New insights into the assembly of massive black holesnatural solution to the last parsec problem...

20
New insights into the assembly of massive black holes Priyamvada Natarajan Yale University Ricarte+; Pacucci+; Cappelluti+; Agarwal+; Haiman+; Tanaka+; Johnson+; Park+; Ricotti+; Khochfar+; Di Matteo+; Yoshida+ Schneider+Dubois+; Bournoud+; Ferrara+; Bromm+; Milosavljevic+; Ricotti+; Norman+; Omukai+; Inayoshi+; Regan+; Sijacki+; Loeb+; Habuzit+; Smith+; Volonteri+; Abel+; Wise+; Latif+; Whalen+; Trakhtenbrot+

Transcript of New insights into the assembly of massive black holesnatural solution to the last parsec problem...

  • New insights into the assembly of massive black holes

    Priyamvada Natarajan

    Yale University

    Ricarte+; Pacucci+; Cappelluti+; Agarwal+; Haiman+; Tanaka+; Johnson+; Park+; Ricotti+; Khochfar+; Di Matteo+; Yoshida+ Schneider+Dubois+; Bournoud+; Ferrara+; Bromm+;

    Milosavljevic+; Ricotti+; Norman+; Omukai+; Inayoshi+; Regan+; Sijacki+; Loeb+; Habuzit+; Smith+; Volonteri+; Abel+; Wise+; Latif+; Whalen+; Trakhtenbrot+

  • Correlations Between MBH-Host Galaxy Properties

    ✦ Galaxy bulge mass [MBH~10-3 Mbulge ] Dressler 89; Magorrian+ 98

    ✦ Galaxy bulge luminosity [MBH-L1.0±0.1 ] Kormendy 93; Kormendy & Richstone 95

    ✦ Stellar velocity dispersion [MBH~σ4 ]Tremaine+ 99; Ferrarese & Merritt 00

    McConnell & Ma+13 van den Bosch et al.+12 Gultekin+ 12

  • Lauer+ 05, 06; Bernardi+ 06; PN & Treister 09; McConnell+ 11,12; PN & Volonteri 13; Marziani & Sulentic 12; Mortlock+ 14; Wu+ 2015; Kulier+15; Thomas+ 16; van den Bosch+ 16; Reines+ 14; McConnell+ 13; Jiang, Greene & Ho 11; Gultekin+09

    Ferrarese+ 2006; Ferrarese & Merritt 2002; Tremaine+ 2002; Kaspi+ 2005Census from SDSS and 2dF Fan+ 2007; Croom+ 2004; Comastri+ 1995; Ueda+ 2003; Treister & Urry 2005; Merloni+ 2004;

    Abundance & LF ofhigh & low z quasars

    XRBz=0

    OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS FOR DEMOGRAPHIC MODELS

  • BHMF FOR BLQSOs FROM SDSS 1 < z < 4.5

    Kelly, Shen+ 10; 11

  • MULTI-WAVELENGTH DATA FOR ACTIVE & QUIESCENT BHs

    MBH ~ 106 -9 Msun

    even 1010 Msun

    z ~ 0 – 7

    z=7 800 Myr after

    the Big Bang

  • Challenges for demographic models at the high mass end

    Missing Broad Line Quasars

    PN & Volonteri +12

  • • Massive initial BH seeds heavier than Pop III remnants at high z (trade-off between obscured growth vs. massive initial seeds)

    • Brief periods of super-Eddington accretion early on

    • Periods of obscured growth during merger triggered phases

    • very inefficient feedback from these BHs otherwise stunts their growth prematurely

    • Long lived steady accretion mode that necessitates natural solution to the last parsec problem (steady trickle through age of universe)

    CONDITIONS NEED TO MATCH THE MASSIVE END OF THE BHMF AT ALL EPOCHS

  • • STOCHASTIC ACCRETION: sampling the Eddington ratio distribution - test is the bright end of the LF (Volonteri’s talk)

    • SHORT-TIMESCALE VARIABILITY: flickering, sub Myr variability - test is the overall shape of the LF (Haiman’s talk)

    • SEEDING PRESCRIPTIONS: light and massive initial BH seeds

    • DISCRIMINATING SEEDING MODELS - testing for predicted populations at high redshift with JWST observations & CXRB-CIRB cross correlations

    New elements to model growth of massive BHs

    INCLUSION OF MORE REALISTIC INPUTS FROM SIMULATIONS

  • PopIIINuclear star cluster Supermassive Star/DCBHs

    Quasi star~101-2 Msun ~103 Msun ~104-6 Msun

    Uncertainity in the masses of the first stars

    A challenge to grow monster BHs seen by t < 2

    Gyrs

    New Planck results push first stars to later even

    ~550 Myrs after the Big Bang

    In protogalaxies: need to avoid fragmentation and star formation, need to centrally concentrate mass

    • Metal-free gas

    • Prevent molecular H-cooling

    MASSIVE SEEDSLIGHT SEEDS

  • Guidance from simulations for modeling variability

    Capelo+ 15

  • Understanding what limits growth rates by accretion

    Growth is faster for larger

    black hole masses

    FEEDBACK LIMITED MODEInefficient growth, outflows,

    ~ 15% of gas accreted LOW MASS SEEDS

    Alexander & PN 14; Park+15; Pacucci+15

    GAS SUPPLY LIMITED MODESuper-Eddington growth, outflows

    unimportant, low radiative efficiency ~ 80% of gas accreted

    MASSIVE SEEDS

  • Time

    Spec

    ific

    Accr

    etio

    n R

    ate Current Models Our implementation

    MAJOR MERGER

    Implementing Stochastic Accretion

    Ricarte & PN 17

  • Random walk through

    this.

    Mergers bump a SMBH here.

    Intrinsic Distribution: Derived from Type II AGN (Jones+ 2016)Elevated Distributions: Derived from broad-line quasars (Kelly & Shen 2013)

    Sampling the Eddington Ratio Distribution

  • Implementing a sub-Myr Flicker + Stochasticity

  • Predicted MF of BHs including these new elements

  • Predicted local M-sigma relation including new elements

  • SCHEMATIC OF HIGH-Z JWST SOURCES

    PN+ 17

    Tim

    e

    Pristine, atomic-cooling

    halo

    Galaxy

    DCBH

    Galaxy

    OBG

    LW Photons

    Galaxy

    OR

    Galaxy with Pop III

    Remnant

  • DISCRIMINATING LIGHT & MASSIVE SEEDS WITH JWST

    LIGHT SEEDS

    MASSIVE SEEDS

    Pacucci+ 15; 16 (GEMS); Agarwal+ 16; PN+ 17

  • CIB-CXB CROSS-CORRELATIONS & LARGE_SCALE CIRB EXCESS

    EARLY MASSIVE BH POPLN

    Yue+ 13

    Cappelluti+13,Helgason+14, Mitchell-Wynne+16 (confirmation), Model from

    Yue+13

  • Bolometric Luminosity Functions with Stochasticity

    Hopkins+ (2007)Our model

    Ricarte & PN 17