NIKE Strategic Group1

download NIKE Strategic Group1

of 34

Transcript of NIKE Strategic Group1

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    1/34

    PRESENTED BY:-

    AKRITI NANDAAKASH BASHADEEPIKA N.DIVYA SINGH

    PRITI JAISWAL1

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    2/34

    Major publicly traded clothing, footwear,sportswear, and equipment supplier based in the

    United States Headquartered near Beaverton, Oregon, in

    the Portland metropolitan area

    Revenue in excess of US$19 billion in its fiscal year2010

    Employs more than 34,400 people worldwide as of

    May 2010 2

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    3/34

    Shoes Running Basketball Soccer Sport-inspired urban

    shoes

    Childrens shoes

    Miscellaneous Bags Socks Sports balls Eyewear Timepieces

    Apparels Bats Gloves Protective equipments

    3

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    4/34

    Originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports (BRS)

    Founded by University of Oregon track athlete Philip

    Knight and his coach Bill Bowerman in January 1964 Initially operated as a distributor for Japanese shoe

    maker Onitsuka Tiger (now ASICS)

    Launched its own line of shoes branded as Nike in 1971

    .The Swoosh was first used by Nike on June 18, 1971,

    and was registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark

    Office on January 22, 1974 4

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    5/34

    5

    Internal Rivalry (Low)

    Fierce Competition

    Mature Industry

    Mostly Non-Price competition

    Differentiation strategy

    Industry in consolidation phase

    Threat of New entrants(Low)

    High Barriers to Entry

    Capital Intensive

    Strong Brand Following

    Economies of scale

    High Marketing & R&D Costs

    Industry in consolidation phase

    Bargaining Power of

    Buyer (Low)End user brand loyalty

    Price sensitivity issues

    Retail and vendor consolidations

    Growing power of retail chains

    Good Infrastructure

    Threat of Substitutes (Low)

    Other types of shoes

    Other sport apparel

    Bargaining Power of Supplier(Low)

    Abundantly available rawmaterials

    Cheap resources-commodity item

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    6/34

    Internal Rivalry (High)

    Fierce Competition from globalbrands

    Local players with culturaladvantage

    Threat of New entrants(High)

    Less/Not explored Markets

    Un-Sophisticated market needsLess Capital Intensive

    No major brand following

    Local players advantage

    Bargaining Power of

    Buyer (High)Consumer needs to be educated

    Retailers need to be educated

    High Price sensitivity

    Brand image to be re-established

    Lack of proper infrastructure

    Threat of Substitutes (High)

    Bare foot, walking with slipperse.g. India

    Leather boots and slippers

    Bargaining Power of Supplier(Low)

    Inexpensive labor

    Abundantly available rawmaterials

    Cheap resources-commodity item

    6

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    7/34

    Infrastructure: free space, good roads, joggingparks

    Sports equipments: Backpack, balls, bats, rackets, etc.

    Partnerships with other products arewidening the domains of complementors forsportswear products. E.g. Nike+iPod Sports kit

    7

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    8/348

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    9/349

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    10/34

    The company sells its products to retail accounts, through itsowned retail stores, and through a mix of independentdistributors and licensees, as well as through internet website

    www.nikestore.com

    It has 4 major subsidiaries:

    Converse

    Cole Haan Holdings

    Nike Bauer Hockey

    Hurley International 10

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    11/34

    Technology in ProductsHistorically had some of the most cutting-edgeproducts on the market. E.g. Nike + iPod

    Manufacturing SkillsUse of low cost contract manufacturers, basedoutside USA, for its manufacturing

    Strength of patents Nike Air

    Nike Zoom

    Nike Air Max

    Nike Shox

    Economies of scale

    Application of ITNike relies heavily on IT in order to manage its supplychains

    11

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    12/34

    MarketingNike is a marketing company

    Research & DevelopmentNikes R & D labevaluated as far & away the best in the industry. --Large number of patents testimony to itscommitment to R & D.

    Extensive SCM capabilitieshas attained

    competency in leveraging low cost countries likeChina & Vietnam as its manufacturing hub. Sourcesits products from 900 factories spread across 50

    countries. 12

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    13/34

    Nikes distinctive competency lies in the area ofmarketing, particularity in the area of consumerbrand awareness and brand power.

    While the reasons that Nike is successful inmarketing products are numerous, this keydistinctive competency towers over its competitors.

    As a result, Nikes market share is number-one inthe athletic footwear industry. Catch phrases like,"Just Do It," and symbols like the Nike "Swoosh,"couple with sports icons to serve as instantreminders of the Nike Empire.

    13

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    14/34

    Nike brand is the most valuable among sportsbusinesses

    Of the company's $18.4 billion in revenues in 2009,

    90% was attributable to merchandise emblazonedwith either the Nike or Nike Golf logos.

    Nikes brand value is US$ 18.6 billion in 2012,comprising more than 52% of its enterprise value*

    30thmost powerful brand in the world, and thenumber one in its industry. Its nearest rival Adidas isranked at distant 135, while Reebok is ranked at 408.

    * source: Brandirectory, 2012. 14

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    15/34

    Nikes key resource evaluated on RBV framework

    he test of inimitability

    : Nikes brand value cannot be duplicated or matched

    in the short-term.

    he test of durability: By continually investing significantly in brand building

    exercise, Nike has maintained and increased its brand value. Nike spent morethan US$ 3 billion in 2010 on marketing.

    he test of appropriability: Since a lot of value that Nike creates is owing to its

    brand value, it derives maximum benefit from the value creation process.

    he test of substitutability: Brand as a resource is intangible. The only way itcan be trumped is by creating a stronger rival brand (something that can take

    years to build and leverage) or by diluting Nikes brand value

    he test of competitive superiority: Forbes ranked Nike as the top-most sports

    brand for a number of consecutive years. Its brand value is 10 times that ofReebok and more than 50% greater than that of Adidas. 15

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    16/34

    1. Athletic Footwear

    54 % of total revenue

    Casual Footwear Line

    2. Apparel

    27 % of total revenue

    3. Rest

    Equipment

    Sports related business

    16

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    17/34

    To distribute low-cost, high-quality Japanese

    athletic shoes to American consumers in an attempt

    to break Germanys domination of the domesticindustry

    17

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    18/34

    Quality Products

    Constant Innovation

    Aggressive Marketing

    18

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    19/34

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    20/34

    High-end

    High Income Level between the age of 16-55

    20

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    21/34

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    22/34

    Sports Attitude

    Lifestyle

    Just do it

    You dont win silver,You lose gold

    22

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    23/34

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    24/34

    24

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    25/34

    25

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    26/34

    Departments by both geographic divisions andproduct categories

    Created overlapping management responsibilitiesand a fluid leadership structure

    26

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    27/34

    Sweat Shop debacle, 1990s Diversity and Inclusion

    Cultivate diversity and inclusion to develop world-class, high-performing teams

    Ignite change and inspire critical conversations

    around diversity, inclusion and innovation Create venues and environments for open dialogue,

    diverse opinions and a multitude of perspectives

    27

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    28/34

    28

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    29/34

    THREAT

    OF HOLDUP

    THREAT OFSLACK

    THREAT OFSUBSTITUTIONTHREAT OF

    IMITATION

    ADDED VALUE

    VALUEAPPROPRIATED

    29

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    30/34

    Barriers to Imitation

    Economies of scale

    Shared distribution channels and efficient production reduces costs

    Patents & copyrights

    Nike has around 3775 patents in the sports shoes, apparels and theequipments domaine.g. Nike AIR technology, self lacing shoes, etc.

    Innovation

    Strong emphasis on R&D and product development through newdesigns(more than 300 designs a year)e.g. recycled polyester for jerseys

    Brand reputation and Image

    Celebrity endorsements & sponsorships of sports events 30

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    31/34

    Responses to substitution

    Customization of footwear

    Online customization of footwear

    Aggressive advertising

    Just Do It campaign

    Mergers and Acquisition Umbro, Converse, etc.

    31

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    32/34

    Responses to Holdup Multiple sourcing and Contracting

    Contract suppliers in China, Vietnam, Indonesia and Thailand; Argentina,Brazil, India, and Mexico

    Building relationships with complementors Tie up with Apple for the Nike + iPod sports kit

    Increase Bargaining power

    Just Do It advertising campaign

    Forward Vertical Integration

    Opened Discount stores in rural areas and flagship stores in urban areas

    Building Trust

    Improving working conditions through various programs

    e.g. Joining FLA & GAWC, transparency through publishing monitoring resultson the website 32

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    33/34

    Responses to Slack

    Performance based incentives

    Pay dividends to the shareholders Nike encourages outsiders to become part of

    board, in order to avoid bias connected with

    corporate conformism

    33

  • 8/10/2019 NIKE Strategic Group1

    34/34