NFIB USINESS SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC TRENDS2011. 94.1 94.5 91.9 91.2 90.9 90.8. 8. 9.9. OPTIMISM...
Transcript of NFIB USINESS SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMIC TRENDS2011. 94.1 94.5 91.9 91.2 90.9 90.8. 8. 9.9. OPTIMISM...
NFIB SMALL BUSINESS
ECONOMIC TRENDS
NFIB SMALL BUSINESS
ECONOMIC TRENDS
William C. DunkelbergHolly Wade
August 2011
S M A L L B U S I N E S S O P T I M I S M I N D E X C O M P O N E N T S Seasonally Change From Contribution Index Component Adjusted Level Last Month Index ChangePlans to Increase Employment 2% -1 *Plans to Make Capital Outlays 20% -1 *Plans to Increase Inventories -3% 0 *Expect Economy to Improve -15% -4 *Expect Real Sales Higher -2% -2 *Current Inventory 0% 1 * Current Job Openings 12% -3 *Expected Credit Conditions -11% -1 *Now a Good Time to Expand 6% 2 *Earnings Trend -24% 0 * Total Change -8 *
Based on a Survey of Small and Independent Business Owners
Column 1 is the current reading; column 2 is the change from the prior month; column 3 the percent of the total change accounted for by each component; * is under 1 percent and not a meaningful calculation.
The NFIB Research Foundation has collected Small Business Economic Trends Data with Quar-terly surveys since 1973 and monthly surveys since 1986. The sample is drawn from the membership files of the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). Each was mailed a question-naire and one reminder. Subscriptions for twelve monthly SBET issues are $250. Historical and unadjusted data are available, along with a copy of the questionnaire, from the NFIB Research Foundation. You may reproduce Small Business Economic Trends items if you cite the publica-tion name and date and note it is a copyright of the NFIB Research Foundation. © NFIB Research Foundation. ISBS #0940791-24-2. Chief Econo-mist William C. Dunkelberg and Policy Analyst Holly Wade are responsible for the report.
NFIB SMALL BUSINESS
ECONOMIC TRENDS
IN THIS ISSUE
Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Commentary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Optimism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Prices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Employment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Credit Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12Inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14Capital Outlays. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16Most Important Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Survey Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19Economic Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SUMMARYOPTIMISM INDEXThe Index of Small Business Optimism fell 0.9 points in July to 89.9. This was the 5th monthly decline in a row. None of the declines were large but the trend is still going in the wrong direction. At the two year anniversary of the expansion, the Index is only 3.5 points higher than in July 2009 -still firmly rooted in recession territory. Expectations for real sales growth and business conditions were the major contributors to the decline.
LABOR MARKETSLast month, 12 percent (seasonally adjusted) of the owners added jobs, but 14 percent reduced employment, leaving us with a net negative 2 percent of firms adding jobs in July. The remaining 74 percent of owners made no net change in employment, suggesting that firms are holding steady but not planning to grow any time soon. While an improvement from June, job creation still remains solidly negative. Twelve percent (seasonally adjusted) reported unfilled job openings, a disappointing 3 point decline from June. Over the next three months, 10 percent plan to increase employment (down 1 point), and 11 percent plan to reduce their workforce (up 4 points), yielding a seasonally adjusted net 2 percent of owners planning to create new jobs, down 1 point from June. The poor recovery in the jobs numbers is a result of very low housing starts activity and lagging expenditures on ‘services’, both labor intensive industries dominated by small firms. Housing starts show little hope for much job creation in construction in the near future and the most recent reports on consumer spending show continued weakness, with retail sales falling. Without sales, there is little reason to expand. And with Washington politics being as they are, there is plenty of reason to remain uncertain.
CAPITAL SPENDING The frequency of reported capital outlays over the past six point months was unchanged at 50 percent of all firms, an historically weak reading that has persisted for most of the recovery. The percent of owners planning capital outlays in the next 3 to 6 months fell 1 point to 20 percent, a recession level reading that has typified the recovery to date. Six percent characterized the current period as a good time to expand facilities (seasonally adjusted), up 2 points but 2 points lower than January. The netpercent of owners expecting better business conditions in six months was a negative 15 percent, down 4 points, and 25 percentage points lower than January. Twenty-three (23) percent report “poor sales” as their top business problem. Uncertainty is the enemy, and there is plenty of it to convince owners (and consumers) to be cautious (consumer confidence measures weakened in July).
This survey was conducted in July 2011. A sample of 10,799 small-business owners/members was drawn.One thousand nine hundred ten (1,817) usable responses were received – a response rate of 17 percent.
2 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
INVENTORIES AND SALESThe net percent of all owners (seasonally adjusted) reporting higher nominal sales over the past three months lost 1 percentage point, falling to a net negative 8 percent, more firms with sales trending down than up, but still the 3rd best reading in 42 months - a sign of how difficult the recovery has been. The net percent of owners expecting higher real sales fell 2 points to a net negative 2 percent of all owners (seasonally adjusted), 15 points below January’s reading. This is bad news for hiring and inventory investment. A net negative 13 percent of all owners reported growth in inventories (seasonally adjusted), a 1 point improvement from June but double the March reading. Although overall firms are reasonably satisfied with stocks, there are still a large number of firms in “liquidation” mode. For all firms, a net 0 percent (up 1 point) reported stocks too low, a “satisfied” reading based on survey history. Stocks are not excessive, but with rather pessimistic sales expectations, no need to order more.Plans to add to inventories remained unchanged at a net negative 3 percent of all firms (seasonally adjusted), consistent with weak sales expectations and a poor economic outlook.
INFLATIONEighteen (18) percent of the NFIB owners reported raising their average selling prices in the past three months (up 2 points), compared to 24 percent who reported price reductions (down 1 points). Seasonally adjusted, the net percent raising selling prices was 7 percent, down 3 points and half the rate observed in May. The push on prices from Main Street is apparently easing but is still positive. Seasonally adjusted, a net 19 percent plan price hikes, up 4 points. If accomplished, the inflation measures will rise.
PROFITS AND WAGESReports of positive earnings trends were unchanged at a net negative 24 percent of all owners, not a pretty picture, but the best reading in 43 months. Profits are getting some support from rising prices and some improvement in sales trends, but it isn’t much. Six percent reported reduced worker compensation and 16 percent reported gains yielding a seasonally adjusted net 10 percent reporting higher worker compensation, a 2 point gain. A seasonally adjusted 6 percent plan to raise compensation in the coming months, down 1 point from June.
CREDIT MARKETS Four percent reported financing as their #1 business problem, so for the overwhelming majority, “credit supply” is not a problem. Ninety-two (92) percent reported that all their credit needs were met or that they were not interested in borrowing. Eight percent reported that not all of their credit needs were satisfied, and 51 percent said they did not want a loan (13 percent did not answer the question and might be presumed to be uninterested in borrowing as well). Thirty (30) percent of all owners reported borrowing on a regular basis, up 1 point and only 2 points above the record low.
SUMMARY
3 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
COMMENTARYIt is hard to think of anything that happened in July that would make owners more optimistic. The second quarter Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth report was abysmal (1.3%) and Q1 was revised from 1.9% to 0.4%. Indeed, the government reported that the entire recession period was even worse that we thought. The decline in GDP was revised to -5.1%, one full point worse than previously estimated.
Congress did not come up with a budget plan by the time the month ended, and the likes of Paul Krugman (NYT July 30) continued highly partisan assaults on the Republicans. His claim that high tax rates were responsible for the surpluses in the late 1990s is pure political bunk (many Democrats claim this). I thought it was the outrageous levels of capital gains tax revenues from the DotCom bubble and the record employment levels that resulted from the Y2K/Telecom investment boom, along with a Republican controlled Congress that yielded the surpluses. Maybe the Administration can magically concoct another Y2K event in the calendar. Even small business capital spending hit record levels in that investment boom.
Mr. Krugman also blames people who want government spending curtailed for holding us hostage in raising the debt ceiling. More likely the reverse is true, it is those who will not consider curtailing the reach of government that will not agree to a deal. They are holding sensible people hostage to their view of a larger government at the expense of small business owners. There is no limit to the amount of private income Congress will spend on its pet project - mostly designed to keep them in elected office.
The July survey anticipates slow growth for the remainder of the year, high unemployment rates, inflation rates that are too high and little progress on job creation. It seems for all the activity in Washington, D.C…they have done nothing but create a sizeable helping of anxiety, exactly what we don’t need.
4 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
OVERVIEW - SMALL BUSINESS OPTIMISM
70
80
90
100
110
75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11
Inde
x V
alue
(198
6=10
0)
YEAR
OPTIMISM INDEX
Based on Ten Survey Indicators(Seasonally Adjusted 1986=100)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 101.1 101.5 98.0 100.1 98.5 96.7 98.1 95.9 99.4 100.7 99.7 96.5
2007 98.9 98.2 97.3 96.8 97.2 96.0 97.6 96.3 97.3 96.2 94.4 94.6
2008 91.8 92.9 89.6 91.5 89.3 89.2 88.2 91.1 92.9 87.5 87.8 85.2
2009 84.1 82.6 81.0 86.8 88.9 87.8 86.5 88.6 88.8 89.1 88.3 88.0
2010 89.3 88.0 86.8 90.6 92.2 89.0 88.1 88.8 89.0 91.7 93.2 92.6
2011 94.1 94.5 91.9 91.2 90.9 90.8 89.9
OPTIMISM INDEX
Based on Ten Survey Indicators(Seasonally Adjusted 1986=100)
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0
10
20
30
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10Perc
ent "
Goo
d Ti
me
to E
xpan
d"
(th
ick l
ine)
Perc
ent "
Bette
r" M
inus
"Wor
se"
Expe
cted
Gen
eral
Bu
sine
ss C
ondi
tions
(thi
n lin
e)
YEAR
OUTLOOK
Good Time to Expand and Expected General Business ConditionsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
SMALL BUSINESS OUTLOOK
5 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS OUTLOOK (CONTINUED)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 20 20 19 18 18 13 16 13 18 20 17 17
2007 17 18 12 12 12 13 16 12 14 14 13 14
2008 9 8 5 6 4 4 6 6 11 5 7 7
2009 6 3 1 4 5 4 5 5 9 7 8 7
2010 5 4 2 4 5 6 5 4 6 7 9 8
2011 8 7 5 4 5 4 6
OUTLOOK FOR EXPANSION
Percent Next Three Months “Good Time to Expand”(Seasonally Adjusted)
MOST IMPORTANT REASON FOR EXPANSION OUTLOOK
Reason Percent by Expansion OutlookJuly 2011
Reason Good Time Not Good Time Uncertain
Economic Conditions 2 46 14
Sales Prospects 2 4 1
Fin. & Interest Rates 1 1 1
Cost of Expansion 0 3 2
Political Climate 0 11 5
Other/Not Available 1 2 2
OUTLOOK FOR GENERAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS
Net Percent (“Better” Minus “Worse”) Six Months From Now(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 6 3 -5 -3 -10 -8 -6 -8 2 11 11 12
2007 -1 -2 -7 -8 -3 -5 -1 0 2 -2 -10 -4
2008 -22 -9 -23 -12 -12 -19 -17 4 14 -4 -2 -13
2009 -12 -21 -22 2 12 7 -3 10 8 11 3 2
2010 1 -9 -8 0 8 -6 -15 -8 -3 8 16 9
2011 10 9 -5 -8 -5 -11 -15
6 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS EARNINGS
EARNINGS
Actual Last Three MonthsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
ACTUAL EARNINGS CHANGES
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”) Last Three MonthsCompared to Prior Three Months
(Seasonally Adjusted)
MOST IMPORTANT REASON FOR LOWER EARNINGS
Percent ReasonJuly 2011
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
Reason Current Month One Year Ago Two Years Ago
Sales Volume 17 25 33
Increased Costs* 10 10 9
Cut Sell ing Prices 3 3 4
Usual Seasonal Change 3 3 3
Other 5 4 4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 -16 -15 -12 -13 -11 11 -16 -19 -8 -14 -18 -15
2007 -21 -19 -15 -19 -15 -18 -17 -22 -20 -18 -25 -20
2008 -27 -25 -33 -28 -28 -33 -37 -30 -35 -35 -38 -42
2009 -47 -44 -46 -43 -43 -42 -45 -40 -40 -40 -43 -43
2010 -42 -39 -43 -31 -28 -32 -33 -30 -33 -26 -30 -34
2011 -28 -27 -32 -26 -24 -24 -24
* Increased costs include labor, materials, finance, taxes, and regulatory costs.
7 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS SALES
SALES EXPECTATIONS
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”) During Next Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
ACTUAL SALES CHANGES
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”) Last Three MonthsCompared to Prior Three Months
(Seasonally Adjusted)
-40-30-20-10
01020304050
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Expected
Actual
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
SALES
Actual (Prior Three Months) and Expected (Subsequent Three Months)January 1974 to July 2011 (Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 2 6 5 6 11 6 3 2 5 2 0 3
2007 -3 -1 0 4 1 -4 -1 -4 -4 -4 -3 1
2008 -7 -8 -11 -9 -11 -12 -15 -10 -11 -21 -25 -29
2009 -31 -28 -34 -28 -33 -34 -34 -27 -26 -31 -31 -25
2010 -26 -26 -25 -15 -11 -15 -16 -16 -17 -13 -15 -16
2011 -11 -11 -12 -5 -9 -7 -8
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 24 28 12 21 20 13 18 10 17 17 21 18
2007 22 17 14 14 16 11 14 13 14 13 8 6
2008 4 0 -3 -3 -11 -11 -9 -6 -2 -16 -14 -18
2009 -20 -29 -31 -11 -5 -10 -11 -5 -6 -4 -2 -1
2010 3 0 -3 6 5 -5 -4 0 -3 1 6 8
2011 13 14 6 5 3 0 -2
8 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS PRICES
PRICE PLANS
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”) in the Next Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
ACTUAL PRICE CHANGES
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”)Compared to Three Months Ago
(Seasonally Adjusted)
PRICES
Actual Last Three Months and Planned Next Three MonthsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
-30-20-10
010203040506070
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Actual
Planned
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 18 23 17 26 24 23 23 22 20 16 17 8
2007 12 13 15 18 16 19 19 13 9 15 14 16
2008 8 13 18 20 23 29 32 26 20 15 0 -6
2009 -15 -24 -23 -24 -22 -17 -19 -19 -21 -17 -17 -22
2010 -18 -21 -20 -11 -15 -13 -11 -8 -11 -5 -4 -5
2011 -4 5 9 12 15 10 7
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 29 27 26 28 30 29 30 29 22 21 22 26
2007 24 23 22 24 23 21 23 22 21 22 26 26
2008 26 22 29 31 32 36 38 30 24 18 11 3
2009 2 1 0 1 3 5 5 8 6 5 4 3
2010 8 10 9 13 14 11 10 10 7 12 13 15
2011 19 21 24 24 23 15 19
9 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 1 4 -1 -3 -3 -2 2 5 -3 5 0 3
2007 2 4 -6 -5 -2 0 1 4 -1 3 0 2
2008 0 -3 -7 -9 -10 -12 -5 -4 -10 -9 -10 -18
2009 -15 -15 -22 -25 -24 -23 -17 -16 -16 -12 -12 -12
2010 -10 -9 -11 -12 -12 -10 -5 -2 -3 -6 -2 -1
2011 -4 -2 -4 -6 -3 -7 -2
ACTUAL EMPLOYMENT CHANGES
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) in the Last Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 40 40 39 41 46 45 42 46 44 46 44 40
2007 41 41 43 43 42 45 43 44 48 46 40 37
2008 37 36 36 37 33 39 36 35 38 35 31 30
2009 * * 24 24 25 27 26 23 25 25 28 21
2010 24 26 23 26 26 25 28 32 30 28 27 28
2011 28 30 29 32 30 33 31
QUALIFIED APPLICANTS FOR JOB OPENINGS
Percent Few or No Qualified Applicants(Seasonally Adjusted)
-10
0
10
20
30
40
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Planned
Job Openings
YEAR
Perc
ent
EMPLOYMENT
Planned Next Three Months and Current Job OpeningsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
10 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS EMPLOYMENT (CONTINUED)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 26 26 23 31 25 25 24 25 25 27 22 19
2007 26 25 26 26 24 26 23 25 25 22 19 21
2008 24 20 19 21 15 21 17 15 18 14 14 14
2009 11 11 10 9 9 11 9 8 8 8 8 10
2010 10 11 9 11 9 9 10 11 11 10 9 13
2011 13 15 15 14 12 15 12
JOB OPENINGS
Percent With Positions Not Able to Fill Right Now(Seasonally Adjusted)
HIRING PLANS
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) in the Next Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 17 16 9 16 14 9 15 17 17 16 19 10
2007 17 13 12 13 13 12 13 15 14 11 11 11
2008 9 11 3 5 2 5 5 9 7 0 -4 -6
2009 -6 -3 -10 -5 -5 -1 -3 0 -4 -1 -3 -2
2010 -1 -1 -2 -1 1 1 2 1 -3 1 4 6
2011 3 5 2 2 -1 3 2
SMALL BUSINESS COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION
Actual Last Three Months and Planned Next Three MonthsJanuary 1986 to July 2011 (Seasonally Adjusted)
-505
10152025303540
86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 102011
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
Planned Higher
Actual Higher
11 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS COMPENSATION (CONTINUED)
ACTUAL COMPENSATION CHANGES
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) During Last Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 25 24 22 27 24 22 24 25 28 23 25 21
2007 26 30 28 26 29 26 27 24 27 26 21 24
2008 25 23 24 20 15 20 18 18 17 15 13 9
2009 7 1 0 0 0 -2 1 1 3 0 0 3
2010 1 -2 0 3 2 4 3 3 3 4 8 8
2011 10 8 7 9 9 8 10
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 16 20 16 19 15 14 17 16 16 18 20 17
2007 16 19 19 18 16 15 16 14 19 16 15 14
2008 12 12 15 14 8 12 12 11 10 9 10 4
2009 3 3 0 2 1 3 4 3 3 5 1 1
2010 1 6 3 5 4 3 5 6 3 5 5 3
2011 5 7 9 7 7 7 6
COMPENSATION PLANS
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) in the Next Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
PRICES AND LABOR COMPENSATION
Net Percent Price Increase and Net Percent Compensation Increase(Seasonally Adjusted)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-30-20-10
010203040506070
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Pric
es (T
hick
Lin
e)
Labo
r Com
pens
atio
n (T
hin
Line
)
YEAR
12 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT CONDITIONS
CREDIT CONDITIONS
Loan Availability Compared to Three Months Ago*January Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
* For the population borrowing at least once every three months.
-32-28-24-20-16-12-8-404
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
REGULAR BORROWERS
Percent Borrowing at Least Once Every Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 37 38 36 40 38 41 38 46 35 37 38 35
2007 37 39 35 37 38 35 36 35 36 36 32 34
2008 36 34 33 36 35 35 34 34 32 33 31 33
2009 35 36 33 33 34 30 33 32 33 33 33 33
2010 32 34 35 31 32 29 32 31 33 31 28 30
2011 31 31 29 32 29 29 30
AVAILABILITY OF LOANS
Net Percent (“Easier” Minus “Harder”)Compared to Three Months Ago
(Regular Borrowers)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 -5 -5 -6 -4 -5 -5 -6 -8 -3 -6 -6 -6
2007 -5 -5 -7 -5 -6 -5 -5 -7 -9 -6 -7 -7
2008 -7 -5 -7 -9 -8 -7 -9 -10 -11 -9 -11 -12
2009 -13 -13 -12 -14 -16 -14 -15 -14 -14 -14 -15 -15
2010 -14 -12 -15 -14 -13 -13 -13 -12 -14 -11 -11 -12
2011 -10 -11 -8 -9 -10 -9 -10
13 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT CONDITIONS (CONTINUED)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 36/4 37/6 36/6 38/5 38/5 39/5 38/4 44/4 34/4 36/7 34/4 36/5
2007 36/5 40/5 35/5 38/4 39/6 36/4 37/5 35/4 37/5 36/6 32/4 32/7
2008 34/5 35/4 32/6 34/5 34/7 35/5 32/7 35/6 33/6 31/6 31/7 32/6
2009 33/8 32/8 29/10 30/8 28/9 30/10 28/10 30/7 30/10 29/9 29/10 28/8
2010 27/11 29/9 29/11 28/9 28/8 25/10 27/9 27/9 27/9 26/9 25/9 28/9
2011 28/8 29/8 28/7 28/8 28/8 25/9 28/8
BORROWING NEEDS SATISFIED
Percent of All Businesses Last Three Months Satisfied/Percent of All Businesses Last Three Months Not Satisfied
(Borrowers Only)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 -6 -7 -7 -8 -8 -8 -7 -9 -5 -6 -5 -7
2007 -7 -8 -8 -7 -6 -6 -6 -9 -10 -8 -8 -10
2008 -9 -8 -9 -11 -10 -10 -12 -11 -13 -16 -13 -15
2009 -14 -16 -14 -12 -15 -13 -14 -13 -15 -16 -15 -15
2010 -13 -14 -16 -15 -12 -13 -14 -14 -14 -12 -10 -11
2011 -10 -10 -9 -13 -11 -10 -11
EXPECTED CREDIT CONDITIONS
Net Percent (“Easier” Minus “Harder”) During Next Three Months(Regular Borrowers)
5
10
15
20
-40-30-20-10
01020304050
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
YEAR
Rela
tive
(thic
k lin
e)
Act
ual (
thin
line)
INTEREST RATES
Relative Rates and Actual Rates Last Three MonthsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
14 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT CONDITIONS (CONTINUED)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 26 32 29 32 28 30 30 34 22 20 23 16
2007 17 21 19 16 15 12 12 14 15 4 3 1
2008 0 -9 -5 -12 -15 -11 -4 -2 -3 -2 -6 -8
2009 -12 -9 -1 -2 0 0 3 3 5 3 8 3
2010 6 6 9 5 4 0 2 3 1 1 0 1
2011 3 6 5 5 3 0 0
RELATIVE INTEREST RATE PAID BY REGULAR BORROWERS*
Net Percent (“Higher” Minus “Lower”) Compared to Three Months Ago
*Borrowing at Least Once Every Three Months.
ACTUAL INTEREST RATE PAID ON SHORT-TERM LOANS BY BORROWERS
Average Interest Rate Paid
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 8.1 8.3 8.0 8.7 8.1 8.7 9.1 9.0 8.8 8.8 8.3 9.8
2007 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.2 9.5 9.3 9.2 8.7 9.0 9.1 8.5 8.5
2008 8.3 8.1 8.3 7.7 6.9 7.1 7.0 6.9 7.1 6.6 7.0 6.6
2009 6.4 6.2 6.2 6.1 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.9 6.3
2010 6.3 6.0 6.8 6.4 6.5 6.0 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.0 5.7 6.2
2011 6.0 6.0 5.9 6.5 6.0 6.0 5.9
SMALL BUSINESS INVENTORIESINVENTORIES
Actual (Last Three Months) and Planned (Next Three Months)January Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
-30-25-20-15-10-505
1015
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Actual
Planned
Net P
erce
nt
YEAR
15 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS INVENTORIES (CONTINUED)
ACTUAL INVENTORY CHANGES
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) During Last Three Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 3 1 6 0 -2 0 0 3 1 0 0 -3
2007 1 5 2 -2 2 -5 -2 -3 -2 -1 -6 -3
2008 -4 -2 -7 -10 -12 -11 -14 -13 -12 -13 -17 -21
2009 -18 -19 -23 -27 -27 -27 -27 -24 -24 -26 -25 -28
2010 -21 -18 -18 -18 -20 -21 -19 -15 -14 -16 -15 -13
2011 -10 -8 -7 -9 -13 -14 -13
INVENTORY SATISFACTION
Net Percent (“Too Low” Minus “Too Large”) at Present Time(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 -1 -2 0 -1 -1 -1 -2 -6 -6 -3 -6 -7
2007 -2 -2 -5 -3 -6 -7 -2 -2 -3 -7 -3 -3
2008 -4 -4 -1 -1 -3 -1 -4 -3 -1 -4 -4 -7
2009 -6 -5 -4 -5 -2 -5 -4 -4 0 -3 -2 -4
2010 -1 -1 -1 1 0 -1 0 -1 -2 1 -3 -3
2011 0 2 -1 1 -1 -1 0
INVENTORY PLANS
Net Percent (“Increase” Minus “Decrease”) in the Next Three to Six Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 5 7 3 2 3 0 1 -1 -1 4 0 0
2007 2 3 3 3 0 -3 2 -4 0 1 2 -3
2008 -4 -2 -2 -1 -4 -5 -4 -9 -3 -5 -6 -4
2009 -10 -10 -13 -7 -3 -6 -5 -7 -6 -3 -3 -8
2010 -4 -7 -7 -2 2 -3 -4 -7 -3 -4 0 -3
2011 -1 -2 1 -1 -3 -3 -3
16 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS CAPITAL OUTLAYS
0
20
40
60
80
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Perc
ent
YEAR
Actual
Plans
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Actual Last Six Months and Planned Next Three MonthsJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
(Seasonally Adjusted)
ACTUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Percent Making a Capital Expenditure During the Last Six Months
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 62 63 62 62 62 60 61 62 63 62 63 61
2007 62 61 61 60 60 55 58 58 60 61 56 62
2008 58 58 57 56 54 52 52 54 52 54 56 51
2009 51 52 50 46 46 46 46 45 44 45 44 44
2010 47 47 45 46 46 46 45 44 45 47 51 47
2011 51 49 51 50 50 50 50
INVENTORY SATISFACTION AND INVENTORY PLANS
Net Percent (“Too Low” Minus “Too Large”) at Present TimeNet Percent Planning to Add Inventories in the Next Three to Six Months
(Seasonally Adjusted)
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Satisfaction Plans
Perc
ent
YEAR
17 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SMALL BUSINESS CAPITAL OUTLAYS (CONTINUED)
AMOUNT OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES MADE
Percent Distribution of Per Firm ExpendituresDuring the Last Six Months
Amount Current One Year Ago Two Years Ago$1 to $999 4 4 4
$1,000 to $4,999 9 9 8
$5,000 to $9,999 6 5 5
$10,000 to $49,999 15 15 16
$50,000 to $99,999 7 5 6
$100,000 + 8 7 7
No Answer 1 0 0
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLANS
Percent Planning a Capital Expenditure During Next Three to Six Months(Seasonally Adjusted)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 32 35 31 33 28 27 31 28 30 31 31 26
2007 30 30 33 29 29 28 27 27 29 27 27 30
2008 25 26 25 26 25 26 21 23 21 19 21 17
2009 19 18 16 19 20 17 18 16 18 17 16 18
2010 20 20 19 19 20 19 18 16 19 18 20 21
2011 22 22 24 21 20 21 20
TYPE OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES MADE
Percent Purchasing or Leasing During Last Six Months
Type Current One Year Ago Two Years Ago
Vehicles 17 14 15
Equipment 36 30 32
Furniture or Fix tures 10 9 9
Add. Bldgs. or Land 5 3 4
Improved Bldgs. or Land 12 11 12
18 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
July 2011
Problem Current One
Year AgoSurvey
High Survey
Low
Taxes 20 21 32 8
Inflation 9 3 41 0
Poor Sales 23 29 33 2
Fin. & Interest Rates 4 4 37 2
Cost of Labor 4 4 9 2
Govt. Reqs. & Red Tape 16 15 27 4
Comp. From Large Bus. 7 7 14 4
Quality of Labor 5 4 23 3
Cost/Avail. of Insurance 7 8 29 4
Other 5 5 31 2
SELECTED SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
Insurance, Big Business Competition, Inflation, and RegulationJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
0
10
20
30
40
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Big Business Insurance
Inflation Regulation
Perc
ent o
f Firm
s
YEAR
SELECTED SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEM
Sales, Fin. & Interest Rates, Labor Cost, Labor Quality, and TaxesJanuary Quarter 1974 to July Quarter 2011
0
10
20
30
40
74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
Taxes Sales
Interest Rates Labor Quality
Perc
ent o
f Firm
s
YEAR
19 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
SURVEY PROFILE
OWNER/MEMBERS PARTICIPATING IN ECONOMIC SURVEY NFIB
Actual Number of Firms
NFIB OWNER/MEMBERS PARTICIPATING IN ECONOMIC SURVEY
Industry of Small Business
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Perc
ent
0
5
10
15
20
25
Perc
ent
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2006 1274 484 471 1094 440 416 1007 480 380 1075 451 446
2007 1755 750 737 1703 618 589 1613 720 674 1614 719 670
2008 1845 700 735 1768 737 703 1827 812 743 1992 826 805
2009 2013 846 867 1794 814 758 1994 882 827 2059 825 830
2010 2114 799 948 2176 823 804 2029 874 849 1910 807 804
2011 2144 774 811 1985 733 766 1817
NFIB OWNER/MEMBERS PARTICIPATING IN ECONOMIC SURVEY
Number of Full and Part-Time Employees
20 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s Q
uart
erly
Rep
ort
NFIB RESEARCH FOUNDATION SMALLBUSINESS ECONOMIC SURVEY
SMALL BUSINESS SURVEY QUESTIONS PAGE IN REPORT
Do you think the next three months will be a good timefor small business to expand substantially? Why? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
About the economy in general, do you think that six months from now general business conditions will be better than they are now, about the same, or worse? . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Were your net earnings or “income” (after taxes) from yourbusiness during the last calendar quarter higher, lower, or about the same as they were for the quarter before?. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
If higher or lower, what is the most important reason?. . . . . . . . . . . . 6
During the last calendar quarter, was your dollar sales volume higher, lower, or about the same as it was for the quarter before?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Overall, what do you expect to happen to real volume (number of units) of goods and/or services that you will sell during the next three months?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
How are your average selling prices compared to three months ago?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
In the next three months, do you plan to change the average selling prices of your goods and/or services? . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
During the last three months, did the total number of employees in your firm increase, decrease, or stay about the same?. . . . . . . . . . 9
If you have filled or attempted to fill any job openings in the past three months, how many qualified applicants were there for the position(s)?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Do you have any job openings that you are not able to fill right now?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
In the next three months, do you expect to increase or decrease the total number of people working for you? . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Over the past three months, did you change the average employee compensation?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Do you plan to change average employee compensation during the next three months?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
SMALL BUSINESS SURVEY QUESTIONS P AGE IN REPORT
Are…loans easier or harder to get than they werethree months ago? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .12
During the last three months, was your firm able tosatisfy its borrowing needs?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
Do you expect to find it easier or harder to obtain yourrequired financing during the next three months?. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
If you borrow money regularly (at least once every threemonths) as part of your business activity, how does therate of interest payable on your most recent loan comparewith that paid three months ago?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
If you borrowed within the last three months for businesspurposes, and the loan maturity (pay back period) was 1year or less, what interest rate did you pay? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .14
During the last three months, did you increase or decreaseyour inventories?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
At the present time, do you feel your inventories are toolarge, about right, or inadequate?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
Looking ahead to the next three months to six months,do you expect, on balance, to add to your inventories,keep them about the same, or decrease them? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
During the last six months, has your firm made any capitalexpenditures to improve or purchase equipment, buildings,or land? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
If [your firm made any capital expenditures], what wasthe total cost of all these projects? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
Looking ahead to the next three to six months, do youexpect to make any capital expenditures for plantand/or physical equipment? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17
What is the single most important problem facing yourbusiness today? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
Please classify your major business activity, using oneof the categories of example below.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
How many employees do you have full and part-time,including yourself? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19
21 |
NFI
B S
mal
l Bus
ines
s Eco
nom
ic T
rend
s M
onth
ly R
epor
t