New surfactants in wet ball milling and an innovative embedding … · of solids, semi solids and...
Transcript of New surfactants in wet ball milling and an innovative embedding … · of solids, semi solids and...
New surfactants in wet ball milling and an innovative
embedding of Nanocrystals into a granulate matrixby Dr. Matthias Rischer, Director Drug Delivery & Innovation Projects,
Losan Pharma
Introduction of Losan Pharma
➢ Losan Pharma is a pharma-technology company focused on the development
and manufacturing of innovative medicinal products with improved API performance
and/or convenient application.
➢ Based on our specific development know-how and on our platform
technologies we provide solutions to challenging tasks with a view to improved
API stability, superior bioavailability, designed delivery and increased patient
compliance for standard and high-potent APIs.
➢ We are the one-stop-shop for development and commercial manufacturing
services for Europe, the Americas and Asia to support our customers in marketing
value-added products for the benefit of their patients and customers
Losan Pharma Sites
Neuenburg Site
▪ manufacturing and packaging
of solids, semi solids and
liquids
▪ contract development
▪ clinical trial supply
▪ QC and release of FP
▪ storage & stability testing
▪ starting material sampling,
testing and release
Eschbach Site
▪ primary and secondary
packaging
▪ 11 cabinets
▪ stick packs, blisters and
sachets
▪ QC of FP
Frankfurt Site
▪ contract development for
HPAPIs
▪ solid, lipids and
parenteral formulations
▪ quality control testing
APIs up to OEL class 3b (OEB 4) APIs up to OEL class 4 (OEB 5)APIs up to OEL class 3b (OEB 4)
Screening phase – the Losan
approach
Development of a new innovative efficient screening system for early drug development
with a high predictability (Dual Centrifugation; Zentrimix 380R Hettichlab) has
been completed:
Source: Hagedorn et. al. Int. J. Pharm. 530 (2017), 79-88
Screening phase- the
Nanocrystal effect
10 µm 1 µm 100 nm 20 nm >> 1 µm
PARTICLE SIZE
Source: Drug Delivery Strategies for poorly water soluble drugs, Wiley, 2013
10 µm 1 µm 100 nm 20 nm >> 1 µm
Re-crystallisation to large crystals
>> 1 µm
Static initiation of re-crystallisation
thermodynamic solubilitythermodynamic solubility
kinetic solubility
Complete dissolution of
crystals (oversaturation/
molecular solubility)S
OLU
BIL
ITY
Screening – DoE example of
Fenofibrated(90) [nm]
PVP VA 64PVP K25HPMC
DO
SS
SDS
Twee
n 8
0
amount of Copolymer [%]
amo
un
t o
f Su
rfac
tan
t [%
]
The need for new surfactants
There is a need for new stabilising surfactants as one of the golden standards
SDS is not suitable for parenteral applications and can cause side effects in
oral treatments if dosed too high. As a consequence new surfactants have
been developed with improved tox-properties:
N-Decanoyl-amino acids
D.R. Perinelli et. al. Colloids & Surfaces 492 (2016) 38-46
D.R. Perinelli et. al. Eur. J. Ph. & Bioph., 109 (2016) 93-102
Rhamnolipids (glycolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a
mixture of mono and di-rhamnolipids; available by Merck in 90% purity):
CMC (tensiometric)
example of a di-rhamnolipidSource: D.R. Perinelli, E. J. Pharm & Biopharm. 119
(2017) 419-425
The need for new surfactants
The need for new surfactants
Important physicochemical properties and tox profile:
CMC (tensiometric) Hemolytic assay
Source: D.R. Perinelli et. al. Colloids & Surfaces 492 (2016) 38-46
The need for new surfactants
CMC (tensiometric) Hemolytic assay
Source: D.R. Perinelli et. al. Eur. J. Pharm. & Biopharm., 109 (2016) 93-102
Conclusion: similar CMC (chain length difference) and improved hemolytic assay.
C10-ALA, C10-SER and C10-PRO selected (based also on good MTT, LDH and
TEER values, with best profile for C10-SER).
Reference Model Drug
Patel et. al. published a study for Efavirenz (EFV) Nanosuspensions in which
the following parameters have been found to be optimal (Box-Behnken Design;
mean PSD 320 nm; Zetapotential -32.8 mV)
Rabbit study results API concentration 4.0%,
Polymer concentration (PVP K30) 1.0 %,
Surfactant concentration (SDS) 0.5%,
Milling time 22h (beads 0.4 – 0.7 mm)
(Lyophilisation 24h at -70°C)
aqueous solubility of 9.0 µg/mL
BCS class II
Source: Patel et. al. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2014, 80-91
Screening results with new
surfactants
Targets of the study:
➢ Evaluate the stabilization effect of new selected surfactants against SDS for
EFV for PSD
➢ Evaluate the concentration effect of EFV in the nanosuspensions
➢ Evaluate the concentration effect of the new surfactants in relation to the
polymer and API concentration
➢ Evaluate the concentration effect of the new surfactants in relation to the
polymer type and API concentration
➢ Run DoEs if possible
Screening results with new
surfactants
First step:
10% API loading, bead size 0.1 mm, standard milling time (1.5h), standard
polymer matrix
Screening results with new
surfactants
Results for HPC-SL
Screening results with new
surfactants
Results for HPMC
Screening results with new
surfactants
Results for POLOXAMER 188
Screening results with new
surfactants
Second step: 10% (for PVP only)/ 30% API loading, standard bead size
0.3 mm and milling time (1.5 h)
Test
no.
Polymer
type
Polyme
r [%]
Surfactant
type
Surfactan
t
[%]
API conc.
[%]
PSD
(D10)
PSD
(D50)
PSD
(D90)SPAN
E31 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 0.020 0.061 0.195 2.85
E32 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 SER 0.5 30.0 0.020 0.059 0.178 2.70
E33 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 PRO 0.5 30.0 0.020 0.060 0.186 2.77
E34 HPC-SL 3.0Rhamnolipi
d0.5
30.0 0.022 0.075 0.278 3.40
E35 HPC-SL 3.0 SDS 0.5 30.0 0.020 0.058 0.170 2.60
E41 PVP K30 3.0 C10 ALA 0.5 10.0 0.023 0.071 0.225 2.87
E42 PVP K30 3.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 0.021 0.071 0.263 3.41
E43 PVP K30 3.0 C10 SER 0.5 10.0 0.022 0.075 0.280 3.45
E44 PVP K30 3.0 C10 SER 0.5 30.0 4.58 29.6 176 5.79
E45 PVP K30 3.0 C10 PRO 0.5 10.0 0.020 0.061 0.206 3.08
E46 PVP K30 3.0 C10 PRO 0.5 30.0 0.023 0.078 0.281 3.32
E47 PVP K30 3.0Rhamnolipi
d0.5
10.0 0.017 0.044 0.151 3.03
Rhamnolipi 30.0 0.031 0.223 7.14 31
PSD overlay samples E02, E04, E06, E08, E10 (HPC-SL 3.0% / Surfactant 0.5% / API 10%)
PSD overlay samples E31 - E35 (HPC-SL 3.0%, Surfactant 0.5 %, API 30%)
Screening results with new
surfactants
Screening results with new
surfactants
PSD overlay samples E41, E43, E45, E47, E49 ( PVP K 30 3.0%, Surfactant 0.5%, API 10%)
PSD overlay samples E42, E44, E46, E48, E50 (PVP K 30 3.0% / Surfactant 0.5%/ API 30%)
Screening results with new
surfactants
Third step: DoE trial approach with 30% API loading, 2 polymers, 2
surfactants, two concentrations for each, beads 0.3 mm, milling 1.5h
Test
no.
Polymer
typePolymer
Surfactant
type
Surfac-
tantAPI
PSD
(D10)
PSD
(D50)
PSD
(D90)SPAN
Shape of
curveConsistency
[%] [%] [%] [µm] [µm] [µm]
E61 HPC-SL 1.0 C10 ALA 0.1 30.0 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. solid
E62 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 ALA 0.1 30.0 5.00 24.9 109 4.17 multimodal pasty
E63 HPC-SL 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.1 30.0 n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. n.p. solid
E64 HPC-SL 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.1 30.0 0.0328 1.81 38.1 21.0 multimodal viscous
E65 HPC-SL 1.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 2.54 11.1 146 13.0 multimodal viscous
E66 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 0.021 0.065 0.228 3.21 unimodal liquid
E67 HPC-SL 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.3 30.0 2.06 13.9 236 16.8 multimodal pasty
E68 HPC-SL 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.3 30.0 0.026 0.127 4.78 37.4 bimodal liquid
E69 HPC-SL 1.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 0.263 24.7 216 8.75 multimodal pasty
E70 HPC-SL 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.5 30.0 0.025 0.101 2.84 28.0 bimodal liquid
E31 HPC-SL 3.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 0.020 0.061 0.195 2.85 unimodal liquid
E34 HPC-SL 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.5 30.0 0.022 0.075 0.278 3.40 unimodal liquid
E71 HPC-SL 2.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 0.078 8.35 72.9 8.73 multimodal viscous/pasty
E72 HPC-SL 2.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 1.95 19.5 78.2 3.92 multimodal pasty
Screening results with new
surfactants
Test
no.
Polymer
typePolymer
Surfactant
typeSurfactant API
PSD
(D10)
PSD
(D50)
PSD
(D90)SPAN
Shape of
curveConsist.
[%] [%] [%] [µm] [µm] [µm]
E73 HPC-SL 2.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 0.180 10.2 68.6 2.07 multimodal pasty
E76 PVP K30 1.0 C10 ALA 0.1 30.0 4.53 27.0 79.3 2.77 multimodal pasty
E77 PVP K30 3.0 C10 ALA 0.1 30.0 3.52 23.6 96.1 3.92 multimodal pasty
E78 PVP K30 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.1 30.0 2.96 20.8 97.8 4.56 multimodal pasty
E79 PVP K30 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.1 30.0 3.20 26.0 203 7.70 multimodal pasty
E80 PVP K30 1.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 3.86 24.1 206 8.40 multimodal pasty
E81 PVP K30 3.0 C10 ALA 0.3 30.0 4.81 28.6 104 3.48 multimodal pasty
E82 PVP K30 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.3 30.0 0.082 18.3 76.3 4.15 multimodal pasty
E83 PVP K30 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.3 30.0 2.17 8.73 49.3 5.40 multimodal pasty
E84 PVP K30 1.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 3.00 26.1 89.0 3.30 multimodal pasty
E85 PVP K30 1.0 Rhamnolipid 0.5 30.0 0.031 0.254 74.0 291 multimodal pasty
E42 PVP K30 3.0 C10 ALA 0.5 30.0 0.021 0.071 0.263 3.41 unimodal liquid
E48 PVP K30 3.0 Rhamnolipid 0.5 30.0 0.031 0.223 7.14 31.0 bimodal liquid
Screening results with new
surfactants
Forth step: Increase of polymer concentration, comparison to SDS (same
conditions)
➢ Re-analysis of all stable nanosuspensions (1st to 4th step) after several weeks(ambient temperature) have indicated no change in PSD
➢ Zetapotential of stable nanosupensions in the range of -11 to-33 mV
Polymer type Polymer [%] Surfactant type Surfactant
[%]
D10
[µm]
D50
[µm]
D90
[µm]
PVP K 30 4 Rhamnolipid 0.3 0.055 2.95 33.2
PVP K 30 5 Rhamnolipid 0.3 0.033 0.280 18.8
PVP K 30 4 C10 ALA 0.3 0.023 0.081 0.333
PVP K 30 5 C10 ALA 0.3 0.023 0.079 0.296
PVP K 30 4 SDS 0.3 0.023 0.081 0.337
HPC-SL 4 SDS 0.1 0.023 0.086 0.423
HPC-SL 4 C10 ALA 0.1 8.35 42.7 122
HPC-SL 5 C10 ALA 0.1 0.024 0.088 0.443
HPC-SL 4 Rhamnolipid 0.1 0.028 0.203 12.5
HPC-SL 5 Rhamnolipid 0.1 0.024 0.096 1.88
HPC-SL 6 Rhamnolipid 0.1 0.025 0.105 0.540
The importance of milling beads
SiLibeads® ZY-P beads (e.g. 0.1 mm) are well quality-controlled in terms of
surface roughness e.g. by laser microscope
Roughness profile
3D-viewLine
roughnessRa
= 0,008 µm
=0,018 µm
Roughness profile
Downprocessing
▪ The stabilization of nanocrystals is very effective by a fluid bed layering
(FBD) process. Further stabilization by surfactants/polymers is needed
during this step
▪ Loading of up to 50% have been achieved successfully, making doses of
500 mg per unit possible
Embedding of Nanocrystals
Results with a fluid bed coating and compression with Mannitol starter
pellets and 30% Naproxen loading using a 20% stabilized Naproxen
nanosuspension
Embedding of Nanocrystals
Thermo Fisher Pharma 11 System adapted with liquid side feeding and optional vacuum drying
34 hole die plate extrudate strands dry, sieved granules
Embedding of Nanocrystals
Results for extruded granulate
Summary
➢ New tested surfactants resulted in nanocrystal suspensions with unimodal PSDdistributions if sufficient Polymer concentration and the right type of Polymer hasbeen selected
➢ No significant difference between the tested new surfactants have been seen inthe trials
➢ HPC-SL was determined to have the best stabilizing potential
➢ SDS gives lower PSD values compared to the new surfactants if used in the samelow concentration (difference in CMC). Could be compensated by higher polymerconcentrations for new surfactants
➢ DoE trial showed unexpected high variability of PSD data with selected factors (nosurface plots useful)
➢ New surfactants should be further considered for Nanocrystal suspensions and wetball milling and will be subject to an investigation on permeability
➢ New embedding on Nanocrystals by continuous granulation (extruder) gavecomparable results to a Fluid bed drying process and opens new perspectives
Acknowledgments
Nanoteam Losan Pharma
• Dr. Ansgar Bögershausen
• Dr. Martin Hagedorn
• Dominique Di Stefano
• Lena Liebich
• Ampara Spieker
• Doreen Rischkau
• Christine Osterod
Supply of Surfactants & Cooperation
• Diego Romano Perinelli, University of Camerino, Italy
Supply of Zr/Y beads & Cooperation
• Sigmund Lindner, Warmensteinach, Germany