NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

18
NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi- Liang Wang

Transcript of NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Page 1: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

NGA Site Response Study

Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang

Page 2: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Project Objectives

• Compare RVT based site response response calculation versus time history approach

• Compare RVT based amp factors (RASCALS) with time history based (SHAKE) amp factors

• Compare amp factor differences between equivalent-linear procedure (RASCALS and SHAKE) and non-linear procedures (D-MOD2 and SUMDES)

Page 3: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Basis of Comparison:• Two shaking levels (Mw 6.5 @ 15 km and Mw 7.5@ 5

km)• Three profile depths (100, 300, and 500 ft)• 30 spectrum compatible ground motions were used for

each shaking level. • Results from one RVT run from RASCALS is

compared with the average of 30 SHAKE run • Non-linear analysis scope reduced to two Mw7.5 time

histories analysis for two depths to demonstrate differences in difference non-linear programs

Page 4: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 7.5, Input M otion R esponse

A verage

Page 5: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0 20 40 60 80Timesecs-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

noitareleccAg

0 10 20 30 40Timesecs-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

noitareleccAg

0 10 20 30 40Timesecs

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

noitareleccAg

Page 6: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0 25 50 75 100 125 150Timesecs-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

noitareleccAg

0 10 20 30 40Timesecs-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

noitareleccAg0 25 50 75 100 125 150

Timesecs-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

noitareleccAg

Page 7: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6.5, Input M otion R esponse A verage

Page 8: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6 .5 , A verage Input M otion R esponse

SH AKE

R ASC AL

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ectr

al P

seud

o-A

cce

lera

tion

(g)

M w 7 .5 , A verage Input M otion R esponse

SH A KE

R A S C A L

Target Spectrum (A&S strike-slip, rock)

Mw=6.5 r=15 kmMw=7.5 r=5 km

Page 9: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Shear Wave Velocity ProfileLa Clenega Site – Simplified CJR Model

0 1000 2000 3000

Vs (ft/sec)

500

400

300

200

100

0D

ept

h (f

t)

Page 10: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1

Sand

Clay

Sand & Clay

Non-Linear Properties

• Based on SHAKE91• Extend to 10% strain• 2 Curves only – simple• Decoupled modulus and damping• Non-linear models should base on matching modulus reduction curves. Damping may be different

Page 11: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.01 0.1 1 10

Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3S

pe

ctra

l Pse

ud

o-A

cce

lera

tion

(g

)

M w 7.5, D eep P rofile - 500 ftSH AKE - G round Surface R esponse

A verage

Deep Profile – 500 ft M7.5 Ground Surface Response

Page 12: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

0.01 0.1 1 10

Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6.5, D eep P rofile - 500 ftSH AKE - G round Surface R esponse

A verage

Deep Profile – 500 ftM6.5 Ground Surface Response

Page 13: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Deep Profile – 500 ftGround Surface Response

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6.5, R= 15 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

Page 14: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Med. Deep Profile – 300 ftGround Surface Response

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6.5 , R =15 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

Page 15: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Shallow Profile – 100 ftGround Surface Response

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 6.5, R= 15 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n (

g)

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKE, m eanRASC ALSH AKE, 84th PercentileSH AKE, 16th Percentile

Page 16: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Deep Profile – 500 ftAverage Spectral Ratio

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 6.5, R= 15 kmSH AKERASC AL

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKERASC AL

Page 17: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Med. Deep Profile – 300 ftAverage Spectral Ratio

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 6.5, R= 15 kmSH AKERASC AL

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKERASC AL

Page 18: NGA Site Response Study Joseph Sun, Tom Shantz, Zhi-Liang Wang.

Shallow Profile – 100 ftAverage Spectral Ratio

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 7.5, R= 5 kmSH AKERASC AL

0.01 0.1 1 10Pe rio d (se c)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Sp

ect

ral P

seu

do

-Acc

ele

ratio

n R

atio

M w 6.5, R= 15 kmSH AKERASC AL