NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

16
Federal Aviation Administration NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group June 18, 2009 Köln, Germany

description

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing. International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working Group June 18, 2009 Köln, Germany. Outline. Background Objective NexGen Burner Configuration Results Future Work. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

Page 1: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

Federal AviationAdministrationNexGen Burner for

Seat Cushion Fire Testing

International Aircraft Materials Fire Test Working GroupJune 18, 2009Köln, Germany

Page 2: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany2Federal Aviation

Administration

Outline

• Background• Objective• NexGen Burner Configuration• Results• Future Work

Page 3: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany3Federal Aviation

Administration

Background

• Lack of availability of burners for seat cushion fire testing has resulted in the need for a readily available, equivalent burner

• The NexGen burner has already been found to provide equivalent results to the Park burner for thermal acoustic insulation burnthrough testing

Page 4: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany4Federal Aviation

Administration

Objective

• Configure a NexGen burner to achieve the calibration standards set in chapter 7 of the Aircraft Materials Fire Test Handbook– Fuel flow rate of 2.0 gph ± 0.1 gph– Equivalent to an inlet air flow of 67 ± 4 cfm– 30-second average heat flux of at least 10 BTU/ft2s– Flame temperatures of at least 1800°F on 5 of 7

thermocouples and at least 1750°F on at most 2 thermocouples

– 30-second average of 7 thermocouples at least 1800°F

Page 5: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany5Federal Aviation

Administration

Equivalent Air Flow RateInlet Air Flow:

67 cfm ≈ 1800 fpm in 2.625 in2 air flow meter (HH30)

Exit Air Flow ~ 1600 fpmResulting Sonic Choke Inlet Pressure:47 psig

Note: Exit flow measurements taken with turbulator on

Page 6: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany6Federal Aviation

Administration

Fuel Flow Rate

• Fuel flow rate is dictated by – Specific nozzle used– Inlet fuel pressure– Fuel viscosity

• Several nozzle types were attempted– R: Solid– NS: Hollow– AR: Special Solid– PLP: Semi Solid

www.monarchnozzles.com

Page 7: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany7Federal Aviation

Administration

Average Flame Temperature – 2.25 80° PLP

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360Stator Clocking, Degrees

Ave

rage

Fla

me

Tem

pera

ture

, F

4 1/8" 3 9/16"

4 9/16" 3 1/16"

Nozzle Tip to Stator Face

Page 8: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany8Federal Aviation

Administration

Final NexGen Burner Settings• Fuel Nozzle

– 2.25 gph-rated 80° AR @ 114 psig → 2.04 gph

• Stator Distance– 3 1/16” back from nozzle tip

• Stator Clocking– Approximately 262° from

vertical• Air Flow

– Sonic choke inlet pressure = 47 psig → 1600 fpm exit velocity

Stator Clocking Measurement Example

Page 9: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany9Federal Aviation

Administration

18841874

1900

18711863

1855

1792

1874

1844

1830

1767

1854

1839

1868

1848

1780

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AVGThermocouple

Tem

pera

ture

, F

PARKNEXGEN

Measured Flame Temperatures

Page 10: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany10Federal Aviation

Administration

Measured Heat Flux

11.26 11.28

0

5

10

15

NEXGEN BURNER PARK BURNER

Hea

t Flu

x, B

TU/ft

2 s

Page 11: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany11Federal Aviation

Administration

Seat Testing

• Sample sets were obtained from the conditioning chamber– 3 sets of bottoms and backs for each burner– Cushions had fire blocking layers

Page 12: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany12Federal Aviation

Administration

Seat Cushion Testing – NexGen

14.14

11.11

10

11.75

18.24

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Seat 1 Seat 2 Seat 3 Avg %SD

Perc

ent W

eigh

t Los

s

Page 13: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany13Federal Aviation

Administration

Seat Cushion Testing – Park

8.91 9 8.96

0.71

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Seat 1 Seat 2 Seat 3 Avg %SD

Perc

ent W

eigh

t Los

s

Page 14: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany14Federal Aviation

Administration

Comparison

11.75

18.24

8.96

0.71

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Avg %SD

Perc

ent W

eigh

t Los

s

NexGenPark

Page 15: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany15Federal Aviation

Administration

Summary

• After much trial and error testing, the NexGen burner was able to achieve burner calibration according to the specifications in chapter 7 of the Aircraft Materials Fire Test Handbook

• The NexGen burner results showed inconsistency when compared to the Park

• Despite having a slightly lower flame temperature, the NexGen burner consistenly produced higher % mass loss than the Park

Page 16: NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

NexGen Burner for Seat Cushion Fire Testing

IAMFTWG, Köln, Germany16Federal Aviation

Administration

Future Work

• Laboratory needs some work– Fume hood velocity needs to be adjusted– Scale needs to be properly configured and more

rigidly mounted• More comparative testing

– More testing needs to be done in order to determine burner performance