NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

download NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

of 30

Transcript of NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    1/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    NFIU/EFCC

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    2/30

    2

    Defining RiskCompliance risk is a combination of regulatory andreputational risks

    Regulatory riskis the risk that the procedures implemented

    by the entity to ensure compliance to relevant statutory,regulatory and supervisory requirements are not adhered toand/or are inefficient and ineffective

    Reputational riskis the risk that the entity might beexposed to negative publicity due to the contravention of

    applicable statutory, regulatory and supervisoryrequirements and/or providing a service that does notcomply with fit and proper industry standards

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    3/30

    3

    Where Is Our RiskA banks risk profile

    is determined byseveral factors;

    GeographyCustomer baseTransactions

    offeredDo Bank A and Bank

    B have the same riskprofile?

    Bank A: Based inLagos providingprivate banking

    services to toppolitical officials.

    Bank B: Based inGombe offering

    savings accounts tosmall scale tradersand farmers.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    4/30

    4

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)

    Money Laundering

    Risk

    Geographical

    Risk

    Customer

    Risk

    Services

    Risk

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    5/30

    5

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)First step is identifying money laundering risk facing thefirm, taking into account its customers, products andservices, delivery channels and geographical profile andassessing their probability and impact if they occur.

    Banks collect information about customers, then file themaway!! Information should be used to build a profile of the customer

    and assess level of risk. Identify high risk customers at account opening;

    Is the customer in a high risk occupation, does the customer

    operate a high risk business, does the customer require highrisk services.Verify, verify, verify. Customers do lie and you are liable.

    Do you have the correct address, does the account activity fitthe customer.

    Build a base-line. Scrutinize existing accounts to establish

    what is normal especially for high risk activities.Does this customer fit the general pattern for his peers.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    6/30

    6

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)Customer A opens

    and account an sayhe manufacturersindustrial chemicals,a site visitationindicates that hisoperational

    address is in aresidential area. Isthis normal?

    Customer B opens asalary account as acivil servant,however, hefrequently receivesinternational wiretransfers. What do

    you do?

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    7/307

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)Measure levels of risk forcustomers and transactions bydeveloping a set of metrics.

    How many high-risk customersand transactions are normal

    for the institution given thegeographical profile?

    How many customers areconsidered high-risk, normal orlow-risk?

    What type of transactions areconsidered high-risk?

    The risk profile is arrived bytaking these factors intoconsideration.

    Customer A routinely makestransactions just below thereporting threshold.

    Customer Bs accounts has ahigh frequency of deposits by

    different individuals. Signatories on corporate

    account owned by ABC Corp.are changed frequently.

    Customer D makes significantand frequent deposits andwithdrawals into a savingsaccount.

    Are any of these suspiciousacts?

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    8/308

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)Are high risk customers engaging in high risk

    transactions?

    Identifying such correlations is essential toidentifying risk.

    Banks should conduct periodic reviews ofcustomers, transactions and look for

    correlations.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    9/309

    Where Is Our Risk

    (contd.)A bank must monitor its customers activities. Monitoringmust be commensurate with the identified risk.

    Processes must be tailored to specific risks. Applying thesame AML controls to all customers is simply not time or

    cost effective.Do you apply the same CDD procedures to a politicianoperating a private banking account as a petty traderoperating a savings account?

    Staff training to deal with risk should also be tailored.Customer facing staff will need greater training on

    identifying suspicious transactions and behaviour than back-office staff.Banks will need to be proactive in protecting themselves

    from threats. Identifying trends and vulnerabilities will allowthe bank to modify its risk mitigation processes.

    A risk based approach allows the bank to tailor its approach.

    It is not about new tools and processes but about usingexisting tools in the most effective way.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    10/3010

    High Risk Jurisdictions : Geographical

    RiskCustomers or transactions from countries

    that pose a high risk;

    Countries subject to UN sanctionsCountries identified as having high levels of

    corruption or other criminal activity(Transparency International CorruptionPerception Index, Financial Action Task ForceNon-Cooperative Countries and Territories List)

    Countries identified as providing support forterrorist activities.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    11/3011

    High Risk CustomersSome occupations and businesses pose a higher

    level of ML risk;Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

    Cash intensive businesses such as casinos, currencyexchange, money transfer agentsNon-cash intensive businesses that generate substantial

    amounts for certain transactions.Non-governmental and non-profit organisations

    especially in poorly regulated environmentsDealers in high-value items such as estate agents,

    jewellers etcAccounts run or operated by gatekeepers such as

    accountants, lawyers especially where the identity of thebeneficial owner is not properly identified

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    12/3012

    High Risk TransactionsCertain products and services should be

    considered high risk;

    New and innovative services, especially wherethe identity of the owner may not be properlyidentified such as electronic banking products

    International and cross-border banking services

    Private banking servicesProducts and services designed to preserve the

    anonymity of the customer or to avoididentification and detection

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    13/30

    13

    Risk Based Management of ML

    RisksBanks must exercise some degree of judgement

    in determining the level of risk posed bycustomers.Some variables which may determine the

    perceived risk include;Levels of assets; unusually high levels of assets or

    unusually large transactions compared to what isexpected from customers with similar profiles.

    The level of oversight to which the customer is subjected.

    A customer from a jurisdiction with weak AML controls(e.g country on FATF NCCTs list).Public listed companies may pose a lower ML risk.Duration of relationship. Customers with long-standing

    relationships generally pose a lower risk.The use of intermediaries or other structures such as

    shell companies indicate a higher level of risk

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    14/30

    14

    Covering All The Bases: Risk

    MitigationRisk mitigation is about choosing the right

    measure to control risk and applying thesemeasures.

    Involves risk monitoring by putting in placeappropriate systems and keeping up to datewith changes to customer risk profiles.

    Documenting the process and ensuring the

    integrity of the process are essential.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    15/30

    15

    Covering All The Bases: Risk

    Mitigation(contd.)Banks are required to develop and

    implement controls to mitigate the ML riskfrom customers and transactions

    considered to be high risk.The bank should at the minimum consider

    implementing;Increased levels of due diligenceEscalation of approval for the establishment of

    business relationships to managementIncreased monitoring of transactions.Greater frequency of reviews

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    16/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    Although suspicious transaction is subjective,

    a combination of the under listed indicatorswill give us a lead to fish out suspicioustransactions.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    17/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    Large - scale cash transactions

    Rapid off shore transfer of funds immediatelythey are deposited

    Unrealistic business proceeds compared toclients profile

    Unusual funds inflow into customers account

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    18/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    Cross-border travel to undertake simple

    transaction (frequent demand for TCs)Settlement of Bad and Doubtful Debt by third

    parties or without waiver request

    Over/Under Valuation of Insured Assets

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    19/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Unsatisfactory explanation by customer on

    account activitiesRe-activation of dormant account with huge

    amount

    Unusual and complex method of purchasing

    financial instrumentsAtypical account turn over compared to

    clients profile

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    20/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Deposits at various branches the same dayfor no logical reason

    Having Numerous safe deposit Boxes atvarious Banks/Branches

    Questionable rationale of underlying businessrelationships

    Frequent demand for cash exchange of smalldenominations for higher ones

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    21/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    Attempt to avoid disclosing the actual

    sender/beneficiary of fundsAttempts to avoid identifying final

    beneficiaries of accounts (Trust/Nominees)

    Unsatisfactory explanation for business to be

    undertakenComplex and odd settlement for goods and

    services (Payroll etc)

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    22/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Large and/or rapid movement of funds

    Possible client or his associates in relation toprevious crimes

    Atypical or uneconomical fund transfer to orfrom foreign jurisdiction

    Customer having many similar account typewith no justification

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    23/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Last minute alteration on funds movement

    instructionsHuge investments in low profit yielding

    Money Market Instruments (TBs, CPs, etc)

    Discounting of liquid assets at well below

    prevailing market ratesHigh volume of split transaction or frequency

    which is unjustifiable or unrealistic

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    24/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    Taking various Insurance cover for the sameAsset with different Insurance Firms

    Transactions which do not have any economicjustification or lawful objectives

    High credit turn over when the business is notthat lucrative

    When Customer is in the habit of issuing dudcheques

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    25/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Customer is introduced by a sister branch orhead office and customer avoids contact with

    the branchWhere customer engages in business he is

    not registered to undertake

    Frequent transfer of funds to or from border

    towns or branches

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    26/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUSTRANSACTIONS

    Customers source of fund is mainly fromforeign country without justification

    Minors account with high volume oftransaction involving huge sums

    Account operated on credit basis for a very

    long time and having huge credit balance

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    27/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONSAccounts with so many connected and

    remittance accounts without reasonable

    justificationsWhere customer frequently requests for

    extensions and Amendments on EstablishedLetters of credit without reasonable

    justification

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    28/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONSWhere the customer ignores unutilized L.C

    balances

    Presentation of fake documents for Bankfacility

    Where customers identification is discoveredto be fake

    Where customer is acting as an agent andrefuses to disclose the identity of the Principal

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    29/30

    WHAT YOU SHOULD DO IF YOU DECIDE TOCARRY OUT A SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTION.?

    Seek information from the customer as to theorigin and the destination of the funds, the aimof the transaction and the identity of the

    beneficiary.Draw up a written report as quick as possible.

    Ensure that the bank is not exposed to risk, inthe carriage of the transaction.

    Take appropriate action to prevent thelaundering of the proceeds of a crime or anillegal act.

    Send the report timely to the NFIU.

  • 7/28/2019 NFIU Suspicious Transaction Reports

    30/30

    INDICATORS OF SUSPICIOUS

    TRANSACTIONS

    THANK YOU

    NFIU