
conditions of approval.
2. THAT the Work Zone on Military
Road as described in this CTMP is
approved under delegated authority of
Council’s Traffic Engineer, with the same
conditions pending lodgement of a Work
zone application and payment of all
applicable fees.
Yes 3/7/19 7790484
Australian Road Rules Compliance Signs
19-063 Carter Street,
Cammeray
At the
intersection of
Arkland Street
The Plateau,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Install Give
Way lines and
sings
THAT Council installs a Give Way line
and sign at the intersection of Carter
Street and Arkland Street, Cammeray.
Yes 21/5/19 7692488
Traffic Facilities
19/060 Young Street
and Grasmere
Road,
Cremorne
At the
intersection of
Young Street
and Grasmere
Road
Parks/Bright
more,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Speed
Cushions
THAT Council install six speed cushions
on approach to the intersection between
Grasmere Road and Young Street,
Cremorne, as shown on the attached plan.
Yes 27/6/19 7763607
Page 24
![Page 25: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
No. Street Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Electorate
Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments
19/067 Russell Street,
Wollstonecraft
Wollstonecr
aft,
Wollstonecr
aft,
North Shore
Electorate
Speed
Cushions
THAT Council installs two (2) rows of
speed cushions in Russell Street
Wollstonecraft to alleviate the speeding
issues in the street, after the affected
properties are notified by letterbox
delivery.
Yes 20/6/19 N/A
Council Decisions
19-081 Rowlison
Parade,
Cammeray
The eastern
side of
Rowlinson
Parade
The Bay,
Tunks,
Willoughby
Electorate
Footpath
Replacement
THAT Council proceed with footpath
replacement on the eastern side of
Rowlison Parade, Cammeray as shown on
the attached drawing. The design will
comply with RMS technical directions
and Australian Standards.
Yes 25/6/19 N/A
Page 25
![Page 26: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Item 4.2 - Traffic - 26/7/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L R E P O R T S
To the General Manager Attach: 1. List of Recommendations SUBJECT: (4.2) Minor Parking Restrictions AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER: Attached is a list of recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT the recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions be received.
Page 26
![Page 27: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
MINOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS
526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 JULY 2019
Street/
Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Issue/ Request Investigation Rec Signs &
Lines
Priority
Standard/
Guideline
ECM
1 Kiara Close,
North Sydney
Milson,
Victoria
Council has received
representations on behalf of
the Proprietors of Strata
Plan 36253 (1 Kiara Close)
enquiring why Council
doesn’t enforce the parking
restrictions in Kiara Close.
Kiara Close is a private road owner by
Proprietors of Strata Plan 36253.
Council benefits from separate Right of
Way easements over Kiara Close for
access and parking respectively. The
easements for parking only apply to
parts of Kiara Close, specifically the
sections which currently consist of
angle parking.
While there are permissive parking
signs in other parts of Kiara Close along
the access roads equivalent to about four
(4) parking spaces, these are contrary to
the terms of the easement which only
allow these areas to be used for vehicles
and pedestrians to pass over but not to
park.
Council’s Solicitor has advised that
because the easements are a private
Right of Way and not a public road, in
order for Council to enforce parking
restrictions in Kiara Close, Council
would need to enter into a formal
parking agreement with the Proprietors.
Council does not have a current parking
agreement with the Proprietors.
Furthermore, should the Proprietors
wish for Council to enforce the parking
on the easements that are currently only
designated for access, then the terms of
the Right of Way would need its terms
varied to allow or permit the parking of
vehicles.
THAT the information
concerning Kiara Close
be received.
N/A N/A 7808655
(MK)
Page 27
![Page 28: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Street/
Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Issue/ Request Investigation Rec Signs &
Lines
Priority
Standard/
Guideline
ECM
2 Parraween
Street,
Cremorne
Brightmore/
Harrison,
Tunks
At the Traffic Committee
meeting on 14/6/19 it was
resolved and subsequently
adopted by Council at its
meeting on 24/6/19:
THAT a brief report be
submitted to the next Traffic
Committee meeting
regarding options for
additional 15-minute free
parking on Parraween
Street.
Parking on Parraween Street is mostly 2
Hour Metered Parking 8.30am-6pm
Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat. Recent
inspections revealed that Parraween
Street has an average occupancy of 38%
during the day. Parking occupancy
increases significantly after 6pm when
the parking restrictions expire with
parking demand generated by visitors to
the local businesses and theatre and
residents.
Prior to the installation of the parking
meters in Parraween Street in 2010,
most of the on-street parking was 1
Hour Parking and the average parking
occupancy rate was 91.5%.
Parking demand can be influenced in
two ways, with time restrictions or
through cost disincentives (paid
parking). Using the pricing mechanism
to manage the parking resource means
that it is utilised more efficiently by
motorists.
Council generally aims for a maximum
occupancy rate of 85% to best make use
of the parking resource whilst still
ensuring motorists are able to find a
parking space.
Based on the current parking occupancy
rates in Parraween Street, there may be
scope to trial a period of free parking,
say the first 15 minutes, within the
existing parking restrictions to more
efficiently utilise the parking resource
particularly between 8.30am-6pm.
THAT should the Traffic
Committee support a trial
for a free parking period,
such as the first 15
minutes, at the parking
meters in Parraween
Street that a report be
prepared for Council
outlining the financial
implications prior to
Council making a
decision.
N/A AS2890.1
RMS Pay
Parking
Guidelines
7820815
(MK)
Page 28
![Page 29: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Street/
Location
Precinct,
Ward,
Issue/ Request Investigation Rec Signs &
Lines
Priority
Standard/
Guideline
ECM
Council’s parking meters have the
functionality to provide a period of free
parking which can be managed through
the integrated parking sensor
technology. Parking sensors are not yet
installed in Parraween Street due to the
amount of recent development
construction activity in the street over
the past few years which is now
reducing.
The suggested changes to the parking
fee structure will have financial
implications for Council and it may set
a precedent for the free parking to be
expanded to other streets. Therefore, it
is recommended that this be detailed in
a report to Council before any decision
is made to implement a free parking
period in Parraween Street.
Page 29
![Page 30: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Item 4.3 - Traffic - 26/0719
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L
To the General Manager
Attach: 1. Survey Results
2. Proposed Parking Changes
SUBJECT: (4.3) Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
AUTHOR: Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
A parking survey Cremorne Parking Area 26 was sent out on the 8 November 2018 to 1841
residents and property owners, and to Brightmore and Parks Precinct. The survey was also
available online. Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215
responses were received. This represents a response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the
average response rate of 10 to 12% for parking surveys.
The answers received from the residents for the Cremorne Parking Area 26 survey are
summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in Cremorne
Parking Area 26 are also attached.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for Cremorne
Parking Area 26.
2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in
Cremorne Parking Area 26.
3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation
in Cremorne Parking Area 26.
Page 30
![Page 31: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(2)
CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS
Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Egnagement
Protocol
Relates to ECM No: N/A
Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy
Signs & Lines Priority: 2
Precinct and Ward: Brightmore and Parks Precinct, Tunks Ward
Impact on Bicycles: Nil
Impact on Pedestrians: Nil
Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the
report.
DETAIL
Cremorne Parking Area 26 includes Belgrave Street, Ben Boyd Lane, Ben Boyd Road, Earle
Street, Grasmere Lane, Grasmere Road, Oaks Avenue, Park Avenue, Sutherland Lane,
Sutherland Street, View Street, Young Lane and Young Street.
A total of 1841 surveys were mailed out to residents and property owners, and to Registry
Brightmore and Parks Precincts on 8 November 2018. The survey was also available online.
Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215 responses were
received, including 101 hard copy responses and 114 online responses. This represents a
response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the average response rate of 10 to 12% for
parking surveys.
Survey Results
The answers received from Cremorne Parking Area 26 parking survey are summarised in
Attachment 1.
Precinct Comments
At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Brightmore and Parks Precinct
in relation to the survey.
Comments Received
Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have
been grouped by emerging themes.
Support Parking Restrictions
• Parking for residents and their visitors is very hard due to the number of commuters parking
in area 26. Also, customers of Oaks hotel and nearby restaurants. Restrictions need to cover
weekends and evenings up to 10pm.
• On Park Avenue retain the extended parking to 10 hours per day alongside the golf course
to allow commuters to park there and not on side streets. Extend hours of operation from
8:00 to 23:59 seven days per week.
Page 31
![Page 32: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(3)
• The Parking in Park Avenue at 8 hours has pushed people parking to go to work in to the adjoining streets - I would rather the parking limit was 10 hours to allow all day but not long-term parking at least on the golf course side of the road.
• Thank you for being aware of the parking nightmare in our area. It’s impossible for any visitors to find a parking spot as commuters are taking up all our parking spots all day. The ideal scenario would be 2-hour parking in all the streets with all residents with address ID allowed to park unrestricted.
The sports complex has caused road chaos due to them using the golf club access road. This only fits one car width & cars are reversing back into the oncoming traffic on park avenue.
• We need restrictions on out of area car owners parking long term, unmoved in free parking areas taking up the few spaces for residents & visitors.
This also should apply to commercial trailers, caravans, & camping vans.
• Parking in Cammeray Golf Club drive is inadequate for users for the Oval. There needs to be more parking available for users of the Oval, and the driveway needs to be restricted to golfers.
• Users of the Oval are taking up a lot of car spaces and causing problems for Cammeray Golf Club. It is a very dangerous driveway now. Parking should be restricted to golfers and users of the Club and more parking should be provided for users of the Oval.
• I do however, believe most to area 26 should be 2P (Resident permit excepted) to help with turnover. The current small unlimited parking sections should be maintained to help residence with extra cars. Extending restrictions into Saturday night will help when the streets are busy on the weekends.
• Conversely, we fully applaud restricting parking for 24 m on Park Avenue. We travel on that street every day and now that the road has been narrowed there is a lot of turnover of cars pulling in and out, holding up traffic. There is also regular opening of car doors without looking which not only holds up traffic but is dangerous.
• Parking meters will be a better solution.
• Weekends are a problem, we can rarely find parking in our street due to the children’s park across the street. Parking spaces are not demarked well at all, after the useless waste of space the bike path has caused.
• i recommend 4-hour parking as 2 hours is often insufficient time for visitors.• Eight-hour parking limits would exclude those who park vehicles for extended periods (eg
6 weeks) and go overseas, thus excluding others who need to park in the street.
• In Grasmere Road in Area 26 - On the left-hand side of road only some parts have restrictions. It would be better that from Ben Boyd Road to Park Street had the same restriction. Prefer 4-hour restriction or possible 2 hours. Right hand side the same or none. In View Street - No Parking - on one side. on the turn into Grasmere Road. It is an accident waiting to happen.
• i do object to long term parking by boat trailers, or similar- saw a horse float recently. Park
Avenue - between Ernest Street and Grasmere Road - is becoming more congested, maybe as a result of increased after school activities in Cammeray Park.
• 2-hour restricted parking required in this area. You claim to promote public transport, but you provide "externals" to park here all day.
• Parking meters/parameters would be welcome on Park Avenue - people park too close to street entrances at the moment. Oaks Avenue too busy on Saturdays with sport + Sutherland Rd for residents to find parking.
• Parking is increasing difficult as many commuters park in our street & walk up to Military Road & catch the bus to the city. Their cars are therefore here all day.
Page 32
![Page 33: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(4)
• We support 2-hour parking as a way to eliminate all day parking and, hopefully, free up
spaces for visitors, deliveries and emergencies. A good percentage of unrestricted parking
spots are used as all day or long-term parking. It is almost impossible to receive visitors,
especially the disabled, which include family. Our units have no designated visitor parking.
We recently had cause to consider a home visit from a doctor (no parking).
• I suggest that there would need to be uniformity of parking restrictions in the surrounding
streets as a 2-hour restriction in the neighbouring streets could result in a concentration of
vehicles in any one street with 4 hour restrictions.
P.S. An excellent initiative given the deteriorating parking conditions over the last 2-3
years.
• In summary we support extending the current arrangements on Park Avenue to 9 hours or
12 hours - attached letter provides more detail.
Thank you for the opportunity of providing feedback on the parking issues associated with
streets located in Parking Area 26 in the North Sydney Area. We are long-standing residents
in the area and have observed that the increase in commuter parking in our street, and those
streets close-by, correlates with Council erecting the 8-hour parking limit in Park Avenue.
We wish to put forward another solution which we believe will offset the pressure on
resident parking with competing commuter parking, and at the same time not require
additional parking restrictions or policing of parking by Council rangers. We propose that
the current parking arrangement down Park Avenue, on the Golf Club side be changed from
8 hours to 9 hours. Throughout the day on Mondays to Fridays this space is often left unused
as the 8-hour restriction does not allow enough time for commuters to leave their cars
without sanction. Therefore, the space is left empty, while commuters find space available
in our residential streets.
Working in the City and North Sydney CBD, we often return home by 5.30pm and with
few exceptions, the commuter cars have gone. Our observation is therefore that a 9-hour
parking space would allow commuters enough time to park and encourage use of this
otherwise unused space. We have enclosed a photo of the space identified, indicating the
lack of current use during weekdays. There are enough spaces available on the Golf Club
side to give the reprieve desired so that commuters stop parking in the side streets.
Alternatively, Council could consider changing the above-mentioned Park Avenue signage
to 12 hour anytime, consistent with parking restrictions enforced by Willoughby Council
along Lower Cliff Avenue off Tunks Park. This permits short term parking but limits the
use of space for longer-term parking for vehicles such as boats and trailers. Thank you for
your consideration of our proposal. We would be delighted to provide any further detail
and can be contacted on the numbers below.
Oppose Parking restrictions
• I’m quite happy with current setup. there is always plenty parking space around. i don't
think there is need to do any changes.
• I acknowledge that the area is becoming more densely populated. However, if I have a
guest to stay overnight, they are 1) not allowed to stay on strata property (by-laws), 2) don't
have resident parking permits if these roads are all changed to timed parking. Some streets
need to be left unmetered. Also, I know that commuters from Northern Beaches /Mosman
are abusing "free" untimed parking by using it all-day so that turnover for local businesses
is reduced. Either allow more resident parking permits for those of us to reside here or don't
increase timed parking please.
Page 33
![Page 34: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(5)
• please leave it all alone! it’s hard enough to find a space that's NOT already restricted
parking & those areas always have spaces available for residents with permits. Sometimes
we need street parking - we have a trailer, we sometimes need the garage for a few days to
store thing in temporarily etc and you make it all to hard (and expensive) to get a resident
permit. When i lived in Manly they had a permit you could lend to a visitor to hand on their
mirror and also trailer permits. If you MUST do anything at least do this as it will be a night
mare to (on occasion) have to park the car 1km+ away as we can’t leave it for long enough.
We had 2 cars while we were selling the old one, we don’t want hours of our time wasted
applying for permits; its LESS hassle to find a space! Sometimes my wife borrows a
Friend’s car and needs to park on the street. It’s NOT currently a problem. and to re-iterate
your criteria and cost for a permit is repressive. As noted, we want it all left alone, there is
already TOO MUCH resident permit parking in the area, for example Park Ave is usually
mostly EMPTY of cars as a result!
• Preference is to REMOVE parking restrictions from the area and to remove some of the
poorly placed "No Stopping" zone signs.
• NO parking restrictions at all, please.
• The current parking arrangements are working well.
• I would also like to have a few more all-day parking spots available. DEFINITELY no
reduction in them.
• The small number of unlimited spots currently available support carers parking.
• I have already applied for a parking exemption for area 26 and this was rejected. If changes
are made and I no longer can park in Oaks avenue next to other vehicles with a parking
exemption I will unfortunately have to sell up and move. This is not my desire as I really
enjoy the area where I have lived for over 20 years.
• I do not agree with further parking restrictions nor the installation of parking meters. It is
challenging to park in this area however the responsibility of residents to purchase a
property with the correct number of car spaces for their family and visitors if that's their
need. Streets belong to the community not to residents who happen to purchase with
insufficient car spaces. Honest to goodness isn't life stressful enough already without
additional ugly, parking signs and endless restrictions.
• I am happy with the current parking restrictions in place. On Sutherland Street in particular,
there are always free/available parking spots on our street.
• Yes. I am concerned about this survey. It would be really good if when asked to complete
a survey there was some genuine context around the survey - why it has come up, genuine
concerns of council, residents, businesses or "developers", council revenue, and exactly
what strategies are being proposed to address any foreseen parking/planning problems this
survey assumes in the "c" question for each street that I do want parking restrictions (during
certain times) - which I don't!.
I also very strongly disagree with the statement that the council cannot create extra parking
spaces - of course it can!
I would have thought that if an area is having an issue with parking the first question would
be why a change/increase in parking usage??? If you actually know where the extra parking
demand is coming from, then the council will be in a much better position to come up with
a successful solution!! For example, if demand is due to use of Sports facilities - when is
most demand? Who is using the facilities?? what type of parking do they need? what are
their actual transport needs? Is facilitating more parking going to address the issue??
Similarly, if the issue is parking for shoppers or commuters - then when, why how many,
questions are again very important to consider! if there is to be some proposed future
development of Neutral Bay shopping area (as foreshadowed in a council survey last year)
then what parking and transport options will be included in the development?? If there is
going to be a construction phase in the area (e.g. the tunnels) then what parking measures
Page 34
![Page 35: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(6)
need to be incorporated into the project during the construction phase when workers may
need to park in the area or extra buses put on to transport them to trains etc.?? I am
personally concerned about having parking restrictions - as under North Sydney's parking
permit rules I don't qualify for a parking permit at all!! (I bedroom and 1 car).
Also, in the event the State Govt goes ahead with plans for the tunnels they want to build
at Warringah Freeway Exchange. can it please incorporate a huge green space that covers
the freeway (i.e. not just a foot path) and includes parking for commuters in the void
between the freeway and green space on top. How awesome would it be if the North Sydney
community had a green space that extended from the leafy suburb of Crows Nest from
Anzac Park, over the freeway, through Cammeray Golf Course and on down to Primrose
Park and Middle Harbour Foreshore with a pedestrian access through Fall St to link the
green areas up the council could get a lot of cars parked inside the void above the freeway
and the greenery could help manage pollution from car fumes....while also providing a
magnificent space for the community to enjoy. (cycle ways included - of course!) looking
forward to North Sydney council moving forward with more innovate solutions so we can
all continue to thrive and enjoy our very special part of the World!!
• 1) We have no issue with the current parking restrictions. There is a good mix of restricted
and unrestricted parking and the 6pm Friday ends mean that we can enjoy visitors without
worrying that they will be booked.
• any changes on Young Street should not extend down the hill past Grasmere Road as there
are no commuters parking this far down Young Street.
• This end of Young Street is not congested during week days and is one of the few remaining
streets left with all day free parking for residents and their guests. Changing this will affect
my guests and the owner's future ability to attract other leaseholders. I often work from
home and clients visit me for longer than 2 hours. This will be problematic if no all day
free parking is available. I have lived at this address for over ten years and have observed
no change in the parking options on weekdays and see no reason to alter this. It is too far
for CBD commuters to park and walk to Military road (20 mins up hill) and has not attracted
commuters thus far. It is easy to park here during the week and should remain so.
Introducing paid limited parking would in fact drive me out of this street to live elsewhere.
• i thought it would be best to leave the existing.
• No parking restrictions needed on Earle Street.
• My preference to retain existing restrictions, particularly on Grasmere Road is purely
because i have 1x car + 2 motorbikes and current rules prevent enough resident permits for
all 3. Motorbikes take up 1/6 of the space of a car, and yet are treated the same which is
absurd. One way to address this would be a Grasmere Rd bike parking section on the
children's park end. Thank you.
• Some years ago, a number of residents - 25 Grasmere Rd to Park St, managed to influence
council to put 2 hour parking restrictions signs in front of their properties. Grasmere road
had always been unrestricted parking. this was done for purely selfish reasons - all these
properties have garages. Recently there have been a number of renovations to apartments
going on and the tradies and their vehicles have had unnecessary endless moving of trucks.
In order to comply with restrictions - *This area of Grasmere Rd should revert to
unrestricted.
• As the parking has already been reduced by the "gardens" replacing parking spaces, and
most of the area is 2hr parking or less, further restrictions would be extremely detrimental
to the area.
• 2. Please do not impose any parking restrictions at all in Young St North of its intersection
with Earle Street, Nor in Little Young Street.
Page 35
![Page 36: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(7)
• In my view the problems with parking have in fact been caused by the Council due to 1,
Continued increase in population density allowed by new development approvals 2, The
narrowing of roads is "beautification" which has decreased available parking spaces 3, New
developments without sufficient parking or visitor spaces. Further parking restrictions will
just increase the volume of traffic, increase enforcement costs and become complex to
manage without any clear benefit to residents.
• I have only commented on local streets to me. My answer is based on other changes in
street nearby not dramatically changing. If for instance this did occur and lots more cars
were channelled to our street, then i may well change my answers. I have answered on the
assumption that no significant changes are made to other parking in Grasmere Road/Park
Avenue. For these reasons please keep me informed as to any expected future changes.
Oppose Meters
• no meters ever.
• No meters and no parking restrictions at all.
• The suggestions of parking meters in residential streets sounds more like a revenue raising
exercise, rather than a management tool to reflect concerns from residents and parking
issues. Given that the council removed a parking space in our street a year ago to enable
further landscaping for a bicycle lane, these recommendations from council acting on
'residents concerns' sounds flimsy.
• However, if changes are made, they should not include parking metres. This is purely
revenue raising and no more effective than time limited parking.
• Parking meters in a residential area is ridiculous. It’s fine the way it is. We do not do not
want parking meters or any further restrictions.
• Please do not install parking meters, it makes it more difficult for guests of residents to
visit.
• I object to Council trying to divide our community. Technically I have 2 off street parking
spaces but only the driver’s side door can be opened and then only halfway. Access is
narrow and unable to be used by my wife, daughter or visitors. I use the street parking to
safely load and unload my grand-daughter as well as my shopping. Our visitors should not
have to pay at parking meters and should not be restricted to 30 visits a year.
• Please no parking meters in our area.
• I am NOT in favour of introducing parking meters to residential areas/streets. These streets
are made up of houses and apartments, not shops and restaurants. It is completely
unnecessary to introduce parking meters and would be unreasonable to ask guests or
visitors of ours to have to pay for parking on a residential street.
We already have an unwanted bike path that no one uses, please don't now introduce
unnecessary parking meters at residents’ cost.
• I am strongly against introducing parking meters to area 26. They are an inconvenience for
residence guests and trades people.
• I strongly oppose introduction of parking meters in this residential area. I query the
justification for any changes and would be interested to find out more on the number and
substance of the complaints made leading to the Council considering the introduction of
parking meters. Parking meters are an eyesore and have no place in residential streets.
Please keep me informed on the progress of the proposal and I look forward to receiving
details of further community consultation on this matter.
• We rarely have issues with being able to park in our street. We are concerned that by
making extensive areas metred this would push residents without permits and non-residents
Page 36
![Page 37: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(8)
into non-metred areas. We live on the eastern side of the street and we are concerned that
this would make it harder for us to park outside our house.
• My visitors will not visit if they have to pay for parking in my street.
• I hate parking meters! Please do not allow more to breed. You could easily make more
parking spaces available by modifying garden kerbs in Sutherland St bicycle lanes and
sensible placing of "no parking" signs in Ben Boyd Road.
• No more parking metres please. First Council being very very greedy. We pay enough
Council Rates as it is.
• No parking meters Existing restrictions are sufficient.
• Why do we need parking meters!
• Do you know there are NO parking meters in the shire?
• There is no need to change parking restrictions and definately no metres. That will have no
greater impact and is revenue raising.
• No parking meters, thank you.
• Parking meters around shopping precinct may be appropriate, but not in the residential
surrounds.
• I do not think it is in anyone's interest to put in parking meters in any of these streets. Too
much money spent on bike tracks (Sutherland Street) and bikes still remain on roads and
foot paths! Seems meters only benefit to repay money spent on bike tracks.
• Definitely not. Parking metres will just be money making exercise for Council.
• 1. Rates are increasing more than enough. Please do not add punitive parking metres.
Enforcement
• More enforcement is also needed. Thank you.
• Maybe greater policing by parking officers in the area in question would help car turnover.
• It is increasingly obvious that parking restrictions are ignored by the general public in this
area. Rangers very rarely patrol so the restrictions are only enforced when he council is
made aware of vehicles in the street for extended periods of time. As a resident who as to
pay for a parking permit, this is extremely annoying and frustrating.
• More rangers in the street would be helpful.
• Why don't you put officers around Woolworths parking area to keep it for shoppers and not
for the people who work in the area??? And park for the whole day???
• Parking restrictions only work if they are enforced regularly.
Parking Permits/Parking Areas
• I did not select any of the options in the questionnaire apart form question 9 because there
are no options that I liked. Under the current eligibility of permit, extending parking
restriction and introducing parking meters are not going to make the residents' life any
better but worse.
It has been difficult finding a non-restricted parking spot when I come home every day
anytime between 8.30am-6pm and it has been extremely inconvenient as a resident. When
the visitors parking spots at our unit block are all taken, our visitors including families and
relatives would struggle to find a parking spot.
There have been some changes made on our streets in the past, such as installing the bike
lanes and changing non-restricted parking spots to 2hr limited spots, I assume to improve
everyone's life. Personally, I find those changes unsatisfying, I feel more restricted and
have made our life harder since it simply meant that we lost the non-restricted parking
spots.
Page 37
![Page 38: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(9)
I believe any residents of the area should be entitled to share the off-street parking
regardless of whether they have a garage/car space in their property or not. Residents
of this area should all equally have the right to share the off-street parking. I believe it
is fair if the council provides one permit per house hold regardless of owning a vehicle
or not, but the second or more permits should be purchased.
Therefore, my preferred changes are:
One permit per household to be distributed, second permit and on to be purchased.
Once the residents have received the permit, parking time restrictions such as 2hrs, 3hrs
to be introduced.
I strongly hope that North Sydney Council will come up with a decision that puts the
residents' convenience first. Thank you.
• The current mayor campaigned at the last election not to be so reliant on parking meter
revenue. By forcing residents to pay for parking permits (additional revenue for a
sticker, we already pay council rates) and / or resident's guests, visitors, friends, nanny's
etc to pay for parking when visiting doesn't seem to reflect this.
• It is noteworthy that removing restrictions for residents and ratepayers without an
additional charge doesn't seem to have been considered an option for this survey.
I am reluctant to support parking restrictions, and if necessary, would prefer the model
used in the Northern Beaches. Residents should not be charged for a parking permit.
Ratepayers are already paying.
Like in the Northern Beaches, parking permits should be handed out to ratepayers and
residents for use on motor vehicles (limit of 2). This would then allow 2-4hr parking
restrictions to be ramped up across the council area to 24x7 Mon-Sun to directly target
and impact non-resident commuter parkers, trailers, boats and commercial vehicle
parking.
We do seem to be in a transition period where over several years the Council is slowly
increasing the number of restricted spaces, pushing residents, commuters, trailers,
shoppers and pub drinkers at The Oaks into the remaining and ever reducing number of
unrestricted spaces. Parking space use on Saturday and Sunday mornings show what
would be possible if the area were returned to only local resident use across 7 days.
Improving turnover seems to be a council goal, but how does turnover improve parking
for residents? It does not increase the number of spaces and simply requires shifting
vehicles by the clock. Turnover simply increases churn between spaces.
Removal of long-term boat and trailer parking should be encouraged. This could be
achieved by a free resident parking permit that can be used on motor vehicles only.
• In addition, households should be allowed to purchase additional resident stickers.
• I do not support solutions that force residents to pay for parking through the purchase
of resident permit. If these are given for free to residents, I will support a change in the
parking restrictions.
• 2) We have attempted to receive a residents permit before but were rejected as our house
plans show a 2 car garage. We explained that it was actually only a 1 car garage due to
storage racks that had been inserted by the landlord but were still rejected. We found
this to be unfair, terribly inflexible and just plain petty. This policy/decision needs to
be reconsidered if such draconian measures such as parking meters are being
considered.
• As a rate payer we should be entitled to a resident parking permit in North Sydney and
be able to park in our own street without restrictions. Regardless whether you have i or
2 parking in your garage. Many of us have children with extra cars. Why should
someone outside our area have preference in front or near our residence?
All/most Units blocks in Sutherland St have resident parking + visitor parking -
therefore i see no reason to alter the stats.
Page 38
![Page 39: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(10)
• "Free" parking spots in our area are used all day, probably by commuters going to work all
day, probably by commuters going to work by bus - and leaving cars in our streets all day!
Unfair to residents and their visitors, especially ELDERLY people! and TRADESMEN!
Also: the 2 hour limited spots do NOT allow enough time for visitors (say for lunch)
particularly elderly! The council should provide PARKING AREAS elsewhere, near
PUBLIC TRANSPORT! This would further encourage use of PUBLIC TRANSPORT.
Please consider the Residents! Needs! Thank you!
• Everyone who lives in area should be eligible for resident parking permit holders like
Mosman Council issues.
• As a permanent resident i am unable to park in front of my residence as a cliff face is in
front of my residence and i have to park in front of my residence and i have to park on the
street being young street. It would be appreciated if a permanent parking sticker could be
issued to me and my tenants.
• While i note that any proposal changes would not affect my eastern side of young street
directly, this cash grab dressed as a community driven concern disgusts me. It's double-
dipping- lets increase our chances of income from parking tickets and parking meters &
continue to charge residents for permits to park outside their own home. Free parking for
rate payers please, as many other councils provide, and charge the commuters who park
here to catch the bus to town.
Other
• At the moment if a car parks and another is coming, I cannot proceed walking down the
lane. The footpath is overgrown and unusable. In addition, cars have difficulty passing in
both Young lane and Ben Boyd lane.
• It should be noted that Council removed a several spaces building the bike path and
landscaping on Sutherland Street. This has added to the issues in the street and for strata
schemes trying to manage visitor parking in their buildings. It's not uncommon for
commuters to use visitor parking spaces. The bike path also restricted the width of
Sutherland Street to the point where it's questionable whether it's even wide enough to
support two-way traffic.
Removing the bike path to permit 45degree angle parking would permit dozens and dozens
of cars to park, providing a greater utility to the local community than currently provided
by the poorly utilised bike path.
• Please find attached a letter on the subject. All praise to Council for the extent and
efficiency of the services it provides to residents, commerce and visitors to enjoy. I have
lived in Cremorne for 35 years and believe it’s an outstanding place for families and people
to enjoy. I’m trusting and hoping Council and traffic engineering is sighting against state
government to STOP the proposed Beaches link road tunnel.
An unnecessary and costly proportion which will forever change the nature of our suburb.
• If you are going to install parking meters in Grasmere lane you hopefully make it possible
by installing marked areas opposite SP 10060 & SP 14531. We normally could get 4 cars
parked over there, but often we get very selfish parkers, sometimes parked over there for
the whole day or even for days or months.
My other comments are the appalling and dangerous state the footpaths in the area are. I
am 77 and already had 2 falls on the Military road. First one i contacted the council, because
I ended up with a big hole in my pants. No following up! Council rates are going up and
we expect a safe way to walk to the shops, banks, restaurants etc. Specially the stretch in
Neutral Bay is a disgrace. Lots of elderly people live in this area.
• Please no more cycle paths such as Sutherland Street.
Page 39
![Page 40: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(11)
• I strongly believe it is important that residents receive a summary of this survey so all
residents can trust decisions by Council are made with this survey in consideration.
• Parking on Grasmere Rd between Young St and the bend before Ben Boyd Rd could be
rear to kerb on one side the street is more than wide enough to accommodate this and for
the cost of some signs and white paint would increase car spaces significantly.
• Parking near the corner of Ben Boyd Lane and Grasmere Lane has been restricted due to
the apparent need to clear the corner. This corner has been obstructed by the creation of a
drainage inlet which could be changed to a flat grid and a street sign. Changing these would
free up additional parking space. The property on the corner has been developed with the
corner restricted to allow for better access to the corner. This has been nullified by the drain
and street sign mentioned above.
• It is extremely hard to cross Military Road from Ben Boyd Road travelling south.
When travelling south there are cars parked on the left-hand side of Ben Boyd Road and
the area becomes very congested. I would like to request the area between Grosvenor Lane
and Grosvenor Street is made no parking day and night. It would free up a lane of traffic
and make it much easier to get through the lights and would also make it much easier for
traffic turning into Grosvenor Street and Grosvenor Lane travelling north. Crossing
Military Road should be made much easier.
• My daughter currently resides at the above address with a young family of 2 children. Entry
and exit from her car port entry in Grasmere Lane has become very dangerous with very
limited visibility on entry and exit and often speeding vehicles using Grasmere Lane. I
request Council to please urgently review safety options such as extending the No Parking
area in immediate proximity of the driveway or the erection of an effective Mirror so that
passing vehicles can be better sighted. My daughter has experienced several minor
accidents due to the poor visibility and we are fearful of the risk of serious injury.
• Bike riders aren’t using the bike lanes which is making streets like Sutherland incredibly
dangerous now that it has been narrowed. Do you plan on restricting bike riders to their
purpose built $5 million paths?
• There is an opportunity to increase the supply of on-street parking in Grasmere Road.
Between Young St and Park Ave the traffic is one way.
This would allow for the introduction of either 45/60/90 angled parking, most easily on the
first section west of Young St towards View St.
This would allow for greater capacity for residential parking here.
• Very difficult to see council wasting funds on that bike path that cyclists do not use and
still ride on the roads. Is the council planning to fine those cyclists for disrupting traffic
and endangering lives???????
• I think there is little we can about parking because more cars will be on our roads due to
our quickly growing population.
How about looking at population growth together with the federal and state governments
as part of the solution.
• I strongly object to the installation of bike tracks for a few privileged individuals, who do
not pay rego, or licence fees. Sutherland Road is way too narrow and getting out of a car,
on the driver’s side, is extremely dangerous. Think again.
• If you got rid of the bike paths there would be more parking and more pedestrian safety
• Is it possible to check who is responding to avoid special interest. In a presently unrestricted
section of Grasmere Road. we have at presents and for days at a time. I boat and a horse
float. Also, cans left by people going on holidays.
• Please review safety risks & total blunders created by recent roadworks on Sutherland
Street and Cammeray Golf Club driveway.
Page 40
![Page 41: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu
Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results
(12)
• Sutherland Street The installation of the dedicated BIKE PATH is a total waste of money
and inefficient. Reduced lanes for vehicles and flower beds creates a hazard for driving and
drop off. The BIKE PATH is rarely used - painted lines on the road would have served the
same purpose without the hundreds of thousand $ outlay.
• Council representatives advise that Sutherland St is no narrower than before construction
of the INFREQUENTLY USED bike path. Of this we are not convinced. We recently had
the side of our vehicle extensively damaged by a gentleman attempting to exit his parked
car.
We witnessed a delivery truck reversing down the bike lane in order to make a delivery (no
spot to park).
Vehicles stopping to drop off or collect passengers cause traffic disruption, and danger to
exiting or entering passengers, as there is rarely a vacant spot to pull into. Our part of
Sutherland St is now dangerous to traverse, as is the portion of Park Avenue between Ernest
Street and Sutherland Street.
• Not happy with useless bike paths in this area either!! Waste of rate money, unenforceable,
cyclists also tend to avoid paths!
• Council should restrict over development, not parking.
• There would be more parking available if Council stopped wasting money on turning
parking spaces into gardens which we didn't want, (area is now covered in weeds).
Discussion
The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in some streets.
Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Appendix 2. Overall,
there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 26 and as such no parking meters have
been recommended in Area 26.
Page 41
![Page 42: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Belgrave Street
1a) In Belgrave Street on the northern side, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 8 25% 4 13% 13 41% 7 22% 32 15%
Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 6 15% 4 10% 19 46% 12 29% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 6%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 7 16% 11 26% 21 49% 43 20%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 1 3% 2 6% 19 59% 10 31% 32 15%
Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 8%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 2%
Totals 24 11% 21 10% 101 47% 69 32% 215 100%
1b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 15%
Earle Street 3 25% 1 8% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 17 41% 0% 2 5% 0% 22 54% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 6%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 1 2% 0% 27 63% 43 20%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 15%
Anonymous 7 41% 0% 1 6% 0% 9 53% 17 8%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 2%
Totals 90 42% 5 2% 5 2% 2 1% 113 53% 215 100%
10pm
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Totals8pm No AnswerMidnight
Residential Street Address
Residential Street Address
Page 1
Page 42
![Page 43: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
1c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 2 6% 7 22% 12 38% 32 15%
Earle Street 5 42% 2 17% 0% 5 42% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 4 10% 15 37% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 0% 2 15% 7 54% 13 6%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 4 9% 1 2% 23 53% 43 20%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 15%
Anonymous 6 35% 3 18% 1 6% 7 41% 17 8%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 2%
Totals 92 43% 15 7% 18 8% 90 42% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 22 69% 10 31% 32 15%
Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 0% 3 75% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 4 10% 24 59% 13 32% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 6%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 2 5% 20 47% 21 49% 43 20%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 3 9% 17 53% 12 38% 32 15%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 8%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 2%
Total 12 6% 126 59% 77 36% 215 100%
Totals
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat TotalsNo AnswerMon-Sat
Yes No No Answer
Residential Street Address
Residential Street Address
1d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Belgrave Street.
Page 2
Page 43
![Page 44: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Ben Boyd Lane
2a) In Ben Boyd Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 0% 5 83% 1 17% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 7 22% 17 53% 5 16% 32 15%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 6 15% 4 10% 20 49% 11 27% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 5 38% 5 38% 13 6%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 3 7% 5 12% 15 35% 20 47% 43 20%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 2 6% 1 3% 19 59% 10 31% 32 15%
Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 8%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 2%
Total 22 10% 21 10% 108 50% 64 30% 215 100%
2b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 1 8% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 19 46% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 18 44% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 1 2% 0% 0% 27 63% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 3 9% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Total 89 41% 10 5% 4 2% 2 1% 110 51% 215 100%
10pm8pm Midnight No Answer
Support changes
No Changes No Answer
Totals
Totals2P 4P
Page 3
Page 44
![Page 45: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
2c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 2 33% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 18 56% 1 3% 1 3% 12 38% 32 15%
Earle Street 5 42% 2 17% 0% 5 42% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 21 51% 2 5% 3 7% 15 37% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 0% 2 15% 7 54% 13 6%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 17 40% 3 7% 1 2% 22 51% 43 20%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 3 9% 11 34% 32 15%
Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 8%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 2%
Total 101 47% 15 7% 11 5% 88 41% 215 100%
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 2 5% 27 66% 12 29% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 6 46% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 21 49% 21 49% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Total 11 5% 133 62% 71 33% 215 100%
2d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Ben Boyd Lane
No Answer Totals
Yes No No Answer Total Number
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat
Page 4
Page 45
![Page 46: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Ben Boyd Road
3a) In Ben Boyd Road, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 11 34% 16 50% 2 6% 32 100%
Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 6 15% 7 17% 23 56% 5 12% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 5 38% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 8 19% 7 16% 9 21% 19 44% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 18 56% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 29 13% 32 15% 100 47% 54 25% 215 100%
3b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 13 41% 0% 1 3% 0% 18 56% 32 100%
Earle Street 2 17% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 8 67% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 21 51% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 16 39% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 0% 0% 6 46% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 15 47% 4 13% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 1 20% 0% 0% 0% 4 80% 5 100%
Totals 92 43% 10 5% 5 2% 2 1% 106 49% 215 100%
10pm
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Totals2P 4P
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer
Page 5
Page 46
![Page 47: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
3c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 21 66% 4 13% 1 3% 6 19% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 2 17% 0% 6 50% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 27 66% 2 5% 4 10% 8 20% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 14 33% 5 12% 2 5% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 14 44% 3 9% 4 13% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 5 29% 4 24% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 104 48% 23 11% 13 6% 75 35% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 26 81% 5 16% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 3 7% 31 76% 7 17% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 8 62% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 2 5% 20 47% 21 49% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 17 53% 12 38% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 13 6% 137 64% 65 30% 215 100%
3d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Ben Boyd Road.
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
Page 6
Page 47
![Page 48: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Earle Street
4a) In Earle Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 3 50% 1 17% 6 3%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Ben Boyd Road 2 6% 9 28% 16 50% 5 16% 32 15%
Earle Street 1 8% 2 17% 8 67% 1 8% 12 6%
Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 2%
Grasmere Road 5 12% 6 15% 22 54% 8 20% 41 19%
Oaks Avenue 1 8% 1 8% 6 46% 5 38% 13 6%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%
Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 1%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 5 12% 10 23% 24 56% 43 20%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%
Young Street 1 3% 3 9% 19 59% 9 28% 32 15%
Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 11 65% 4 24% 17 8%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%
Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 5 2%
Totals 16 7% 30 14% 107 50% 62 29% 215 100%
4b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 9 28% 1 3% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%
Earle Street 6 50% 0% 0% 0% 6 50% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 1 2% 0% 18 44% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 1 2% 0% 0% 27 63% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 14 44% 4 13% 0% 2 6% 12 38% 32 100%
Anonymous 7 41% 2 12% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 3 60% 0% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 89 41% 12 6% 3 1% 2 1% 109 51% 215 100%
10pm
Support changes
No changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Totals
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer
Page 7
Page 48
![Page 49: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
4c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 5 83% 0% 0% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 19 59% 1 3% 1 3% 11 34% 32 100%
Earle Street 5 42% 1 8% 0% 6 50% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 24 59% 2 5% 4 10% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 0% 1 8% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 13 30% 3 7% 1 2% 26 60% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 2 12% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 3 60% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 104 48% 11 5% 10 5% 90 42% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 11 92% 1 8% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 2 5% 18 42% 23 53% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 19 59% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 11 65% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 8 4% 137 64% 70 33% 215 100%
4d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Earle Street.
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Page 8
Page 49
![Page 50: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Grasmere Lane
5a) In Grasmere Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 10 31% 16 50% 3 9% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 7 17% 5 12% 24 59% 5 12% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 7 16% 19 44% 13 30% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 20 63% 8 25% 32 100%
Anonymous 2 12% 3 18% 11 65% 1 6% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 1 20% 0% 3 60% 1 20% 5 100%
Totals 23 11% 29 13% 119 55% 44 20% 215 100%
5b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 12 38% 0% 1 3% 0% 19 59% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 17 41% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 17 40% 2 5% 0% 0% 24 56% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 19 59% 0% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 9 53% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 98 46% 8 4% 4 2% 2 1% 103 48% 215 100%
10pm Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer
Page 9
Page 50
![Page 51: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
5c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 22 69% 0% 1 3% 9 28% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 26 63% 1 2% 5 12% 9 22% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 16 37% 6 14% 2 5% 19 44% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 4 24% 1 6% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 3 60% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 112 52% 16 7% 13 6% 74 34% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 26 81% 6 19% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 2 5% 35 85% 4 10% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 26 60% 16 37% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 15 88% 2 12% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 4 80% 5 100%
Totals 9 4% 149 69% 57 27% 215 100%
5d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Grasmere Lane.
Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Page 10
Page 51
![Page 52: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Grasmere Road
6a) In Grasmere Road, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 2 6% 10 31% 16 50% 4 13% 32 100%
Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 9 22% 11 27% 20 49% 1 2% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 5 12% 4 9% 13 30% 21 49% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 3 9% 18 56% 9 28% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 11 65% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 1 20% 0% 2 40% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 25 12% 31 14% 104 48% 55 26% 215 100%
6b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
Column Labels
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%
Earle Street 2 17% 0% 0% 0% 10 83% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 23 56% 3 7% 3 7% 0% 12 29% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 19 59% 0% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 1 6% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 96 45% 5 2% 5 2% 3 1% 106 49% 215 100%
10pm
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Page 11
Page 52
![Page 53: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
6c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 20 63% 1 3% 1 3% 10 31% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 31 76% 3 7% 4 10% 3 7% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 0% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 14 33% 4 9% 1 2% 24 56% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 1 20% 2 40% 5 100%
Total 112 52% 14 7% 11 5% 78 36% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 2 5% 37 90% 2 5% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 20 47% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 9 4% 143 67% 63 29% 215 100%
6d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Grasmere Road.
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
Page 12
Page 53
![Page 54: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Oaks Avenue
7a) In Oaks Avenue, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 2 33% 1 17% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 6 19% 6 19% 15 47% 5 16% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 1 8% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 8 20% 3 7% 18 44% 12 29% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 1 8% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 1 25% 1 25% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 6 14% 13 30% 20 47% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 1 3% 19 59% 9 28% 32 100%
Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 32 15% 23 11% 99 46% 61 28% 215 100%
7b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 18 44% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 20 49% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 7 54% 2 15% 1 8% 0% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 1 3% 2 6% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 90 42% 6 3% 8 4% 2 1% 109 51% 215 100%
10pm
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Page 13
Page 54
![Page 55: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
7c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 15 47% 4 13% 3 9% 10 31% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 3 7% 16 39% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 9 69% 2 15% 2 15% 0% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 13 30% 6 14% 1 2% 23 53% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 4 13% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 6 35% 4 24% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 95 44% 24 11% 14 7% 82 38% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 2 33% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 3 7% 24 59% 14 34% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 9 69% 0% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 2 5% 18 42% 23 53% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 10 59% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 4 80% 5 100%
Totals 15 7% 126 59% 74 34% 215 100%
7d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Oaks Avenue.
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
Page 14
Page 55
![Page 56: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Park Avenue
8a) In Park Avenue, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 2 33% 1 17% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 7 22% 6 19% 14 44% 5 16% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 5 12% 7 17% 21 51% 8 20% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 0% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 6 14% 12 28% 21 49% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 4 13% 1 3% 18 56% 9 28% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 28 13% 28 13% 103 48% 56 26% 215 100%
8b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%
Earle Street 2 17% 0% 0% 1 8% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 19 46% 2 5% 1 2% 1 2% 18 44% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 7 54% 1 8% 2 15% 0% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 13 30% 2 5% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 2 6% 2 6% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 9 53% 0% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 90 42% 6 3% 8 4% 4 2% 107 50% 215 100%
10pm
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Page 15
Page 56
![Page 57: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
8c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 13 41% 4 13% 4 13% 11 34% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 27 66% 1 2% 2 5% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 8 62% 1 8% 2 15% 2 15% 13 100%
Park Avenue 3 75% 0% 1 25% 0% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 11 26% 7 16% 1 2% 24 56% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 4 13% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 100 47% 20 9% 15 7% 80 37% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 20 63% 11 34% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 10 83% 2 17% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 2 5% 29 71% 10 24% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 4 100% 0% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 3 7% 18 42% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 4 13% 18 56% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 17 8% 129 60% 69 32% 215 100%
8d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Park Avenue.
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
Page 16
Page 57
![Page 58: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Park Avenue - Drop-off and Pick-up Zone
Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 17 53% 12 38% 3 9% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 5 42% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 17 41% 15 37% 9 22% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 8 62% 1 8% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 3 75% 1 25% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 18 42% 6 14% 19 44% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 10 31% 13 41% 9 28% 32 100%
Anonymous 6 35% 5 29% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Total 85 40% 72 33% 58 27% 215 100%
9) In Park Avenue, I am in favour of introducing a 24m ‘No Parking 4:30–7:00pm, 2 Hour 8:30am–4:30pm permit holders excepted’ zone fronting Cammeray Park to
cater for children drop–off and pick–up at the park during the afternoon sporting events.
Yes No No Answer Total Number
Page 17
Page 58
![Page 59: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Sutherland Lane
10a) In Sutherland Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 2 33% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 9 28% 15 47% 5 16% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 7 17% 2 5% 21 51% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 1 8% 0% 7 54% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 6 14% 4 9% 17 40% 16 37% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 1 3% 1 3% 21 66% 9 28% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 10 59% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 24 11% 19 9% 110 51% 62 29% 215 100%
10b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 0% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 19 46% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 19 46% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 1 2% 0% 0% 27 63% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 7 41% 0% 1 6% 0% 9 53% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 93 43% 5 2% 4 2% 2 1% 111 52% 215 100%
10pm
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
Page 18
Page 59
![Page 60: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
10c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 20 63% 1 3% 1 3% 10 31% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 3 7% 15 37% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 20 47% 4 9% 1 2% 18 42% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 111 52% 12 6% 9 4% 83 39% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 6 50% 5 42% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 29 71% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 25 58% 17 40% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 11 65% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 4 80% 5 100%
Totals 10 5% 135 63% 70 33% 215 100%
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
10d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Sutherland Lane
Page 19
Page 60
![Page 61: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Sutherland Street
11a) In Sutherland Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 4 13% 10 31% 15 47% 3 9% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 1 8% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 7 17% 7 17% 17 41% 10 24% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 10 23% 13 30% 19 44% 1 2% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 1 3% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 2 12% 3 18% 9 53% 3 18% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 31 14% 38 18% 104 48% 42 20% 215 100%
11b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 12 38% 1 3% 1 3% 0% 18 56% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 1 2% 3 7% 0% 17 41% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 2 15% 0% 0% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 25 58% 3 7% 0% 0% 15 35% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 16 50% 1 3% 1 3% 2 6% 12 38% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 103 48% 10 5% 6 3% 2 1% 94 44% 215 100%
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
10pm
Page 20
Page 61
![Page 62: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
11c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 16 50% 6 19% 1 3% 9 28% 32 100%
Earle Street 6 50% 1 8% 0% 5 42% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 23 56% 1 2% 4 10% 13 32% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 8 62% 0% 2 15% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 25 58% 11 26% 4 9% 3 7% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 15 47% 2 6% 3 9% 12 38% 32 100%
Anonymous 7 41% 2 12% 1 6% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 113 53% 25 12% 15 7% 62 29% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 27 84% 4 13% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 9 69% 2 15% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 2 5% 39 91% 2 5% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 13 76% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 11 5% 161 75% 43 20% 215 100%
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
11d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Sutherland Street.
Page 21
Page 62
![Page 63: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
View Street
12a) In View Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 2 33% 0% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 8 25% 15 47% 6 19% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 6 15% 8 20% 18 44% 9 22% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 1 8% 0% 7 54% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 4 9% 6 14% 10 23% 23 53% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 1 3% 1 3% 20 63% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 19 9% 27 13% 102 47% 67 31% 215 100%
12b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 17 41% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 93 43% 4 2% 4 2% 2 1% 112 52% 215 100%
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
10pm
Page 22
Page 63
![Page 64: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
12c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 5 83% 0% 0% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 18 56% 1 3% 0% 13 41% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 24 59% 1 2% 5 12% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 12 28% 4 9% 1 2% 26 60% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 104 48% 10 5% 10 5% 91 42% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 23 72% 9 28% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 31 76% 9 22% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 18 42% 24 56% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 10 59% 7 41% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 4 80% 5 100%
Totals 8 4% 130 60% 77 36% 215 100%
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
12d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in View Street.
Page 23
Page 64
![Page 65: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Young Lane
13a) In Young Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 2 33% 0% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 5 16% 6 19% 14 44% 7 22% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 7 17% 4 10% 19 46% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 5 12% 5 12% 11 26% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 21 66% 7 22% 32 100%
Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 28 13% 21 10% 102 47% 64 30% 215 100%
13b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 19 46% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 19 46% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 16 37% 0% 0% 0% 27 63% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 92 43% 5 2% 4 2% 2 1% 112 52% 215 100%
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
10pm
Page 24
Page 65
![Page 66: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
13c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 15 47% 2 6% 3 9% 12 38% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 3 7% 15 37% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 0% 2 15% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 14 33% 4 9% 1 2% 24 56% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%
Anonymous 5 29% 4 24% 0% 8 47% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 95 44% 16 7% 14 7% 90 42% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 0% 5 83% 1 17% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 23 72% 9 28% 32 100%
Earle Street 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 29 71% 11 27% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 6 46% 4 31% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 20 47% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 9 4% 136 63% 70 33% 215 100%
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
13d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Young Lane.
Page 25
Page 66
![Page 67: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Young Street
14a) In Young Street on the western side, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 2 33% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 1 3% 15 47% 6 19% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 7 17% 6 15% 19 46% 9 22% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 2 15% 1 8% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 5 12% 5 12% 13 30% 20 47% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 6 19% 5 16% 21 66% 0% 32 100%
Anonymous 4 24% 1 6% 9 53% 3 18% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 100%
Totals 38 18% 21 10% 104 48% 52 24% 215 100%
14b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):
6pm
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 2 6% 0% 20 63% 32 100%
Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 21 51% 1 2% 3 7% 0% 16 39% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 5 38% 2 15% 0% 0% 6 46% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 17 40% 0% 0% 0% 26 60% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 18 56% 3 9% 2 6% 2 6% 7 22% 32 100%
Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 95 44% 7 3% 7 3% 2 1% 104 48% 215 100%
Residential Street Address
8pm Midnight No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Support changes
No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P
10pm
Page 26
Page 67
![Page 68: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
14c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 3 9% 8 25% 11 34% 32 100%
Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 5 12% 13 32% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%
Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 16 37% 4 9% 1 2% 22 51% 43 100%
Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 17 53% 2 6% 6 19% 7 22% 32 100%
Anonymous 5 29% 6 35% 0% 6 35% 17 100%
Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 93 43% 20 9% 21 10% 81 38% 215 100%
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%
Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%
Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%
Grasmere Lane 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%
Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%
Oaks Avenue 3 23% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%
Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%
Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%
Sutherland Street 1 2% 23 53% 19 44% 43 100%
Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%
Young Street 6 19% 23 72% 3 9% 32 100%
Anonymous 0% 13 76% 4 24% 17 100%
Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%
Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 100%
Totals 15 7% 144 67% 56 26% 215 100%
Totals
Residential Street Address
Yes No No Answer Totals
Residential Street Address
Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer
14d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Young Street.
Page 27
Page 68
![Page 69: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Zone_id Area_id HNO. Street Name Current Restrictions
Total
Spaces Occupancy
Recommended
Changes Comments
683 26 10 Belgrave Street
Clearway 3pm - 7pm
Mon - Fri Unrestricted
Parking other times 8 100% Retain existing
Overall, 47% of respondents support no changes in Belgrave Street.
11.2% support 2 Hour Parking and 9.8% support 4 Hour Parking.
Respondents in this section of Belgrave Street generally support no
changes.
668 26 36 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100%
2 Hour Parking
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Lane
(equally support 2 and 4 Hour Parking)
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support 2 Hour
parking.
669 26 32 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100% Retain existing
Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Lane
(equally support 2 and 4 Hour Parking)
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support
unrestricted parking.
670 26 26 Ben Boyd Lane
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 6 67% Retain existing
Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Lane
(equally support 2 and 4 Hour Parking)
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support 2 Hour
parking.
671 26 24 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100% Retain existing
Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Lane
(equally support 2 and 4 Hour Parking)
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support
unrestricted parking.
621
26
267 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking
16 81% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support
unrestricted parking.
622 26 243 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 2 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support parking
restrictions.
Parking Area 26 - Proposed Parking Restrictions
Page 1
Page 69
![Page 70: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
623 26 235 Ben Boyd Road
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 7 57% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support parking
restrictions.
624 26 216 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 11 100% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
34% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support 4 Hour parking.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support
unrestricted parking.
625 26 240 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 5 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 4 Hour
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
34% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support 4 Hour parking.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support 4 Hour
parking.
626 26 242 Ben Boyd Road
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 10 80%
Convert eight (8)
existing 2 Hour
parking spaces
along the
frontage of 45
Grasmere Road to
4 Hour Parking
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
34% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support 4 Hour parking.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support 4 Hour
parking.
624A 26 224 Ben Boyd Road
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 1 100% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road
(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)
43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.
34% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support 4 Hour parking.
Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support retaining
existing restriction.
Page 2
Page 70
![Page 71: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
631 26 1 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 19 63%
1. Convert three
(3) spaces of
unrestricted
parking fronting
No.1 and No.3
Earle Street to 4
Hour Parking
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions in Earle Street
(7% support 2 Hour Parking and 14% support 4 Hour Parking)
25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support unrestricted
parking.
632 26 33 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 14 57% Retain existing
Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions in Earle Street
(7% support 2 Hour Parking and 14% support 4 Hour Parking)
25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support retaining
existing restriction.
634 26 Earle Street Unrestricted 2 50% Retain existing
Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions, 50% support no
changes in Earle Street
25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction (8% support 2
Hour Parking, 17% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support no changes.
2483 26 2 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 22 77% Retain existing
Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions, 50% support no
changes in Earle Street
25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction (8% support 2
Hour Parking, 17% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support no changes.
2509 26 33 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 14 64% Retain existing
Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions, 50% support no
changes in Earle Street
25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction (8% support 2
Hour Parking, 17% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support no changes.
Page 3
Page 71
![Page 72: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
650 26 67 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 5 100% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
651 26 67 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 5 80% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
652 26 67 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 5 100% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
653 26 50 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 4 100% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
654 26 17 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 3 100% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
655 26 17 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 4 75% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
656 26 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 1 100% Retain existing
Overall, 24% of respondents support parking restrictions, 55% support no
changes in Grasmere Lane.
50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restrictions.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no
changes.
Page 4
Page 72
![Page 73: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
645 26 50 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 24 92%
Convert existing
four (4)
unrestricted
parking spaces
fronting No.38-40
Grasmere Road to
2 Hour Parking
8.30am - 6pm
Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted
Area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support no
changes.
647 26 26 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 27 89% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions.
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support no
changes.
648 26 3 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 19 89%
Convert parking
in front of No.39-
45 Grasmere
Road (approx. 9
spaces) to 4 Hour
Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri
Permit Holders
Excepted Area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions.
50% of respondents in this section of Grasmere Road support 4 Hour
Parking.
649 26 49 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 12 92%
Convert parking
in front of No. 49-
51A Grasmere
Road (approx. 3
spaces) to 4 Hour
Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri
Permit Holders
Excepted Area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions (27%
support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support parking
restrictions.
Page 5
Page 73
![Page 74: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
648A 26 Grasmere Road
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 20 50% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support parking
restrictions.
649A 26 61 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 1 0% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support no
changes.
649B 26 59 Grasmere Road
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 6 50%
Convert parking
in front of No. 49-
51A Grasmere
Road (approx. 3
spaces) to 4 Hour
Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri
Permit Holders
Excepted Area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions, 48% support no
changes in Grasmere Road.
49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions (27%
support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support parking
restrictions.
259 27 23 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 6 67% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
260 27 21 Oaks Avenue
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 9 56% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
261 27 7 Oaks Avenue
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 3 33% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
Page 6
Page 74
![Page 75: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
262 27 1A Oaks Avenue
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 8 25% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
627 27 20 Oaks Avenue
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 19 37% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
261A 27 9 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 6 50% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
627A 27 18 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 7 71% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
627B 27 22 Oaks Avenue
No Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri 2 0% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.
39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%
support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.
628 26 45 Park Avenue
4 Hour 8.30am -6Pm
Mon-Fri PH Excepted
area 26 10 50% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking and 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support no
changes.
629 26 49 Park Avenue
8 Hour 8.30am-6pm
Mon-Fri PH excepted
area 26 11 100%
Convert existing 8
Hour parking to 4
Hour 8.30am-
6pm Mon-Fri PH
excepted area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking and 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support 4 Hour
parking.
Page 7
Page 75
![Page 76: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
630 26 55 Park Avenue
8P 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri
PH excepted area 26 8 100%
Convert existing 8
Hour parking to 4
Hour 8.30am-
6pm Mon-Fri PH
excepted area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking and 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support 4 Hour
parking.
2294 26 41 Park Avenue
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri 9 44%
Convert four (4)
spaces of existing
2 Hour parking to
'No Parking
4:30–7:00pm, 2
Hour
8:30am–4:30pm
permit holders
excepted'
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue
and 40% support introduction of a 24m pick-up and drop-off zone fronting
Cammeray Oval.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking, 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support parking
restrictions except one resident opposes the part-time pick-up and drop-
off zone.
2295 26 49 Park Avenue
4 Hour 8.30am -6Pm
Mon-Fri PH Excepted
area 26 6 100% Retain existing
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue
and 40% support introduction of a 24m pick-up and drop-off zone
fronting Cammeray Oval.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking and 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support no
changes.
2296 26 57 Park Avenue
8 Hour 8.30am-6pm
Mon-Fri PH excepted
area 26 58 76%
Convert existing 8
Hour parking to 4
Hour 8.30am-
6pm Mon-Fri PH
excepted area 26
Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue.
50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%
support 2 Hour parking and 50% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support 4 Hour
parking.
672 26 20 Sutherland Lane
1 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 5 60%
Convert existing 1
Hour parking to 2
Hour 8.30am-
6pm Mon-Fri PH
excepted area 26
Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Lane.
50% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (50%
support 2 Hour parking and 0% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support parking
restrictions.
Page 8
Page 76
![Page 77: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
657 26 40 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 5 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 4 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support 4 Hour
parking restrictions.
658 26 38 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 20 85%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 4 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26 except
along the street
frontage of No.22
Sutherland Street
(approx. 8 spaces)
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions except respondents of No.22 Sutherland Street.
659 26 8 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 3 67% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support no
changes.
660 26 8 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 7 86%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 4 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
Page 9
Page 77
![Page 78: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
661 26 5 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 7 86% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support no
changes.
662 26 9 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 4 50%
Convert existing 2
Hour parking to 4
Hour 8.30am-
6pm Mon-Fri PH
excepted area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
663 26 21 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 11 91%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
664 26 31 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 3 100% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
665 26 31 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 5 80%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
Page 10
Page 78
![Page 79: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
666 26 48 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 9 67%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
673 26 54 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 4 75% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
674 26 55A Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 4 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
678 26 49 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 2 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
679 26 49 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 3 67% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
Page 11
Page 79
![Page 80: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
680 26 47 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 2 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
681 26 41 Sutherland Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 3 33% Retain existing
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
682 26 39 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 6 100%
Convert existing
unrestricted
parking to 2 Hour
8.30am-6pm Mon-
Fri PH excepted
area 26
Overall, 32% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland
Street.
53% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (23%
support 2 Hour parking and 30% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking
restrictions.
646 26 29 View Street Unrestricted Parking 8 100% Retain existing
Overall, 22% of respondents support parking restrictions in View Street
(9% support 2 Hour parking and 13% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support no
changes.
646A 26 31 View Street Unrestricted Parking 3 100% Retain existing
Overall, 22% of respondents support parking restrictions in View Street
(9% support 2 Hour parking and 13% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support no
changes.
675 26 31 Young Lane Unrestricted Parking 6 83% Retain existing
Overall, 23% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Lane
100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes.
Respondents in this section of Young Lane generally support no changes.
Page 12
Page 80
![Page 81: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
676 26 31 Young Lane Unrestricted Parking 4 100% Retain existing
Overall, 23% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Lane
100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes
Respondents in this section of Young Lane generally support no changes.
677 26 31 Young Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100% Retain existing
Overall, 23% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Lane
100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes.
Respondents in this section of Young Lane generally support no changes.
642 26 48 Young Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 8 63% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Street
35% of Young Street respondents support parking restrictions (19%
support 2 Hour parking and 16% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Young Street generally support no changes.
643 26 64 Young Street
2 Hour Parking 8am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 10 60% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Street
35% of Young Street respondents support parking restrictions (19%
support 2 Hour parking and 16% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Young Street generally support no changes.
644 26 82 Young Street
2 Hour Parking 8.30am -
6pm Mon - Fri Permit
Holders Excepted Area
26 9 67% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Street
35% of Young Street respondents support parking restrictions (19%
support 2 Hour parking and 16% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Young Street generally support no changes.
2510 26 112 Young Street Unrestricted Parking 26 46% Retain existing
Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Street
35% of Young Street respondents support parking restrictions (19%
support 2 Hour parking and 16% support 4 Hour parking)
Respondents in this section of Young Street generally support no changes.
Page 13
Page 81
![Page 82: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Item 4.4 - Traffic - 26/7/19 N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L
To the General Manager
Attach: 1. Survey Results 2. Proposed Parking Changes
3. Map - Proposed Changes SUBJECT: (4.4) North Sydney Parking Area 10 – Survey Results AUTHOR: Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER: A parking survey for a section of North Sydney Parking Area 10 was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 1201 residents, businesses, and to Edward Precinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 9%, which is slightly lower that the average response rate of 10 to 12%. The answers received from the residents for the North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the North Sydney Parking Area 10 are also detailed in the report. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for North Sydney Parking Area 10. 2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in North Sydney Parking Area 10. 3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation in North Sydney Parking Area 10.
Page 82
![Page 83: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(2) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Engagement Protocol Relates to ECM No: N/A Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy Signs & Lines Priority: 2 Precinct and Ward: Edward, Wollstonecraft Impact on Bicycles: Nil Impact on Pedestrians: Nil Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the report. DETAIL North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey affects Bay Road (between Edward Street and Harriott Street), Priory Road, Toongarah Road and McHatton Street. A total of 1201 surveys were distributed to residents, property owners, businesses, and to the Edward Precinct between 16 and 23 May 2019. The survey was also distributed to North Sydney Demonstration School and the businesses within the area. The survey was also available online. Residents were given until the 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received, including 52 hard copy responses and 56 online responses. This represents a response rate of 9%. This is slightly lower that the average response rate, usually 10 to 12% for parking surveys. Survey Results The answers received for North Sydney Parking Area 10 parking survey are summarised in Attachment 1. Precinct Comments At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Edward Precinct Comments Received Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have been grouped by emerging themes.
Page 83
![Page 84: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(3) Support Parking Restrictions • We live at the bottom of McHatton St and work from home, as a consequence we get
to see the constant overstay by parkers at the bottom of McHatton street, the top of the street is not so bad as the school parking times come in and everyone needs to move. However, we regularly see people park for the whole day and never move their cars even though it is a 2 hour limit or alternatively, swap their cars with their friends to game the system. These behaviours cause a ripple effect to the school parents at pick up time with some parents parking across driveways, in driveways or no stopping zones. We have regularly phoned into council to report cars parked illegally however the behavior continues. I firmly believe a one hour one or paid parking (I really don't mind) would limit people from overstaying the 2 hours and force them to move their cars thereby reducing the congestion in the street.
• I notice that the students come down from the ACU around mid to late morning in pairs and swap their cars between their spot and their friend’s spot thereby extending their parking time by another 2 hours. Meters may prevent this sort of behavior. The ACU is well served by public transport.
• Endless traffic in Priory Rd + Toongarah Rd looking for parking is unsettling and dangerous in such a small residential area. Many children and babies live in the area and are subject to the pollution from the endless cars. 1 hour parking means residents and visitors and tradies can access some parking. Parts of Bay Rd, a through road has only 1 hour but needs 2 hour parking to take some focus away from dead end streets.
• In BAY ROAD between Edward and Harriott Streets, 1. f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate Monday to Friday AND PUBLIC HOLIDAYS
• "This is a good initiative and appreciate the survey. I find Toongarah Rd impossible to park in after I leave and come back by 5pm. There are many ACU uni students + commuters that park in this street and leave aggressive rude notes on cars when they aren't able to squeeze in parking spots.
• I don't have a car but can't provide reliable parking for visitors + tradesmen. The volume of traffic is really high for a dead-end street (I think mostly students who just swap places every 2 hours). Meters would only hit those least able to pay. 1 hr parking would make all users look at the very good public transport alternatives.
• Less all day parking in Toongarah Road would go some way to creating more turnover for those seeking short term parking, particularly ACU students. Well marked designated bays as for meter parking would help overcome vehicles using excessive space and prevent the impeding of driveway access.
Oppose Meters • Absolutely NO parking meters • We strongly object to introducing more restrictive parking in McHatton St
particularly meter parking. This is a quiet residential area with visiting family and friends who would have to pay for parking, as would some family members. It represents encroachment of North Sydney CBD on a residential street.
Page 84
![Page 85: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(4) • Please, NO parking meters! What about installing circular timers set in the road (as
in the Council's car park) for Edward St?.
• Very concerned that any change will affect our amenity as residents. Visitors and trades people need up to 2hrs free parking Mon to Fri and unlimited Sat -Sun. Further restrictions especially charging them if meters are installed will be a negative for these occasional parkers. And ultimately a negative for our enjoyment of our home and surrounds.
• Metered parking should be avoided - there is no reason for it in a residential area. Resident complaints about student parking is relevant.
• I feel like more parking permits should be issued to residents. I currently have none because I have 1 garage space but 2 bedrooms. The current times are fine and space frees up after 6pm anyway. I don’t want my visitors to start having to pay for parking and have ugly pay stations on the streets.
• We would like to strongly object to any proposal to change current parking restrictions in McHatton St or surrounding streets ie Crows Nest Road or Bay Road. Given that that houses in McHatton St are large family houses, we all have teenage children and extended family, grandparents and cousins who visit frequently. Even if immediate family members living in the house have residential stickers (which we have to pay for) any visitors to the house including guests, extended family and trades people would be forced to pay for parking. We bought these homes as we wanted to live in quiet residential area. The Councils proposed changes represent a creeping incursion of North Sydney CBD into a residential area with significant on flowing impact to residents and their extended family. Please confirm you have no plans to change parking or introduce meters in these streets.
• I don’t see introducing more paid parking is a equitable way to manage the parking demand to benefit local residents and their visitors if the council is not to waive resident parking permit cost, rather this is a revenue generating approach by the council. Council shall share the statistics on the number of complaints received to public to be more transparent on the decision process of a change. The wording “it is Councils understanding “doesn’t cut it.
• 1. I have not made comments above as I have no difficulties with parking in North Sydney. 2. May apartment has a lock-up garage and some space for visitors. More visitor space would be good but I'm not willing to pay for it. 3. Those meters are very expensive!!
• We recently purchased a house in Toongarah, a major reason for this purchase was the parking conditions. It is easy to get a car park on weekends and we understood the parking conditions on weekdays - no need for change at all
• I fully support the current parking arrangements. I do not see a need for any changes. I am always able to park close to my home.
Page 85
![Page 86: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(5)
• Parking restrictions in these proposed streets should be left at or all changed to 2 hourparking only. This would still ensure vehicle turnover as 2 hours is not that long topark and commuters wouldn't be able to park there all day as NSC ensures thatparking rangers are onsite pretty much most days of the week anyway! Meteredparking is only put in place to raise more funds for the Council and it has very littleimpact on helping residents find parking... the cash raised through fines and meteredparking is then used for useless upgrades such as the unnecessary and expensivereplacement of foothpaths/ gutters on Bay Road and Mount Street as well as leavinggifts and conference expenses for NSC staff which is paid out of our (the residents)Council rates etc....
• We feel that there are already too many restrictions and that the parking should not be restricted further in North Sydney.
• My biggest concern is parking meters. Why there is a need to make these areas "resident exempt" I do not know. These are residential areas, and should be there for residents. This is where we live. This is where we pay rates. In my view, parking meters should not be introduced into residential areas. Parking meters are symbolic of the CBD. I strong oppose introducing aspects of the CBD into residential streets. We should be doing all we can to retain the suburban-ness we are so lucky to have. North Sydney Council have very strong heritage and conservation laws, which I support wholeheartedly. To allow any form of "CBD creep" into these areas would be disastrous in my view. In your letter it is said that the introduction of meters into Edward Street has been a success. But I'd say it's the fact that it is "combined with enforcement" that is the clincher. I'd get rid of meters in Edward St, introduce "2 hour" parking signs with an addition saying "WARNING - REGULARLY ENFORCED".
• Please leave some all day parking in Toongarah Road. No not make the street all restricted parking. Thank you – John.
• The proposed parking changes are another example of Council increasing fees and charges with no increase in services.
Enforcement
• The current parking restrictions work reasonably well and therefore I supportretaining them with the exception of areas close to Pacific Highway and the CBDsuch as Doohat Ave and Lane. The problem with imposing greater parkingrestrictions in the areas identified in the survey is that it will just push the parkingproblem into other streets in Waverton. The area around the school is particularly badaround drop-off and pick-up times, however I think the current restrictions are asgood as can be, especially when accompanied by visible and consistent enforcement.
• As we have found out in the past if there is not sufficient monitoring restrictions arefruitless.
• Increase number of parking inspectors. Fine people for inconsiderate parking (suchas leaving 9/10 of a parking space between their car and the legal parking boundaryand parking across two parking spaces).
Page 86
![Page 87: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(6) Parking Difficulties • The parking is already very limited for residents in the area, particular for the people
that are living in new buildings and are not eligible for residents parking permits. Changes to the restrictions would mean we would consider moving out.
• Please don't change the parking restrictions - we are in a 2 bedroom house with 3 of us
living there (2 of us are the owners) and we all have a car, only 1 car fits in the garage, the other 2 don't, and we are NOT allowed to get parking permits - we haven't been approved!! AND we get public transport to work - where are we meant to park our cars Monday to Friday???!!.
• For market days and events at the stadium, parking on Bay Road and McHatton St is
full with cars. • Apart from the problem of parking, the continual flow of traffic with people (mainly
students from A.C.U), who are looking for somewhere to park creates a real safety problem, especially when the school children are walking home.
• For those who are not eligible for a parking permit, these are the only options to park
anywhere near North Sydney. If trying to prevent commuters, I would propose shifting the start time of the metering to earlier. Our Apartment has an allocated spot in our building, but the owner has sub-leased it separately, so we are not eligible for a parking permit. We already have to park down the hill as there is no suitable parking nearby, changing this will simply force us to park the car down in Waverton or Willoughby.
• I live in a small two bedroom apartment with a garage on title meaning I can’t apply for
a parking permit. The problem is my garage is so small I can’t fit my car in and therefore have to park on the street. I feel there needs to be more permits issued for residents of the area. Plus a reduction in the timing of allowed parking times meaning more turnover from ACU students and commuters parking in my street.
• As a personal opinion. After 6-7pm Monday to Friday, finding parking spots is
relatively easy. But definitely, it is quite difficult during business hours. As a resident in Priory Rd, I find notes on my vehicle windscreen (left by neighbours and visitors) in which all they complain for either parking to close to the home driveways or for not parking as close as possible to others cars and driveways ("park considerably" as they mention on the notes). Delimiting the parking spots is also important in this process you are carrying out, mainly if metered parking won't be applied as it suggests, there would not be any parking boundaries for each car. Many thanks.
• I personally am of the view that parking restrictions should not be extended beyond 6pm
Monday to Friday. As a North Sydney Council resident, I have found it difficult to head to Coles to buy a few household groceries without having to incur fees to park my vehicle nearby. This discourages me from doing my local shopping in the area but drive up to Woolworths instead. Perhaps an end to restrictions outside business hours would bring about greater convenience for local residents.
Page 87
![Page 88: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(7)
Other
• In some areas, specific motor bike parking would be good.
• Can safety of the Priory Rd and Bay Rd intersection be addressed as part of these works?This intersection for cars turning right existing Priory Rd has poor sighting to left (sharp bend in Rd) and right (poor line of sight due to parked cars) along Bay Road. Possibly by reducing a number of the end car spaces along Bay Rd prior to the intersection to improve line of sight for right hand turning cars from Priory Rd? Cars tend to travel fast along Bay after the pedestrian crossing road and this combined with poor line of sight make this a difficult intersection to traverse. Speed bumps may also assist to slow cars down in both directions along Bay Rd.
• Parking permit are being given to residents who already have garages but choose to use the garage for another purpose e.g. another room thus taking up more street parking spaces.
• Note: Please make Doohat Lane a permanent NO PARKING AREA. 24/7. It is a very narrow laneway and often vehicles have trouble entering and exiting the street when there is a parked car. Only one way in and our 24 hours. All residents have to use the laneway. Trucks blow out exhaust fumes when they have to carefully navigate through the narrow laneway. Our only access into our garage is through Doohat Lane on the northern side. The laneway is used 24/7 and often trucks and some cars have difficulty entering/ exiting when there are cards parked in the laneway. Please make it a NO PARKING ZONE.
• The increased demand for parking came with the high-density development on the Pacific Highway. SO it is a problem directly related to approvals for development made by North Sydney Council. The burden or metered parking affects all residents and business and is a poor solution to a problem of the Council and possibly state directives.
• Toongarah Rd: We strongly suggest that to make more parking spaces available using existing parking restrictions that Council mark with white lines the exact parking spaces. This will by my count add at least 20% more spaces. Regularly cars take two spaces & cars parked at low demand times park so that peak demand spaces are very inefficient. I have answered NO to all other streets. I have no basis on which to comment on other residents' needs & concerns & would argue other residents from streets other than Toongarah & Priory Rd residents should refrain from offering comments on Toongarah Rd & Priory Rd residents' needs and concerns.
• 5 mins is not enough to go into school grounds, find your child and return to the car.
• Happy with the current way parking is handled.
• Please do not change any parking rules around North Sydney Dem school.
• I wanted to say do not change, but the choice wasn’t there.
Page 88
![Page 89: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(8)
• Parking payment exemption for localsa. I live, shop go to the post office and have a variety of chores to attend to in my local
area. I can not go anywhere without paying for parking - at times when I move my car due to location on a few occasions in one day I can spend nearly $20 on parking.
b. I would love to see a local exemption offered to people who live in the area similar to those provided by the northern beaches and Mosman councils.
c. It is very expensive to live in an area where nearly all the streets accessible to conduct day to day business are metered. This is very unfair when you live in the area. For example, there are many places you can park in Mosman or the northern beaches that are not metered yet close to shops etc. In North Sydney there are none.
• Taxisa. I know this is a bone of contention that the council is aware of but want to bring it
to your attention again. The taxis take up a lot of parking spaces just sitting waiting for a fare. In fact they often sit on the clearway (during clearway hours) on the Pacific Hwy, outside the post office, on Miller St etc. I have often been blocked by them and restricted from getting a parking space due to a row of taxis. Of course, I understand that they are a service we all need however they are a pest.
• We don't oppose paid parking, but note the initial installation costs, over simpler changes to signage to restrict parking. Marking and numbering of spaces for parking meters could result in the loss of four or five spaces between driveways in Priory & Toongarah Roads, depending on current regulations. Several spaces can currently be occupied by two considerate drivers, without infringing on driveways.
• In the event of parking changes in Priory road I would like council to consider options /opportunities for motorbike parking.
• I am not in favour of the changes proposed. Why am I being penalised for my choice to own a car and live in this area? I think the limited all-day parking spots are essential for those of us whose household need more than one car. Please do not decrease the number of all-day parks > instead work to discourage non-locals from parking in the area by limiting/ reducing the time restrictions.
• Paid parking is just revenue raising. Council must ensure all developments/redevelopments including schools contain off street parking which is sufficient for number of residents/ visitors. Schools must provide own parking and not just allow the problem to impact neighbours.
• Overall, in my opinion, Area 10 is residential parking. Not commuter parking. It is a shame that we have been provided with an Area 10 parking map only, when streets just outside this area affect Area 10 residents. For instance, I live on McHatton St. When trades people need to park their vehicle in my property, I need to park my car somewhere else. My options are to park in the 2 hours parking nearby, and check the car every 2 hours, or move it every 2 hours. Or park just around the corner in Morton Street, which has all day parking. The problem is that Morton St is taken my commuters, who leave their car all day and either walk to North Sydney CBD, or walk to Waverton Station, to commute into the city. This has a negative impact on residents in the area. We do not need commuter parking at all. 2 hour parking could fix this, with larger areas for resident parking. Perhaps residents of North Sydney could be issued with say, five 1 day "resident area" parking windscreen stickers. If there was an area on the sticker where the date could be written in ink, each sticker could be used only once. Residents could
Page 89
![Page 90: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results
(9)
then park anywhere in North Sydney area "residents parking". So when that emergency arose and a resident needed to find an "immediate emergency" parking space to allow a trades person to use their driveway, it doesn't become a problem. At the end of last year I had my driveway replaced, and some retaining walls built. SO I was without a driveway. I paid for a council permit, I think it was 3 months at a time for residents All parking taken. We need parking permits that apply in a larger area, which is why I have suggested the "North Sydney" area. Just a suggestion.
• 1.Who has complained about difficulties in parking and what discussion has been arranged to discuss the situation. It seems to me that there is no unresolvable problem. How many car spaces are “leased “to car renters and why can’t they provide other free parking at their expense. 2. Has council insisted on free parking in the new buildings being built in North Sydney CBD or setting up parking places to satisfy these developments all of which has an effect on local parking. 3. Has council considered other ways to allow more parking in the North Sydney area, including angled parking including reduction in the size of footpaths levelling Edward Street insistence that the schools provide pick up and drop off areas (within their own land) and insistence that buildings provide sufficient parking for ALL their visitors. 4. I am concerned that you and your associates are not looking at ways to resolve the problem but rather to provide new ways to fine us all. have you looked at angle parking in many streets this could be done. 5. I do not believe that meter parking will do other than make North Sydney less attractive to businesses.
• My biggest concern is there is no drop off zone for school students in Bay Road (btw
Edward and Pacific Hwy Northern zone). There is 15 minute parking, but this seems to get congested and of no benefit to drop offs. The pedestrian crossing in Bay Road has only been attended twice this week by the ‘lolly pop’ lady – I prefer to drop by young child on Bay Road, so he doesn’t need to cross the crossing (which may or may not be attended). Could we have two-three spaces for drop off just past the bus zone to avoid some school child accident.
Discussion The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in Bay Road, Priory Road, Toongarah Road, McHatton Street and Doohat Lane. Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Attachment 2. Overall, there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 10 and as such no additional parking meters have been recommended in Area 10.
Page 90
![Page 91: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 1
(note: school pick-up and drop off times within this street are not included in this survey
Q.1.b.
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Bay Road 13 48% 3 11% 9 33% 2 7% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 1 13% 3 38% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 10 67% 0% 3 20% 2 13% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 4 22% 2 11% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 5 38% 2 15% 5 38% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 1 33% 1 33% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 52 48% 12 11% 31 29% 13 12% 108 100%
Q.1.c.
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Bay Road 13 48% 11 41% 2 7% 1 4% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 1 13% 2 25% 2 25% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 4 22% 2 11% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 53 49% 31 29% 12 11% 12 11% 108 100%
1 Hour Meter Parking
8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri
2 Hour Parking
8.30am - 6pm Mon - FriNo answer Total
1. Survey Results - BAY ROAD between Edward and Harriott Streets,
On the northern side of Bay Road, I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm &
3.30pm - 6pm Mon – Fri” with (tick one):
Resident Street Address
Resident Street Address
Bay Road
Retain existing
1 Hour Parking
9.30am - 2.30pm &
3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri
2 Hour Meter Parking
9.30am - 2.30pm &
3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri
No answer Total
Retain existing
On the southern side of Bay Rd, I am in favour of replacing the existing “1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri” with (tick
one):
Page 91
![Page 92: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 2
Q.1.d. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Bay Road 14 52% 12 44% 0% 1 4% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 1 13% 2 25% 1 13% 4 50% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 10 67% 1 7% 1 7% 3 20% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 1 6% 4 22% 3 17% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 3 23% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 54 50% 24 22% 13 12% 17 16% 108 100%
Q.1.e. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Bay Road 25 93% 1 4% 0% 0% 1 4% 27 0
Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0
McHatton Street 3 38% 1 13% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 0
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 0
Priory Road 14 78% 1 6% 0% 1 6% 2 11% 18 0
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
Toongarah Road 9 69% 2 15% 0% 1 8% 1 8% 13 0
Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 0
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 0
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
Grand Total 86 80% 7 6% 1 1% 2 2% 12 11% 108 100%
1 Hour Parking 2 Hour Meter Parking No answer TotalResident Street Address
Retain existing 6pm 10pm Midnight No answerResident Street Address
Total
Retain existing
Page 92
![Page 93: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 3
Q.1.f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Bay Road 13 48% 12 44% 1 4% 0% 1 4% 27 0
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Carr Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 0
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0
Harriott Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0
McHatton Street 1 13% 3 38% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 0
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Pacific Highway 10 67% 3 20% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 0
Priory Road 10 56% 4 22% 0% 2 11% 2 11% 18 0
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 13 0
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 0
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 0
Toongarah Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0
Grand Total 52 48% 36 33% 4 4% 4 4% 12 11% 108 100%
TotalResident Street Address
Retain existing Monday to Friday ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer
Page 93
![Page 94: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 4
Q.2.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Priory Road 6 33% 7 39% 5 28% 0% 18 17%
Bay Road 15 56% 8 30% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 2 25% 2 25% 0% 4 50% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 11 73% 0% 2 13% 2 13% 15 14%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 4 31% 0% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Priory Road 0% 0% 2 67% 1 33% 3 3%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 57 53% 22 20% 17 16% 12 11% 108 100%
Q.2.c. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Priory Road 16 89% 0% 0% 2 11% 0% 18 17%
Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 3 38% 1 13% 0% 0% 4 50% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 12 92% 1 8% 0% 0% 0% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Priory Road 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 0% 3 3%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 90 83% 4 4% 1 1% 2 2% 11 10% 108 100%
2. Survey Results - PRIORY ROAD,
Retain existing 1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer Total
Priory Road
Resident Street Address
Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer Total
Page 94
![Page 95: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 5
Q.2.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Priory Road 6 33% 9 50% 0% 3 17% 0% 18 17%
Bay Road 15 56% 8 30% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 2 25% 1 13% 1 13% 0% 4 50% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 11 73% 2 13% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Priory Road 0% 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 3 3%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 57 53% 32 30% 4 4% 4 4% 11 10% 108 100%
TotalResident Street Address
Retain existingMonday to Friday
ONLYMonday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer
Page 95
![Page 96: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 6
Q.3.b.
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Toongarah Road 5 38% 3 23% 5 38% 0% 13 12%
Bay Road 17 63% 6 22% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 12 80% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 15 14%
Priory Road 5 28% 9 50% 3 17% 1 6% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Waverton Avenue 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 63 58% 19 18% 12 11% 14 13% 108 100%
Q.3.c. The current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Toongarah Road 12 92% 1 8% 0% 0% 13 12%
Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%
Priory Road 16 89% 0% 1 6% 1 6% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 92 85% 2 2% 1 1% 13 12% 108 100%
1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer Total
3. Survey Results - TOONGARAH ROAD,
I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):
Toongarah Road
Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm Midnight No answer Total
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
Page 96
![Page 97: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 7
Q.3.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 13 12%
Bay Road 16 59% 7 26% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 12 80% 1 7% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%
Priory Road 5 28% 10 56% 0% 2 11% 1 6% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Waverton Avenue 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 61 56% 29 27% 2 2% 3 3% 13 12% 108 100%
TotalResident Street Address
Retain existingMonday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer
Page 97
![Page 98: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 8
Q.4.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
McHatton Street 4 50% 3 38% 0% 1 13% 8 7%
Bay Road 19 70% 4 15% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 12 80% 0% 2 13% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 9 50% 2 11% 5 28% 2 11% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 7 54% 1 8% 4 31% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 67 62% 16 15% 13 12% 12 11% 108 100%
Q.4.c. The current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
McHatton Street 6 75% 0% 0% 1 13% 1 13% 8 7%
Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 14 93% 0% 0% 0% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 15 83% 0% 0% 1 6% 2 11% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 10 77% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 93 86% 1 1% 1 1% 2 2% 11 10% 108 100%
4. Survey Results - McHATTON STREET,
Retain existing 1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer Total
McHatton Street
Resident Street Address
TotalResident Street Address
Retain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer
Page 98
![Page 99: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 9
Q.4.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
McHatton Street 3 38% 3 38% 0% 1 13% 1 13% 8 7%
Bay Road 19 70% 3 11% 2 7% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 12 80% 2 13% 0% 0% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 9 50% 5 28% 0% 2 11% 2 11% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 7 54% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 65 60% 23 21% 4 4% 5 5% 11 10% 108 100%
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
Monday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer Total
Page 99
![Page 100: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 10
Q.5.b. I am in favour of replacing existing “1/2 Hour Meter Parking” in Doohat Avenue with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Doohat Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Bay Road 18 67% 5 19% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 9 60% 2 13% 3 20% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 3 17% 2 11% 3 17% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 62 57% 17 16% 14 13% 15 14% 108 100%
Q.5.c. I am in favour of replacing existing unrestricted parking in Doohat Lane with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Doohat Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Bay Road 18 67% 3 11% 3 11% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 10 67% 3 20% 1 7% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 3 17% 3 17% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 63 58% 14 13% 15 14% 16 15% 108 100%
5. Survey Results - DOOHAT AVENUE and DOOHAT LANE,
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
1 Hour Meter
Parking
2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer
Doohat Avenue & Doohat Lane
1/2 Hour Parking 1 Hour Parking No answer Total
Total
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
Page 100
![Page 101: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Area 10 – Survey Results
Page | 11
Q.5.d. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 1 7% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 14 78% 0% 0% 1 6% 3 17% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 11 85% 1 8% 0% 0% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 88 81% 2 2% 1 1% 3 3% 14 13% 108 100%
Q.5.e. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%
Bay Road 18 67% 5 19% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%
Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Carr Street 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%
Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 7%
Mount Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Pacific Highway 9 60% 3 20% 0% 2 13% 1 7% 15 14%
Priory Road 10 56% 3 17% 0% 2 11% 3 17% 18 17%
Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%
Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%
Non-resident owner
Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%
Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
School community
Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%
Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%
Business Owner
Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%
Grand Total 62 57% 20 19% 3 3% 7 6% 16 15% 108 100%
Total
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
Monday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer Total
Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer
Page 101
![Page 102: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
Bay Road 84% Existing Hours
26 Bay Road 24-46 94% 92 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 34% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 80% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Bay Road support parking restrictions.
26A Bay Road 22 100% 1 1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 48% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 40% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 44% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (11% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Bay Road support parking restrictions.
32 Bay Road School 29% 7
1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri
1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
1/4P pickup and drop off times not included in this survey
Overall 49% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 40% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 48% retain exisiting and 48% requested changes (7% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Bay Road support parking restrictions.
33 Bay Road 11 100% 2
1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
1/4P pickup and drop off times not included in this survey
Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 32% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation.
34 Bay Road 15-17 100% 42 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 34% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 80% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 1 of 7
Page 102
![Page 103: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
62 Bay Road 23-29A 80% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 34% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 80% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation.
85 Bay Road 52-66 83% 92 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 34% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 80% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation.
Priory Road 95%
18 Priory Road `4-8 100% 122 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 53% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 36% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support metered parking). 83% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation.
20 Priory Road `1 - 15 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 53% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 36% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support metered parking). 83% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Priory Road support parking restrictions.
23 Priory Road 2 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 53% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 36% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support metered parking). 83% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 2 of 7
Page 103
![Page 104: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
24 Priory Road 1 100% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 53% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 36% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support metered parking). 83% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Priory Road support parking restrictions.
Toongarah Road 96%
1 Toongarah Road 9 100% 2 Unrestricted Parking Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 85% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation.
17 Toongarah Road 2A - 9 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 85% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation.
21 Toongarah Road `8 - 22 100% 19 Unrestricted ParkingConvert 10 spaces to 2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 85% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Toongarah Road support parking restrictions.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 3 of 7
Page 104
![Page 105: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
22 Toongarah Road 24 100% 12 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 85% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation.
113 Toongarah Road `1 - 9 88% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 85% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation.
McHatton Street 46%
36 McHatton Street 136 0% 72 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 5 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm School Days
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
36A McHatton Street School 0% 82 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri; No Parking 8:30-9:30am, 2:30-3:30pm Mon-Fri School Days
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 4 of 7
Page 105
![Page 106: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
36B McHatton Street School 55% 112 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 5 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm School Days
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
37 McHatton Street School 10% 5
2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
37A McHatton Street School 0% 12 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 2 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
38 McHatton Street School 71% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of McHatton Street support parking restrictions.
38A McHatton Street School 100% 2 Unrestricted Parking2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of McHatton Street support parking restrictions.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 5 of 7
Page 106
![Page 107: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
39 McHatton Street 41 50% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
40 McHatton Street 2 92% 62 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
41 McHatton Street `2 - 6 86% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 62% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 86% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.
Doohat Avenue 49%
10 Doohat Avenue 136 50% 71/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 57% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support 1P metered and 13% 2P metered parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% and operation.
10B Doohat Avenue School 38% 71/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 57% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support 1P metered and 13% 2P metered parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 6 of 7
Page 107
![Page 108: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average
OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
11 Doohat Avenue School 60% 51/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10
Retain
Overall 57% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support 1P metered and 13% 2P metered parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% and operation.
Doohat Lane 100%
11B Doohat Lane 150 100% 2Unrestricted (rear of 150 Pacific Highway new development )
1/2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (13% support 1/2P and 14% 1P parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.
Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.Pacific Highway residents - 67% retain exisiting and 27% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.
Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 7 of 7
Page 108
![Page 109: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Area 12Area 10
North Sydney CouncilCopyright:
Copyright © North Sydney Council - No part of this map may be reproducedwithout permission. Commercial decisions should not be made based on information contained in this map without first checking details held by the responsible Government authority.
Further details can be obtained by calling (02) 9936 8100 or e-mail [email protected].
Area 10
Area 9
11
9
1
102
100
21
14
7
12
5
10
3
8
2A
104
13
4
15
108110
8991
2
6106
7
85
4
83
810
3-5
12
21
14
19
40
9 11
15
21-27
13
(38A-38D)
17
7
45
19
43
21
36
9
8
35
1519
10
64
2
1
8-20
31-37
1311
739-41
9
15
17
12
2927
2523
3
1
6
5
267-17
75
21
31
23
16
5
3
68
1
58
1
18
52
21
1
50
7
34
56
41A
70
20
54
1A
39A
3
32
3537
23
62
41
64
66
39
25
27
27A
29
29A
36
43
2
9
22
48
19
38
45
24
4
26
2
17
40
47
5
2A
6
46
8A
15
156-158
170
2B
160
1
40-42
11
211
5452
3
8
9
50
9
5A
4
17
6
7
25-29
174-180
5
53
3828
11
49-51
64
8B
44
20
2-4
15
12
(1A)
6
4846
55
42
31
56
58
17
3
12-14
16
18
8
2224
26
57
57
1010A
1
59
6163
65
67
1111
A
15
150
172
166
33
245
168
225
53
182
1
8
1012
1412
16 108
253
255-259
261
10
18 6
188
10A
(32)
6
30 2
265 8A
28
267
22
26
8
49
65
52
61
55
271
48
50
12
57
53
44
69
46
42
67
63
59
51
5454A
8
56
295
281
273
7-9
58
60
3
190
71
RILEY STREET
ROAD CLOSURE
TOONGARAH
ROAD ROAD
RESERVE
BANK
RESERVE
DON BANK
MUSEUM GARDENS
BROW
NS LA
NE
ROA
D RESERV
E
WAVERTON AVENUE
BANK STREET
RILEY STRE ET
EDWARD STREET
TOONG
ARAH ROAD
ANCRUM STRE ET
NAPIER STREET
OAK STREETCHARLES STREET
OAK LANE
WH
EELE
R
LANE
MCLAREN STREET
MO
RTON STREET
HAZELBANK ROAD
WAVERTO
N LANE
BERRY STREET
PRIO
RY ROAD
BAY ROAD
DOO
HAT LANE
DOOHAT AVENUE
MCHATTON STREET
BROWNS LANE WEST
PACIFIC HIGHW
AY
CROWS NEST ROAD
BROW
NS LANE
CHURCH STREET
CHURCH LANE
ANGELO
STREET
WES
T ST
REET
44
69
13MB
30
12
13MB
88
168A
89MB
70
167
27A
107
103
89A
89A
91MB
16
168
171
71
618
26A
42
36A
34
33
7
32
26
23
43
557
15A17
18
22
13
15
558
89MB
554A
37
1
113
37A
36
21
85
555
41
1314
14MZ
16
16CS
36B
62
38A
38
619D
554
39
24CS
20
73
74
24
554B
13MB
89
13
27
40
13
88MB
31
1802
86
11CS
87MB
10
4
88MB
11
10MB
5
88
11CS
87
10B
87MB
87
1913A
6
87MB
6MB
9
87
6
88MB
8DP
8
28
90
1911
91
1900
92
1900A
1900B
1802A
18991898
19121855
1800
1857
1801
1799A
2
11B
619C
1802
1799
6201858
36A40
41
36B
39
3838A
3737A
36
62
85
26A26
323334
24CS
23 24
17
21
113
1
22 2018
11B
11
10
9
10MB10B11CS11CS
Page 109
![Page 110: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Item 4.5 - Traffic - 26/7/2019
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L
To the General Manager
Attach: 1. Survey Results
2. Proposed Parking Changes
3. Map - Proposed Changes
SUBJECT: (4.5) North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results
AUTHOR: Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
A parking survey for a section of Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 was sent out on
the 16 May 2019 to 293 residents, businesses, and to Hayberry Precinct. Residents were given
until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40 responses were received. This represents a
response rate of 13.7%, which is within the average response rate of 10 to 12%.
The answers received from the residents for the Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21
survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the
Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 are also detailed in the report.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for North Sydney
Parking Area 21.
2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in North
Sydney Parking Area 21.
3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation
in North Sydney Parking Area 21.
Page 110
![Page 111: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart
Re: North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results
(2)
CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS
Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Engagement
Protocol
Relates to ECM No: N/A
Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy
Signs & Lines Priority: 2
Precinct and Ward: Hayberry, Wollstonecraft
Impact on Bicycles: Nil
Impact on Pedestrians: Nil
Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the
report.
DETAIL
North Sydney Parking Area 21 survey affects Carlow Street, Tucker Street, Cassins Street and
Cassins Lane.
A total of 293 surveys were distributed to residents, property owners, businesses, and to the
Hayberry Precinct between 16 and 23 May 2019. The survey was also distributed to North
Sydney Boys High School, Marist College North Shore, St Mary’s Catholic Primary School,
and the businesses within the North Sydney Oval building. The survey was also available
online. Residents were given until the 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40 responses were
received, including 19 hard copy responses and 21 online responses. This represents a response
rate of 13.8%. The average response rate is usually 10 to 12% for parking surveys.
Survey Results
The answers received for North Sydney Parking Area 21 parking survey are summarised in
Attachment 1.
Precinct Comments
At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Hayberry Precinct.
Comments Received
Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have
been grouped by emerging themes.
Page 111
![Page 112: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart
Re: North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results
(3)
Oppose Meters
• Current parking restrictions are fine as long as they are monitored and enforced. There
is no need for reduced parking times in this area. There is certainly NO need for metered
parking. Come on N/S Council, you are increasing rates, there is no need to collect
further money from my visitors.
• We are not in favour of the changes suggested and are particularly opposed to parking
meters in residential streets.
• I would hate to have parking meters outside my house. This would mean that all of my
visitors would have to pay! There is no benefit to me to have parking meters. It will be
a significant drawback. IF you do go ahead, then I will have to insist that I get about 50
free passes or else I will be worse off as I will probably end up paying for my visitor's
meter as I will feel guilty if they pay. Businesses like the cafes will suffer. I will make
Sotto and Eighty 88 on West Street aware of this. The only advantage is that you will
get more money. Cars will still park there. It will just make you richer and others poorer.
Leave it as it is please! It's fine as it is as commuters can't park there anyway as it is 2
hour parking! Please keep me updated.
• Please NO parking meters. Happy to have times reduced. Evening/ night parking not
hard in Carlow Street and Cassins Avenue.
• PLEASE NO PARKING METERS. We are a resident area we do not need meters. I
have lived in my house for over 50 years. I get resident parking tickets and always had
no worries. People who buy houses without parking have to realise they can't just park
out the front of their house. Please just leave it the way it is. It is a beautiful area to live
in.
• We are definitely against the introduction of parking meters and associated road
markings - this is a residential area not a business district. Our rates have been increased
greatly and now you are suggesting we pay for our family and friends to visit - while
you spend more money on potentially changing signs, introducing meters etc that are of
no benefit to us.
• No parking meters please.
• a) Only change parking of current unrestricted zones is wanted, to free up more parking
spaces. A minimum of 4 hours parking time must be specified.
b) No change to be made to existing timed street parking zones.
c) Residents I have spoken to do not agree with any meter parking. NOTE: Changing
unrestricted zones to 4hr will free up more street parking and prevent extended parking
by commuters and commercial operators (some cards were parked for 2 months and
police or Council could not remove them!).
• 1) I am not in favour of metered parking.
2) By placing a restriction on the unrestricted zones, it will turn these spots over. A car
repair business in West St uses these car spaces for weeks at a time. By restricting
these to 4 hours Mon-Fri, it will change significantly.
3) Residents should be able to have visitors park in the street at the weekend without
ridiculous constraints NO meter parking installed in any of these streets.
Page 112
![Page 113: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart
Re: North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results
(4)
Other
• Current restrictions are working well and balances the needs of residents and visitors.
• I will only support changes to parking that do not reduce the current number of
unrestricted parking spaces. Without this (as a resident) it would be prohibitively
difficult to park.
• I suggest that residents be entitled to a number of free parking vouchers per year (which
can be used by visitors) (This survey is structured in a way that doesn't allow for all
options, so I have ticked the boxes which were most relevant to myself as a resident.
Thank you!).
• Loading Dock is so annoying. Specially with all the trucks and vans coming and going
with lots of noises.
Discussion
The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in Carlow
Street. Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Attachment 2.
Overall, there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 21 and as such no additional
parking meters have been recommended in Area 21.
Page 113
![Page 114: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 1
(Note: the 10min parking restriction within this street is not included in this survey)
Q.1.b. I am in favour of replacing the existing parking restrictions including unrestricted zones in Carlow Street with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 6 40% 0% 1 7% 3 20% 3 20% 2 13% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 2 40% 1 20% 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 23 58% 1 3% 3 8% 3 8% 7 18% 3 8% 40 100%
Q.1.c. Between Monday and Friday, the current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm or 9:00pm. I would like them both to be changed to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 0% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 2 40% 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 31 78% 4 10% 2 5% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%
No answer Total
1 Hour Meter
ParkingTotalNo answerRetain existing 2 Hour Parking
2 Hour Meter
Parking1 Hour Parking
Resident Street Address
Resident Street Address
1. Survey Results - CARLOW STREET
Carlow Street
Retain existing 10pm8pm6pm
Page 114
![Page 115: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 2
Q.1.d. On Saturday, the current parking restrictions expires at 9:00pm or 11:00pm. I would like them both to be changed to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% 0% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 30 75% 5 13% 1 3% 2 5% 1 3% 1 3% 40 100%
Q.1.e. On Sunday, the current parking restriction that expires at 9:00pm. I would like this to be modified to (please tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 0% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 31 78% 4 10% 2 5% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%
Resident Street AddressRetain existing No answer Total6pm 8pm 10pm
6pm 8pm 10pmRetain existing No answer Total
Midnight
Resident Street Address
Page 115
![Page 116: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 3
Q.1.f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 6 40% 3 20% 2 13% 4 27% 0% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 2 40% 2 40% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 23 58% 7 18% 2 5% 7 18% 1 3% 40 100%
Resident Street Address
Monday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to SundayRetain existing No answer Total
Page 116
![Page 117: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 4
Q.2.b. I am in favour of replacing the existing parking restrictions in Tucker Street with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 3 60% 2 40% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 33 83% 3 8% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%
Q.2.c. Between Monday and Friday, the current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 12 80% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 1 14% 7 18%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 36 90% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%
2. Survey Results - TUCKER STREET
Tucker Street
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
1 Hour Meter
Parking
2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer
Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm No answer Total
Total
Page 117
![Page 118: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 5
Q.2.d. On Saturdays, the current parking restrictions expire at 11:00pm. I would like them to be modified to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 30 75% 6 15% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%
Q.2.e. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 10 67% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 2 13% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%
Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 2 40% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 26 65% 4 10% 3 8% 4 10% 3 8% 40 100%
TotalResident Street Address
Retain existingMonday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer
Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm No answer Total
Page 118
![Page 119: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 6
Q.3.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Carlow Street 11 73% 2 13% 1 7% 1 7% 15 38%
Miller Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 3 75% 1 25% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 28 70% 9 23% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%
Q.2.c. The current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 7 18%
Carlow Street 11 73% 2 13% 2 13% 15 38%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 36 90% 2 5% 2 5% 40 100%
Resident Street Address
Resident Street Address
3. Survey Results - CASSINS AVENUE
Cassins Avenue
Retain existing 1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer Total
Retain existing 10pm No answer Total
Page 119
![Page 120: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 7
Q.3.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Carlow Street 11 73% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%
Miller Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 20% 3 60% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner 0%
West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner 0%
Cassins Avenue 3 75% 1 25% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 28 70% 6 15% 1 3% 4 10% 1 3% 40 100%
Resident Street AddressRetain existing
Monday to Friday
ONLY Monday to Saturday TotalMonday to Sunday No answer
Page 120
![Page 121: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 8
Q.4.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 9 60% 2 13% 1 7% 3 20% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 27 68% 7 18% 2 5% 4 10% 40 100%
Q.4.c. The current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 35 88% 1 3% 2 5% 2 5% 40 100%
Resident Street Address
Resident Street Address
Total
4. Survey Results - CASSINS LANE
Cassins Lane
Retain existing 8pm 10pm No answer
Retain existing 1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter
ParkingNo answer
Total
Page 121
![Page 122: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Area 21 – Survey Results
Page | 9
Q.4.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):
Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %
Carlow Street 9 60% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%
Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%
Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%
Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 20% 3 60% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%
Non-resident owner
West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%
Business Owner
Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%
Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%
Grand Total 27 68% 6 15% 1 3% 4 10% 2 5% 40 100%
Resident Street AddressTotalNo answerMonday to SundayMonday to Saturday
Monday to Friday
ONLY Retain existing
Page 122
![Page 123: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Area 21 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone IDStreet
Street No.Weekday Average Occupancy No. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
Carlow Street 87%
1836 Carlow Street 24-46 100% 52 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
1837 Carlow Street `7-21 94% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
1837A Carlow Street - 93% 710 Minute Parking 8.30am - 10am 4pm - 6pm Mon - Fri
10 Minute Parking 8.30am - 10am 4pm - 6pm Mon - Fri2 Hour Parking 10.00am-4pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days. Generally residents in this section of Carlow Street support 2 Hour parking.
1837B Carlow Street - 100% 3 Unrestricted Parking2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.Generally residents in this section of Carlow Street support 2 Hour parking.
1837C Carlow Street - 63% 4 Unrestricted Parking Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
1837D Carlow Street 5 100% 4 Unrestricted Parking Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
Area 21 - Survey Analysis Page 1 of 3
Page 123
![Page 124: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Area 21 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone IDStreet
Street No.Weekday Average Occupancy No. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
1838 Carlow Street 69 100% 32 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days .
1839 Carlow Street `6-10 83% 31 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
1840 Carlow Street `12-12A 100% 3 Unrestricted Parking Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
1841 Carlow Street `14-36 73% 131 Hour Parking 8.30am - 9pm Mon - Sun Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.
Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.
Tucker Street 78%
1842 Tucker Street 2 81% 81 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 83% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking and 11% support metered parking. 83% retain exisitng parking restrictions.
74% from Carlow Street residents do not support changes. No response from Tucker Street residents
1843 Tucker Street - 70% 51 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri 8.30am - 11pm Sat Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 83% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking and 11% support metered parking. 83% retain exisitng parking restrictions.
74% from Carlow Street residents do not support changes. No response from Tucker Street residents
1843A Tucker Street - 83% 31 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 83% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking and 11% support metered parking. 83% retain exisitng parking restrictions.
74% from Carlow Street residents do not support changes. No response from Tucker Street residents
Area 21 - Survey Analysis Page 2 of 3
Page 124
![Page 125: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Area 21 - Proposed Parking Changes
Zone IDStreet
Street No.Weekday Average Occupancy No. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments
1844 Tucker Street 38 79% 71 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 83% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking and 11% support metered parking. 83% retain exisitng parking restrictions.
74% from Carlow Street residents do not support changes. No response from Tucker Street residents
Cassins Avenue 90%
1846A Cassins Avenue `2-10 100% 42 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 70% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 23% of respondents requested 1 hour parking and 5% support metered parking. 90% want to retain exisitng parking restrictions.
100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.
1846B Cassins Avenue 1 80% 52 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 70% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 23% of respondents requested 1 hour parking and 5% support metered parking. 90% want to retain exisitng parking restrictions.
100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.
Cassins Lane 83%
1845 Cassins Lane - 75% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21
Retain
Overall 78% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 18% of respondents requested 1 hour parking and 5% support metered parking. 88% want to retain exisitng parking restrictions.
100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.No response from Cassins Lane residents
1846 Priory Road - 90% 3 Unrestricted Parking Retain
Overall 78% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 18% of respondents requested 1 hour parking and 5% support metered parking. 88% want to retain exisitng parking restrictions.
100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.No response from Cassins Lane residents
Area 21 - Survey Analysis Page 3 of 3
Page 125
![Page 126: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Area 21
North Sydney CouncilCopyright:
Copyright © North Sydney Council - No part of this map may be reproducedwithout permission. Commercial decisions should not be made based on information contained in this map without first checking details held by the responsible Government authority.
Further details can be obtained by calling (02) 9936 8100 or e-mail [email protected].
Area 19
Area 20
Area 21
Area 22
13-15
2418
28
1412
7
10
15
(9) 11
2630
2832
40
(34) (36) (38)
37
35
54
46
83
39
85
56
6268
4446
-48
64
87
60
9189
38-4
042
66
5658
A
36
23
5052
54
2
21
58
70
6
86-8
884
8280
47
7278
76
45
(U1 14)
6359
A
4
73
43
6567
8583
7573
A71
49
8
81
61
5153
96
41
59
77
31
57
33
79
7425
102A
9894
55
92
100
90
104
92A
102
37
(93)
87
106
108
35
71A
6911
411
0
114112106 108 110
104
112
81
43
122
128
126
124
116
130
105
111-121
107109
103
8991
93
89A
107
6
105
103
2
1
101
9997
97A
95
4
134
125
1814
1
108
140
150
(23) (25)
16
22
136
23
26 28 30 32
20 22 24
125B
152
127
148
34 36
138
2-10
12
(7-21)
12A2
4
(264
)
168
270
282
288-
290
292
296
298
283A
300
302
304
170
306
308
310
314
312
(330C)
(330B)
(330A)
330A
330
316
34
BERN
ARD
LA
NE
ROA
D C
LOSU
RE
BERN
ARD
LANE
BERN
ARD
LANE
TUCK
ER S
TREE
T
MYRTLE STREET
EMMETT STREET
FIG TREE LANE (Private Road)
RID
GE
LAN
E
CASSINS AVENUE
CASS
INS
LANE
CU
NN
ING
HA
M S
TREE
T
EMMETT LANE
HAZELBANK PLACE
RIDGE STREET
CARLOW STREET
BERN
ARD
LANE
HAYBERRY LANE
RODB
ORO
UGH
AVEN
UE
HAYBERRY STREET
FALCON STREET
FALCON STREET
MIL
LER
STRE
ET
WES
T ST
REET
FALCON STREET
1765
1795
1788CS
1849
1788
1799
1817
1811CS
1798
1851A
1818
1811
1816
1858
1794
1859
1793
1764
1776
1792
1787
1776CS
1791
1786
1790
1819
1785
1789A
1860
1837C
1838
1789
1837MZ
1784A
1861
1784
1846
1821
1845
1820
1839
1827
1829MB
2248
1844
1834
18411837D
1846C
1843A
2254A
1783
1846A
2092A
1828
1823
1862
1842
1837A
1837B
1843
1840
1846B
1822
1836
1833
1835
1832
1830
1831
1831MB
1831
1829
1829A
1829
2253
2252
1837
1843
18421844
1843A
1837A1836
1841
18371837B
18401839
1837D
1838
1837MZ1837C
1846C
18451846
1846B
1846A
Page 126
![Page 127: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Item 5.1 . - Traffic - 26/7/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L R E P O R T S
To the General Manager Attach: 1. Abandoned Vehicles and
2. Unattended Boat Trailers Report
SUBJECT: (5.1) Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report
AUTHOR: Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
Report of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the reporting
period of 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019.
Year to date (2019) Council had investigated 247 reports of abandoned vehicles.
Year to date (2019) Council processed 49 reports of unattended boat trailers.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers
Processed Report be received.
Page 127
![Page 128: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (2)
Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
ABANDONED VEHICLES PROCESSED DURING THE PERIOD FROM 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019
Ref #
* indicates
completed
Location Reported
Not Abandoned Actioned as an Abandoned Vehicle
Advised by
owner not
abandoned
Moved so cannot
be considered
abandoned
Unregistered but not
abandoned. Referred
to Police for
enforcement action
Impound
process
commenced
Impounded Disposed at
Auction
044/19* Gillies St, Wollstonecraft (cnr Shirley Rd) 21/1/19 22/1/19 25/2/19 7/6/19
069/19* Opp 7A Spruson St, Neutral Bay 30/1/19 5/2/19 24/2/19 17/5/19
082/19* 1A Christie St, Wollstonecraft 8/2/19 14/2/19 28/2/19 13/5/19
095/19 King St, Waverton (opp 1 McKye St) 7/2/19 14/2/19
ongoing
9/3/19
106/19 Harrison St, Cremorne (cnr Wycombe Rd) 15/2/19 14/2/19
ongoing
12/3/19
109/19* Hazelbank Rd, Wollstonecraft (cnr Ivy St) 16/2/19 14/2/19 18/3/19 21/5/19
119/19 54 Shellcove Rd, Kurraba Point 24/2/19 28/2/19
ongoing
11/6/19
131/19* Near 200 Kurraba Rd, Kurraba Point 4/3/19 4/3/19 12/3/19 17/5/19
146/19 Opp 22 Mackenzie St, Lavender Bay 21/3/19 25/3/19
ongoing
4/4/19
148/19 2 Ivy St, Wollstonecraft 22/3/19 25/3/19
ongoing
12/4/19
151/19 40 Rangers Rd, Cremorne 26/3/19 28/3/19
ongoing
11/4/19
155/19 2 Earle St, Cremorne 27/3/19 28/3/19
ongoing
13/5/19
165/19 Opp 77 Rosalind St, Cammeray 8/4/19 9/4/19
ongoing
179/19 Wood St, Waverton (cnr Balls Head Rd) 28/4/19 2/5/19
ongoing
18/6/19
190/19 19 Raymond Rd, Neutral Bay 13/5/19 21/5/19
ongoing
17/6/19
Page 128
![Page 129: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (3)
Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
Ref #
* indicates
completed
Location Reported
Not Abandoned Actioned as an Abandoned Vehicle
Advised by
owner not
abandoned
Moved so cannot
be considered
abandoned
Unregistered but not
abandoned. Referred
to Police for
enforcement action
Impound
process
commenced
Impounded Disposed at
Auction
194/19* 94A Spofforth St, Cremorne 22/5/19 ✓
195/19 Hipwood St, Kirribilli (Car Park) 22/5/19 23/5/19
ongoing
1/7/19
196/19* Waters L, Cremorne 26/5/19 ✓
197/19* 55A Wycombe Rd, Neutral Bay 26/5/19 ✓
198/19* 74-76 Upper Pitt St, Kirribilli 27/5/19 ✓
199/19* 17 Thrupp St, Neutral Bay 27/5/19 ✓
200/19* 4 McDougall St, Kirribilli 27/5/19 ✓
201/19* 76 Merlin St, Neutral Bay 29/5/19 ✓
202/19 74 Merlin St, Neutral Bay 29/5/19 30/5/19
ongoing
203/19* Park Ave, Neutral Bay (cnr Military Rd) 29/5/19 ✓
204/19* Park Ave, Neutral Bay (cnr Military Rd) 29/5/19 ✓
205/19* Brothers Ave, Cammeray (Tunks Park) 29/5/19 ✓
206/19* Gerard St, Cremorne (opp 1 Ada St) 30/5/19 ✓
207/19 2 Stratford St, Cammeray 31/5/19 31/5/19
ongoing
1/7/19
208/19* 30 Grasmere Rd, Cremorne 31/5/19 ✓
209/19* 4 Cassins Ave, North Sydney 30/5/19 ✓
210/19 88 Alfred St Sth, Milsons Point 30/5/19 4/6/19
ongoing
211/19* 8 Rodborough Ave, Crows Nest 2/6/19 ✓
212/19* 184 Kurraba Rd, Kurraba Point 2/6/19 ✓
213/19* 18 Spofforth St, Cremorne 3/6/19 ✓
214/19 Opp 5 Prior Ave, Cremorne Point 3/6/19 4/6/19
ongoing
Page 129
![Page 130: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (4)
Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
Ref #
* indicates
completed
Location Reported
Not Abandoned Actioned as an Abandoned Vehicle
Advised by
owner not
abandoned
Moved so cannot
be considered
abandoned
Unregistered but not
abandoned. Referred
to Police for
enforcement action
Impound
process
commenced
Impounded Disposed at
Auction
215/19* 10 Spofforth St, Cremorne 3/6/19 ✓
216/19* 21 Spruson St, Neutral Bay 4/6/19 ✓
217/19* 103 Cremorne Rd, Cremorne point 5/6/19 ✓
218/19 Anzac Ave, Cammeray (o/s Anzac School) 5/6/19 5/6/19
ongoing
219/19 32B Jenkins St, Cammeray 6/6/19 7/6/19
ongoing
220/19* 11 Fernhurst Ave, Cremorne 11/6/19 ✓
221/19* 1 Christie St, Wollstonecraft 11/6/19 ✓
222/19 55 Whaling Rd, North Sydney 12/6/19 12/6/19
ongoing
223/19* Cammeray Rd, Cammeray (opp Park Ave) 13/6/19 ✓
224/19* 42 Carter St, Cammeray 13/6/19 ✓
225/19* 30 Pine St, Cammeray 13/6/19 ✓
226/19* Merlin St, Neutral Bay (cnr Falcon St) 14/6/19 ✓
227/19* Merlin St, Neutral Bay (cnr Falcon St) 14/6/19 ✓
228/19* Carr St, Waverton (opp Clifton St) 14/6/19 ✓
229/19 Vale St, Cammeray (cnr Abbott St) 14/6/19 18/6/19
ongoing
230/19* 24 Wonga Rd, Cremorne 14/6/19 ✓
231/19* 8 Ada St, Cremorne 17/6/19 ✓
232/19* Opp 73 Rosalind St, Cammeray 19/6/19 ✓
233/19* Opp 15 Lodge Rd, Cremorne 22/6/19 ✓
234/19* Opp 14 McDougall St, Kirribilli 24/6/19 ✓
235/19* 66 Kurraba Rd, Neutral Bay 24/6/19 ✓
236/19* Tunks Park, Brothers Ave, Cammeray 24/6/19 ✓
Page 130
![Page 131: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (5)
Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
Ref #
* indicates
completed
Location Reported
Not Abandoned Actioned as an Abandoned Vehicle
Advised by
owner not
abandoned
Moved so cannot
be considered
abandoned
Unregistered but not
abandoned. Referred
to Police for
enforcement action
Impound
process
commenced
Impounded Disposed at
Auction
237/19* 242 Ben Boyd Rd, Cremorne 26/6/19 ✓
238/19 44A Shirley Rd, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 27/6/19
ongoing
239/19* 6 Boronia St, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 ✓
240/19 41-43 Milray Ave, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 27/6/19
ongoing
241/19 40 Boyle St, Cremorne Point 28/6/19 28/6/19
ongoing
242/19 8 Lower Wycombe Rd, Neutral Bay 28/6/19 1/7/19
ongoing
243/19* Florence L, Cremorne (cnr Murdoch St) 29/6/19 ✓
244/19 Florence L, Cremorne (cnr Murdoch St) 29/6/19 1/7/19
ongoing
245/19 14 Reed St, Cremorne 29/6/19 1/7/19
ongoing
246/19 Reed St, Cremorne (cnr Florence St) 29/6/19 1/7/19
ongoing
247/19 17 The Boulevarde, Cammeray 30/6/19 1/7/19
ongoing
Page 131
![Page 132: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (6)
Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed
UNATTENDED BOAT TRAILERS PROCESSED DURING THE PERIOD FROM 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019
Ref #
* indicates
completed
Location Month Reported
Moved so cannot
be considered
unattended
Actioned as an Unattended Boat Trailer
Impound
process
commenced
Impounded Disposed at
Auction
19/035* Opp. 15 Premier Street, Neutral Bay May ✓
19/036* Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay (o/s Forsyth Park) May ✓
19/037* Tunks Park, Cammeray (within car park) May ✓
19/038 57 King Street, Waverton June
19/039* Opp. 11 Wyagdon Street, North Sydney June ✓
19/040 2A Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay June
19/041 Opp.15 Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay June
19/042 68 Wycombe Road, Neutral Bay June
19/043 67 Shellcove Road, Neutral Bay June
19/044 Little Young Street, Cammeray June
19/045 41 Cowdroy Avenue, Cammeray June
19/046 33 Cammeray Road, Cammeray June
19/047 Tunks Park Car Park, Brothers Ave, Cammeray June
19/048 25 Ryries Parade, Cremorne June
19/049 Opp. 36 Reynolds Street, Cremorne June
Page 132
![Page 133: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Item 5.2 - Traffic – 26/7/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L
To the General Manager
Attach: Nil
SUBJECT: (5.2) Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne - Traffic
Control Signals (TCS)
AUTHOR: Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation
of the North Sydney Traffic Committee:
1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a high
priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to construction.
At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended:
1. THAT Gerard Street/ MacPherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing item
on future Traffic Committee agendas.
The table below provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each
milestone for the project.
Date Project status
April 2019 Consultant brief and request for quotation completed. Quotation
assessment and engagement of a contractor is scheduled for early
May 2019.
May 2019 Site survey completed.
Consultant quotations to undertake design have been received and
are being assessed.
June 2019 Consultant has commenced concept design and traffic assessment.
The drafts are scheduled for completion in early August 2019.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic Control
Signals Standing Item be received.
Page 133
![Page 134: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Item 5.3 - Traffic – 26/7/19
N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L
To the General Manager
Attach: 1. Updates
SUBJECT: (5.3) Standing Item - Military Road B-Line
AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp
DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:
At the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019, it was agreed to add a standing item for
each future traffic committee agenda with regard to B-Line, including matters concerning off-
set parking arrangements due to parking losses along Military Road, and general traffic and
parking matters that arise.
The table overleaf outlines the status of current traffic and parking matters relating to B-Line.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received.
Page 134
![Page 135: NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation](https://reader034.fdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051906/5ff983f7e116bd7d0842f256/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Report of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp
Re: Standing Item – Military Road B-Line (2)
Matter/ Background Update Offset parking
1/7/19: Consultation letters were sent out to residents and businesses on 21/6/17
and posted on Council’s ‘Your Say’ webpage. Submissions close 21/7/19.
At the 523rd Traffic Committee meeting on 22/3/19 it was recommended:
10. THAT the Director Engineering & Property Services negotiate compensation from
Transport for NSW for the loss of meter revenue from 6 on-street parking spaces on
Parraween Street as a result of direct flow-on effects of parking losses on Military Road
associated with the B-Line project. (4.2.1)
11. THAT Council consult with local residents and businesses with regard to parking
changes on Parraween Street at the rear of 330-338 Military Road (Meter ID 5948) to
convert 6 spaces of “2 Hour Meter 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat Permit
Holders Excepted Area 27” to 11.4 metres of “Loading Zone 6am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-
12.30pm Sat” and four (4) spaces of “1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-
12.30pm Sat”; and the parking changes be approved under delegated authority to the
Traffic Engineer, subject to majority support. (4.2.1)
At the 525th Traffic Committee meeting on 14/6/19 it was recommended:
7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be
expedited. (5.3)
8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street
survey. (5.3)
Traffic and Parking Impacts (General Item)
At the 523rd Traffic Committee meeting on 22/3/19 it was recommended:
2. THAT the Mayor write to the Minister with copies to be sent to the Premier, Member
for North Shore and The Centre for Road Safety requesting that a red light camera be
placed on the intersection of Military Road and Spofforth Street and markings be placed
on the road to discourage vehicles queuing across the pedestrian crossings. (4.1)
29/5/19:
Recommendation adopted by Council 29/4/19. Letter sent 28/5/19.
29/5/19:
Council has collected baseline data in the following streets between April 2018 to
April 2019. Subsequent data will be collected in the next month or so to measure
relative changes in traffic conditions since the tidal flow changes were
implemented.
Wycombe Road
Yeo Street
Rangers Road
Ben Boyd Road
Young Street
Gerard Street
Parraween Street
Waters Road
Winnie Street
Grosvenor Street
Cabramatta Road
Spofforth Street
Spencer Road
Murdoch Street
Public Domain Upgrades in B-Line Military Road Corridor Between Neutral Bay and Cremorne 29/5/19:
Tenders have been called for and received for the public domain upgrades which
will commence in July 2019.
Page 135