Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

10
Int J Theor Phys DOI 10.1007/s10773-013-1993-5 Noncommutative Wormholes in f (R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution Farook Rahaman · Ayan Banerjee · Mubasher Jamil · Anil Kumar Yadav · Humaira Idris Received: 30 October 2013 / Accepted: 28 December 2013 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 Abstract In this paper, we derive some new exact solutions of static wormholes in f (R) gravity supported by the matter possesses Lorentzian density distribution of a particle-like gravitational source. We derive the wormhole’s solutions in two possible schemes for a given Lorentzian distribution: assuming an astrophysically viable F(R) function such as a power-law form and discuss several solutions corresponding to different values of the exponent (here F = df dR ). In the second scheme, we consider particular form of two shape functions and have reconstructed f (R) in both cases. We have discussed all the solutions with graphical point of view. Keywords Wormhole · Non-commutative geometry · Modified gravity F. Rahaman (B ) · A. Banerjee Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, India e-mail: [email protected] A. Banerjee e-mail: [email protected] M. Jamil · H. Idris School of Natural Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad, Pakistan M. Jamil e-mail: [email protected] H. Idris e-mail: [email protected] A.K. Yadav Department of Physics, Anand Engineering College, Keetham, Agra 282 007, India e-mail: [email protected]

Transcript of Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Page 1: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor PhysDOI 10.1007/s10773-013-1993-5

Noncommutative Wormholes in f (R) Gravitywith Lorentzian Distribution

Farook Rahaman · Ayan Banerjee · Mubasher Jamil ·Anil Kumar Yadav · Humaira Idris

Received: 30 October 2013 / Accepted: 28 December 2013© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Abstract In this paper, we derive some new exact solutions of static wormholes in f (R)

gravity supported by the matter possesses Lorentzian density distribution of a particle-likegravitational source. We derive the wormhole’s solutions in two possible schemes for agiven Lorentzian distribution: assuming an astrophysically viable F(R) function such asa power-law form and discuss several solutions corresponding to different values of theexponent (here F = df

dR). In the second scheme, we consider particular form of two shape

functions and have reconstructed f (R) in both cases. We have discussed all the solutionswith graphical point of view.

Keywords Wormhole · Non-commutative geometry · Modified gravity

F. Rahaman (B) · A. BanerjeeDepartment of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata 700 032, West Bengal, Indiae-mail: [email protected]

A. Banerjeee-mail: [email protected]

M. Jamil · H. IdrisSchool of Natural Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), H-12, Islamabad,Pakistan

M. Jamile-mail: [email protected]

H. Idrise-mail: [email protected]

A.K. YadavDepartment of Physics, Anand Engineering College, Keetham, Agra 282 007, Indiae-mail: [email protected]

Page 2: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

1 Introduction

The geometry of a static and stationary spherically symmetric wormhole consists of a two-mouthed tunnel (referred as a tube, throat, or handle in the literature). This tube like struc-ture is a multiply connected spacetime which can join two asymptotically flat regions ofthe same spacetime or two different spacetimes. The possibility of two way travel in timebecomes theoretically possible when the two regions belong to the same spacetime, suchphenomenon is time machine. The wormhole spacetime has been investigated in the litera-ture in various schemes such as a non-static axially symmetric wormhole [1–4], wormholeswith cylindrical symmetry [5], wormholes supported by a cosmological constant [6, 7], thin-shell wormholes [8–12], and electrically charged static wormholes [13, 14] (For a review see[15]). Morris and Thorne [16, 17] suggested the idea of a traversable wormhole suitable fortravel by humans for interstellar journey and beyond. Later on wormholes were investigatedin the cosmological context and theorized to be enlarged through a mechanism similar tocosmological inflation [18]. Wormholes present esoteric properties such as a violation of theHawking chronology protection conjecture and give faster-than-light scenarios, breakdownof causality [19]. The matter energy supporting the exotic geometry violates the standardenergy conditions and hence termed ‘exotic’. However this exotic behavior can be avoidedby studying wormholes in extended theories of gravity such as f (R) gravity and thread-ing wormholes with normal matter. The violation of energy conditions can be avoided onaccount of curvature effects arising near the wormhole’s throat.

In an earlier work by Lobo et al. [20], the authors investigated the geometry and stabilityof stationary and static wormholes in f (R) gravity. They obtained the wormhole’s solutionsby assuming various forms of equations of state and viable shape functions. They showedthat in their model, the energy conditions are satisfied in the desired range of radial coordi-nate. We here perform a similar analysis of [20] however, taking into account a Lorentziandensity distribution of a point gravitational source [21]. We derive the wormhole’s solutionsin two possible schemes for a given Lorentzian distribution: assuming an astrophysicallyviable F(R) function such as a power-law form: F(R) = aRm and have discussed sev-eral solutions corresponding to different values of the exponential parameter. In the secondscheme, for the specific choice of the shape functions we have reconstructed f (R). We alsocheck the energy conditions for both schemes.

Our plan of work is as follows: In Sect. 2, we write down the field equations of a Morris-Thorne wormhole in f (R) gravity supported by anisotropic matter. In Sect. 3, we solve thefield equations by assuming a power-law form: F(R) = aRm and discussed several solutionscorresponding to different values of m. In Sect. 4, we solve the same field equations byinserting specific forms of shape functions and have reconstructed f (R) in all cases and weconclude in Sect. 5.

2 Field Equations in F(R) Gravity

The metric describing a static spherically symmetric wormhole spacetime is given by

ds2 = −e2Φ(r)dt2 + dr2

1 − b(r)

r

+ r2(dθ2 + sin2 θdφ2

). (1)

Here, Φ(r) is a gravitational redshift function and b(r) is the shape function. The radialco-ordinate r , decreases from infinity to a minimum value r0, and then increases from r0

Page 3: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

to infinity. The minimum value of r0, represents the location of the wormhole throat whereb(r0) = r0, satisfying the flaring-out condition b − b′r/b2 > 0 and b′(r0) < 1, that are im-posed to have wormhole solution.

For our wormhole in F(R) gravity, we assume that the matter content of the wormholeis anisotropic fluid source whose energy-momentum tensor is given by [15]

T μν = (ρ + pr)u

μuν − prgμν + (pt − pr)η

μην, (2)

with uμuμ = −ημημ = 1, and uμημ = 0. Here the vector uμ is the fluid 4-velocity and ημ isa space-like vector orthogonal to uμ.

Following Lobo et al.’s [20], we have the following gravitational field equations in f (R)

gravity as

ρ(r) = Fb′

r2, (3)

pr(r) = −Fb

r3+ F ′

2r2

(b′r − b

) − F ′′(

1 − b

r

), (4)

pt(r) = −F ′

r

(1 − b

r

)− F

2r3

(b′r − b

). (5)

Here, prime indicate derivative with respect to r and ρ, pr and pt are the energy density,radial pressure and tangential pressure, respectively. These equations are the generic ex-pressions of the matter threading wormhole with constant redshift function which simplifiesthe calculations of field equations, and provide interesting exact wormhole solutions, whereF = df

dRand the curvature scalar, R, is given by

R(r) = 2b′(r)r2

. (6)

3 Wormholes for a Given F(R) Function

We take a power-law form

F(R) = aRm. (7)

Here, a is a constant and m is an integer.We are trying to solve the field equations given above in non-commutative geometry

with Lorentzian distribution. Here we take the energy density of the static and sphericallysymmetric smeared and particle-like gravitational source of the following [21]

ρ = M√

φ

π2(r2 + φ)2. (8)

Here, the mass M could be a diffused centralized object such as a wormhole and θ is non-commutative parameter.

Using Eq. (6) in Eq. (7), gives

F(R) = a

(2b′

r2

)m

. (9)

Page 4: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

Substituting Eqs. (8) and (9) in Eq. (3), we obtain the shape function given by

b(r) =∫

r2

[M

√φ

2mπ2a(r2 + φ)2

] 11+m + C (10)

where C is a constant of integration.To get the exact physical characteristics, we discuss several models resulting for different

choices of m.

3.1 Case: m = 0

From Eq. (10), the assumption m = 0, gives the shape function of the form

b(r) = M√

φ

2aπ2

[arctan( r√φ)

√φ

− r

r2 + φ

]+ C. (11)

By putting (11) in (6), we get

R(r) = 2M√

φ

π2a(r2 + φ)2. (12)

From Eqs. (4) and (5), using the shape function in Eq. (11) the expressions for pressures(radial and tangential) become

Pr(r) = a

r3

[M

√φ

2aπ2

(r

r2 + φ− 1√

φarctan

(r√φ

))− C

], (13)

Pt(r) = M√

φ

4π2r3

[1√φ

arctan

(r√φ

)− r

(r2 + φ)− 2r3

(r2 + φ)2+ 2aCπ2

M√

φ

]. (14)

We consider that the Lorentzian distribution of particle-like gravitational source given inEq. (8), which is positive for the noncommutative parameter θ > 0. The shape function givenin Eq. (11) is asymptotically flat because of b(r)/r → 0 as r → ∞ and the redshift functionis constant everywhere. In Fig. 1, corresponding to m = 0, the throat of the wormhole islocated at r = 1.5, where G(r) = b(r) − r cuts the r-axis (upper right in Fig. 1) and alsoG(r) < 0, i.e., b(r) − r < 0, which implies that b(r) < r for r > r0, satisfy the fundamentalproperty of shape function which indicates in Fig. 1 (upper left). From the Fig. 1, it is alsoclear that, for r > r0, G(r) is decreasing function, therefore G′(r) < 0 and correspondinglyb′(r0) < 1, which satisfies the flare-out condition.

According to a Fig. 1 (left and right, middle position) the radial pressure (pr) is negativeand transverse pressure (pt ) is positive outside the throat of the wormhole for the choiceof the parameters M = 10, C = 1, a = 1 and φ = 1, respectively, which shows that thewormholes violates the null energy condition (NEC) as well as weak energy conditions(WEC).

3.2 Case: m = 1

Similarly, from Eq. (10), we get the shape function for m = 1

b(r) =√

M√

φ

2aπ2

[r − √

φ arctan

(r√φ

)]+ C. (15)

Page 5: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

Fig. 1 Graphs for the case m = 0

The corresponding value of Ricci scalar becomes

R(r) =√

2M√

φ

aπ2(r2 + φ)2. (16)

Moreover, the radial and transverse pressures turn out as

Pr(r) =√

2Ma√

φ

π2

[1

r3(r2 + φ)

[√M

√φ

2aπ2

(√φ arctan

(r√φ

)− r

)− C

]

− 1

r(r2 + φ)2

[√M

√φ

2aπ2

r3

(r2 + φ)−

√M

√φ

2aπ2

(r − √

φ arctan

(r√φ

))− C

]

− (6r4 + 4r2φ − 2φ2)

(r2 + φ)4

[1 −

√M

√φ

2aπ2

(1 −

√φ

rarctan

(r√φ

))− C

r

]]. (17)

Page 6: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

Fig. 2 Plots for case m = 1

Pt(r) =√

2Ma√

φ

π2

[2

(r2 + φ)2

[1 −

√M

√φ

2aπ2

(1 −

√φ

rarctan

(r√φ

))− C

r

]

− 1

2r3(r2 + φ)

[√M

√φ

2aπ2

r3

(r2 + φ)−

√M

√φ

2aπ2

(r − √

φ arctan

(r√φ

))− C

]].

(18)

In Fig. 2, the graphs are drawn for the choice of the same parameters given in Fig. 1,corresponding to m = 1. The throat of the wormhole is located at r ∼ 1.5, where G cutsr-axis and the shape function satisfy all the necessary conditions of as shown in the Figs. 2.

Here also from Fig. 2, (lower left) the Null Energy Condition (NEC) and the Weak EnergyCondition (WEC) are violated, conditions that are necessary to hold a wormhole open. It isinteresting to note that the Strong Energy Condition (SEC) is satisfied which shown in Fig. 2,(lower right).

Page 7: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

4 Wormhole Solution for a Given Shape Function

We developed the literature by considering several interesting shape function.

4.1 Shape Function: b(r) = r0(rr0

Here, we consider a shape function of the form

b(r) = r0

(r

r0

, (19)

which satisfy the flare-out conditions for b′(r0) = α < 1, and that for r → ∞ we haveb(r)/r = (r0/r)1−α → 0.

Putting Eq. (19) in (6), we have

R(r) = 2α

r2

(r

r0

)α−1

. (20)

and, Substituting Eqs. (8) and (19) in (3), we get

F(r) = M√

φ

απ2

(r0

r

)α−1[r2

(r2 + φ)2

]. (21)

Using gravitational field equations (3)–(5), the components of radial and transverse pressure,given by the following form

pr(r) = M√

φ

απ2(r2 + φ)2

[−1 + (α − 1)

2

{(3 − α) − 4r2

r2 + φ

}

+(

1 −(

r

r0

)1−α){(3 − α)(2 − α) + 4(2α − 5)r2

(r2 + φ)+ 8r(2r3 − φ)

(r2 + φ)2

}], (22)

pt(r) = M√

φ

απ2(r2 + φ)2

[(1 − α)

2+

(1 −

(r

r0

)1−α){(3 − α) − 4r2

r2 + φ

}]. (23)

In Fig. 3, the graphs are drawn for the choice of the parameters M = 10, r0 = 1, α = −1and φ = 1, respectively. Here also the throat of the wormhole is located at r ∼ 1.5, whereG cuts r-axis shown in the Fig. 3, (upper right) and the energy conditions are same as inprevious cases shown in left and right lower Fig. 3.

4.2 A Particular Shape Function: b(r) = A tan−1 Cr

Let us consider a shape function of the form

b(r) = A tan−1 Cr, (24)

so that b(r)/r = A tan−1 Cr/r → 0 for r → ∞ (by L’Hospital’s rule), which met the asymp-totically flat conditions. However, one may also verify that b′(r0) = AC/(1+C2r2

0 ) < 1 i.e.,the fundamental property of a wormhole is that a flaring out condition at the throat is metfor the choice of the parameters.

Page 8: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

Fig. 3 Plots for Sect. 4.1

using Eq. (24) in (6), we have

R(r) = 2

r2

(AC

1 + C2r2

). (25)

The form of F(r) function becomes

F(r) = M√

φ

π2AC

r2(1 + C2r2)

(r2 + φ)2. (26)

The components of radial and transverse pressure become

Pr(r) = − M√

φ

π2AC

[A

rtan−1 Cr

(1 + C2r2)

(r2 + φ)2−

(ACr

1 + C2r2− A tan−1 Cr

)

×(

1 + 2C2r2

r(r2 + φ)2− 2(r + C2r3)

(r2 + φ)3

)+

(1 − A

rtan−1 Cr

)

Page 9: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

Fig. 4 Plots Sect. 4.2

×(

2 + 12C2r2

(r2 + φ)2− 4(5r2 + 9C2r4)

(r2 + φ)3+ 24r(r3 + C2r5)

(r2 + φ)4

)], (27)

Pt(r) = − M√

φ

π2AC

[(1 − A

rtan−1 Cr

)(2 + 4C2r2

(r2 + φ)2− 4(r2 + C2r4)

(r2 + φ)3

)

+(

AC

1 + C2r2− A

rtan−1 Cr

)(1 + C2r2

2(r2 + φ)2

)]. (28)

In Fig. 4, the graphs are drawn for the choice of the parameters M = 10, a = 1, A = 2,C = 1 and φ = 1, respectively. Here also the throat of the wormhole is located at r ∼ 2,where G cuts r-axis shown in the Fig. 4, (upper right) and the energy conditions are same asin previous cases shown in left and right lower portion of Fig. 4.

5 Concluding Remarks

In this paper, we derived some new exact solutions of static wormholes in f (R) gravity sup-ported by the matter possesses Lorentzian density distribution of a particle-like gravitational

Page 10: Noncommutative Wormholes in f(R) Gravity with Lorentzian Distribution

Int J Theor Phys

source. We derive the wormhole’s solutions in two possible schemes for a given Lorentziandistribution. The first model assumes the power-law form F(R) whereas the second modeldiscussed assumes a particular shape function which allows the reconstruction of f (R). Forthe power-law form of F(R) with m = 1 is interesting as in this case the null energy con-dition is violated, but the strong energy condition is met. For the second model, we haveconsidered two particular shape functions and have reconstructed f (R) in both cases. Inthese two cases, the null energy condition are once again violated, but the strong energyconditions are met. All the solutions assume zero tidal forces which automatically that thewormholes are traversable [20].

Acknowledgements F.R. is thankful to the authority of Inter-University Center for Astronomy and Astro-physics, Pune, India for providing them Visiting Associateship under which a part of this work was carriedout. A.B. is also thankful to IUCAA for giving him an opportunity to visit IUCAA where a part of thiswork was carried out. F.R. is also thankful UGC, Govt. of India under research award scheme, for providingfinancial support.

References

1. Teo, E.: Phys. Rev. D 58, 024014 (1998)2. Kuhfittig, P.K.F.: Phys. Rev. D 67, 064015 (2003)3. Kashargin, P.E., Sushkov, S.V.:. arXiv:0710.5656 [gr-qc]4. Jamil, M., Kuhfittig, P.K.F., Rahaman, F., Rakib, Sk.A.: Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 513–520 (2010)5. Clement, G.: Phys. Rev. D 51, 6803 (1995)6. Lemos, J.P.S., et al.: Phys. Rev. D 68, 064004 (2003)7. Rahaman, F., et al.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 39, 145 (2007)8. Lemos, J.P.S., Lobo, F.S.N.: Phys. Rev. D 78, 044030 (2008)9. Rahaman, F., et al.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 1687 (2006)

10. Rahaman, F., et al.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 53 (2009)11. Rahaman, F., et al.: Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 155021 (2011)12. Rahaman, F., et al.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 51, 1680 (2012)13. Kim, S.-W., Lee, H.: Phys. Rev. D 63, 064014 (2001)14. Rahaman, F., et al.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48, 1637 (2009)15. Lobo, F.S.N.: arXiv:0710.4474 [gr-qc]16. Morris, M.S., Thorne, K.S.: Am. J. Phys. 56, 395 (1988)17. Morris, M.S., et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1446 (1988)18. Roman, T.A.: Phys. Rev. D 47, 1370 (1993)19. Hawking, S.W.: Phys. Rev. D 46, 603 (1992)20. Lobo, F.S.N., Oliveira, M.A.: Phys. Rev. D 80, 104012 (2009)21. Mehdipour, S.H.: Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 80 (2012)