Norfolk City Council May 8, 2018

13
Regulation of Short Term Rentals Norfolk City Council May 8, 2018

Transcript of Norfolk City Council May 8, 2018

Regulation of

Short Term RentalsNorfolk City Council

May 8, 2018

Winter 2016 – General Assemblyo No locality could restrict short term rentals

o Same bill had to pass in 2017

June 16, 2016 – City Councilo Recommend continuing prohibition

o Recommend working to get “good neighbor” legislation

Summer 2017 – Chapter 741 (Senate Bill 1578)o Localities can require registration

July 11, 2017 – City Councilo Consider regulations for

• Homestays

• Vacation homes

History

July, 2017o City Manager tasks Neighborhood Action Team (NAT) to analyze

the issue

August-September, 2017o Neighborhood Action Team sets up STR subcommittee

• Planning

• Neighborhood Quality

• Police

• Fire

• ODU

• Health Department

• Commonwealth’s Attorney

o STR subcommittee completes research and recommends

allowing activity: “carrot & stick” approach

History

November 11 & 13, 2017

o Town Halls (Pretlow Library and Virginia Arts Festival)

o High turnout of STR supporters

March 1, 2018

o New Zoning Ordinance• Only permitted in single-family dwellings in R-C (Residential

Coastal) district

• Requires CUP from City Council

History

Analysis

The Market

o Airbnb in Norfolk = 279 listings 1

o VRBO (Homeaway) in Norfolk = 10 listings 1

o Flipkey (Tripadvisor) in Norfolk = 1 listing 1

o Average annual revenue per operator for Airbnb in Norfolk =

$5,700 2

o Average stay is 2 nights 2

o 8% occupancy tax = $456

o $2.00 Room night tax = $225 3

o With 150 active hosts, annual tax revenue from Airbnb would be

± $100,000 4

1 Search performed May 7, 2018, 2 adult guests, rental on June 29 for 2 nights2 Source: Airbnb, letter from Brandon K. Hatton to Mayor Alexander (Jul. 18, 2017)3 Assuming avg. rate of $100/night4 Assuming 100% host compliance

Looked at other localities

Analysis

o Annapolis, MD

o Austin, TX

o Charleston, SC

o Chicago, IL

o Louisville, KY

o Memphis, TN

o Portland, OR

o Santa Monica, CA

o Albemarle (County)

o Arlington (County)

o Bedford (County)

o Blacksburg (Town)

o Botetourt (County)

o Charlottesville (City)

o Roanoke (City)

o Warren (County)

o Williamsburg (City)

Analysis

Registry alone is not a solution

o STR operations occurring now, with no permitting

o Prohibition does not result in preventing the activity

o Registration only presents a burden for:• Lawful operators

• Unlawful operators who get caught

o Registry authorized by 2017 legislation has many exemptions

o Mandatory registration has low compliance in other cities

Enforcement alone is not a solution

o Current prohibition has not prevented the activity

o Additional enforcement might result in less activity

o Unlikely that the activity can be stopped entirely

o Del. Knight (Va. Beach-Ches.) introduced HB824:• Prohibit Lexington from regulating any stays longer than 30 days

• Prohibit Lexington from requiring a business license or BPOL taxes

• Declare that SRT in Sandbridge is a “principal use” subject to

applicable City of Va. Beach regulations

Analysis

A Cautionary Taleo Localities have generally taken a permissive approach

o Lexington adopted a new zoning ordinance in Oct. 2017

o Regulated short term rentals:• Inspections

• Permit and business license required

• Parking rules

• Contact person

• Taxes

Analysis

Subcommittee identifies “carrot & stick” approach

o Work with the market• Enable good operators

• Discourage bad operators

• Retain control to stop operators that start good but turn bad

o Make it easy to operate in the open• Free registration

• By right operation with registration

o Enhance enforcement and impose monetary penalties• Search out illegal operations using online resources

• Impose penalties for zoning violations

o Level the playing field with other transient occupancy

businesses

o Do not overregulate and invite a “fix” from the General

Assembly

Proposal

Homestay

o Allowed by right citywide

o Owner must be present

o Zoning Certificate required• Not allowed where an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) already

exists on the property

o Max. Occupancy = 2 guests per bedroom

o Max. Length of Stay = 29 days (per guest per year)

o If a boarder resides in the home, one bedroom must be set aside

for each boarder (maximum of 2)

o Business license and transient occupancy taxes required

Proposal

Vacation Home

o Allowed in two ways:• By Zoning Certificate, if operator registers

• By Conditional Use Permit (CUP)

o Specific operational conditions imposed as part of the

Certificate or CUP• Off-street parking spaces required (1 per br.)

• In-town manager on call

• Fire inspection

• Posting of City ordinances on noise, trash pick-up, etc.

conspicuously in guest areas

• Max. occupancy

• Expires in 1 year

o Max. Length of Stay = 29 days

o Business license and transient occupancy taxes required

Proposal

Registration

o Not required – optional

o Information to be submitted by operators who register:

• Name of operator

• 24-hour emergency contact

• Annual fire inspection (no charge)

• Operator keeps log of stays and guests

• Provide proof of liability insurance

• Identify number of bedrooms available to guests

• Identify adequate parking (1 space per guest br.)

• Valid for one year (must renew annually)

o Benefits• “Norfolk Registered” badge appears on listing

• Vacation Homes not required to secure CUP

• Listed on City website: “Norfolk Registered”

Proposal

The 3-part Approach

o Create the opportunity to operate legally• Including neighborhood protection rules for Vacation Homes

o Set up a Registry• Enable open, lawful, safe operations

o Increase Enforcement• Help good operators crowd bad operators out of the market

• Protect neighborhoods

• Maximize operator revenues = maximize tax revenues