NIS PERSPECTIVE ON PENSION & PENSION REFORM PREPARED BY: DORSET CROMWELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR NIS.
-
Upload
kelly-fullilove -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of NIS PERSPECTIVE ON PENSION & PENSION REFORM PREPARED BY: DORSET CROMWELL DEPUTY DIRECTOR NIS.
NIS PERSPECTIVE ON PENSION & PENSION REFORM
PREPARED BY: DORSET CROMWELL
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
NIS
OVERVIEW The NIS a legal entity by People Law No. 14 of
1983 Provident Fund which was established in 1969
Benefits include sickness, maternity, funeral, employment injury & pensions.
Contribution of 9% required Allocation to the three benefit branches;
Short-term, Employment Injury and Long-term
Distribution as follows; 1.3%, 0.3% and 7.4% LTB accounted for 82.6% of expenditure in
2010
OVERVIEW 2010 Reserve stood at $697,010,447
Average 10 year increase of 10.3% Average 5 year increase of 9.2%
Reserve as a percentage of GDP of 49.7% Rate of growth Expenditure ratio 16.6 years Up to 2010 collection totaled $694.5M
Earned $381.4 M in investment income
Benefit expenditure totaled $322.9 M $248.6M on pensions and other Long-term
benefits
FINANCIAL OVERVIEW AMOUNT OF RESERVE
Table 15 - Financial projection: Actuarial Balance (in millions), 2009-2069
2009 Year-end Reserves 661Plus PV of Future Contributions 2903
Minus PV of Future Expenditures 5992Equal PV of Surplus/ (Shortfall) (2428)
Actuarial Balance (% of PV of insurable earnings) -7.5%Actuarial Balance (% of 2010 GDP) 171%
GAP of
18.6%
PENSION COST Examined pension history of 696 former age
pensioners Contributed $4.9 million Payments totaled $23.2M Average repayment period of 1 year and 7
months Max repayment of 4 years and 1 month Pensioners received 31.8 times contribution
made
DESIGN CONSIDERATION
Ideal replacement rate in retirement NIS replacement rate Current maximum of 49%. 60% in 2022 What prudent approach? Individual plans
each giving 70-80%; Cost to employers? Cost of doing business in
country? Or integrated pension system/retirement
planning system
6
PENSION REFORM
Parametric reform measures offers a more viable and prudent approach to pension reform; Adjustment to ceiling Normal Retirement Age Contribution rate Accrual Rate Career Average Pension vs. Final Average
Pension Eligibility requirements Access to capital markets
7
PENSION REFORM
However NIS has ceiling of $3,500 increase to $5000 in 2014 Real replacement rate for person above the ceiling Impact of low ceiling on quality of pensions.
Max replacement rate of 49% If salary is $7000 RR will be 24.5%; at $8000 RR will be
21.4%
Ceiling should be high enough not to disadvantage middle to high income earners Ceiling does not stifle National Savings
The timing and magnitude of the increase in the ceiling should be legislated
The same should happen with pension increases 8
PENSION REFORM
Globally improvement in life expectancy Has lead to increasing NRA Adjust age of first payment in keeping with
demographic shifts Number of employer have age 65 as
retirement age Both salaries and pension paid
Coordination of various NRA Shift in NRA for 60 to 65 extends the life of
NIS from 2041 to 2048 Increase over 20 year period 9
PENSION REFORM- RETIREMENT AGE IN SISTER SCHEMES
Anguilla, BVI and the Bahamas NRA is 65 Belize and Bermuda NRA is 65 Jamaica NRA is 65 for men & 60 women Dominica, St. Vincent & Antigua NRA is 60.
Each have actuarial recommendation to move to 65
Barbados is 66 on its way to 67 St. Kitts NRA is 62 St. Lucia is 63 on way to 65
10
CAREER EARNINGS VS. FINAL AVERAGE SALARY
0
Years of Contributions
Ins.
Ear
ning
s
“THERE IS NO LASTING PEACEWITHOUT SOCIAL JUSTICETHERE IS NO SOCIAL JUSTICEWITHOUT SOCIAL SECURITYTHERE IS NO SOCIAL SECURITYWITHOUT SOUND FINANCING”-ILO
12