NEWSLETTER on STI Data and Indicators...4. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016 On 8...
Transcript of NEWSLETTER on STI Data and Indicators...4. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016 On 8...
1
Issue December 2016
DG RTD, A4, Analysis and monitoring of national research policies
NEWSLETTER on STI Data and Indicators
1. Eurostat data on the evolution of employment in the EU
On 13 December 2016 Eurostat published a news release
on the evolution of employment in the EU. Employment
in the EU in the third quarter 2016 increased by 0.2 %
compared to the second quarter and by 1.1% compared
with the same quarter of the previous year. Eurostat
estimates employment in the EU to have reached 232.5
million, not only higher than the pre-crisis level, but the
highest level ever recorded.
Portugal (+1.3%), Spain (+0.8%) and Luxembourg
(+0.7%) showed the highest growth compared to the
second quarter, while the highest decreases of
employment were observed in Latvia (-1.5%), Estonia (-
1.0%) and Bulgaria (-0.8%). Compared to the same
quarter of the previous year Malta (+3.8%) showed the
highest growth in employment, followed by Luxembourg
(+3.0%), Ireland and Spain ( both +2.8%). Employment
decreased in this period in Romania (-1.4%), Estonia (-
1.1%), Latvia (-1.1%) and Bulgaria (-1.0%).
More info: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7771961/2-13122016-AP-EN.pdf/66d95b9e-9ff8-45b3-b1ef-f99f0d6603e7
2. EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 2016
On 1 December 2016 the Commission (JRC) published the 2016 edition of the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. The Scoreboard covers the 2500 companies investing the largest sums in R&D in the
world in the fiscal year 2015/16. The investments of these companies amounted to € 696 billion, an increase of 6.6% over the previous year and representing about 90% of R&D financed by business. The 100 biggest spenders alone account for 53% of the R&D expenditure of the top 2500 companies. Spending growth was driven by companies in the largest
spending sectors (ICT, health, auto), mostly representing high-tech industries. EU companies represent 27% of that spending, US companies 38.6%, Japanese companies 14.4% and Chinese companies 7.2%.
The German car manufacturer Volkswagen, as in the
year before, was the biggest investor worldwide in 2015/16 (€13.6 bn, +6.4%), followed by Samsung (€12.5 bn +8.6%), Intel (€11.1 bn, +21%), Alphabet (Google, € 11.1 bn, +16%) and Microsoft (€ 11.0 bn, +14.1%) Countries with a large number of companies on the list of 2500 top investors include the US (837) Japan
(356), China (327), Taiwan (111), South Korea (75) and Switzerland (58). The EU has 590 companies on the list (i.e. headquarter in an EU Member State), with the largest number in the UK (133), followed, by Germany (132), France (83) and the Netherlands (38).
Many central and eastern European countries, including Poland, Romania and Bulgaria, have no single company on the list. Luxembourg has three times more companies than all central and eastern European EU Member States together. As regards the amounts
invested in R&D, companies from Germany are in the lead in the EU (€ 69.8 bn), followed by companies based in France (€ 28.5 bn) and UK based companies (€ 28.2 bn).
More info: http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard16.html
3. Results of the OECD PISA study
On 6 December 2016 OECD released the results of the
2015 round of the PISA study. PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) is a 3-yearly
assessment of the reading, maths and science skills of 15-year-old pupils. The 2015 study focussed, as 9 years before, on science skills. 540,000 pupils in 72 countries and economies participated in the study. The study shows that only 12 countries/economies improved their performances in
science since 2006. Many Asian countries, economies and regions, such as Japan, Taiwan, Macao, Hong Kong and the Chinese regions that participated (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Guangdong) are among the top performers in science with Singapore (556 score points, OECD average 483) outperforming all other countries. Canada also
performed relatively well.
The top EU (and OECD) performer is Estonia (534 score points), followed by Finland (531), Slovenia (513), the UK (509), Germany (509) and the Netherlands (509). The lowest performers in the EU include Bulgaria (446), Romania (435) and Cyprus (433).
Around 1 in 10 students in OECD countries (but 1 in 4 students in Singapore) performs at the highest level, while more than 1 in five students falls short of baseline science proficiency. Other key findings, as summarized by OECD:
'Gender differences in science tend to be smaller than
in reading and mathematics but, on average, in 33 countries and economies, the share of top performers
in science is larger among boys than among girls. Finland is the only country in which girls are more likely to be top performers than boys. One in four boys and girls reported that they expect to work in a science-related occupation but opt for very
different ones: girls mostly seek positions in the health sector and boys in becoming ICT professionals, scientists or engineers. Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Hong Kong (China) and Macao (China) achieve high levels of performance and equity in education outcomes.
Poorer students are 3 times more likely to be low
performers than wealthier students, and immigrant students are more than twice as likely as non-immigrants to be low achievers. How much time students spend learning and how
science is taught are even more strongly associated with science performance and the expectations of pursuing a science-related career than how well-equipped and staffed the science department is and science teachers’ qualifications.'
More info: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
4
4. OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016
On 8 December 2016 OECD published the 2016 edition of
its two-yearly Science, Technology and Innovation
Outlook. The report highlights that megatrends such as
'ageing societies, climate change, health challenges and
growing digitisation are, among other factors expected to
shape future R&D agendas and the scope and scale of
future innovation demand'. The report expects
'technology to disrupt society with tremendous potential
but uncertain outcomes'.
The STI Outlook 2016 forecasts that public sector science
will continue to play leading roles in developing the new
knowledge and skills needed to nurture these
technological advances and to support their exploitation
in the wider economy.
However, the report shows that expenditures on public
R&D have flattened in the OECD after decades of growth.
Support to public R&D has shifted to universities, which
are at the same time increasingly reliant on private
funding. While less public support has gone to public
R&D, more R&D tax incentives were given to firms.
Overall, direct and indirect support to business R&D has
increased in most OECD countries (see chart below).
More info: http://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-25186167.htm
5
5. WIPO World Intellectural Property Indicators 2016
On 23 November 2016 WIPO published World Intellectual Property Indicators 2016. The report shows that global patent applications rose to 2.9 million in 2015, an increase of 7.8% over 2014. China's patent office received 1.1 million filings, the fastest growth among the top 5 patent offices (+18.7%), and
more than twice the number filed at the USPTO and six times the number filed at the European Patent Office (EPO). Inventors based in China filed over 1 million applications, nearly twice as many as US based inventors (0.53 million). Chinese inventors are relatively home-based with only 4% of their patents filed abroad, while
US based inventors filed more than 40% of their patents abroad. Around 1.24 million patents were granted worldwide in 2015, up 5.2% on 2014. Growth was driven by an increase of grants in China, which issued 359,316
patents in 2015 to overtake the US (298,407) as the largest patent issuing office. About 10.6 million patents were in force in 2015, of which about a quarter in the US
(24.9% of total), 18.3% in Japan and 13.9% in China.
According to WIPO an estimated 6 million trademark applications covering 8.4 million classes were filed globally in 2015, an increase of 15.3% compared to 2014, the highest growth since 2000. Around 78% of global filing activity was accounted for by resident applicants who filed for protection in their own countries.
China saw by far the highest trademark filing activity in 2015 (2.83 million). It was followed by the US (517,297), the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO; 366,383), Japan (345,070) and India (289,843). Among the top 20 offices, Japan (+43%),
Italy (+32.6%), China (+27.4%), India (+21.9%) and South Korea (+13.9%) reported double-digit growth in
2015. Around 4.4 million trademark registrations covering 6.2 million classes were recorded worldwide in 2015. This was a 26.6% increase on 2014 and the fastest growth in over 15 years.
Global industrial design applications filed in 2015 grew by 2.3%, rebounding from a sharp decrease recorded in 2014, when filings declined strongly in China. Designers across the world filed 872,800 applications containing 1.1 million designs. Growth was driven by increases in applications filed in China, the Republic of Korea and the US. China’s office received applications
containing 569,059 designs, accounting for half of the world total. It was followed by the EUIPO (98,162), and the offices of South Korea (72,458), Germany (56,499) and Turkey (45,852). Among them, the Republic of Korea (+5.9%) and China (+0.8%) saw growth, while Germany (-7.5%), Turkey (-6%) and the EUIPO (-0.1%) saw lower filing activity in 2015 than in 2014. The
number of industrial designs registered worldwide increased by 21.3% in 2015, mainly due to strong growth in China.
More info: http://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2016/article_0017.html
6
6. Miscellaneous results from national data sources and studies
a) Germany: Stifterverband data show strong growth in business spending on R&D
On 12 December 2016 Stifterverband released 2015 data
for business R&D spending in Germany, based on the
results of an annual survey. According to these data
business R&D expenditure in Germany amounted to 62.4
billion in 2015, an increase of 9.5% compared to the
year before, when € 57 billion was invested. The new
figures are € 3 bn higher than the provisional data
published by Eurostat in November 2016. The new
results could push EU R&D intensity for 2015 from
2.03%, as currently shown by Eurostat to 2.05%
(Eurostat will update figures in March). Stifterverband
estimates that R&D intensity in Germany in 2015
(broadly) has reached the 2020 target of 3%. The car
industry was the sector that spent most on R&D, € 21.7
bn for research in companies (intramural) plus € 10.2 bn
for research carried out outside the company. The
Stifterverband data also show that research staff
employed by business has increased by 11.9% in
Germany in 2015 to reach 416,000 (in FTE).
More info: https://www.stifterverband.org/pressemitteilungen/2016_12_12_forschung_und_entwicklung
b) USA: California representing 30% of US business expenditure on R&D
Data released by the National Science Foundation on 30
September 2016 show that five US states accounted for
half of US business R&D expenditure in 2013. California
alone had 30% of US business R&D expenditure (77 bn $
out of 265 bn $). California's business R&D expenditure is
higher than that of Germany. Only the US as a whole,
China and Japan spend more than California. Business
R&D intensity in California amounted to 3.5% in 2013.
Other US states with a business R&D intensity of over 3%
include Washington (Microsoft), Michigan (car industry)
and Massachusetts (biotech/pharma). About 40% of US
States have a business R&D intensity of 0.5% or lower.
Data on total R&D intensity by US State are only
available until 2011. These data show that New Mexico,
the location of the Los Alamos National Lab (staff: over
10 000), has the highest R&D intensity of all US states
(7.6% in 2011), followed by Massachusetts (5.6%),
Washington (5.0%) and California (4.8%).
More info: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16317/
7. Quotation check
"The cost of a semiconductor chip fabrication plant doubles every four years" Gordon Moore (*1929)
Intel co-founder Gordon Moore is known for Moore's law. In 1965 he found that the number of components such as transistors on an integrated circuit had doubled in the past every year and speculated that it would still do so in the
coming 10 years. In 1975 he revised that to a doubling every two years. Known today as Moore's law it almost became a self-fulfilling prophesy in the semiconductor industry, with strong impact on technological change, since
computing power increases in line with the number of transistors. The number of transistors on a microprocessor has increased a million-fold since the 1970s, from a few thousand to several billion today. Gordon Moore formulated a second law, stating that the cost of semiconductor chip plants is growing exponentially, doubling every four years. This is also known as Moore's second law or Rock's law (named after venture capitalist Arthur Rock). Driving forces are the need for increasingly sophisticated equipment and specific conditions for clean rooms, as transistors become smaller and wafers, from which chips are cut, are becoming bigger. An exponential growth in the costs of fabrication plants would lead to diminishing returns, slowing down the effect of Moore's first
law. Costs of chip fabrication plants increased from $ 14 million in the 1960s to $ 1.5 billion in 1995, i.e. by a factor of 100. According to the law they should have reached $ 50 billion by 2015. So far the most expensive plant is being built by Samsung in South Korea (opening in 2017) at a cost of 'only' $ 14 bn. Costs are hence still increasing, but more slowly than predicted by Moore's second law/Rock's law.
7
Calendar of data releases and indicator based publications Update of: 20/12/2016 (grey= already published)
2016 Eurostat data updates Commission indicator
based reports
Data and indicator based
reports of other organisations
January Transparency International Corruption Perception Index
Bloomberg Innovation Index
February Tertiary attainment (2015, prov.)
High growth enterprises data (provisional, 2014)
IPR (patent 2013, CTM 2014 and RCD 2014)
Winter forecast (ECFIN)
DESI indicator (CNECT)
OECD R&D expenditure data
Excelacom Internet Minute
March R&D intensity (2014 update)
GBAORD final (2014)
She Figures (online version; RTD)
Science, Research and Innovation performance report (RTD)
European Patent Office , EPO annual results (2015)
Reuters Most Innov. Institutions
OICA world motor vehicle production data
April Education headline indicators (LFS)
May High-tech trade (2015)
Venture capital (2015)
Education enrolment, graduates
Knowledge-int. activities (2015)
Spring Forecast (ECFIN)
Skills forecast (Cedefop)
Invest Europe 2015 European Private Equity Report
Times Higher Ed. Reputations Ranking
IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook
June Education spending
Employment high-tech (2015)
HRST education inflows (2014)
Europe 2020 publication (ESTAT)
July IPR (Patents, 2013), Community Trademarks (2015), RC Designs (2015)
Innovation Union Scoreboard (GROW)
UNESCO UIS STI stats release
August Academic Ranking of World Universities (Shanghai)
WIPO/Cornell/INSEAD Global Innovation Index
September GBAORD (2015 preliminary)
Final high growth ent. data (2014)
Economic data on high-tech (2015)
WEF Global Competitiveness Index
OECD Education at a Glance
October World Bank Doing Business
November R&D intensity (2015 preliminary, 2014 final)
Knowledge-int. activities (2015)
Employment high-tech (2015)
IPR Statistics (CTM 2015 and RCD 2015)
Autumn Forecast (ECFIN)
Education Monitor (EAC)
Annual Growth Survey (ECFIN)
Top500.org: Top 500 Supercomputer list
December ICT household data (2016)
ICT enterprise data (2016)
HRST stocks (2015)
CIS 2014
Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (JRC)
Joint Employment Report (EMPL)
WIPO World Intellectual Property Indicators
OECD STI Outlook (2-yearly)
BDI/Telekom (German) Innovation Indicator
Contact for more information: Richard Deiss (unit A4, Tel 64881), Dermot Lally (55614), Cristina Moise (97934)