New Approaches to Insomnia and Depression€¦ · Astellas, Abbott, Neosync, Brainsway, Janssen,...
Transcript of New Approaches to Insomnia and Depression€¦ · Astellas, Abbott, Neosync, Brainsway, Janssen,...
1
New Approaches to Insomnia
and Depression
Andrew Krystal, MD, MSDirector, Sleep Research Laboratory and Insomnia Program
Director of Neurosciences Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute
Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina
2
Disclosures
• My content will include reference to commercial
products; however, generic and alternative
products will be discussed whenever possible.
• Consulting: Abbott, AstraZeneca, Attentiv, Teva,
Eisai,, Jazz, Janssen, Merck, Neurocrine,
Novartis, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Roche, Somnus,
Sunovion, Somaxon, Transcept, Vantia
• Grants/research support: NIH, Teva, Sunovion,
Astellas, Abbott, Neosync, Brainsway, Janssen,
ANS St. Jude, Novartis.
3
Overview
• The relationship of insomnia and
depression
• General treatment strategy
• Available data on the treatment of
insomnia in patients with insomnia and
depression
• Trying to make sense of the findings
• Conclusions
4
90% with MDD Have Sleep Problem:
DSM-IV Major Depression
• 2-week period of depressed mood or loss of interest
• Clinically significant distress or impairment of functioning
• Symptoms not due to substance abuse or medical condition
• 4 or more of the following symptoms:
– Insomnia/hypersomnia
– Weight loss/decreased appetite
– Psychomotor agitation/retardation
– Fatigue/loss of energy
– Worthlessness and guilt
– Diminished concentration/indecisiveness
– Thoughts of death and suicide
Armitage R, et al. Depress Anxiety. 1997;5:97-102; Reynolds CF III, Kupfer DJ. Sleep.
1987;10:199-215; APA, 2001.
5
Major Depressive Disorder
• Sleep alterations reported include:– Difficulty falling and staying asleep
– Increased light, stage 1 sleep
– Decreased SWS
– Decreased (<65 min) REM latency
– Prolonged first REM sleep
– Increased total REM sleep
• REM and SWS changes not currently believed relevant to insomnia diagnosis or outcome
Gillin et al., Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979; Kupfer et al., Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; Walter et al., . Biol Psychiatry 1989;
Berger et al., Biol Psychiatry 1982; Tsuno et al., J Clin Psych. 2005
6
Changes in Sleep in MDD
• Decreased amount of sleep– Prolonged sleep latency
– Increased wake time in middle of night
– Early morning awakenings with inability to return to sleep
– Reduced sleep efficiency
– Decreased total sleep time
• Alterations in sleep stages –implications?
– Decreased slow-wave sleep (stages 3 and 4)
– Shortened REM latency (<65 minutes)
– Increased total amount of REM and REM%
Armitage R. Can J Psychiatry. 2000;45:803-809; Kupfer, et al. 1995; Benca, et al. 1992.
7
Normal
MDD
Sleep in MDD
Stg 4
Stg 3
Stg 2
Stg 1
REM
Waking
87654321
Time (Hours)
Time (Hours)
87654321
Stg 4
Stg 3
Stg 2
Stg 1
REM
Waking
8
Insomnia in MDD: Symptom or
Co-Morbid Conditions?• Are sleep problems best thought of as
symptoms or conditions that are co-morbid
with psychiatric disorders?
• Long considered symptoms: 1983 NIH
Consensus Conference:• Chronic insomnia is caused by medical and
psychiatric disorders
• Insomnia-specific treatment is not needed
• Treating the “underlying disorder” should address the
insomnia
9
Evidence for Bidirectionality, Insomnia
Independence - Insomnia:• Increases the risk of future depression
• Decreases antidepressant response
• Is independent risk factor for suicidality, attempts
and completed suicide in MDD pts
• Insomnia is a stronger predictor of near-lethal suicide
attempts than a specific suicide plan
• Relative risk of suicide death in studies up to 2.4
• Is the most frequent residual symptom in
antidepressant responders
• Residual insomnia increases relapse riskFawcett J. J Clin Psychiatry.1988;49;Suppl 7-8; Fawcett J, et al. Am J Psychiatry.1990;147(9):1189-1194; Reynolds CF, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:958-962; Breslau N, et al. Biol Psychiatry.1996;39:411-418; Ford DE, Kamerow DB. JAMA.1989;262(11):1479-1484; Adam K, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 1986;20(4):301-306; Vgontzas AN, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.2001;86(8):3787-3794; Ford DE, Cooper-Patrick L. Depress Anxiety.2001;14(1):3-6; Roberts RE, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(1):81-88; Fava GA, et al. J Affect Disord. 1990;19:149-152; Nierenberg AA, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:221-225; Weissman, et al. Gen Hosp Psych. 1997. Hall et al., Psychosomatics. 1999; McCall et al., Sleep Medicine 2010
10
Sleep Disturbance Major Depression
Bidirectional Effects
11
Strategies for Treatment of
Insomnia in Depressed Patients • Monotherapy with sedating antidepressant
– Mirtazapine: 15–45 mg qhs; tricyclic antidepressant• Advantages: Single medication — good compliance?
• Disadvantages: Limited antidepressant options; risks residual daytime sedation, weight gain, etc.
• Nonsedating antidepressant plus:
– Sedating antidepressant: trazodone: 50–200 mg qhs; mirtazapine 15–30 mg qhs; low-dose tricyclic antidepressant
– Hypnotic agent• Advantages: greater flexibility in antidepressant selection; More predictable rapid sleep
improvement; can d/c sedating agent and continue antidepressant
• Disadvantages: Compliance? Cost
– Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI)
Nowell PD, Buysse DJ. Depress Anxiety. 2001;14:7-18; Nierenberg AA, et al. Am J Psychiatry.
1994;15:1069-1072; Dording CM, Mischoulon D, Petersen TJ, et al. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2002;14:143-147;
Saletu-Zyhlarz GM, Abu-Bakr MH, Anderer P, et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry.
2002;26:249-260.
12
Cognitive Behavioral Insomnia
Therapy
• Multiple components frequently
administered in combination
– Sleep Hygiene
– Stimulus Control
– Sleep Restriction
– Cognitive Therapy
– Relaxation Techniques
13
Sleep Hygiene Education
• Caffeine - sources & effects
• Nicotine
• Role of exercise
• Light bedtime snack (milk, peanut butter)
• Alcohol, tobacco & other substances
• Environment: light, noise, temperature
17
CBTI+Antidepressant Meds in
MDD• MDD patients receiving CBTI along with
escitalopram had a greater depression
remission rate than those administered a
control behavioral intervention along with
escitalopram (62% vs 33%)
• Two trials recently completed of anti-
depressant meds plus CBTI
– Improvement in insomnia mediates MDD
improvement; Detailed results pending
Manber et al., Sleep. 2008
18
Available Data on Insomnia
Pharmacotherapy• Studies of sedating antidepressants don’t
specifically assess sleep effects
– Don’t indicate utility of treating sleep
• No studies of Sedating antidepressant +
Non-sedating antidepressant
• Studies of treatment of residual insomnia
with drug for sleep + antidepressant
– Zolpidem, Trazodone
• “Hypnotic” + Non-sedating antidepressant
– clonazepam, eszopiclone, zolpidem CR
19
Improvement in Residual Insomnia
in SSRI-Treated Patients with MDD
Greater improvement in sleep compared
with placebo found with adjunctive:
• Trazodone
• Zolpidem
– Improved reported function and QOL
Asnis GM, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:668-676.
Nierenberg AA, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1069-1072.
20
Trials of Antidepressant/Sleep
Agent Co-Therapy
• Clonazepam
• Eszopiclone
• Zolpidem CR
2121
Screening
21
Trial design:
Clonazepam in patients with insomnia and MDD
Open-label fluoxetine 20 mg/d
Double-blind treatment(21 days)
Week 0 6 8
Clonazepam 0.5–10 mg/d (n=40)
Placebo (n=40)
3
20–40 mg/d
Taper(12 days)
Smith WT, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:1339-45
2222
22
Clonazepam:
Depression outcomes in patients with insomnia and MDD
FLU (20–40 mg/d) + PBO (n=40)
FLU (20–40 mg/d) + CLO 0.5–1.0 mg (n=40)
Smith WT, et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:1339-1345
HAM-D17 Total Score
Week 1 Week 3 Week 40
5
10
15
20All patients received fluoxetine
Improvement18
14 13.5
11.5
15
11
**
***
Mean
HA
M-D
17 t
ota
l sco
re
**p<0.01, ***p<0.001 vs fluoxetine + placebo
23
Screening
Trial design:
Eszopiclone in patients with insomnia and MDD
Open-label fluoxetine 20–40 mg/d
Eszopiclone 3 mg/d (n=269)
Placebo (n=274)
Single-blind
placebo
Double-blind treatment Run-out
Week –2 0 4 8 10
Fava M, et al. Biol Psychiatry. 2006; Krystal et al., J Clin Sleep Med. 2007
24
****
*
*
0
30
60
90
120
150
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Placebo+Fluoxetine
Eszopiclone+Fluoxetine
Min
ute
s (
media
n)
Week of Study
*p<0.0002 vs placebo
p values reflect results from change from baseline analyses using ANCOVA.
Sleep Latency (LOCF)
25
WASO (LOCF)
*
**
†
* *-15
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Placebo+Fluoxetine
Eszopiclone+Fluoxetine
Min
ute
s (
media
n)
Week of Study
*p<0.007 vs placebo
†p<0.05 vs placebo
p values reflect results from change from baseline analyses using ANCOVA.
26
Total Sleep Time (LOCF)
*****
*
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Placebo+Fluoxetine
Eszopiclone+Fluoxetine
Min
ute
s (
media
n)
Week of Study
p values reflect results from change from baseline analyses using ANCOVA.
*P<0.0001 vs placebo
27
Change from Baseline in HAM-D17
-10.9
-12.2-12.9
-14.8
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Week 8 Week 10
-9.2 -9.5-10.4
-11.1
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Week 8 Week 10
Placebo+Fluoxetine
Eszopiclone+Fluoxetine
All Items Excluding Insomnia Items
LS
Mean C
hange
p values reflect results from change from baseline analyses using ANCOVA
p=0.002
p<0.0001
p=0.001p=0.01
28
Antidepressant Response and Remission
(LOCF)
48
59
30
36
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Week 4 Week 8
19
33
22
42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Week 4 Week 8
Placebo+Fluoxetine
Eszopiclone+Fluoxetine
Response
(50% HAM-D17 decrease)Remission
(HAM-D177)
Perc
ent
of P
atients
p=0.14
p=0.03
p=0.29
p=0.009
29
Improvement in MDD Not Seen
with Zolpidem CR• Identical study carried out with zolpidem
CR and sleep was improved but no
improvement in depression vs placebo
Sheehan et al., 2009
3030
30
Study design:
Zolpidem CR in patients with insomnia and MDD
Double-blind treatment Run-out
Zolpidem controlled-release 12.5 mg/d (n=190)
Placebo (n=190)
Open-label escitalopram 10 mg/d
Week –1 0 4 8 10
Screening
12 16 20 2624
Responder-randomized treatment
Responders ≥50%
improvement in HAM-D17
Fava M, et al. Poster presented at APA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC; 2008
3131
Sleep Latency
0 2 4 6 8-150
-100
-50
0
All patients received escitalopram
Improvement
**** ** **
Number of weeks of treatment
Mean
ch
an
ge f
rom
baseli
ne
in
sle
ep
late
ncy (
min
ute
s)
Wake After Sleep Onset
0 2 4 6 8-80
-60
-40
-20
0
All patients received escitalopram
Improvement
*** ****** ***
Number of weeks of treatment
Mean
ch
an
ge f
rom
baseli
ne
in
WA
SO
(m
inu
tes)
Total Sleep Time
0 2 4 6 80
50
100
150
All patients received escitalopram
Improvement
*** ****** ***
Number of weeks of treatment
Mean
ch
an
ge f
rom
baseli
ne
in
TS
T (
min
ute
s)
31
Zolpidem CR:
Sleep outcomes in patients with insomnia and MDD
**p<0.001, ***p<0.0001vs escitalopram + placebo
ESC 10 mg/d + PBO (n=190)
ESC 10 mg/d + ZOL CR 12.5 mg (n=190)
Fava M, et al. Poster presented at APA Annual Meeting, Washington, DC; 2008
3232
32
Zolpidem CR:
Depression outcomes in patients with insomnia and MDD
ESC 10 mg/d + PBO (n=190)
ESC 10 mg/d + ZOL CR 12.5 mg (n=190)
Fava M, et al. Poster presented at the 22nd Annual APSS Meeting (SLEEP); June 2008
Week 4 Week 8
-15
-10
-5
0
All patients received escitalopram
Improvement
-8.1-9.1
-10.9
-11.3
Me
an
ch
an
ge
fro
m b
ase
line
HA
M-D
17
to
tal sco
re
33
How Do We Explain Eszopiclone
vs Zolpidem CR Difference?
• Sleep effect sizes are comparable but
significant difference in associated effect
on depression.
• Improvement in depression may not be
mediated by improvement in sleep; and
Either:
– Eszopiclone is an antidepressant and
Zolpidem CR is not
– Zolpidem CR is an anti-antidepressant and
Eszopiclone is not
34
BENEFIT SUSTAINED FOR AT LEAST 2 WEEKS POST
DISCONTINUATION OF INSOMNIA THERAPY
35
Discontinuation Effects
WASO
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
FLX + PBO FLX + ESZ
Days after eszopiclone discontinuation
Min
ute
s (
media
n)
Week 8 = last week of DB treatment
BSL Wk 8
36
Discontinuation Effects
TST
200
250
300
350
400
450
-2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
FLX + PBO FLX + ESZ
Days after eszopiclone discontinuation
Min
ute
s (
media
n)
Week 8 = last week of DB treatment
BSL Wk 8
37
Mechanism of ESZ vs Zolpidem
Difference?• Benzodiazepines Temazepam, Flurazepam, Triazolam etc.
– A group of compounds with related chemical structure
– Mechanism of action:• GABA receptor comprised of 5 peptides that form channel
which controls the flow of chloride ions in and out of the neuron.
• Generally, Cl concentration greater outside than inside the neuron. GABA binding opens the channel and resulting inward flux of CL hyperpolarizes neuronal membrane causing inhibition
• Benzodiazepines bind to a binding site on α subunit of GABA receptor complex and enhance this GABA-mediated inhibition
• “Non-Benzodiazepines” Zolpidem, Zaleplon, Eszopiclone, Indiplon
– A group of compounds unrelated to selves or benzos
– Mechanism of action:• Same as benzos, relatively greater α subunit binding specificity
38
The GABA Receptor Complex
39
GABA-A Subunit-Specific Effects
• The effects of binding to α subunits differ
because of location of GABA receptors
containing them– Greater binding to α subunits of GABA receptors in
the cerebellum will result in greater effect on balance.
– Greater binding to α subunits of GABA receptors in
the amygdala will result in greater effect on anxiety.
– Evidence of differential binding in animals
• Limited human data on differential α subunit binding
40
GABA Alpha Subunit Subtypes
41
Alpha
subunit
Agents with
Significant
Effects
Possible
Adjunctive
Therapeutic
Effects
Potential
Adverse Effects
a1
Triazolam, Temazepam,
Flurazepam, Estazolam,
Quazepam, Zaleplon,
Zolpidem, Zolpidem CR,
Eszopiclone
Anti-ConvulsantCognitive Impariment,
Ataxia
a2
Triazolam, Temazepam,
Flurazepam, Estazolam,
Quazepam, Eszopiclone
Anxiolytic,
Myorelaxant,
Antidepressant?
a3
Triazolam, Temazepam,
Flurazepam, Estazolam,
Quazepam, Eszopiclone
Anxiolytic,
Myorelaxant,
Antidepressant?
a4Analgesia Ataxia, Amnesia
a5
Triazolam, Temazepam,
Flurazepam, Estazolam,
QuazepamMyorelaxation
Cognitive Impairment
Tolerance
Animal Data on Effects of GABA Alpha Subunit Binding
Mohler et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2002; Kopp et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004; Van Rijnsgever et al., J
Neurosci. 2004; Chandra et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006; Crestani et al., Neuropharmacology, 2002;
Griebel et al., J Psychopharmacol. 1998
42
Conclusions
• Targeting pharmacologic treatment
specifically to insomnia can significantly
improve sleep and reported daytime
function and QOL
– Further studies needed to determine
• Optimal duration of treatment
• If treating insomnia decreases relapse rate
43
Conclusions
• Effects of treating insomnia on
antidepressant response are variable
– Esz but not Zolp appears to augment
antidepressant effect; Clonazepam?
• Further studies needed:
– To confirm antidepressant effect of ESZ and mechanism
(a2, a3 ?)
» To determine if antidepressant benefit is sustained and if there is
decreased risk of relapse
» To determine if ESZ alone is antidepressant
» With other (a2, a3 ?) agents
– Relationship between antidepressant and sleep effects
» Do drugs with sleep benefit and antidepressant
effects have greater augmentation effect?