Masahito Ueda and Yuki Kawaguchi- Spinor Bose-Einstein condensates
Nonlinear quantum optics for spinor slow...
1
Nonlinear quantum optics for spinor slow light Julius Ruseckas 1 Viaˇ ceslav Kudriaˇ sov 1 Algirdas Mekys 1 Tomas Andrijauskas 1 Ite A. Yu 2,3 Gediminas Juzeli¯ unas 1 1 Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Lithuania 2 Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 3 Center for Quantum Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan Abstract We investigate quantum nonlinear effects at a level of individual quanta in a double tripod atom-light coupling scheme involving two atomic Rydberg states [1]. In such a scheme the slow light coherently coupled to strongly interacting Rydberg states represents a two-component or spinor light [2]. The scheme provides additional possibilities for the control and manipulation of light quanta. A distinctive feature of the proposed setup is that it combines the spin-orbit coupling for the spinor slow light with an interaction between the photons, enabling generation of the second probe beam even when two-photon detuning is zero. Furthermore, the interaction between the photons can become repulsive if the one-photon detunings have opposite signs. This is different from a single ladder atom-light coupling scheme [3], in which the interaction between the photons is attractive for both positive and negative detunings, as long as the Rabi frequency of the control beam is not too large. [1] J. Ruseckas, V. Kudriaˇ sov, A. Mekys, T. Andrijauskas, Ite A. Yu, and G. Juzeli¯ unas, arXiv:1805.00144 [quant-ph]; accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A (2018). [2] M.-J. Lee, J. Ruseckas, Ch.-Y. Lee, V. Kudriaˇ sov, K.-F. Chang, H.-W. Cho, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and I. A. Yu, Nat. Commun. 5, 5542 (2014). [3] O. Firstenberg, T. Peyronel, Q.-Y. Liang, A. V. Gorshkov, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuleti´ c, Nature 502, 71 (2013). Spinor slow light M.-J. Lee, J. Ruseckas, et al, Nat. Commun. 5, 5542 (2014). Matrix representation — Spinor slow light: E = E 1 E 2 , ˆ Ω= Ω 11 Ω 12 Ω 21 Ω 22 , ˆ δ = δ 1 0 0 δ 2 δ 1 and δ 2 are the detunings from two-photon resonance. Equation for two-component probe field in the atomic cloud: (c -1 +ˆ v -1 ) ∂ ∂t E + ∂ ∂z E + iˆ v -1 ˆ DE =0 Similar to the equation for probe field in Λ scheme, only with matrices. ˆ D = ˆ Ω ˆ δ ˆ Ω -1 is a matrix due to two-photon detuning, ˆ v = c g 2 ˆ Ω ˆ Ω † is a matrix of group velocity (not necessarily diagonal). Two-photon detuning causes oscillations in the intensities of transmitted probe fields Detuning can be caused by the interaction. For example: generation of correlated two-photon states due interaction between Rydberg atoms J. Ruseckas, I. A. Yu, G. Juzelinas, Phys. Rev. A 95, 023807 (2017). Quantum nonlinear optics using Rydberg atoms A. V. Gorshkov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133602 (2011). T. Peyronel et al, Nature 488, 57 (2012). Double tripod scheme with Rydberg levels J. Ruseckas et al, arXiv:1805.00144 [quant-ph]; accepted in Phys. Rev. A (2018). Double tripod atom-light coupling scheme involving the Rydberg levels s 1 and s 2 . |S 1 i∼ Ω 11 |s 1 i +Ω 12 |s 2 i , |S 2 i∼ Ω 21 |s 1 i +Ω 22 |s 2 i Probe fields E 1 and E 2 are coupled via atomic coherences if hS 1 |S 2 i6 =0 The probe fields are assumed to be sufficiently weak at the input, so that the contribution due to more than two photons is not important. Equal one-photon detunings Approximate closed equation for two-photon amplitudes Φ E j E l : i∂ R Φ E j E l = -4L abs ˜ Δ Γ ∂ 2 r Φ E j E l + i ¯ v - L abs ˜ Δ Γ V (r ) X m (v l,m ∂ r Φ E j E m - v j,m ∂ r Φ E m E l ) + V (r ) ¯ v - L abs ˜ Δ Γ V (r ) X m,n A jl,mn Φ E m E n spin-orbit coupling interaction Here R = 1 2 (z + z 0 ), r = z - z 0 ,¯ v = 1 2 (v 1,1 + v 2,2 ), ˜ Δ = 2Δ - iΓ 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 -4 -2 0 2 4 a) G (2) 1,1 (0) Δ/Γ 0 2·10 -3 4·10 -3 6·10 -3 8·10 -3 -4 -2 0 2 4 b) G (2) 2,2 (0) Δ/Γ 0 1·10 -5 2·10 -5 3·10 -5 4·10 -5 5·10 -5 -4 -2 0 2 4 c) G (2) 1,2 (0) Δ/Γ Only the first probe beam with the amplitude a is incident on the atom cloud; v 1,2 /v 1,1 =1/2. Second-order correlation functions normalized to the intensity of the incident probe beam G (2) j,l (0) = 1 a 4 |Φ E j E l (R = L, r = 0)| 2 Photons are transferred from the first to the second probe beam even in the case of zero two-photon detuning. Opposite signs of one-photon detunings The approximations leading to the single closed equation are not valid when detunings are different. No transfer of photons between probe beams. � � �� �� �� �� �� � � �� �� �� �� �� �/� ��� ��/� ��� �) ���� ���� ���� ���� � � �� �� �� �� �� � � �� �� �� �� �� �/� ��� ��/� ��� �) ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� Square of the absolute value of the two-photon wave function a) |Φ E 1 E 1 | 2 and b) |Φ E 1 E 2 | 2 , when one-photon detunings have opposite signs; Δ/Γ=2.5 The decrease of the second-order correlation function G (2) 1,2 (0) represnts an effective repulsion between the photons from different probe beams Acknowledgements The work was supported by the project TAP LLT-2/2016 of the Research Council of Lithuania and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Nos. 104-2119-M-007-004 and 105-2923-M-007-002-MY3. [email protected] http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas
Transcript of Nonlinear quantum optics for spinor slow...
Nonlinear quantum optics for spinorslow light
Julius Ruseckas1 Viaceslav Kudriasov1 Algirdas Mekys1 Tomas Andrijauskas1 Ite A. Yu2,3 Gediminas Juzeliunas1
1Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University, Lithuania2Department of Physics, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
3Center for Quantum Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan
AbstractWe investigate quantum nonlinear effects at a level of individual quanta in a double tripodatom-light coupling scheme involving two atomic Rydberg states [1]. In such a scheme the slowlight coherently coupled to strongly interacting Rydberg states represents a two-component orspinor light [2]. The scheme provides additional possibilities for the control and manipulationof light quanta. A distinctive feature of the proposed setup is that it combines the spin-orbitcoupling for the spinor slow light with an interaction between the photons, enabling generationof the second probe beam even when two-photon detuning is zero. Furthermore, theinteraction between the photons can become repulsive if the one-photon detunings haveopposite signs. This is different from a single ladder atom-light coupling scheme [3], in whichthe interaction between the photons is attractive for both positive and negative detunings, aslong as the Rabi frequency of the control beam is not too large.
[1] J. Ruseckas, V. Kudriasov, A. Mekys, T. Andrijauskas, Ite A. Yu, and G. Juzeliunas,
arXiv:1805.00144 [quant-ph]; accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A (2018).
[2] M.-J. Lee, J. Ruseckas, Ch.-Y. Lee, V. Kudriasov, K.-F. Chang, H.-W. Cho, G. Juzeliunas, and I. A. Yu,
Nat. Commun. 5, 5542 (2014).
[3] O. Firstenberg, T. Peyronel, Q.-Y. Liang, A. V. Gorshkov, M. D. Lukin, and V. Vuletic, Nature 502, 71 (2013).
Spinor slow light
M.-J. Lee, J. Ruseckas, et al, Nat. Commun. 5, 5542 (2014).
Matrix representation — Spinor slow light:
E =
(E1
E2
), Ω =
(Ω11 Ω12
Ω21 Ω22
), δ =
(δ1 00 δ2
)δ1 and δ2 are the detunings from two-photon resonance.Equation for two-component probe field in the atomic cloud:
(c−1 + v−1)∂
∂tE +
∂
∂zE + iv−1DE = 0
Similar to the equation for probe field in Λ scheme, only with matrices.D = ΩδΩ−1 is a matrix due to two-photon detuning,
v =c
g2ΩΩ†
is a matrix of group velocity (not necessarily diagonal).
Two-photon detuning causes oscillations in the intensities of transmitted probe fields
Detuning can be caused by the interaction. For example: generation of correlated two-photonstates due interaction between Rydberg atomsJ. Ruseckas, I. A. Yu, G. Juzelinas, Phys. Rev. A 95, 023807 (2017).
Quantum nonlinear optics using Rydberg atoms
A. V. Gorshkov et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 133602 (2011).T. Peyronel et al, Nature 488, 57 (2012).
Double tripod scheme with Rydberg levels
J. Ruseckas et al, arXiv:1805.00144 [quant-ph]; accepted in Phys. Rev. A (2018).
Double tripod atom-light coupling schemeinvolving the Rydberg levels s1 and s2. |S1〉 ∼ Ω11|s1〉 + Ω12|s2〉 , |S2〉 ∼ Ω21|s1〉 + Ω22|s2〉
Probe fields E1 and E2 are coupled via atomiccoherences if 〈S1|S2〉 6= 0
The probe fields are assumed to be sufficiently weak at the input, so that the contribution dueto more than two photons is not important.
Equal one-photon detunings
Approximate closed equation for two-photon amplitudes ΦEjEl :
i∂RΦEjEl = −4Labs∆
Γ∂2rΦEjEl
+i
v − Labs∆ΓV (r)
∑m
(vl,m∂rΦEjEm − vj,m∂rΦEmEl)
+V (r)
v − Labs∆ΓV (r)
∑m,n
Ajl,mnΦEmEn
spin-orbit coupling interaction
Here R =1
2(z + z′), r = z − z′, v =
1
2(v1,1 + v2,2), ∆ = 2∆− iΓ
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
-4 -2 0 2 4
a)
G(2
)1,
1 (0)
Δ/Γ
0
2·10-3
4·10-3
6·10-3
8·10-3
-4 -2 0 2 4
b)
G(2
)2,
2 (0)
Δ/Γ
0
1·10-5
2·10-5
3·10-5
4·10-5
5·10-5
-4 -2 0 2 4
c)
G(2
)1,
2 (0)
Δ/Γ
Only the first probe beam with the amplitude a is incident on the atom cloud; v1,2/v1,1 = 1/2.Second-order correlation functions normalized to the intensity of the incident probe beam
G(2)j,l (0) =
1
a4|ΦEjEl(R = L, r = 0)|2
Photons are transferred from the first to the second probe beam even in the case of zerotwo-photon detuning.
Opposite signs of one-photon detunings
The approximations leading to the single closed equation are not valid when detunings aredifferent.
No transfer ofphotons betweenprobe beams.
/
/
)
/
/
)
Square of the absolute value of the two-photon wave function a) |ΦE1E1|2and b) |ΦE1E2|2, when one-photon detunings have opposite signs; ∆/Γ = 2.5
The decrease of the second-order correlation function G(2)1,2(0) represnts an effective repulsion
between the photons from different probe beams
AcknowledgementsThe work was supported by the project TAP LLT-2/2016 of the Research Council ofLithuania and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under GrantNos. 104-2119-M-007-004 and 105-2923-M-007-002-MY3.
[email protected] http://web.vu.lt/tfai/j.ruseckas
