New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1...

14
New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1 H.J.Völk 2 , E.G.Berezhko 1 , 1 Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, Yakutsk, Russia 2 Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] The Multi-Messenger Approach to High Energy Gamma-ray Sources, Barcelona, July 4-7, 2006
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    224
  • download

    0

Transcript of New evidence for strong nonthermal effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant Leonid Ksenofontov 1...

New evidence for strong nonthermal

effects in Tycho’s supernova remnant

Leonid Ksenofontov1

H.J.Völk2, E.G.Berezhko1,

1Yu.G.Shafer Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Aeronomy, Yakutsk, Russia2Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany

[email protected]

The Multi-Messenger Approach to High Energy Gamma-ray Sources, Barcelona, July 4-7, 2006

The model: supernova explosion

Vp

Vs

shock wave

ejecta (piston)

supernova

CRs

ISM: nH (~1 – 100 cm-3)

T (~104 – 106 K)

B0 (~1 – 100 μG)

SN: ESN (~1051 erg)

Mej (~1 Msun)

Vp0 (~105 km/s)

diffusive shock acceleration

3

f f

f f p Qt p

ww

c g

gg g g a g a c

0,

,

1 ,

t

P Pt

PP P c P

t

w

ww w

w w

3e e

e e e21

1

3

f f pf f p f

t p p p

ww

The model: basic equations

4

2 2 20

4

3

c

c p fP dp

p m c

Hydrodynamicequations

CR transport equationsfor protons and electrons

CR pressure 1 12

( ) ( )4

inj sinj

uQ p p r R

mpInjection term

ρ(r, t) – gas density

w(r, t) – gas velocity

Pg(r, t) – gas pressure

f(p, r, t) – CR distribution function

( ) ( )3

B

pcp p

eBCR diffusion coefficient

2 2

1 2 20

9

4 em c

r B pSynchrotron loss time

Völk et al. 2002, 2005About 10% of the explosion energy has been transferred into CR energy up to now, which means that the CR energy content is Ec = 0.1 Esn.

Distance determinations to Tycho’s supernova:

From the optical measurements d = 2.3 ± 0.8 kpc (Smith et al. 1991)

It is hard to escape from the uncertain range 2 – 4 kpc with the analyses done so far (Ruiz-Lapuente 2004)

What’s new:

From the Chandra measurements Warren et al. (2005) estimate a mean ratio of contact discontinuity (ejecta) radius to blast wave radius as 0.93

Badenes et al. (2005) found that the properties of the X-ray emission are well reproduced by a 1D delayed detonation model with a kinetic energy of ~ 1.2 × 1051 erg.

Qualitative estimate of gamma-ray flux

In the Sedov phase

- constant

3D Simulations by Blondin & Ellison (2001)

Correction factor 1.05

The ratio of the radii of the contact discontinuity and the forward shock

Spectral energy distribution of the gamma-rays

Conclusions:

HEGRA Upper Limit is consistent with the distance 3.3 − 4 kpc The expected π0-decay γ-ray energy flux is (2 − 5)×10−13 erg/(cm2s)

The new Northern hemisphere IACT such as MAGIC, VERITAS will be able to detect Tycho’s SNR

TeV gamma-rays predominantly have hadronic origin

Detection of a TeV signal is also important for the correct determination of key Supernova parameters

Kepler’s SNR

Total (π0-decay + IC) integral γ-ray energy fluxes as a function of γ-ray energy for the same four cases as in Fig.1. For comparison, the respective sensitivities for a 5σ detection in one year with GLAST (Weekes 2003, Proc. 28th ICRC, 8, 3), and in 50 hours at 20º zenith angle for a photon index 2.6 (as for the Crab Nebula) with H.E.S.S. (Funk 2005, in PhD thesis), are shown.