New Investigators: starting up and keeping going
-
Upload
jim-woodgett -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
792 -
download
0
description
Transcript of New Investigators: starting up and keeping going
Start Me Up(a state of mind)
**Motherhood alert: much of what I will say may be
obvious to a mildly alert 10 year old
1. Start-up packages & lab essentials
2. How to support your lab (& yourself)
3. Maximizing opportunities & setting expectations
Why is your Start Up phase important?
h-index over time
After first 5 pubs, trajectory
relatively consistent
The exception
First 5 years of independence often most productive
h-index
h-index
h-index
h-index
h-index
h-index
h-index
h-index
year
year
year
year
year
year
yearyear
Prof. Salaries
• The good news…. “Academics in Canada, where the entry level salaries averaged $5,733, and full professors were paid an average of $9,485, had more cause for celebration than in the United States, where newly hired faculty members averaged $4,950 and full professors $7,358
2
46
8
10
Monthly $1,000s, adjusted
for purchasing
power parity pre-tax
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/02/world/europe/02iht-educlede02.html
0
Public Universities
Twitter Poll on Start Up $
$K
@jwoodgett
Twitter Poll on Start Up $
$
Dry Lab3DSIMWet lab
$ $ $$
$$
$
$
Start Up Packages• Value varies considerably - bigger not necc. better
• Sets expectation on new PI
• If too low, slows success & fosters resentment
• If too high, performance expectation also v. high
• Often small print clauses/clawback
• Little relationship to date/economy
• These are Assist. Profs. Secondary moves usually involve bigger start-ups but also grants often also moved.
Negotiation Tips
• Be reasonable - build a list of equipment and ask what is accessible/can be shared. Understand the environment you are entering, inc. policies
• Be prepared to write grants to support equipment (CFI, etc) - but secure guarantee
• Don’t over engineer what you likely won’t use & remember the small stuff & service contracts
• Lab size & layout - possibilities for expansion?
Split into infrastucture/operating/people Infrastructur
e:
• Depends on type of lab but rules of thumb:
• Wet lab: ~$15K per person/year
• If mouse lab, add $2-3K
• Dry lab: ~$5K per person/year
• Include software seats
Operating
• 3-4 people: e.g. postdoc, technician, student
• Negotiate for 2-3 years but be prepared to cede one to each grant
• Can be in form of student stipends/fellowships
• Technician is critical hire (3 months probation)
• May not be eligible to recruit PhD student initially, dependent on rules of department (may be able to “co-supervise”)
Personnel
• A start up budget is like an ancient grant budget (when salaries, equipment, consumables, were all eligible expenses)
• Consider your start up as grant zero
• Build it by thinking about what you need to do in advance of & to enable your first grant
• You get one shot. It looks bad to go back & ask for changes. Moving money between the elements is OK but ask permission
• A start up budget buys time but it’s value immediately drops (like driving a new car off a lot)
• Clawback (on awarded grant) is OK. It will be remembered & helps next recruit
• Departments want/need you to succeed. Build your budget from bottom up. Don’t start with a target number. You’ll lose credibility without justification/priorities
• Your departmental assessment at ~5 years (often with intermediate checks) depends on many factors but don’t:
• grow too fast OR try to protect start-up for a rainy day
• Share and collaborate within and without dept.
• Be a good citizen (dept duties) but realize these don’t substitute for your scientific productivity.
Supporting Your Lab
• Grants, grants, grants
• These show independence, recognition by peers, competitiveness, etc.
• Very difficult to obtain 2nd grant from agency before renewing first
• Don’t submit prematurely, have your grants read by peers, read your peers grants, get on panels/review other grants
• Plan, plan, plan (deadlines, preliminary data, awareness of opps, etc).
• Look for small, targeted grants as well as the bigger ones (RFPs, etc).
• Encourage your trainees to write for studentships and fellowships.
• Publish…….
• 5 years goes by in an instant
NO SUBSTITUTIONS
• Be aware of pending changes in grant programs
• especially CIHR (Project & Foundation)
• but all grants frequently change their eligibility & requirements (LOI, ROI, etc.)
• Keep CV up to date, build ResearcherID & ORCID files (esp. if have common surname)
Grants
Seed Funding• Most departments/institutes have some discretionary reserves. These can be accessed with good ideas but there are ground-rules:
• Don’t consider this reliable funding. It’s one-off & opportunistic
• It’s also used to bridge grants, deal with unanticipated events
• Best pitches involve careful financial plan, advancing of funds (that have likelihood of repayment) & involve other colleagues. Be visionary but realistic. Share risk (by putting own resources into it)
• Minimally, garner support of your colleagues. Deans, chairs, etc. rely on others for advice. Differentiate seed funds from bridging funds
• Don’t renege on outcomes if wish another kick at the seed can
Summary• Your recruitment is a partly mitigated risk. You are part of the equation. Your success is mutually beneficial to you & your recruiters.
• Mistakes are expensive & wasteful for you, your trainees & funding agencies.
• There is no perfect plan. You were recruited because you exhibit promise & potential. The department is partly on the hook for you to realize that potential but, ultimately, your fate is in your hands.
• Don’t compare yourself to others to set the bar. There are many elements considered & others may have other advantages.
• Build your reputation & your publications. These are your currency.
• Start-up phase thinking should last for your entire scientific career.